Final Environmental Impact Statement

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Final Environmental Impact Statement Final Environmental Impact Statement Tiskilwa 180 180North Project Limit Hennepin Goose 4 Lake Lake Thunderbird Illinois26 29 (FAP 318) Putnam 29 Senachwine Lake from IL6 to I-180 BUREAU COUNTY PUTNAM COUNTY MARSHALL COUNTY CSX RR CSX Sawmill Peoria, Marshall, Putnam Lake 18 Henry Western Rd. and Bureau Counties, Billsbach Lake NORTH SECTION IAIS RR Yankee Ln. Yankee Illinois Camp Grove Rd. CENTRAL SECTION 17 Lacon Sparland 17 S7 Hopewell MARSHALL COUNTY Illinois Lake PEORIA COUNTY Meadow R60 Lake UP RR UP CENTRAL SECTION BNSF RR North Hampton D19 SOUTH SECTION Chillicothe Truitt Rd. D22 Hallock Rd. Douglas Lake N 40 Rome West Rd. Old Galena Rd. SCALE 29 Upper 0 1 2 2.5 3 4 Miles Peoria 26 Lake MILES Cedar Hills Dr. April 2009 Mossville 6 South Project Limit TB052006007MKE Location Map IL 29 Corridor Study IL 6 to I-180 Peoria, Marshall, Putnam, Bureau Counties Tiskilwa 180 North Project Limit 180 Hennepin Goose 4 Lake Lake Thunderbird 26 Putnam 29 Senachwine Lake UREAU COUNTY B PUTNAM COUNTY MARSHALL COUNTY RR CSX Sawmill Lake 18 Henry Western Rd. Billsbach NORTH SECTION Lake IAIS RR Yankee Ln. Yankee Camp Grove Rd. CENTRAL SECTION 17 Lacon Sparland 17 S7 Hopewell MARSHALL COUNTY Illinois Lake PEORIA COUNTY Meadow R60 Lake RR UP CENTRAL SECTION BNSF RR North Hampton D19 SOUTH SECTION Chillicothe Truitt Rd. D22 Hallock Rd. Douglas Lake 40 Rome West Rd. Old Galena Rd. N 29 Upper Peoria 26 Lake Cedar Hills Dr. SCALE 0 1 2 2.5 3 4 Miles MILES Mossville 6 South Project Limit T112004002MKE Location Map 5-13-05tll Executive Summary Introduction This Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Illinois Route 29 (IL 29) corridor from IL 6 near Mossville in Peoria County to Interstate 180 (I-180) north of Kentville Road in Bureau County, Illinois has been prepared to identify the potential environmental affects associated with the proposed action in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the 1978 Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations, and the Federal Highway Administration and Illinois Department of Transportation guidelines. The Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS for the project appeared in the Federal Register on July 24, 2002. A Draft EIS for the IL 29 corridor was approved by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) on May 6, 2006, for distribution to state and federal review agencies and public availability. The Draft EIS discussed social/economic and environmental resource impacts for a range of alternative improvements. The IDOT held a public hearing on June 14 and 15, 2006. The alternatives under consideration included both the Build and No-Build Alternatives. The Build Alternative is shown on the Location Map and is generally described along with the No-Build Alternative as follows: • The Build Alternative begins at the IL 6 interchange and extends north to I-180 north of the Kentville Road intersection. Along the approximately 10-mile stretch from IL 6 to a point north of Chillicothe where the alignment rejoins existing IL 29, the type of highway design being considered for construction is a freeway on new alignment. From the proposed North Chillicothe interchange to the north project terminus, the type of highway design being considered for construction is a 4-lane divided expressway, generally following existing IL 29 except in Henry, where the proposed design is on new alignment west of the community. Within the freeway section, access would only be allowed at grade-separated interchanges. With the expressway typical section at-grade intersections would be permitted at crossroads and access would be permitted from residential and agricultural properties. • No-Build Alternative is defined as no new major construction. The No-Build Alternative would be limited to short-term restoration activities (maintenance improvements) needed to ensure the continued use of IL 29 between IL 6 and I-180. No capacity improvements would be made. The design of the existing roadway, including location, geometric features, and current capacity limitations, would remain unchanged. Generally, there would be no need for any additional right-of-way for the No-Build Alternative. The No-Build Alternative would not address existing deficiencies along IL 29 and therefore would not meet the project’s purpose and need. III IL 29 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Information About This Final EIS This Final EIS includes information presented in the Draft EIS. It also responds to comments on the Draft EIS, summarizes input received as a result of the public hearing and availability of the Draft EIS for review, and identifies the IDOT’s and FHWA’s Preferred Alternative and the basis for its selection. Following is an overview of the changes between the Draft and Final EIS, and revisions or additions based on Draft EIS comments or public hearing input. • Summary—Updated the section to include the identification of the Preferred Alternative and updated the impact summary table to reflect design changes since distribution of the Draft EIS. • Section 1—Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action. Minor changes in response to agency comments. • Section 2—Alternatives/Preferred Alternative. Identified the Preferred Alternative and described design changes since distribution of the Draft EIS. • Section 3—Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Measures to Minimize Harm. Updated the environmental consequences and measures to minimize harm as appropriate to reflect design changes since distribution of the Draft EIS and identification of the Preferred Alternative. • Section 4—List of Agencies, Organizations and Persons Receiving a Copy of this Statement. New Final EIS section. • Section 5—Agency Coordination and Public Involvement. Updated the section to include a description of the Public Hearing and input received during the comment period, as well as information related to agency coordination and agency input on the Draft EIS. • Section 6—References. No changes. • Section 7—List of Preparers. Updated to reflect preparers of the EIS. Location The proposed IL 29 improvement extends about 35 miles from the IL 6 interchange near Mossville north to I-180 in Bureau County (see Figure 1-1). The project study area involves four counties—Peoria, Marshall, Putnam and Bureau—and encompasses a number of communities. The four principal communities in the study area are Chillicothe, Sparland, Henry and Putnam. Other communities in the study area include Mossville, Rome, Hopewell, and Lacon. Proposed Action The proposed action will provide a modern high-type highway between IL 6 near Mossville in Peoria County and I-180 in Bureau County, Illinois. The proposed highway facility will IV EXECUTIVE SUMMARY provide improved transportation continuity, facilitate modal interrelationships, improve travel efficiency, and enhance economic stability within the IL 29 corridor between IL 6 to I- 180. The proposed facility would provide a safe and efficient highway to serve existing and future travel demand for both regional and local travelers while minimizing disturbance to the natural and built environment. Preferred Alternative The IDOT and FHWA selected the Build Alternative as the Preferred Alternative after evaluating the public and agency comments received at the June 2006 public hearing and during the public comment period. Table 1 summarizes the impacts of the Preferred Alternative. The IDOT received more than 175 written and oral comments from citizens, businesses and local governments during the Draft EIS comment period. Nine agencies also provided comments: • Illinois Department of Agriculture—Division of Natural Resources, Bureau of Land and Water Resources • Illinois Department of Natural Resources—Division of Environment and Ecosystems • Illinois Environmental Protection Agency • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers—Rock Island District • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers—Planning, Programs and Project Management Division • U.S. Department of Commerce—National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration • U.S. Public Health Service, Department of Health and Human Services—Center for Environmental Health • U.S. Department of Interior—Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Throughout the study process, regular opportunities were provided for project area residents and local government officials to learn about and provide input to the IL 29 project. Two sets of public information meetings were held (June 11 and 12, 2003, and July 14 and 15, 2004): one in Chillicothe and one in Henry. Small group meetings were held with residents and officials of local communities, the Senachwine Township, Henry Fire Protection District, Peoria Park District, area railroad companies, and area watershed committee representatives. Three newsletters were produced and distributed throughout the study area. The third newsletter, which was sent out just before the Public Hearings, was sent to more than 1,100 names on the mailing list. Return-mail comment forms were included in each newsletter and were available at public meetings. Approximately 600 written comments have been received and considered throughout the course of the study. A fourth newsletter will be sent out summarizing the conclusions of the NEPA process. V IL 29 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT TABLE 1 Impact Summary Resource (Unit of Measurement) No-Build Alternative Preferred Alternative New Right of Way Needed to Construct the Roadway 0 acres 1,038 acres Landlocked/Environmental Mitigation
Recommended publications
  • River Mileages and Drainage Areas for Illinois Streams—Volume 2, Illinois River Basin
    RIVER MILEAGES AND DRAINAGE AREAS FOR ILLINOIS STREAMS—VOLUME 2, ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 79-111 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS RIVER MILEAGES AND DRAINAGE AREAS FOR ILLINOIS STREAMS—VOLUME 2, ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN By R. W. Healy U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 79-111 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 1979 CONTENTS Conversion Table . .iv Abstract . .1 Introduction . .1 Methods . .2 Explanation of tables . .2 References . .3 Index . .291 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1. Map showing Illinois counties . .4 2. Map showing stream systems, hydrologic units, and major cities in Illinois. .6 TABLE Table 1. River mileages and drainage areas for Illinois streams . .8 i CONVERSION TABLE Multiply inch-pound unit By To obtain SI (metric) unit mile (mi) 1.609 kilometer (km) square mile (mi2) 2.590 square kilometer (km2) iv RIVER MILEAGES AND DRAINAGE FOR ILLINOIS STREAMS— Volume 2, Illinois River Basin By R. W. Healy ABSTRACT River mileages are presented for points of interest on Illinois streams draining 10 square miles or more. Points of interest include bridges, dams, gaging stations, county lines, hydrologic unit boundaries, and major tributaries. Drainage areas are presented for selected sites, including total drainage area for any streams draining at least 100 square miles. INTRODUCTION Expansion of water-resource investigations within the State of Illinois has amplified the need for a common index to locations on streams. A common index would aid in the coordination of various stream-related activities by facilitating data collection and interpretation.
    [Show full text]
  • Muncy Creek Township
    Muncy Creek Planning Area Plan Adoptions 2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY Plan Adoptions HUGHESVILLE BOROUGH COUNCIL – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> MUNCY BOROUGH COUNCIL – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> PICTURE ROCKS BOROUGH COUNCIL – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> MUNCY CREEK TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> SHREWSBURY TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> WOLF TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> Lycoming 2030: Plan the Possible 2 Muncy Creek Planning Area Acknowledgements 2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY Acknowledgements Muncy Creek Planning Advisory Team (PAT) WALTER REED, REPRESENTATIVE OF HUGHESVILLE BOROUGH RICHARD SMITH, REPRESENTATIVE OF HUGHESVILLE BOROUGH STEVE JAQUITH, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY BOROUGH (ALTERNATE) BILL RAMSEY, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY BOROUGH LINDA STEIN, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY BOROUGH STEVEN CULVER, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY CREEK TOWNSHIP BILL POULTON, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY CREEK TOWNSHIP ANGELA SNYDER, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY CREEK TOWNSHIP BILL DORMAN, REPRESENTATIVE OF PICTURE ROCKS BOROUGH EUGENE OTTERBEIN, REPRESENTATIVE OF PICTURE ROCKS BOROUGH DEAN BARTO, REPRESENTATIVE OF WOLF TOWNSHIP MELANIE MCCOY, REPRESENTATIVE OF WOLF TOWNSHIP TERRY DINCHER, REPRESENTATIVE OF SHREWSBURY TOWNSHIP REBECCA FOUGHT, REPRESENTATIVE OF EAST LYCOMING RECREATION AUTHORITY DAVID MACIEJEWSKI, REPRESENTATIVE OF EAST LYCOMING SCHOOL DISTRICT MICHAEL PAWLIK, REPRESENTATIVE OF EAST LYCOMING SCHOOL DISTRICT GENE CAHN, REPRESENTATIVE
    [Show full text]
  • COURT of CLAIMS of THE
    REPORTS OF Cases Argued and Determined IN THE COURT of CLAIMS OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS VOLUME 46 Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1994—July 1, 1993-June 30, 1994 SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS 1995 (Printed by authority of the State of Illinois) (X503204—300—7/95) PREFACE The opinions of the Court of Claims reported herein are published by authority of the provisions of Section 18 of the Court of Claims Act, 705 ILCS 505/1 et seq., formerly Ill. Rev. Stat. 1991, ch. 37, par. 439.1 et seq. The Court of Claims has exclusive jurisdiction to hear and determine the following matters: (a) all claims against the State of Illinois founded upon any law of the State, or upon any regulation thereunder by an executive or administrative officer or agency, other than claims arising under the Workers’ Compensation Act or the Workers’ Occupational Diseases Act, or claims for certain expenses in civil litigation, (b) all claims against the State founded upon any contract entered into with the State, (c) all claims against the State for time unjustly served in prisons of this State where the persons imprisoned shall receive a pardon from the Governor stating that such pardon is issued on the grounds of in- nocence of the crime for which they were imprisoned, (d) all claims against the State in cases sounding in tort, (e) all claims for recoupment made by the State against any Claimant, (f) certain claims to compel replacement of a lost or destroyed State warrant, (g) certain claims based on torts by escaped inmates of State insti- tutions, (h) certain representation and indemnification cases, (i) all claims pursuant to the Law Enforcement Officers, Civil De- fense Workers, Civil Air Patrol Members, Paramedics, Firemen & State Employees Compensation Act, (j) all claims pursuant to the Illinois National Guardsman’s Compensation Act, and (k) all claims pursuant to the Crime Victims Compensation Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft 2021 LRTP
    DRAFT SEDA‐COG Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN The Draft Long Range Transportation Plan includes regional overview information and the MPO region’s long range vision for prioritizing transportation investments. This copy of the draft plan is available as part of a 30‐day comment period beginning on May 24, 2021, and ending on June 22, 2021. The public comment period provides the public an opportunity to provide feedback on all facets of the Long Range Transportation Plan before its adoption. The plan can be reviewed online at: http://www.seda‐cog.org/departments/transportation/long‐range‐plan. Written and electronic comments may be submitted via email, SEDA‐COG web portal, fax, or Postal Service by 4:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 22, 2021. Email comments may be submitted to lrtp@seda‐cog.org or through the web portal at http://www.seda‐cog.org/departments/transportation/transportation‐comments Comments may be faxed to 570‐524‐9190 Please address all written comments to: Mr. Don Kiel SEDA‐COG MPO 201 Furnace Road Lewisburg, PA 17837 If you would like to provide comments or discuss the draft plan in person, a Virtual Public Meeting will be held during the public comment period as follows: Date: June 3, 2021 Time: 7:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. Location: The content of this Notice is available in alternative formats and other languages upon request by contacting the SEDA‐COG MPO at 570‐524‐4491, or by written correspondence directed to the MPO at 201 Furnace Road, Lewisburg, PA 17837, or by email at jsaylor@seda‐cog.org.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Annual Report.Pdf
    U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program 2010 Annual Report 2010 Annual Report Department of Energy Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program Executive Summary The mission for the Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program (TEPP) is to ensure federal, state, tribal, and local responders have access to the plans, training, and technical assistance necessary to safely, efficiently, and effectively respond to radiological transportation accidents. To support this mission TEPP has formed strong partnerships over the last 15 years with state, tribal and local response organizations, Federal agencies and other national programs integrating TEPP planning tools and training into a variety of hazardous materials preparedness programs. These partnerships have resulted in states and tribes either using all or portions of the TEPP resources in their programs. Many have adopted the TEPP training program, Modular Emergency Response Radiological Transportation Training (MERRTT), into their hazardous material training curriculums to assist them in preparing their fire departments, law enforcement organizations, hazardous materials response teams, emergency management officials, public information officers and emergency medical technicians to respond to a radiological transportation accidents. This Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 DOE TEPP Annual Report highlights events, outreach, partnerships and training where TEPP has proven to be integral in building radiological response capabilities of states and tribes that may need to respond to radiological incidents. To help build those capacities, TEPP promotes state and tribal implementation by providing responders who successfully complete a MERRTT Train-the-Trainer (T3) course with the tools and knowledge to integrate MERRTT into their state, tribal, or local training programs. TEPP has proven to be an effective and growing preparedness resource across the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • I-180/I-80 Interchange Signing Project
    NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NOTICE OF HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT I-180/I-80 Interchange Signing HSIP-180-9(4); C.N. 13349 Identified as I-180/I-80 Interchange Signing, Construction is tentatively scheduled to begin the proposed project would install new spring of 2018 with completion within three overhead guide signs and two new overhead working days. sign structures at the Interstate 80 (I-80) and The proposed project would require short Interstate 180 (I-180) interchange located within duration detours during the removal and the city limits of Lincoln in Lancaster County. installation of the overhead signs and structures. The proposed project would begin on I-80 at mile The detours would be required for the on/off- marker (MM) 401.00 and end at MM 401.25 and ramps from westbound I-80 to northbound and begin on I-180 at MM 0.00 and end at MM 1.15. southbound I-180 and from northbound I-180 to westbound I-80. All detours would utilize I-80 The purpose of this project is to preserve the Exit 399 and Cornhusker Highway. I-180 and I-80 transportation asset, improve the reliability of the transportation system, and NDOT has worked to develop this project to perpetuate the mobility of the traveling public. minimize inconvenience and hardships. We are The need for this proposed project is based dedicated to improving Nebraska’s Highway on the condition of the overhead signs and system and with your help we can achieve this structures. goal. Proposed construction would consist of removing the existing overhead guide signs and Any questions or comments regarding this project should sign structures and installing new overhead guide be submitted to: Sarah Soula, Public Involvement Manager, Nebraska Department of Transportation, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena - April 2013
    Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena - April 2013 Location Date/Time Deaths & Property & Event Type and Details Injuries Crop Dmg ILLINOIS, Northeast (IL-Z013) DU PAGE 04/08/13 08:39 CST 0.50K Strong Wind (MAX 48 kt) 04/08/13 08:39 CST 0 A strong area of low pressure drove winds to 50 mph across northern Illinois. Minor damage occurred at DuPage Airport on a hanger door. WINNEBAGO COUNTY --- 0.9 SE THE LEDGES [42.41, -88.99] 04/09/13 07:30 CST 0 Hail (0.88 in) 04/09/13 07:40 CST 0 Source: CoCoRaHS WINNEBAGO COUNTY --- 1.5 E THE LEDGES [42.42, -88.97] 04/09/13 07:30 CST 0 Hail (0.88 in) 04/09/13 07:40 CST 0 Source: COOP Observer Nickel size hail covered the ground. WINNEBAGO COUNTY --- 1.5 E THE LEDGES [42.42, -88.97] 04/09/13 08:30 CST 0 Hail (0.88 in) 04/09/13 08:40 CST 0 Source: COOP Observer A second thunderstorm moved over the same area dropping hail up to the size of nickels. The ground was still covered in hail from the previous storm about an hour earlier. A few strong thunderstorms developed over northern Illinois dropping nickel size hail. OGLE COUNTY --- 3.0 ESE ROCHELLE [41.90, -89.02], 2.4 ESE ROCHELLE [41.91, -89.02] 04/10/13 05:40 CST 0.15M Thunderstorm Wind (EG 50 kt) 04/10/13 05:40 CST 0 Source: Law Enforcement Over a dozen semi trucks either jackknifed or flipped onto their side at the Interstate 39 and 88 interchange in southeast Ogle County.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction Suspended Where Possible for July 4
    State of Illinois JB Pritzker, Governor Illinois Department of Transportation Omer Osman, Acting Secretary FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: CONTACT: July 1, 2020 Paul Wappel 217.685.0082 Maria Castaneda 312.447.1919 Construction suspended where possible for July 4 Non-emergency closures called off, but motorists should still expect work zones SPRINGFIELD – The Illinois Department of Transportation announced today that lanes that have been closed for construction will reopen, where possible, for the Fourth of July holiday to minimize travel disruption. Non-emergency closures will be suspended from 3 p.m. July 2 to 11:59 p.m. July 5. The following lane closures will remain in place during the holiday weekend. Work zone speed limits will remain in effect where posted. Please buckle up, put your phone down and drive sober. District 1 City of Chicago: • The following ramps in the Jane Byrne Interchange work zone will remain closed: • o Inbound Kennedy (Interstate 90/94) Expressway exit to inbound Ida B. Wells Drive. o Outbound Dan Ryan Expressway exit to Taylor Street and Roosevelt Road. o Outbound Ida B. Wells Drive entrance from Canal Street. o Outbound Ida B. Wells Drive exit to outbound Dan Ryan. o Outbound Ida B. Wells Drive exit to outbound Kennedy. o Inbound Eisenhower Expressway (Interstate -290) to outbound Kennedy; detour with U-turn posted. o Inbound Eisenhower; lane reductions continue. o Inbound Ida B. Wells Drive; lane reductions continue. • Outbound Kennedy exit at Canfield Road; closed. • Westbound Bryn Mawr Avenue between Harlem and Oriole avenues; lane reductions continue. • Westbound Higgins Avenue between Oriole and Canfield avenues; lane reductions continue.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Four
    CHAPTER FOUR EXISTING TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM INVENTORY WITH NEEDS ASSESSMENT ANALYSIS This Chapter of the WATS Long Range Transportation Plan provides a description of the existing multi-modal transportation system in Lycoming County encompassing highways and bridges, public transportation, airports, railroads and bike / pedestrian facilities. There are no waterway or inland ports located in the County. An inventory of current transportation assets by transportation mode will be provided, including a current physical condition and operational performance needs assessment. This data driven inventory and assessment is important to properly address transportation asset management needs and to improve operational performance of the overall system in terms of public safety, security, efficiency and cost effective movement of people and goods. HIGHWAY SYSTEM Highway Designations / Classification System According to the PennDOT Bureau of Planning and Research, there are 1,995.18 linear miles of publicly owned roadways throughout Lycoming County. PennDOT owns 716.59 linear miles, (35%) of public roadways in Lycoming County. In addition, there are 1,258.86 miles, (63%) of locally-owned roadways owned by 52 different local municipalities included on the PennDOT Liquid Fuels System. Other agencies own the remainder of roads in the County. Lycoming County government only owns two roads which are County Farm Road at the Lysock View county complex housing the Department of Public Safety (911 center), Pre- Release and county farm and an entrance road to the White Deer Recreation Complex. There are federal designations and classifications established for highway systems in the nation as noted in the following sections. Road Functional Classification System The Federal Highway Administration, PennDOT and Metropolitan & Rural Planning Organizations cooperatively establish and update maps that delineate various road classifications which group roadways into a hierarchy based on the type of highway service provided.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Annual Report
    OUR MISSION We provide safe, cost-effective transportation for Illinois in ways that State of Illinois enhance quality of life, promote economic prosperity, and demonstrate Illinois Department of Transportation respect for our environment. OUR GUIDING PRINCIPLES 2009 We will accomplish our mission while making the following principles ANNUAL REPORT the hallmark of all our work: Safety • Integrity • Diversity • Responsiveness • Quality • Innovation CONTENTS OUR VISION The Illinois Department of Transportation will be recognized as the Governor’s Letter . 1 premier state department of transportation in the nation. Secretary’s Letter . 2 QUALITY POLICY Introduction . 3 IDOT will consistently provide safe, cost-effective transportation for Illinois that meets or exceeds the requirements and expectations of Executive Summary . 4 our customers. We will actively pursue ever improving quality through programs that enable each employee to continually strive to do their Aeronautics . 8 job right the first time, every time. Traffic Safety . 11 QUALITY STATEMENT Planning & Programming . 18 Do it right the first time, every time. Finance & Administration . 19 Chief Counsel . 23 Highways . 25 Business & Workforce Diversity . 42 Public & Intermodal Trans . 48 Quality Compliance & Review . 51 Communications . 53 Secretary . 54 Acknowledgements The Honorable Pat Quinn , Governor ARRA Summary . 55 Gary Hannig , Secretary of Transportation 2009 Motorist Survey . 56 Bill Grunloh , Chief of Staff Marva Boyd , Deputy Chief of Staff Conclusion . 58 David Phelps
    [Show full text]
  • Migratory Bird Hunting; Final Frameworks for Late-Season Migratory Bird Hunting Regulations; Final Rule
    Vol. 77 Thursday, No. 183 September 20, 2012 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 20 Migratory Bird Hunting; Final Frameworks for Late-Season Migratory Bird Hunting Regulations; Final Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:13 Sep 19, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\20SER2.SGM 20SER2 srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES2 58444 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 183 / Thursday, September 20, 2012 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR other regulations for hunting migratory discussed proposed 2012–13 hunting game birds under §§ 20.101 through regulations for these species. On August Fish and Wildlife Service 20.107, 20.109, and 20.110 of subpart K. 17, 2012, we published in the Federal Major steps in the 2012–13 regulatory Register (77 FR 49868) the proposed 50 CFR Part 20 cycle relating to open public meetings frameworks for the 2012–13 late-season and Federal Register notifications were migratory bird hunting regulations. This [Docket No. FWS–R9–MB–2012–0005; FF09M21200–123–FXMB1231099BPP0L2] also identified in the April 17 proposed document establishes final frameworks rule. Further, we explained that all for late-season migratory bird hunting RIN 1018–AX97 sections of subsequent documents regulations for the 2012–13 season. outlining hunting frameworks and There are no substantive changes from Migratory Bird Hunting; Final guidelines were organized under the August 17 proposed rule. We will Frameworks for Late-Season Migratory numbered headings. publish State selections in the Federal Bird Hunting Regulations On May 17, 2012, we published in the Register as amendments to §§ 20.101 Federal Register (77 FR 29516) a second through 20.107, and 20.109 of title 50 AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, document providing supplemental CFR part 20.
    [Show full text]
  • Migratory Bird Hunting; Final Frameworks for Early-Season Migratory Bird Hunting Regulations; Final Rule
    Vol. 77 Thursday, No. 169 August 30, 2012 Part VI Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 20 Migratory Bird Hunting; Final Frameworks for Early-Season Migratory Bird Hunting Regulations; Final Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 20:30 Aug 29, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES 53118 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 169 / Thursday, August 30, 2012 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR also identified in the April 17 proposed Population Status and Harvest rule. Further, we explained that all Information on the status of waterfowl Fish and Wildlife Service sections of subsequent documents and information on the status and outlining hunting frameworks and harvest of migratory shore and upland 50 CFR Part 20 guidelines were organized under game birds, including detailed [Docket No. FWS–R9–MB–2012–0005: numbered headings. Subsequent information on methodologies and documents will refer only to numbered FF09M21200–123–FXMB1231099BPP0L2] results, is available at the address items requiring attention. Therefore, it is indicated under FOR FURTHER RIN 1018–AX97 important to note that we omit those INFORMATION CONTACT or from our Web items requiring no attention, and Migratory Bird Hunting; Final site at http://www.fws.gov/ remaining numbered items might be migratorybirds/ Frameworks for Early-Season discontinuous or appear incomplete. Migratory Bird Hunting Regulations On May 17, 2012, we published in the NewsPublicationsReports.html. AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Federal Register (77 FR 29516) a second Review of Public Comments document providing supplemental Interior.
    [Show full text]