DOCSLIB.ORG

11.2 DELAMAR VALLEY 1 2 3 11.2.1 Background and Summary Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
11.2 DELAMAR VALLEY 1 2 3 11.2.1 Background and Summary Of 1 11.2 DELAMAR VALLEY 2 3 4 11.2.1 Background and Summary of Impacts 5 6 7 11.2.1.1 General Information 8 9 The proposed Delamar Valley SEZ is located in Lincoln County in southeastern Nevada 10 about 21 mi (34 km) south of the proposed Dry Lake Valley North SEZ (Figure 11.2.1.1-1). The 11 SEZ has a total area of 16,552 acres (67 km2). In 2008, the county population was 4,643, while 12 adjacent Clark County to the south had a population of 1,879,093. The largest nearby town is 13 Alamo, Nevada, about 11 mi (18 km) west in Lincoln County. The town of Panaca is located 14 about 33 mi (53 km) northeast. Las Vegas lies about 90 mi (145 km) to the south. 15 16 The nearest major road access to the SEZ is via U.S. 93, which runs north–south, 17 approximately 8 to 14 mi (13 to 23 km) to the west of the Delamar Valley SEZ and also east– 18 west, approximately 8 mi (13 km) to the north of the SEZ. State Route 317 passes from the north 19 to the south approximately 16 to 21 mi (26 to 34 km) east of the SEZ. The nearest railroad stop is 20 in Caliente, 22 mi (35 km) away, while Lincoln County Airport is located 15 mi (24 km) north of 21 Caliente in Panaca. 22 23 A 69-kV transmission line passes through the SEZ. It is assumed that this existing 24 transmission line could potentially provide access from the SEZ to the transmission grid 25 (see Section 11.2.1.1.2). 26 27 As of March 2010, there were two ROW applications for solar projects and one 28 application for a wind project that would be located within 50 mi (80 km) of the SEZ. These 29 applications are discussed in Section 11.2.22.2.1. 30 31 The proposed Delamar Valley SEZ is isolated and undeveloped. The SEZ is located 32 in Delamar Valley, a north trending closed basin within the Basin and Range physiographic 33 province immediately south of Dry Lake Valley and lying between the South Pahroc Range 34 to the west and the Delamar Mountains to the east and southeast. Land within the SEZ is 35 undeveloped scrubland characteristic of a high-elevation, semiarid basin. 36 37 The proposed Delamar Valley SEZ in Nevada and other relevant information are shown 38 in Figure 11.2.1.1-1. The criteria used to identify the proposed Delamar Valley SEZ as an 39 appropriate location for solar energy development included proximity to existing transmission or 40 designated corridors, proximity to existing roads, a slope of generally less than 2%, and an area 41 of more than 2,500 acres (10 km2). In addition, the area was identified as being relatively free of 42 other types of conflicts, such as USFWS-designated critical habitat for threatened and 43 endangered species, ACECs, SRMAs, and NLCS lands (see Section 2.2.2.2 for the complete list 44 of exclusions). Although these classes of restricted lands were excluded from the proposed SEZ, 45 other restrictions might be appropriate. The analyses in the following sections address the 46 affected environment and potential impacts associated with utility-scale solar energy Draft Solar PEIS 11.2-1 December 2010 1 2 FIGURE 11.2.1.1-1 Proposed Delamar Valley SEZ Draft Solar PEIS 11.2-2 December 2010 1 development in the proposed SEZ for important environmental, cultural, and socioeconomic 2 resources. 3 4 As initially announced in the Federal Register on June 30, 2009, the proposed Delamar 5 Valley SEZ encompassed 17,932 acres (73 km2). Subsequent to the study area scoping period, 6 the boundaries of the proposed Delamar Valley SEZ were altered somewhat to facilitate the 7 BLM’s administration of the SEZ area. The revised SEZ is approximately 1,380 acres (6 km2) 8 smaller than the original SEZ as published in June 2009. 9 10 11 11.2.1.2 Development Assumptions for the Impact Analysis 12 13 Maximum solar development of the proposed Delamar Valley SEZ is assumed to be 80% 14 of the SEZ area over a period of 20 years, a maximum of 13,242 acres (54 km2). These values 15 are shown in Table 11.2.1.2-1, along with other development assumptions. Full development 16 of the Delamar Valley SEZ would allow development of facilities with an estimated total of 17 1,471 MW of electrical power capacity if power tower, dish engine, or PV technologies were 18 used, assuming 9 acres/MW (0.04 km2/MW) of land required and an estimated 2,648 MW of 19 power if solar trough technologies were used, assuming 5 acres/MW (0.02 km2/MW) of land 20 required. 21 22 Availability of transmission from SEZs to load centers will be an important consideration 23 for future development in SEZs. The nearest existing transmission line is a 69-kV line that runs 24 through the SEZ. It is possible that this existing line could be used to provide access from the 25 SEZ to the transmission grid, but the 69-kV capacity of that line would be inadequate for 1,471 26 to 2,648 MW of new capacity (note: a 500 kV line can accommodate approximately the load of 27 one 700 MW facility). At full build-out capacity, it is clear that substantial new transmission 28 and/or upgrades of existing transmission lines would be required to bring electricity from the 29 proposed Delamar Valley SEZ to load centers; however, at this time the location and size of such 30 new transmission facilities are unknown. Generic impacts of transmission and associated 31 infrastructure construction and of line upgrades for various resources are discussed in Chapter 5. 32 Project-specific analyses would need to identify the specific impacts of new transmission 33 construction and line upgrades for any projects proposed within the SEZ. 34 35 For the purposes of analysis in the PEIS, it was assumed that an existing 69-kV 36 transmission line which intersects the SEZ could provide initial access to the transmission grid, 37 and thus no additional acreage disturbance for transmission line access was assessed. Access to 38 the existing 69-kV transmission line was assumed, without additional information on whether 39 this line would be available for connection of future solar facilities. If a connecting transmission 40 line were constructed in the future to connect facilities within the SEZ to a different, offsite, grid 41 location from the one assumed here, site developers would need to determine the impacts from 42 construction and operation of that line. In addition, developers would need to determine the 43 impacts of line upgrades if they are needed. 44 45 An additional 58 acres (0.2 km2) was assumed to be needed for new road access to 46 support solar development in the Delamar Valley SEZ, as summarized in Table 11.2.1.2-1. This Draft Solar PEIS 11.2-3 December 2010 TABLE 11.2.1.2-1 Proposed Delamar Valley SEZ—Assumed Development Acreages, Solar MW Output, Access Roads, and Transmission Line ROWs Assumed Distance Area of Total Acreage Maximum Distance to and Capacity Assumed and Assumed SEZ Output Nearest State, of Nearest Transmission Distance to Developed for Various U.S., or Existing Line and Nearest Acreage Solar Interstate Transmission Road Designated (80% of Total) Technologies Highway Line ROWs Corridore 16,552 acres and 1,471 MWb State Route 93 0 mi and 69 kV 0 acres and Adjacent 13,242 acresa and 9 mid 58 acres 2,648 MWc a To convert acres to km2, multiply by 0.004047. b Maximum power output if the SEZ were fully developed using power tower, dish engine, or PV technologies, assuming 9 acres/MW (0.04 km2/MW) of land required. c Maximum power output if the SEZ were fully developed using solar trough technologies, assuming 5 acres/MW (0.02 km2/MW) of land required. d To convert mi to km, multiply by 1.609. e BLM-designated corridors are developed for federal land use planning purposes only and are not applicable to state-owned or privately owned land. 1 2 3 estimate was based on the assumption that a new 8-mi (13-km) access road to the nearest major 4 road, U.S. 93, would support construction and operation of solar facilities. While there are 5 existing dirt/ranch roads within the SEZ, additional internal road construction may be required to 6 support solar facility construction. 7 8 9 11.2.1.3 Summary of Major Impacts and SEZ-Specific Design Features 10 11 In this section, the impacts and SEZ-specific design features assessed in Sections 11.2.2 12 through 11.2.21 for the proposed Delamar Valley SEZ are summarized in tabular form. 13 Table 11.2.1.3-1 is a comprehensive list of impacts discussed in these sections; the reader may 14 reference the applicable sections for detailed support of the impact assessment. Section 11.2.22 15 discusses potential cumulative impacts from solar energy development in the proposed SEZ. 16 17 Only those design features specific to the proposed Delamar Valley SEZ are included in 18 Sections 11.2.2 through 11.2.21 and in the summary table. The programmatic design features for 19 each resource area to be required under BLM’s Solar Energy Program are presented in 20 Appendix A, Section A.2.2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Conaway Ranch in Rainbow Canyon
    The Conaway Ranch in Rainbow Canyon Rainbow Canyon Rainbow Canyon is named for its spectacular rainbow colored rock walls. Meadow Valley Wash, a year-round spring fed stream, waters thousands of trees along its banks as it flows through the canyon. Ancient Man inhabited the canyon and artifacts recovered from caves carbon date their occupation to 5,000 years ago. In the 1860s, settlers established ranches in the canyon to supply beef, fruit and vegetables to the surrounding mining towns. The Conaway Ranch The history of the Property dates back to the 1860s when the Conaway Ranch was one of the first cattle ranches in the region. It was a favorite place of writer Zane Grey, who enjoyed staying at the ranch while he was writing about the wild west. Howard Hughes, Summa Corporation, owned the Conaway Ranch in the 1970s. He intended to develop a destination resort on the ranch. In the 1980s a developer drilled water wells, built a community sanitation system and leach field, and built a 9-hole golf course on the ranch. The golf course is grown over with natural cover, but pressure pumps and some underground infrastructure remain. A domestic well and the community leach field served several homes and golf club facilities during the years that the golf course operated, and currently serves two existing homes on the golf course. This information has been secured from sources we believe to be reliable, but we make no representations or warranties, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy of the information. Buyer must verify the information and bears all risk for any inaccuracies.
    [Show full text]
  • Kern County, California
    2503 Eastbluff Dr., Suite 206 Newport Beach, California 92660 Fax: (949) 717-0069 Matt Hagemann · Tel: (949) 887-9013 Email: [email protected] August 22, 2012 Gideon Kracov Attorney at Law 801 S. Grand Ave, llu' Fl. Los Angeles, CA 90017 Subject: Comments on the Beacon Photovoltaic Project Dear Mr. Kracov: We have reviewed the July 2012 Draft Environmental Impact Report ("DEIR"i for the Beacon Photovoltaic Project ("Project"). The Project proposes to build a 250-megawatt solar generation facility on approximately 3.6 square miles of land four miles north of California City in Kern County, California. Project components include: • A photovoltaic (PV) solar power generation facllity containing approximately 972,000 panels; • 230 ki lovolt overhead transmission line; • Operations and maintenance building, parking lot, office, and sewer system; and • Access roads (DEIR, p. 3-9). We have reviewed the DEIR for issues associated with air quality, hydrology and water quality, and ha za rds and hazardous materials. The DEIR fails to adequately disclose potentially significa nt impacts from Project constru.ction on workers and offsite r eceptors. A revised DEIR needs to be prepared to adequately disclose and analyze these impacts and provide mitigation, if necessary.· Air Quality The Project is located in t he Eastern Kern Air Pollution Cont rol District ("EKAPCD") and the M ojave Desert Air Basin ("MOAB"). Both the EKAPCD and t he M DAB are designated non-attainment for PMlO (DEIR, pp. 4.2-3, 22). Significant emlssion.s of P:MlO and its contributing sources, such as NOx, will lead 1 to a worsening of regional air quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Storage Development Plan
    Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Energy Storage Development Plan Grid Planning and Development System Studies and Research Group September 2, 2014 This space is intentionally left blank Table of Contents: Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. 1 A. Background ............................................................................................................. 1 B. Scope and Objectives .............................................................................................. 1 C. Energy Storage Targets ........................................................................................... 1 1. Overview and Policy ....................................................................................................... 3 A. Purpose .................................................................................................................... 3 B. Background ............................................................................................................. 3 C. ES Regulation, Policy, and Legislative Impacts ..................................................... 5 2. Scope & Objectives ......................................................................................................... 5 A. Energy Storage System Development Strategy ...................................................... 6 B. Energy Storage System Target Development Schedule ......................................... 6 3. Description of Existing
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources of the Mormon Mountains Wilderness Study Area, Lincoln County, Nevada
    Mineral Resources of the Mormon Mountains Wilderness Study Area, Lincoln County, Nevada U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1729-B or ^JSSr Chapter B Mineral Resources of the Mormon Mountains Wilderness Study Area, Lincoln County, Nevada By DANIEL R. SHAWE, H. RICHARD BLANK, JR., BRIAN P. WERNICKE, GARY J. AXEN, HARLAN N. BARTON, and GORDON W. DAY U.S. Geological Survey RICHARD L RAINS U.S. Bureau of Mines U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1729 MINERAL RESOURCES OF WILDERNESS STUDY AREAS- SOUTHEASTERN NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL MODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1988 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center Box 25425 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Main entry under title: Mineral resources of the Mormon Mountains Wilderness Study Area, Lincoln County, Nevada. (Mineral resources of wilderness study areas southeastern Nevada ; ch. B) (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1729-B) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.3:1729-8. 1. Mines and mineral resources Nevada Mormon Mountains Wilderness. 2. Mormon Mountains Wilderness (Nev.). I. Shawe, Daniel R., 1925- . II. Series. III. Series: U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1729-B. QE75.B9 no. 1729-B 557.3s 87-600429 [TN24.N3] [553'.09793'14] STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Bureau of Land Management Wilderness Study Areas The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Public Law 94-579, October 21, 1976) requires the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines to conduct mineral surveys on certain areas to determine the mineral values, if any, that may be present.
    [Show full text]
  • Crd Title P1.Ai
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS This chapter describes the potential environmental impacts of constructing and operating a railroad along the Caliente rail alignment or the Mina rail alignment. An impact would be any change, positive or negative, from the existing (baseline) conditions described in Chapter 3 for each environmental resource area. The No-Action Alternative represents a continuation of baseline conditions. Glossary terms are shown in bold italics. DOE/EIS-0369D 4-1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 4.1 Introduction This chapter begins with a description of impacts associated with the No-Action Alternative (Section 4.1.1). As Proposed Action: To determine a described in Section 2.3, under the No-Action Alternative, rail alignment within a rail corridor in which to construct and operate a the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE or the Department) railroad to transport spent nuclear would not select a rail alignment or build a railroad within fuel, high-level radioactive waste, the Caliente rail corridor or the Mina rail corridor and and other materials from an existing would relinquish public lands withdrawn or segregated from railroad in Nevada to a repository at surface and mineral entry. The description of impacts Yucca Mountain, Nye County, associated with the No-Action Alternative applies to both Nevada. The Proposed Action rail corridors and all rail line alternative segments and includes the construction of railroad common segments. Section 4.1.2 introduces descriptions of construction and operations support impacts associated with the Proposed Action. facilities. This Rail Alignment EIS analyzes two Sections 4.2 and 4.3 describe potential impacts associated alternatives that would implement the with construction and operation of the proposed railroad Proposed Action: the Caliente rail along the Caliente rail alignment and the Mina rail alignment alignment and the Mina rail under the Proposed Action, including a Shared-Use Option.
    [Show full text]
  • Pioche Walking and Driving Tour
    Pioche $50,000 State Parks Dougherty’s Walking and Fishing of Lincoln Fine Jewelry Driving Tour Tournament County Opens Page 4 Page 7 Page 8 Page 15 Spring, 2010 PIOCHE THEN AND NOW By Jim Kelly Lincoln County and specifically, Pioche, COURT HOUSE” opens with how and why it has the dubious honor of having one of the cost so much. The two main reasons you least known, yet costliest, monuments to could’ve read in this morning’s newspaper are greed, graft, and corruption, the Wild West has CORRUPT POLITICIANS and GREEDY ever seen. BANKS. It was originally contracted to be I’m a newcomer to the quiet little town of built at cost of $26,400. But due to design Looking down on Pioche from Treasure Hill. Pioche; I’ve only lived here permanently for changes, over runs, and many pockets being about 10 years now. I was born in Las Vegas, lined, it came to $88,000. So they decided to and my father was born in Las Vegas. My sell bonds to raise the required monies, and, as paternal grandfather emigrated from Ireland to you can imagine, very little, if any, went Las Vegas in 1910 or 1911. Shortly after his toward repaying this debt. By the time the arrival he met, courted and married Martha bonds were at three times the original value in Lynch, who was born here in Pioche, as was 1907, the cost had soared to whopping her father John H. Lynch. Martha’s grandfa- $435,000. It took another 30 years to pay off ther was born in Ely, Nevada and came to the note, with the usual interest rates of over Pioche in the 1860’s during the great silver 25%.
    [Show full text]
  • Dry Lake Valley North SEZ Analysis
    1 11.4 DRY LAKE VALLEY NORTH 2 3 4 11.4.1 Background and Summary of Impacts 5 6 7 11.4.1.1 General Information 8 9 The proposed Dry Lake Valley North SEZ is located in Lincoln County in southeastern 10 Nevada (Figure 11.4.1.1-1). The SEZ has a total area of 76,874 acres (311 km2). In 2008, the 11 county population was 4,643, while adjacent Clark County to the south had a population 12 of 1,879,093. The closest population centers to the SEZ are Pioche, located about 15 mi (24 km) 13 to the east, and Caliente, located about 15 mi (24 km) to the southeast; both communities have 14 populations of about 1,000. The smaller communities of Caselton and Prince are located about 15 13 mi (21 km) to the east of the SEZ. Las Vegas is located about 110 mi (180 km) to the south. 16 17 The nearest major road to the Dry Lake Valley North SEZ is State Route 318, which is 18 about 7 mi (11 km) to the west of the SEZ, while U.S. 93 is about 8 mi (13 km) to the south. 19 Access to the interior of the SEZ is by dirt roads. The nearest railroad access is approximately 20 25 mi (40 km) away, while nearby airports include Lincoln County Airport in Panaca and Alamo 21 Landing Field in Alamo, which are located about 13 mi (21 km) south–southeast of and 35 mi 22 (56 km) southwest of the SEZ, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy and Structure of the Seaman Range and Fox Mountain, Lincoln and Nye Counties, Nevada
    Stratigraphy and Structure of the Seaman Range and Fox Mountain, Lincoln and Nye Counties, Nevada U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1988-B I 1 r^Hr-~"r-^S »:-«>'°-;>-.'; '£ '. -"* °-"^^io-'oO;ol!i-..e>L ^? :^~ty-":- o\: s--b>^.'d- .? " ? o..bTvo-r» ?:.-!:.»:-. "o'.-o'-o .- *^-o?.°:.--o : : ° o£\*>: ^-°:* '.« - "o-o- .-o - ^-.o.*'. ^» ' - 1 .". '. O- ' "" "- "* -" no: ^--'*^-o.yvo:»-c)^ - *>- : p.-by :o.;--p-/.-'o."-',c>-( 0 = ?.o'VO -V "±« -* «?'.<?o-oi ^ .. «- .*».-:»: -* ^^»-^ Chapter B Stratigraphy and Structure of the Seaman Range and Fox Mountain, Lincoln and Nye Counties, Nevada By DONLON O. HURTUBISE and EDWARD A. DU BRAY A multidisciplinary approach to research studies of sedimentary rocks and their constituents and the evolution of sedimentary basins, both ancient and modern U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1988 EVOLUTION OF SEDIMENTARY BASINS EASTERN GREAT BASIN HARRY E. COOK AND CHRISTOPHER J. POTTER, Project Coordinators U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, JR., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1992 For sale by Book and Open-File Report Sales U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Box 25286 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Hurtubise, D.O. Stratigraphy and structure of the Seaman Range and Fox Mountain, Lincoln and Nye Counties, Nevada / by Donlon O. Hurtubise and Edward A. du Bray, p. cm. (Evolution of sedimentary basins Eastern Great Basin ; ch. B) (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1988-B) Includes bibliographical references.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure 3-72. Groundwater Usage in Nevada in 2000. (Source: DIRS 175964-Lopes and Evetts 2004, P
    AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT – CALIENTE RAIL ALIGNMENT Figure 3-72. Groundwater usage in Nevada in 2000. (Source: DIRS 175964-Lopes and Evetts 2004, p. 7.) There are a number of published estimates of perennial yield for many of the hydrographic areas in Nevada, and those estimates often differ by large amounts. The perennial-yield values listed in Table 3-35 predominantly come from a single source, the Nevada Division of Water Planning (DIRS 103406-Nevada Division of Water Planning 1992, for Hydrographic Regions 10, 13, and 14); therefore, the table does not show a range of values for each hydrographic area. In the Yucca Mountain area, the Nevada Division of Water Planning identifies a combined perennial yield for hydrographic areas 225 through 230. DOE obtained perennial yields from Data Assessment & Water Rights/Resource Analysis of: Hydrographic Region #14 Death Valley Basin (DIRS 147766-Thiel 1999, pp. 6 to 12) to provide estimates for hydrographic areas the Caliente rail alignment would cross: 227A, 228, and 229. That 1999 document presents perennial-yield estimates from several sources. Table 3-35 lists the lowest (that is, the most conservative) values cited in that document, which is consistent with the approach DOE used in the Yucca Mountain FEIS (DIRS 155970-DOE 2002, p. 3-136). DOE/EIS-0369 3-173 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT – CALIENTE RAIL ALIGNMENT Table 3-35 also summarizes existing annual committed groundwater resources for each hydrographic area along the Caliente rail alignment. However, all committed groundwater resources within a hydrographic area might not be in use at the same time. Table 3-35 also includes information on pending annual duties within each of these hydrographic areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure and Devonian Stratigraphy of the Timpahute Range, Nevada
    STRUCTURE AND DEVONIAN STRATIGRAPHY OF THE TIMPAHUTE RANGE, NEVADA Volume I by Alan K. Chamberlain © Copyright, 1999 A thesis submitted to the Faculty and Board of Trustees of the Colorado School of Mines in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Geology). Golden, Colorado Date____________ Signed:__________________________ Alan K. Chamberlain Approved:__________________________ Dr. John E. Warme Professor and Thesis Advisor Golden, Colorado Date____________ ____________________________________ Dr. Roger Slatt, Professor and Head, Department of Geology and Geological Engineering ii ABSTRACT Sequences of Devonian rocks are advantageously exposed along a unique 40- mile-long east-west traverse in the greater Timpahute Range, southeastern Nevada. Study of these rocks casts light upon Devonian paleogeography, the Devonian Antler orogeny, an Upper Devonian cosmolite impact basin, this part of the Cretaceous Sevier fold-and- thrust belt, and the effects of Cenozoic extension. The greater Timpahute Range lies within the Timpahute Range 30' X 60' quadrangle and includes the region from Tempiute Mountain on the west to the Pahroc Range on the east. Concealed major north-south trending normal faults caused by Cenozoic extension have been proposed to disrupt the Paleozoic rocks of the region. However, a structural interpretation using a new geologic map of the quadrangle requires no major north-south striking normal faults. Furthermore, the greater Timpahute Range is interpreted as a salient of stacked thrust sheets within the Sevier fold-and-thrust belt. The range is bounded on the north and south by thrust tear faults that may be related to basement fractures caused by the cosmolite impact. Evidence for the Late Devonian cosmolite impact includes shocked quartz, iridium anomalies, ejecta spherules, and disturbed shallowing-upward sequences exhibiting intrasequence folding, brecciation, carbonate liquefaction, and graded bedding.
    [Show full text]
  • De Tilla Gulch SEZ Analysis
    1 10.2 DE TILLA GULCH 2 3 4 10.2.1 Background and Summary of Impacts 5 6 7 10.2.1.1 General Information 8 9 The proposed De Tilla Gulch SEZ has a total area of 1,522 acres (6.2 km2) and is 10 located in Saguache County in south-central Colorado (Figure 10.2.1.1-1). In 2008, the county 11 population was 6,903, while the four-county region surrounding the SEZ—Alamosa, Chafee, 12 Saguache, and Rio Grande Counties—had a total population of 51,974. The largest nearby town, 13 which is located about 50 mi (80 km) to the south, is Alamosa with a 2008 population of 8,745. 14 The village of Saguache is located about 8 mi (12 km) west of the SEZ on U.S. 285, which runs 15 along the northwest side of the SEZ. The SLRG Railroad serves the area. The nearest public 16 airport is the Saguache Municipal Airport near the town of Saguache. Santa Fe, New Mexico, 17 lies about 160 mi (257 km) to the south, and Denver, Colorado, is located about 130 mi (209 km) 18 to the northeast. 19 20 An existing 115-kV transmission line is accessible to the SEZ. It is assumed that an 21 existing transmission line could potentially provide access from the SEZ to the transmission grid 22 (see Section 10.2.1.2). There were no pending solar project applications within the SEZ as of 23 February 2010. 24 25 The proposed De Tilla Gulch SEZ lies in the northwestern portion of the San Luis Valley, 26 part of the San Luis Basin, a large, high-elevation, basin within the Rocky Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Photovoltaic Manufacturing: Industry Trends, Global Competition, Federal Support
    U.S. Solar Photovoltaic Manufacturing: Industry Trends, Global Competition, Federal Support Michaela D. Platzer Specialist in Industrial Organization and Business January 27, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R42509 U.S. Solar PV Manufacturing: Industry Trends, Global Competition, Federal Support Summary Every President since Richard Nixon has sought to increase U.S. energy supply diversity. Job creation and the development of a domestic renewable energy manufacturing base have joined national security and environmental concerns as reasons for promoting the manufacturing of solar power equipment in the United States. The federal government maintains a variety of tax credits and targeted research and development programs to encourage the solar manufacturing sector, and state-level mandates that utilities obtain specified percentages of their electricity from renewable sources have bolstered demand for large solar projects. The most widely used solar technology involves photovoltaic (PV) solar modules, which draw on semiconducting materials to convert sunlight into electricity. By year-end 2013, the total number of grid-connected PV systems nationwide reached more than 445,000. Domestic demand is met both by imports and by about 75 U.S. manufacturing facilities employing upwards of 30,000 U.S. workers in 2014. Production is clustered in a few states including California, Ohio, Oregon, Texas, and Washington. Domestic PV manufacturers operate in a dynamic, volatile, and highly competitive global market now dominated by Chinese and Taiwanese companies. China alone accounted for nearly 70% of total solar module production in 2013. Some PV manufacturers have expanded their operations beyond China to places like Malaysia, the Philippines, and Mexico.
    [Show full text]