DOCSLIB.ORG

Redd+ Project for Caribbean Guatemala: the Conservation Coast Monitoring & Implementation Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Redd+ Project for Caribbean Guatemala: the Conservation Coast Monitoring & Implementation Report MONITORING & IMPLEMENTATION REPORT VCS Version 3.6, CCB Standards Second Edition REDD+ PROJECT FOR CARIBBEAN GUATEMALA: THE CONSERVATION COAST MONITORING & IMPLEMENTATION REPORT Karen Aguilar, Development Director [email protected] Document Prepared By Paz Lozano, Manager of Development Services [email protected] Kyle Holland, Managing Director [email protected] v3.0 1 MONITORING & IMPLEMENTATION REPORT VCS Version 3.6, CCB Standards Second Edition Project Title REDD+ Project for Caribbean Guatemala: The Conservation Coast Version 2.3 Report ID Date of Issue 9 January 2017 Project ID Monitoring Period 1 April 2012 – 31 March 2014 Prepared By Ecological Carbon Offsets Partners, LLC (ecoPartners) and Fundacion para el Ecodesarrollo y la Conservacion (FUNDAECO) Contact ecoPartners Phone: +1 (415) 634-4650 Address: 2930 Shattuck Ave, Suite 305, Berkeley, CA 94705 Email: [email protected] Website: www.epcarbon.com v3.0 2 MONITORING & IMPLEMENTATION REPORT VCS Version 3.6, CCB Standards Second Edition i.Project Name REDD+ Project for Caribbean Guatemala: The Conservation Coast ii.Project Location Izabal Department de Izabal, Guatemala iii.Project Proponent Fundación para el Ecodesarrollo y la Conservación (FUNDAECO) Phone: (502) 23141900 Address: 25 calle 2-39 zona 1, Guatemala City, Guatemala Email: [email protected] Website: www.fundaeco.org.gt iv. Auditor AENOR – Asociación Española de Normalización y Certificación Contacto: Luis Robles Dirección: Genova 6, 28004 Madrid, España Telefono: + 34 914 326 000 / +34 913 190 581 Email: [email protected] v. Project start date, GHG Project start date: April 1 2012, GHG accounting period: April 1 2012 - March 31 2042 accounting period and Project lifetime: 30 years lifetime vi. Project implementation 1 April 2012 – 31 March 2014 period covered by thePIR vi. History of CCB status Validation in process viii. Edition of CCB CCB Standards Third Edition standards used for this verification ix. Summary of the Estimated GHG reductions: 935,214 (tCO2e). climate, community and 202 community and local entrepreneurs (agroforestry, handicrafts, and ecotourism) were supported for more sustainable livelihoods biodiversity benefits and improve their family incomes, through supplies provision, generated by the project technical assistance and trainings. since the start date and 15832 persons from 103 communities were benefitted with sexual during the period covered and reproductive health services by the PIR 5013 students from schools and universities participated in environmental education activities. 14101 ha of important watersources for local communities and towns were protected 733.38ha of highly threatened ecosystems were acquired to created nature reserves x. Gold Level Criteria None xi. Date of complettion of 9 January 2017 this versión of the PIR xii. Version 2.3 v3.0 3 MONITORING & IMPLEMENTATION REPORT VCS Version 3.6, CCB Standards Second Edition Table of Contents 1 General ..................................................................................................................................................................... 10 1.1 Summary Description of the Project (G1) ......................................................................................... 10 1.1.1 Project Objectives ...................................................................................................................... 10 1.2 Project Location (G1 & G3) ............................................................................................................... 12 1.2.1 Soil .............................................................................................................................................. 12 1.2.2 Geology ...................................................................................................................................... 14 1.2.3 Climate ....................................................................................................................................... 15 1.3 Project Proponent (G1, G4) ............................................................................................................... 17 1.4 Other Entities Involved in the Project (G4) ....................................................................................... 18 1.4.1 Technical Skills and Capacity ...................................................................................................... 19 1.4.2 Regulators .................................................................................................................................. 19 1.4.3 GHG Program Administrators .................................................................................................... 19 1.5 Project Start Date .............................................................................................................................. 20 1.5.1 Program Start Date .................................................................................................................... 20 1.5.2 Project Activity Instance Start Dates .......................................................................................... 20 1.6 Project Crediting Period .................................................................................................................... 22 2 Implementation of Design ........................................................................................................................................ 22 2.1 Sectoral Scope and Project Type ....................................................................................................... 22 2.1.1 Grouped Project ......................................................................................................................... 22 2.1.2 Project Area................................................................................................................................ 23 2.2 Description of the Project Activity (G2) ............................................................................................ 24 2.2.1 Activities Leading to Net GHG Emissions Reductions ................................................................ 24 2.2.2 Activities Leading to Community and Biodiversity Benefits ...................................................... 25 2.3 Management of Risks to Project Benefits (G1) ................................................................................. 26 2.3.1 Climate Risks .............................................................................................................................. 27 2.3.2 Community Risks ........................................................................................................................ 27 2.3.3 Biodiversity Risks ........................................................................................................................ 28 2.4 Measures to Maintain High Conservation Values (B1, B2, CM1, CM2) ............................................ 29 2.4.1 Community High Conservation Values (CM1, CM2) .................................................................. 29 2.4.2 Biodiversity High Conservation Values (B1, B2) ......................................................................... 30 2.5 Project Financing (G3 & G4) .............................................................................................................. 32 v3.0 4 MONITORING & IMPLEMENTATION REPORT VCS Version 3.6, CCB Standards Second Edition 2.4.2 Employment Training ................................................................................................................. 32 2.5 Equal Opportunities for Employment (G4) ....................................................................................... 34 2.5.1 Worker’s Rights .......................................................................................................................... 35 2.5.2 Worker Safety ............................................................................................................................ 36 2.6 Stakeholders (G3) .............................................................................................................................. 37 2.6.1 Stakeholder Engagement Structure ........................................................................................... 37 2.6.2 Public Comment Period ............................................................................................................. 38 2.6.3 Stakeholder Conflict and Grievances ......................................................................................... 38 3 Legal Status ............................................................................................................................................................... 39 3.1 Compliance with Laws, Statues, Property Rights and Other Regulatory Frameworks (G3 & G5) .... 39 3.2 Evidence of Project Ownership (G5) ................................................................................................. 41 3.3 Emissions Trading Programs and Other Binding Limits (G5) ............................................................ 42 3.4 Participation under Other GHG Programs (G5) ................................................................................ 42 3.5 Other Forms of Environmental Credit (G5) ....................................................................................... 42 3.6 Projects Rejected by Other GHG Programs (G5) ..............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Curriculum Vitae
    KARLA SAMANTA ORELLANA ARÉVALO ASU Biocollections, AB144 F1, 734 W. Alameda Drive, Tempe AZ 85282 [email protected] RESEARCH INTERESTS • Taxonomy, systematics, ecology and biogeography of fungus weevils (Coleoptera: Anthribidae). • Entomological collection management and digitization. EDUCATION • PhD. Student, Evolutionary Biology Program, School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University. Tempe, Arizona, United States of America, August 2019-present. • M.Sc. in Entomology, Central American Program of M.Sc. in Entomology, Faculty of Exact Sciences and Technology, University of Panama. Panama City, Panama, 2018. • Postgraduate Diploma in Entomology, Central American Program of M.Sc. in Entomology, Vice- Rectorate of Research and Postgraduate Studies, University of Panama. Panama City, Panama. Panama City, Panama, 2017. • B.Sc. in Biology, School of Biology, Faculty of Chemical Sciences and Pharmacy, University of San Carlos of Guatemala. Guatemala City, Guatemala, 2014. RESEARCH AND TEACHING EXPERIENCE 2021- Teaching Assistant. General Biology BIO 181 Lab, School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University. Tempe, Arizona, USA. 2019-2021 Research Assistant. Weevils of Sonora Project, Franz Lab, Insect Systematics and Evolution, School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University. Tempe, Arizona, USA. 2015 Interim Assistant Professor. BIGU Herbarium Research Unit, School of Biology, Faculty of Chemical Sciences and Pharmacy, University of San Carlos of Guatemala, Guatemala. 2011-2013 Undergraduate Teaching Assistant. Department of Zoology, Genetics and Wildlife, School of Biology, Faculty of Chemical Sciences and Pharmacy, University of San Carlos of Guatemala, Guatemala. Zoology, Evolution and Geology courses. 2009 Student Participant and Field Crew Member. Leaf Litter Arthropods of Mesoamerica - LLAMA-: Guatemala Expedition. The Evergreen State College and The Canadian Museum of Nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Maize Genetic Resources of Highland Guatemala in Space and Time
    Seeds, hands, and lands Maize genetic resources of highland Guatemala in space and time Promotoren Prof. dr. P. Richards Hoogleraar Technologie en Agrarische Ontwikkeling Wageningen Universiteit Prof. dr. ir. A.K. Bregt Hoogleraar Geo-informatiekunde Wageningen Universiteit Co-promotoren Dr. ir. S. de Bruin Universitair docent, Centrum voor Geo-Informatie Wageningen Universiteit Dr. ir. H. Maat Universitair docent, leerstoelgroep Technologie en Agrarische Ontwikkeling Wageningen Universiteit Promotiecommissie Dr. E.F. Fischer (Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA) Dr. ir. Th.J.L. van Hintum (Centrum voor Genetische Bronnen Nederland, Wageningen) Prof. dr. L.E. Visser (Wageningen Universiteit) Prof. dr. K.S. Zimmerer (University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA) Dit onderzoek is uitgevoerd binnen CERES Research School for Resource Studies for Development en C.T. de Wit Graduate School for Production Ecology and Resource Conservation. Seeds, hands, and lands Maize genetic resources of highland Guatemala in space and time Jacob van Etten Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor op gezag van de rector magnificus van Wageningen Universiteit, prof. dr. M.J. Kropff, in het openbaar te verdedigen op woensdag 11 oktober 2006 des namiddags te vier uur in de Aula © Jacob van Etten, except Chapter 2 Keywords: plant genetic resources, Guatemala, maize ISBN: 90-8504-485-5 Cover design: Marisa Rappard For Laura and Hanna Acknowledgments This work was financially supported by Wageningen University and Research Centre through the CERES Research School for Resource Studies for Human Development and through the C.T. de Wit Graduate School for Production Ecology and Resource Conservation. I am grateful for having such good supervisors, who advised me on crucial points but also allowed me much freedom.
    [Show full text]
  • Filling Distribution Gaps of a Little-Known Endemic Species, Rojasianthe Superba Standl
    14 1 267 NOTES ON GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION Check List 14 (1): 267–275 https://doi.org/10.15560/14.1.267 Filling distribution gaps of a little-known endemic species, Rojasianthe superba Standl. & Steyerm. (Asteraceae) in northern Central America Bárbara I. Escobar-Anleu,1, 2 Juan M. Quiñónez-Guzmán,1, 2 José M. Mora3 1 Instituto Internacional en Conservación y Manejo de Vida Silvestre (ICOMVIS), Universidad Nacional (UNA), Heredia, Costa Rica. 2 Escuela de Biología, Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala, Edificio T-10, Ciudad Universitaria, Zona 12, Ciudad de Guatemala, Guatemala. 3 Carrera de Gestión Ecoturística, Sede Central, Universidad Técnica Nacional, Alajuela, Costa Rica. Corresponding author: Bárbara I. Escobar-Anleu, [email protected] Abstract Rojasianthe superba Standl. & Steyerm. (Asteraceae) is an endemic species, limited to a few localities in Mexico and Guatemala. Here we report a new occurrence point at a departmental scale in Guatemala; it also extends its known distribution by 40 km to the northeast. We ran species distribution models (SDM) to evaluate the potential spatial distribution of the species. Rojasianthe superba has a higher probability of occurrence in the country highlands and also a high probability of extending its range in the volcanic chain, where it has been found in some isolated sites. Elevation was the most important variable explaining this potential distribution. These high altitude montane forests where R. superba occurs have been identified as endemism sites for different taxa in Guatemala. Key words Chimaltenango; Guatemala; montane forests, Neotropics; new record; Volcanic Chain. Academic editor: Rosa del Carmen Ortiz-Gentry | Received 16 August 2017 | Accepted 2 January 2018 | Published 23 February 2018 Citation: Escobar-Anleu BI, Quiñónez-Guzmán JM, Mora JM (2018) Filling distribution gaps of a little-known endemic species, Rojasianthe superba Standl.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Biodiversity in Latin America and the Caribbean a Mid-Term Review of Progress Towards the Aichi Biodiversity Targets
    THE STATE OF BIODIVERSITY IN LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN A MID-TERM REVIEW OF PROGRESS TOWARDS THE AICHI BIODIVERSITY TARGETS 4 2 © CIFOR Preparation Reproduction This study was commissioned by the Division of Environmental This publication may be reproduced for educational or Law and Conventions (DELC) of the United Nations non-profit purposes without special permission, provided Environmental Programme (UNEP) under the leadership acknowledgement to the source is made. Reuse of any figures of Ms. Elizabeth Maruma Mrema, DELC Director, and the is subject to permission from the original rights holders. No direct supervision of Mr. Alberto Pacheco Capella, Regional use of this publication may be made for resale or any other Coordinator, Ecosystem Management Subprogramme for commercial purpose without permission in writing from UNEP. Latin America and the Caribbean. Additional funding has Applications for permission, with a statement of purpose and been provided by the UNEP World Conservation Monitoring extent of reproduction, should be sent to the UNEP-DELC Centre (UNEP-WCMC) and the Secretariat of the Convention Director, United Nations Environment Programme, P.O. Box on Biological Diversity (SCBD). The design, printing and 30552, Nairobi 00100, Kenya. distribution of this report was enabled through the financial contribution of the European Union. Disclaimer The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the views Citation or policies of UNEP, contributory organizations or editors. The UNEP-WCMC (2016) The State of Biodiversity in Latin America designations employed and the presentations of material in this and the Caribbean: A mid-term review of progress towards the report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever Aichi Biodiversity Targets.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Brief
    POLICY BRIEF NO. 18 · APRIL 2016 Guatemala’s Environmental Challenges: Vulnerabilities and Policy Solutions HIGHLIGHTS The topic of the environment has special urgency for Guatemala given significant land degradation and its tight links to poverty and inequality, vulnerability to disasters, and tensions involving mining enterprises and land rights. Guatemalan religious actors engage in global and national debates about climate change and, at community and national levels, advocate for action and mobilize community responses. As a historically Catholic country, Guatemalan religious leaders take special inspiration from Pope Francis’s call in his May 2015 Encyclical, Laudato Si’, for people of all faiths to engage in dialogue to protect what he terms ‘Our Common Home’. ENVIRONMENTAL VULNERABILITIES AND 2013), 35 percent of land area, and 11.5 percent of GDP.5 Cattle CHALLENGES ranching in Petén and large-scale agriculture, including African Many Guatemalan eco-systems and species are threatened; palm, are key drivers of deforestation. The fast-growing African this is especially significant as the country ranks first in palm industry attracts special attention, with pesticides and other Central America for the number of eco-regions and endemic chemical runoff reaching rivers and lakes, threatening fish stocks 6,7 species. Over 9,000 plant and animal species in 66 ecosystems are and contaminating drinking water. In the northern Petén area, counted, with more than 13 percent of those species considered pollution from a local African palm plantation killed tens of endemic to Guatemala.1 Map of Government-Issued Mining Licenses in Guatemala Water is a threatened resource in Guatemala and observers as of March 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Tourism in Protected Areas As a Driver for Environmental Conservation and Community Development in Guatemala
    SUSTAINABLE TOURISM IN PROTECTED AREAS AS A DRIVER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT IN GUATEMALA By Cesar Rene Gonzalez Honours Bachelor of Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, 2012 A thesis presented to Ryerson University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Applied Science in the Program of Environmental Applied Science and Management Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2014 © Cesar R. Gonzalez 2014 AUTHOR'S DECLARATION FOR ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF A THESIS I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I authorize Ryerson University to lend this thesis to other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I further authorize Ryerson University to reproduce this thesis by photocopying or by other means, in total or in part, at the request of other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Sustainable Tourism in Protected Areas as a Driver for Environmental Conservation and Community Development in Guatemala Master of Applied Science, 2014 Cesar R. Gonzalez Environmental Applied Science and Management Ryerson University Abstract Developing sustainable tourism in protected areas is of interest because of their marketable settings for outdoor activities in natural environments and for their role in protecting cultural and natural assets. Managing and planning these areas for tourism poses challenges because of issues pertaining to income generation, community development, and visitor management. The region of Lake Izabal-Rio Dulce in Guatemala contains three protected areas – Cerro San Gil, Rio Dulce National Park, and Chocon Machacas – that are significant in protecting biodiversity but are not effectively managed for tourism.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring & Implementation Report Lacandón – Forest
    MONITORING & IMPLEMENTATION REPORT VCS Version 3, CCB Standards Third Edition MONITORING & IMPLEMENTATION REPORT LACANDÓN – FOREST FOR LIFE REDD+ PROJECT Project Title Lacandón – Forest for Life REDD+ Project Version 02 Report ID Date of Issue 27 September 2016 Project ID PL1541 Monitoring Period 01-February-2012 to 24-August-2014 Prepared By South Pole Carbon S.A.S Fundación Defensores de la Naturaleza OroVerde - Die Tropenwaldstiftung, Tropical Forest Foundation Contact South Pole Carbon S.A.S. Calle 10A # 34-11, Oficina 4005, Medellín, Colombia Phone: +57 4 352 4428 Email: [email protected] v3.0 1 MONITORING & IMPLEMENTATION REPORT VCS Version 3, CCB Standards Third Edition COVER PAGE i. Project name Lacandón - Forest for Life REDD+ Project ii. Project location La Libertad and Las Cruces Municipalities, North West of Petén Department, Guatemala Primary Project Proponent Fundación Defensores de la Naturaleza 4a. Avenida 23-01 Zona 14 Phone (+502) 2310-2929 / 5323-2765 Javier Márquez Email: [email protected] Unión Maya Itzá Cooperative REDD+ representative: Juan Carlos Pérez iii. Project Proponent Phone: (+502) 4185-7328 La Lucha Cooperative REDD+ representative: Angel Velarde Phone: (+502) 4908-6978 La Técnica Agropecuaria Cooperative REDD+ representative: Haroldo Ramírez Phone: (+502) 5336-0807 AENOR Jose Luis Fuentes Perez iv. Auditor [email protected] Phone: +34 914326000 Project start date: February 1st 2012 v. Project lifetime Project lifetime: 30 years GHG accounting period: February 1st 2012 - January 31st 2042 vi. Project implementation February 1st 2012 – August 24th, 2014 period covered by the PIR Full Validation Date: 18 June 2016 CCB Standard Third Edition & VCS Standard Version 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating 20 Years of Wildlife Conservation
    WILDLIFE RESCUE AND CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION 20th Anniversary/2009 Annual Report CELEBRATING 20 YEARS OF WILDLIFE CONSERVATION 20 year Anniversary and 2009 Annual Report On this 20th anniversary of ARCAS’s founding, we are pausing to celebrate its accom- plishments in rescuing and conserving Guatemalan wildlife and contributing to the sus- tainable development of rural communities. This annual report includes three sections: - A summary of our accomplishments/outputs during the last 20 years, - A description of ARCAS’s development as an organization, and its principal mile stones, and, - The 2009 Annual Report PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW ADDRESS, PHONE NUMBERS AND E-MAIL ADDRESSES ON THE BACK COVER! 1 WILDLIFE RESCUE AND CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION 20th Anniversary/2009 Annual Report 20 YEAR OUTPUTS We here at ARCAS have spent the last few months pouring over dusty data, photographs and annual reports, and have compiled a list of yearly outputs of the association. The following is a summary of some of the principal ones. Please note that this is just a summary; contact us if you’d like the full data. ARCAS PRODUCTS, 1989 - 2009 ACTIVIDAD/Activity TOTAL ANIMALS RESCUED (Peten, Guatemala City & Hawaii) 6,932 SCARLET MACAWS RAISED IN CAPTIVITY/Guacamayas reproducidas en cautiverio 30 SEA TURTLE EGGS COLLECTED (Hawaii and El Rosario Hatcheries) 352,290 VOLUNTEERS AND INTERNS RECEIVED (Peten, Hawaii & Guatemala City) 5,068 PARTICIPANTS IN ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION ACTIVITIES (Peten, Guatemala City & Hawaii) 83,660 VISITORS TO THE ARCAS LIBRARY IN SAN BENITO 24,203 JUSTA STOVES CONSTRUCTED 508 From 1989 to 2009, 6,465 wild animals were rescued by ARCAS at its three project sites in Guatemala City, Hawaii and Peten.
    [Show full text]
  • Azu Etd Mr 2011 0163 Sip1 M.Pdf
    Agricultural Autonomy: The Rural Poor as a Force for Sustainable Development in Guatemala's Western Highlands Item Type Electronic Thesis; text Authors Percival, Abigail Vera Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 23/09/2021 15:07:39 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/144920 Abigail Percival · 1 · ABSTRACT: In Guatemala’s Western Highlands, conservation and development are inextricable goals because poor people generally depend on nature for their entire livelihood. Ironically, the cultivation practices of the country’s poorest farmers pose one of the greatest threats to the environment even though these campesinos are among the most vulnerable to its degradation. This study seeks to analyze the historical roots of this paradigm and show how barriers to agricultural autonomy, imposed in various ways since the Spanish conquest in 1524, have created oppression, inequality, and ecologically unsustainable techniques. I will argue that sustainable rural development demands that these barriers be reduced or eliminated and describe the individual roles of the state, NGOs, and farmers in this essential process. Abigail Percival · 2 · AGRICULTURAL AUTONOMY: THE RURAL POOR AS A FORCE FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN GUATEMALA’S WESTERN HIGHLANDS PREFACE: AUTONOMY UNDER FIRE “Oh would that this Eden might be reclaimed, the swords beaten into plough-shares, and the generals and other officers turn their wasted energies to agriculture…!” – William T.
    [Show full text]
  • Guatemala Biodiversity and Tropical Forest Assessment
    GUATEMALA BIODIVERSITY AND TROPICAL FOREST ASSESSMENT May 2010 This report was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). It was prepared by International Resources Group (IRG) in collaboration with Abt Associates. GUATEMALA BIODIVERSITY AND TROPICAL FOREST ASSESSMENT Consultants: James Tolisano, Biodiversity Specialist/Team Leader María Mercedes López – Selva, Conservation Biologist May 2010 DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE ······················································································································IX EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ································································································ 1 PURPOSE OF THE ASSESSMENT................................................................................1 BIODIVERSITY AND TROPICAL FORESTS IN GUATEMALA .......................................1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION EFFORTS IN GUATEMALA .....................................1 THREATS TO THE CONSERVATION AND SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF BIODIVERSITY AND TROPICAL FORESTS IN GUATEMALA............................3 OPPORTUNITIES TO REDUCE OR MITIGATE THREATS............................................4 1. USAID’S ROLE IN PROTECTING BIODIVERSITY AND TROPICAL FORESTS IN GUATEMALA ················································································ 5 1.1 PURPOSE
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving Guatemala's Ecosystems
    PROJECT BRIEF Thinking and Working Politically Series: Conserving Guatemala’s Ecosystems April 2021 About This Brief This is part of a series of case studies highlighting Chemonics’ experiences and lessons learned with thinking and working politically (TWP) and applied political economy analysis (APEA). This work is supported by Chemonics’ Center for Politically Informed Programming, which serves as a resource hub to build awareness and best practice of TWP and related approaches. Drawing on the Chemonics-implemented USAID/Guatemala Biodiversity Project, this brief highlights the process, findings, and tools of the baseline APEA (as well as the second APEA iteration), and how it PROJECT OVERVIEW oriented the project team to TWP. The USAID/Guatemala Biodiversity Project works in three protected areas — Maya Biosphere Reserve, Introduction Sierra de las Minas Biosphere Reserve, and the The USAID/Guatemala Biodiversity Project (GBP) aims to Pacific Coast ― focused on build national capacity to improve management and four objectives: governance throughout Guatemala’s System of Protected 1. Improve conservation Areas. It employs a strategy that strengthens conservation approaches through approaches through better information on key species and better information on ecosystems, supports national and sub-national policy and key species and legislative reforms, builds capacity for effective enforcement ecosystems 2. Support national and and prosecution, and engages local stakeholders in sub-national policy and conservation and sustainable use initiatives. The project legislative reforms operates within unstable and highly complex contexts, 3. Build capacity for marked by endemic structural and institutional challenges in effective enforcement and prosecution of addition to emergent developments that test institutional crimes committed response capacities.
    [Show full text]
  • Guatemala DIVERSIDAD BIOLÓGICA Consejo Nacional De Áreas Protegidas Documento Técnico No
    2 V INFORME NACIONAL DE CUMPLIMIENTO A LOS ACUERDOS DEL CONVENIO SOBRE LA Gobierno de Guatemala DIVERSIDAD BIOLÓGICA Consejo Nacional de Áreas Protegidas Documento Técnico No. 3-2014 DOCUMENTO ELABORADO POR EL CONSEJO NACIONAL DE ÁREAS PROTEGIDAS Revisión y Edición de texto: José Luis Echeverría Tello/ Director Oficina Técnica de Biodiversidad Juan M. Quiñónez Guzmán Mónica Barillas Rodas Jorge Jiménez Barrios Ana Silvia Morales Andrea Nájera / Proyecto NBSAP, PNUD Diseño de portada y contraportada Hiliana Núñez Fotografías de portada © Jorge Jiménez © Juan Quiñónez © Mónica Barillas Se sugiere citar el documento de la siguiente manera: CONAP. 2014. V INFORME NACIONAL DE CUMPLIMIENTO A LOS ACUERDOS DEL CONVENIO SOBRE LA DIVERSIDAD BIOLÓGICA. Guatemala. Documento Técnico No. 3 - 2014. Consejo Nacional de Áreas Protegidas -CONAP- 5a. Avenida, 6-06 Zona 1, Edificio IPM, 5to., 6to., y 7mo. Niveles, Guatemala, C.A. PBX: +(502) 2422-6700 FAX: +(502) 2253-4141 V Informe Nacional de Cumplimiento a los Acuerdos del Convenio sobre la Diversidad Biológica conap.gob.gt chmguatemala.gob.gt (portal especializado en diversidad biológica) bchguatemala.gob.gt (portal especializado en seguridad de la biotecnología) Esta publicación se realiza de acuerdo al Normativo de Propiedad Intelectual del CONAP, aprobado por el Consejo Nacional de Áreas Protegidas con fecha 28 de agosto de 2013. Diseño e impresión: 3a. avenida 14-62, zona 1 PBX: (502) 2245-8888 www.serviprensa.com Portada: Maite Sánchez Diagramación: Elizabeth González Revisión textos: Jaime Bran Este
    [Show full text]