Effects of Political Violence on Incumbent Political Parties Reşat Bayer, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey, +90-212-3381551,
[email protected] Özge Kemahlıoğlu, Sabanci University, Istanbul, Turkey,+90-216-4839268
[email protected] Zübeyde Ece Kural, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden,
[email protected] Abstract While the large-N literature has paid some attention to the relationship between electoral politics and terrorism with a focus on whether terrorism affects left-wing or right-wing parties, we argue, that the role of incumbency is overlooked. We maintain that through local state resources and party machinery the national incumbent party is able to overcome criticisms that breaches to security happened on its watch. We conduct separate analyses on the 1993 and 1997 general elections from Chile and five general elections between 1995 and 2011 in Turkey. These two countries are not only historically among the most terror-affected countries of the world and have a checkered history with democracy (Weinberg 2013) but they also enable us to compare the effects of urban ideological terrorism in the case of Chile with that from Turkey which includes rural guerrilla warfare and has an ethnic dimension, and also affected civilians as well as non- civilians. We combine data from the Global Terrorism Database with electoral politics data. Our choice of countries enables us to examine left-wing incumbents, right-wing incumbents, single party and coalition incumbent governments. Unlike much of the relevant literature, our statistical analysis is conducted at the municipal level, where we argue that the effects of terrorism are most likely to be felt given the proximity to the attack.