DOCSLIB.ORG

Heritage Matters

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Heritage Matters NATIONAL PARK SERVICE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR HERITAGE MATTERS NEWS OF THE NATION’S DIVERSE CULTURAL HERITAGE Cultural Resources Diversity Program Marks Its Fifth Year INSIDE THIS ISSUE Antoinette J. Lee programs directed at developing 101(j)(I)—which directs the National Park Service AAEF parks list, p. 18 diverse professionals. Today, the Secretary of the Interior, in consul- Diversity Program encompasses a tation with other entities, to devel- Conferences When the Cultural Resources upcoming, p. 23 Diversity Program was initiated in series of programs directed at op “technical or financial assis- Exhibit planned, p. 16 the fall of 1998, it was envisioned diversifying not only the profession, tance, or both, to historically black but also the communities served by colleges and universities (HBCU), National Register as primarily a workforce effort. listings, p. 8 National Park Service managers National Park Service programs to tribal colleges, and to colleges and parks and the resources that with a high enrollment of Native Native American wanted the cultural resources staff museum profile, p. 12 to better reflect the diversity of the are identified, protected, and inter- Americans or Native Hawaiians, to preted. A special issue of CRM establish preservation training and Publications nation and the park units that were of note, p. 23 being added to the National Park (Volume 22, No. 8, 1999), which was degree programs.” devoted to “Diversity and Cultural These training efforts included Tribal preservation System. In its early phase, the offices list, p. 13 Diversity Program’s major efforts Resources” describes the program’s cooperation on a lecture series on included the development of the work with minority universities and the Underground Railroad in the Cultural Resources Diversity organizations to develop training Mid-Atlantic region at Delaware Internship Program (see page 2); programs for their constituencies. State University, the first HBCU to the preparation of a biannual This focus was based on one of the offer a M.A. degree program in newsletter, Heritage Matters; and 1992 amendments to the National historic preservation; cooperation cooperation on a range of training Historic Preservation Act—Section (SEE DIVERSITY, PAGE 7) St. James Church window detail, Lafayette Square, Baltimore, Maryland. See page 4. HERITAGE MATTERS The Cultural Resources Diversity Program seeks to expand participation of diverse communities and increase the DECEMBER 2003 number of diverse professionals in the cultural resources field. Illustration courtesy of Kerry Skarda. HERITAGE MATTERS DECEMBER 2003 devoted to non-profit and cultural NPS ACTIVITIES resources related work. The class of summer 2003 included 14 interns who worked on projects designed to introduce them to the cultural resources and his- The Cultural Resources semesters, in addition to the toric preservation field. National Diversity Internship summer. Park Service projects ranged from Program After five years, the program is collections management tasks at beginning to show promising results. Lassen Volcanic National Park and Michéle Gates Moresi Two Summer 2000 interns now Historic American Building Survey/ National Conference of State Historic work for the National Park Service: Historic American Engineering Preservation Officers one as an education specialist at Record/ Historic American Land- Harpers Ferry Center in West The 2003 summer session marked scape Survey to teacher education Virginia and the other works for the the fifth year of the Cultural development at the National Center National Center for Recreation and Resources Diversity Internship for Preservation Technology and Conservation as an oudoor recre- Program (CRDIP). Starting with only Training. Interns worked at the U.S. ation specialist. Another intern from three interns in the summer of 1999, Naval Academy in Annapolis, Mary- Summer 1998, one of the program’s the program now co-sponsors 15 to land, the Charles H. Wright Museum first, is pursuing a Ph.D. in history 20 internships a year. The continuing for African American History in and is working with a National Park support and commitment of partner Detroit, Michigan, and offices of the Service office in the Northwest on a agencies to diversify the cultural National Trust for Historic Preserva- civil rights theme study. Still other resources field has made it possible tion in Washington, DC, and in students have reported that they are for the program to offer challenging Charleston, South Carolina. working in fields such as education, internship projects each year. During the last week of the marketing, and Beginning in 2002, the program internship, all 14 interns were invited law while was able to co-sponsor intern- to Washington, DC, where they par- continuing ships during the fall and ticipated in a three-day Career to be spring Workshop. Interns were Summer 2003 interns visited the National Center for Cultural Resources, National Park Service during the Career Workshop in Washington, DC. Photo courtesy of Sue Waldron. page 2 introduced to various programs and For more information, contact Michèle Gates segregated into separate neighbor- Moresi at 202/354-2266 or e-mail: institutions beyond their summer [email protected]. hoods. In Stockton, Filipinos settled experience. Interns visited National Intern sponsors and student applicants can find in the city's Oriental district next to Park Service cultural resources up-to-date information on the website: Chinatown and Japantown and http://www.cr.nps.gov/crdi, click “Internships.” offices, met with professionals at the created their own neighborhood, National Trust for Historic Preserva- designated by its inhabitants as tion and at the Smithsonian Disappearing Little Manila, after the national cap- Institution’s National Museum of Filipino History ital of the Philippines. American History, and toured the and Little Manila Little Manila was both a residen- new City Museum of Washington, Daphne Dador tial and commercial center for its DC.The workshop closed with a National Park Service CRDIP Intern inhabitants. The six blocks were career discussion panel in which home to shops, meeting halls, and interns engaged in a dialogue with Only three buildings remain of Little restaurants that were owned and accomplished professionals. Manila, a community that once con- patronized by Filipino Americans. The Diversity Internship Program tained the largest Filipino popula- The three remaining buildings in will continue into the 2003-2004 tion in the country. Located in Little Manila, a boarded-up hotel, a academic year with four 15-week Stockton, California, Little Manila dance hall, and a former Union semester internships. Fall 2003 was home to thousands of Filipino lodge are examples of the spirit of intern sponsors are Cabrillo National immigrants until the 1970s when the community that once existed. Monument in San Diego, CA, the redevelopment forced most of its Residential hotels were homes to Roosevelt-Vanderbilt National His- inhabitants to move. Today, three Filipino migrant workers because toric Sites in Hyde Park, NY, and the run-down buildings comprise what they were not allowed to own prop- U.S. Army cultural resources office in is left of a significant Filipino Amer- erty. The dance halls represent an Fort Drum, NY. The Statue of ican enclave, but they face threats of escape for Filipino workers after a Liberty in New York City will host an being demolished to create a new long day of work and the Union intern in the spring of 2004. We Asian-themed mini-mall. lodge reminds us that Filipino farm expect to have another roster of While conducting research on laborers were among the first union exciting projects for students in the Asian heritage at National Park organizers in the country. 2004-2005 season. Service historic sites, I became In the 17th century, Filipinos The Diversity Internship Program aware of Little Manila and the were the first people of Asian works with partners in National Park efforts to preserve it. In May 2003, descent to arrive in the United States Service offices and units, other fed- the National Trust for Historic but the predominance of Filipino eral agencies, and private non-profit Preservation cited Little Manila in migration occurred during the 20th organizations to provide students of its list of 11 most endangered places. century. Today, there are about diverse backgrounds with a career The National Trust stated that Little 1.5 million Filipinos in the United exploration experiences. Internships Manila is a testimony to the impor- States, yet only one officially recog- lasting 10 weeks in the summer and tant role played by Filipino Amer- nized historic place for this commu- 15 weeks during a semester offer icans in shaping the United States. nity. Unfortunately, Little Manila is enriching work experiences that are Settlement in Little Manila began being threatened with demolition. developed by intern sponsors who in the early 1920s when Filipino For more information regarding are dedicated to providing students immigrants began to arrive in the Little Manila, visit the National Trust’s with unique learning opportunities. San Joaquin Valley. Early Filipino website at http://www.nthp.org. The continued growth and success of immigrants were primarily agricul- Daphne Dador, a senior at Catholic University of the program would not be possible tural workers who provided the America in Washington, DC, was an intern with without the cooperation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lovelock-Cave-Back-Country-Byway
    Back Country Byways . An Invitation to Discover There is an axiom among seasoned travelers advising that the best way to get to know a new place is to get off the highway and visit the back roads, the side trails and the hidden, out-of-the-way corners where the true qualities wait to be discovered. The same axiom holds true for America’s public lands, the vast reaches of our nation that are all too often seen only from the windows of speeding cars or the tiny portholes of airliners. The Bureau of Land Management, America’s largest land managing agency, is providing an exciting opportunity for more Americans to get to know their lands by getting off the main roads for leisurely trips on a series of roads and trails being dedicated as Back Country Byways. The Back Country Byways Program, an outgrowth of the national Scenic Byways Program, is designed to encourage greater use of these existing back roads through greater public awareness. The system is BUREAUREAU OOFF LANDLAND MANMANAGEMENTGEMENT expected to expand to 100 roads when completed. In Nevada, each byway has a character and beauty of its own, taking travelers through scenery that is uniquely Nevadan, into historic areas that helped shape our state and near areas that have been largely untouched by man. They can see the multiple uses of their lands and come to a greater awareness of the need for the conservation and wise use of these resources. And all this can be accomplished at little cost to the taxpayer. Because the roads are already in place, only interpretive signs and limited facilities are needed to better serve the public.
    [Show full text]
  • PICH Awardee Impact Statements
    PICH Awardee Impact Statements Background The Partnership to Improve Community Health (PICH) initiative funded 29 communities from FY2014 through FY2017 to reduce chronic disease risk factors. Awardees implemented evidence-based policy, system, and environmental interventions to improve nutrition and physical activity, reduce tobacco use and exposure, and strengthen community-clinical linkages. PICH awardee impact statements describe the short-term impacts of the PICH initiative. These impact statements were created using data from awardee Community Action Plans, awardee Progress Reports, and census data. All data were reviewed for clarity and potential duplicate reporting. Impact statements were created during two timeframes: 2016 and 2017. Each awardee has at least two impact statements; if there were additional data, additional impact statements were developed. Fort Defiance Indian Hospital Board, Inc. (Arizona) Nutrition As of September 2017, Fort Defiance Indian Hospital Board, Inc. increased access to healthy food and beverages for an estimated 59,838 Native American residents in Arizona. PICH staff supported the development of 23 farmers’ markets. To increase interest among vendors and address the misperception that farmers’ markets are for vendors who sell surplus vegetables at a low cost, PICH staff set up trainings and recruited farmers, growers, and partners to participate. Community Health Workers (CHWs) were used to find partners, organize markets, set schedules, and get community input and support. PICH staff conducted surveys at farmers’ markets and each market included a cultural component coupled with a public health component consisting of healthy living messages, eating/eating healthy, and taking care of oneself. They also invited local health related resources to participate and they assisted with outreach, public information, educations, and demonstrations.
    [Show full text]
  • American Indian Law Journal
    American Indian Law Journal Volume III, Issue II • Spring 2015 “The Spirit of Justice” by Artist Terrance Guardipee Supported by the Center for Indian Law & Policy SPIRIT OF JUSTICE Terrence Guardipee and Catherine Black Horse donated this original work of art to the Center for Indian Law and Policy in November 2012 in appreciation for the work the Center engages in on behalf of Indian and Native peoples throughout the United States, including educating and training a new generation of lawyers to carry on the struggle for justice. The piece was created by Mr. Guardipee, who is from the Blackfeet Tribe in Montana and is known all over the country and internationally for his amazing ledger map collage paintings and other works of art. He was among the very first artists to revive the ledger art tradition and in the process has made it into his own map collage concept. These works of art incorporate traditional Blackfeet images into Mr. Guardipee’s contemporary form of ledger art. He attended the Institute of American Indian Arts in Sante Fe, New Mexico. His work has won top awards at the Santa Fe Market, the Heard Museum Indian Market, and the Autrey Museum Intertribal Market Place. He also has been featured a featured artists at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of the American Indian in Washington, D.C., along with the Museum of Natural History in Hanover, Germany, and the Hood Museum at Dartmouth College. American Indian Law Journal Editorial Board 2014-2015 Editor-in-Chief Jocelyn McCurtain Managing Editor Callie Tift Content Editor Executive Editor Jillian Held Nancy Mendez Articles Editors Writing Competition Chair Events Coordinator Jessica Buckelew Nick Major Leticia Hernandez Jonathan Litner 2L Staffers Paul Barrera - Jessica Barry J.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 82, No. 10/Tuesday, January 17, 2017
    Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 17, 2017 / Notices 4915 Applicant: Richard Killion, Lot Q–3, subdivision of the unsubdivided their government-to-government Breckenridge, TX; PRT–06382C remainder of Tract Q, U.S. Survey 2327, relationship with the United States as according to the plat thereof filed December well as the responsibilities, powers, Brenda Tapia, 7, 1988, as plat No. 88–39, Ketchikan limitations, and obligations of such Recording District, State of Alaska, Program Analyst/Data Administrator, Branch Tribes. We have continued the practice of Permits, Division of Management containing 1.08 acres. Authority. of listing the Alaska Native entities Dated: January 10, 2017. separately solely for the purpose of [FR Doc. 2017–00755 Filed 1–13–17; 8:45 am] Lawrence S. Roberts, facilitating identification of them and BILLING CODE 4333–15–P Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian reference to them given the large Affairs. number of complex Native names. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR [FR Doc. 2017–00872 Filed 1–13–17; 8:45 am] Dated: January 10, 2017. BILLING CODE 4337–15–P Lawrence S. Roberts, Bureau of Indian Affairs Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian [178A2100DD/AAKC001030/ DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Affairs. A0A501010.999900253G] Indian Tribal Entities Within the Bureau of Indian Affairs Land Acquisitions; Craig Tribal Contiguous 48 States Recognized and Association, Craig, Alaska [178A2100DD/AAKC001030/ Eligible To Receive Services From the A0A501010.999900 253G] United States Bureau of Indian Affairs AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Absentee-Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Indian Entities Recognized and Eligible Interior. Oklahoma To Receive Services From the United ACTION: Notice of final agency Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians determination.
    [Show full text]
  • Federally Recognized Indian Tribes
    Appendix C: Federally Recognized Indian Tribes The following tribal entities within the contiguous 48 states are recognized and eligible to receive services from the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs. For further information contact Bureau of Indian Affairs, Division of Tribal Government Services, 1849 C Street N.W., Washington, DC 20240; Telephone number (202) 208-7445.1 Figure C.1 shows the location of the Federally Recognized Tribes. 1. Absentee-Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma 2. Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians of the Agua Caliente Indian Reservation, California 3. Ak Chin Indian Community of Papago Indians of the Maricopa, Ak Chin Reservation, Arizona 4. Alabama and Coushatta Tribes of Texas 5. Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town of the Creek Nation of Oklahoma 6. Alturas Rancheria of Pit River Indians of California 7. Apache Tribe of Oklahoma 8. Arapahoe Tribe of the Wind River Reservation, Wyoming 9. Aroostook Band of Micmac Indians of Maine 10. Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation, Montana 11. Augustine Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians of the Augustine Reservation, California 12. Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians of the Bad River Reservation, Wisconsin 13. Bay Mills Indian Community of the Sault Ste. Marie Band of Chippewa Indians Bay Mills. Reservation, Michigan 14. Berry Creek Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California 15. Big Lagoon Rancheria of Smith River Indians of California 1Federal Register, Vol. 61, No. 220, November 13, 1996. C–1 Figure C.1.—Locations of Federally Recognized Indian Tribes and Alaska Native Corporations. C–2 16.
    [Show full text]
  • The Trajectory of Indian Country in California: Rancherias, Villages, Pueblos, Missions, Ranchos, Reservations, Colonies, and Rancherias
    Tulsa Law Review Volume 44 Issue 2 60 Years after the Enactment of the Indian Country Statute - What Was, What Is, and What Should Be Winter 2008 The Trajectory of Indian Country in California: Rancherias, Villages, Pueblos, Missions, Ranchos, Reservations, Colonies, and Rancherias William Wood Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation William Wood, The Trajectory of Indian Country in California: Rancherias, Villages, Pueblos, Missions, Ranchos, Reservations, Colonies, and Rancherias, 44 Tulsa L. Rev. 317 (2013). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr/vol44/iss2/1 This Native American Symposia Articles is brought to you for free and open access by TU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Tulsa Law Review by an authorized editor of TU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Wood: The Trajectory of Indian Country in California: Rancherias, Villa THE TRAJECTORY OF INDIAN COUNTRY IN CALIFORNIA: RANCHERIAS, VILLAGES, PUEBLOS, MISSIONS, RANCHOS, RESERVATIONS, COLONIES, AND RANCHERIAS William Wood* 1. INTRODUCTION This article examines the path, or trajectory,1 of Indian country in California. More precisely, it explores the origin and historical development over the last three centuries of a legal principle and practice under which a particular, protected status has been extended to land areas belonging to and occupied by indigenous peoples in what is now California. The examination shows that ever since the Spanish first established a continuing presence in California in 1769, the governing colonial regime has accorded Indian lands such status.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Nations Law Update
    Indian Nations Law Update September 2009 ■ Vol 4, Issue 9 Federal Appellate Court Rejects State Challenge to Tribe’s Off-Reservation Clean Air Act Authority In State of Michigan v. Environmental Protection Agency and Forest County Potawatomi Community, 2009 WL 2870619 (7th Cir.), the Forest County Potawatomi Community (“Tribe”) had obtained a fi nal ruling from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designating the Tribe’s reservation in Forest County, Wisconsin, as “Class I” for purposes of the Clean Air Act, triggering stricter air quality controls on air pollution in and around the reservation, extending into the State of Michigan. The Tribe negotiated a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Wisconsin governing the exercise of the Brian L. Pierson Tribe’s Class I authority relative to off-reservation emissions. Michigan, by contrast, sued the EPA and (414) 287-9456 the Tribe, challenging the EPA’s Class I redesignation. The district court upheld EPA’s decision and the [email protected] Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals affi rmed, holding that (1) Michigan had no standing to challenge the Tribe’s Class I status based on the alleged procedural defect that a Tribal Implementation Plan had not been adopted, (2) EPA’s imposition of standard Class I emission restrictions on Michigan, stricter than those negotiated by Wisconsin under the MOU, was not retaliation from Michigan’s choice to pursue litigation, (3) the parens patriae doctrine pursuant to which states may sue to protect its citizens does not apply to suits against the United States challenging federal laws, and (4) Michigan’s purported uncertainty regarding its compliance obligations was unfounded.
    [Show full text]
  • Pueblos Amicus Brief
    Case: 07-9506 Document: 01018322618 Date Filed: 12/01/2009 Page: 1 No. 07-9506 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT HYDRO RESOURCES, INC., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Respondent, and NAVAJO NATION, Intervenor-Respondent. REHEARING EN BANC OF PETITION FOR REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY BRIEF OF PUEBLOS OF SANTA CLARA, SANDIA, ISLETA AND ZIA AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENT, URGING AFFIRMANCE ROTHSTEIN, DONATELLI, HUGHES, DAHLSTROM, SCHOENBURG & BIENVENU, LLP Richard W. Hughes Post Office Box 8180 Santa Fe, New Mexico 87504-8180 (505) 988-8004 Attorneys for Amicus Pueblo of Santa Clara SONOSKY, CHAMBERS, SACHSE, MIELKE & BROWNELL David C. Mielke 500 Marquette Ave. NW, #1310 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102-5335 (505) 247-0147 Attorneys for Amici Pueblos of Sandia, Isleta and Zia December 1, 2009 Case: 07-9506 Document: 01018322618 Date Filed: 12/01/2009 Page: 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ..........................................ii IDENTITY AND INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE ........................1 ARGUMENT ......................................................3 I. A PROPER UNDERSTANDING OF THE “DEPENDENT INDIAN COMMUNITY” LANGUAGE OF 18 U.S.C. § 1151(b) REQUIRES AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES UNDERLYING UNITED STATES V. SANDOVAL, AND THE DISTINCTIVE HISTORY OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND THE PUEBLO INDIANS UP TO THE DATE OF THAT CASE. ...........3 A. Introduction ..........................................3 B. Historical Background .................................4 C. The Sandoval Decision and the “Dependent Indian Community” Concept. .........................10 D. The Dependent Indian Community as the “Community of Reference.” .....................................15 E. The “Public Domain Navajos.” ..........................17 F. The Status of Fee Land Within Dependent Indian Communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Contrary Jurisprudence: Tribal Interests in Navigable Waterways Before and After Montana V
    Washington Law Review Volume 56 Number 4 11-1-1981 Contrary Jurisprudence: Tribal Interests in Navigable Waterways Before and After Montana v. United States Russel Lawrence Barsh James Youngblood Henderson Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr Part of the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons, and the Water Law Commons Recommended Citation Russel L. Barsh & James Y. Henderson, Contrary Jurisprudence: Tribal Interests in Navigable Waterways Before and After Montana v. United States, 56 Wash. L. Rev. 627 (1981). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr/vol56/iss4/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at UW Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington Law Review by an authorized editor of UW Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CONTRARY JURISPRUDENCE: TRIBAL INTERESTS IN NAVIGABLE WATERWAYS BEFORE AND AFTER MONTANA V. UNITED STATES Russel Lawrence Barsh* James Youngblood Henderson** In 1974 the Crow Tribal Council enacted a resolution restricting reser- vation hunting and fishing to tribal members. No distinction was made between lands owned by the tribe or its members and the nearly thirty percent of the reservation area held in fee simple by non-members and the State of Montana. The resolution also purported to govern the Big Horn River, the bed of which the tribe claimed under its 1868 treaty with the United States. ' The State of Montana refused to recognize the tribe's ju- risdiction to enact and enforce this restriction and continued to license non-member hunting and fishing within the reservation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dependent Indian Community Concept and Tribal/Tribal Member Immunity from State Taxation
    Volume 27 Issue 2 Spring 1997 Spring 1997 Indian Country: The Dependent Indian Community Concept and Tribal/Tribal Member Immunity from State Taxation Paul W. Shagen Recommended Citation Paul W. Shagen, Indian Country: The Dependent Indian Community Concept and Tribal/Tribal Member Immunity from State Taxation, 27 N.M. L. Rev. 421 (1997). Available at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmlr/vol27/iss2/5 This Notes and Comments is brought to you for free and open access by The University of New Mexico School of Law. For more information, please visit the New Mexico Law Review website: www.lawschool.unm.edu/nmlr INDIAN COUNTRY: THE DEPENDENT INDIAN COMMUNITY CONCEPT AND TRIBAL/TRIBAL MEMBER IMMUNITY FROM STATE TAXATION I. INTRODUCTION This Comment analyzes various judicial tests for determining whether a "dependent Indian community" exists under the federal Indian country statute, 18 U.S.C. section 1151 (1994); suggests an alternative test; and considers the implications of each test for tribal and tribal member immunity from state taxation. The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly addressed the question of state authority to tax Indian tribes and tribal members. In several decisions, the Court has articulated the principle that tribal and tribal member immunity from state taxation is limited by the geographic boundaries of a tribe's territory.' For example, in McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax Commission,2 the Court held that a state may not tax an Indian living on a reservation for income earned exclusively on the reservation, unless Congress authorizes such taxation. Since McClanahan, the Supreme Court has extended the presumption against state taxation beyond reservation boundaries to Indian country.
    [Show full text]
  • FRANKLIN SCHOOL Other Name/Site Number: Franklin, Benjamin, Schoolhouse
    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NFS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMBNo. 1024-0018 FRANKLIN SCHOOL Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service_________________________________ National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: FRANKLIN SCHOOL Other Name/Site Number: Franklin, Benjamin, Schoolhouse 2. LOCATION Street & Number: 925 13th Street, NW Not for publication: N/A City/Town: Washington Vicinity: N/A State: B.C. County: N/A Code: 001 Zip Code: 20005 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private: __ Building(s): X Public-Local: __ District: __ Public-State: X Site: __ Public-Federal: Structure: __ Object: __ Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 1 __ buildings sites structures objects Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 1 Name of Related Multiple Property Listing: N/A NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 FRANKLIN SCHOOL Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service_____________________________________National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this __ nomination __ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ___ meets __ does not meet the National Register Criteria. Signature of Certifying Official Date State or Federal Agency and Bureau In my opinion, the property __ meets __ does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • AAHP Brochure
    THE LARGEST PIECES IN THE SMITHSONIAN COLLECTION The buildings of the Smithsonian Institution frame the National Mall. They not only contain impres- sive collections, but serve themselves as icons of great cultural significance. Their forms illustrate the changing styles and sensibilities of America as an evolving nation. Each one represents a specific time in history: the turreted Castle, the majestically domed Natural History Museum, the sky-reflecting Air and Space Museum and the golden, undulating American Indian Museum. Deemed to have exceptional value to the nation, most of these structures are National Historic Landmarks or are included on the National Register of Historic Places, the official roster of our nation’s historic sites. This guide lists first the nine Smithsonian buildings that sit on the National Mall and then five others that lie outside its boundaries. We invite you to explore these treasures and experience our collective history through the largest pieces in the Smithsonian’s collection: its buildings. THE SMITHSONIAN CASTLE Architect: James Renwick Jr. Completion Date: 1855 Style: Medieval Revival Fun Fact: James Smithson, founder of the Smithsonian, is interred in a crypt here. He is the only known person laid to rest on the Mall. The red sandstone Smithsonian Building, commonly called The Castle, was the first home of the fledgling Institution. Robert Dale Owen, chairman of the building committee, advocated a large and showy structure. The future success of the Institution, he believed, depended upon a building that could make “conspicuous the work of the organization.” He argued that a medieval architec- tural style would meet his criteria, with its “lofty charac- ter” and “aspiring lines.” Eight unique, crenellated towers of this richly colored building stand etched against the changing sky.
    [Show full text]