(Acoustic Neuroma) After Stereotactic Radiosurgery
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Otology & Neurotology 24:650–660 © 2003, Otology & Neurotology, Inc. Clinical and Histopathologic Features of Recurrent Vestibular Schwannoma (Acoustic Neuroma) after Stereotactic Radiosurgery *Daniel J. Lee, *†William H. Westra, ‡Hinrich Staecker, §Donlin Long, and *John K. Niparko Departments of *Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, †Pathology, and §Neurologic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine; and ‡Division of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A. Objective: Stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwan- the cerebellopontine angle and internal auditory canal. Fibrosis noma entails uncertain long-term risk of tumor recurrence and outside and within the tumor bed varied markedly, complicat- delayed cranial neuropathies. In addition, the underlying histo- ing microsurgical dissection. Light microscopy confirmed the pathologic changes to the tumor bed are not fully characterized. presence of viable tumor in all cases. Histopathologic features We seek to understand the clinical and histologic features of were typical of vestibular schwannoma, and there was no sig- recurrent vestibular schwannoma after stereotactic radiation nificant scarring that could be attributed to radiation effect. therapy. Conclusions: The variable fibrosis in the cerebellopontine Study Design: Retrospective review. angle and lack of radiation changes seen histopathologically in Setting: Tertiary referral center. irradiated vestibular schwannoma suggest that a uniform treat- Patients: Four patients who underwent microsurgical resection ment effect was not achieved in these cases. Although all four of vestibular schwannoma after primary stereotactic radiation patients with preoperative cranial neuropathies were found in- therapy. traoperatively to have fibrosis in the cerebellopontine angle, Intervention: Patients were treated primarily with gamma excellent preservation of facial nerve anatomy and function knife radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy fol- was possible with salvage microsurgical resection. Additional lowed by salvage microsurgery. Retrosigmoid craniotomy was analyses are needed to clarify the histopathologic and molecu- used in all cases. lar characteristics associated with vestibular schwannoma Main Outcome Measures: Histopathologic review. Preopera- growth after stereotactic radiation. Key Words: Microsur- tive and postoperative facial nerve function was assessed with gical resection—Stereotactic radiation therapy—Vestibular the House-Brackmann scale. schwannoma. Results: We observed highly inconsistent radiation changes in Otol Neurotol 24:650–660, 2003. The mainstay of vestibular schwannoma (VS) man- resulting in minimal morbidity and mortality (1,4,12) agement has traditionally been microsurgical resection and favorable long-term recurrence rates ranging from by an experienced neurotologic and neurosurgical team. 0.5 to 1.5% (3,13). Refinements in neuroanesthesia and Excellent outcomes have been reported from surgery for postoperative critical care have also contributed to the VS regarding anatomic preservation of the facial nerve safety of craniotomy and microsurgical resection for VS. (1–4), facial nerve function (1–5), and serviceable hear- Stereotactic radiosurgery (“gamma knife”) and frac- ing preservation (6–11). Complete tumor removal can be tionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSR) have become in- achieved through meticulous microsurgical dissection, creasingly popular alternatives to microsurgical resection for the primary treatment of VS. Stereotactic radiosur- gery, developed by Lars Leksell in 1951 (14) and used on Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. John Niparko, VS patients for the first time in 1969 (15), involves the Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Outpatient Center, 601 biologic inactivation of a three-dimensional target by a North Caroline Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, U.S.A.; Email: single dose of ionizing radiation (16). In contrast, FSR [email protected] involves multiple treatment sessions to deliver a thera- 650 ACOUSTIC NEUROMA AFTER STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY 651 peutic radiation dose to the tumor. Regardless of tech- ries of five patients with recurrent VS after stereotactic nique, treatment-related morbidity is comparable, if not radiation. Three of five patients had complete facial improved, in patients who receive radiation therapy com- palsy preoperatively, and significant scarring to the facial pared with microsurgical resection (17–20). Because a nerve and brainstem was encountered intraoperatively. craniotomy and general anesthesia are avoided, radiation This represented a substantially poorer outcome com- therapy is also a reasonable alternative to surgery for the pared with comparably sized tumors treated primarily elderly or patients with symptomatic or growing tumors, with microsurgical resection (1,3,4,12). The purpose of who are poor surgical candidates (21). our retrospective study is to more fully clarify the clini- Approximately 10 in 1 million persons in the United cal presentations, intraoperative findings, histopathol- States are diagnosed with VS (22). Using an estimated ogy, and postoperative follow-up of four patients with 2001 U.S. population of 285 million persons, approxi- recurrent VS after primary stereotactic radiation. mately 3,000 new cases of VS will be diagnosed in 2002. Proponents of radiation therapy predict that in 10 years, PATIENTS AND MATERIALS an equal number of these patients will receive either Subjects used for this study received either primary gamma stereotactic radiation or microsurgery as the primary mo- knife radiosurgery or FSR for VS diagnosed by gadolinium- dality for VS (23). However, the decision to choose mi- enhanced MRI. Informed consent was obtained from all pa- crosurgical resection or radiosurgery is still controver- tients used in this study. In all four subjects, microsurgical sial. The obvious disadvantage with “radiosurgery” or salvage resection was prompted by recurrent tumor growth and radiotherapy is that tumor volume is not directly reduced associated delayed cranial neuropathies. Tumor resection was or removed; treatment success with radiation is measured performed using a retrosigmoid craniotomy approach by a neu- rotologic surgeon and neurosurgeon. Intraoperative cranial in terms of tumor growth suppression as demonstrated by nerve monitoring was used in all cases. A retrospective review serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In addition, of the medical records of two tertiary care medical centers was although radiation therapy for VS has shown low tumor performed. Axial and coronal, gadolinium-enhanced MRI regrowth rates ranging from 2 to 9% (24–26) with mean scans were analyzed and correlated with intraoperative findings follow-up periods of 2 to 5 years (17,20,27–32), long- and histopathology. Hematoxylin and eosin–stained pathologic term studies after consistent radiotherapeutic approaches slides were retrieved from the files of the respective depart- are still needed. ments of surgical pathology. When an irradiated VS becomes symptomatic and dis- plays continued growth, microsurgical salvage is often CASE REPORTS indicated. Unfortunately, the surgery can be complicated Case 1 by scarring and increased perioperative morbidity A healthy 72-year-old woman presented to an outside (11,33–35). Slattery and Brackmann (33) reviewed a se- institution with progressive tinnitus and sensorineural FIG. 1. T1-weighted, post–gadolinium-enhanced MRI scans of the cerebellopontine angle from Case 1. Axial images (A–C) and coronal sections (D–F). (A and D) Pre–gamma knife MRI scans demonstrating a right-sided 1.0-cm VS, with scans at 6 months (B and E) and 20 months (C and F) after radiation. Slight tumor involution seen in B was followed by rapid regrowth to 1.5 cm at 1 year after radiosurgery (MRI scan not shown). Otology & Neurotology, Vol. 24, No. 4, 2003 652 D. J. LEE ET AL. hearing loss. She denied dizziness, headaches, facial countered, with no evidence of radiation-induced nerve twitching, or weakness. A right-sided, 1.0 × 0.7- changes of the posterior and medial surfaces. Complete cm intracanalicular VS was diagnosed (Fig. 1), and she resection of VS was achieved, with anatomic preserva- underwent gamma knife radiosurgery. The radiation dose tion of the facial nerve. delivered was 13 Gy. She initially did well, with 50% tumor involution at 6 months after radiation therapy. Postoperative course However, she began to experience episodic right-sided She recovered uneventfully, with normal facial nerve facial nerve spasms at 12 months after radiosurgery. function (Fig. 2, A–C). Her hospital stay was 5 days. These symptoms were partially relieved with botulinum Now, 15 months after surgery, she has no recurrent facial toxin injections. Serial MRI (Fig. 1) demonstrated in- nerve spasms. Final pathologic findings were consistent creased tumor growth to 1.5 × 1.0 cm after radiosurgery. with vestibular schwannoma. She was referred for surgical management. Case 2 Intraoperative findings A 54-year-old healthy woman presented with unilat- A right suboccipital craniotomy approach was used. eral sensorineural hearing loss and dizziness, and was Significant scarring and fibrosis of the inferior and an- diagnosed with a 2.6-cm left-sided acoustic neuroma. terior portions of this intracanalicular tumor were en- She underwent FSR to 25 Gy. A 6-month follow-up MRI