Geometry from a Differentiable Viewpoint

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Geometry from a Differentiable Viewpoint Geometry from a Differentiable Viewpoint The development of geometry from Euclid to Euler to Lobachevski˘ı, Bolyai, Gauss, and Riemann is a story that is often broken into parts – axiomatic geome- try, non-Euclidean geometry, and differential geometry. This poses a problem for undergraduates: Which part is geometry? What is the big picture to which these parts belong? In this introduction to differential geometry, the parts are united with all of their interrelations, motivated by the history of the parallel postulate. Beginning with the ancient sources, the author first explores synthetic methods in Euclidean and non-Euclidean geometry and then introduces differential geometry in its classical formulation, leading to the modern formulation on manifolds such as space-time. The presentation is enlivened by historical diversions such as Hugyens’s clock and the mathematics of cartography. The intertwined approaches will help under- graduates understand the role of elementary ideas in the more general, differential setting. This thoroughly revised second edition includes numerous new exercises, together with newly prepared solutions to selected exercises. JOHN MCCLEARY is professor of mathematics at Vassar College on the Elizabeth Stillman Williams Chair. His research interests lie at the boundary between geom- etry and topology, especially where algebraic topology plays a role. His research papers have appeared in journals such as Inventiones Mathematicae and the American Journal of Mathematics, and he has also written expository papers in the American Mathematical Monthly. He is interested in the history of mathemat- ics, particularly the history of geometry in the nineteenth century and of topology in the twentieth century. He is the author of A User’s Guide to Spectral Sequences and A First Course in Topology: Continuity and Dimension, and he has edited pro- ceedings in topology and in history, as well as a volume of the collected works of John Milnor. Geometry from a Differentiable Viewpoint Second Edition JOHN MC CLEARY Vassar College CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo, Delhi, Mexico City Cambridge University Press 32 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10013-2473, USA www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521133111 c Cambridge University Press 1995, 2013 This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 1995 Second edition published 2013 Printed in the United States of America A catalog record for this publication is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data McCleary, John, 1952– Geometry from a differentiable viewpoint / John McCleary. – 2nd ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and indexes. ISBN 978-0-521-11607-7 (hardback) – ISBN 978-0-521-13311-1 (pbk.) 1. Geometry, Differential. I. Title. QA641.M38 2012 516.3 6–dc23 2012017159 ISBN 978-0-521-11607-7 Hardback ISBN 978-0-521-13311-1 Paperback Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or third-party Internet Web sites referred to in this publication and does not guarantee that any content on such Web sites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate. To my sisters Mary Ann, Denise, Rose • Contents Preface to the second edition page ix Introduction xi PART A Prelude and themes: Synthetic methods and results 1 Spherical geometry 3 2Euclid 12 Euclid’s theory of parallels 19 Appendix: The Elements: Book I 24 3 The theory of parallels 27 Uniqueness of parallels 28 Equidistance and boundedness of parallels 29 On the angle sum of a triangle 31 Similarity of triangles 34 The work of Saccheri 37 4 Non-Euclidean geometry 43 The work of Gauss 43 The hyperbolic plane 47 Digression: Neutral space 55 Hyperbolic space 62 Appendix: The Elements: Selections from Book XI 72 PART B Development: Differential geometry 5 Curves in the plane 77 Early work on plane curves (Huygens, Leibniz, Newton, and Euler) 81 The tractrix 84 Oriented curvature 86 Involutes and evolutes 89 6 Curves in space 99 Appendix: On Euclidean rigid motions 110 7 Surfaces 116 The tangent plane 124 The first fundamental form 128 Lengths, angles, and areas 130 7bis Map projections 138 Stereographic projection 143 vii viii Contents Central (gnomonic) projection 147 Cylindrical projections 148 Sinusoidal projection 152 Azimuthal projection 153 8 Curvature for surfaces 156 Euler’s work on surfaces 156 The Gauss map 159 9 Metric equivalence of surfaces 171 Special coordinates 179 10 Geodesics 185 Euclid revisited I: The Hopf–Rinow Theorem 195 11 The Gauss–Bonnet Theorem 201 Euclid revisited II: Uniqueness of lines 205 Compact surfaces 207 A digression on curves 211 12 Constant-curvature surfaces 218 Euclid revisited III: Congruences 223 The work of Minding 224 Hilbert’s Theorem 231 PART C Recapitulation and coda 13 Abstract surfaces 237 14 Modeling the non-Euclidean plane 251 The Beltrami disk 255 The Poincaré disk 262 The Poincaré half-plane 265 15 Epilogue: Where from here? 282 Manifolds (differential topology) 283 Vector and tensor fields 287 Metrical relations (Riemannian manifolds) 289 Curvature 294 Covariant differentiation 303 Riemann’s Habilitationsvortrag: On the hypotheses which lie at the foundations of geometry 313 Solutions to selected exercises 325 Bibliography 341 Symbol index 351 Name index 352 Subject index 354 • Preface to the second edition Giving an author a chance to rewrite a text is a mixed blessing. The temptation to rewrite every sentence is strong, as is the temptation to throw everything out and start over. When I asked colleagues who had taught from the book what I might change, I was surprised in one case to hear that I should change nothing. That presented a challenge to preparing a second edition. Several folks were kind enough to point out errors in the first edition that I have fixed. Many thanks to you. Among these errors was a mishandling of congruences that has led to additional material in this edition. The notion of congruence leads to the important theory of transformation groups and to Klein’s Erlangen Program. I have taken some of the opportunities to apply arguments using transformations, exposing another of the pillars of geometry (Stillwell 2005) to the reader. Succumbing to the second temptation, I have reordered the material signifi- cantly, resulting in one fewer chapter and a better story line. Chapter 4 is a more or less self-contained exposition of non-Euclidean geometry, and it now parallels Chapter 14 better. I have added material including Euclid’s geometry of space, fur- ther results on cycloids, another map projection, Clairaut’s relation, and reflections in the Beltrami disk. I have also added new exercises. Due to a loss of files for the first edition, all of the pictures have been redrawn and improved. In many places I have made small changes that I hope improve the clarity of my telling of this amazing and rich story. ix • Introduction AEMETPHTOMHEIEIIT ABOVETHEENTRANCETOPLATO’SACADEMY Oneofthemanyrolesofhistoryistotellastory.ThehistoryoftheParallelPos- tulateisagreatstory.Itspansmorethantwomillennia,starsanimpressivecastof characters,andcontainssomeofthemostbeautifulresultsinallofmathematics. Myimmodestgoalforthisbookistotellthisstory. Anotherroleofhistoryistofocusourattention.Wecanthenseeathreadof unitythroughaparadeofevents,people,andideas.Mymoremodestgoalisto provideafocuswithwhichtoviewthestandardtoolsofelementarydifferential geometry,anddiscoverhowtheirhistoryemergesoutofGeometrywritlarge,and howtheydevelopedintothemodern,globaledificeoftoday. Inrecentyears,toofferacourseindifferentialgeometrytoundergraduateshas becomealuxury.Whensuchacourseexists,itsstudentsoftenarrivewithamodern introductiontoanalysis,butwithouthavingseengeometrysincehighschool.Inthe UnitedStateshighschoolgeometryisgenerallyelementaryEuclideangeometry basedonHilbert’saxiomscheme.Suchanapproachisawelcomeintroduction totherigorsofaxiomaticthinking,butthebeautyofEuclideangeometrycanget lostinthecarefullywroughttwo-columnproof.Ifmentionedatall,themarvels ofnon-Euclideangeometryarerelegatedtoafootnote,enrichmentmaterial,ora “cultural”essay.Thissituationisalsothecaseinmostcurrentintroductionsto differentialgeometry.Themodernsubjectturnsonproblemsthathaveemerged fromthenewfoundationsthatarefarremovedfromtheancientrootsofgeometry. Whenweteachthenewandcutoffthepast,studentsarelefttofindtheirown waystoameaningofthewordgeometryindifferentialgeometry,orfailingthat,to identifytheiractivityassomethingdifferentandunconnected. ThisbookisanattempttocarrythereaderfromthefamiliarEuclidtothestate ofdevelopmentofdifferentialgeometryatthebeginningofthetwentiethcentury. Onenarrowthreadthatrunsthroughthislargehistoricalperiodisthesearchfora proofofEuclid’sPostulateV,theParallelPostulate,andtheeventualemergence of a new and non-Euclidean geometry. In the course of spinning this tale, another theme enters – the identification of properties of a surface that are intrinsic, that is, independent of the manner in which the surface is embedded in space. This idea, introduced by Gauss, provides the analytic key to properties that are really geometric, opening new realms to explore. Thebookiswritteninsonata-allegroform.PartAopenswithaprelude—asmall and orienting dose of spherical geometry, whose generalizations provide impor-
Recommended publications
  • A Law and Order Question
    ALawandorder Relation preserving maps. Symmetric relations, asymmetric relations, and antisymmetry. The Cartesian product and the Venn diagram. Euler circles, power sets, partitioning or fibering. A-1 Law and order: Cartesian product, power sets In daily life, we make comparisons of type ... is higher than ... is smarter than ... is faster than .... Indeed, we are dealing with order. Mathematically speaking, order is a binary relation of type −1 xR1y : x<y (smaller than) , xR3y : x>y (larger than, R3 = R ) , 1 (A.1) ≤ ≥ −1 xR2y : x y (smaller-equal) , xR4y : x y (larger-equal, R4 = R2 ) . Example A.1 (Real numbers). x and y, for instance, can be real numbers: x, y ∈ R. End of Example. Question: “What is a relation?” Answer: “Let us explain the term relation in the frame of the following example.” Question. Example A.2 (Cartesian product). Define the left set A = {a1,a2,a3} as the set of balls in a left basket, and {a1,a2,a3} = {red,green,blue}. In contrast, the right set B = {b1,b2} as the set of balls in a right basket, and {b1,b2} = {yellow,pink}. Sequentically, we take a ball from the left basket as well as from the right basket such that we are led to the combinations A × B = (a1,b1) , (a1,b2) , (a2,b1) , (a2,b2) , (a3,b1) , (a3,b2) , (A.2) A × B = (red,yellow) , (red,pink) , (green,yellow) , (green,pink) , (blue,yellow) , (green,pink) . (A.3) End of Example. Definition A.1 (Reflexive partial order). Let M be a non-empty set. The binary relation R2 on M is called reflexive partial order if for all x, y, z ∈ M the following three conditions are fulfilled: (i) x ≤ x (reflexivity) , (ii) if x ≤ y and y ≤ x,thenx = y (antisymmetry) , (A.4) (iii) if x ≤ y and y ≤ z,thenx ≤ z (transitivity) .
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 1 Geometry, Student Text and Homework Helper 11/7/2016
    Geometry, Student Text and Homework Helper Page 1 of 1 Skip Directly to Table of Contents | Skip Directly to Main Content Change text size Show/Hide TOC Page Unit 1 Logical Arguments and Constructions; Proof and Congruence > Topic 3 Parallel and Perpendicular Lines > 3-5 Parallel Lines and Triangles 3-5 Parallel Lines and Triangles Teks Focus TEKS (6)(D) Verify theorems about the relationships in triangles, including proof of the Pythagorean Theorem, the sum of interior angles, base angles of isosceles triangles, midsegments, and medians, and apply these relationships to solve problems. TEKS (1)(F) Analyze mathematical relationships to connect and communicate mathematical ideas. Additional TEKS (1)(G) Vocabulary • Auxiliary line – a line that you add to a diagram to help explain relationships in proofs • Exterior angle of a polygon – an angle formed by a side and an extension of an adjacent side • Remote interior angles – the two nonadjacent interior angles corresponding to each exterior angle of a triangle • Analyze – closely examine objects, ideas, or relationships to learn more about their nature ESSENTIAL UNDERSTANDING The sum of the angle measures of a triangle is always the same. take note Postulate 3-2 Parallel Postulate Through a point not on a line, there is one and only one line parallel to the given line. There is exactly one line through P parallel to ℓ. take note Theorem 3-11 Triangle Angle-Sum Theorem The sum of the measures of the angles of a triangle is 180. m∠A + m∠B + m∠C = 180 For a proof of Theorem 3-11, see Problem 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutral Geometry
    Neutral geometry And then we add Euclid’s parallel postulate Saccheri’s dilemma Options are: Summit angles are right Wants Summit angles are obtuse Was able to rule out, and we’ll see how Summit angles are acute The hypothesis of the acute angle is absolutely false, because it is repugnant to the nature of the straight line! Rule out obtuse angles: If we knew that a quadrilateral can’t have the sum of interior angles bigger than 360, we’d be fine. We’d know that if we knew that a triangle can’t have the sum of interior angles bigger than 180. Hold on! Isn’t the sum of the interior angles of a triangle EXACTLY180? Theorem: Angle sum of any triangle is less than or equal to 180º Suppose there is a triangle with angle sum greater than 180º, say anglfle sum of ABC i s 180º + p, w here p> 0. Goal: Construct a triangle that has the same angle sum, but one of its angles is smaller than p. Why is that enough? We would have that the remaining two angles add up to more than 180º: can that happen? Show that any two angles in a triangle add up to less than 180º. What do we know if we don’t have Para lle l Pos tul at e??? Alternate Interior Angle Theorem: If two lines cut by a transversal have a pair of congruent alternate interior angles, then the two lines are parallel. Converse of AIA Converse of AIA theorem: If two lines are parallel then the aliilblternate interior angles cut by a transversa l are congruent.
    [Show full text]
  • Geometry ­ Ch 5 ­ Exterior Angles & Triangle Inequality December 01, 2014
    Geometry ­ Ch 5 ­ Exterior Angles & Triangle Inequality December 01, 2014 The “Three Possibilities” Property: either a>b, a=b, or a<b The Transitive Property: If a>b and b>c, then a>c The Addition Property: If a>b, then a+c>b+c The Subtraction Property: If a>b, then a‐c>b‐c The Multiplication Property: If a>b and c>0, then ac>bc The Division Property: If a>b and c>0, then a/c>b/c The Addition Theorem of Inequality: If a>b and c>d, then a+c>b+d The “Whole Greater than Part” Theorem: If a>0, b>0, and a+b=c, then c>a and c>b Def: An exterior angle of a triangle is an angle that forms a linear pair with an angle of the triangle. A In ∆ABC, exterior ∠2 forms a linear pair with ∠ACB. The other two angles of the triangle, ∠1 (∠B) and ∠A are called remote interior angles with respect to ∠2. 1 2 B C Theorem 12: The Exterior Angle Theorem An Exterior angle of a triangle is greater than either remote interior angle. Find each of the following sums. 3 4 26. ∠1+∠2+∠3+∠4 2 1 6 7 5 8 27. ∠1+∠2+∠3+∠4+∠5+∠6+∠7+ 9 12 ∠8+∠9+∠10+∠11+∠12 11 10 28. ∠1+∠5+∠9 31. What does the result in exercise 30 indicate about the sum of the exterior 29. ∠3+∠7+∠11 angles of a triangle? 30. ∠2+∠4+∠6+∠8+∠10+∠12 1 Geometry ­ Ch 5 ­ Exterior Angles & Triangle Inequality December 01, 2014 After proving the Exterior Angle Theorem, Euclid proved that, in any triangle, the sum of any two angles is less than 180°.
    [Show full text]
  • M2.1 - Transformation Geometry
    RHODES UNIVERSITY Grahamstown 6140, South Africa Lecture Notes CCR M2.1 - Transformation Geometry Claudiu C. Remsing DEPT. of MATHEMATICS (Pure and Applied) 2006 ‘Beauty is truth, truth beauty’ – that is all Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know. John Keats Imagination is more important than knowledge. Albert Einstein Do not just pay attention to the words; Instead pay attention to meaning behind the words. But, do not just pay attention to meanings behind the words; Instead pay attention to your deep experience of those meanings. Tenzin Gyatso, The 14th Dalai Lama Where there is matter, there is geometry. Johannes Kepler Geometry is the art of good reasoning from poorly drawn figures. Anonymous What is a geometry ? The question [...] is metamathematical rather than mathematical, and consequently mathematicians of unquestioned competence may (and, indeed, do) differ in the answer they give to it. Even among those mathematicians called geometers there is no generally accepted definition of the term. It has been observed that the abstract, postulational method that has permeated nearly all parts of modern mathematics makes it difficult, if not meaningless, to mark with precision the boundary of that mathematical domain which should be called geometry. To some, geometry is not so much a subject as it is a point of view – a way of loking at a subject – so that geometry is the mathematics that a geometer does ! To others, geometry is a language that provides a very useful and suggestive means of discussing almost every part of mathematics (just as, in former days, French was the language of diplomacy); and there are, doubtless, some mathematicians who find such a query without any real significance and who, consequently, will disdain to vouchsafe any an- swer at all to it.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 Euclidean Geometry
    Chapter 4 Euclidean Geometry Based on previous 15 axioms, The parallel postulate for Euclidean geometry is added in this chapter. 4.1 Euclidean Parallelism, Existence of Rectangles De¯nition 4.1 Two distinct lines ` and m are said to be parallel ( and we write `km) i® they lie in the same plane and do not meet. Terminologies: 1. Transversal: a line intersecting two other lines. 2. Alternate interior angles 3. Corresponding angles 4. Interior angles on the same side of transversal 56 Yi Wang Chapter 4. Euclidean Geometry 57 Theorem 4.2 (Parallelism in absolute geometry) If two lines in the same plane are cut by a transversal to that a pair of alternate interior angles are congruent, the lines are parallel. Remark: Although this theorem involves parallel lines, it does not use the parallel postulate and is valid in absolute geometry. Proof: Assume to the contrary that the two lines meet, then use Exterior Angle Inequality to draw a contradiction. 2 The converse of above theorem is the Euclidean Parallel Postulate. Euclid's Fifth Postulate of Parallels If two lines in the same plane are cut by a transversal so that the sum of the measures of a pair of interior angles on the same side of the transversal is less than 180, the lines will meet on that side of the transversal. In e®ect, this says If m\1 + m\2 6= 180; then ` is not parallel to m Yi Wang Chapter 4. Euclidean Geometry 58 It's contrapositive is If `km; then m\1 + m\2 = 180( or m\2 = m\3): Three possible notions of parallelism Consider in a single ¯xed plane a line ` and a point P not on it.
    [Show full text]
  • MA3D9: Geometry of Curves and Surfaces
    Geometry of Curves and Surfaces Weiyi Zhang Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick November 20, 2020 2 Contents 1 Curves 5 1.1 Course description . .5 1.1.1 A bit preparation: Differentiation . .6 1.2 Methods of describing a curve . .8 1.2.1 Fixed coordinates . .8 1.2.2 Moving frames: parametrized curves . .8 1.2.3 Intrinsic way(coordinate free) . .9 n 1.3 Curves in R : Arclength Parametrization . 11 1.4 Curvature . 13 1.5 Orthonormal frame: Frenet-Serret equations . 16 1.6 Plane curves . 18 1.7 More results for space curves . 20 1.7.1 Taylor expansion of a curve . 21 1.7.2 Fundamental Theorem of the local theory of curves . 21 1.8 Isoperimetric Inequality . 23 1.9 The Four Vertex Theorem . 25 3 2 Surfaces in R 29 2.1 Definitions and Examples . 29 2.1.1 Compact surfaces . 32 2.1.2 Level sets . 33 2.2 The First Fundamental Form . 34 2.3 Length, Angle, Area . 35 2.3.1 Length: Isometry . 36 2.3.2 Angle: conformal . 37 2.3.3 Area: equiareal . 37 2.4 The Second Fundamental Form . 38 2.4.1 Normals and orientability . 39 2.4.2 Gauss map and second fundamental form . 40 2.5 Curvatures . 42 2.5.1 Definitions and first properties . 42 2.5.2 Calculation of Gaussian and mean curvatures . 45 2.5.3 Principal curvatures . 47 3 4 CONTENTS 2.6 Gauss's Theorema Egregium . 49 2.6.1 Compatibility equations . 52 2.6.2 Gaussian curvature for special cases .
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Theorems of Euclidean Geometry
    Basic Theorems of Euclidean Geometry We finally adopt the Euclidean Parallel Postulate and explore geometry under this assumption. The result is Euclidean Geometry and its major results are similarity, the Pythagorean Theorem, and trigonometry, although there is of course much more. Axiom (The Euclidean Parallel Postulate): For every line l and for every point P that does not lie on l, there is exactly one line m such that P lies on m and m is parallel to l. We now have as theorems all those statements that we proved equivalent to EPP earlier, including: 1. If two parallel lines are cut by a transversal, alternate interior angles are congruent. 2. (Euclid’s Postulate V) If two lines in the same plane are cut by a transversal so that the sum of the measures of a pair of interior angles on the same side of the transversal is less than 180, then the lines will meet on that side of the transversal. 3. (Proclus’s Axiom) A third line intersecting one of two parallel lines intersects the other. 4. A line perpendicular to one of two parallel lines is perpendicular to the other. 5. The perpendicular bisectors of the sides of a triangle are concurrent. 6. There exists a circle passing through any three noncollinear points. 7. (Angle Sum Postulate) The sum of measures of the angles of a triangle is 180. 8. There exists one triangle such that the sum of measures of the angles is 180. 9. There exists a rectangle. 10. There exist two lines l and m such that l is equidistant from m.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutral Geometry
    NEUTRAL GEOMETRY If only it could be proved ... that "there is a Triangle whose angles are together not less than two right angles"! But alas, that is an ignis fatuus that has never yet been caught! c. L. DODGSON (LEWIS CARROLL) GEOMETRY WITHOUT THE PARALLELL AXIOM In the exercises of the previous chapter you gained experience in proving some elementary results from Hilbert's axioms. Many of these results were taken for granted by Euclid. You can see that filling in the gaps and rigorously proving every detail is a long task. In any case, we must show that Euclid's postulates are consequences of Hilbert's. We have seen that Euclid's first postulate is the same as Hilbert's Axiom 1-1. In our new language, Euclid's second postulate says the following: given segments AB and CD, there exists a point E such that A * B * E and CD == BE. This follows immediately from Hilbert's Axiom C-1 applied to the ray emanating from B opposite to -+ . BA (see Figure 4.1). The third postulate of Euclid becomes a definition in Hilbert's system. The circle with center 0 and radius OA is defined as the set of all points P such that OP is congruent to OA. Axiom C-1 then guaran­ tees that on every ray emanating from 0 there exists such a point P. The fourth postulate of Euclid-all right angles are congruent­ becomes a theorem in Hilbert's system, as was shown in Proposition 3.23. 116 III Neutral Geometry c o • • • • • FIGURE 4.1 A B E Euclid's parallel postulate is discussed later in this chapter.
    [Show full text]
  • Graph Minor from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Contents
    Graph minor From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Contents 1 2 × 2 real matrices 1 1.1 Profile ................................................. 1 1.2 Equi-areal mapping .......................................... 2 1.3 Functions of 2 × 2 real matrices .................................... 2 1.4 2 × 2 real matrices as complex numbers ............................... 3 1.5 References ............................................... 4 2 Abelian group 5 2.1 Definition ............................................... 5 2.2 Facts ................................................. 5 2.2.1 Notation ........................................... 5 2.2.2 Multiplication table ...................................... 6 2.3 Examples ............................................... 6 2.4 Historical remarks .......................................... 6 2.5 Properties ............................................... 6 2.6 Finite abelian groups ......................................... 7 2.6.1 Classification ......................................... 7 2.6.2 Automorphisms ....................................... 7 2.7 Infinite abelian groups ........................................ 8 2.7.1 Torsion groups ........................................ 9 2.7.2 Torsion-free and mixed groups ................................ 9 2.7.3 Invariants and classification .................................. 9 2.7.4 Additive groups of rings ................................... 9 2.8 Relation to other mathematical topics ................................. 10 2.9 A note on the typography ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Equiareal Shape-From-Template
    Noname manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Equiareal Shape-from-Template David Casillas-Perez · Daniel Pizarro · David Fuentes-Jimenez · Manuel Mazo · Adrien Bartoli Received: date / Accepted: date Abstract This paper studies the 3D reconstruction of give reconstruction results with both synthetic and real a deformable surface from a single image and a reference examples. surface, known as the template. This problem is known as Shape-from-Template and has been recently shown to be well-posed for isometric deformations, for which 1 Introduction the surface bends without altering geodesics. This pa- per studies the case of equiareal deformations. They The reconstruction of 3D objects from images is an are elastic deformations where the local area is pre- important goal in Computer Vision with numerous served and thus include isometry as a special case. Elas- scientific and engineering applications. Over the last tic deformations have been studied before in Shape- few decades, the reconstruction of rigid objects has from-Template, yet no theoretical results were given on been thoroughly studied and solved by Structure-from- the existence or uniqueness of solutions. The equiareal Motion (SfM) [23], which uses multiple 2D images of model is much more widely applicable than isome- the same scene. Rigidity ensures the problem's well- try. This paper brings Monge's theory, widely used for posedness in the general case, which means that only studying the solutions of non-linear first-order PDEs, one solution is obtained up to scale. to the field of 3D reconstruction. It uses this theory to This paper studies the reconstruction of objects un- establish a theoretical framework for equiareal Shape- dergoing deformations where SfM solutions cannot be from-Template and answers the important question of applied.
    [Show full text]
  • Erik W. Grafarend Friedrich W. Krumm Map Projections Erik W
    Erik W. Grafarend Friedrich W. Krumm Map Projections Erik W. Grafarend Friedrich W. Krumm Map Projections Cartographic Information Systems With 230 Figures 123 Professor Dr. Erik W. Grafarend Universität Stuttgart Institute of Geodesy Geschwister-Scholl-Str. 24 D 70174 Stuttgart Germany E-mail: [email protected] Dr. Friedrich W. Krumm Universität Stuttgart Institute of Geodesy Geschwister-Scholl-Str. 24 D 70174 Stuttgart Germany E-mail: [email protected] Library of Congress Control Number: 2006929531 ISBN-10 3-540-36701-2 Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York ISBN-13 978-3-540-36701-7 Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilm or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the German Copyright Law of September 9, 1965, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer-Verlag. Violations are liable to prosecution under the German Copyright Law. Springer is a part of Springer Science+BusinessScience+Business Media Springeronline.com © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006 Printed in Germany The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. Cover design: E. Kirchner, Heidelberg Design, layout, and software manuscript by Dr.
    [Show full text]