Jose Carlos Mariategui Social Sciences, Philoso

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Jose Carlos Mariategui Social Sciences, Philoso 1 DECRIPTION OF THE MODULE Items Description of the Module Subject Name Sociology Paper Name Classical Sociological Theory Module Name/Title Latin American Interpretation of Marx: Jose Carlos Mariategui Pre Requisites Social sciences, philosophy, historicism, and Marxism. Objectives The main objective of this paper is to show how Marxism has affected the contextual scenario of Latin American. More specifically the paper is aimed at discussing how Mariategui a socialist thinker uses the views of Karl Marx to air out the problems trapping Peru. Key words Marxism, capitalism feudalism, Latifundization, Socialism, Proleteriat, Bourgeoisie, The Indian, Primitive communism, MODULE STRUCTURE Latin American Interpretation of Marx: Jose Carlos A discuss on socials issues in Latin America in general Mariategui and Peru in Particular using Marxian Principles 2 MARXISM IN LATIN AMERICA AND THEMARXIST VIEWS OF JOSE CARLOS MARIATEGUI 1.1. LATIN AMERICA INTERPRETATION OF KARL MARX Karl Marx had once remarked that the history of every society is hitherto the history of class struggle1. In the Latin American context, class struggle is at the order of the day. The call for liberation has remained and immediate ringtone in the Latin American societies. Since Karl Marx based his materialist conception of History within the context of economic categories2, Latin American thinkers especially Marxists, were also of the opinion that economic factors are responsible for the state of affairs in all Latin American countries. Capitalism was highlighted as a bad system that has kept most of the countries in this part of the word in some very bad condition. The thinkers and socialist Marxist were of the opinion that capitalism has crumbled many of these countries and like Marx, advocated for socialism. Capitalism only favored a few people. By evaluating this system they tilted toward socialism.3 Since the early twentieth century, Marxism was becoming a popular political ideology for most Latin American practitioners who engaged in what Antonio Gramsci calls the war of position on the cultural front.4 The Marxist’s of the early 20th century endeavored to empower the marginalized communities by educating them about the ills of capitalism and feudalism and also offered them an alternative world view i.e. of socialism. Eliminating the capitalist system and its problems, it was necessary for them to practice what Gramsci called the bourgeois ideological Hegemony or the popular acceptance of the fundamental precepts of capitalism5 or what Karl Marx call called the bourgeoisie socialism.6 In the midst of this process, some Latin American activist advocated that genuine education can gradually eradicate the problems faced by the region. Those who took the liberation theology stance, choose to dwell publicly on religion which they realized forms an integral part of the life of people in Latin America. But at the background they condemned the church for they felt has 1 Karl Marx (1954), Communist Manifesto, (Chicago Regney Company), 13 2 . Fagothey (1976), Right and Reason, (U.S.A, The C.V Mosby Company), 379. 3 Sheldon, B. Liss, (1984) Marxist thought in Latin America, (University of Carlifonia Press), 272. 4 Ibid, 272. 5 Ibid272 6 Communist Manifesto, 71 3 historically religion and especially the church in many ways favoured capitalism. In the midst of these free opinions, there was a general consensus reached by most American Marxist. In the first place all Latin American Marxist asserted that capitalism and its colonial, neo-colonial and imperialist manifestation basically harms society and would be eventually rejected by the masses at some stage.7 Since then, Latin American socialists have continued to pursue and comprehend the historical trajectories that have an inextricable connection between politics and other areas of human culture. They believed that undevelopment of political ideas result from economic underdevelopment under capitalism. From this background trajectory interplay was build up in Latin America. Catching up with the views of Marx, the political community was redefined, a redefinition that was to enable the people of each Latin American nation to govern themselves. To achieve this there was an attempt to look outside, to Europe and Africa and Asia. It is at this juncture that Asian theories became an example for the Latin American people. The proponents of Marxism borrowed Asian Marxist theories to supplement their efforts in Latin America.8 The reason for doing so by the socialist Marxist was because, they felt that Karl Marx did not think in terms of dogmas but rather had devised a set of principles reflecting the nature and development of society. So the endeavour now was for them to use these principles to examine the changing reality in order to discover the sources of change and to help society meet its requirements.9 From this background most Latin American socialist thinkers like Sergio Mendez said that only socialism can give Latin America the authentic development it needs. And they firmly held very strongly that the socialist system was in conformity with Christian principles of brotherhood, justice and peace. Sergio made it very clear that socialism was the way forward in Latin America, though he did not know what form it should take, but it remains a general line that should be followed; and it should be a democratic form of socialism.10 1.2. MARIATEGUI AND MARXISM 7 Raymond Aron, (1965) The Impact of Marxism in the Twentieth Century in Marxism in the Modern world, Milorad Drackhovitch ed, (Stanford: Hoover Institute Press) 11. 8 Peter Worley, (2002), Marx and Marxsim, (U.S.A: Routledge) 26. 9 Charles .H. Anderson, (1962), The political Econmy of Social Class, ( New York: Delta Press), 96 10 Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, (1975) Materiales Para la Historia de America Latina, ( Mexico City : singlo) 29. 4 Mariategui established a very outward Marxism that was soaked in a kind of burgeoning Stalinists dogmatism of his time. He borrowed the Stalin method and applied it to the Peruvian reality. He is said to be the first Marxist to who was so caught up with the indigenous question in Latin America. He views Marxism as a way geared towards building up a working class worldview. “He posited that revolutionists must relegate conservatives’ ideals to the background. For him Marxists are not mediocrity nor do they accept injustice. They are pessimists”11. For conservatism to be stamped out, it must not only be from the institutional level, but from the level of the spirit of humanity. As a great Marxist follower and a socialist, Mariategui borrowing form Karl Marx sees a revolution as the only way forward to solve the mess in his country Peru. Such a revolution has double edge sword, where in the revolution undertakes the conquest of thought and the conquest of power at the same time. He conceived Marxism as that which is grounded on concrete reality.12 It is not a stream of rigid or static principles. To further blend his Marxist views, Jose Carlos rejected the outline of positivism and scientism and argued that Marx’s theory and politics was stamped on science not scientism13 Moreover, Marxism for him was not a set of doctrines with some passive and rigid determinism. Karl Marx only propounded or proposed realistic politics and enacted how a new order which is socialism emerged from the present capitalism of his time. (In Marxist historical process, capitalism comes in the present phase of history14). So following the though pattern of Karl Marx, proposed a new order which will be created by the proletariat through class struggle as a necessary condition.15 Looking at Mariategui’s conception of Marxism one can easily admit that he was recapturing a lost legacy of Marxism and implementing it in his context, Peru 1.3.MARITEGUI’S ASSESSMENT OF THE PERUVIAN REALITY USING MARX’S HISTORICAL PROCESS Mariategui, following Marxian historical categories although not in an exact manner discuss the evolution of the Peruvian economy following a historical trajectory and build up. A 11 Mariategui, (1925) Pessimism of the Reality Optimism of the Ideal, Jose Carlos Mariategui, An Anthology, 396. 12 Mariategui (1927), “Message to the Workers Congress” Jose Carlos Mariategu: An Anthology, 182. 13 Mariategui, (1925-1929) Defence of Marxism, Jose Carlos Mariategui, An Anthology, 198. 14 J.P.Bangsi, (2012) The Concept of History and Scoiety in Philosophy of Karl Marx, (Bamenda, S.T.A.M.S Bambui, Unpublished), 15. 15 Defense of Marxism, An Anthology, 198. 5 strict glance through his works one can find that there is a past history of Peru which runs from the period of the conquest of Peru by Spain up till the time of the republic. The present phase is a mixture of events not capitalism alone as Karl Marx would present his. The future phase is socialism. This future phase ties to that of Karl Marx. 1.3.1. The Past: From Colonialism up to the time of Guano and Nitrates. As a starting point, in his work, The Seven Interpretative Essays on Peruvian reality, Mariategui recaptures the state of the beautiful Inca Empire that had existed in Peru before the dawn of colonialism. It was a grouping of agriculturalist and sedimentary communities.16 This is the starting point of the past phase of the economic evolutionist history of Peru. He posits that the Inca people were industrious, disciplined, pantheistic, and simple and were living in material comfort with abundance of food.17 Their population increased and even without knowing the Malthusian theory of population, the food supply was enough for the increasing population. In their primitive society, the Inca people were able to construct roads and canals and extended their borders. They had a collective and common purpose. Jose Carlos clearly states that their efforts were fruitfully for a social purpose.18 At these great glorious times of the Inca people, come the Spanish and dislodge everything.
Recommended publications
  • Chinese Bondage in Peru
    CHINESE BONDAGE IN PERU Stewart UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA LIBRARIES COLLEGE LIBRARV DUKE UNIVERSITY PUBLICATIONS CHINESE BONDAGE IN PERU Chinese Bondage IN PERU A History of the Chinese Coolie in Peru, 1849-1874 BY WATT STEWART DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA DUKE UNIVERSITY PRESS 1951 Copyright, 195 i, by the Duke University Press PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BY THE SEEMAN PRINTERY, INC., DURHAM, N. C. ij To JORGE BASADRE Historian Scholar Friend Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from LYRASIS IVIembers and Sloan Foundation http://www.archive.org/details/chinesebondageinOOstew FOREWORD THE CENTURY just passed has witnessed a great movement of the sons of China from their huge country to other portions of the globe. Hundreds of thousands have fanned out southwestward, southward, and southeastward into various parts of the Pacific world. Many thousands have moved eastward to Hawaii and be- yond to the mainland of North and South America. Other thousands have been borne to Panama and to Cuba. The movement was in part forced, or at least semi-forced. This movement was the consequence of, and it like- wise entailed, many problems of a social and economic nature, with added political aspects and implications. It was a movement of human beings which, while it has had superficial notice in various works, has not yet been ade- quately investigated. It is important enough to merit a full historical record, particularly as we are now in an era when international understanding is of such extreme mo- ment. The peoples of the world will better understand one another if the antecedents of present conditions are thoroughly and widely known.
    [Show full text]
  • Marxist Philosophy and the Problem of Value
    Soviet Studies in Philosophy ISSN: 0038-5883 (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/mrsp19 Marxist Philosophy and the Problem of Value O. G. Drobnitskii To cite this article: O. G. Drobnitskii (1967) Marxist Philosophy and the Problem of Value, Soviet Studies in Philosophy, 5:4, 14-24 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/RSP1061-1967050414 Published online: 20 Dec 2014. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 1 View related articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=mrsp19 Download by: [North Carolina State University], [Professor Marina Bykova] Date: 09 February 2017, At: 14:43 Theory of Value Voprosy filosofii, 1966, No. 7 0, G. Drobnitskii MARXIST PHILOSOPHY AND THE PROBLEM OF -*’VXLUr;* * In recent years, the question has been posed fact that things and phenomena in the world con- of the attitude of Marxist philosophy to what is stituting man’s environment have been endowed termed the problem of value. The point is not with such characteristics as worth, good and only that bourgeois axiology, which has been de- evil, beauty and ugliness, justice and injustice. veloping for three-quarters of a century, has to Doubtless, the phenomena of social consciousness be critically analyzed. Central to the question act in some aspect as “spiritual values,” i.e., is whether a Marxist axiology is possible. In they partake of the character of valuation norms. that connection the following is instructive. Finally, all these phenomena may be combined Authors who, with envious consistency, ignore under the single common notion of value.
    [Show full text]
  • The Embattled Political Aesthetics of José Carlos Mariátegui and Amauta
    A Realist Indigenism: The Embattled Political Aesthetics of José Carlos Mariátegui and Amauta BY ERIN MARIA MADARIETA B.A., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2012 THESIS Submitted as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Art History in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Chicago, 2019 Chicago, Illinois Defense Committee: Blake Stimson, Art History, Advisor and Chair Andrew Finegold, Art History Nicholas Brown, English Margarita Saona, Hispanic and Italian Studies TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………………...1 BEYOND THE “SECTARIAN DIVIDE”: MARIÁTEGUI’S EXPANSIVE REALISM………..9 TOWARD A REALIST INDIGENISM: PARSING MARXISM, INDIGENISM, AND POPULISM………………………………………………………………………………………33 “THE PROBLEM OF RACE IN LATIN AMERICA”: MARIÁTEGUI AND INTERNATIONAL COMMUNISTS…………………………………………………………...53 “PAINTING THE PEOPLE” OR DEMYSTIFYING PERUVIAN REALITY?: AMAUTA’S VISUAL CONTENT…………………………………………………………………………….65 CONCLUSION…………………………….…………………………………………………….88 BIBLIOGRAPHY………………………………………………………………………………..92 ii SUMMARY This thesis focuses on José Carlos Mariátegui (1894-1930), a Peruvian critic and Marxist political activist who founded the Peruvian Socialist Party. Mariátegui also edited the journal Amauta, which featured literature, visual art, and theoretical and political texts from 1926 to 1930. This project aims to contribute an original understanding of the thought and editorial practice of this historically significant figure by recuperating his endorsement of realist
    [Show full text]
  • Jamaica in the Tourism Global Value Chain
    Jamaica in the Tourism Global Value Chain April 2018 Prepared by Karina Fernandez-Stark and Penny Bamber Contributing researcher: Vivian Couto, Jack Daly and Danny Hamrick Duke Global Value Chains Center, Duke University Global Value Chains Center This research was prepared by the Duke University Global Value Chains Center on behalf of the Organization of American States (OAS). This study is part of the establishment of Small Business Development Centers in the Caribbean. The report is based on both primary and secondary information sources. In addition to interviews with firms operating in the sector and supporting institutions, the report draws on secondary research and information sources. The project report is available at www.gvcc.duke.edu. Acknowledgements The Duke University Global Value Chains Center would like to thank all of the interviewees, who gave generously of their time and expertise, as well as Renee Penco of the Organization of American States (OAS) for her extensive support. The Duke University Global Value Chain Center undertakes client-sponsored research that addresses economic and social development issues for governments, foundations and international organizations. We do this principally by utilizing the global value chain (GVC) framework, created by Founding Director Gary Gereffi, and supplemented by other analytical tools. As a university- based research center, we address clients’ real-world questions with transparency and rigor. www.gvcc.duke.edu. Duke Global Value Chain Center, Duke University © April 2018
    [Show full text]
  • Correlation and Paleoenvironments Above West T9.3 Tuff, Pisco Formation, Peru Caleb Stanton
    Loma Linda University TheScholarsRepository@LLU: Digital Archive of Research, Scholarship & Creative Works Loma Linda University Electronic Theses, Dissertations & Projects 6-2014 Correlation and Paleoenvironments above West T9.3 Tuff, Pisco Formation, Peru Caleb Stanton Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarsrepository.llu.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Stanton, Caleb, "Correlation and Paleoenvironments above West T9.3 Tuff, Pisco Formation, Peru" (2014). Loma Linda University Electronic Theses, Dissertations & Projects. 219. http://scholarsrepository.llu.edu/etd/219 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by TheScholarsRepository@LLU: Digital Archive of Research, Scholarship & Creative Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loma Linda University Electronic Theses, Dissertations & Projects by an authorized administrator of TheScholarsRepository@LLU: Digital Archive of Research, Scholarship & Creative Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY School of Medicine in conjunction with the Faculty of Graduate Studies ____________________ Correlation and Paleoenvironments above West T9.3 Tuff, Pisco Formation, Peru by Caleb Stanton ____________________ A Thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Geology ____________________ June 2014 © 2014 Caleb Stanton All Rights Reserved Each person whose signature appears below certifies that this thesis in his/her opinion is adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree Master of Science. , Chairperson Kevin E. Nick, Associate Professor of Earth and Biological Sciences Ronald Nalin, Adjunct Assistant Professor of Earth and Biological Sciences Leonard R. Brand, Chair and Professor of Earth and Biological Sciences iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author is thankful to several people and institutions that collaborated for the success of this research.
    [Show full text]
  • Marxist Philosophy and Organization Studies: Marxist Contributions to the Understanding of Some Important Organizational Forms by Paul S
    1 Marxist philosophy and organization studies: Marxist contributions to the understanding of some important organizational forms by Paul S. Adler Dept. of Management and Organization Marshall School of Business University of Southern California Los Angeles 90089-0808 Draft chapter for: Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Special Volume on Philosophy and Organization Theory, 2010, Guest editors: Haridimos Tsoukas and Robert Chia Version date: Feb 2, 2010 Author bio: Paul S. Adler is currently Harold Quinton Chair in Business Policy at the Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California.. He received his PhD in economics and management at the University of Picardie, France. His research and teaching focus on organization design, with a particular focus on technical, professional, and manufacturing operations. Acknowledgments Earlier drafts benefited from research assistance from Jade Lo and from comments by Michael Burawoy, Richard Delbridge, Steve Jaros, Martin Kenney, David Levy, Richard Marens, Mark Mizruchi, Craig Prichard, Mick Rowlinson, Paul Thompson, and Matt Vidal, even if there is much with which they still disagree. 2 Marxist philosophy and organization studies: Marxist contributions to the understanding of some important organizational forms Abstract This essay aims to how Marx’s ideas and subsequent Marxist-inspired scholarship have contributed to the analysis of the various forms of work organization. It summarizes Marx’s basic philosophy, theory of history, and critique of political economy; it distinguishes more critical and more optimistic variants of Marxist theory; and it then shows how these ideas have been used in the analysis of key organizational forms, contrasting Marxist versus non-Marxist approaches and critical versus optimistic versions of Marxism.
    [Show full text]
  • MARXISM and the ENGELS PARADOX Jeff Coulter Introduction
    MARXISM AND THE ENGELS PARADOX Jeff Coulter Introduction FOR MARXIST philosophy, in so far as it still forms an independent reflection upon the concepts that inform a Marxist practice, dialectics involves the conscious interception of the object in its process of developmentY1where the object is man's production of history. The ultimate possibility of human self-liberation is grounded in the postu- late that man is a world-producing being. For Hegel, from whom Marx derived the dialectic, philosophy remained a speculative affair, a set of ideas remote from human praxis. Marx sought to actualize the philosophical interception as a practical interception, to abolish concretely the historical alienation of man from his species nature, an alienation viewed speculatively by the Helgelians. In the practical abolition of historical alienation, philosophy as the expression of abstract propositions pertaining to the human condition would also be abolished. In the formulation adduced by Friedrich Engels, however, dialectics are situated prior to the anthropological dimension. A set of static tenets drawn from Hegelian metaphysics, they are "located" in physi- cal nature. It is the purpose of this paper to investigate what Gustav Wetter has described as "the curse put upon the dialectic by its trans- ference to the realm of Nat~re."~ This problem has been discussed before by non-Marxist writers.' The main reason for the present approach is that it endeavours to assess the relationship of Marxism to science from within a Marxist perspective, and it further attempts to demonstrate some of the con- sequences for Marxist philosophy that arise out of a commitment to what I term the "Engels paradox".
    [Show full text]
  • Interlacing of Times: the 'Althusser Effect'
    Chapter 2 Interlacing of Times: the ‘Althusser Effect’, Temporality and Transition The unorthodox Marxist Ernst Bloch opined that the communists’ inability to galvanise the historically restive German peasantry issued from their unaware- ness of unfulfilled aspirations sprawled across history. The institutions of the past towered over their worldview; thus, the longing for equality and commu- nity over the land was susceptible to reactionary ends as well as progressive ones. It was not that capitalist modernisation left the peasantry behind as a historical curiosity, figuring in the political scene only as rural fodder to metro- politan reactionary politics. In Bloch’s (1977: 26) words, ‘superstructures that seemed long overturned right themselves again and stand still in today’s world as whole medieval city scenes’, signifying not only an outdated prejudice, but the chronological presence of the non-synchronous. While Marxists’ exposi- tion of the roots of social issues was unparalleled, this ‘cold stream’ of reason and disenchantment fell short of inflaming the passion and hope of the ‘warm stream’, made up of sedimented folk tales of struggles against the powerful (Bloch, 1996: 595). The discussion below builds on this notion of temporal dif- ferentiation to explain its modalities as part of a temporally stratified social formation, a task for which Althusserian and Gramscian branches of Marxist theory have been path-breaking. To illustrate Bloch’s commingling temporalities, this chapter investigates the theme of temporality, and develops Marx’s earlier discernment that non- contemporaneous elements survive in a permutation of distinct modes of pro- duction. This defies a model of neatly legislated historical epochs, and rein- forces the complexity of history as lived praxis.
    [Show full text]
  • Educational Philosophy: from Classical Marxism to Critical Pedagogy
    Marxian Perspectives on Educational Philosophy: From Classical Marxism to Critical Pedagogy By Douglas Kellner (http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/) It is surely not difficult to see that our time is a time of birth and transition to a new period. The spirit has broken with what was hitherto the world of its existence and imagination and is about to submerge all this in the past; it is at work giving itself a new form. To be sure, the spirit is never at rest but always engaged in ever progressing motion.... the spirit that educates itself matures slowly and quietly toward the new form, dissolving one particle of the edifice of its previous world after the other,.... This gradual crumbling... is interrupted by the break of day that, like lightning, all at once reveals the edifice of the new world. Hegel 1965 [1807]: 380. The theory associated with Marxism was developed in mid-19th century Europe by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Although Marx and Engels did not write widely about education, they developed theoretical perspectives on modern societies that have been used to highlight the social functions of education and their concepts and methods have served to both theorize and criticize education in the reproduction of capitalist societies, and to support projects of alternative education. In this study, I will first briefly sketch the classical perspectives of Marx and Engels, highlighting the place of education in their work. Then, I lay out the way that Marxian perspectives on education were developed in the Frankfurt School critical theory, British cultural studies, and other neo- Marxian and post-Marxian approaches grouped under the label of critical pedagogy, that emerged from the work of Paulo Freire and is now global in scope.
    [Show full text]
  • Machu Picchu Was Rediscovered by MACHU PICCHU Hiram Bingham in 1911
    Inca-6 Back Cover-Q8__- 22/9/17 10:13 AM Page 1 TRAILBLAZER Inca Trail High Inca Trail, Salkantay, Lares, Choquequirao & Ausangate Treks + Lima Lares, Choquequirao & Ausangate Treks Salkantay, High Inca Trail, THETHE 6 EDN ‘...the Trailblazer series stands head, shoulders, waist and ankles above the rest. Inca Trail They are particularly strong on mapping...’ Inca Trail THE SUNDAY TIMES CUSCOCUSCO && Lost to the jungle for centuries, the Inca city of Machu Picchu was rediscovered by MACHU PICCHU Hiram Bingham in 1911. It’s now probably MACHU PICCHU the most famous sight in South America – includesincludes and justifiably so. Perched high above the river on a knife-edge ridge, the ruins are High Inca Trail, Salkantay Trek Cusco & Machu Picchu truly spectacular. The best way to reach Lares, Choquequirao & Ausangate Treks them is on foot, following parts of the original paved Inca Trail over passes of Lima City Guide 4200m (13,500ft). © Henry Stedman ❏ Choosing and booking a trek – When Includes hiking options from ALEXANDER STEWART & to go; recommended agencies in Peru and two days to three weeks with abroad; porters, arrieros and guides 35 detailed hiking maps HENRY STEDMAN showing walking times, camp- ❏ Peru background – history, people, ing places & points of interest: food, festivals, flora & fauna ● Classic Inca Trail ● High Inca Trail ❏ – a reading of The Imperial Landscape ● Salkantay Trek Inca history in the Sacred Valley, by ● Choquequirao Trek explorer and historian, Hugh Thomson Plus – new for this edition: ❏ Lima & Cusco – hotels,
    [Show full text]
  • Peruvian History and Culture Abstract
    Please note that course deadlines and dates are subject to modification. Last updated: December 9, 2020 Peruvian History and Culture Abstract Quick Fact Sheet: Type of Program Direct Enroll Language of Instruction English Course Study/Focus Sociology, # of Credits offered 3 Anthropology, Latinx Studies, Law, Psychology, World languages, Literature and Cultures, Social Services, Business, Ethics and Society, International Studies, Political Science, History, Latin, Peace and Conflict Studies *​If you’re coming from a partner school, please contact your study abroad office before officially enrolling in any course. Program Details: This course is an innovative, online study abroad option for students that offers the opportunity to authentically explore and learn about another culture while earning university credits from the prestigious Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (PUCP) located in Lima, Peru. This course aims to present an overview of the history of Peru, from the Pre-Columbian Period to the present day. It presents a broad outline of Peru’s political and economic development, but focuses essentially on Peruvian culture, particularly in regard to its Andean heritage. Subjects covered include the environment, the various pre-Columbian cultures, political violence, gender and ethnic issues, and fantasy in Peruvian literature and cinema. When the course is over, students will have an adequate introductory grasp of Peru that will allow them to eventually pursue further studies or research that fulfil their interests. © 2020 EdOdyssey www.edodyssey.com | [email protected] | +1.857.284.1740 2 Please note that course deadlines and dates are subject to modification. Last updated: December 9, 2020 Instruction Delivery: This program centers around two equally important aspects: Academic Classes with Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (PUCP) and Cultural & Discussion Module that EdOdyssey will lead.
    [Show full text]
  • PHIL 2201 Introduction to Marxist Philosophy
    Ware (2201); 16/08/16; 1 PHIL 2201 Introduction to Marxist Philosophy Mondays & Wednesdays, 10:05 to 11:25; Fall term 2016; Southam Hall 316 Robert Ware Office: 3A56 Paterson Hall Office hours: Wednesdays, 9 to 10 am; or by appointment In this course we will engage in a philosophical study of the most important concepts and theories of Karl Marx (with attention to Frederick Engels, his co-worker). This will require special attention to Marx’s (and sometimes Engels’) texts, with investigation of some of the best philosophical analyses of his ideas. We will consider their coherence and plausibility in the 19th century and consider their applicability to the 21st century. Work will be assessed on the basis of philosophical skills with respect to Marxist ideas. Our main text is: Robert C. Tucker, ed., The Marx-Engels Reader, Second Edition (New York & London: Norton, 1978) (Available at Octopus Books, 116 Third Ave.) This is cited below as “ME Reader”. All other reading materials are available on ARES or on Reserve. Week 1 7 September Marx and Philosophy Albert Einstein, “Why Socialism” Cohen, “How to Do Political Philosophy” Rec: G. A. Cohen, “Why Not Socialism?” Week 2 12 & 14 September Manifesto(s) Marx and Engels, Communist Manifesto, ME Reader, 469-500 Rec: Engels, Socialism: Scientific and Utopian, ME Reader, 683-717 Week 3 19 & 21 September Alienation and Religion Marx, ME Reader, 53-65, 70-81, 93-105, 278-293 Rec: Musto, “Revisiting Marx’s Concept of Alienation” Week 4 26 & 28 September Ideology and Dialectical Materialism First paper (800 words) due 26 September Marx, ME Reader, 143-175, 189-200 Marx, ME Reader, 299-302 Cohen, Karl Marx’s Theory of History, Expanded Edition, xvii-xxviii Rec: Ware, Intro to Analyzing Marxism, 1-16 Lebowitz, “Is ‘Analytical Marxism’ Marxism?” in Michael Lebowitz, Following Marx Ware (2201); 16/08/16; 2 Week 5 3 & 5 October Historical Materialism Marx, Preface, ME Reader, 3-6; Engels, Letters, ME Reader, 760-768 Cohen, “Forces and Relations of Production”, 3-29 in G.
    [Show full text]