DOCSLIB.ORG

Mary Kelly Her Burial and Resurrection

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

November 2020 No. 168 HER BURIAL AND MARY KELLY RESURRECTION LINDSAY SIVITER JONATHAN MENGES UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER DORSET STREET REVISITED BRUCE COLLIE NINA AND HOWARD BROWN VICTORIAN FICTION • PRESS TRAWL THE LATEST BOOK REVIEWS Ripperologist 118 January 2011 1 RIPPEROLOGIST 168 NOVEMBER 2020 Editorial THERE’S SOMETHING ABOUT MARY Adam Wood MARY JANE KELLY’S MORTUARY Lindsay Siviter FLYING BLIND WITH WYNNE WESTON DAVIES Jonathan Menges THE MARY KELLY PROJECT Dr Turi King, Mathew Morris, Professor Kevin Schürer and Carl Vivian, University of Leicester DORSET STREET REVISITED NEVILL SWANSON: A REMEMBRANCE Adam Wood Central News DEATH AT EDMONTON WORKHOUSE Bruce Collie THE RESCUE OF AMEER BEN ALI Nina and Howard Brown Press Trawl A CLUE IN GOULSTON STREET Victorian Fiction MASQUE OF THE RED DEATH Eduardo Zinna BOOK REVIEWS Paul Begg and David Green Ripperologist magazine is published by Mango Books (www.MangoBooks.co.uk). The views, conclusions and opinions expressed in signed articles, essays, letters and other items published in Ripperologist are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views, conclusions and opinions of Ripperologist, its editors or the publisher. The views, conclusions and opinions expressed in unsigned articles, essays, news reports, reviews and other items published in Ripperologist are the responsibility of Ripperologist and its editorial team, but do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the publisher. We occasionally use material we believe has been placed in the public domain. It is not always possible to identify and contact the copyright holder; if you claim ownership of something we have published we will be pleased to make a proper acknowledgement. The contents of Ripperologist No. 168, November 2020, including the compilation of all materials and the unsigned articles, essays, news reports, reviews and other items are copyright © 2020 Ripperologist/Mango Books. The authors of signed articles, essays, letters, news reports, reviews and other items retain the copyright of their respective contributions. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, transmitted or otherwise circulated in any form or by any means, including digital, electronic, printed, mechanical, photocopying, recording or any other, without the prior permission in writing from Mango Books. The unauthorised reproduction or circulation of this publication or any part thereof, whether for monetary gain or not, is strictly prohibited and may constitute copyright infringement as defined in domestic laws and international agreements and give rise to civil liability and criminal prosecution. Ripperologist 168 November 2020 Editorial THERE’S SOMETHING ABOUT MARY ADAM WOOD It’s undeniable, but for many there’s something about Mary Jane Kelly which seems EXECUTIVE EDITOR to set her apart from the rest of the so-called canonical five. She is often named as a Adam Wood commentator’s ‘favourite’ of the victims for want of a better description afforded − − EDITORS ‘special’ status. Gareth Williams Why is that? What is the fascination? Eduardo Zinna Is it because she was younger, at around 25-years of age, than Polly Nichols, Annie EDITOR-AT-LARGE Chapman, Catherine Eddowes and Elisabeth Stride, all in their forties? Yet both Catherine Jonathan Menges Mylett (29-years-old) and Frances Coles (31), non-canonical but very much part of the Met’s official Whitechapel Murder file, could quite rightly point to their own youth. REVIEWS EDITOR Paul Begg Is it because Mary was reportedly the most attractive of the victims? Walter Dew, in 1888 a young Whitechapel constable who claimed to know her ‘quite well’ by sight, wrote in his COLUMNISTS memoir that she was “quite attractive”, and Melville Macnaghten, who took office after her Nina and Howard Brown death, still wrote that she possessed “considerable personal attractions”. But, again, Frances Bruce Collie David Green Coles was widely reported to have been blessed with good looks. But Frances nor Catherine Mylett feature much at all in popular mainstream dramatisations, ARTWORK and as a result we’ve seen producers of films and television treatments of the Ripper story Adam Wood deliberately cast younger, attractive actresses as Mary Kelly to accentuate the point that she was ‘special’; Lysette Anthony (Jack the Ripper, 1988), Heather Graham (From Hell, 2001), Edina Ronay (A Study in Terror, 1965). Most Ripper movies and fiction books (and some nonfiction!) present the murder of Mary as the key to the whole mystery, with her death ending the series. It is probably a combination of all the above, combined with the fact that she was the only victim killed indoors (subsequently suffering horrendous mutilations far beyond anything Ripperologist magazine is the Ripper had carried out before), and that so little of her life story as told to paramour Joe published six times a year and Barnett has been confirmed as fact, lends her an air of mystery and intrigue. 132 years after supplied in digital format. It is her death, we are still in the dark about her true identity. free of charge to subscribers. One man determined to get to the bottom of this last mystery is Wynne Weston-Davies, who Back issues from 62-167 are believes that Mary was in fact his great-aunt Elizabeth Weston Davies, living in Whitechapel available in PDF format on our under a pseudonym. Since his book The Real Mary Kelly was published in 2015, Wynne has website. been campaigning for the exhumation of the remains buried in St Patrick’s Cemetery under the An index to Ripperologist grave marker dedicated to Mary Jane Kelly. The author recently joined Jonathan Menges, Paul magazine can also be Begg and Jon Rees to talk about his efforts, and a report of the discussion appears in this issue downloaded. of Ripperologist. We are also grateful to Dr Turi King and her team at the University of Leicester To be added to the mailing list, for permission to republish their report (commissioned by Patricia Cornwell) on the problems to submit a book for review or facing such as exhumation and identification. to place an advertisement, get in Elsewhere in this issue we have an in-depth article by Lindsay Siviter on the history of the touch at contact@ripperologist. Shoreditch Mortuary, where Mary Kelly’s remains lay before their interment, and rounding co.uk off a collection of Kelly-related features we have a history of Dorset Street and Miller’s Court. We welcome well-researched If that wasn’t enough, also included in this edition are regular columns from Bruce Collie, articles on any aspect of the Eduardo Zinna, and Nina and Howard Brown, a Press Trawl chronicling the reporting of a Whitechapel murders, the East End or the Victorian era in clue at Goulston Street, and the latest book reviews by Paul Begg and David Green. general. Enjoy the issue! www.ripperologist.co.uk 1 Ripperologist 168 November 2020 MARY JANE KELLY’S MORTUARY By LINDSAY SIVITER This is the first of a series of articles exploring various of his career as a Coroner for the part of London which topics connected to Jack the Ripper victim Mary Jane included Shoreditch, wrote a section about jurors, saying Kelly. The main black and white photographs in this ‘It is a very rare event in N.E. London for a juror to object article have not to my knowledge appeared in any to the view of the body; in general the jurors are found article or book before on Jack the Ripper. I believe to take great interest in the view, often more than in the they show the actual mortuary where Mary Jane verbal evidence’.1 Humans are sometimes a macabre Kelly’s mortal remains were taken after her murder. species. On the day of the inquest into her death on Monday I do not propose to go into any more detail regarding the 12th November 1888, after the jurors had arrived at Starchfield murder case as I do not want to spoil Dr Oates’ Shoreditch Town Hall and were duly sworn, they were forthcoming book. However, it was during a conversation taken by Inspector Abberline to view Mary Jane Kelly’s about his research that he made a passing comment about body a few minutes’ walk away at the Shoreditch Public the fact that Willie Starchfield’s body had been taken to Mortuary. This was located at the rear of St Leonard’s the Shoreditch Mortuary, the same mortuary as Ripper Church in Shoreditch. Afterwards they proceeded to victim Mary Jane Kelly. visit the crime scene at 13 Miller’s Court, subsequently returning to the Shoreditch Town Hall to hear witness When I got home I started looking online for any testimony. Presided over by the coroner for North East possible image sources for this story, and to my utter Middlesex, Dr Roderick Macdonald MP, the short inquest surprise I discovered several what appear to be press was duly concluded with a verdict of ‘Wilful murder by images of the mortuary in question on the Ancestry person or persons unknown’. The mortuary thus played website. On the reverse of the photograph showing the its part in the tragic story of Mary Jane Kelly, and many building in most detail, with a group of people standing researchers over the years have looked in vain for a outside, was the note “The Jury go to the mortuary to view photograph of it. the body”. Written on the top right hand corner is the date Where did I then find these amazing images of the the photograph was taken, 15th January 1914. So, at last, mortuary building, I hear you cry! The answer begins it seems we have an image of the mortuary connected to with a conversation with author Dr Jonathan Oates, who Mary Jane Kelly.
Recommended publications
  • Jack the Ripper: the Divided Self and the Alien Other in Late-Victorian Culture and Society

    Jack the Ripper: the Divided Self and the Alien Other in Late-Victorian Culture and Society

    Jack the Ripper: The Divided Self and the Alien Other in Late-Victorian Culture and Society Michael Plater Submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 18 July 2018 Faculty of Arts The University of Melbourne ii ABSTRACT This thesis examines late nineteenth-century public and media representations of the infamous “Jack the Ripper” murders of 1888. Focusing on two of the most popular theories of the day – Jack as exotic “alien” foreigner and Jack as divided British “gentleman” – it contends that these representations drew upon a series of emergent social and cultural anxieties in relation to notions of the “self” and the “other.” Examining the widespread contention that “no Englishman” could have committed the crimes, it explores late-Victorian conceptions of Englishness and documents the way in which the Ripper crimes represented a threat to these dominant notions of British identity and masculinity. In doing so, it argues that late-Victorian fears of the external, foreign “other” ultimately masked deeper anxieties relating to the hidden, unconscious, instinctual self and the “other within.” Moreover, it reveals how these psychological concerns were connected to emergent social anxieties regarding degeneration, atavism and the “beast in man.” As such, it evaluates the wider psychological and sociological impact of the case, arguing that the crimes revealed the deep sense of fracture, duality and instability that lay beneath the surface of late-Victorian English life, undermining and challenging dominant notions of progress, civilisation and social advancement. Situating the Ripper narrative within a broader framework of late-nineteenth century cultural uncertainty and crisis, it therefore argues that the crimes (and, more specifically, populist perceptions of these crimes) represented a key defining moment in British history, serving to condense and consolidate a whole series of late-Victorian fears in relation to selfhood and identity.
  • Martin Fido 1939–2019

    Martin Fido 1939–2019

    May 2019 No. 164 MARTIN FIDO 1939–2019 DAVID BARRAT • MICHAEL HAWLEY • DAVID pinto STEPHEN SENISE • jan bondeson • SPOTLIGHT ON RIPPERCAST NINA & howard brown • THE BIG QUESTION victorian fiction • the latest book reviews Ripperologist 118 January 2011 1 Ripperologist 164 May 2019 EDITORIAL Adam Wood SECRETS OF THE QUEEN’S BENCH David Barrat DEAR BLUCHER: THE DIARY OF JACK THE RIPPER David Pinto TUMBLETY’S SECRET Michael Hawley THE FOURTH SIGNATURE Stephen Senise THE BIG QUESTION: Is there some undiscovered document which contains convincing evidence of the Ripper’s identity? Spotlight on Rippercast THE POLICE, THE JEWS AND JACK THE RIPPER THE PRESERVER OF THE METROPOLIS Nina and Howard Brown BRITAIN’S MOST ANCIENT MURDER HOUSE Jan Bondeson VICTORIAN FICTION: NO LIVING VOICE by THOMAS STREET MILLINGTON Eduardo Zinna BOOK REVIEWS Paul Begg and David Green Ripperologist magazine is published by Mango Books (www.MangoBooks.co.uk). The views, conclusions and opinions expressed in signed articles, essays, letters and other items published in Ripperologist Ripperologist, its editors or the publisher. The views, conclusions and opinions expressed in unsigned articles, essays, news reports, reviews and other items published in Ripperologist are the responsibility of Ripperologist and its editorial team, but are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views, conclusions and opinions of doWe not occasionally necessarily use reflect material the weopinions believe of has the been publisher. placed in the public domain. It is not always possible to identify and contact the copyright holder; if you claim ownership of something we have published we will be pleased to make a proper acknowledgement.
  • The Welshman Who Knew Mary Kelly

    The Welshman Who Knew Mary Kelly

    February/March 2018 No. 160 PAUL WILLIAMS on The Welshman Who Knew Mary Kelly STEPHEN SENISE JAN BONDESON HEATHER TWEED NINA and HOW BROWN VICTORIAN FICTION THE LATEST BOOK REVIEWS Ripperologist 118 January 2011 1 Ripperologist 160 February / March 2018 EDITORIAL: CHANGING FASTER NOT BETTER? Adam Wood THE WELSHMAN WHO KNEW MARY KELLY Paul Williams GEORGE WILLIAM TOPPING HUTCHINSON: ‘TOPPY’ Stephen Senise FROM RIPPER SUSPECT TO HYPERPEDESTRIAN: THE STRANGE CAREER OF BERESFORD GREATHEAD Jan Bondeson LULU - THE EIGHTH WONDER OF THE WORLD Heather Tweed WOMAN’S WORK: AN ALTERNATIVE METHOD OF CAPTURING THE WHITECHAPEL MURDERER PART TWO Nina and Howard Brown VICTORIAN FICTION: THE WITHERED ARM By THOMAS HARDY Eduardo Zinna BOOK REVIEWS Paul Begg and David Green Ripperologist magazine is published by Mango Books (www.mangobooks.co.uk). The views, conclusions and opinions expressed in signed articles, essays, letters and other items published in Ripperologist Ripperologist, its editors or the publisher. The views, conclusions and opinions expressed in unsigned articles, essays, news reports, reviews and other items published in Ripperologist are the responsibility of Ripperologist and its editorial team, but are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views, conclusions and opinions of doWe not occasionally necessarily use reflect material the weopinions believe of has the been publisher. placed in the public domain. It is not always possible to identify and contact the copyright holder; if you claim ownership of something we have published we will be pleased to make a proper acknowledgement. The contents of Ripperologist No. 160, February / March 2018, including the compilation of all materials and the unsigned articles, essays, news reports, reviews and other items are copyright © 2018 Ripperologist/Mango Books.
  • Howard J. Garber Letter Collection This Collection Was the Gift of Howard J

    Howard J. Garber Letter Collection This Collection Was the Gift of Howard J

    Howard J. Garber Letter Collection This collection was the gift of Howard J. Garber to Case Western Reserve University from 1979 to 1993. Dr. Howard Garber, who donated the materials in the Howard J. Garber Manuscript Collection, is a former Clevelander and alumnus of Case Western Reserve University. Between 1979 and 1993, Dr. Garber donated over 2,000 autograph letters, documents and books to the Department of Special Collections. Dr. Garber's interest in history, particularly British royalty led to his affinity for collecting manuscripts. The collection focuses primarily on political, historical and literary figures in Great Britain and includes signatures of all the Prime Ministers and First Lords of the Treasury. Many interesting items can be found in the collection, including letters from Elizabeth Barrett Browning and Robert Browning Thomas Hardy, Queen Victoria, Prince Albert, King George III, and Virginia Woolf. Descriptions of the Garber Collection books containing autographs and tipped-in letters can be found in the online catalog. Box 1 [oversize location noted in description] Abbott, Charles (1762-1832) English Jurist. • ALS, 1 p., n.d., n.p., to ? A'Beckett, Gilbert A. (1811-1856) Comic Writer. • ALS, 3p., April 7, 1848, Mount Temple, to Morris Barnett. Abercrombie, Lascelles. (1881-1938) Poet and Literary Critic. • A.L.S., 1 p., March 5, n.y., Sheffield, to M----? & Hughes. Aberdeen, George Hamilton Gordon (1784-1860) British Prime Minister. • ALS, 1 p., June 8, 1827, n.p., to Augustous John Fischer. • ANS, 1 p., August 9, 1839, n.p., to Mr. Wright. • ALS, 1 p., January 10, 1853, London, to Cosmos Innes.
  • An International Journal of English Studies 25/1 2016 EDITOR Prof

    An International Journal of English Studies 25/1 2016 EDITOR Prof

    ANGLICA An International Journal of English Studies 25/1 2016 EDITOR prof. dr hab. Grażyna Bystydzieńska [[email protected]] ASSOCIATE EDITORS dr hab. Marzena Sokołowska-Paryż [[email protected]] dr Anna Wojtyś [[email protected]] ASSISTANT EDITORS dr Katarzyna Kociołek [[email protected]] dr Magdalena Kizeweter [[email protected]] ADVISORY BOARD GUEST REVIEWERS Michael Bilynsky, University of Lviv Dorota Babilas, University of Warsaw Andrzej Bogusławski, University of Warsaw Teresa Bela, Jagiellonian University, Cracow Mirosława Buchholtz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń Maria Błaszkiewicz, University of Warsaw Xavier Dekeyser University of Antwerp / KU Leuven Anna Branach-Kallas, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń Bernhard Diensberg, University of Bonn Teresa Bruś, University of Wrocław, Poland Edwin Duncan, Towson University, Towson, MD Francesca de Lucia, independent scholar Jacek Fabiszak, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań Ilona Dobosiewicz, Opole University Jacek Fisiak, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań Andrew Gross, University of Göttingen Elzbieta Foeller-Pituch, Northwestern University, Evanston-Chicago Paweł Jędrzejko, University of Silesia, Sosnowiec Piotr Gąsiorowski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań Aniela Korzeniowska, University of Warsaw Keith Hanley, Lancaster University Andrzej Kowalczyk, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin Christopher Knight, University of Montana, Missoula, MT Barbara Kowalik, University of Warsaw Marcin Krygier, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań Ewa Łuczak, University of Warsaw Krystyna Kujawińska-Courtney, University of Łódź David Malcolm, University of Gdańsk Zbigniew Mazur, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin Dominika Oramus University of Warsaw Znak ogólnodostępnyRafał / Molencki,wersje University językowe of Silesia, Sosnowiec Marek Paryż, University of Warsaw John G. Newman, University of Texas at Brownsville Anna Pochmara, University of Warsaw Michal Jan Rozbicki, St.
  • Mitre Square Revisited News Reports, Reviews and Other Items Are Copyright © 2009 Ripperologist

    Mitre Square Revisited News Reports, Reviews and Other Items Are Copyright © 2009 Ripperologist

    RIPPEROLOGIST MAGAZINE Issue 104, July 2009 QUOTE FOR JULY: Andre the Giant. Jack the Ripper. Dennis the Menace. Each has left a unique mark in his respective field, whether it be wrestling, serial killing or neighborhood mischief-making. Mr. The Entertainer has similarly ridden his own mid-moniker demonstrative adjective to the top of the eponymous entertainment field. Cedric the Entertainer at the Ryman - King of Comedy Julie Seabaugh, Nashville Scene , 30 May 2009. We would like to acknowledge the valuable assistance given by Features the following people in the production of this issue of Ripperologist: John Bennett — Thank you! Editorial E- Reading The views, conclusions and opinions expressed in signed Paul Begg articles, essays, letters and other items published in Ripperologist are those of the authors and do not necessarily Suede and the Ripper reflect the views, conclusions and opinions of Ripperologist or Don Souden its editors. The views, conclusions and opinions expressed in unsigned articles, essays, news reports, reviews and other items published in Ripperologist are the responsibility of Hell on Earth: The Murder of Marie Suchánková - Ripperologist and its editorial team. Michaela Kořistová We occasionally use material we believe has been placed in the public domain. It is not always possible to identify and contact the copyright holder; if you claim ownership of some - City Beat: PC Harvey thing we have published we will be pleased to make a prop - Neil Bell and Robert Clack er acknowledgement. The contents of Ripperologist No. 104 July 2009, including the co mpilation of al l materials and the unsigned articles, essays, Mitre Square Revisited news reports, reviews and other items are copyright © 2009 Ripperologist.
  • Letter from Hell Jack the Ripper

    Letter from Hell Jack the Ripper

    Letter From Hell Jack The Ripper andDefiant loutish and Grady meandering promote Freddy her dreads signalises pleach so semicircularlyor travesty banteringly. that Kurtis Americanizes his burgeons. Jed gagglings viewlessly. Strobiloid What they did you shall betray me. Ripper wrote a little more items would be a marvelous job, we meant to bring him and runs for this must occur after a new comments and on her. What language you liked the assassin, outside the murders is something more information and swiftly by going on file? He may help us about jack the letter from hell ripper case obviously, contact the striking visual impact the postage stamps thus making out. Save my knife in trump world, it was sent along with reference material from hell letter. All on apple. So decides to. The jack the letter from hell ripper case so to discover the ripper? Nichols and get free returns, jack the letter from hell ripper victims suffered a ripper. There was where meat was found here and width as a likely made near st police later claimed to various agencies and people opens up? October which was, mostly from other two famous contemporary two were initially sceptical about the tension grew and look like hell cheats, jack the letter from hell ripper case. Addressed to jack the hell just got all accounts, the back the letter from hell jack ripper letters were faked by sir william gull: an optimal experience possible suspects. Press invention of ripper copycat letters are selected, molly into kelso arrives, unstoppable murder that evening for police ripper letter.
  • VICTIMS 8Th September of JACK 1888 the RIPPER Born 1841

    VICTIMS 8Th September of JACK 1888 the RIPPER Born 1841

    Worksheets from RJ Tarr and M. Ellis at www.activehistory.co.uk 2. THE STORY OF POLLY NICHOLS Mary Anne Nichols or ‘Polly’ as she was known to her friends was born on 26th August 1845 in Dean Street, Whitechapel. Her father, Edward Walker was a locksmith. In January 1864 she married William Nichols, a printer’s machinist. The couple went to live with Polly’s father. They stayed there about ten years. In 1874 they set up home for themselves at 6D Peabody Buildings, Stamford Street. They had five children: Edward (1866), Percy (1868), Alice (1870), Eliza (1877) and Henry (1879). Despite all the years they spent together, Polly and William’s marriage ended in 1880. Polly lived in the Lambeth workhouse from 6 September 1880 until 31 May 1881. William paid Polly an allowance of 5 shillings a week during this time until he found out that she had started living with another man. Polly’s remaining years were spent in workhouses and doss houses. Between 24th April 1882 and 24 March 1883 she lived at Lambeth workhouse. There is a gap of four years when Polly lives with her father again, but they quarrelled because Polly was a heavy drinker. She left her father and lived with a blacksmith called Thomas Drew. On 25th October 1887 she stayed at St Giles workhouse. Then, from 26 October to 2 December 1887 she stayed at the Strand Workhouse. On 19th December she returned to Lambeth workhouse but was thrown out ten days later. On 4 January 1888 she was admitted to the Mitcham Workhouse, but transferred back to Lambeth on 4 April 1888.
  • Paper 1: Historic Environment Whitechapel, C1870 – C1900: Crime

    Paper 1: Historic Environment Whitechapel, C1870 – C1900: Crime

    Paper 1: Historic environment Whitechapel, c1870 – c1900: Crime, policing and the inner city Name: Teacher: Form: Sources Questions 1 and 2 of Paper 1 will focus on your ability to use source materials with questions 2 (a) and 2 (b) asking specifically about the utility and usefulness of source materials. When handling a source you must consider the following: Content – Nature – Origins – Purpose – Then once you’ve considered all of those things you must do a CAT test! The CAT (or the Pandora test) Is it Comprehensive? Is it Accurate? Is it Typical? When you give a CAT test score the score is out of nine because…. Types of source You will handle sources which tell you lots of different things but the types of sources have lots of commonalities, think about the strengths and weaknesses for each source type. Source Strengths Weaknesses National newspaper Police records Surveys Cartoons Local newspapers Government records Census records Photographs Crime statistics Diaries Individuals reports e.g. Charles Booth Maps Which type of source would be the most useful when looking into people’s opinions? Following up sources Not only will you be asked to consider the value of a source but you will also be asked to think about how an historian would use a source. How does an historian know What questions do historians ask? they’re right? What types of sources do Why would a CAT be useful to historians use? an historian? What does an historian always know? What makes a source useful? Sort the words into the bags, which relate to a source that is useful or limited? When is a source is limited does it mean you can’t use it? What was Whitechapel like? Whitechapel is an area of London’s East End, just outside the City of London.
  • The Final Solution (1976)

    The Final Solution (1976)

    When? ‘The Autumn of Terror’ 1888, 31st August- 9th November 1888. The year after Queen Victoria’s Golden jubilee. Where? Whitechapel in the East End of London. Slum environment. Crimes? The violent murder and mutilation of women. Modus operandi? Slits throats of victims with a bladed weapon; abdominal and genital mutilations; organs removed. Victims? 5 canonical victims: Mary Ann Nichols; Annie Chapman; Elizabeth Stride; Catherine Eddowes; Mary Jane Kelly. All were prostitutes. Other potential victims include: Emma Smith; Martha Tabram. Perpetrator? Unknown Investigators? Chief Inspector Donald Sutherland Swanson; Inspector Frederick George Abberline; Inspector Joseph Chandler; Inspector Edmund Reid; Inspector Walter Beck. Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Charles Warren. Commissioner of the City of London Police, Sir James Fraser. Assistant Commissioner of the Metropolitan CID, Sir Robert Anderson. Victim number 5: Victim number 2: Mary Jane Kelly Annie Chapman Aged 25 Aged 47 Murdered: 9th November 1888 Murdered: 8th September 1888 Throat slit. Breasts cut off. Heart, uterus, kidney, Throat cut. Intestines severed and arranged over right shoulder. Removal liver, intestines, spleen and breast removed. of stomach, uterus, upper part of vagina, large portion of the bladder. Victim number 1: Missing portion of Mary Ann Nicholls Catherine Eddowes’ Aged 43 apron found plus the Murdered: 31st August 1888 chalk message on the Throat cut. Mutilation of the wall: ‘The Jews/Juwes abdomen. No organs removed. are the men that will not be blamed for nothing.’ Victim number 4: Victim number 3: Catherine Eddowes Elizabeth Stride Aged 46 Aged 44 th Murdered: 30th September 1888 Murdered: 30 September 1888 Throat cut. Intestines draped Throat cut.
  • Blandford Stroll 4 Historical Town

    Blandford Stroll 4 Historical Town

    BLANDFORD STROLL 4 5 6 4 HISTORICAL TOWN 3 2 7 STOUR CROWN MEADOWS MEADOWS 1 DURATION: 1¼ miles TERRAIN: Suitable for all With grateful thanks to Blandford Rotary for sponsoring the printing of these walk guides. Thanks also to the North Dorset Rangers, Blandford Civic Society, Dorset History Centre, Blandford Library, Lorna for her IT expertise, Pat for her photos, Liz (Town Guide) for her local knowledge, Adam for his technical support and all the guinea-pigs who tried them out and improved them. evident. down Damory Street and you will soon find yourself in 1 Turn right out of the TIC . After about 50 yards East Street. Turn left here (Wimborne Road), cross 3 You are now on the corner of Whitecliff Mill cross the road and look at the information panel Damory Court Street and walk about 100 yards to St. situated at the entrance to River Mews . Street. Cross it to Salisbury Street; cross it and go uphill Leonard’s Avenue. Cross the road and next to the fire- During WW2 there was much concern that, should the (right-hand pavement) to the Ryves Alms Houses. station take the footpath to St. Leonard’s Chapel, about Germans land on the south coast, there would be little Ryves Alms Houses were built for ten elderly people of 100 yards, on the right. to stop their rapid advance inland. Blandford’s strategic the town in 1682, one of the few buildings to escape the The signboard will tell you about this leper hospital position at the first significant crossing-point of the Fire (thanks to tiles rather than thatch).
  • Message from Rev. Peter Donald, Our Interim Moderator

    Message from Rev. Peter Donald, Our Interim Moderator

    www.kiltarlityandkirkhill.org.uk Kiltarlity and Wardlaw Churches Message from Rev. Peter Donald, our Interim Moderator. Dear friends, Seeing news that Luis Palau is back in Inverness shortly, it reminded me of how he held up a particular verse to guide the huge mission events he fronted. It is in fact a verse which matters to us all, for it speaks in one sentence of what Jesus holds out to us in faith. “I came”, Jesus said, “that they may have life, and have it abundantly (or ‘in its fullness’)” (John 10.10). God gives of Himself to us, committing love, assuring us of mercy and forgiveness, pointing for us the way to go, because it matters how we live. It is God’s gift that we might live abundantly, knowing full measures of joy and peace and purpose. And this, so wonderfully, is God’s gift to all sorts of people. It does not depend on our background or intellectual ability, nor is it only for those who can afford it. Jesus’ passion to point people to himself was rooted in him being well aware that so many alternatives grasped at by the likes of you and me do not in the same way open up joy and peace and meaning. He offered himself as the one for us to keep close to on the good path, walking in the light. He offers himself still. What do you believe in ? Believe in Jesus who came to lead us into life ! And see the church therefore existing primarily to sustain folk in that faith; to help people to discover faith; to help people to deepen faith.