Changing Perceptions of Sculptural Polychromy in Europe: from Ancient Greece to the 21St Century

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Changing Perceptions of Sculptural Polychromy in Europe: from Ancient Greece to the 21St Century SARIYILDIZ DİLARA UÇAR CHANGING PERCEPTIONS OF SCULPTURAL POLYCHROMY IN EUROPE: FROM ANCIENT GREECE TO THE 21ST CENTURY A Master’s Thesis CHANGING PERCEPTIONSCHANGING OF SCULPTURAL POLYCHROMY by FROM ANCIENT GREECE TO THE 21 DİLARA UÇAR SARIYILDIZ ST CENTURY IN EUROPE:IN Univers Bilkent Department of Archaeology i ty 2021 İhsan DoğramacıJune Bilkent2021 University Ankara To my lovely husband Irmak, my cat Tilki & Meral , Edib & Gönenç Kökdemir CHANGING PERCEPTIONS OF SCULPTURAL POLYCHROMY IN EUROPE: FROM ANCIENT GREECE TO THE 21ST CENTURY Sciences of The Graduate School of Economics and Social İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University by DİLARA UÇAR SARIYILDIZ In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS IN ARCHAEOLOGY THE DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY UNIVERSITY İHSAN DOĞRAMACI BİLKENTARA ANK June 2021 I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in Archaeology. Prof. Dr. Dominique Kassab Tezgör Supervisor I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in Archaeology . Assac Praf De Juliao Beooett Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, asa thesis for the degree of Master of Arts inArchaeology. -,----~- - Prof ıf,. Ecaoçois Queyre) Examining Committee Member Approval of the Graduate School of Economics and Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Refet Gürkaynak Director L..t . -,o. Y", L ~ .ıJJ.. ABSTRACT CHANGING PERCEPTIONS OF SCULPTURAL POLYCHROMY IN EUROPE: FROM ANCIENT GREECE TO THE 21ST CENTURY Uçar Sarıyıldız, Dilara M.A., Department of Archaeology Supervisor: Prof. Dr.June Dominique 2021 Kassab Tezgör This thesis examines the perception of polychromy in Greek sculptures over different periods by using archaeological and art historical data. To examine the usage of polychromy in Antiquity, ancient sources and technological methods have been assessed. The aim of this research is to understand the perception of color in the Greek period and to pinpoint the time of when this perception changed looking at a timespan from the Renaissance to the present. This studied identified possible motivations for the use of color in Greek sculptures: visibility, realism, meaning, completion, and tradition. It also revealed possible reasons for the rejection of color in the Renaissance and subsequent periods were also understood: contempt towards the Middle Ages, admiration for Antiquity, and establishment of a new tradition. Keywords: Polychromy, Greek Sculptures, Color Studies, Perception of Color, Color Usage x ÖZET AVRUPA’DA HEYKEL POLİKROMİSİNİN DEĞİŞEN ALGILARI: ANTİK YUNAN’DAN 21. YÜZYILA Uçar Sarıyıldız, Dilara Yüksek Lisans, Arkeoloji Bölümü Tez Yöneticisi: Prof. Dr. Dominique 2021 Kassab Tezgör Haziran Bu tez, arkeolojik ve sanat tarihi verilerini kullanarak Yunan heykellerindeki çok renklilik algısını farklı dönemlere göre incelemektedir. Çok renkliliğin Antik Çağ'daki kullanımını incelemek için antik kaynaklar ve teknolojik yöntemler değerlendirilmiştir. Bu araştırmanın amacı, Yunan dönemindeki renk algısını anlamak ve bu algının ne zaman değiştiğini Rönesans'tan günümüze uzanan bir zaman dilimine bakarak tespit etmektir. Ayrıca bu tezde, Yunan heykellerinde renk kullanımı için olası motivasyonlar belirlenmiştir: görünürlük, gerçekçilik, anlam, tamamlama ve gelenek. : AynıOrta zamanda Rönesans'ta rengin reddedilmesinin olası nedenleri de bulundu Çağ'a yönelik küçümseme, Antikite hayranlığı ve yeni bir geleneğin kurulması. Anahtar Kelimeler: Polikromi, Yunan Heykelleri, Renk Çalışmaları, Renk Algısı, Renk Kullanımı ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First of all, I would like to express my greatest gratitude to my advisor Dominique Kassab Tezgör, who brightened my way with her endless patience and constructive approach while dealing with the pandemic, which is a massive global crisis, and the difficulties of writing a thesis. I am also grateful to all of the instructors of the Bilkent University ArcheologyMarie- Department, Julian Bennett, Müge Durusu Tanrıöver, Charles Gates, Henriette Gates, İlgi Gerçek, Jacques Morin, and Thomas Zimmermann, for their support and knowledge for the years that I have been in this department (it means a lot!). I would also like to thank François Queyrel, who supported me in my literature review for a semester at the École Pratique des Hautes Études in Paris and helped complete this thesis. me I would like to thank my dearest friend Eda Doğa Aras, who always helped gather my thoughts with her different ideas and always supported me during the ten years we were a student together. I would like to thank my friends from the department, especially the team from Issues in Archaeological Theory class with Jacques Morin. Furthermore, I owe special thanks to Roslyn Sorensen for her advice and guidance in this thesis. In addition, Seren Mendeş, Defne Dedeoğlu, Mustafa Umut Dulun and Tuğçe Köseoğlu for their sincere friendships and stimulating conversations. am Finally, I owe the most and indebted to my lovely husband, Irmak Sarıyıldız, who has always supported me with his endless patience and care while working on my thesis, and my parents who always been there for me with great sacrifices during all my life. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................................................................... x ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................................... ii ÖZET ............................................................................................................. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................... 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS........................................................................................................................ 4 TABLE OF FIGURES CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 8 1.1. ..................................................................................................................... 8 1.2. Background ......................................................................................... 8 1.3. Objectives of the................................ Research ................................................................................... 9 1.4. MethodologyOutline of the Thesis .................................................................................................... 9 CHAPTER 2 POLYCHROMY INDEFINITION, ANCIENT GREECE RESEARCH, ................................ AND PURPOSES................................ OF SCULPTURAL................... 13 Polychromy ................................................................................................... 13 2.1. The Word ................................................................. 14 2.2.2.2.1. The PolychromyAncient Sources Evidence ................................ and Sources.................................................................. 14 2.2.1.1. Artifacts ............................................................................................................... 14 2.2.1.2. Ancient Authors ................................................................................................ 15 2.2.1.3. Epigraphy ............................................................................................................ 17 2.2.1.4. Iconography ....................................................................................................... 18 ................................................................................ 19 2.3. Modern Techniques ................................ of Analysis ................................................................................ 19 2.3.1. Raking Light ........................................................................................................ 19 2.3.2.2.3.3. UltravioletSpectroscopy Light .............................................................................................................. 19 ............................................................................ 20 2.3.4. Visible Induced Luminescence ..................................................................... 20 2.3.5.2.3.6. Microscopy3D Reconstructions and Pigment ................................ Analysis .................................................................. 20 CHAPTER 3 ............................................................... 22 POLYCHROMY ................................ IN GREEK WORLD................................................................................ 22 3.1. Daedalic Period 1 .................................................................................................................. 24 3.2. Archaic Period ................................................................................................................ 26 3.3. Classical Period ............................................................................................................ 28 3.4.3.4.1. Hellenistic Polychromy Period ................................................................................................................. 28 3.4.2. Monochromy .............................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Gods and Heroes: the Influence of the Classical World on Art in the 17Th & 18Th Centuries
    12/09/2017 Cycladic Figure c 2500 BC Minoan Bull Leaper c 1500 BC Gods and Heroes: the Influence of the Classical World on Art in the 17th & 18th centuries Sophia Schliemann wearing “Helen’s Jewellery” Dr William Sterling Dr William Sterling www.williamsterling.co.uk www.williamsterling.co.uk Heracles from the Parthenon Paris and Helen krater c 700 BC Roman copy of Hellenistic bust of Homer Small bronze statue of Alexander the Great c 100 BC Dr William Sterling Dr William Sterling www.williamsterling.co.uk www.williamsterling.co.uk Judgement of Paris from Etruria c 550 BC Tiberius sword hilt showing Augustus as Jupiter Arrival of Aeneas in Italy Blacas Cameo showing Augustus with aegis breastplate Augustus of Prima Porta c 25 AD Dr William Sterling (discovered 1863) Dr William Sterling www.williamsterling.co.uk www.williamsterling.co.uk 1 12/09/2017 Romulus and Remus on the Franks Casket c 700 AD Siege of Jerusalem from the Franks Casket Mantegna Triumph of Caesar Mantua c 1490 Très Riches Heures du Duc de Berry c 1410 – tapestry of Trojan War Dr William Sterling Dr William Sterling www.williamsterling.co.uk www.williamsterling.co.uk The Colosseum Rome The Parthenon Athens The Pantheon Rome Artist’s Impression of the Mausoleum of Halicarnassus showing surviving sculpture Dr William Sterling Dr William Sterling www.williamsterling.co.uk www.williamsterling.co.uk Hera and Zeus on the Parthenon Frieze in the British Museum Hermes, Dionysus, Demeter and Ares on the Parthenon Frieze Dr William Sterling Dr William Sterling www.williamsterling.co.uk
    [Show full text]
  • Opening a Museum for Everyone
    From One Louvre to Another: Opening a Museum for Everyone Jean Garnier (Meaux, 1632–Paris, 1705) Allegory of Louis XIV, Protector of Arts and Sciences 1672. Oil on canvas. H. 163; W. 204 cm Versailles, Musée National des Châteaux de Versailles et de Trianon, MV 2184. Provenance: Presented at the Academy on 30 January 1672 as a reception piece; confiscated during the Revolution in 1793; Dépôt de Nesle in 1796; Musée Spéciale de l’École Française à Versailles, Dogs’ Antechamber in Versailles under Louis-Philippe. In painting this reception piece at the Royal Academy of Painting and Sculpture, Jean Garnier was giving an astute response to the subject that had been imposed upon him. He was first instructed to paint the ‘Portrait du Roy en tableau, au milieu de divers fruictz et instruments des Arts’ [Portrait of the King in a tableau, surrounded by various fruits and instruments of the Arts]. This may seem a strange choice as it induced him to present the portrait of Louis XIV in an oval frame, suspended on braids by a red ribbon, which at first glance seems to reduce it to a purely decorative item in the midst of all the other elements comprising the still life. The work, however, is open to several levels of interpretation. Indeed, its symbolic nature did not escape contemporary viewers: ‘The King appears surrounded by fruit and a number of musical instruments, signifying in allegorical fashion the bounty of the kingdom and the harmony and concord that prevail in the government of the State.’ Louis XIV dominates the scene.
    [Show full text]
  • Key to the People and Art in Samuel F. B. Morse's Gallery of the Louvre
    15 21 26 2 13 4 8 32 35 22 5 16 27 14 33 1 9 6 23 17 28 34 3 36 7 10 24 18 29 39 C 19 31 11 12 G 20 25 30 38 37 40 D A F E H B Key to the People and Art in Samuel F. B. Morse’s Gallery of the Louvre In an effort to educate his American audience, Samuel Morse published Descriptive Catalogue of the Pictures. Thirty-seven in Number, from the Most Celebrated Masters, Copied into the “Gallery of the Louvre” (New York, 1833). The updated version of Morse’s key to the pictures presented here reflects current scholarship. Although Morse never identified the people represented in his painting, this key includes the possible identities of some of them. Exiting the gallery are a woman and little girl dressed in provincial costumes, suggesting the broad appeal of the Louvre and the educational benefits it afforded. PEOPLE 19. Paolo Caliari, known as Veronese (1528–1588, Italian), Christ Carrying A. Samuel F. B. Morse the Cross B. Susan Walker Morse, daughter of Morse 20. Leonardo da Vinci (1452–1519, Italian), Mona Lisa C. James Fenimore Cooper, author and friend of Morse 21. Antonio Allegri, known as Correggio (c. 1489?–1534, Italian), Mystic D. Susan DeLancy Fenimore Cooper Marriage of St. Catherine of Alexandria E. Susan Fenimore Cooper, daughter of James and Susan DeLancy 22. Peter Paul Rubens (1577–1640, Flemish), Lot and His Family Fleeing Fenimore Cooper Sodom F. Richard W. Habersham, artist and Morse’s roommate in Paris 23.
    [Show full text]
  • Artemis: Depictions of Form and Femininity in Sculpture Laura G
    Student Publications Student Scholarship Fall 2017 Artemis: Depictions of Form and Femininity in Sculpture Laura G. Waters Gettysburg College Follow this and additional works at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship Part of the Ancient, Medieval, Renaissance and Baroque Art and Architecture Commons, and the Sculpture Commons Share feedback about the accessibility of this item. Waters, Laura G., "Artemis: Depictions of Form and Femininity in Sculpture" (2017). Student Publications. 658. https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship/658 This open access student research paper is brought to you by The uC pola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of The uC pola. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Artemis: Depictions of Form and Femininity in Sculpture Abstract Grecian sculpture has been the subject of investigation for centuries. More recently, however, emphasis in the field of Art History on the politics of gender and sexuality portrayal have opened new avenues for investigation of those old statues. In depicting gender, Ancient Greek statuary can veer towards the non- binary, with the most striking examples being works depicting Hermaphroditos and ‘his’ bodily form. Yet even within the binary, there are complications. Depictions of the goddess Artemis are chief among these complications of the binary, with even more contradiction, subtext, and varied interpretation than representations of Amazons. The umen rous ways Artemis has been portrayed over the years highlight her multifarious aspects, but often paint a contradictory portrait of her femininity. Is she the wild mother? The asexual huntress? Or is she a tempting virgin, whose purity is at risk? Depictions of her in sculptural form, deliberately composed, offer answers.
    [Show full text]
  • Insights from Stourhead Gardens
    Open Research Online The Open University’s repository of research publications and other research outputs Myth In Reception: Insights From Stourhead Gardens Thesis How to cite: Harrison, John Edward (2018). Myth In Reception: Insights From Stourhead Gardens. PhD thesis The Open University. For guidance on citations see FAQs. c 2017 The Author https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Version: Version of Record Link(s) to article on publisher’s website: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21954/ou.ro.0000d97e Copyright and Moral Rights for the articles on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. For more information on Open Research Online’s data policy on reuse of materials please consult the policies page. oro.open.ac.uk Myth in reception: Insights from Stourhead gardens John Edward Harrison BSc (Hons) Psychology, University of Hertfordshire, UK Dip CS, Open University, UK PhD Neuroscience, University of London, UK Thesis submitted to The Open University in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) The Open University December 2017 1 Declaration I declare that this thesis represents my own work, except where due acknowledgement is made, and that is has not been previously submitted to the Open University or to any other institution for a degree, diploma or other qualification. 2 Abstract The focus of my thesis is the reception of classical myth in Georgian Britain as exemplified by responses to the garden imagery at Stourhead, Wiltshire. Previous explanations have tended to the view that the gardens were designed to recapitulate Virgil’s Aeneid.
    [Show full text]
  • In Search for Lost Colours. Challenge Accepted
    In search for lost colours. Challenge accepted. Cristiana BARANDONI, Museo Archeologico Nazionale di Napoli Keywords: polychromy; 3d modelling; archives; metadata. The National Archaeological Museum of Naples has adopted in its most recent history and post Ministry Reform a series of innovative strategies, whose physical and digital purpose is focusing on conscious, inclusive and responsible approach. The Museum's choices respond to the need to have specific devices welcoming and satisfying today's globalized and dynamic society; thanks to recent technological improvements museums are helped in this hard responsibility, thanks to the wide range of possibilities to choose from [Soren 2009]. The National Museum decided to set a cultural policy that considers individual, collective, physical and economic dimensions as priorities; without this approach to culture and communication it would not have been possible to carry out Mann-In-Colours, a scientific project carried out in collaboration with the National Taiwan Normal University of Taipei. The project examines chromatic traces, sometimes imperceptible to the human eye but still existing on sculptures and will aim at a visual recovery that will revolutionize the aesthetic perception to which these works have accustomed people for centuries [Jockey 2014]. From educational and pedagogic point of view MannInColours attempts to relate to general public a fundamental cognitive message for a sustainable philologically correct approach to Greek and Roman statuary: a coloured vision (Fig. 1). Fig. 1. Lovatelli Venus (part.). Inv. 109608. Museo Archeologico Nazionale di Napoli. (© Cristiana Barandoni) This approach seeks to comprehend the nature of a coloured ancient world opposed to black and white general traditional experiential approaches, which prioritize descriptions of our ordinary visual experience of colour.
    [Show full text]
  • German Historical Institute London Bulletin Vol 34 (2012), No. 2
    German Historical Institute London Bulletin Volume XXXIV, No. 2 November 2012 CONTENTS Articles Artistic Encounters: British Perspectives on Bavaria and Saxony in the Vormärz (Hannelore Putz) 3 ‘De-Industrialization’: A Research Project on the Societal History of Economic Change in Britain (1970–90) (Jörg Arnold) 34 Review Article The Hidden Transcript: The Deformation of the Self in Germany’s Dictatorial Regimes (Bernd Weisbrod) 61 Book Reviews David Rollason, Conrad Leyser, and Hannah Williams (eds.), England and the Continent in the Tenth Century: Studies in Honour of Wilhelm Levison (1876–1947) (Benjamin Pohl) 73 Craig Koslofsky, Evening’s Empire: A History of the Night in Early Modern Europe (Andreas Bähr) 78 Jerrold Seigel, Modernity and Bourgeois Life: Society, Politics, and Culture in England, France and Germany since 1750 (Andreas Fahrmeir) 84 Frank Lorenz Müller, Our Fritz: Emperor Frederick III and the Pol itical Culture of Imperial Germany (Martin Kohlrausch) 89 (cont.) Contents Anne Friedrichs, Das Empire als Aufgabe des Historikers. Historio graphie in imperialen Nationalstaaten: Großbritannien und Frankreich 1919–1968 (Roger Chickering) 94 J. A. S. Grenville, The Jews and Germans of Hamburg: The De - struc tion of a Civilization 1790–1945 (Moshe Zimmermann) 97 Ian Kershaw, The End: Hitler’s Germany, 1944–45 (Lothar Kettenacker) 103 Antje Robrecht, ‘Diplomaten in Hemdsärmeln?’ Auslands korre - s pon denten als Akteure in den deutsch-britischen Beziehungen 1945–1962 (Christian Haase) 107 Conference Reports Diverging Paths?
    [Show full text]
  • Gods in Color' Returns Antiquities to Their Original, Colorful Grandeur
    AiA Art News-service 'Gods in Color' returns antiquities to their original, colorful grandeur Updated 30th November 2017 VIEW GALLERY 13 Pictures 'Gods in Color' returns antiquities to their original, colorful grandeur Written by Jacopo Prisco, CNN Artists in classical cultures such as Egypt, Mesopotamia, Greece and Rome were known to paint with a variety of hues -- a practice known as polychromy (from Greek, meaning "many colors.") So why do we always think of antiquities as colorless? Related: Astonishing sculptures made from nothing but plain paper The myth of the white marble started during the Renaissance, when we first began unearthing ancient statues. Most of them had lost their original paint after centuries of exposure to the elements, and contemporary artists imitated their appearance by leaving their stone unpainted. The trend continued into the 18th century as excavations brought more and more artworks to light. That's also when Johann Joachim Winckelmann, who many consider the father of art history, literally wrote the book on ancient art, framing our modern view of it. Although he was aware of the historical evidence that sculptures were once colorful (some discoveries even had some paint left on) he helped idolize whiteness. "The whiter the body is, the more beautiful it is as well. Color contributes to beauty, but it is not beauty. Color should have a minor part in the consideration of beauty, because it is not (color) but structure that constitutes its essence," he wrote. This statue of a lion from 350 BC is colorless now, but was almost surely painted with offsetting colors for the body and the mane.
    [Show full text]
  • The Polychromy of Greek and Roman Art; an Investigation of Museum Practices
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Dissertations and Theses City College of New York 2012 The Polychromy of Greek and Roman Art; An Investigation of Museum Practices Meghan Combs CUNY City College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cc_etds_theses/148 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] The Polychromy of Greek and Roman Art: An Investigation of Museum Practices Meghan K. Combs Advisors: Harriet Senie, Linda Kastan December 10, 2012 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts of the City College of the City University of New York Table of Contents Introduction 1 Chapter 1: The History of Greek and Roman Polychromy and Its Reception 3 The Greeks 3 The Romans 12 The Renaissance 17 Nineteenth Century 20 Twentieth Century 24 Summary 25 Chapter 2: Modern Scholarship on Greek and Roman Polychromy 27 Gisela Richter: Early Greek Polychromy 27 David Batchelor: "Chromophobia" 30 Vinzez Brinkmann: Color Detecting Techniques 32 Mark B. Abbe: Roman Polychromy 34 Summary 36 Chapter 3: Museum Practices and Exhibitions 37 The Metropolitan Museum of Art 37 The Museum of Fine Arts, Boston 42 Exhibition: Gods in Color: Painted Sculpture of Classical Antiquity 46 The J. Paul Getty Museum 49 Summary 51 Chapter 4: Exhibition of the MMA's Permanent Collection 52 The Exhibition 52 Conclusion 57 Images 59 Introduction The fact that Greek and Roman sculpture was once brightly painted was the subject of an ongoing debate among art historians since the early nineteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • GODS in COLOR Painted Sculpture of Classical Antiquity
    GODS IN COLOR PAinTED scUlpTURE OF CLAssicAL AnTIQUITY ARTHUR M. SACKLER MUSEUM u SEPTEMBER 22, 2007–JANUARY 20, 2008 GODS IN COLOR PAINTED SCULPTURE OF CLASSICAL ANTIQUITY “When asked which of his works in marble he SUSANNE EBBINGHAUS liked the most, Praxiteles used to say: ‘Those to which Nikias has set his hand’—so highly did he esteem his coloring of the surface.”1 This anecdote by the Roman writer Pliny about the fourth-century BC Greek sculptor Praxiteles reveals that it was common practice in ancient Greece to finish marble statues with paint. It also indicates that the painted decora- No original work has survived that may with tion was considered an integral part of the certainty be attributed to Praxiteles or to other sculpture, and that it could be carried out by well-known Greek sculptors, be they Myron, skilled painters. The Nikias of the anecdote is Polykleitos, Pheidias, Skopas, or Lysippos. This is likely the noted Athenian painter of the same true for marble sculpture, but even more so for name, a younger contemporary of Praxiteles. bronze. Many artists of the classical and Helle- nistic periods (480–31 BC) favored bronze as the material for statues. Because of the inherent value of the metal, few ancient bronzes are extant today. Only fragments remain of the even more precious chryselephantine statues of gold and ivory, such as Pheidias’s colossal cult images of Athena and Zeus. For information on all these lost masterpieces, we depend on ancient texts and the evidence of marble copies or variants of Greek statuary made in the Roman period.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuerscheinungsdienst
    Neuerscheinungsdienst Jahrgang: 2017 ND 44 Stand: 01. November 2017 Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (Leipzig, Frankfurt am Main) 2017 ISSN 1611-0153 urn:nbn:de:101-201612065317 2 Hinweise Der Neuerscheinungsdienst ist das Ergebnis der Ko- blikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; de- operation zwischen der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek und taillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über der MVB Marketing- und Verlagsservice des Buchhandels http://dnb.dnb.de abrufbar. GmbH. Ziel dieser Kooperation ist zum einen die Hebung Bibliographic information published by the Deut- des Qualitätsstandards des Verzeichnisses lieferbarer sche Nationalbibliothek Bücher (VLB) und zum anderen die Verbesserung der The Deutsche Naitonalbibliothek lists this publication in Aktualität und Vollständigkeit der Deutschen Nationalbi- the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic bliografie. In der Titelaufnahme wird der entsprechende data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. Link zu den Verlagsangaben direkt geschaltet; ebenso Information bibliographique de la Deutsche Natio- alle anderen möglichen Links. nalbibliothek Die Verleger melden ihre Titel in einem einzigen Vor- La Deutsche Nationalbibliothek a répertoiré cette publi- gang für das VLB und den Neuerscheinungsdienst der cation dans la Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; les données Deutschen Nationalbibliothek. Dieser zeigt somit alle bibliographiques détaillées peuvent être consultées sur Neumeldungen von Titeln an, die auch in das VLB ein- Internet à l’adresse http://dnb.dnb.de gehen. Die VLB-Redaktion leitet die Meldungen an die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek weiter. Die Titel werden oh- Die Verleger übersenden gemäß den gesetzlichen Vor- ne weitere Änderungen im Neuerscheinungsdienst der schriften zur Pflichtablieferung zwei Pflichtexemplare je Deutschen Nationalbibliothek angezeigt. Die Titelanzei- nach Zuständigkeit an die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek gen selbst sind, wie auf der Sachgruppenübersicht an- nach Frankfurt am Main oder nach Leipzig.
    [Show full text]
  • IMA 6 F3 1-25.Indd
    STEVEN FINE Yeshiva University MENORAHS IN COLOR: POLYCHROMY IN JEWISH VISUAL CULTURE OF ROMAN ANTIQUITY* Abstract of yellow ochre were found on the arms and base of In recent years, polychromy has developed as a significant the menorah. Dr. Piening was responsible for detecting area of research in the study of classical art. This essay explores the traces of yellow ochre on the menorah relief. His the significance of this work for interpreting Jewish visual discovery was all the more remarkable in that he uses culture during Roman antiquity, through the focal lens of the a non-invasive technique called UV-VIS spectrometry, Arch of Titus Digital Restoration Project. In July 2012, this which means that the arch can be studied with no risk project discovered that the Arch of Titus menorah was origi- of damage.1 nally colored with yellow ochre paint. The article begins by The Arch of Titus Digital Restoration Project, of presenting the general field of polychromy research, which has which I am the director, is the first major research developed in recent years and resulted in significant museum project related to polychromy in an artifact of signifi- exhibitions in Europe and the US. It then turns to resistance to polychromy studies among art historians, often called cance for the history of Judaism as yet undertaken “chromophobia,” and to uniquely Jewish early twentieth- (fig. 1). It is, in fact, part of a larger transformation in century variants that claimed that Jews were especially prone contemporary scholarship, whereby the significance of to colorblindness. After surveying earlier research on poly- polychromy in ancient art has become a major new chromy in Jewish contexts, we turn to polychromy in ancient preoccupation.
    [Show full text]