Chapter5-Projects-Funding FINAL

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter5-Projects-Funding FINAL CONNECTIONS 2040: The Duluth - Superior Long Range Transportaon Plan 5. Projects & Funding This secon of CONNECTIONS 2040 explains how transportaon PY``J`B `3 F`3J`B T`J` PU7- J` DYG- improvements are funded in Duluth- S7J PB7 5-2 Superior, and more specifically how federal funding gets applied to projects Planning Transportaon Projects for 25 Years .................................. 5-2 within the MIC area. This secon Defining Project Types ...................................................................... 5-4 describes how the area’s long-range list Idenfying Projects based on Investment Priories ......................... 5-5 of transportaon improvement projects was developed, and how those projects FJ``-JY A7_7` PB7 5-7 were then assessed for air quality conformity and community impacts. Forecasng Future Revenues ........................................................... 5-7 Forecasng System-level Needs ....................................................... 5-8 Comparing CONNECTIONS 2040 Projects to Forecasted Revenue . 5-11 LJ A T`J` PU7-: 2015-2040 PB7 5-12 MnDOT District 1 project List .......................................................... 5-13 St. Louis County Project List ............................................................ 5-15 City of Duluth Project List ............................................................... 5-17 City of Hermantown Project List ..................................................... 5-20 WisDOT NW Region Project List ..................................................... 5-21 Douglas County Project List ............................................................ 5-23 City of Superior Project List ............................................................ 5-24 Duluth Transit Authority (DTA) Project List .................................... 5-26 Projects idenfied as “Unfunded Needs” ....................................... 5-28 Projects Idenfied as “For Study” .................................................. 5-30 OG7 PU7- A7_7` PB7 5-31 Environmental Jusce & Community Impact Assessment .............. 5-31 Historical Preservaon & Environmentally Sensive Areas Assessments ................................................................................... 5-33 5-1 PY``J`B `3 F`3J`B T`J` PU7- J` DYG-S7J Because building and maintaining transportation infrastructure is expensive and typically takes years of planning and engineering before construction can begin, transportation projects require programming, which is the process of lining up federal, state, and local funding sources for such projects. This chapter of Connecons 2040 idenfies future transportaon projects that are being planned for in the Duluth-Superior area over the next 25 years. It also provides an esmaon of the funding that will be available to finance those projects. Such esmates help members of the MIC and its local and regional transportaon partners determine the financial feasibility of planned projects. As explained in Chapter 2, the development and implementaon of Connecons 2040 is guided by a series of federal laws and regulaons. Among these are 23 U.S.C 134(i)(2)(C) and 49 U.S.C 5303(f)(B), which require metropolitan transportaon plans to be fiscally constrained. As such, this chapter contains the following: • Financial assessment showing reasonably expected funding sources and demonstrating fiscal constraint (p. 5-7) • 25-year list of transportation improvements, organized by jurisdiction (p. 5-12) • Community impact assessment of planned projects (p. 5-31) • Historical preservation and environmentally sensitive areas assessment of planned projects (p. 5-33) Planning Transportaon Projects for 25 Years The following pages contain future transportaon projects that were idenfied through the development of CONNECTIONS 2040. The selecon of these projects was based in part on the various transportaon goals and objecves for the area (Chapter 1), the federal and state policies guiding this plan (Chapter 2), the various trends and projecons for the area (Chapter 3), and the current performance of the exisng transportaon system (Chapter 4). The projects that are listed on the following pages are organized according to the various transportaon jurisdicons in the area. The 5-2 project ID numbers listed in the first column correspond with Using the Connecons 2040 Interacve those labeled in an interacve project map that can be accessed Project Map: at: www.dsmic.org/lrtp (see Figure 5.1 below and the informaon in sidebar at right). The locaons of the projects are also Projects idenfied in this long range plan can illustrated in the Map 5.1 and Map 5.2 found on pages 5-32 and be viewed with an interacve map . The map 5-34. provides for the ability to adjust the scale to improve viewing, as well as retrieve details Figure 5.1: Connecons 2040 interacve web map about specific projects. Projects are organized by the meframe in which they’re planned to implemented. All projects belonging to a meframe can be added or removed from the map using the menu at the le of the map. The implementaon of the projects idenfied in CONNECTIONS Menu of map layers 2040 are being planned according to one of three meframes: short-range (2015-2019), mid-range (2020-2024), and long-range (2025-2040). These meframes represent the following Using the cursor arrow to select individual disncons: projects and open a dialogue showing details about project costs, meframe, and the Short-Range Projects (2015-2019) responsible jurisdicon. Projects already planned and being programmed in either the Duluth Area or Superior Area Transportaon Improvement Projects (TIPs). These documents idenfy federal, state, and local funding sources and amounts to be applied to the projects listed with in them. Mid-Range Projects (2020-2024) Projects idenfied by jurisdicons and already part of their ten- year capital improvement programs. Local funding sources have already been idenfied for many of these projects. Click on projects in the map to get Long-Range Projects (2025-2040) details about the individual projects. Projects that jurisdicons ancipate doing beyond 20 years out, but are currently not part of any capital improvement program. Federal, state, and local funding sources have not yet been idenfied for these projects, though such funding is reasonably expected to be available for them. 5-3 Defining Project Types For the purposes of this plan, the projects idenfied have been Connecons 2040 Project Types: categorized according to the descriptors listed at right. This is useful For the purposes of tracking and analysis, for a number of reasons, but also provides for a quick glimpse of the projects included in this plan have been area’s investment priories. Figure 5.2, for instance, shows how the classified as one of the following: number of projects categorized as either “Reconstrucon” or “Preservaon” represent 69% of the projects listed in the plan. This Construcon is in stark contrast to the 5% of the projects idenfied as either Projects resulng new infrastructure, such as “Construcon” or “Enhancements”. This is, in large part, a reflecon the building of new facilies or addional of the financial challenges being projected for the transportaon lane capacity along exisng roadways. system. Figure 5.3 shows that projects aimed at merely maintaining exisng highway infrastructure and transit operaons accounts for Enhancement 97% of the $1.5 billion esmated total cost for all projects that can Elements being added to an exisng facility be funded with future revenues that can be reasonably ancipated. that enhance the comfort, safety, or accessibility of that facility. Figure 5.2: Number of planned projects by type (2010-2035) Reconstrucon Projects that rebuild or rehab exisng facilies without adding more capacity or change roadway alignment. Preservaon Projects that retain or restore the condion of exisng facilies through repaving or similar acvies. Operaons & Maintenance Maintenance efforts or spot improvements aimed at maintaining exisng levels of service or improving the efficiency and safety of exisng facilies without adding capacity. Vehicle Replacements The purchase of new transit vehicles to replace Figure 5.3: Total costs of planned projects by type (2010-2035) older vehicles for the purpose of maintaining service quality and managing ongoing maintenance costs. Unfunded Need Needs that jurisdicons ancipate having to address within the next 25 years but would not be able to fund with the levels of revenue that can reasonably be expected to be available over that period of me. For Study A need or potenal need that has been idenfied, but appropriate treatments have not yet been determined. 5-4 Idenfying Projects based on Investment Priories As explained in Chapter 3, populaon and employment projecons suggest a level of growth over the next 25 years that will produce capacity challenges in some locaons throughout the roadway network. Over this same period, however, the cost of maintaining Duluth-Superior’s exisng transportaon infrastructure is expected to more than double due to the rising cost of construcon materials and the effects of inflaon. Because of this, reconstrucon and preservaon projects were idenfied early on in the CONNECTIONS 2040 planning process as high priories for future transportaon investments in the area. Project Selecon The projects included in this plan were idenfied in coordinaon with the various transportaon jurisdicons in the area. Staff from the MIC engaged officials and representaves of the area’s various municipalies and jurisdicons by reporng on baseline data
Recommended publications
  • District 1 / Northeastern Minnesota 1 Industry Clusters
    Manufacturers’ Perspectives on Minnesota’s Transportation System District 1/Northeastern Minnesota June 2017 Cover photo credits: Front cover: Large truck, ship/lighthouse, highway and snow plow (inside) - David Gonzalez, MnDOT Wind turbine blade shipment at Duluth Port - Robert Welton, courtesy of Duluth Seaway Port Authority Back cover: Congested traffic (inside) and Duluth Port - David Gonzalez, MnDOT Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................5 Purpose and Methodology .....................................................................................................................................5 Results .....................................................................................................................................................................5 Findings ...................................................................................................................................................................6 District 1 Business Priorities ...............................................................................................................................7 Characteristics that Affect the Transportation System ......................................................................................7 Recommended Next Steps ......................................................................................................................................7 MnDOT District
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-Chamber-Directory Web.Pdf
    Your Real Estate Experts! Dick Wenaas Greg Kamp Tommy Jess Mary Alysa JoLynn Kathy David Pam Archer Bellefeuille Binsfield Bjorklund Cooper Cortes Corbin Dahlberg Deb Ginger Cathy Sue Candi Melissa Brenda Mark Dreawves Eckman Ehret Erickson Fabre Fahlin Gregorich Honer Doug Tom Sharon Shaina Anissa Peter Kriss Kman Little McCauley Nickila Priley Rozumalski Sutherland Blythe Jonathan Patry Jeanne Ron Claude Chris Thill Thornton Truman Tondryk Tondryk Wenaas Wilk Duluth (218) 728-5161 - Cloquet (218) 879-1211 - Superior (715) 394-6671 • www.cbeastwestrealty.com vi 2020 Duluth Area Chamber of Commerce x Welcome to Our Beloved Community Welcome .................................. 1 uluth is a vibrant community filled with remarkable people and places. We enjoy Duluth History.......................... 2 an extraordinary city that supports, cares for and creates opportunities for all Duluth at a Glance .................. 5 Dof our citizens. If you have arrived on our shores, we are happy to have you join us. If you are Housing .................................... 6 considering making the Duluth area your home or place of business, wait no longer. Economy ................................ 10 We are ready to help you settle in for a lifetime. Building Our City .................... 12 This is one of the most beautiful places you are ever going to experience. We are ready to show it off, and that is why our Chamber is making this Community Guide available Education ............................... 16 to you. We believe the more you know about our Shining City on the Hill, the more Financial ................................ 20 you will be drawn to it. You will enjoy this big city with a small-town personality – Government ........................... 26 a rugged outpost with a cosmopolitan flair.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Superior Profile
    Section 3: City of Superior Profile CITY OF SUPERIOR PROFILE Overview The City of Superior, the county seat of Douglas County, is located in the northwest portion of Wisconsin on the western shore of Lake Superior, the largest freshwater lake in the world by surface area. The City is bounded primarily by three Lake Superior bays; Allouez Bay, Superior Bay and the St. Louis Bay. In addition, the city is bordered by the St. Louis River with its many inlets and bays, the Nemadji River, Pokegama River and numerous smaller continuous and intermittent streams. The City is approximately 42 square miles. Map 3.1: Hazard Mitigation Planning Area 3-1 City of Superior Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Section 3: City of Superior Profile Population & Demographics The City of Superior is home to 27,368 residents, according to the 2000 U.S. Census Bureau. The population density is 741 persons per square mile and is depicted in Map 3.2. Map 3.2: City of Superior Population Density by Census Block Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2000 Table 3.1 City of Superior Year 2000 Census Population Special Needs Population Total Population Elderly (65 & over) Individuals below 2000 Census poverty level Superior 27,368 4114 (15%) 3507 (13%) Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2000 Population estimates from 1970 to 2009 and population projections from 2010 to 2030 are listed in Table 3.2 and in Figure 3.11 respectively, as provided by the U.S. Census Bureau and the Wisconsin Demographic Service Center. Over the past four decades (1970-2000) the population has decreased but the population projections (2010-2030) show a more stable population trend.
    [Show full text]
  • BMO Harris Bank (With Value-Add Opportunity Via Vacancy) 1425 Tower Ave, Superior, WI, 54880 BMO Harris Bank | Superior, WI Table of Contents
    Net Lease Investment Offering BMO Harris Bank (With Value-Add Opportunity Via Vacancy) 1425 Tower Ave, Superior, WI, 54880 BMO Harris Bank | Superior, WI Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Offering Summary Executive Summary ................................................................... 1 Investment Highlights ............................................................. 2 Property Overview ...................................................................... 3 Building Breakdown .................................................................4 Proforma Analysis ....................................................................... 5 Location Overview Photographs ...................................................................................6 Aerial .................................................................................................... 7 Site Plan .............................................................................................8 Floor Plan ..........................................................................................9 Map .....................................................................................................10 Market Overview Market Overview ..........................................................................11 Demographics .............................................................................12 Tenant Summary Tenant Profile ................................................................................13 | 2 | www.bouldergroup.com | Confidential Offering Memorandum
    [Show full text]
  • Collapse of I-35W Highway Bridge Minneapolis, Minnesota August 1, 2007
    Collapse of I-35W Highway Bridge Minneapolis, Minnesota August 1, 2007 highwayACCIDENT REPORT NTSB/HAR-08/03 National PB2008-916203 Transportation Safety Board NTSB/HAR-08/03 PB2008-916203 Notation 7975C November 14, 2008 Highway Accident Report Collapse of I-35W Highway Bridge Minneapolis, Minnesota August 1, 2007 National Transportation Safety Board 490 L’Enfant Plaza, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20594 National Transportation Safety Board. 2008. Collapse of I-35W Highway Bridge, Minneapolis, Minnesota, August 1, 2007. Highway Accident Report NTSB/HAR-08/03. Washington, DC. Abstract: About 6:05 p.m. central daylight time on Wednesday, August 1, 2007, the eight-lane, 1,907-foot-long I-35W highway bridge over the Mississippi River in Minneapolis, Minnesota, experienced a catastrophic failure in the main span of the deck truss. As a result, 1,000 feet of the deck truss collapsed, with about 456 feet of the main span falling 108 feet into the 15-foot-deep river. A total of 111 vehicles were on the portion of the bridge that collapsed. Of these, 17 were recovered from the water. As a result of the bridge collapse, 13 people died, and 145 people were injured. On the day of the collapse, roadway work was underway on the I-35W bridge, and four of the eight travel lanes (two outside lanes northbound and two inside lanes southbound) were closed to traffic. In the early afternoon, construction equipment and construction aggregates (sand and gravel for making concrete) were delivered and positioned in the two closed inside southbound lanes. The equipment and aggregates, which were being staged for a concrete pour of the southbound lanes that was to begin about 7:00 p.m., were positioned toward the south end of the center section of the deck truss portion of the bridge and were in place by about 2:30 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • MIC Area Thoroughfare Plan
    i ii MIC Area Thoroughfare Plan March 2001 This study was funded through the Duluth-Superior Metropolitan Interstate Committee with funding from the: Federal Highway Administration Minnesota Department of Transportation Wisconsin Department of Transportation Arrowhead Regional Development Commission Northwest Regional Planning Commission Copies of this plan are available from the Duluth-Superior Metropolitan Interstate Committee 221 West First Street, Duluth, MN 55802 (218) 529-7541 Prepared by the Duluth-Superior Metropolitan Interstate Committee Duluth-Superior urban area communities cooperating in planning and development through a joint venture of the Arrowhead Regional Development Commission and the Northwest Regional Planning Commission iii iv Duluth-Superior Metropolitan Interstate Committee Member and Staff Listing March 2001 Metropolitan Interstate Committee: NWRPC / MIC Staff: David Allen, City of Hermantown Sheldon Johnson, MIC Deputy Director Nick Baker, Douglas County Board Tom Brekke, St. Louis County Suburban Townships Transportation Advisory Committee: Russell Carlson, Douglas County Board John Allen, WisDOT Mike Conlan, City of Duluth Jim Benning, City of Duluth David Conley, Douglas County Board Jim Foldesi, St. Louis County Bill Eckman, Douglas County Board John Foschi, City of Proctor Earl Elde, St. Louis County Suburban Paul Halverson, Douglas County Townships Bryn Jacobson, Bike/Pedestrian Representative Edward Erickson, Superior City Council Dennis Jensen, Duluth Transit Authority Lynn Fena, Duluth City Council Dennis
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 86 Wednesday, No. 35 February 24, 2021 Pages 11091–11386
    Vol. 86 Wednesday, No. 35 February 24, 2021 Pages 11091–11386 OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL REGISTER VerDate Sep 11 2014 17:30 Feb 23, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\24FEWS.LOC 24FEWS khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with FR-1WS II Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 24, 2021 The FEDERAL REGISTER (ISSN 0097–6326) is published daily, SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES Monday through Friday, except official holidays, by the Office PUBLIC of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, under the Federal Register Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) Subscriptions: and the regulations of the Administrative Committee of the Federal Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Register (1 CFR Ch. I). The Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Assistance with public subscriptions 202–512–1806 Government Publishing Office, is the exclusive distributor of the official edition. Periodicals postage is paid at Washington, DC. General online information 202–512–1530; 1–888–293–6498 Single copies/back copies: The FEDERAL REGISTER provides a uniform system for making available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and Assistance with public single copies 1–866–512–1800 Executive Orders, Federal agency documents having general (Toll-Free) applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published FEDERAL AGENCIES by act of Congress, and other Federal agency documents of public Subscriptions: interest. Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions: Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Federal Register the day before they are published, unless the Email [email protected] issuing agency requests earlier filing.
    [Show full text]
  • Seiche Events from Coastal Hazards
    Section 5: Coastal Hazards COASTAL HAZARDS Location The City of Superior lies at the westernmost tip of Lake Superior, bordered by St. Louis Bay to the northwest, Superior Bay to the northeast, Allouez Bay to the southeast and the St. Louis River estuary in the southwest. The City is sheltered from Lake Superior by Minnesota and Wisconsin Points, natural sand bars spanning over 9 miles, separating Lake Superior from the bays and the City. The Superior Entry is a 500-foot open water gap between Wisconsin and Minnesota points used by recreational boating and shipping traffic accessing Superior Bay. Hazard Profile Coastal hazards affecting the City of Superior include high and low lake levels, storm surges, seiche events, wave run-up, wave set-up and coastal flooding as a result of one or more of the above. Several factors can contribute to coastal flood risk. Susceptibility is influenced by shore topography, landmasses, water depth and direction of event. The rivers and bays associated with the City are influenced by lake level fluctuations, storm surges and wave and seiche energy. The red clay soils and sandy shorelines are prone to erosion as direct and indirect effects of coastal water hazards. Despite potentially high wave and seiche energies from Lake Superior, the City of Superior remains relatively sheltered from disturbance due to the natural barrier of Minnesota and Wisconsin points. Wave and seiche events affecting the City tend not to pose a significant threat to life and property contained within the harbor. The City is a prime target for the natural phenomenon of “lake effect” snowstorms.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Superior Profile
    Section 3: City of Superior Profile CITY OF SUPERIOR PROFILE Overview The City of Superior, the county seat of Douglas County, is located in the northwest portion of Wisconsin on the western shore of Lake Superior, the largest freshwater lake in the world by surface area. The City is bounded primarily by three Lake Superior bays; Allouez Bay, Superior Bay and St. Louis Bay. In addition, the City is bordered by the St. Louis River with its many inlets and bays, the Nemadji River, Pokegama River and numerous smaller continuous and intermittent streams. The City is approximately 42 square miles. Map 3.1: Hazard Mitigation Planning Area 3-1 City of Superior Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Section 3: City of Superior Profile Population & Demographics The City of Superior is home to 27,368 residents, according to the 2000 U.S. Census Bureau. The population density is 741 persons per square mile and is depicted in Map 3.2. Map 3.2: City of Superior Population Density by Census Block Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2000 Table 3.1 City of Superior Census Population, 2000 Census Special Needs Population Total Population Elderly (65 & over) Individuals below poverty level City of Superior 27,368 4,114 (15%) 3,507 (13%) Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2000 Population estimates from 1970 to 2009 and population projections from 2010 to 2030 are listed in Table 3.2 and in Figure 3.11, as provided by the U.S. Census Bureau and the Wisconsin Demographic Service Center. Over the past four decades (1970-2000) the population has decreased but the population projections (2010-2030) show a more stable population trend.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Background
    DRAFT PURPOSE AND NEED STATEMENT 1 Background The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) and the Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT) have initiated the planning for improvements to the Blatnik bridge. See Figure 1 for project location. MnDOT will act as the lead agency for the development, design and construction of the Blatnik Bridge (I-535) per the border bridge cooperative agreement with WisDOT. FHWA is the lead federal agency responsible for approval of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process and documentation for this project. The environmental processes and requirements of the state of Minnesota will be followed; however, Wisconsin state laws and regulations, and additional environmental processes apply to project activities proposed within the state of Wisconsin. MnDOT and WisDOT are working cooperatively in the planning, design and decision-making for this project as they have been for the inspection and maintenance of the structure. All studies and reports completed for the bridge are coordinate between both agencies. Both DOT’s include the Blatnik bridge in their respective plans for major bridge improvements starting in 2028. This agreement requires a 50/50 cost share for all border bridges. The John A. Blatnik Bridge (Minnesota Bridge 9030, Wisconsin Bridge B-16-5, hereafter called the Blatnik Bridge) on Interstate 535 (I-535) connects the two communities of Duluth, Minnesota, and Superior, Wisconsin over the St. Louis Bay. It is one of two bridges that connect the two communities (collectively called the Twin Ports) over the waterway. The other is the Richard I. Bong Memorial Bridge on U.S. Route 2 (US 2) to the southwest (hereafter called the Bong Bridge).
    [Show full text]
  • AOC”) As a "Geographic Area Designated by the U.S
    STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT 21ST AVENUE WEST AQUATIC HABITAT RESTORATION PROJECT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW DULUTH, ST. LOUIS COUNTY, MINNESOTA AND ORDER Pursuant to Minn. ch. 4410, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (“MPCA”) staff prepared and distributed an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (“EAW”) for the proposed 21st Avenue West Aquatic Habitat Restoration project (“Project”) in Duluth, Minnesota. The MPCA hereby makes the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order (“FOF”) based on: the MPCA staff environmental review; the EAW; information from an earlier EAW by the city of Duluth; the Pilot Project (discussed below); comments and information received during the comment period; and other information in the record of the MPCA. FINDINGS OF FACT Parties 1. The MPCA is the Project proposer. The MPCA is also the governmental agency responsible for preparing the EAW for this Project. These FOF refer to the MPCA as the Project “Proposer” when the EAW discusses the MPCA in its role as proposer. The EAW uses “MPCA” when referring to the MPCA in its role as the agency responsible for the environmental review of this Project. 2. The United States Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”) will serve as the prime contractor for the Proposer. The Corps will transport dredge material on barges to the Project site and place the material into the water at locations specified by the Proposer. In these FOF, “Proposer” also includes all actions taken by the Corps in its capacity as Proposer’s contactor.
    [Show full text]
  • Three-Dimensional Visualization Maps of Suspended-Sediment
    Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Three-Dimensional Visualization Maps of Suspended- Sediment Concentrations during Placement of Dredged Material in 21st Avenue West Channel Embayment, Duluth-Superior Harbor, Duluth, Minnesota, 2015 Explanation 240 180 90 45 in milligramps per liter 22 8 Suspended-sediment concentration, End of dredge material discharge pipe Scientific Investigations Report 2016–5086 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover illustration: Modified version of figure 13 from this report and 21st Avenue West Channel Embayment of the Duluth-Superior Harbor, Duluth, Minnesota, on September 4, 2015 (photograph provided by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). Three-Dimensional Visualization Maps of Suspended-Sediment Concentrations during Placement of Dredged Material in 21st Avenue West Channel Embayment, Duluth-Superior Harbor, Duluth, Minnesota, 2015 By Joel T. Groten, Christopher A. Ellison, and Mollie H. Mahoney Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Scientific Investigations Report 2016–5086 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2016 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod/. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]