Desktop Study
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
PALAEONTOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT: DESKTOP STUDY PROPOSED BEZALEL ECO-ESTATE DEVELOPMENT ON PORTIONS 135 AND 136 OF THE FARM TOWNLANDS OF MARTHINUS WESSELSTROOM 121 HT NEAR WAKKERSTROOM, MPUMALANGA John E. Almond PhD (Cantab.) Natura Viva cc, PO Box 12410 Mill Street, Cape Town 8010, RSA [email protected] November 2013 1. SUMMARY Nulani Investments Pty Ltd is proposing to construct a residential development, known as the Bezalel Eco-estate, on portions 135 and 136 of the farm Townlands of Marthinus Wesselstroom 121HT, situated c. 6.5 km northwest of the small town of Wakkerstroom, Mpumalanga. The lower-lying, southern portion of the Bezalel Eco-estate study area is underlain by offshore mudrocks of the Middle to Late Permian Volksrust Formation (Ecca Group) that are extensively intruded by dolerite sills. The fossil record of the dark Volksrust mudrocks is generally poor, with locally abundant organic-walled microfossils and trace fossils (e.g. invertebrate burrows) plus rare records of both marine and freshwater bivalve molluscs. Richer plant and insect biotas may occur in nearshore, deltaic sediments high up within the succession, but the stratigraphic position of these fossiliferous beds is poorly-defined. Steeper escarpment slopes featuring prominent- weathering sandstones in the study area are assigned to the Normandien Formation (Lower Beaufort Group) of Latest Permian age. This fluvio-deltaic succession of interbedded mudrocks and sandstones (previously referred to the Estcourt Formation) is well-known in Kwazulu-Natal for its diverse, well-preserved fossil floras - predominantly ferns and glossopterid pteridosperms, with minor coniferophytes. These are sometimes associated with important insect faunas. The Normandien fossil assemblages are generally found within recessive-weathering laminated mudrock horizons that are not at all well-exposed in the study area and that may well have been baked by the dolerite sill that caps the higher ground in the study area. Infrastructure constructed in the low-lying, southwestern portions of the Belazel study area is unlikely to have significant impacts on local fossil heritage resources since this region is underlain by poorly-fossiliferous, baked Volksrust mudrocks and unfossiliferous dolerite. The higher-lying, steeper slopes built of sandstone-rich Normandien (Escourt) Formation rocks are more palaeontologically sensitive, but again baking by dolerite may have compromised fossil heritage here. Any substantial excavations (e.g. for building foundations) into the Normandien bedrocks should be monitored for fossils (e.g. plant-rich mudrock horizons) by a professional palaeontologist during the construction phase. The highest ground along the north-eastern and eastern edge of the study area overlies unfossiliferous dolerite. Should any substantial fossil remains (e.g. vertebrate bones and teeth, petrified wood, plant fossil assemblages) be encountered during excavation, these should be reported to SAHRA for possible mitigation by a professional palaeontologist at the developers expense (SAHRA contact details: Ms. Colette Scheermeyer, South African Heritage Resources Agency, 111 Harrington Street. P.O. Box 4637, Cape Town 8000. Tel: 021 462 4502. Email: [email protected]. Fax: +27 (0)21 462 4509. Web:www.sahra.org.za). John E. Almond (2013) 1 Natura Viva cc 2. INTRODUCTION & BRIEF The company Nulani Investments Pty Ltd is proposing to develop a residential eco-estate (Bezalel Eco-estate) on portions 135 (a portion of portion 1) and 136 (a portion of portion 1) of the farm Townlands of Marthinus Wesselstroom 121HT, situated some 6.5 km northwest of the small town of Wakkerstroom, Mpumalanga (Figs. 1 to 3). The residential component of the estate, comprising 59 residential erven and a hotel, will be situated on a portion of Portion 136 while a manager’s residence with workshop, estate services and stables will be accommodated on Portion 135. The development footprint will be no more than 19 ha and include: 59 residential erven and related infrastructure; A hotel erf including conference venue and convenience shops as well as 25 accommodation rooms; and an erf for the management of the estate with a manager’s residence, estate office, guard house, workshop, services, animal accommodation and stables. The study area near Wakkerstroom is underlain by potentially fossiliferous sediments of Palaeozoic age (Ecca and Beaufort Groups, Karoo Supergroup) that may be disturbed or excavated during the construction phase of development. A palaeontological heritage assessment for the project was requested by SAHRA in accordance with the requirements of the National Heritage Resources Act, 1999 (SAHRA Ref: 16/5/1 Bezalel Eco-Estate, dated August 19, 2013). The present desktop report was therefore commissioned on behalf of the developer by KZK Urban Planning Studio (Contact details: Sieghard Knöcklein. KZK Urban Planning Studio, 282 Joubert Street, WAKKERSTROOM 2480. Tel: +27(81) 797 6211; Fax: +27 (86) 766 6795; E-mail: [email protected]). The brief for the study, as specified by SAHRA, is as follows: A Palaeontological study must be undertaken to assess whether or not the development will impact upon significant palaeontological resources. Alternatively, a letter of exemption from a Palaeontologist is required to indicate that this is unnecessary. If the area is deemed sensitive or if significant heritage is identified, a full Palaeontological Report may be required. John E. Almond (2013) 2 Natura Viva cc N 5 km Fig. 1. Approximate location (blue rectangle) of the proposed Bezalel Eco-Estate study area some 6.5 km northwest of Wakkerstroom, Mpumalanga (Map abstracted from topographical sheet 2720 Vryheid, Courtesy of the Chief Directorate, National Geo-spatial Information, Mowbray). John E. Almond (2013) 3 Natura Viva cc N 2 km Fig. 2. Extract from 1: 50 000 topographical sheet 2730AC Wakkerstroom (courtesy of the Chief Directorate, National Geo-spatial Information, Mowbray) showing the outline of the Bezalel Eco-estate study area on portions 135 and 136 of the farm Townlands Of Marthinus Wesselstroom 121 HT, northwest of Wakkerstroom (red polygon). John E. Almond (2013) 4 Natura Viva cc Fig. 3. Google earth© satellite image of the region to the northwest of Wakkerstroom, Mpumalanga showing the dissected mountainous terrain in the Bezalel Eco-estate study area (approximately indicated by the yellow rectangle). Gently-sloping to hilly terrain in the lowlands, away from the mountains, is underlain by mudrocks of the Volksrust Formation. Prominent-weathering pale sandstones of the Normandien Formation (= Escourt Formation) are seen in the escarpment. Faint reddish-brown hues on the plateau above the sandstones as well as beneath them reflect intrusive sills of the Karoo Dolerite Suite. 1.2. Legislative context of this palaeontological study The various categories of heritage resources recognised as part of the National Estate in Section 3 of the National Heritage Resources Act (1999) include, among others: geological sites of scientific or cultural importance; palaeontological sites; palaeontological objects and material, meteorites and rare geological specimens. According to Section 35 of the National Heritage Resources Act, dealing with archaeology, palaeontology and meteorites: (1) The protection of archaeological and palaeontological sites and material and meteorites is the responsibility of a provincial heritage resources authority. (2) All archaeological objects, palaeontological material and meteorites are the property of the State. (3) Any person who discovers archaeological or palaeontological objects or material or a meteorite in the course of development or agricultural activity must immediately report the find to the responsible heritage resources authority, or to the nearest local authority offices or museum, which must immediately notify such heritage resources authority. (4) No person may, without a permit issued by the responsible heritage resources authority— John E. Almond (2013) 5 Natura Viva cc (a) destroy, damage, excavate, alter, deface or otherwise disturb any archaeological or palaeontological site or any meteorite; (b) destroy, damage, excavate, remove from its original position, collect or own any archaeological or palaeontological material or object or any meteorite; (c) trade in, sell for private gain, export or attempt to export from the Republic any category of archaeological or palaeontological material or object, or any meteorite; or (d) bring onto or use at an archaeological or palaeontological site any excavation equipment or any equipment which assist in the detection or recovery of metals or archaeological and palaeontological material or objects, or use such equipment for the recovery of meteorites. (5) When the responsible heritage resources authority has reasonable cause to believe that any activity or development which will destroy, damage or alter any archaeological or palaeontological site is under way, and where no application for a permit has been submitted and no heritage resources management procedure in terms of section 38 has been followed, it may— (a) serve on the owner or occupier of the site or on the person undertaking such development an order for the development to cease immediately for such period as is specified in the order; (b) carry out an investigation for the purpose of obtaining information on whether or not an archaeological or palaeontological site exists and whether mitigation is necessary; (c)