The Bangsamoro Outlook on the Millennium Development Goals
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
OGC-98-5 U.S. Insular Areas: Application of the U.S. Constitution
United States General Accounting Office Report to the Chairman, Committee on GAO Resources, House of Representatives November 1997 U.S. INSULAR AREAS Application of the U.S. Constitution GAO/OGC-98-5 United States General Accounting Office GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 Office of the General Counsel B-271897 November 7, 1997 The Honorable Don Young Chairman Committee on Resources House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: More than 4 million U.S. citizens and nationals live in insular areas1 under the jurisdiction of the United States. The Territorial Clause of the Constitution authorizes the Congress to “make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property” of the United States.2 Relying on the Territorial Clause, the Congress has enacted legislation making some provisions of the Constitution explicitly applicable in the insular areas. In addition to this congressional action, courts from time to time have ruled on the application of constitutional provisions to one or more of the insular areas. You asked us to update our 1991 report to you on the applicability of provisions of the Constitution to five insular areas: Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (the CNMI), American Samoa, and Guam. You asked specifically about significant judicial and legislative developments concerning the political or tax status of these areas, as well as court decisions since our earlier report involving the applicability of constitutional provisions to these areas. We have included this information in appendix I. 1As we did in our 1991 report on this issue, Applicability of Relevant Provisions of the U.S. -
Ethnic and Religious Conflict in Southern Philippines: a Discourse on Self-Determination, Political Autonomy, and Conflict Resolution
Ethnic and Religious Conflict in Southern Philippines: A Discourse on Self-Determination, Political Autonomy, and Conflict Resolution Jamail A. Kamlian Professor of History at Mindanao State University- ILigan Institute of Technology (MSU-IIT), ILigan City, Philippines ABSTRACT Filipina kini menghadapi masalah serius terkait populasi mioniritas agama dan etnis. Bangsa Moro yang merupakan salah satu etnis minoritas telah lama berjuang untuk mendapatkan hak untuk self-determination. Perjuangan mereka dilancarkan dalam berbagai bentuk, mulai dari parlemen hingga perjuangan bersenjata dengan tuntutan otonomi politik atau negara Islam teroisah. Pemberontakan etnis ini telah mengakar dalam sejarah panjang penindasan sejak era kolonial. Jika pemberontakan yang kini masih berlangsung itu tidak segera teratasi, keamanan nasional Filipina dapat dipastikan terancam. Tulisan ini memaparkan latar belakang historis dan demografis gerakan pemisahan diri yang dilancarkan Bangsa Moro. Setelah memahami latar belakang konflik, mekanisme resolusi konflik lantas diajukan dalam tulisan ini. Kata-Kata Kunci: Bangsa Moro, latar belakang sejarah, ekonomi politik, resolusi konflik. The Philippines is now seriously confronted with problems related to their ethnic and religious minority populations. The Bangsamoro (Muslim Filipinos) people, one of these minority groups, have been struggling for their right to self-determination. Their struggle has taken several forms ranging from parliamentary to armed struggle with a major demand of a regional political autonomy or separate Islamic State. The Bangsamoro rebellion is a deep- rooted problem with strong historical underpinnings that can be traced as far back as the colonial era. It has persisted up to the present and may continue to persist as well as threaten the national security of the Republic of the Philippines unless appropriate solutions can be put in place and accepted by the various stakeholders of peace and development. -
Unorganized Territory
UNORGANIZED TERRITORY FISCAL YEAR 2013 ANNUAL REPORT 1 UNORGANIZED TERRITORY Phone Assistance State Offices Education in the Unorganized Territory - Education and related services - 624-6892 Fiscal Administrator - Budgets and expenditures - 624-6250 Forest Protection Division - Forest fire prevention - 287-4990 Forest Service - Timber harvesting and land management - 287-2791 General Assistance - Emergency assistance - 624-4138 Land Resource Regulation - Large residential, wind, commercial or industrial development - 287-7688 Land Use Planning Commission (LUPC) - Planning and zoning board - 287-2631 Maine Revenue Service - Assessment and collection of property taxes - 624-5611 Plumbing inspectors - 287-5672 County Offices County Offices Telephone Aroostook County 493-3318 Franklin County 778-6614 Hancock County 667-9542 Kennebec County 622-0971 Knox County 594-0420 Lincoln County 882-6311 Oxford County 743-6359 Penobscot County 942-8535 Piscataquis County 564-2161 Sagadahoc County 443-8200 Somerset County 474-9861 Waldo County 338-3282 Washington County 255-3127 Cover Photo: “Allagash Lake, T7 & 8 R14 WELS, Piscataquis County” Photo by John Baker 2 STATE OF MAINE OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR 66 STATE HOUSE STATION AUGUSTA, MAINE 04333-0066 TEL: (207) 624-6250 FAX: (207) 624-6273 MARCIA C. McINNIS, CGA POLA A. BUCKLEY, CPA, CISA FISCAL ADMINISTRATOR STATE AUDITOR Unorganized Territory Division January 26, 2015 To the Taxpayers of the Unorganized Territory: The Fiscal Administrator for the Unorganized Territory (UT) within the Office of the State Auditor prepares an annual report directed to the property taxpayers of the UT. This report is required by Maine State statutes and includes audited financial statements and information on the operation, and services available to residents of the UT. -
Conversing with the Cosmos
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Textile Society of America Symposium Proceedings Textile Society of America 2000 CONVERSING WITH THE COSMOS Linda L. Beeman Textile Society of America Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/tsaconf Beeman, Linda L., "CONVERSING WITH THE COSMOS" (2000). Textile Society of America Symposium Proceedings. 782. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/tsaconf/782 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Textile Society of America at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Textile Society of America Symposium Proceedings by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Pis siyabet/rom Jolo Island, Sulu Archipelago. Interlocking tapestry weave o/silk. Warp 36", weft 34". Private collection. Photograph by Mike Zens/or Material Possessions. CONVERSING WITH THE COSMOS 102000 Linda L. Beeman This paper focu ses on the silk tapestry headcloths woven by Tausug peoples from the Philippine Su lu Archipelago. Called pis siyabet, they captured my attention because they diverge so wildly from the cotton or abaca warp ikat weaving one associates with indigenous peoples from the Philippines and Indonesia. Their material, structure, motif and color fly in the face of local tradition. The dense complexity created by their interlocking square, triangle and diamond motifs suggests cosmic mazes - treasure maps to the unconscious. Pis puzzle us and compel our imaginations. Some history is in order. The Philippine Archipelago was fi rst peopled during the Pleistocene when it was connected by land bridges with the Southeast Asia main land. What became the Sulus offered a wann climate, access to water trade, fertile volcanic soils. -
Toward Peace in the Southern Philippines
UNITED STATES InsTITUTE OF PEACE www.usip.org SPECIAL REPORT 1200 17th Street NW • Washington, DC 20036 • 202.457.1700 • fax 202.429.6063 ABOUT THE REPORT G. Eugene Martin and Astrid S. Tuminez In 2003 the U.S. Department of State asked the United States Institute of Peace (USIP) to undertake a project to help expedite a peace agreement between the government of the Republic of the Philippines (GRP) and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF). The MILF has been engaged in a rebellion against the GRP for more than three decades, Toward Peace in the with the conflict concentrated on the southern island of Mindanao and the Sulu Archipelago. This report highlights USIP activities in the Philippines from 2003 to 2007. It Southern Philippines describes the conflict and its background, the substance of ongoing negotiations, USIP efforts to “facilitate” the peace process, and insights on potentially constructive steps for A Summary and Assessment of the USIP moving the Philippine peace talks forward. It concludes with a few lessons learned from USIP’s engagement in this Philippine Facilitation Project, 2003–2007 specific conflict, as well as general observations about the potential value of a quasi-governmental entity such as USIP in facilitating negotiations in other conflicts. G. Eugene Martin was the executive director of the Philippine Facilitation Project. He is a retired Foreign Summary Service officer who served as deputy chief of mission at the • The Muslim inhabitants of Mindanao and Sulu in the southern Philippines, known U.S. Embassy in Manila. Astrid S. Tuminez served as the project’s senior research associate. -
Slave Markets and Exchange in the Malay World: the Sulu Sultanate, 1770-1878
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Research Repository Slave Markets and Exchange in theMalay World: The Sulu Sultanate, 1770-1878 JAMES F. WARREN The impact of the West's commercial intrusion in China towards the end of the eighteenth century had significant bearing on the growth of the slave trade in South east Asia. It led to the crystallization of a permanent slave traffic around organized markets and depots in the Sulu Archipelago. Jolo Island, as the centre of a redistributive network encompassing the Sulu zone, became the most important slave centre by 1800.1 This had not always been the case. Most accounts of the Sulu Sultanate written before 1780 indicate that the internal demand for slaves at Jolo was on a much smaller scale than itwas destined to become in the nineteenth century. These early writers reported that it was often more profitable for the Taosug, the dominant ethnic group in the Sulu Archipelago, to deliver slaves to the Magindanao and Bugis merchants of Cotabato (Mindanao) and Pasir (Borneo) for trans-ship ment to Makassar and Batavia, than employ them in their own settlements.2 Sulu's ascendancy in the late eighteenth century developed out of the expanding trade between India, insular Southeast Asia and China. Commercial and tributary activity became linked with long-distance slave raiding and incorporation of captured peoples in a system to service the procurement of trading produce which made Jolo the Mecca for marine and jungle products for the China trade. Slaves stopped being re-exported to foreign parts by Taosug datus (aristocrats) when international trade to Sulu escalated and the large scale use of slave labour in the fisheries and fields and in raiding prahus became essential for the growth of the Taosug state. -
General Assembly Distr.: General 6 March 2014
United Nations A/AC.109/2014/13 General Assembly Distr.: General 6 March 2014 Original: English Special Committee on the Situation with regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples American Samoa Working paper prepared by the Secretariat Contents Page The Territory at a glance ......................................................... 3 I. Constitutional, legal and political issues ............................................ 4 II. Budget ....................................................................... 7 III. Economic conditions ............................................................ 7 A. General ................................................................... 7 B. Fisheries and agriculture .................................................... 8 C. Tourism .................................................................. 8 D. Transport and communications ............................................... 9 E. Water, sanitation system and utilities .......................................... 9 IV. Social conditions ............................................................... 10 A. General ................................................................... 10 B. Labour and immigration ..................................................... 10 C. Education ................................................................. 11 Note: The information contained in the present working paper has been derived from public sources, including those of the territorial Government, -
Ship Reporting System for East Coast of Sabah, Sulu Archipelago and West Coast of Mindanao - Transit Corridors
SECURITY RELATED INFORMATION TO MARINERS Q6112/2018/001 Ship Reporting System for East Coast of Sabah, Sulu Archipelago and West Coast of Mindanao - Transit Corridors. The three signatories of the Trilateral Cooperative Arrangement (TCA), Indonesia, Malaysia and The Philippines have agreed to the establishment of Transit Corridors within the Area of Maritime Interest (AMI), which covers the Common Maritime Areas. The Transit Corridors serve as safety areas which are patrolled by the three countries to allow safe passage of commercial traffic. 1. Reporting requirements 24 Hours prior to arrival All vessels are required to send a report to the National Coast Watch Centre (NCWC), Littoral Monitoring Station (LMS) Bongao, Coast Guard Action Centre (CGAC), Naval Operation Centre (NOC), MCC Malaysia and MCC Indonesia at least 24 hours before arrival at the designated maritime areas of common concern with complete ship’s routeing information. AGENCY EMAIL ADDRESS / CONTACT National Coast Watch Centre (NCWC) [email protected] +63 (2) 2413104 Littoral Monitoring Station (LMS), Bongao, TawiTawi [email protected] +63 (917) 7742293 Naval Operation Centre (NOC), Philippine Navy [email protected] [email protected] +63 (917) 8512708 +63 (2) 5244981 Coast Guard Action Centre (CGAC), Philippine Coast [email protected] Guard +63 (917) 7243682 +63 (2) 5273877 Naval Forces Western Mindanao Operation Centre [email protected] [email protected] +63 (917) 6860681 Maritime Research Information Centre (MRIC) [email protected] +63 (917) 7085248 +63 (2) 8431833 Maritime Command Centre (MCC), Tawau, Malaysia [email protected] +6089 775600 +6089 779777 +6089 982623 (5.00pm – 8.00am) Eastern Sabah Security Command (ESSCOM), Malaysia [email protected] +6089 863181 Marine Department Malaysia, Sabah Region [email protected] +6088 401111 Maritime Command Centre (MCC), Tarakan, Indonesia [email protected] [email protected] +625513806288 +625513806289 2. -
The State-Moro Conflict in the Philippines
The State-Moro Conflict in the Philippines Lisa Huang, Victor Musembi and Ljiljana Petronic June 21, 2012 INAF 5439 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The struggle for self-determination by the Moro people in the Southern Philippines began in 1565 under Spanish colonial rule and is still an unresolved conflict today. Rooted in primordial notions of homeland, indoctrination, social marginalization, and historical displacement, the Moro people and the government have engaged in multiple rounds of negotiations and produced several agreements. Currently, the Moro conflict is one of two large, deeply-rooted, and long lasting insurgencies featuring repeated peace processes in the Philippines; the other being the stop-start process of peace negotiations with the communist insurgents. The Moro people are composed of Sunni Muslims with varying linguistic groups which lack unity. The fragmented rebel groups, including the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) group and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF), have weak legitimacy and bargaining power because of varying interests. The Muslim community perceives that there is a lack of government commitment to provide public goods in tandem to the latter‘s claim of authority over their territory. Furthermore, even though the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) is richly endowed with natural and human resources, poverty and development remain as large concerns. The Moro people view territory as a means to securing an identity, while Manila‘s view of territory is directly linked to its physical survival. In addition to territorial claims, the Moro people have experienced social, political and economic discrimination, creating grievances, which, however, are not considered ‗atypically severe‘1 but rather limited to ‗neglect and remedial policies‘2. -
'Battle of Marawi': Death and Destruction in the Philippines
‘THE BATTLE OF MARAWI’ DEATH AND DESTRUCTION IN THE PHILIPPINES Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 7 million people who campaign for a world where human rights are enjoyed by all. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. © Amnesty International 2017 Except where otherwise noted, content in this document is licensed under a Creative Commons Cover photo: Military trucks drive past destroyed buildings and a mosque in what was the main battle (attribution, non-commercial, no derivatives, international 4.0) licence. area in Marawi, 25 October 2017, days after the government declared fighting over. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode © Ted Aljibe/AFP/Getty Images For more information please visit the permissions page on our website: www.amnesty.org Where material is attributed to a copyright owner other than Amnesty International this material is not subject to the Creative Commons licence. First published in 2017 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson House, 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW, UK Index: ASA 35/7427/2017 Original language: English amnesty.org CONTENTS MAP 4 1. INTRODUCTION 5 2. METHODOLOGY 10 3. BACKGROUND 11 4. UNLAWFUL KILLINGS BY MILITANTS 13 5. HOSTAGE-TAKING BY MILITANTS 16 6. ILL-TREATMENT BY GOVERNMENT FORCES 18 7. ‘TRAPPED’ CIVILIANS 21 8. LOOTING BY ALL PARTIES TO THE CONFLICT 23 9. -
A Comparison of Census Geographic Areas of Canada and the United States
Geography Working Paper Series No. 1993-1 A Comparison of Census Geographic Areas of Canada and the United States by Carolyn Weiss Geography Division Statistics Canada Michael Ratcliffe and Nancy Torrieri Geography Division U.S. Bureau of the Census August 1993 Revised November 1993 Catalogue no. 92F0138MIE, no. 1993-1 ISSN 1481-174X Aussi disponible en français. This paper represents the views of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the opinions of Statistics Canada. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by Statistics Canada. Geography Working Paper Series The Geography Working Paper Series is intended to stimulate discussion on a variety of topics covering conceptual, methodological or technical work to support the development and dissemination of the division’s data, products and services. Readers of the series are encouraged to contact the authors with comments, criticisms and suggestions. A list of titles appears at the end of this paper. A paper version, catalogue no. 92F0138MPE, is available for $10.00 per issue. Outside Canada the cost is US $10.00. All prices exclude sales tax. There is no charge for downloading the document yourself on the Internet (http://www.statcan.ca). For inquiries about the working paper series, please contact: Geo-Help Geography Division Statistics Canada Jean Talon Building, 3rd floor Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0T6 Telephone: (613) 951-3889 FAX: (613) 951-0569 Internet: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ........................................................................ii 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................. 1 2. PAIRING OF GEOGRAPHIC AREAS ................................................. 1 3. SUMMARY ..................................................................... 9 REFERENCES .................................................................... 10 Appendix 1. -
COUNTY of HANCOCK Office of the Unorganized Territories 50 State Street, Suite 7 Ellsworth, Maine 04605
COUNTY OF HANCOCK Office of the Unorganized Territories 50 State Street, Suite 7 Ellsworth, Maine 04605 Commissioners: Steven E. Joy, Chairman Millard A. Billings Percy L. Brown, Jr, District II Unorganized Territory Supervisor Antonio Blasi, District III E 9-1-1 Addressing Agent Dear Unorganized Territory Landowner: On behalf of the Hancock County Commissioners, I am writing this letter as a courtesy to landowners in the Hancock County Unorganized Territories that have structures on their properties. I have used the Maine Revenue Services 2013 Valuation Book as a reference to determine which properties had structures and the owners and their addresses. If you have received this letter in error please disregard. Title 30-A of the Maine Revised Statutes section 7501, states as follows: The county commissioners of each county may provide or contract for the provision of the following municipal services for the residents of the unorganized territory in their county: 1. Fire protection. Fire protection other than forest fires; In the event of a forest fire, Maine Forest Service is the responding agency. The County currently has agreements for structure fire coverage with the following agencies for the corresponding Townships and is in the negotiation process for additional coverage; Burlington - T3ND, Oqiton, T40MD West Lake-Nicatous Club & T41ND north of Gassabias Stream. Cherryfield – T10SD Ellsworth – Fletcher’s Landing Township Sullivan- Tunk Lake Road 2. Solid Waste. The County currently has agreements for solid waste services with the