DOCSLIB.ORG

The Secret Deep Stephen James O’Meara Index More Information

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Secret Deep Stephen James O’Meara Index More Information Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-19876-9 - Deep-Sky Companions: The Secret Deep Stephen James O’Meara Index More information Index 3C 48, 253, 254 Barnard, Edward Emerson, Cat Scratch Galaxy see NGC 5907 3C 273 (Secret Deep 9), 253–255 117–118, 119, 306, 346–347, CEab Cassiopeiae, 461, 462 9 “Stitchpunks” (Stock 2), 39–41 357, 375, 409 Cederblad, Sven, 437 47 Tucanae, 331 Barnard’s Loop (Sh2-276), 116, Celestial Handbook, Burnham’s, 27 120–121, 410 Cepheids, 461 A Descent into the Maelstrom, 170 Barth, Aaron J., 193 Ceres, 263 A Photographic Atlas of Selected Basel 3, 456 CF Cassiopeiae, 461, 462 Regions of the Milky Way, 409 Bauval, Robert, 105 Chandra X-Ray Observatory Abell, George O., 361 BD þ651637, 437 (spacecraft), 177, 192, 255, Abramenkov E. A., 116 BD þ651638, 437 263, 307, 308 ACS Nearby Galaxy Survey Treasury Bedke, J., 268 Cheeseburger Nebula see Secret (ANGST) program, 176 Bekmambetov, Timur, 41 Deep 101 active galactic nucleus (AGN), 171, Bellazzini, Michele, 139, 227 Chen, W. P., 129 192–193, 215, 219, 220, 223, Bennett, Jack, 331 Cepheus Bubble, 437, 441 231, 241 Bigourdan, Camille Guillaume, Cepheus OB2 association, 437, ADS 5817, 149, 150 360–361, 435–436 441, 443 Albuquerque Astronomical black holes, 220–221, 240, 241, 258, Cheshire Cat asterism, 99 Society, 136 259, 392–394 Chies-Santos, A. L., 293 Alcala´, Juan, 89 Blue Flash Nebula see NGC 6905 Christensen, Tommy, 388, 389–390 Alessi J20046–1030, 397 Bode, Johann, 134 Chu, Y.-H., 365, 366 Alessi J20053þ4732 see O’Meara 3 Bohigas, J., 302 Clymer, William F., 124 Alessi J23407þ0757, 397 Bolton, Charles Thomas, 393 Coccato, Lodovico, 241 Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland, Bonato, C., 101 Coe, Steve, 96 99, 457 Bond, George Phillips, 282 Cohen, Martin, 81, 143, 144 Allen, Richard Hinkley, 181 Bond, Howard, 112 Collinder, 104–109 Aller, Lawrence H., 327, 426 Borissova, Jura, 317, 318 Collinder 70 (Secret Deep 24), Alpha Persei Moving Cluster, 52, 69 Boulade, Olivier, 283 104–109, 130 Anandaro, B. G., 75–76 Bowyer, S., 392 Collinder 121, 130 Anderson, M. F., 94 Boyd, Lyle Gifford, 124 Collinder, 463 (Secret Deep 5), Andreuzzi, Gloria, 421 Box Nebula see NGC 6309 35–37 Andrievsky, Sergey M., 357 Brain Nebula see NGC 7538 Collinder 465, 147 Antares, 308 Bratton, Mark, 436 Collinder 466, 147 Apollonius, 154 Bright Spiral Galaxy Survey, Collinder, Per Arne, 36, 106, 361 Arbour, Ron, 184 206, 231 Collins, Peter, 111, 312 Archinal, Brent A., 7, 40, 360, 397 Bril, Henk, 209–210 Coma Berenices Cluster, 61 Arentoft, T., 94 Broken Heart see NGC 2281 comets Arias, Lorena, 153 Bruce Lee Cluster see NGC 7160 9P/Tempel Arion, Douglas N., 162 Burke, Christopher J., 53 17P/Holmes, 60–61 Arp, Halton, 192, 239, 357 Burnham, Sherbourne Wesley, 55P/Tempel–Tuttle Aryal, Binil, 76 425–426 C/1969 Y1 (Comet Bennett), 331 Asselin, Louis, 21 Burnham’s Nebula see NGC 7026 of 1746 (De Cheseaux’s), 61 asymptotic giant branch (AGB) Burton, Tim, 41 of 1758, 61 Stars, 76, 112, 162, 327, Buta, Ron, 265 Copeland, Leland, 239 342, 401, 426 Copeland, Ralph, 400–401 Atlas Ce´leste (Fortin’s), 210 Cacace, Ben, 99 Copeland’s Septet, 400 Atlas of Peculiar Galaxies, 192, 239 Caged Spirit Nebula see NGC 6905 Copernicus (journal), 400 Atlas of the Heavens, 191 California Nebula, 118, 119 core-collapse clusters, 337 Aveni, Anthony, 105 Canis Major dwarf, 139–140, 141 Corradi, Romano L. M., 186–187, Canis Major OB1 association, 303 Baade, Walter, 226, 336, 337 148–149 Corwin, Hal, 108, 248–249, 263, 347, Baade Window, 336 Canis Major R1 association, 148 360–361, 375–376, 436–437 Bailey, Solon Irving, 124, 317 Cannistra, Steve, 99 Cosmic Bat see NGC 1788 Balaguer-Nu´n˜ez, L., 94 Cappa, C. E., 157 Cosmic Butterflies, 431 Balick, Bruce, 404 Capuchin, De Rhieta, 184 Cosmic Rosebud see NGC 7129 Bally, John, 130 Carnegie Atlas of Galaxies, 202, 268 Cox, P., 342 Barbon, Roberto, 456 Carney, Bruce W., 322–323 Crawford, Earl of, 400 Barbuy, Beatriz, 337 Carroll, Lewis, 457 Crimson Butterfly see NGC 2346 Barkhatova, Klavdiia Carswell, Robert F., 313 Crystal Ball (NGC 1514), 74–77 Aleksandrovna, 389 Cassiopeia OB2 association, Cuesta, Luis, 415 Barnard 139, 375 455, 456 Cuffey, James, 84, 85 Index 477 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-19876-9 - Deep-Sky Companions: The Secret Deep Stephen James O’Meara Index More information Curtis, Heber Doust, 161, 302, 317, Eta Carinae, 198 Gondoin, Philippe, 192 327, 365, 431, 450 European Southern Observatory, 89 Goodriche, John, 451 Cygnus OB2 association, 409 EV Scuti, 357, 358 Goudfrooij, Paul, 293 Cygnus OB3 association, 394 Evans, Inese I., 227 Gould, Andrew, 65 Cygnus OB9 association, 409 Evans, Aneurin (Nye), 332 Gowney, Kim, 406 Cygnus Rift, 442 Evans, Robert, 45, 184 Gramer, Lew, 329 Cygnus Star Cloud, 409 event horizon, 393 Great Nebula in Auriga, 100 Cygnus Superbubble, 409 Ewing, Anne, 393 Grebel, Eva K., 287, 288 Cygnus X-1 (Secret Deep 93), Exclamation Mark see NGC 6309 Greenstein, Jesse, 254 392–394 extragalactic radio source Gregory, Robert L., 119 Cygnus X complex, 409, 410 (EGRS), 171 Guerrero, Martin A., 384, 401 Czyzak, S. J., 327 Eye and Brain, 119 Gupta, Alok C., 462 Eyes, The, see NGC 4435 and Gutermuth, Rob, 438 d’Arrest, Heinrich Louis, 84, 85, NGC 4438 132, 317 Hajian, Arsen, 366 Dal Farra, E., 211 Fabian, Walter, 176 Hale, George Ellery, 306 Dame, Thomas M., 130 Faith, Edward, 219 Halley, Edmond, 276 Dandelion Puff Ball see NGC 6751 Feibelman, Walter, 76, 415, 426 Haro, Guillermo, 21 Darth Vader’s Starfighter see NGC Fellhauer, Michael, 287 Harrington, J. Patrick, 450 936 Feltzing, Sofia, 336, 337 Harris, Hugh C., 282 Davies, Richard I., 192 Filho, M. E., 231 Hartmann, Johannes, 107 Davis, Helen, 317 Fisher, David, 222 Harvard College Observatory, 124 Deep-Impact (space probe), 326 Flammarion, Camille, 281 Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Deep Space Network, 231 Fleming, Williamina Paton, Astrophysics, 220 Deharveng, L., 70 123–124, 301–302 Hartung, Ernst J., 156 de Lalande. Joseph Je´rome le FLIERs, 401 Hassan, Samia M., 456 Franc¸ais, 210 Fly see NGC 1931 HD 10494, 32 Deliyannis, Constantine, 167 Flying Eye see NGC 2359 HD 167638, 348 Delta Cephei, 451 Flying Geese Cluster see NGC 6939 HD 167815, 348 Delta Ceti, 43 Forbes, Duncan A., 139–140, 361 HD 293815, 90–91 Delta Cygni, 390 Fortin, F., 210 HD 313094 þ HD 313095, 348 Delta Scuti stars, 94–95 Fossil Footprint see NGC 1491 HD 54387, 148 Delta Virginis, 265 Foster, D. C., 40 HD 56925, 157 de Vaucouleurs, Gerard, 268 Foxface Nebula see NGC 1788 HDE 226868 see Cygnus X-1 Dewangan, G. C., 269 Freeland, Emily, 167 Heiles, Carl, 130, 132 Diamond Ring Nebula see NGC Friel, Eileen D., 226 Henry Draper Extension (HDE) 6844 From the Earth to the Moon, 181 catalogue, 393 Djorgovski, S. George, 226 Frost, Edwin B., 426 Herbig, George, 21, 80 Dormouse Cluster see NGC 7510 Fuchs, Burkhard, 28 Herbig–Haro objects, 20–21, 84, 437 Double Bubble Nebula see NGC Fuentes-Carrera, I., 206 Hermann, Armin, 377 2371-2 Fuzzy Butterfly see NGC 654 Hernandez-Toledo, Hector M., 205 Double Cluster, 32, 39, 94, 370 Herschel, Caroline, 36, 100, Dreyer, John Louis Emil, 84, 129, Galadı´-Enrı´quez, David, 85 147, 430 143, 182, 296, 302, 326, 360, Gamma Cygni, 412 Herschel, John, 5, 23, 94, 95, 107, 364, 375, 400, 409, 431, 436 Gamma Leonis (STF 1424AB), 193 113, 139, 156, 181, 184, 263, Doublemint Cluster see NGC 33.27 Garrido, O., 206 341, 360, 364, 375–376, 383, Duck Head Nebula see NGC 2359 Gemini School Astronomy Contest 414, 430, 435 Dunlop, James, 23–24, 138, 341 (2009), 365 Herschel satellite, 438 Dust Devil see NGC 4753 General Theory of Relativity, 393 Herschel, William, 5, 43, 61, 75, Georgics, 301 84, 85, 94, 100, 101, 107, Eagles, The, 393 Gerasimenko, Tatya P., 357 132, 134, 143, 152, 161, Einstein, Albert, 393 Ghost Globular see NGC 5466 181, 188, 193, 201, 207, Elvis, Martin, 221 Ghost of the Moon see NGC 6781 263, 282, 307, 316, 321, English, Jayanne, 197 giant molecular cloud, 371 336, 352, 356, 360, 364, Eridanus Bubble, 121 Giant Squid see NGC 134 379, 383, 409, 414, 430, Eridanus Cluster of galaxies, 65 Gibbon, Edward, 107 435, 449, 457, 461 Eridanus A subcluster of galaxies, Gilbert, Adrian, 105 Herschel’s Region 27 (part of 65 Gingerich, Owen, 209, 281, 282 Barnard’s Loop), 117–120 Eskridge, Paul B., 202, 230 Glowing Eye Nebula see NGC 6751 Hertzsprung–Russell (HR) diagram, ESO 350-G21, 24 Gnedin, Oleg Y., 317–318 95, 112, 162, 336, 353 478 Index © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-19876-9 - Deep-Sky Companions: The Secret Deep Stephen James O’Meara Index More information Hevelius, Johannes, 181, 196–197, Jones, Bessie Zaban, 124 Mayall, Nicholas Ulrich, 226 445 Jose, Jessy, 100 M1, 61 Hiriart, D., 380 M7, 2, 138 History of the Decline and Fall of the Kaler, James, 265, 412, 443 M9, 331 Roman Empire, 107 Kaluzny, J., 421 M11, 357 Ho, Luis C., 220, 245 Kastner, Joel H., 431 M13, 139, 226, 312 Hogsten, Scott, 377 Kay, Jenni, 349–350 M15, 337 Holden, Edward, 426, 427 Kenney, Jeffrey, 240 M23, 389 Hole in a Cluster see NGC 6811 Key Project (HST), 236 M26, 357 Hopwood, Madelaine, 332 Kharchenko, Nina, V., 135, 456 M30, 337 Horsehead Nebula, 108 Kick the Can Cluster see NGC 4147 M34, 52, 61, 69 Houston, Walter Scott, 56, 85, 134, Kilauea (Hawaii Volcanoes National M35, 36 178, 309, 388–389, 404 Park), 3–4 M36, 99, 100 HT Ursae Majoris, 206 Kissing Crescents see NGC 2022 M37, 100 Hubble, Edwin P., 219, 244, 268 Kitt Peak National Observatory, 167 M38, 99, 100 Hubble Atlas, 282 Klemola, Arnold Richard, 194 M41, 65 Huggins, William, 75, 317, 384, 449 Knife-Edge Galaxy see NGC 5907 M42, 70, 88, 89, 109, 129, 130, Humphreys, Elizabeth M.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Filter Performance Comparisons for Some Common Nebulae
    Filter Performance Comparisons For Some Common Nebulae By Dave Knisely Light Pollution and various “nebula” filters have been around since the late 1970’s, and amateurs have been using them ever since to bring out detail (and even some objects) which were difficult to impossible to see before in modest apertures. When I started using them in the early 1980’s, specific information about which filter might work on a given object (or even whether certain filters were useful at all) was often hard to come by. Even those accounts that were available often had incomplete or inaccurate information. Getting some observational experience with the Lumicon line of filters helped, but there were still some unanswered questions. I wondered how the various filters would rank on- average against each other for a large number of objects, and whether there was a “best overall” filter. In particular, I also wondered if the much-maligned H-Beta filter was useful on more objects than the two or three targets most often mentioned in publications. In the summer of 1999, I decided to begin some more comprehensive observations to try and answer these questions and determine how to best use these filters overall. I formulated a basic survey covering a moderate number of emission and planetary nebulae to obtain some statistics on filter performance to try to address the following questions: 1. How do the various filter types compare as to what (on average) they show on a given nebula? 2. Is there one overall “best” nebula filter which will work on the largest number of objects? 3.
    [Show full text]
  • CO Multi-Line Imaging of Nearby Galaxies (COMING) IV. Overview Of
    Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan (2018) 00(0), 1–33 1 doi: 10.1093/pasj/xxx000 CO Multi-line Imaging of Nearby Galaxies (COMING) IV. Overview of the Project Kazuo SORAI1, 2, 3, 4, 5, Nario KUNO4, 5, Kazuyuki MURAOKA6, Yusuke MIYAMOTO7, 8, Hiroyuki KANEKO7, Hiroyuki NAKANISHI9 , Naomasa NAKAI4, 5, 10, Kazuki YANAGITANI6 , Takahiro TANAKA4, Yuya SATO4, Dragan SALAK10, Michiko UMEI2 , Kana MOROKUMA-MATSUI7, 8, 11, 12, Naoko MATSUMOTO13, 14, Saeko UENO9, Hsi-An PAN15, Yuto NOMA10, Tsutomu, T. TAKEUCHI16 , Moe YODA16, Mayu KURODA6, Atsushi YASUDA4 , Yoshiyuki YAJIMA2 , Nagisa OI17, Shugo SHIBATA2, Masumichi SETA10, Yoshimasa WATANABE4, 5, 18, Shoichiro KITA4, Ryusei KOMATSUZAKI4 , Ayumi KAJIKAWA2, 3, Yu YASHIMA2, 3, Suchetha COORAY16 , Hiroyuki BAJI6 , Yoko SEGAWA2 , Takami TASHIRO2 , Miho TAKEDA6, Nozomi KISHIDA2 , Takuya HATAKEYAMA4 , Yuto TOMIYASU4 and Chey SAITA9 1Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Kita 10 Nishi 8, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan 2Department of Cosmosciences, Graduate School of Science, Hokkaido University, Kita 10 Nishi 8, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan 3Department of Physics, School of Science, Hokkaido University, Kita 10 Nishi 8, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan 4Division of Physics, Faculty of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8571, Japan 5Tomonaga Center for the History of the Universe (TCHoU), University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8571, Japan 6Department of Physical Science, Osaka Prefecture University, Gakuen 1-1,
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Constellations
    Winter Constellations *Orion *Canis Major *Monoceros *Canis Minor *Gemini *Auriga *Taurus *Eradinus *Lepus *Monoceros *Cancer *Lynx *Ursa Major *Ursa Minor *Draco *Camelopardalis *Cassiopeia *Cepheus *Andromeda *Perseus *Lacerta *Pegasus *Triangulum *Aries *Pisces *Cetus *Leo (rising) *Hydra (rising) *Canes Venatici (rising) Orion--Myth: Orion, the great ​ ​ hunter. In one myth, Orion boasted he would kill all the wild animals on the earth. But, the earth goddess Gaia, who was the protector of all animals, produced a gigantic scorpion, whose body was so heavily encased that Orion was unable to pierce through the armour, and was himself stung to death. His companion Artemis was greatly saddened and arranged for Orion to be immortalised among the stars. Scorpius, the scorpion, was placed on the opposite side of the sky so that Orion would never be hurt by it again. To this day, Orion is never seen in the sky at the same time as Scorpius. DSO’s ● ***M42 “Orion Nebula” (Neb) with Trapezium A stellar ​ ​ ​ nursery where new stars are being born, perhaps a thousand stars. These are immense clouds of interstellar gas and dust collapse inward to form stars, mainly of ionized hydrogen which gives off the red glow so dominant, and also ionized greenish oxygen gas. The youngest stars may be less than 300,000 years old, even as young as 10,000 years old (compared to the Sun, 4.6 billion years old). 1300 ly. ​ ​ 1 ● *M43--(Neb) “De Marin’s Nebula” The star-forming ​ “comma-shaped” region connected to the Orion Nebula. ● *M78--(Neb) Hard to see. A star-forming region connected to the ​ Orion Nebula.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Arp - AM # Order
    Southern Arp - AM # Order A B C D E F G H I J 1 AM # Constellation Object Name RA DEC Mag. Size Uranom. Uranom. Millenium 2 1st Ed. 2nd Ed. 3 AM 0003-414 Phoenix ESO 293-G034 00h06m19.9s -41d30m00s 13.7 3.2 x 1.0 386 177 430 Vol I 4 AM 0006-340 Sculptor NGC 10 00h08m34.5s -33d51m30s 13.3 2.4 x 1.2 350 159 410 Vol I 5 AM 0007-251 Sculptor NGC 24 00h09m56.5s -24d57m47s 12.4 5.8 x 1.3 305 141 366 Vol I 6 AM 0011-232 Cetus NGC 45 00h14m04.0s -23d10m55s 11.6 8.5 x 5.9 305 141 366 Vol I 7 AM 0027-333 Sculptor NGC 134 00h30m22.0s -33d14m39s 11.4 8.5 x 2.0 351 159 409 Vol I 8 AM 0029-643 Tucana ESO 079- G003 00h32m02.2s -64d15m12s 12.6 2.7 x 0.4 440 204 409 Vol I 9 AM 0031-280B Sculptor NGC 150 00h34m15.5s -27d48m13s 12 3.9 x 1.9 306 141 387 Vol I 10 AM 0031-320 Sculptor NGC 148 00h34m15.5s -31d47m10s 13.3 2 x 0.8 351 159 387 Vol I 11 AM 0033-253 Sculptor IC 1558 00h35m47.1s -25d22m28s 12.6 3.4 x 2.5 306 141 365 Vol I 12 AM 0041-502 Phoenix NGC 238 00h43m25.7s -50d10m58s 13.1 1.9 x 1.6 417 177 449 Vol I 13 AM 0045-314 Sculptor NGC 254 00h47m27.6s -31d25m18s 12.6 2.5 x 1.5 351 176 386 Vol I 14 AM 0050-312 Sculptor NGC 289 00h52m42.3s -31d12m21s 11.7 5.1 x 3.6 351 176 386 Vol I 15 AM 0052-375 Sculptor NGC 300 00h54m53.5s -37d41m04s 9 22 x 16 351 176 408 Vol I 16 AM 0106-803 Hydrus ESO 013- G012 01h07m02.2s -80d18m28s 13.6 2.8 x 0.9 460 214 509 Vol I 17 AM 0105-471 Phoenix IC 1625 01h07m42.6s -46d54m27s 12.9 1.7 x 1.2 387 191 448 Vol I 18 AM 0108-302 Sculptor NGC 418 01h10m35.6s -30d13m17s 13.1 2 x 1.7 352 176 385 Vol I 19 AM 0110-583 Hydrus NGC
    [Show full text]
  • The Radio Properties of a Complete Sample of Bright Galaxies
    Aust. J. Phys., 1982,35,321-50 The Radio Properties of a Complete Sample of Bright Galaxies J. I. Harnett School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, N.S.W. 2006. Abstract Results are given for the radio continuum properties of an optically complete sample of 294 bright galaxies, 147 of which have been detected. Data were obtained with the 408 MHz Molonglo Radio Telescope. The radio luminosity functions for all galaxies and for spiral galaxies alone are derived and the radio emission for different galaxy types is investigated. Spectral indices of 73 galaxies which had been detected at other frequencies were derived; the mean index of a reliable subsample is <ex) = -0,71. 1. Introduction There have been many extensive surveys of continuum radio emission from bright galaxies. The earliest comprehensive survey of high sensitivity was that of Cameron (1971a, 1971b) using the Molonglo Cross Radio Telescope at 408 MHz. Cameron observed two optically complete samples south of b = + 18° and defined the radio luminosity function with reasonable statistics at radio powers of ~ 1022 W HZ-I. In the past decade the optical properties of galaxies have been revised so that the selection of an optically complete sample is more reliable. In addition, between 1970 and 1978 the sensitivity of the 408 MHz Molonglo Cross was improved by more than a magnitude, permitting more detections and more accurate measurements of weak' radio emission. Before observations at 408 MHz with the Molonglo Cross ceased in 1978, a new survey was made to improve Cameron's results and provide the best possible data base for subsequent investigations at different frequencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Ghost Hunt Challenge 2020
    Virtual Ghost Hunt Challenge 10/21 /2020 (Sorry we can meet in person this year or give out awards but try doing this challenge on your own.) Participant’s Name _________________________ Categories for the competition: Manual Telescope Electronically Aided Telescope Binocular Astrophotography (best photo) (if you expect to compete in more than one category please fill-out a sheet for each) ** There are four objects on this list that may be beyond the reach of beginning astronomers or basic telescopes. Therefore, we have marked these objects with an * and provided alternate replacements for you just below the designated entry. We will use the primary objects to break a tie if that’s needed. Page 1 TAS Ghost Hunt Challenge - Page 2 Time # Designation Type Con. RA Dec. Mag. Size Common Name Observed Facing West – 7:30 8:30 p.m. 1 M17 EN Sgr 18h21’ -16˚11’ 6.0 40’x30’ Omega Nebula 2 M16 EN Ser 18h19’ -13˚47 6.0 17’ by 14’ Ghost Puppet Nebula 3 M10 GC Oph 16h58’ -04˚08’ 6.6 20’ 4 M12 GC Oph 16h48’ -01˚59’ 6.7 16’ 5 M51 Gal CVn 13h30’ 47h05’’ 8.0 13.8’x11.8’ Whirlpool Facing West - 8:30 – 9:00 p.m. 6 M101 GAL UMa 14h03’ 54˚15’ 7.9 24x22.9’ 7 NGC 6572 PN Oph 18h12’ 06˚51’ 7.3 16”x13” Emerald Eye 8 NGC 6426 GC Oph 17h46’ 03˚10’ 11.0 4.2’ 9 NGC 6633 OC Oph 18h28’ 06˚31’ 4.6 20’ Tweedledum 10 IC 4756 OC Ser 18h40’ 05˚28” 4.6 39’ Tweedledee 11 M26 OC Sct 18h46’ -09˚22’ 8.0 7.0’ 12 NGC 6712 GC Sct 18h54’ -08˚41’ 8.1 9.8’ 13 M13 GC Her 16h42’ 36˚25’ 5.8 20’ Great Hercules Cluster 14 NGC 6709 OC Aql 18h52’ 10˚21’ 6.7 14’ Flying Unicorn 15 M71 GC Sge 19h55’ 18˚50’ 8.2 7’ 16 M27 PN Vul 20h00’ 22˚43’ 7.3 8’x6’ Dumbbell Nebula 17 M56 GC Lyr 19h17’ 30˚13 8.3 9’ 18 M57 PN Lyr 18h54’ 33˚03’ 8.8 1.4’x1.1’ Ring Nebula 19 M92 GC Her 17h18’ 43˚07’ 6.44 14’ 20 M72 GC Aqr 20h54’ -12˚32’ 9.2 6’ Facing West - 9 – 10 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cheshire Cat Gravitational Lens: the Formation of a Massive Fossil Group
    THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA University Libraries The Cheshire Cat Gravitational Lens: The Formation of a Massive Fossil Group Jimmy A. Irwin – University of Alabama et al. Deposited 09/10/2018 Citation of published version: Irwin, J., et al. (2015): The Cheshire Cat Gravitational Lens: The Formation of a Massive Fossil Group. The Astrophysical Journal, 806(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004- 637X/806/2/268 © 2015. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. The Astrophysical Journal, 806:268 (14pp), 2015 June 20 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/268 © 2015. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. THE CHESHIRE CAT GRAVITATIONAL LENS: THE FORMATION OF A MASSIVE FOSSIL GROUP Jimmy A. Irwin1, Renato Dupke1,2,3,4, Eleazar R. Carrasco5, W. Peter Maksym1, Lucas Johnson1, and Raymond E. White III1 1 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Alabama, Box 870324, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Astronomy, University of Michigan, 500 Church St., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA 3 Observatório Nacional, Rua Gal. José Cristino 77, São Cristóvão, CEP20921-400 Rio de Janeiro RJ, Brazil 4 Eureka Scientific Inc., 2452 Delmer St. Suite 100, Oakland, CA 94602, USA 5 Gemini Observatory/AURA, Southern Operations Center, AURA, Casilla 603, La Serena, Chile Received 2014 July 4; accepted 2015 April 28; published 2015 June 23 ABSTRACT The Cheshire Cat is a relatively poor group of galaxies dominated by two luminous elliptical galaxies surrounded by at least four arcs from gravitationally lensed background galaxies that give the system a humorous appearance. Our combined optical/X-ray study of this system reveals that it is experiencing a line of sight merger between two groups with a roughly equal mass ratio with a relative velocity of ∼1350 km s−1.
    [Show full text]
  • Breaking the Radio – Gamma-Ray Connection in Arp 220
    MNRAS 000, 000{000 (0000) Preprint 16 January 2019 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0 Breaking the Radio { Gamma-Ray Connection in Arp 220 Tova M. Yoast-Hull? and Norman Murrayy Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Toronto, ON, M5S 3H8, Canada 16 January 2019 ABSTRACT Recent analyses of the γ-ray spectrum from the ultra-luminous infrared galaxy Arp 220 have revealed a discrepancy in the cosmic ray energy injection rates derived from the γ-rays versus the radio emission. While the observed radio emission is consistent with the star formation rate inferred from infrared observations, a significantly higher cosmic ray population is necessary to accurately model the measured γ-ray flux. To resolve this discrepancy between the radio and γ-ray observations, we find that we must increase the cosmic ray energy injection rate and account for an infrared optical depth greater than unity. Raising the energy injection rate naturally raises the total γ-ray flux but also raises the radio flux unless there is also an increase in the energy loss rate for cosmic ray leptons. A optically thick medium results in an increase in energy losses via inverse Compton for cosmic ray leptons and preserves agreement with submillimeter, millimeter, and infrared wavelength observations. Key words: cosmic rays { galaxies: individual (Arp 220) { galaxies: starburst { gamma rays: galaxies { radiative transfer { radio continuum: galaxies 1 INTRODUCTION collide with the ISM to produce neutral pions that subse- quently decay into γ-rays. Over the past decade, eight star-forming galaxies (mostly gi- In our current understanding, the correlation between ant spirals) have been detected in γ-rays by Fermi, including radio and FIR emission seen in star-forming galaxies requires M31 (NGC 0224), NGC 0253, NGC 1068, NGC 2146, M82 two additional conditions to hold.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Clusters in Gaia
    Sede Amministrativa: Università degli Studi di Padova Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia “G. Galilei” Corso di Dottorato di Ricerca in Astronomia Ciclo XXX OPEN CLUSTERS IN GAIA ERA Coordinatore: Ch.mo Prof. Giampaolo Piotto Supervisore: Dr.ssa Antonella Vallenari Dottorando: Francesco Pensabene i Abstract Context. Open clusters (OCs) are optimal tracers of the Milky Way disc. They are observed at every distance from the Galactic center and their ages cover the entire lifespan of the disc. The actual OC census contain more than 3000 objects, but suffers of incom- pleteness out of the solar neighborhood and of large inhomogeneity in the parameter deter- minations present in literature. Both these aspects will be improved by the on-going space mission Gaia . In the next years Gaia will produce the most precise three-dimensional map of the Milky Way by surveying other than 1 billion of stars. For those stars Gaia will provide extremely precise measure- ment of proper motions, parallaxes and brightness. Aims. In this framework we plan to take advantage of the first Gaia data release, while preparing for the coming ones, to: i) move the first steps towards building a homogeneous data base of OCs with the high quality Gaia astrometry and photometry; ii) build, improve and test tools for the analysis of large sample of OCs; iii) use the OCs to explore the prop- erties of the disc in the solar neighborhood. Methods and Data. Using ESO archive data, we analyze the photometry and derive physical parameters, comparing data with synthetic populations and luminosity functions, of three clusters namely NGC 2225, NGC 6134 and NGC 2243.
    [Show full text]
  • A Basic Requirement for Studying the Heavens Is Determining Where In
    Abasic requirement for studying the heavens is determining where in the sky things are. To specify sky positions, astronomers have developed several coordinate systems. Each uses a coordinate grid projected on to the celestial sphere, in analogy to the geographic coordinate system used on the surface of the Earth. The coordinate systems differ only in their choice of the fundamental plane, which divides the sky into two equal hemispheres along a great circle (the fundamental plane of the geographic system is the Earth's equator) . Each coordinate system is named for its choice of fundamental plane. The equatorial coordinate system is probably the most widely used celestial coordinate system. It is also the one most closely related to the geographic coordinate system, because they use the same fun­ damental plane and the same poles. The projection of the Earth's equator onto the celestial sphere is called the celestial equator. Similarly, projecting the geographic poles on to the celest ial sphere defines the north and south celestial poles. However, there is an important difference between the equatorial and geographic coordinate systems: the geographic system is fixed to the Earth; it rotates as the Earth does . The equatorial system is fixed to the stars, so it appears to rotate across the sky with the stars, but of course it's really the Earth rotating under the fixed sky. The latitudinal (latitude-like) angle of the equatorial system is called declination (Dec for short) . It measures the angle of an object above or below the celestial equator. The longitud inal angle is called the right ascension (RA for short).
    [Show full text]
  • The Third Catalog of Active Galactic Nuclei Detected by the Fermi Large Area Telescope M
    The Astrophysical Journal, 810:14 (34pp), 2015 September 1 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/810/1/14 © 2015. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. THE THIRD CATALOG OF ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI DETECTED BY THE FERMI LARGE AREA TELESCOPE M. Ackermann1, M. Ajello2, W. B. Atwood3, L. Baldini4, J. Ballet5, G. Barbiellini6,7, D. Bastieri8,9, J. Becerra Gonzalez10,11, R. Bellazzini12, E. Bissaldi13, R. D. Blandford14, E. D. Bloom14, R. Bonino15,16, E. Bottacini14, T. J. Brandt10, J. Bregeon17, R. J. Britto18, P. Bruel19, R. Buehler1, S. Buson8,9, G. A. Caliandro14,20, R. A. Cameron14, M. Caragiulo13, P. A. Caraveo21, B. Carpenter10,22, J. M. Casandjian5, E. Cavazzuti23, C. Cecchi24,25, E. Charles14, A. Chekhtman26, C. C. Cheung27, J. Chiang14, G. Chiaro9, S. Ciprini23,24,28, R. Claus14, J. Cohen-Tanugi17, L. R. Cominsky29, J. Conrad30,31,32,70, S. Cutini23,24,28,R.D’Abrusco33,F.D’Ammando34,35, A. de Angelis36, R. Desiante6,37, S. W. Digel14, L. Di Venere38, P. S. Drell14, C. Favuzzi13,38, S. J. Fegan19, E. C. Ferrara10, J. Finke27, W. B. Focke14, A. Franckowiak14, L. Fuhrmann39, Y. Fukazawa40, A. K. Furniss14, P. Fusco13,38, F. Gargano13, D. Gasparrini23,24,28, N. Giglietto13,38, P. Giommi23, F. Giordano13,38, M. Giroletti34, T. Glanzman14, G. Godfrey14, I. A. Grenier5, J. E. Grove27, S. Guiriec10,2,71, J. W. Hewitt41,42, A. B. Hill14,43,68, D. Horan19, R. Itoh40, G. Jóhannesson44, A. S. Johnson14, W. N. Johnson27, J. Kataoka45,T.Kawano40, F. Krauss46, M. Kuss12, G. La Mura9,47, S. Larsson30,31,48, L.
    [Show full text]
  • The B3-VLA CSS Sample⋆
    A&A 528, A110 (2011) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015379 & c ESO 2011 Astrophysics The B3-VLA CSS sample VIII. New optical identifications from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey The ultraviolet-optical spectral energy distribution of the young radio sources C. Fanti1,R.Fanti1, A. Zanichelli1, D. Dallacasa1,2, and C. Stanghellini1 1 Istituto di Radioastronomia – INAF, via Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, Italy e-mail: [email protected] 2 Dipartimento di Astronomia, Università di Bologna, via Ranzani 1, 40127 Bologna, Italy Received 12 July 2010 / Accepted 22 December 2010 ABSTRACT Context. Compact steep-spectrum radio sources and giga-hertz peaked spectrum radio sources (CSS/GPS) are generally considered to be mostly young radio sources. In recent years we studied at many wavelengths a sample of these objects selected from the B3-VLA catalog: the B3-VLA CSS sample. Only ≈60% of the sources were optically identified. Aims. We aim to increase the number of optical identifications and study the properties of the host galaxies of young radio sources. Methods. We cross-correlated the CSS B3-VLA sample with the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), DR7, and complemented the SDSS photometry with available GALEX (DR 4/5 and 6) and near-IR data from UKIRT and 2MASS. Results. We obtained new identifications and photometric redshifts for eight faint galaxies and for one quasar and two quasar candi- dates. Overall we have 27 galaxies with SDSS photometry in five bands, for which we derived the ultraviolet-optical spectral energy distribution (UV-O-SED). We extended our investigation to additional CSS/GPS selected from the literature.
    [Show full text]