Early Life of Mark Antony Kendra Bumpus

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Early Life of Mark Antony Kendra Bumpus Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC Honors Theses University Honors Program 5-2004 Early Life of Mark Antony Kendra Bumpus Follow this and additional works at: http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/uhp_theses Recommended Citation Bumpus, Kendra, "Early Life of Mark Antony" (2004). Honors Theses. Paper 264. This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the University Honors Program at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. J/ I-i :.r.•J • • Early life of Mark Antony • • • • • By Kendra Bumpus _ • • • • • • • Honors T'hesis • Submitted May 7, 2004 • • • • • rJ It • Early Life of Mark Antony • • Most people have heard of Mark Antony. Public opinion of him is that he was merely • Kleopatra's doomed lover and the man who failed to rule Rome after Julius Caesar died. These • are all true statements, but these statements do not reflect how Mark Antony came to be in these • positions. They do not reflect his growth from a drunkard teenager to the second in command of • Julius Caesar, undeniably the most powerful man in the world in his time. Mark Antony was a • man loved and respected by his soldiers and, though his succession was quick, due to his • personal friendships and contacts, it was not undeserved. Mark Antony came from obscurity and • moved into greatness. • There were several people that influenced Mark Antony and his political career. His • family brought about the possibility of his political life, and politics meant everything in first • century B.C. Rome. His grandfather was the first Antonius to have any contact with the Caesars, • something they probably did not even realize would be a turning point for Antony. Both the • houses of Mark Antony's family, the Antonii and the Julii, acquired such political power and • reputation that Antony was born into a powerful, and burdensome, role full of great expectations. • His political life "was a foregone conclusion,,,1 the same can be said for his military career, • though it did start off later in his life than other prominent figures. Antony would know political • greatness and political suicide through his family's dealings. He would learn all the lessons of • Roman politics before he ever stepped his foot in the Senate, or on any other political ground. • He would hear and see the tales of his family, would find the common themes, and would learn • from the mistakes others before him made. • • I Huzar, Eleanor Goltz. Mark Antony: A Biography. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 1978; p 12 • • • Bumpus 2 • One problem, which was a common theme for the Antonii, would be the involvement of • Cicero in his life. Another influential figure, which also had a common thread, would be Julius • Caesar. Another major role to include would be pirates, who would be a thorn in the side for one • member and the downfall of another of Antony's family. Antony would not make the same • mistakes his ancestors did, however; and he would not forget these people, as he honored them • publicly and in religious rites2 These ancestors established his political value, his value as an • ally, and the price to pay with him as an enemy. They gave him allies in "both conservative and • popular camps.,,3 They gave him his start in both life and politics. • • Marcus Antonius- the grandfather of Mark Antony • • Mark Antony came from a fairly influential family, though the men that were to act as his • role models were not very good politically or morally. Antony's real saving grace was the • memory of his grandfather from his father's side, Marcus Antonius, whose traditions and • 4 • commitments would leave their mark upon Antony throughout his life and career. Marcus • Antonius was born in 143 B.C., and led a rather good life, politically speaking.s Antonius was an • orator and could easily talk himself out of many situations, which he often did. He was highly • respected and had a rather bright future. He even taught Cicero, whom Antony would later kill, • in part, due to Cicero's hand in the death of his step-father among other reasons (see below, pI I). • It appears Cicero cared only for the eldest Antonius, though. In his Philippics, Cicero called the • • 2 Huzar, p 12 • 3 Huzar, p 22 , Huzar, p 13 • 5 Huzar, p 13 • • • Bumpus 3 6 J • day of his death, acerbissimum eius supremum diem , all the while criticizing his grandson • Antonius also had ties with Julius Caesar; it is this familial tie, one of many, with Caesar that • probably originally helped the young Antony rise in the ranks. Antonius was a censor, as wells. • In 113 and 112 B.c. Marcus Antonius was in Cilicia,9 fighting the pirate problem, which • his son would later do. The pirates were a great threat to the Romans. The Romans, at this time, • were using the sea as a major trade route, particularly to Egypt. This was due to Egypt producing • massive amounts ofgrain, which the Romans would need to feed their people. The pirates • compromised this trade and could have stolen much Roman revenue if they were not dealt with • properly. The Senate gave this task to Antonius; this shows how highly the senate regarded • • Marcus Antonius. • In 102 B.C., Antonius was praetor, giving him similar authority to a consul 10, governing • the Cilician coast, and was allotted a special commission for fighting against the pirates. II This • seems odd, as Antonius first attacked the pirates was ten years before, as mentioned above. • Surely the fact that he had been fighting pirates for the last ten years would have indicated his • inability to beat them. Perhaps this was the reason Antonius received "Rome's first special • command which included authority over other provincial governors: a power which later grew to • the imperium maius held by generals such as his grandson over all other commanders". 12 • Imperium maius is the "greater authority," or, in Antonius' case, more along the lines of • authority to deal with a community and the dealings of individuals in that community. 13 This • would be a groundbreaking event, as others would go on to have a power similar to this, such as • 6 Cicero, Philippics. 1.34 7 Cicero, Philippics. 1.34 • 8 Southern, Pal. Mark Antony. Stroud: Tempus Publishing Limited, 1998; p 12 9 Southern, p 12 • JO Oxford Classical Dictionary, p 1240 • II Huzar, p 13 12 Huzar, p 13 • 13 OCD, p 751 and 752 • • • Bumpus 4 • Tiberius (given by the emperor Augustus) and Germanicus (which he held in the east and was • given by Tiberius). Antonius seems to have had the same trouble Antony's other relatives, as he • later attempted to clear the Mediterranean of pirates by attacking Spain and Sicily and failed. 14 • The pirates were not eliminated, but were contained for the moment. • As a result of this, in December of 100 B.C., he was awarded a triumph,15 a procession • which would have given Antonius not only money but public fame, 16 which included an • allotment so a statue of him could be erected; and he was allowed to decorate the Rostra in l 18 • Rome. ? This is a tradition that started in 338 B.C. This not only allowed Antonius the public • fame mentioned above, it would have made him a household name. It also would have made him • a very influential person. The masses would have witnessed this parade, and they would have • adored Antonius for a time. During this time is when Antonius could have been made even more • influential by the masses and would have been more useful to other politicians with this • connection. In Rome, whoever controlled the love of the masses controlled Rome. • Marcus Antonius is most noteworthy because he was the first Antonius to reach the • 19 • consulship in 99 B.C. The consulship in Rome was the highest office one could attain. It was a • position which required two people, and those two people could rule as a king. 2o However, Rome • did not have kings any more, and Romans were fearful of the term, rex, almost as if it was a • curse on their society. Antonius had reached the highest point in Roman politics; his family • would surely profit from this. • • 14 Huzar, p 16 . • 15 Plutarch, Pompey, Ch 24.6 16 OCD, P 1554 • 17 Huzar, p 14 • 18 OCD, P 1336 19 Huzar, p 14 • 20 OCD, P 383-384 • • • Bumpus 5 • After his consulship, he became one ofthe censors in 97. Typically a censor was in • charge of not only the census, or counting how many Roman citizens were in the province, but • also they were responsible for the morals ofthe people in this province. Also, they could place a • censure, or a mark, upon a person, in effect, making this person unable to vote, but still be held • responsible for taxes and a nota, or a mark excluding one from the Senate?1 This was most • prestigious, as not many senators achieved such a high status22 Censors were elected every five • years. • In 90 B.C. Antonius was accused oftreason on an invalid charge, but, as censor, he did • follow Marius' policies which allocated generous grants of citizenship to Italians. This left a • legacy of gratitude for Antonius and his family throughout Italy, which Antony would be able to • use to his advantage. "During these years ofprominence, Antonius also received the religious • office of augur for life,,23 This appointment apparently did not mean too much.
Recommended publications
  • The Fall of the Roman Republic
    The Fall of the Roman Republic Paul Waring November 6, 2017 Introduction In 44 BC,1 the assassination of Julius Caesar at the hands of a group of disgruntled senators resulted in a power vacuum at the heart of the Roman Republic. Two men, Antony and Octavian, looked set to grasp the mantle of power, and initially they worked closely together to divide up the republic. The arrangement eventually failed though, and plunged Rome into yet another conflict. In this discussion we will be focusing on the lives of Antony and Octavian (later Augustus) and their role in the fall of the Roman Republic, and its transition into an Empire run by one man instead of the Senate. We will examine their early lives and rise to power separately, and then join the two stories together at the point of the Second Triumvirate, an official arrangement between the two men to work together and divide up Rome’s possessions. From there we will take the narrative up until the point of the Second Settlement of Augustus (23), at which point Augustus was secure as the first emperor of Rome, although he was careful not to use that title. The intensity of activity during the period under discussion (c. 44 - 23) and the volume of surviving literary and archaeological material means that we will either mention briefly or skip altogether some of the events which occurred and the people involved. A substantial amount of further reading, both in ancient sources and modern texts, is provided for those who wish to examine the period in more detail.
    [Show full text]
  • Name Date of Death Date of Paper Place of Burial
    Name Date of Death Date of Paper Place of Burial Haack, Charles A. Graves 30 Nov 1907 Belvidere Cemetery Haack, Charles R. 12 Mar 1922 Haack, Edward J. 18 Nov 1938 Belvidere Haack, John 29 May 1924 Belvidere Cemetery Haack, Maria Johana Martens 23 May 1921; pg. 6 Belvidere Cemetery Haack, Theodore C. 26 Aug 1912 Belvidere Cemetery Haacker, Mrs. Anna 8 Sep 1938 Union Cemetery Haafe, William 21 Nov 1928 Kenosha, WI Haag, Jacob 20 Feb 1940 Belvidere Cemetery Haas, Edna A. 23 Sep 1981 Haas, Nancy J. 1 Jan 1996 Shirland Cemetery Haase, Dorothy D. 3 Nov 1987 Marengo City Cemetery Haase, Henry 10 Jan 1896 Haase, Nellie 10 Apr 1981 Sunset Memorial Gardens Haase, William (See: Haafe, William) Haatz, Olga 25 Jun 1930 Cherry Valley Hadebank, Ernest 6 Oct 1941 Habedank, Hanna 8 Oct 1918 15 Oct 1918 Belvidere Cemetery Habedank, Richard 23 Mar 1930 Belvidere Cemetery Habedank, Sophie 13 Jul 1942 14 Jul 1942 Habedonk, H. G. 5 Jul 1900 Indiana Haber, Joyce M. 11 Nov 2000 Dubuque, IA Haberdank, Johanna 8 Jan 1906 Belvidere Cemetery Habina, Anthony C. 22 May 1995 Hable, Edward L. 12 Sep 1988 20 Sep 1988 Sun City West, AZ Hable, Joseph A. 28 Dec 1991 Pittsville, WI Hable, Leonard F. 30 Sep 2007 St. Mary’s Cemetery Hable, Opal E. 16 Jul 1995 Hachmann, Alice M. 23 Dec 2012 RR Star 25, 26 Dec 2012 Dubuque, IA Hack, Earl R. 14 Jul 1990 Lasalle, IL Hack, baby of George 20 Jan 1903 Chicago Hackenback, Henry 29 Mar 1936 Chicago Hacker, John 7 May 1933 Marengo Cemetery Hacker, Werner H.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roman Province of Judea: a Historical Overview
    BYU Studies Quarterly Volume 36 Issue 3 Article 23 7-1-1996 The Roman Province of Judea: A Historical Overview John F. Hall Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byusq Part of the Mormon Studies Commons, and the Religious Education Commons Recommended Citation Hall, John F. (1996) "The Roman Province of Judea: A Historical Overview," BYU Studies Quarterly: Vol. 36 : Iss. 3 , Article 23. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byusq/vol36/iss3/23 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in BYU Studies Quarterly by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hall: The Roman Province of Judea: A Historical Overview p d tffieffiAinelixnealxAIX romansixulalealliki glnfin ns i u1uaihiihlanilni judeatairstfsuuctfa Published by BYU ScholarsArchive, 1996 1 BYU Studies Quarterly, Vol. 36, Iss. 3 [1996], Art. 23 the roman province judeaofiudeaofofjudea A historical overview john E hall the comingcoining of rome to judea romes acquisition ofofjudeajudea and subsequent involvement in the affairs of that long troubled area came about in largely indirect fashion for centuries judea had been under the control of the hel- lenilenisticstic greek monarchy centered in syria and known as the seleu- cid empire one of the successor states to the far greater empire of alexander the great who conquered the vast reaches of the persian empire toward the end of the fourth century
    [Show full text]
  • Excessive Public Grief at the Death of Germanicus in AD 19
    Excessive Public Grief at the Death of Germanicus in AD 19 The death in AD 19 of Tiberius’s adopted son, Germanicus Julius Caesar, threw the Roman Empire into a rarely seen and highly undignified grief, which our sources probably exaggerate in order to demonstrate the unpopularity of the emperor Tiberius. Tacitus and Suetonius document outpours of mass grief among the common people who had no close association or connection with Germanicus but regarded him as the last hope of honor, justice, and decency; the audience old enough to remember 1968 will see distinct parallels. Although Tacitus Ann. 2.73 likens Germanicus’s career, achievements, and charisma to Alexander the Great, the public reaction to his death more closely resembles that of his ancestor by triple adoption, the Divine Julius, including a brief civil war and also that of Clodius in 52 BC. Neither were normal by any stretch of the imagination. The hysteria that followed the news of the death of Germanicus, the joy at a false report of his survival, and the renewed frenzy upon his verified death cast aside all normal standards of grief, especially considering the Roman reputation for stoic perseverance in the face of hardship. Tiberius attempted to display a stoic response (Tacitus says to conceal his joy) and lead by example, but other Romans, wholly ignoring his role model, dropped any prospect of sang froid and behaved if the death of Germanicus equated the downfall of the state. Their reaction contrasts entirely with the composure and ritual at funerals of other beloved statesmen – including Augustus in AD 14, which included hired mourners and the show of grief.
    [Show full text]
  • Pompey, the Great Husband
    Michael Jaffee Patterson Independent Project 2/1/13 Pompey, the Great Husband Abstract: Pompey the Great’s traditional narrative of one-dimensionally striving for power ignores the possibility of the affairs of his private life influencing the actions of his political career. This paper gives emphasis to Pompey’s familial relationships as a motivating factor beyond raw ambition to establish a non-teleological history to explain the events of his life. Most notably, Pompey’s opposition to the special command of the Lex Gabinia emphasizes the incompatibility for success in both the public and private life and Pompey’s preference for the later. Pompey’s disposition for devotion and care permeates the boundary between the public and private to reveal that the happenings of his life outside the forum defined his actions within. 1 “Pompey was free from almost every fault, unless it be considered one of the greatest faults for a man to chafe at seeing anyone his equal in dignity in a free state, the mistress of the world, where he should justly regard all citizens as his equals,” (Velleius Historiae Romanae 2.29.4). The annals of history have not been kind to Pompey. Characterized by the unbridled ambition attributed as his impetus for pursuing the civil war, Pompey is one of history’s most one-dimensional characters. This teleological explanation of Pompey’s history oversimplifies the entirety of his life as solely motivated by a desire to dominate the Roman state. However, a closer examination of the events surrounding the passage of the Lex Gabinia contradicts this traditional portrayal.
    [Show full text]
  • Mark Antony's Oration from Julius Caesar
    NAME: ______________________________________ Mark Antony’s Oration from Julius Caesar In William Shakespeare’s play, Julius Caesar, Caesar has been assassinated in front of the Senate by a group of Roman offi cials, including his friend, Brutus. After the murder, Brutus speaks to the gathered crowd. He convinces them that the conspirators killed Caesar to save Rome. Mark Antony is another Roman offi cial and friend to Caesar who did not participate in the murder. Antony promises Brutus that he will not blame the conspirators if he is allowed to make a speech also. Act III Scene II Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears; When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept: I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him. Ambition should be made of sterner stuff: The evil that men do lives after them; Yet Brutus says he was ambitious; The good is oft interred with their bones: And Brutus is an honourable man. So let it be with Caesar. The noble Brutus You all did see that on the Lupercal Hath told you Caesar was ambitious: I thrice presented him a kingly crown, If it were so, it was a grievous fault; Which he did thrice refuse: was this ambition? And grievously hath Caesar answer’d it. Yet Brutus says he was ambitious; Here, under leave of Brutus and the rest,— And, sure, he is an honourable man. For Brutus is an honourable man; I speak not to disprove what Brutus spoke, So are they all, all honorable men,— But here I am to speak what I do know.
    [Show full text]
  • Augustus Go to and Log in Using Your School’S Log in Details
    Timelines – Augustus Go to www.worldbookonline.com and log in using your school’s log in details: Log-in ID: Password: Click on Advanced Type in Augustus in Search box Click the article titled Augustus Read the article and answer the questions below. 1. What date was Octavian (Augustus) born? ___________________________________________________________________________ 2. In which year did Octavian take the name Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus? ___________________________________________________________________________ 3. Octavian defeated Mark Antony, who had taken control of Rome following Caesar’s death, in which year? ___________________________________________________________________________ 4. Octavian and Mark Antony formed a political alliance, known as the Second Triumvirate, with Markus Aemilius Lepidus (chief priest of Rome). In which year were Marcus Junius Brutus and Gaius Cassius Longinus, Caesar’s chief assassins, defeated at Philippi in Macedonia? ___________________________________________________________________________ 5. What year was another threat, Sextus Pompey (son of Pompey the Great), defeated by Antony and Octavian? ___________________________________________________________________________ 6. In what year did the Triumvirate disintegrate? ___________________________________________________________________________ 7. In what year did Mark Antony and Cleopatra (Queen of Egypt) become lovers? ___________________________________________________________________________ 8. In what year did Octavian go to war against
    [Show full text]
  • Domitian's Arae Incendii Neroniani in New Flavian Rome
    Rising from the Ashes: Domitian’s Arae Incendii Neroniani in New Flavian Rome Lea K. Cline In the August 1888 edition of the Notizie degli Scavi, profes- on a base of two steps; it is a long, solid rectangle, 6.25 m sors Guliermo Gatti and Rodolfo Lanciani announced the deep, 3.25 m wide, and 1.26 m high (lacking its crown). rediscovery of a Domitianic altar on the Quirinal hill during These dimensions make it the second largest public altar to the construction of the Casa Reale (Figures 1 and 2).1 This survive in the ancient capital. Built of travertine and revet- altar, found in situ on the southeast side of the Alta Semita ted in marble, this altar lacks sculptural decoration. Only its (an important northern thoroughfare) adjacent to the church inscription identifies it as an Ara Incendii Neroniani, an altar of San Andrea al Quirinale, was not unknown to scholars.2 erected in fulfillment of a vow made after the great fire of The site was discovered, but not excavated, in 1644 when Nero (A.D. 64).7 Pope Urban VIII (Maffeo Barberini) and Gianlorenzo Bernini Archaeological evidence attests to two other altars, laid the foundations of San Andrea al Quirinale; at that time, bearing identical inscriptions, excavated in the sixteenth the inscription was removed to the Vatican, and then the and seventeenth centuries; the Ara Incendii Neroniani found altar was essentially forgotten.3 Lanciani’s notes from May on the Quirinal was the last of the three to be discovered.8 22, 1889, describe a fairly intact structure—a travertine block Little is known of the two other altars; one, presumably altar with remnants of a marble base molding on two sides.4 found on the Vatican plain, was reportedly used as building Although the altar’s inscription was not in situ, Lanciani refers material for the basilica of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Judges in the Classroom the Republic of Rome V. Marcus Brutus
    Judges In The Classroom The Republic of Rome v. Marcus Brutus Mock Trial Source: Written by Margaret Fisher. Staff at the Washington State Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) edited the lesson. For more information, contact AOC Court Services, 1206 Quince Street SE, PO Box 41170, Olympia, WA 98504-1170. For an electronic copy of this lesson, or to view other lesson plans, visit Educational Resources on the Washington Courts Web site at: www.courts.wa.gov/education/. Objectives: 1. Students will conduct a mock trial, follow the sequence of steps in a trial, and employ good techniques for each role. 2. Students will make complex, prepared oral presentations as attorneys and witnesses. 3. Students will demonstrate skills in listening, rapid critical analysis, and extemporaneous speech. 4. Students will gain an understanding of the rules of evidence and procedure. 5. Students will demonstrate knowledge of the law applicable to the case. Grade Level: Grades 6-8 Time: One class period (approximately 50 minutes) Materials: Mock trial packet for the judge (mock trial agenda, stipulated facts, sworn statements, and evidentiary information as included in this lesson). The teacher will prepare all other materials for students ahead of the trial date. Note: This lesson assumes the class completed a multi-disciplinary unit on mock trial preparation. They studied legal concepts and procedures, analyzed the trial process, reviewed historical issues, and prepared for this specific case. Now, the parties are ready to proceed to trial, with you as the judge. Judges in the Classroom Brutus Mock Trial Mock Trial Agenda Procedures: 1. Begin the class by introducing yourself and setting the students at ease.
    [Show full text]
  • INGO GILDENHARD Cicero, Philippic 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119 Latin Text, Study Aids with Vocabulary, and Commentary CICERO, PHILIPPIC 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119
    INGO GILDENHARD Cicero, Philippic 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119 Latin text, study aids with vocabulary, and commentary CICERO, PHILIPPIC 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119 Cicero, Philippic 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119 Latin text, study aids with vocabulary, and commentary Ingo Gildenhard https://www.openbookpublishers.com © 2018 Ingo Gildenhard The text of this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the text; to adapt the text and to make commercial use of the text providing attribution is made to the author(s), but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work. Attribution should include the following information: Ingo Gildenhard, Cicero, Philippic 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119. Latin Text, Study Aids with Vocabulary, and Commentary. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers, 2018. https://doi. org/10.11647/OBP.0156 Every effort has been made to identify and contact copyright holders and any omission or error will be corrected if notification is made to the publisher. In order to access detailed and updated information on the license, please visit https:// www.openbookpublishers.com/product/845#copyright Further details about CC BY licenses are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/ All external links were active at the time of publication unless otherwise stated and have been archived via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine at https://archive.org/web Digital material and resources associated with this volume are available at https://www.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cultural Creation of Fulvia Flacca Bambula
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 5-2017 The cultural creation of Fulvia Flacca Bambula. Erin Leigh Wotring University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Part of the European History Commons, History of Gender Commons, Intellectual History Commons, Political History Commons, Social History Commons, and the Women's History Commons Recommended Citation Wotring, Erin Leigh, "The cultural creation of Fulvia Flacca Bambula." (2017). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 2691. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/2691 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE CULTURAL CREATION OF FULVIA FLACCA BAMBULA By Erin Leigh Wotring A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of the University of Louisville In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts in History Department of History University of Louisville Louisville, KY May, 2017 Copyright 2017 by Erin Leigh Wotring All rights reserved THE CULTURAL CREATION OF FULVIA FLACCA BAMBULA By Erin Leigh Wotring A Thesis Approved on April 14, 2017 by the following Thesis Committee: Dr. Jennifer Westerfeld, Director Dr. Blake Beattie Dr. Carmen Hardin ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Background Notes
    William Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra Historical Mr. Pogreba Background Helena High School The Roman World in 41 B.C.E. The Roman Republic ❖ The Roman Republic was founded in 509 B.C.E and ended in 27 B.C.E., replaced by the Roman Empire ❖ By 41 B.C.E. the Roman Republic controlled most of the Mediterranean and modern France. ❖ It was ruled by the Senate. Roman General and Politician Julius Caesar • Born to a middle class family in 100 B.C.E. • The greatest general in the history of Rome, he conquered modern France and put Egypt under Roman control. • He was appointed dictator for life in 44 B.C.E. • When he aspired to become King/ Emperor, he was murdered by the Senate on March 15, 44 B.C.E. Aftermath of Caesar’s Death ❖ His friend, Mark Antony, gave a speech over Caesar’s body that made the mob run wild in Rome, causing the assassins to flee. ❖ Eventually, the Roman territories are divided between three rulers in the Triumvirate, who divide the Roman territories between them. The Second Triumvirate ❖ The Roman territories were ruled by three men: ❖ Marcus Antonius (Mark Antony) ❖ Octavian Caesar ❖ Marcus Lepidus ❖ They were threatened by the Parthian Empire and Sextus Pompey Octavian Lepidus Marc Antony 37 B.C.E. Territories of the Second Triumvirate Triumvir of Rome Marc Antony • Born in 83 B.C.E. • General under the command of Julius Caesar, he led the war against those who had killed Caesar. • He was the senior partner of the Trimuvirate, and given the largest territory to control in the East.
    [Show full text]