DOCSLIB.ORG

Denver, Colorado 80225 Ii

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Denver, Colorado 80225 Ii DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HOD EL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report can write to: be purchased from: Subdistrict Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports Section 521 W. Seneca Street Federal Center, Bldg. 41 Ithaca, New York 14850 Box 25425 Denver, Colorado 80225 ii DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HOD EL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report can write to: be purchased from: Subdistrict Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports Section 521 W. Seneca Street Federal Center, Bldg. 41 Ithaca, New York 14850 Box 25425 Denver, Colorado 80225 ii CONTENTS Page Abstract ............................... 1 Introduction ............................. 1 Purpose and scope ........................ 2 Description of study area .................... 2 Physiographic setting. ................... 2 Land use .......................... 4 Methods of data collection. ................... 4 Well inventory and test drilling .............. 4 Seismic surveys. ...................... 5 Streamflow-seepage measurements. .............. 5 Ground-water sampling. ................... 5 Identification and location of wells and streamflow- measurement sites ....................... 5 Acknowledgments ......................... 5 Geology of the Tug Hill aquifer. ................... 6 Stratigraphy. .......................... 6 Bedrock. .......................... 6 Lodgment till. ....................... 8 Glaciofluvial deposits ................... 8 Kames ......................... 8 Outwash ........................ 10 Glaciolacustrine deposits. ................. 12 Beaches and deltas. .................. 12 Lake-bottom sediments ................. 13 Recent deposits. ...................... 13 Alluvium. ....................... 13 Swamp deposits. .................... 13 Chronology of glaciation. .................... 14 Camden moraine complex ................... 14 Williamstown moraine .................... 14 Orwell-Bennett Bridge moraine. ............... 16 Lake Iroquois. ....................... 16 Recent deposits. ...................... 17 Hydrology of the Tug Hill aquifer. .................. 19 Recharge. ............................ 22 Infiltration of precipitation on the aquifer ........ 23 Runoff from adjacent hillsides ............... 23 Infiltration from streams. ................. 23 Ground-water movement and discharge ............... 24 Water-level fluctuations. .................... 26 Ground-water availability .................... 27 Water use. ......................... 27 Potential well yields. ................... 28 Bedrock ........................ 29 Till. ......................... 30 Alluvium. ....................... 30 Beach sand and gravel ................. 30 Sand-and-gravel-filled valley near Richland ...... 31 Kame deposits ..................... 31 Outwash ........................ 31 111 CONTENTS (continued) Page Upland sand and gravel deposits ............ 32 Buried aquifer in West Branch Fish Creek valley .... 32 Water quality of the Tug Hill aquifer. ................ 33 Chemical and physical characteristics .............. 33 pH ............................. 33 Specific conductance and dissolved solids. ......... 33 Hardness .......................... 33 Alkalinity ......................... 35 Nitrate. .......................... 35 Chloride and sodium. .................... 35 Trace elements ....................... 36 Environmental influences. .................... 36 Temporal changes. ........................ 37 Comparison with water quality in other upstate aquifers ..... 37 Summary and conclusions. ....................... 41 References cited ........................... 43 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1. Map showing location and major geographic features of the Tug Hill area. ...................... 3 2. Map showing bedrock geology and glacial lobes and sub- lobes of the Wisconsin ice sheet that covered the Tug Hill area. ........................ 7 3. Idealized diagrams showing origin of typical glacial features in the West Branch Fish Creek valley. ....... 9 4. Map showing surficial geology of Tug Hill aquifer. .... 11 5. Schematic diagram showing typical glaciolacustrine deposits in northern and central parts of the aquifer. 12 6. Map showing ice-margin positions of the Tug Hill aquifer area ........................... 15 7. Map showing extent of glacial Lake Iroquois. ....... 17 8. Map showing location of profiles and diagram showing profiles of Lake Iroquois beach deposits ......... 18 9. Diagram showing the hydrologic cycle in the Tug Hill area. 19 10. Graphs showing ronthly precipitation at three stations in the study area (January 1983 through September 1986). 20 1L. Map showing the distribution of precipitation in New York ........................... 21 i v CONTENTS (continued) Page Figure 12. Diagram of water table in unconfined aquifer and potentioinetric surface in a confined aquifer ....... 21 13. Hydrographs showing annual precipitation and fluctuation of ground-water levels in the Tug Hill aquifer ...... 22 14. Diagram showing relation between topography and direction of ground-water movement ................. 25 15. Sketch showing generalized directions of ground-water movement in the West Branch Fish Creek valley during nonpumping and pumping conditions. ............ 26 16. Diagram showing ranges of hydraulic conductivity for selected types of unconsolidated and consolidated deposits ......................... 29 17. Map showing locations of seven glacial-drift aquifers used in water-quality comparison ............. 38 TABLES Table 1. Summary of average annual recharge to the northern, central, and southern part of the Tug Hill aquifer .... 24 2. Population served and ground-water pump age from the Tug Hill aquifer ..................... 27 3. Representative porosity, specific yield, and specific- retention values for different aquifer materials ..... 28 4. Minimum, maximum, mean, and median concentration or value and standard deviation for selected constituents and properties of ground water from the Tug Hill aquifer ... 34 5. Chemical analyses of water from public water supplies. 39 6. Statistical comparison of constituent concentrations in the Tug Hill aquifer with those in other upstate aquifers. 40 7. Records of wells in the study area ............ 46 8. Streamflow gains and losses in streams crossing the Tug Hill aquifer ....................... 57 9. Chemical analyses of water from selected wells in the Tug Hill aquifer ..................... 59 PLATES (in jacket) Plate 1. Camden West and Camden East quadrangles: A. Location of wells, streamflow-measurement sites, and seismic survey sites B. Surficial geology C. Bedrock-surface altitude D. Potentiometri c surface of unconf ined aquifer and hydro- graphs of selected wells E. Potential well yields F. Land use 2. Williamstown and Westdale quadrangles: A. Location of wells, streamf1ow-measurement sites, and seismic survey sites B. Surficial geology C. Bedrock-surface altitude D. Potentiomet ric surface of unconf ined aquifer and hydro- graphs of selected wells E. Potential well yields F. La nd use 3. Richland and Orwell quadrangles: A. Location of wells, streamflow-measurement sites, and seismic survey sites B. Surficial geology C. Bedrock-surf ace altitude D. Potentiometrie surface of unconfined aquifer and hydro- graphs of selected wells E. Potential well yields F. Land use 4. Sandy Creek, Adams, and Rodman quadrangles: A. Location of wells, streamflow-measurement sites, and seismic survey sites B. Surficial geology C. Bedrock-surface altitude D. Potentiometric surface of unconfined aquifer and hydro- graphs of selected wells E. Potential well yields F. Land use vi CONVERSION FACTORS AND ABBREVIATIONS The following factors may be used to convert the inch-pound units used in this report to metric (International System) units: Multiply inch-pound unit By_ To obtain metric units inch (in) 2.54 centimeter (cm) foot (ft) 0.3048 meter (m) mile (mi) 1.609 kilometer (km) square mi le (mi 2 ) 2.590 square kilometer (km 2) gallon per minute (gal/tnin) 0.06309 liter per second (L/s) million gallons per day (Mgal/d) 0.003786 cubic meter per day (m^/d) million gallons per day per 1,461.4 cubic meter per day per square mile [ (Mgal/d ) /mi 2 ] square kilometer [(m^/d/)km 2 ] feet per mile (ft/mi) 0.1894 meter per kilometer (m/km) gallons per day (gal/d) 3.785 liter per day (L/d) feet per day (ft/d) 0.3048 meter per day (m/d) feet squared per day (ft 2/d) 0.0929 meter squared per day (m 2/d) Chemical concentrations and water temperature are given in metric units. Chemical concentration is given in milligrams per liter (mg/L) or micrograms per liter (ug/L). Milligrams per liter is a unit expressing the concentration of chemical constituents in solution as weight of solute per unit volume of water, and 1,000 mi crograms per liter is equivalent to 1 milligram per liter. For concentrations less than 7,000 mg/L, the numerical value is the same as for concentrations in parts per million. Sea level: In this report "sea level" refers to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD of 1929) a geodetic datum derived from a general adjustment of the first-order level nets of both the United States and Canada, formerly called "Sea Level Datum of 1929.") vii HYDROGEOLOGY AND WATER QUALITY OF THE TUG HILL GLACIAL AQUIFER IN NORTHERN NEW YORK By Todd S. Miller, Donald A. Sherwood, and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lake Ontario Maps, Facts and Figures
    Lake Ontario maps, facts and figures A project by the FINGER LAKES-LAKE ONTARIO WATERSHED PROTECTION ALLIANCE and NEW YORK SEA GRANT 1. Origins of Lake Ontario Direct Drainage Basin 2. Population by Census Block Groups 3. Detailed Surface Water New York’s Lake Ontario . shown in maps, facts & figures Lake Ontario, the 14th largest lake in the world, is the smallest of the Great 4. Topography Lakes. Bordered to the north by Ontario, Canada, and to the south by New York State, it is the smallest in surface area, fourth among the Great Lakes in maximum depth, but second only to Lake Superior in average depth. The basin land area is largely rural with a significant forested and Lake Ontario at a glance 5. Land Use Types agricultural portion. The Lake is nestled between the mighty Niagara River Lake Ontario is the 14th largest lake in the world. to the west...and the picturesque St. Lawrence River Valley to its east. Length: 193 mi / 311 km Width: 53 mi / 85 km Almost one-third of the land area of New York State drains Published by Finger Lakes-Lake Ontario Watershed Protection Alliance (FLLOWPA) Average depth: 283 ft / 86 m 6. Wastewater Treatment Plants and New York Sea Grant. into Lake Ontario, making the wise use and management of Maximum depth: 802 ft / 244 m All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval natural resources vital to the long-term sustainability of the system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, 3 3 photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Sandy Creek Comprehensive Plan - September 2013 1 2 Town of Sandy Creek Comprehensive Plan - September 2013 Table of Contents
    Town of Sandy Creek Comprehensive Plan - September 2013 1 2 Town of Sandy Creek Comprehensive Plan - September 2013 Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction....................................................................7 Federal and State Land Use Policy............................................................9 Comprehensive Planning and Legislative Authority.............................11 Comprehensive Plan for the Town of Sandy Creek ..............................12 Chapter 2: Goals and Recommendations......................................15 Summary Analysis...............................................................................16 Community Vision Statement...........................................................18 Issues of Community Signifi cance.......................................................18 Strengths and Challenges..................................................................19 Community Goals and Recommended Actions.....................................29 Goal 1: Promote Good Governance.................................................30 Goal 2: Economic Development......................................................34 Goal 3: Environment and Natural Resources Protection.................36 Goal 4: Housing and Community Services ...................................39 Goal 5: Recreation and Cultural Development..............................41 Strategic Plan and Catalytic Projects................................................44 Plan Implementation..........................................................................44
    [Show full text]
  • Soils in Tug Hill, NY
    Acknowledgements The Cornell Team would like to thank the following individu- als, agencies, and organizations for their advice, assistance, and expertise: Linda Garrett, Tug Hill Tomorrow Land Trust; Bob Quinn, SUNY Environmental School of Foresty; John Bartow, Tug Hill Commission; Katie Malinowski, Tug Hill Commission; Phil Street, Tug Hill Commission; Michelle Peach, The Nature Conservancy; Jonathan Sinker; Dr. Charles Smith, Depart- ment of Natural Resources, Cornell University; Steve Smith, IRIS, Cornell University; David Gross, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University; George Franz and Dr. Richard Booth, Department of City and Regional Planning, Cornell University; Jeff Milder, PhD Candidate, Department of Natu- ral Resources, Cornell University; Dr. Kent Messer, Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University; Melissa Reichert and Michael Liu, Green Mountain & Finger Lakes Pictured, L-R: Sophie Mintier, Josh Lathan, James Cornwell, Chelsey National Forests; Michael Bourcy, Jefferson County Planning Norton, Ole Amundsen III, Aaron Beaudette, Julia Svard, Heather Mar- Department; Ramona Salmon, Lewis County Real Property ciniec, Evan Duvall, Ann Dillemuth, Conor Semler, Jetal Bhakta, Aatisha Services; Guy Sassaman, Oneida County Finance Depar- Singh, Himalay Verma, Camille Barchers, Jessica Daniels. ment; Charlotte Beagle; Jordan Suter, Applied Economics and Management Department, Cornell University; Patricia Box, Town of Lee Assessors Office; Mark Twentyman, New York State Office of Real Property Services; Nicholas Conrad, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation; William Johnson, New York State Office of Cyber Security and Critical Infrastructure Coordination; Christina Croll, New York State Office of Parks, Recreation, and Historic Preserva- tion. Foreword December 2006 Dear Friends: The City and Regional Planning Department at Cornell University has helped nonprofit organizations overcome planning challenges with technical assistance provided in client-based workshops.
    [Show full text]
  • Survival and Growth Responses of Juvenile Salmonines Stocked in Eastern Lake Ontario Tributaries
    Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 136:56–71, 2007 [Article] Ó Copyright by the American Fisheries Society 2007 DOI: 10.1577/T06-127.1 Survival and Growth Responses of Juvenile Salmonines Stocked in Eastern Lake Ontario Tributaries 1 2 STEPHEN M. COGHLAN JR.,* MICHAEL J. CONNERTON, NEIL H. RINGLER,DONALD J. STEWART, 3 AND JERRY V. MEAD Faculty of Environmental and Forest Biology, State University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, 1 Forestry Drive, Syracuse, New York 13210, USA Abstract.—To evaluate the species-specific and stream-specific suitability of juvenile salmonine habitat in the southern Lake Ontario watershed, we studied the effects of multiple environmental gradients on the first- summer apparent survival and growth of various combinations of Atlantic salmon Salmo salar, rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss, and coho salmon O. kisutch stocked in tributaries. Costocking of either Oncorhynchus species had no detectable effect on the apparent survival or change in cohort biomass of Atlantic salmon, but their growth rates were reduced slightly when they were stocked with rainbow trout. Generally, Atlantic salmon outperformed their putative competitors. Summer temperatures were near the physiological optimum for Atlantic salmon but may have limited the success of rainbow trout and especially coho salmon. Total salmonine biomass was maximized at sites in which only Atlantic salmon were planted. Apparent survival and biomass elaboration of Atlantic salmon varied inversely with stream size, temperature, and the abundance of wild salmonines and piscivores, whereas growth rate responded positively to moderate increases in summer temperature, agricultural development, and nutrient enrichment. These regional and species-specific differences in stocked salmonine success may, in part, be explained by variations in temperature, geomorphology, and anthropogenic influences.
    [Show full text]
  • This Page Intentionally Left Blank. Reserve for Map 6
    This page intentionally left blank. Reserve for Map 6. This page intentionally left blank. Reserve for Map 7. Lewis County COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN NEW YORK October 6, 2009 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions Existing 2: Chapter ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES major rivers and creeks present within the county, with others including: Figure 15: Tug Hill Plateau Cross Section Moose River, Independence River, Beaver River, Deer River, and Fish Topography (see Maps 6 and 7) Creek. For a more informative understanding of where rivers, streams and creeks drain and flow, see Map 9. Lewis County’s settlement pattern, economy and social structure are largely defined by its topography. The county is composed of three Lakes & Ponds primary regions: the Tug Hill Plateau (421 square miles), the Black River The North Country region within New York State is well known for its Valley (308 square miles), and the Adirondack Foothills (561 square thousands of lakes and ponds that occupy the low, flat spaces amongst miles). These three regions offer drastically different topographies that the many hills and mountains. Lewis County has many lakes and ponds have shaped how the land has been utilized since the first settlers arrived located primarily in the Adirondack Foothill and Tug Hill Plateau regions. at the end of the 18th century (see Figure 3 on page 11). Map 6 shows River, and 800 feet above the Adirondack Foothills. Overall, the Tug Hill The largest of these include: Brantingham Lake, Copper Lake, Chase the contiguous topography of the county, while Map 7 depicts elevation region within Lewis County ranges from approximately 1,200 to 2,100 Lake, Beaver Lake, Soft Maple Reservoir/Effley Falls Pond, Long Pond, contours and highlights the location of steep slopes.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the New York Lake Ontario Basin Project
    The State of the New York Lake Ontario Basin: AA ReportReport onon WaterWater ResourcesResources andand LocalLocal WatershedWatershed ManagementManagement ProgramsPrograms Finger Lakes-Lake Ontario Watershed Protection Alliance 309 Lake Street, Penn Yan, New York 315-536-7488 ©2000 Correspondence on this report may be forwarded to: Water Resources Board 309 Lake Street Penn Yan, New York 14527 315-536-7488 e-mail: [email protected] — ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS — Funding for this project was provided by New York State through an appropriation in the Environmental Protection Fund for the Finger Lakes – Lake Ontario Watershed Protection Alliance (FL-LOWPA). The 25 counties of FL-LOWPA express their gratitude to Governor George Pataki and the New York State Legislature for support of the FL-LOWPA program. The principal investigators for this project were Elizabeth Moran, Ph.D. and John Roebig, Ph.D. of EcoLogic, LLC in Cazenovia, New York. Several individuals affiliat- ed with FL-LOWPA contributed substantially to the project, including county rep- resentatives Jim Balyszak (Yates County), Warren Hart (Ontario County), Charlie Knauf (Monroe County), Russ Nemecek (Onondaga County), Karen Noyes (Oswego County) and staff members Betsy Landre and Marion Balyszak (Water Resources Board)/. Mercury Print Productions in Rochester, New York designed the layout and printed the report. An endeavor to characterize water quality status and programming at the local level across a region as vast as the New York Lake Ontario Basin depends upon infor- mation from many sources. Dozens of water resources professionals at the federal, state, regional, county and local levels and water quality coordinating committees in the Basin provided valuable information that made this project possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Quality in the Chemung River, Eastern Lake Ontario, and Lower Hudson River Basins, New York, 2013
    Prepared in cooperation with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Groundwater Quality in the Chemung River, Eastern Lake Ontario, and Lower Hudson River Basins, New York, 2013 Open-File Report 2015–1168 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. Background photograph—Setting of a domestic well in Ulster County. Upper photograph—Setting of a production well in Putnam County. Lower photograph—Sampling at a domestic well in Rockland County. Groundwater Quality in the Chemung River, Eastern Lake Ontario, and Lower Hudson River Basins, New York, 2013 By Tia-Marie Scott, Elizabeth A. Nystrom, and James E. Reddy Prepared in cooperation with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Open-File Report 2015–1168 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2015 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov/ or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod/. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 2 State of Agriculture in Jefferson County
    Jefferson County April Parts 2 & 3 of 3 – State of Agriculture & Background 2016 Contents The State of Jefferson County’s Agricultural Economy ....................................................................... 5 Farms ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 Farm Products ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Other Farm Characteristics .................................................................................................................. 7 Jefferson County Compared to Other Leading Dairy Counties and New York State .................. 7 Agricultural Resources in Jefferson County ........................................................................................... 9 Agricultural Lands .................................................................................................................................. 9 Agricultural Districts ............................................................................................................................ 11 Parcels Receiving Agricultural Assessments .................................................................................... 14 Soils ........................................................................................................................................................ 16 Natural Characteristics ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tug Hill North Unit Management Plan
    Tug Hill North UNIT MANAGEMENT PLAN FINAL Towns of Harrisburg, Martinsburg, Montague, Pinckney, Lorraine, Rodman, Rutland and Worth Counties of Jefferson and Lewis March 2015 DIVISION OF LANDS AND FORESTS Bureau of State Land Management, Region 6 State Office Building 317 Washington Street Watertown, New York 13601-3787 www.dec.ny.gov INFORMATION ON THE UNIT STATE FOREST OVERVIEW Tug Hill North Unit Management Plan A planning unit consisting of 8 State Forests and 1 Wildlife Management Area, in Lewis and Jefferson Counties March 2015 Prepared by the Tug Hill North Unit Management Planning Team: Andrea Mercurio, Planner Fred Munk, Natural Resources Supervisor David Smith, Regional Forester Edwin Sykes, Forester Scott Glenn, Forestry Technician Jacob Buckingham, Seasonal Technician Brent Planty, Conservation Operations Supervisor I Andy MacDuff, Wildlife Biologist Russell McCullough, Fisheries Biologist Erik Latremore, Habitat Specialist Ranger Jennifer Snyder, NYS Forest Ranger Bruce Robinson, Real Property Supervisor Jerry Zaykoski, Minerals Geologist Stephen Litwiler, Public Information Officer Acknowledgments The Tug Hill North Unit Management Planning Team would like to gratefully acknowledge the efforts of all those who contributed to this plan. We particularly would like to thank the following for the information and review they provided: Tug Hill Commission, New York Audubon Society, Ruffed Grouse Society, Harrisburg Town Board, Martinsburg Town Board, Montague Town Board, Pinckney Town Board, Lorraine Town Board, Rodman Town Board, Rutland Town Board, Worth Town Board, Sno Pals Snowmobile Club, Adventure Outfitters and all the concerned public who made comments and recommendations in the plan. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Lands and Forests, Region 6 7327 State RT 812 Lowville, New York 13367 315-376-3521 http://www.dec.ny.gov/lands/74515.html 3 INFORMATION ON THE UNIT STATE FOREST OVERVIEW DEC’s Mission "The quality of our environment is fundamental to our concern for the quality of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Sandy Creeks Watershed Inventory and Landscape Analysis
    Sandy Creeks Watershed Inventory and Landscape Analysis New York Natural Heritage Program i A Partnership between The Nature Conservancy and the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation. 625 Broadway, 5th Floor Albany, NY 12233-4757 (518) 402-8935 Fax (518) 402-8925 www.nynhp.org This page intentionally left blank. New York Natural Heritage Program ii Sandy Creeks Watershed Inventory and Landscape Analysis Lauren Lyons-Swift, Jeffrey Corser, Richard Ring John Schmid, Timothy Howard, Elizabeth Spencer A report prepared by the New York Natural Heritage Program 625 Broadway, 5th Floor Albany, NY 12233-4757 For the NYS Tug Hill Commission Dulles State Office Building 317 Washington St. Watertown, NY 13601-3782 January 2011 New York Natural Heritage Program iii Report Summary The purpose of this project was to provide the NYS Tug Hill Commission and its communities with a clearer picture of the biodiversity and ecological patterns of the 284,000-acre Sandy Creeks Watershed. We wished to help identify natural areas in the watershed that are vital to protecting the landscape character and biodiversity of the region including the relative ecological quality of subwatersheds. There were four phases to this project: 1. Develop a list of rare species and natural communities known from or with the potential to be found in the Black River and Sandy Creeks watersheds and create their corresponding Element Distribution Models (EDMs); 2. Overlay the EDMs and note where multiple species overlapped, indicating a potential biodiversity “hotspot” in the Black River and Sandy Creeks Watershed; 3. Analyze the quality of the subwatersheds using a suite of GIS layers in the Sandy Creeks Watershed; and 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Sandy Creeks Watershed Biodiversity and Landscape Analysis
    Sandy Creeks Watershed Inventory and Landscape Analysis New York Natural Heritage Program i New York Natural Heritage Program A Partnership between The Nature Conservancy and the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation 625 Broadway, 5th Floor Albany, NY 12233-4757 (518) 402-8935 Fax (518) 402-8925 www.nynhp.org This page intentionally left blank. New York Natural Heritage Program ii Sandy Creeks Watershed Inventory and Landscape Analysis Lauren Lyons-Swift, Jeffrey Corser, Richard Ring John Schmid, Timothy Howard, Elizabeth Spencer A report prepared by the New York Natural Heritage Program 625 Broadway, 5th Floor Albany, NY 12233-4757 For the NYS Tug Hill Commission Dulles State Office Building 317 Washington St. Watertown, NY 13601-3782 January 2011 New York Natural Heritage Program iii Report Summary The purpose of this project was to provide the Tug Hill Commission (THC) and its communities with a clearer picture of the biodiversity and ecological patterns of the 284,000-acre Sandy Creeks Watershed. We wished to help identify natural areas in the watershed that are vital to protecting the landscape character and biodiversity of the region including the relative ecological quality of subwatersheds. There were four phases to this project: 1. develop a list of rare species and natural communities known from or with the potential to be found in the Black River and Sandy Creeks Watersheds and create their corresponding Element Distribution Models (EDMs); 2. overlay the EDMs and note where multiple species overlapped, indicating a potential biodiversity “hotspot” in the Black River and Sandy Creeks Watershed; 3. Analyze the quality of the sub-watersheds using a suite of GIS layers in the Sandy Creeks Watershed; and 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Sandy Creek Comprehensive Plan - July 2014 1 2 Town of Sandy Creek Comprehensive Plan - July 2014 Table of Contents
    Town of Sandy Creek Comprehensive Plan - July 2014 1 2 Town of Sandy Creek Comprehensive Plan - July 2014 Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction....................................................................7 Federal and State Land Use Policy............................................................9 Comprehensive Planning and Legislative Authority.............................11 Comprehensive Plan for the Town of Sandy Creek ..............................12 Chapter 2: Goals and Recommendations......................................15 Summary Analysis...............................................................................16 Community Vision Statement...........................................................18 Issues of Community Signifi cance.......................................................18 Strengths and Challenges..................................................................19 Community Goals and Recommended Actions.....................................25 Goal 1: Promote Good Governance.................................................26 Goal 2: Economic Development......................................................30 Goal 3: Environment and Natural Resources Protection.................32 Goal 4: Housing and Community Services ...................................35 Goal 5: Recreation and Cultural Development..............................37 Strategic Plan and Catalytic Projects................................................39 Plan Implementation (Short- and Long-term Focus).............................39 Chapter
    [Show full text]