DOCSLIB.ORG

County of Frontenac Communal Servicing Study, 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
County of Frontenac Communal Servicing Study, 2019 COUNTY OF FRONTENAC JUNE 2019 COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY 2611 QUEENSVIEW DRIVE SUITE 300 OTTAWA, ON K2B 8K2 T: 613.829.2800 COUNTY OF FRONTENAC JUNE 2019 COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY PREPARED FOR: COUNTY OF FRONTENAC JOE GALLIVAN PREPARED BY: DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ECONOMIC WSP DEVELOPMENT 2611 Queensview Drive, Suite 300 2069 Battersea Road Ottawa, ON K2B 8K2 Glenburnie, ON K0H 1S0 T: 613.690.1114 T: 613.548.9400 x350 E: [email protected] ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The County of Frontenac extends their appreciation to the members of the Technical Advisory Committee listed below for their support, time, and expertise in the preparation of this Study. Their passion and stewardship of the Study will be instrumental in driving change, while building great communities in the County and in the Townships. Members of the Technical Advisory Committee: Susan Brant, County of Frontenac Claire Dodds, Township of South Frontenac Mike Elms, Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing Katrina Furlanetto, Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority Joe Gallivan, County of Frontenac Jim McIntosh, Planning Advisory Committee Member, County of Frontenac Gord Mitchell, Kingston, Frontenac and Lennox & Addington Health Unit Trish Johnson, Environmental Consultant Jon Orpana, Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks Kelly Pender, County of Frontenac Megan Rueckwald, County of Frontenac Mark Segsworth, Township of South Frontenac COUNTY OF FRONTENAC WSP COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY June 2019 TABLE OF EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................... IV CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................. 1 1.1 The Servicing Problem ................................................ 3 1.2 What are Communal Services? ................................... 4 1.3 Why are Communal Services the Right Fit for the County of Frontenac? .................................................. 6 1.4 Study Purpose ........................................................... 12 2 COMMUNITY OVERVIEW ................................. 12 2.1 Demographic Trends ................................................. 12 2.2 Land Use ................................................................... 14 2.3 Historic Villages and Mainstreets ............................... 17 2.4 Housing ..................................................................... 18 2.5 Environment and Natural Heritage ............................. 19 2.6 Climate Change and Risk .......................................... 20 3 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ......................... 21 3.1 Legislative and Regulatory Implications for Communal Servicing ................................................................... 24 4 EXISTING LOCAL PLANNING CONTEXT ....... 25 4.1 The Role of Conservation Authorities ........................ 25 4.2 Official Plan Review ................................................... 26 4.3 Summary ................................................................... 31 COUNTY OF FRONTENAC WSP COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY June 2019 Page i 5 COMMUNAL SERVICES BEST PRACTICES ... 32 6 ENGINEERING BEST PRACTICES .................. 35 7 FINANCIAL MODEL AND RISK MITIGATION .. 35 7.1 Assumptions .............................................................. 36 7.2 Methodology .............................................................. 37 8 CONCLUSION ................................................... 43 TABLES Table 7-1: Financial Model User Inputs Required ................. 38 Table 7-2: Example Communal System Catastrophic Failure Likelihood and Risk Tolerance ............................................. 40 FIGURES Figure 1-1: County of Frontenac Key Map .............................. 2 Figure 1-2: Different types of servicing systems ..................... 5 Figure 1-3: Subdivision Development Potential on Individual Servicing .................................................................... 10 Figure 1-4: Subdivision Development Potential on Communal Servicing .................................................................... 11 Figure 2-1: Allocation of Permanent Population Growth in the County of Frontenac by Municipality, 2011-2036 .................. 13 Figure 2-2: Settlement Areas in the County of Frontenac ..... 15 Figure 2-3: Approximate boundaries for Snow Road Station Settlement Area in North Frontenac (left) and Sydenham Settlement Area in South Frontenac (right) .......................... 16 Figure 2-4: Verona Mainstreet, circa 1930 (Jeff Green, Frontenac News, 2015) ........................................................ 17 Figure 2-5: County of Frontenac Crown Land, Figure #2 Crown Land, County of Frontenac Official Plan, 2016 .......... 19 Figure 2-6: Big Salmon Lake in Frontenac Provincial Park (CC 2.0 Ted Goldring, 2006) ....................................................... 20 Figure 3-1: Regulatory approvals process for a hypothetical communal wastewater system ............................................. 23 WSP COUNTY OF FRONTENAC June 2019 COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY Page ii Figure 4-1: Key Map of Conservation Authorities within County of Frontenac............................................................. 25 Figure 5-1: Example of emerging wastewater treatment technologies, PhytoLinksTM Modular Floating Treatment Wetland System for stormwater and wastewater applications (TerrapinWater) .................................................................... 34 Figure 7-1: Logarithmic vs. Linear Scale .............................. 39 APPENDICES A Federal and Provincial Regulatory Framework B County and Townships Planning Context C Draft Official Plan Policies D Engineering Best Practices E Engineering Best Practices - Attachments F Financial Model Sample Outputs COUNTY OF FRONTENAC WSP COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY June 2019 Page iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The County of Frontenac’s permanent and seasonal populations are projected to grow over the next 20 years. With population growth comes development pressures and the need to consider where and how development can be accommodated and serviced, while maintaining and enhancing the vitality and livability of the County’s villages and hamlets as rural community hubs with a distinct sense of place. Existing approaches to water and wastewater servicing constrain the County’s potential for growth. The cost of providing or expanding municipal water and wastewater services to all rural areas is not a fiscal reality for most municipalities. Development on private individual on-site services inherently results in lower forms of density, due to the spatial requirements associated with well and septic treatment systems, and associated separation distances. Continued development in the County on private services has the potential to result in inefficient use of land, and threaten the long-term viability of the County’s villages and hamlets, especially their mainstreets. Without innovative approaches to servicing, the County and developers are limited in their ability to respond to community needs in the provision of diverse housing types along the housing spectrum to enable residents to age in place. Development on smaller lot sizes could assist in addressing increasing concerns related to rural housing affordability and accessibility. Private servicing also limits the revitalization of village and hamlet mainstreets and commercial cores to be vibrant, walkable, and compact, and able to accommodate new commercial and mixed-use development. Communal services are systems that provide water and wastewater treatment to clusters of residences or businesses. They can be a less expensive alternative to centralized municipal services and a more environmentally-friendly alternative to private on-site services. However, perceived obstacles have slowed the implementation of communal services in many jurisdictions. A key benefit of communal services is that they represent alternative water and wastewater servicing approaches that can provide the County and Townships with the innovative technology and flexibility to accommodate growth and achieve planning, environmental, and economic development objectives. The fundamental purpose of this Communal Servicing Study (“the Study”) is to demonstrate that the perceived obstacles are just that, and to equip the County of Frontenac with the planning, engineering, and economic development tools necessary to enable redevelopment and new development on the basis of communal services. Communal water and wastewater servicing offers the potential to enable new development and infill across the County, including on village and hamlet mainstreets, addressing some of the challenges associated with centralized municipal services and with private on-site services. Most importantly, communal servicing has the potential to support more compact, land-efficient development than is possible with private WSP COUNTY OF FRONTENAC June 2019 COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY Page iv servicing, at a lower cost than is possible with centralized municipal services, and enable revitalization of the County’s communities. The type of communal services treatment and disposal system that is chosen to service a development depends on many factors, including site soil characteristics, the presence of surface water features close to the site, design sewage flows, raw sewage strength, and effluent requirements. This Study includes Engineering Best Practices that provide a guideline for the planning, selection, and design of a communal on-site sewage treatment and disposal system, as well as best practices for installation, operation,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rank of Pops
    Table 1.3 Basic Pop Trends County by County Census 2001 - place names pop_1996 pop_2001 % diff rank order absolute 1996-01 Sorted by absolute pop growth on growth pop growth - Canada 28,846,761 30,007,094 1,160,333 4.0 - Ontario 10,753,573 11,410,046 656,473 6.1 - York Regional Municipality 1 592,445 729,254 136,809 23.1 - Peel Regional Municipality 2 852,526 988,948 136,422 16.0 - Toronto Division 3 2,385,421 2,481,494 96,073 4.0 - Ottawa Division 4 721,136 774,072 52,936 7.3 - Durham Regional Municipality 5 458,616 506,901 48,285 10.5 - Simcoe County 6 329,865 377,050 47,185 14.3 - Halton Regional Municipality 7 339,875 375,229 35,354 10.4 - Waterloo Regional Municipality 8 405,435 438,515 33,080 8.2 - Essex County 9 350,329 374,975 24,646 7.0 - Hamilton Division 10 467,799 490,268 22,469 4.8 - Wellington County 11 171,406 187,313 15,907 9.3 - Middlesex County 12 389,616 403,185 13,569 3.5 - Niagara Regional Municipality 13 403,504 410,574 7,070 1.8 - Dufferin County 14 45,657 51,013 5,356 11.7 - Brant County 15 114,564 118,485 3,921 3.4 - Northumberland County 16 74,437 77,497 3,060 4.1 - Lanark County 17 59,845 62,495 2,650 4.4 - Muskoka District Municipality 18 50,463 53,106 2,643 5.2 - Prescott and Russell United Counties 19 74,013 76,446 2,433 3.3 - Peterborough County 20 123,448 125,856 2,408 2.0 - Elgin County 21 79,159 81,553 2,394 3.0 - Frontenac County 22 136,365 138,606 2,241 1.6 - Oxford County 23 97,142 99,270 2,128 2.2 - Haldimand-Norfolk Regional Municipality 24 102,575 104,670 2,095 2.0 - Perth County 25 72,106 73,675
    [Show full text]
  • Community Safety & Well-Being Plan
    June 2021 Community Safety & Well -Being Plan United Counties of Leeds and Grenville and the Town of Prescott Jane Torrance Stephanie Gray Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 1. Introduction to Community Safety and Well-being 6 1.1 Background 6 1.2 Environmental Scan 7 1.3 Objectives 9 1.4 Approach and Methodology 10 2. Risks to Community Safety and Well-Being 12 2.1 Community Development 12 Poverty (Basic Needs and Food Security, Income, Unemployment) 13 Income 15 Unemployment 18 Strategies to Mitigate the Risk 19 Transportation 20 Strategies to Mitigate the Risk 21 Housing and Homelessness 22 Strategies to Mitigate the Risks 26 Rural Inclusion 27 Strategies to Mitigate the Risk 28 Priority Populations 29 Early Years 29 Strategies to Mitigate the Risk 31 Youth 31 Strategies to Mitigate the Risk 32 Seniors 33 Strategies to Mitigate the Risk 34 First Nations Indigenous Culture 35 Strategies to Mitigate the Risk 37 2.2 Population Health: Physical Health, Mental Health, Substance Use 38 Physical Health 40 Substance Use and Mental Health 41 Substance Use 43 Strategies to Mitigate the Risk: 46 CSWB – Leeds Grenville and Town of Prescott 1 Mental Health 47 Strategies to Mitigate the Risk 49 2.3 Safety: Domestic Violence, Sexual Assault, Human Trafficking 52 Strategies to Mitigate the Risk 57 3. Outcomes and Actions and Implementation 60 References 64 CSWB – Leeds Grenville and Town of Prescott 2 Executive Summary The United Counties of Leeds and Grenville and the Town of Prescott have been working with their community partners to develop a Community Safety and Well-being Plan, as mandated by legislation under the Police Services Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Looking for a Boiler Supply & Servicing Company with The
    Service Area Volume 49 • June 2017 South West tel: 519 884 0600 505 Dotzert Court, fax: 519 884 0213 Unit 1 toll free: 1 800 265 8809 Waterloo, ON N2L 6A7 www.waterloomanufacturing.ca East tel: 613 228 3597 19 Grenfell Crescent, Bay 1 fax: 613 225 0116 Ottawa (Nepean) ON toll free: 1 800 265 8809 K2G 0G3 www.waterloomanufacturing.ca Looking For A Boiler Supply & Servicing Company With The Knowledge & Experience To Get It Right? We are that company and we want to help you optimize your boiler room. Established in 1850, Waterloo Manufacturing Ltd. has a long history of growth and evolution that continues to this day. In our early days we began as a manufacturer of farm machinery equipment, steam engines, pulp and paper rolls, and in 1947, became an authorized Cleaver Brooks Representative for South West Ontario. In 1984, we streamlined the company to further focus on solely providing boiler room equipment solutions in South West Ontario. In 2015, a unique opportunity arose to expand our company to include the Eastern Ontario region formerly covered by John M. Schermerhorn Ltd. In 2017, a further opportunity arose to expand our company to include the territory formerly represented by Johnson Paterson, Inc. to be the sole representative for Cleaver Brooks in the province of Ontario. *Refer to Map on Page 4. Ontario West Central Ontario Ontario East • Brant County • Algoma District • Carleton County • Bruce County • Cochrane District • Dundas County • Dufferin County • Durham County • Frontenac County • Elgin County • Haliburton County • Glengarry
    [Show full text]
  • Land Ambulance Service Delivery Options
    TO: Chair and Members Corporate and Emergency Services Committee FROM: Terri Burton Director, Emergency Services DATE: February 18, 2015 SUBJECT: Land Ambulance Service Delivery Options REPORT NO: CES-4-2015-5 RECOMMENDATION None. For information only. ORIGIN The Province of Ontario, Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, transferred responsibility for land ambulance delivery to upper-tier municipalities (UTMs) (and service boards where no upper-tier exists), effective January 1, 2001. The District of Muskoka (District) contracted the delivery of ambulance services through a Request for Proposal process in 1999 and again in 2008. The District’s current contract with Medavie EMS Ontario is scheduled to expire December 31, 2015. BACKGROUND The Emergency Health Services Branch (EHSB) of the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care oversees air and land ambulance services in Ontario, as well as, ambulance communication centres that are responsible for dispatching those services. EHSB manages and regulates land ambulance services provided by upper-tier municipalities and District Social Services Administration Boards by establishing standards for the management, operation and use of ambulance services and ensuring compliance to those standards. The Ambulance Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. A.19, as amended by the Services Improvement Act, 1997, sets out the legislative framework for the funding and delivery of land ambulance services under Municipal jurisdiction. The District provides 24 hours per day, 7 days per week land ambulance service delivery throughout Muskoka and neighbouring communities when requested. The District and its contractor are collectively responsible for: Administration and records management; Page 1 Recruitment, hiring, training and review of staff performance; Scheduling work rosters; Productivity and quality regulations assurance; Liaison with related agencies and levels of government; Fleet and facilities maintenance; Budget preparation; and Policy and procedure development and implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • Sources for Birth, Marriage and Death
    Archives of Ontario Research Guide 204 Sources for Births, Marriages and Deaths Last Updated: August 2020 Family group posing in front of house C 130-5-0-0-105 Marsden Kempt fonds 1 In this guide ................................................................................................................... 3 Where do I find these records? .................................................................................... 3 Where do I find church records? ................................................................................. 3 What do I need to get started? ..................................................................................... 4 The Records .................................................................................................................. 4 1. Church records ................................................................................................... 4 1.1. Church records collection (F 978) ................................................................ 4 1.2. Marriage records collection (F 982) ............................................................. 5 1.3. Society of Friends (Quakers) records (F 997) .............................................. 5 1.4. Muliticultural History Society of Ontario records (F 1405) ............................ 5 2. Ontario Genealogical Society’s cemetery recordings collection (F 977) ............ 6 3. Municipal records ............................................................................................... 6 4. Records in local collections
    [Show full text]
  • Lanark & Renfrew Agri Economic Impact
    The Economic Impacts of Agriculture on the Economy of Lanark and Renfrew Counties FINAL REPORT Supported by: Human Resources Development Canada Lanark County Federation of Agriculture Renfrew County Federation of Agriculture Arnprior Area Federation of Agriculture The County of Lanark The County of Renfrew The Lanark, Renfrew & Algonquin Training Board Ottawa Valley Association for Agricultural Self Reliance The City of Pembroke The Town of Smiths Falls Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Prepared by: Harry Cummings & Associates Inc. 96 Kathleen St. Guelph Ontario, N1H 4Y3 Phone (519) 823-1647 Fax (519) 821-0202 http://www.web.ca/~hca [email protected] Copies of the full report are available from: Graham Lightfoot Federation of Agriculture Field Representative 66 Pembroke St. West, Cobden, ON. K0J 1K0 Executive Summary Rural Ontario has experienced enormous change in the last fifty years. While the rural population has become predominantly non-farm based, the structure of the rural economy has experienced a major transformation with service sector jobs now exceeding the number of jobs in agriculture. Other indicators such as declining farm numbers and farm jobs seems to confirm the view held by some that agriculture is a fading industry. However, a closer look at the Agriculture sector shows that it remains an important engine of economic growth in Ontario. Between 1985 and 1995, farm gate sales in Ontario experienced an average annual increase of 3.5%, rising from $5,511 million to $7,778 million. Projected farm gate sales of $8,840 million for 1999 suggest that agriculture is continuing on its course of growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Invading Species Awareness Program for Ontario 2009
    2009/10 Invading Species Awareness Program for Ontario Annual Report for 2009/10 INVADING SPECIES AWARENESS PROGRAM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Invading Species Awareness Program The Invading Species Awareness Program (ISAP) has been a joint partnership initiative of the O.F.A.H. and the MNR since 1992; focusing on preventing invasive species introductions to Ontario’s forests and waters. In 2009, in collaboration with hundreds of community groups, nongovernment organizations and all levels of government, the ISAP reached hundreds of thousands of Ontarians engaging their participation in prevention. Hundreds of citizen scientists and professional field staff from numerous agencies participated in our monitoring and reporting programs. The ISAP made valuable contributions to early detection and rapid response initiatives for invasive species threatening Ontario’s biodiversity such as Asian carp, kudzu, European water chestnut, and water soldier. 2009 marked the successful completion of a multi‐year provincial effort to train the bait industry to implement aquatic invasive species prevention plans throughout their industry. The ISAP made significant contributions to provincial, national and international initiatives including the Ontario Invasive Plant Council, the U.S. Great Lakes Panel on Aquatic Nuisance Species and the Canadian Aquatic Invasive Species Network, and the development of the bi‐national Lake Superior Aquatic Invasive Species Prevention Plan. Partnerships In 2009, the O.F.A.H. and the MNR continued the successful joint delivery of the ISAP, with O.F.A.H. staff working collaboratively with staff from MNR’s Biodiversity Section, as well as numerous district offices around the province. Federally, funding contributions were made from Environment Canada’s Invasive Alien Species Partnership Program, and the Lake Simcoe Clean Up Fund, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, and Human Resources Development Canada’s Canada Summer Jobs Program and Eco‐Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Annual Report, Gull Lake Waste Disposal Site (Closed)
    2019 Annual Report, Gull Lake Waste Disposal Site (Closed) Environmental Compliance Approval No. A380204 March 20, 2020 Prepared for: The Corporation of the Township of North Frontenac © Cambium 2019 Reference No.: 8560-009 CAMBIUM INC. 866.217.7900 cambium-inc.com Peterborough |Barrie | Oshawa | Kingston 2019 Annual Report, Gull Lake Waste Disposal Site (Closed) The Corporation of the Township of North Frontenac Cambium Ref. No.: 8560-009 March 20, 2020 Executive Summary The Gull Lake Waste Disposal Site operates under the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks Environmental Compliance Approval No. A380204. The site is on part of Lot 13, Concession 1, geographic Barrie Township, Township of North Frontenac, County of Frontenac. The site is accessed at 1651 Gull Lake Road and is 3.0 km east of the village of Harlowe and 300 m south east of Big Gull Lake. The site is closed and contains approximately 3,400 m³ of waste. The waste footprint covers approximately 0.25 ha within a 4.96 ha property. Impacted groundwater is interpreted to percolate through the waste, contact the competent bedrock, and migrate westerly, discharging into the low-lying wetland area surrounding the waste mound. The results of the groundwater and surface water sampling programs indicated the presence of landfill impacts adjacent the toe of the waste mound. Regardless of minor impacts observed, most parameter concentrations met the compliance criteria indicating adverse impacts were not occurring to the surface water receptor immediately adjacent the waste mound. Further, due to the geographic separation of where leachate is discharged to surface at the site and Big Gull Lake, observed impacts will be attenuated before the surface water enters Big Gull Lake.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Notes from Northern Frontenac County by Ross D
    72 Historical Notes from Northern Frontenac County by Ross D. James In the autumn of 1993, I received from townships (Kennebec, Olden, Oso) and Denise Wilkins, Park Naturalist at Bon most of his observations were from Echo Provincial Park, a package these counties, although he made visits containing field notes on 8 x 5 inch to otherareasfarther north. Theoriginal cards from northern Frontenac County. notes from which the following were Thesenotes werecompiled by R. (Bob) taken have been deposited in the v. Lindsay, who lived at Arden Archives oftheRoyal OntarioMuseum. (44°43'N, 76°56'W) in Frontenac County. Most notes were of his own BrownPelican, Pelecanus occidentalis: observations, buthealso was in contact On 26 September 1933, he reports with numerous local residents or watching onefor several minutes flying cottagers who contributed additional about Big Clear Lake (44°43'N, information. 76°55'W) beside Arden, apparently He had consulted the diaries of looking for food. There seems a Edwin Beaupre who lived at Sharbot reasonable probability that the identity Lake just after the tum of this century. of the bird was correct as he notes the From this source, observations by wide expanse of the wings, the neck Beaupreand C.J. Young, someofwhich drawn back, legs not trailing, and the were included in Macoun and Macoun enormous beak. among other things. (1909), were noted on these cards, The main concern would be the origin mainly_from 1902 and 1903. Lindsay's ofthe bird. Might there have been birds own observations began as early as in flying condition in a zoo at that time? 1922, although there are very few notes Lindsay reports sending a number of recorded until 1931.
    [Show full text]
  • Population, Housing and Employment Projections Study County of Frontenac ______
    Population, Housing and Employment Projections Study County of Frontenac ________________________ Final Report Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. 905-272-3600 January 20, 2020 [email protected] Table of Contents Page Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... i 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Terms of Reference ................................................................................ 1-1 2. Approach .......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 What Drives Population Growth .............................................................. 2-1 2.2 Long-term Permanent Population and Housing Forecast Approach ....... 2-5 3. Overview of Macro-Economic Employment and Demographic Trends ...... 3-1 3.1 Ontario Economic Outlook within the Canadian Context ........................ 3-1 3.1.1 Outlook for Ontario’s Manufacturing Sector ............................... 3-2 3.2 Regional Economic Trends ..................................................................... 3-3 3.2.1 Regional Labour Force Trends, Kingston C.M.A., 2001 to 2016 ........................................................................................... 3-3 3.2.2 Frontenac County Economic Trends .......................................... 3-5 3.3 Observations ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Environmental History of the Ontario Cheese Industry
    AN ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY OF THE ONTARIO CHEESE INDUSTRY BUILDING ‘A NATURAL INDUSTRY OF THIS COUNTRY’: AN ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY OF THE ONTARIO CHEESE INDUSTRY FROM THE 1860S TO THE 1930S By HAYLEY GOODCHILD, B.A. (HONS), M.A. A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy McMaster University Copyright by Hayley Goodchild, 2017 McMaster University DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (2017) Hamilton, Ontario (History) TITLE: Building ‘a natural industry of this country’: an environmental history of the Ontario cheese industry from the 1860s to the 1930s AUTHOR: Hayley Goodchild, B.A. HONS (Trent University), M.A. (McMaster University) SUPERVISOR: Associate Professor Michael Egan NUMBER OF PAGES: xi, 351 ii Lay Abstract This dissertation examines the origins and development of the factory cheese industry in rural Ontario between the 1860s and 1930s. I challenge the belief that cheese manufacturing was a “natural industry of this country” whose development was cooperative and inevitable. Instead I argue that the industry was a deliberate project of rural reform encouraged by elite ‘dairy reformers’ who believed cheese factories could sustain the social, economic, and environmental progress of rural society indefinitely. The industry failed to deliver all the reformers promised, even though it became one of the province’s most significant export-oriented industries by the early-twentieth century and transformed the environment and rural society in the process. Rural people and the environment behaved in more complicated ways than reformers anticipated, and the changing capitalist economy made the industry’s long-term success untenable. This study also contextualizes the twenty-first century resurgence of craft production in Ontario.
    [Show full text]
  • Township of Central Frontenac Regular Council
    Central Frontenac Regular Council January 26, 2021 – 4:00 PM held virtually via Zoom AGENDA Page 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of Agenda a) Approval of Agenda THAT the agenda for the regular Council meeting or January 26, 2021 be approved as presented [amended] 3. Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof 4. Approval of Minutes 8 - 16 a) Regular Council Meeting January 12, 2021 THAT the minutes of the regular council meeting held January 12, 2021 be approved as presented [amended]. 5. Mayor's Remarks 6. Deferred Items 7. Staff Reports/Departmental Updates 17 - 24 a) Fire and Emergency Services 8-2021 CFFR Activity Report THAT Council receive for information the CFFR Activity Report. 25 - 45 b) Finance/Treasury 9-2021Accounts Payable Report THAT Council approve the Cheque Distribution reports totalling $2,010,403.90 as prepared by the Treasurer. 46 - 50 c) Finance/Treasury 10-2021 Apportionment Report THAT Council approve the following apportionments of assessment as recommended by MPAC for 2020 & 2021 as applicable for the following Page 1 of 179 Page roll numbers: 10-39-070-010-28609-0000, 10-39-070-010-28603-0000, 10-39-070- 010-28800-0000, 10-39-070-020-20435-0000, & 10-39-070-010-20437- 0000. 51 - 53 d) Administration/Development Services 11-2021 Naming of Private Lane THAT Council receive the report entitled “Naming of Private Lane: Richard Brannigan Trail” AND FURTHER that the bylaw be passed later in the meeting to amend By-law No. 2002-125 to add “Richard Brannigan Trail” to the schedule to said bylaw.
    [Show full text]