Second Language: Trends in Researchand Practice

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Second Language: Trends in Researchand Practice DOCUMENT RESUME ED 187 115 FL 011 267 AUTHoR browz, h. Doug..s, sd.: And Others TITLE an T.c.:SOL '77:i.:eachnng and Learning English Asa Second Language: Trends in Researchand Practice. INSTITUTION Teachers on Englishto Speakers of Other Languages. PUB DATE 77 NOTE Sesented eapers from the TESOL Annual Convention (litn, Miami, FL, April26-May 1, 1977). AVAILABLE FROM TESOL, 2J4 S.C. Transit building,Georgetown 0nnversity, wash:J.(3ton, DC 20057($10.00). EDRS PRICE ME01 Pius Lastage. PC Not Availablefrom SCRS. DESs:RIPTORS *bilinguas Education: Black Students:Communicative Sompetence (Languages); Curriculum Design:Discourse Analysis; Slementary SecondaryEducation: *English (Second Language); Higher Education:Immersion Programs; Interdisciplinary Approach;Language Laboratories; *Language Research:Language Universals: Listening Skills; MaterialDevelopmeat; Reading Processes; Reading Skills;*Second Language 'instruction; *Second Language Learning:Spanish: Tagmemic Anslysis: *reachingMethods: Teotang: Writing Skills ABSTRACT A selection of 47 papers presentedat the 1977 TESOL convention is presen.ted. Partone contains the tour plenary-session papers which present: a comprehensive viewof the teaching-learning process and'related interdisciplinary research:the scope of research on language teaching; some of the largerissues it bilingual education; and a perspectiveon sociocultural variables in the education of blacK children.Part two, on the theory and practiceof teaching, contains enght articleson classroom teaching procedures. Topics concern: a rationale tor classroom grammatical explanations, a systematic outline of articleusage nn English, listening skills, tagmemic theory applied to teaching speakingskills, creative materials development for the languagelaboratory, reading skills and understanding the readingprocess. Part three presents nine articles on recent trends insecnnd language acquisitionresearch. Topics include; aa overview ofrecent trends and models, universal processes and second language data, discourseanalyis and Englishas a Second Language, .communicanive strategies,and a Spanish immersion program. Part tour includes six paperson organizing and evaluating teaching and searning. (Sw) ***************************************************************s****** Reproductions sepp-ned ny are the best that can be maae from the oniginal document. ****A*****************************************************************# 14.1A riTeaching and LearningEnglish h- CDr as a Second Language: r-4Trends in Researchand Practice C311 La Edited by H. Douglas Brown Carlos Alfredo Yorio Ruth H. Crymes -PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS MATERIAL IN MICROFICHE ONLY S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH EDUCATION &INELFRE HAS BEEN GRANTED BY NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF - I _1 EDUCATION ,s1CA111,,,, s (sUr LIME tsiTHAS BEEN REPRO- :, E D *At k AS RECE IVED FROM .4lP1 PSON Oft OPGAMI7AT IONORIGIN- A. (. PI,"47, 0; OE VV 04 OPINIONS `A F Cbc, MOT NE E REPRE^ TO THE EDUCATIOMAL RESOURCES c AL HAT.ONAL INSTrTLITE OF INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC, T,.n, gi),..0 'ON DI POL iCY ON TESOL 977 Selected papers from the Eleventh AnnualConvention of Teachers of English to Speakers of OtherLanguages Miami, Florida April 26May 1, 1977 Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages Washington, D.C. Copyright e. 1477 hy the Teachers of Enghsh to Spval- ot Other Languages Waslangton, I 7.,U.S.A. All right% reser% ed. Printed in t:.U.,ted States of America 1.thrary of Congrf. Ca,.I No. 77-99212 Copies available from: TESOL 455 Nevi's Building Washington, D.C. 20037 Preface The 1977 TESOL Convention, heldin Miami, Florida, April 26 to May 1, marked the beg(ming of the sectmddecade for TESOL,an organization which now encompasses a host of professional interestsand activities.related to teach- ing and learning Englishas a second language. One of the key emphases which convention chairwomanJoan Morley highlighted for theMia ni conven- tion was 'balance of rommtmication"within interestareas, across interest areas, and outside specific TESOL interestareasan appropriate emphasis at a time when TESOL finds itselfso rich in its diversity. Yet there isa centrality of purpose in all the interestareas:to. seek answers to the question of how persons learn English as a second language andhow teachers might_ betteren- able learners to meet their goals. The present volume,a selection of papers presented at the 1977 TESOL Convention, attempts to capture boththe unity and diversity of theconvention. The unity of thepapers in the volume is capsulized in the title whichwe have chosen: Teaching and LearningEnglish as a Secend Language:Trends in Research and Practice.Each paper focuseson either the teaching process or the learningprocess, and often both. An innovative note is struckin each paper, as indicated by the word "trends" in the title.And almost everypaper is prac- tically oriented with solidgrounding in research. The diversity of the TESOLorganization is also reflected in thepresent volume. Topicsnm a wide gamut of subject matter interest: generalstate of the art papers, curriculum and;nurse planning, teaching techniques, theory applied to practice, testing,understanding and teaching several skillareas, and research on linguistic. communicative,and affective factors in second language acquisition. In selecting artides for the volume,the editors have tried to reflect thein- novative 'flavor of research and practicein the profession. A number of the papers, especially the researdi papers in Part 3,present new concepts in early stages of germination. Otherpapers add a new perspective, a new focus, ora new understanding to ctmceptsor terms which have become quite familiar. The 27 papers included herewere sdected front some 85 papers submitted to us. Evt'n mow paperswere presented at the convention but for various reasons were not submitted for publicatimi. Of those thatwere submitted, a number of papers. by mutt.alagreement of the editors, were selected forpos- sible inclusion in the TESOL Qtwrterlyor some other TESOL publication. So, the present 27papers are a small fraction of the papers presentedat the con- vention: nevertheless,we fed that this select:on is representative and indicative of the subjeet matter of the 1977TESOL Convention. Since all of theconvention lii papers were orally presented. many ol the papers printed herepreserve the in- formal st> le of the oral presentations. Part I. Kev net:-i. contains the four pknarvsessionpapers which were sub- mitted to the editorsIt wits our decision to punt all of these specially invited papers in one sectinn. All font paiwrs tatw a somewhat broad oveiview ofa particular topic.Pit Cordrr gives us a comprehensive view of the teaching- karning process with ,in implicit linkto related interdisciplinary research. Rich- ard Tucker refers Wore explicitls toa tremendous scope of research in directMg his comments to the question:can language be taught?llernaii LaFontaine speaks to some of the larger issues in bilingualeducation and Donald Henderson provides a militia. perspectieon sociocultural variables in the education of bh..ck children. Part 2. Teaching. Theory and Practike, consists of eight :Wickson class- room teaching procedt tres. all c:. efullv based on linguistic and psychological research. Tlw subject matterismit comprehensive, but is a representative sample of important topics in theory andpractice:a rationale for classroom grammatical explanations ( Patricia Furey t.a systematic outline of article usage in English (William Acton 1.listening skills( Anna Uhl Chamot ). tagmemic theory applied to teaching sjwaking skills( William Crawford and Beverly Fried ), creatix e, inatei ials development for thelanguage laboratory (Wu Yi So and Doris Scarlett 1. and thre articles relatingto reading skills and under- standing the readingproces.i( Pat Bigg, John Schafer. and Mark Clarke and Linda Burden Part 1.. Learning:Researeh in Second Language Acluisitiim.presents nine articles cm recent trends and experinwntal studies insecond language acquisition research. The past five or sixyears has seen a mnshrooming of interest and inquiry into the acquisition process. Thepapers in this section are representa- tive of practical research whic!I has direct rely\ance to teaching: an overview of recent trends and modds (Stephen KraNhen), universalprocesses and second language data( ( eorgette lolly and Anna Kruso ), two articles on diseomse analysis and ESL ( Diane Larsen-Vreeman and Sue Vander Brook,Karen Schlue, and Chez-R. Campbell )two studies of comnninication and communicative strategies( Elaine Tarone and Stephen Gaies )sonic data from childreu in a Spanish Muni rsion curriculum (Sandra Hann). the stu(ly of affective variables, in this case. sdiesteem( Adelaide Heyde )and 3nother affectively oriented article, anitrospectice. longitudinal study of language acquisition( Francine Sdiurnami and Jolni Schumaim Part .1, Organizing and Evaluating Teaching and Learning, cianhines aspects ot both teaching aml learning thnhigh 5:nditi epicsas developing curricula, understanding classroom processes, and testing and evaluating language corn- petence. The six papers particularly examine: currienhan and syllabusorgan- ization (14ernael Mohrm and William Rutherford ), anew definition of some iv misunderstood terms in teaching Itaitemg ( Peter Strevens. a new perspective on how teachers can gis e feedback to classroomlearners ( Michael Long),pro- ficiency testing( Donahl Bowen). and the always difficulttask of assessing writing proficiency( Karen Niullen In the making of this
Recommended publications
  • Further Evidence for the Developmental Stages of Language Learning and Processability
    US-China Education Review A 9 (2012) 813-825 D Earlier title: US-China Education Review, ISSN 1548-6613 DAVID PUBLISHING Further Evidence for the Developmental Stages of Language Learning and Processability Evelyn Doman Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia; University of Macau, Macau, China Few, if any, researchers would deny the existence of the developmental stages of language learning. However, there are questions about the applicability and the importance of the stages in pedagogy. Up to this point, these questions regarding the ESL (English as a second language) stages have never been addressed in a Japanese post-secondary educational context. This study is the only one of its kind to measure the developmental stages of a group of Japanese university students and to provide the learners with intensive instruction to see how much/if any changes are made to their interlanguage due to the instruction. As predicted by Pienemann’s Teachability Hypothesis (1992), only the learners who had met the prerequisites for instruction could acquire the grammatical points which were instructed. The results of this study point to the need among TESOL (Teaching English as a Second or Other Language) instructors to teach students only slightly above their current language levels. Keywords: developmental stages, Teachability Theory, grammar, SLA (second language acquisition) Introduction Developmental Stages of Second Language SLA (second language acquisition) research suggests overwhelmingly that language learning is a developmental process, which cannot be consciously controlled or predicted by teachers or learners (J. Willis & D. Willis, 2001, p. 179). There is a large amount of evidence supporting the notion that language learning for speakers of any language is systematic, irrespective of whether it is a first or second language (Pienemann, 1995, 1998; Heinsch, 1994; Doughty, 2003; Larsen-Freeman & Long, 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • A Linguistic Perspective on the Acquisition of German As an L2
    i A Linguistic Perspective on the Acquisition of German as an L2 A thesis submitted to the Miami University Honors Program in partial fulfillment of the requirements for University Honors with Distinction by Nicholas D. Stoller (December 2006) Oxford, Ohio ii ABSTRACT A LINGUISTIC PERSPECTIVE ON THE ACQUISITION OF GERMAN AS AN L2 by Nicholas D. Stoller It is obvious that the setting of acquisition, the amount and type of input, and the motivation of learners play a large role in adult second language (L2) acquisition. Many of the theories of L2 acquisition unfortunately fail to adequately take these variables into account. This thesis gives an overview of the current and past theories, including evidence for and against each theory. This is supplemented by an error analysis of second year Miami University students to see if this can give support to any of the current theories. Once that is completed, I examine the relation between input and the possibility of a language learning device such as UG and then move on to pedagogical application of my findings. iii Contents Chapter Page 1 Introduction 1 2 2 The Basis of the Study of L2 Acquisition 2 3 Linguistic Theories of L2 Acquisition 7 3.1 Theories without UG 7 3.1.1 Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis 7 3.1.2 Markedness Difference Hypothesis 8 3.1.3 Fundamental Difference Hypothesis 9 3.1.4 Information Processing Approach 10 3.2 Theories with Partial UG 13 3.2.1 Transfer Hypothesis 13 3.2.2 Krashen’s Comprehension Hypothesis 14 3.3 Theories with Full UG use 19 3.3.1 Identity Hypothesis 19 3.3.2 Full Transfer/Full Access Hypothesis 20 3.4 Overview of the Theories 21 4 Error Analysis and Miami University 2nd 22 Year Students 4.1 Errors of Cases Following Verbs 23 4.2 Errors of Gender of Nouns 25 4.3 Errors of Verb Form 26 4.4 Errors of Umlaut Usage 29 5 Relation of UG and Input 30 6.1 Problems with Input in Classroom Instruction 33 6.2 Pedagogy and L2 Acquisition 35 7 Conclusion 40 Bibliography 42 iv 1 A Linguistic Perspective on the Acquisition of German as an L2 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Exposing Corruption in Progressive Rock: a Semiotic Analysis of Gentle Giant’S the Power and the Glory
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--Music Music 2019 EXPOSING CORRUPTION IN PROGRESSIVE ROCK: A SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS OF GENTLE GIANT’S THE POWER AND THE GLORY Robert Jacob Sivy University of Kentucky, [email protected] Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.13023/etd.2019.459 Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Sivy, Robert Jacob, "EXPOSING CORRUPTION IN PROGRESSIVE ROCK: A SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS OF GENTLE GIANT’S THE POWER AND THE GLORY" (2019). Theses and Dissertations--Music. 149. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/music_etds/149 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Music at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--Music by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained needed written permission statement(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine) which will be submitted to UKnowledge as Additional File. I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known.
    [Show full text]
  • Child Linguistic Development
    Linguistic Development Andrew Matthews 5th June 1996 1 CONTENTS 2 Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Language Acquisition 4 2.1 Social Influences On Development . 6 3 History 7 3.1 Diary Studies: till 1930 . 7 3.2 Large Sample Studies: 1930 - 1957 . 7 3.3 Linguistic Studies: 1957 onwards . 7 4 What Is It That Develops? 8 4.1 The Communication Chain . 9 4.1.1 The Brain . 9 4.1.2 Neurological Encoding . 12 4.1.3 Anatomical-Physiological Encoding . 14 4.1.4 Auditory Reception . 15 5 Normal And Deviant Development 16 6 The Prelinguistic Period 17 7 The Holophrastic Period 19 8 The Telegraphic Period 20 9 The Complex Period 22 10 The Intuitive Linguistic Period 25 11 Developmental Theories 26 11.1 Baby Talk Register . 27 11.2 Social Theories Of Development . 30 12 Glossary 32 LIST OF TABLES 3 List of Tables 1 Consonantal divisions according to place of articulation . 14 2 Piaget's stages of cognitive development. ..................... 17 3 General stages of Linguistic development. ..................... 17 4 General stages of phonological development. ................... 18 5 Common categories of meaning (semantic relations) expressed in children's earliest sentences .................................... 21 6 Order of acquisition of English grammatical morphemes. 23 7 Progressive acquisition of the negation-transformation rules . 24 8 Examples of negative sentences showing the three developmental stages of negative sentences. ................................... 25 9 Expansion and Recasting { do they accelerate development? . 27 1 INTRODUCTION 4 1 Introduction This report is a general overview of current knowledge on linguistic development. It covers four main aspects of the subject. It begins by briefly covering the history of methodologies for studying development, with references to diary studies, large sample studies , and linguistic studies .
    [Show full text]
  • Two Multilinguality Portraits of Learners of Norwegian
    Reading in a Foreign Language April 2018, Volume 30, No. 1 ISSN 1539-0578 pp. 29–48 Multilinguals and extensive reading: Two multilinguality portraits of learners of Norwegian Anna M. Krulatz Norwegian University of Science and Technology Norway Jennifer Duggan Norwegian University of Science and Technology Norway Abstract This paper presents an exploratory-interpretive study of two multilingual adults acquiring Norwegian through extensive reading. The study examined social and cognitive aspects of language acquisition, and individual factors, such as the language learning behaviors, experiences, attitudes, and beliefs of the participants. The data were collected using background self-reports, diaries in which the participants recorded their extensive reading and related language learning experiences, and semi-structured interviews. To represent adult language learning from a multilingual perspective, the data were analyzed qualitatively using a priori themes derived from the ecological model of multilinguality (Aronin, 2016; Aronin & Ó Laoire, 2004; Aronin & Singleton, 2012). The findings suggest that environment, previous education, reasons for learning a language, and previous knowledge of other languages affect how multilingual learners approach language learning and how they use a new language. Keywords: multilingual learners, ecological model, diary study, individual learner differences, Norwegian, dominant language constellation The majority of studies on multilingual language acquisition and extensive reading to date have focused on quantifiable measures and benefits (e.g., Beglar & Hunt, 2014; Elley & Mangubhai, 1983; Nation, 2015; Pigada & Schmitt, 2006). However, qualitative data about individuals is also a valuable source of information (Larsen-Freeman & Cameron, 2008). The present study explored the benefits of extensive reading to adult multilingual language learners, the researcher- diarists, with the goal of capturing their perspectives on their language learning behaviors, attitudes, and preferences related to extensive reading.
    [Show full text]
  • The Comparative Fallacy: an Analysis and Discussion of Selected Research
    Teachers College, Columbia University Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, Vol. 4, No. 1 The Forum The Comparative Fallacy: An Analysis and Discussion of Selected Research Eun-Young Kwon INTRODUCTION Ever since the introduction of the “independent grammars assumption,” whereby a child is said to have its own grammar and not just an imitation of adult language, first language (L1) acquisition researchers such as Martin Braine (1963) and others have constructed grammars for children’s languages rather than treat them as defective adult grammars. This is based on the view that language learners create grammars of their own, rather than master the target grammar imperfectly. Thus, at any moment, a child’s grammar is an independent system. In second language acquisition (SLA) research this notion has led to several slightly variant conclusions. On the one hand, second language (L2) learners should be treated as already having a language of their own, not just as poor beginning learners of the target language, and should be encouraged to create a system from experience and internal resources rather than have the target language thrust down their throats by teachers (Johnson & Johnson, 1998). In reality, however, as Cook (1999) asserts, “SLA research has often fallen into the comparative fallacy (Bley- Vroman, 1983) of relating the L2 learner to the native speaker” (p. 189). In other words, the learner’s language is typically explained by reference to the target language system, rather than treated as an independent set of rules and performance characteristics. The aim of this paper is to examine two empirical studies in SLA from the perspective of the comparative fallacy: the studies of Dulay and Burt (1974) and Mendizabal (2001), both of which address L2 learners’ morpheme acquisition order.
    [Show full text]
  • Order of Acquisition: a Comparison of L1 and L2 English and Spanish
    Running head: ORDER OF ACQUISITION 1 Order of Acquisition A Comparison of L1 and L2 English and Spanish Morpheme Acquisition Kyle McFerren A Senior Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation in the Honors Program Liberty University Spring 2015 ORDER OF ACQUISITION 2 Acceptance of Senior Honors Thesis This Senior Honors Thesis is accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation from the Honors Program of Liberty University. ______________________________ Paul Müller, Ph.D. Thesis Chair ______________________________ Stephanie Blankenship, M.A. Committee Member ______________________________ Michael Babcock, Ph.D. Committee Member ______________________________ Brenda Ayres, Ph.D. Honors Director ______________________________ Date ORDER OF ACQUISITION 3 Abstract This paper examines the order of acquisition for grammatical morphemes in Spanish and English first and second language learners. Brown’s first morpheme order study, conducted in 1973, laid the foundation for what would become one of the most common types of study conducted within the field of second language acquisition. The four orders of acquisition relevant here are examined and compared in order to support the roles of salience, morphophonological regularity, complexity, input frequency, and native language transfer in first and/or second language acquisition. The conclusion is that these five determinants work interdependently in determining the difficulty of acquiring a particular morpheme in second language acquisition, and the same factors, except native language transfer, work together in first language acquisition as well, to varying degrees. ORDER OF ACQUISITION 4 Order of Acquisition A Comparison of L1 and L2 English and Spanish Morpheme Acquisition For decades, researchers have conducted morpheme order studies, also known as natural order studies, in hopes of gaining greater insight into how language learners (LLs) learn a language.
    [Show full text]
  • INSTITUTION Congress of the US, Washington, DC. House Committee
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 303 136 IR 013 589 TITLE Commercialization of Children's Television. Hearings on H.R. 3288, H.R. 3966, and H.R. 4125: Bills To Require the FCC To Reinstate Restrictions on Advertising during Children's Television, To Enforce the Obligation of Broadcasters To Meet the Educational Needs of the Child Audience, and for Other Purposes, before the Subcommittee on Telecommunications and Finance of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, One Hundredth Congress (September 15, 1987 and March 17, 1988). INSTITUTION Congress of the U.S., Washington, DC. House Committee on Energy and Commerce. PUB DATE 88 NOTE 354p.; Serial No. 100-93. Portions contain small print. AVAILABLE FROM Superintendent of Documents, Congressional Sales Office, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. PUB TYPE Legal/Legislative/Regulatory Materials (090) -- Viewpoints (120) -- Reports - Evaluative/Feasibility (142) EDRS PRICE MFO1 /PC15 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Advertising; *Childrens Television; *Commercial Television; *Federal Legislation; Hearings; Policy Formation; *Programing (Broadcast); *Television Commercials; Television Research; Toys IDENTIFIERS Congress 100th; Federal Communications Commission ABSTRACT This report provides transcripts of two hearings held 6 months apart before a subcommittee of the House of Representatives on three bills which would require the Federal Communications Commission to reinstate restrictions on advertising on children's television programs. The texts of the bills under consideration, H.R. 3288, H.R. 3966, and H.R. 4125 are also provided. Testimony and statements were presented by:(1) Representative Terry L. Bruce of Illinois; (2) Peggy Charren, Action for Children's Television; (3) Robert Chase, National Education Association; (4) John Claster, Claster Television; (5) William Dietz, Tufts New England Medical Center; (6) Wallace Jorgenson, National Association of Broadcasters; (7) Dale L.
    [Show full text]
  • “I Can Speak German - Und Deutsch” the Development and Use of Code-Switching Among Simultaneous and Successive English-German Bilingual Children
    “I can speak German - und Deutsch” The Development and Use of Code-Switching among Simultaneous and Successive English-German Bilingual Children Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde der Philologischen Fakultät der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg i. Br. vorgelegt von Esther Albrecht, geb. Liebner aus Hannover WS 2003/2004 Erstgutachterin: Prof. Dr. Brigitte Halford Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Bernd Kortmann Drittgutachter: Prof. Dr. Peter Auer Vorsitzende des Promotionsausschusses der Gemeinsamen Kommission der Philologischen, Philosophischen und Wirtschafts- und Verhaltenswissenschaftlichen Fakultät: Prof. Dr. Elisabeth Cheauré Datum der Fachprüfung im Promotionsfach: 09.07.2004 CONTENTS List of Figures vi List of Tables vii Acknowledgements ix O. INTRODUCTION 1 0.1 Introduction 1 0.2 Overview 3 1. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND 6 1.1 Bilingual Language Acquisition 6 1.1.1 Bilingualism 6 1.1.1.1 Definition and research areas 6 1.1.1.2 Types 7 1.1.1.3 Degree 8 1.1.1.4 Factors influencing bilingualism 9 1.1.1.5 Bilingualism and Intelligence and Cognition 10 1.1.2 Becoming and Staying Bilingual 11 1.1.3 Language Acquisition 13 1.1.3.1 Bilingual First Language Acquisition 14 1.1.3.2 Successive Language Acquisition 15 1.1.3.3 One or Two Language Systems? 18 1.1.3.4 Language Input 21 1.2 Code-Switching 23 1.2.1 History to the Study of Code-Switching 24 1.2.2 Language Contact Phenomena 25 1.2.2.1 Code-Mixing and Code-Switching 25 1.2.2.2 Borrowing 27 1.2.2.3 Interference 28 1.2.3 Grammatical Aspects to the Study of Code-Switching 29
    [Show full text]
  • BUCLD 44 Schedule and Abstracts | Conference on Language Development
    11/7/2019 BUCLD 44 Schedule and Abstracts | Conference on Language Development Linguistics Conference on Language Development BUCLD 44 Schedule and Abstracts THE 44TH BOSTON UNIVERSITY CONFERENCE ON LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT NOVEMBER 7–10, 2019 GEORGE SHERMAN UNION, BOSTON UNIVERSITY Registration opens at 8:00am each day starting on Friday. Please note that this year’s Student Workshop will be held on Thursday, November 7th following the Society for Language Development Symposium at 6:30pm, with refreshments available starting at 6. Fri | Sat | Sun | Alternates | Fri posters | Sat posters Thursday, November 7, 2019 STUDENT WORKSHOP (East Balcony) 6:30 – 7:30 Careers in the Field of Communication Sciences and Disorders*: Why and How *also known as Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences. Sudha Arunachalam (New York University) Abstract(s) for presentation(s) above Careers in the Field of Communication Sciences and Disorders*: Why and How *also known as Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences Sudha Arunachalam (New York University) The field of communication disorders (sometimes called CSD; Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences; or clinical linguistics) is an interdisciplinary field that draws from linguistics, psychology, and neuroscience, as well as clinical approaches to language and communication disorders (speech-language pathology). Many of you probably already have research programs or research interests that would fit well in this field. In this session, we’ll talk about how your research might fit into such a department and about the academic career path. We’ll also talk about how to position yourself to be competitive on this track, considering all ranks from those just planning to go to graduate school through to postdocs currently on the job market.
    [Show full text]
  • Third Language Acquisition: Crosslinguistic Influence
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Diposit Digital de Documents de la UAB Third Language Acquisition: Cross-Linguistic Influence from L1 and L2 TFG Estudis Anglesos Supervisor: Montserrat Capdevila i Batet Javiera Paz Duhalde Solís June 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ................................................................................................................1 1. Introduction .....................................................................................................2 2. Third Language Acquisition (TLA) .................................................................4 2.1. Towards a definition of TLA ............................................................4 2.2. Bilingualism vs. Multilingualism ......................................................6 2.3. Third Language Acquisition (TLA) vs. Second Language Acquisition (SLA)¼¼........................................................................... 7 2.4. Bilingualism versus Second Language Acquisition: two paths to the acquisition of an L3 .................................¼¼¼¼¼.............................8 3. Cross-Linguistic Influence (CLI) ...................................................................10 3.1. Typological distance ........................................................................11 3.2. L2 status ...........................................................................................15 4. Conclusion ......................................................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • A Corpus Based Study in Morpheme Acquisition Order of Young Learners of English
    Report nr: 2012ht00268 Department of Education Degree Project in Educational Sciences within General Education Studies, 15 credits Fall 2012 A Corpus Based Study in Morpheme Acquisition Order of Young Learners of English A comparison of Swedish students in grade 6 and grade 7 Su Yin Khor Supervisor: Christine Johansson, Ph.D., Department of English. Examiner: David Kronlid, Ph.D., Department of Education. 2 ABSTRACT This study investigated the morpheme acquisition order of Swedish students in grades 6 and 7, utilizing corpus texts drawn from the Uppsala Learner English Corpus (ULEC). It is an extension of Khor (2012) that focused on students in grades 9 and 12. Previous studies on morpheme acquisition order suggested that there was a natural sequence in acquiring morphemes, regardless of first language (L1). First language influence was said to be minimal or non-existing. Recently, studies have found evidence that L1 transfer is greater than first thought. This study examined three morphemes; articles, the preposition in, and plural form. The results showed that the errors that both groups made were consistent with the errors that were found in Khor (2012). The errors were of the same nature in all age groups, mainly in differences in (1) generic and specific usage of articles in Swedish and English, (2) the generic sense of regular plural nouns, (3) plural form of irregular nouns and nouns of Latin or Greek origin, (4) plural forms of countable and misuse of uncountable nouns, and (5) the usage of prepositions in Swedish and English. Current studies have also generated these results, which points towards strong L1 influence.
    [Show full text]