2015 All-Hazards Mitigation Plan Update Kent County, Delaware

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2015 All-Hazards Mitigation Plan Update Kent County, Delaware 2015 All-Hazards Mitigation Plan Update Kent County, Delaware Prepared for: Prepared by: Kent County Department of Public Safety Vision Planning and Consulting, LLC Emergency Management Division 7572 Morris Street 911 Public Safety Boulevard Fulton, MD 20759 Dover, DE 19901 May 2015 T A B L E O F C ONTENTS 1. I NTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Background 1 1.3 Purpose 3 1.4 Scope 4 1.5 Authority 5 1.6 Organization of the Plan 5 2. P L A N N I N G P ROCESS 2.1 Plan Update Summary 6 2.2 Overview of Hazard Mitigation Planning 6 2.3 Preparing the Plan Update 6 2.4 Hazard Mitigation Steering Committee 8 2.5 Community Meetings and Workshops 9 2.6 Involving the Public 11 2.7 Involving Stakeholders 12 2.8 Multi-jurisdictional Participation 15 3. C O M M U N I T Y P ROFILE 3.1 Introduction 18 3.2 Geography and the Environment 18 3.3 Population and Demographics 19 3.4 Housing, Infrastructure and Land Use 21 3.5 Land Use Development Trends 22 3.6 Employment and Industry 23 3.7 Disaster Declarations 24 4 . 1 H AZARD IDENTIFICATION 4.1.1 Introduction 26 4.1.2 Flood 27 T A B L E O F C ONTENTS 4.1.3 Hurricanes and Coastal Storms 29 4.1.4 Severe Thunderstorms and Tornadoes 33 4.1.5 Wildfire 39 4.1.6 Drought/Extreme Heat 40 4.1.7 Hail 42 4.1.8 Winter Storms and Freezes 43 4.1.9 Erosion 43 4.1.10 Dam/Levee Failure 44 4.1.11 Earthquakes, Sinkholes and Landslides 45 4.1.12 Tsunami 51 4.1.13 Volcanoes 52 4.1.14 Terrorism 53 4.1.15 Contamination 53 4.1.16 Energy Release 54 4.1.17 Disruption of Service 54 4.1.18 Weapons of Mass Destruction 54 4.1.19 Hazardous Materials (HazMat) 55 4.1.20 Energy Pipeline Failure 55 4 . 2 H A Z A R D A NALYSIS 4.2.1 Introduction 58 4.2.2 Flood 59 4.2.3 Hurricanes and Tropical Storms 62 4.2.4 Thunderstorms 69 4.2.5 Tornadoes 77 4.2.6 Wildfire 80 4.2.7 Drought 80 4.2.8 Extreme Temperature 80 4.2.9 Hail 84 4.2.10 Winter Storms 84 4.2.11 Coastal Erosion 90 4.2.12 Dam/Levee Failure 91 4.2.13 Earthquakes 92 T A B L E O F C ONTENTS 4.2.14 Landslides and Sinkholes 94 4.2.15 Tsunami 94 4.2.16 Volcanoes 94 4.2.17 Terrorism 94 4.2.18 Hazardous Materials (HazMat) 95 4.2.19 Energy Pipeline Failure 95 4.2.20 Probability of Future Events in Kent County 95 4 . 3 V ULNERABILITY A SSESSMENT 4.3.1 Introduction 98 4.3.2 Explanation of HAZUS-MH Risk Assessment Methodology 98 4.3.3 Explanation of Regional Vulnerability Assessment Methodology 99 4.3.4 County Overview 102 4.3.5 Flood 104 4.3.6 Coastal Winds 112 4.3.7 Severe Thunderstorm/Wind 115 4.3.8 Tornado 118 4.3.9 Drought 121 4.3.10 Hail 121 4.3.11 Winter Storms 124 4.3.12 Earthquake 126 4.3.13 Dam/ Levee Failure 129 4.3.14 Weapons of Mass Destruction 131 4.3.15 Energy Pipelines 136 4.3.16 Hazardous Materials 138 4.3.17 Other Hazards 140 4.3.18 Conclusions on Hazard Risk 140 5. C A P A B I L I T Y A SSESSMENT 5.1 Plan Update Summary 143 5.2 What is a Municipal Capability Assessment? 143 5.3 Capability Assessment Update 144 T A B L E O F C ONTENTS 5.4 Capability Assessment Findings 144 5.5 Conclusions on Local Capability 160 5.6 Document Review 163 6 . 1 M I T I G A T I O N S TRATEGY 6.1.1 Plan Update Summary 171 6.1.2 Introduction 171 6.1.3 Planning Approach 171 6.1.4 Mitigation Goals 172 6.1.5 Identification and Analysis of Mitigation Measures 173 6.1.6 Mitigation Techniques in the Kent County Planning Area 175 6 . 2 L OCALLY - S P E C I F I C M I T I G A T I O N A CTIONS 6.2.1 Introduction 178 6.2.2 The Cost-Benefit Review and Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) 178 6.2.3 Mitigation Action Plan 187 6.2.4 Prioritization 240 7. P L A N M AINTENANCE P ROCEDURES 7.1 Introduction 249 7.2 Implementation 249 7.3 Evaluation and Enhancement 250 7.4 Continued Public Involvement 252 8 . A PPENDIX 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction In an effort to reduce the Nation's mounting natural disaster losses, the United States Congress passed the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000) to provide new and revitalized approaches to mitigation planning. Section 322 of DMA 2000 emphasizes the need for state and local entities to closely coordinate mitigation planning and makes the development of a hazard mitigation plan a specific eligibility requirement for any local government applying for Federal mitigation grant funds. These funds include the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) and the Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM) program, both of which are administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Communities with an adopted and Federally approved hazard mitigation plan thereby become pre-positioned and more apt to receive available mitigation funds before and after the next disaster strikes. This 2015 Plan Update is conducted in coordination with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the Delaware Emergency Management Agency (DEMA) to ensure that it meets all applicable DMA 2000 planning requirements. A Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool, included in the Plan Update, provides a summary of FEMA’s current minimum standards of acceptability and notes the location within the Plan where each planning requirement is met. This Chapter provides a general introduction to the 2015 Kent County Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update. It is comprised of the following sections: Background, Purpose, Scope, Authority, and Organization of the Plan. 1.2 Background The occurrence of natural hazards, such as floods, tornadoes and severe winter storms is inevitable, and while there is little that can be done to control their force and intensity, a lot can be done to be better prepared to face these hazards. Kent County is vulnerable to a wide range of natural hazards, including flooding, drought, tropical storms and hurricanes, and winter storms. It is also vulnerable to a variety of human-caused hazards, including chemical releases, spills or explosions associated with the fixed storage or mobile transport of hazardous materials. These hazards threaten the life and safety of county residents, and have the potential to damage or destroy both public and private property and disrupt the local economy and overall quality of life. While the threat from hazardous events can never be fully eliminated, there is much we can do to lessen their potential impact upon our community and our citizens. By minimizing the impact of hazards upon our built environment, we can prevent such events from resulting in disasters. The concept and practice of reducing risks to people and property from known hazards is generally referred to as hazard mitigation. Chapter 1: Page 1 I NTRODUCTION 2015 K ENT C OUNTY H A Z A R D M I T I G A T I O N P LAN U PDATE Hazard Mitigation is defined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as “sustained action taken to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to people and property from hazards and their effects”. The hazard mitigation planning process involves the coordination of actions taken to reduce injuries, deaths, property damage, economic losses, and degradation of natural resources caused by natural and man-made disasters. Hazard mitigation is considered one of four phases in the emergency management cycle. Others include: emergency preparedness, emergency response, and recovery. Hazard mitigation activities involve actions that reduce or eliminate the probability of an occurrence or reduce the impact of a disaster. The goal of the mitigation phase is to make communities more resistant to disasters and thereby decrease the need for a response. Mitigation occurs long before a disaster. Preparedness activities include planning and preparing for when a disaster strikes and includes response capability actions to ensure an effective and efficient use of resources and efforts to minimize damage. Preparedness occurs just before a disaster. Emergency response activities include providing emergency assistance to victims and minimizing property loss. The response phase begins during or immediately after the onset of a disaster. Recovery activities include short and long-term projects that help return individuals and communities to normalcy as soon as possible. Recovery actions involve clean-up efforts, temporary housing, and replacement of infrastructure. Recovery activities typically commence several days or weeks after a disaster and are long-term. Hazard mitigation techniques include both structural measures, such as strengthening or protecting buildings and infrastructure from the destructive forces of potential hazards, and non-structural measures, such as the adoption of sound land use policies and the creation of public awareness programs. It is widely accepted that the most effective mitigation measures are implemented at the local government level, where decisions on the regulation and control of development are ultimately made. A comprehensive mitigation approach addresses hazard vulnerabilities that exist today and in the foreseeable future.
Recommended publications
  • Aids to Navigation Tended by USLHS/USCG Tender Lilac
    Aids to Navigation Tended by USLHS/USCG Tender Lilac Note: For her entire operational career, the lighthouse/buoy tender Lilac was assigned to tend aids to navigation in the Delaware Bay and Delaware River as part of the old 4th District, and later 3rd District. Due to her navigational draft of 9.5ft., she likely tended aids that were at and below the Port of Philadelphia/Wilmington, while a smaller tender tended aids in the shallower waters upriver and along the shorelines. Lightships Overfalls Lighthouses Delaware Breakwater Delaware Breakwater West End Harbor of Refuge Harbor of Refuge North End Brandywine Shoal Fourteen-Foot Bank Miah Maull Shoal Elbow of Cross Ledge Ship John Shoal Ranges Liston Front Baker Front Reedy Island Front Cherry Island Front Marcus Hook Front Chester Front Minor Lights Reedy Island Jetty Hope Creek Jetty Old Reedy Island Fort Delaware Pea Patch Island Finns Point Jetty Block Island Broadkill Mispillion South Jetty Delaware City Aids to Navigation Tended by USLHS/USCG Tender Lilac (cont’d) Major Lighted Buoys 9x38 size lighted (acetylene gas or electric) buoys at McCrie Shoal, Hen and Chickens, Brown Shoal, and Ben Davis Point Shoal Aids to Navigation Tended by USLHS/USCG Tender Lilac (cont’d) Major Lighted Buoys 8x23 or 8x26 size lighted (acetylene gas or electric) buoys at Brandywine Lump, Joe Flogger Shoal, Hog Shoal, Liston Range Channel, Baker Range Channel, Reedy Island Range Channel, Finns Point Range Channel, New Castle Range Channel, Bulkhead Bar Range Channel, Deepwater Point Range Channel, Cherry Island Range Channel, Bellevue Range Channel, Marcus Hook Range Channel, Schooner Ledge Rock, Horseshoe Shoal, and Stony Point Aids to Navigation Tended by USLHS/USCG Tender Lilac (cont’d) Tender Lilac was based for many years at the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridge Index
    Co Br# Page Facility Carried Featured Intersedtion Co Br# Page Facility Carried Featured Intersedtion 1 001 12 2-G RISING SUN RD BRANDYWINE CREEK 1 087 9 10-C SNUFF MILL RD BURRIS RUN 1 001A 12 2-G RISING SUN RD BRANDYWINE CREEK 1 088 9 10-C SNUFF MILL RD TRIB OF RED CLAY CREEK 1 001B 12 2-F KENNETT PIKE WATERWAY & ABANDON RR 1 089 9 10-C SNUFF MILL RD. WATERWAY 1 002 9 12-G ROCKLAND RD BRANDYWINE CREEK 1 090 9 10-C SNUFF MILL RD. WATERWAY 1 003 9 11-G THOMPSON BRIDGE RD BRANDYWINE CREEK 1 091 9 10-C SNUFF MILL RD. WATERWAY 1 004P 13 3-B PEDESTRIAN NORTHEAST BLVD 1 092 9 11-E KENNET PIKE (DE 52) 1 006P 12 4-G PEDESTRIAN UNION STREET 1 093 9 10-D SNUFF MILL RD WATERWAY 1 007P 11 8-H PEDESTRIAN OGLETOWN STANTON RD 1 096 9 11-D OLD KENNETT ROAD WATERWAY 1 008 9 9-G BEAVER VALLEY RD. BEAVER VALLEY CREEK 1 097 9 11-C OLD KENNETT ROAD WATERWAY 1 009 9 9-G SMITHS BRIDGE RD BRANDYWINE CREEK 1 098 9 11-C OLD KENNETT ROAD WATERWAY 1 010P 10 12-F PEDESTRIAN I 495 NB 1 099 9 11-C OLD KENNETT RD WATERWAY 1 011N 12 1-H SR 141NB RD 232, ROCKLAND ROAD 1 100 9 10-C OLD KENNETT RD. WATERWAY 1 011S 12 1-H SR 141SB RD 232, ROCKLAND ROAD 1 105 9 12-C GRAVES MILL RD TRIB OF RED CLAY CREEK 1 012 9 10-H WOODLAWN RD.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 North Atlantic Hurricane Season Review
    2014 North Atlantic Hurricane Season Review WHITEPAPER Executive Summary The 2014 Atlantic hurricane season was a quiet season, closing with eight 2014 marks the named storms, six hurricanes, and two major hurricanes (Category 3 or longest period on stronger). record – nine Forecast groups predicted that the formation of El Niño and below consecutive years average sea surface temperatures (SSTs) in the Atlantic Main – that no major Development Region (MDR)1 through the season would inhibit hurricanes made development in 2014, leading to a below average season. While 2014 landfall over the was indeed quiet, these predictions didn’t materialize. U.S. The scientific community has attributed the low activity in 2014 to a number of oceanic and atmospheric conditions, predominantly anomalously low Atlantic mid-level moisture, anomalously high tropical Atlantic subsidence (sinking air) in the Main Development Region (MDR), and strong wind shear across the Caribbean. Tropical cyclone activity in the North Atlantic basin was also influenced by below average activity in the 2014 West African monsoon season, which suppressed the development of African easterly winds. The year 2014 marks the longest period on record – nine consecutive years since Hurricane Wilma in 2005 – that no major hurricanes made landfall over the U.S., and also the ninth consecutive year that no hurricane made landfall over the coastline of Florida. The U.S. experienced only one landfalling hurricane in 2014, Hurricane Arthur. Arthur made landfall over the Outer Banks of North Carolina as a Category 2 hurricane on July 4, causing minor damage. While Mexico and Central America were impacted by two landfalling storms and the Caribbean by three, Bermuda suffered the most substantial damage due to landfalling storms in 2014.Hurricane Fay and Major Hurricane Gonzalo made landfall on the island within a week of each other, on October 12 and October 18, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane and Tropical Storm
    State of New Jersey 2014 Hazard Mitigation Plan Section 5. Risk Assessment 5.8 Hurricane and Tropical Storm 2014 Plan Update Changes The 2014 Plan Update includes tropical storms, hurricanes and storm surge in this hazard profile. In the 2011 HMP, storm surge was included in the flood hazard. The hazard profile has been significantly enhanced to include a detailed hazard description, location, extent, previous occurrences, probability of future occurrence, severity, warning time and secondary impacts. New and updated data and figures from ONJSC are incorporated. New and updated figures from other federal and state agencies are incorporated. Potential change in climate and its impacts on the flood hazard are discussed. The vulnerability assessment now directly follows the hazard profile. An exposure analysis of the population, general building stock, State-owned and leased buildings, critical facilities and infrastructure was conducted using best available SLOSH and storm surge data. Environmental impacts is a new subsection. 5.8.1 Profile Hazard Description A tropical cyclone is a rotating, organized system of clouds and thunderstorms that originates over tropical or sub-tropical waters and has a closed low-level circulation. Tropical depressions, tropical storms, and hurricanes are all considered tropical cyclones. These storms rotate counterclockwise in the northern hemisphere around the center and are accompanied by heavy rain and strong winds (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [NOAA] 2013a). Almost all tropical storms and hurricanes in the Atlantic basin (which includes the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea) form between June 1 and November 30 (hurricane season). August and September are peak months for hurricane development.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Little Creek, Delaware Comprehensive Plan
    TownTown ofof LittleLittle Creek,Creek, DelawareDelaware ComprehensiveComprehensive PlanPlan July 2006 Prepared by The Town of Little Creek Planning Commission With assistance from the Delaware Office of State Planning Coordination Little Creek, Delaware Comprehensive Plan Adopted by the Little Creek Planning Commission In December 2005; and by the Little Creek Town Council July 2006 Prepared by: The Town of Little Creek Planning Commission With assistance from the: Delaware Office of State Planning Coordination August 28, 2006 The Honorable Harry E. Marvel, Sr. Mayor, Town of Little Creek P.O. Box 298 Little Creek, DE 19961 RE: Certification of the Town of Little Creek Comprehensive Plan Dear Mayor Marvel: I am pleased to inform the Town that as of August 7, 2006 per the recommendation of the Office of State Planning Coordination, the comprehensive plan for the Town of Little Creek is hereby certified provided no major changes are enacted. The certification signifies that the comprehensive plan is currently in compliance with State Strategies. I would like to take this opportunity to thank the Town of Little Creek for working with the State to incorporate our recommendations into the plan before adoption. My staff and I look forward to working with the Town to accomplish the goals set forth in your plan. Congratulations on your certification! Sincerely, Constance C. Holland Director Town of Little Creek Comprehensive Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS TOWN, COUNTY, AND STATE OFFICIALS....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Strike!
    Your Name(s): ____________________________ Hurricane Strike! Goto The Hurricane Strike Learning Module at http://www.meted.ucar.edu/hurrican/strike/index.htm Here’s a youtube introduction to the Hurricane Strike Environment. (5 minutes) (note: the video and this document assume that you are using the multimedia version of this activity. Some students prefer the text version. ) Science Worksheet 1 (select Sunday) Watch the Weather Channel News Flash (on the Castillos’ TV) and look in Storm Track (on the Castillos’ laptop computer) to answer questions 1–3: 1. Where was Tropical Storm Erin at 8:00 PM on Sunday, July 30th? (Fill in the blanks with latitude and longitude numbers and identify N, S, E, or W for each. If you have a tracking chart, plot the location.) Latitude: __ __ . __ N S E W Longitude: __ __ . __ N S E W 2. Which place was closest to the center of Tropical Storm Erin? (identify one) Cuba Florida Mexico The Turks & Caicos 3. Tropical Storm Erin’s winds are gusting to 60 mph. How many kilometers per hour (kph) is that, if 1 mph equals 1.61 kph? _______ kph Look in Hurricanes and tropical Cyclones to answer questions 4–11: 4. Tropical storms that begin in the Atlantic Ocean north of the equator form near the … (identify one) Tropic of Cancer Tropic of Capricorn 5. Hurricanes can’t strike places in the northern part of the U.S., like New York. (identify one) TRUE FALSE 6. If you lived in Japan, what would you call hurricanes? (Fill in the blank.) _______________________________ 7.
    [Show full text]
  • ! 1! NASA's Hurricane and Severe Storm Sentinel (HS3) Investigation
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20170005486 2019-08-31T16:22:19+00:00Z 1! NASA’s Hurricane and Severe Storm Sentinel (HS3) Investigation 2! 3! Scott A. Braun, Paul A. Newman, Gerald M. Heymsfield 4! NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland 5! 6! Submitted to Bulletin of the American Meteor. Society 7! October 14, 2015 8! 9! 10! 11! Corresponding author: Scott A. Braun, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 612, 12! Greenbelt, MD 20771 13! Email: [email protected] 14! ! 1! 15! Abstract 16! The National Aeronautics and Space Administrations’s (NASA) Hurricane and Severe Storm 17! Sentinel (HS3) investigation was a multi-year field campaign designed to improve understanding 18! of the physical processes that control hurricane formation and intensity change, specifically the 19! relative roles of environmental and inner-core processes. Funded as part of NASA’s Earth 20! Venture program, HS3 conducted five-week campaigns during the hurricane seasons of 2012-14 21! using the NASA Global Hawk aircraft, along with a second Global Hawk in 2013 and a WB-57f 22! aircraft in 2014. Flying from a base at Wallops Island, Virginia, the Global Hawk could be on 23! station over storms for up to 18 hours off the East Coast of the U.S. to about 6 hours off the 24! western coast of Africa. Over the three years, HS3 flew 21 missions over 9 named storms, along 25! with flights over two non-developing systems and several Saharan Air Layer (SAL) outbreaks. 26! This article summarizes the HS3 experiment, the missions flown, and some preliminary findings 27! related to the rapid intensification and outflow structure of Hurricane Edouard (2014) and the 28! interaction of Hurricane Nadine (2012) with the SAL.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Contexts
    3.0 CULTURAL CONTEXTS 3.0 CULTURAL CONTEXTS 3.1 PRE-COLONIAL PERIOD OVERVIEW The following brief, general discussion provides an outline of the prehistoric cultural record of the Delmarva Peninsula as it is currently understood (e.g., Custer 1984a, 1986a, 1987, 1989, 1994; Thomas et al. 1975). The prehistoric archeological record of the Delmarva Peninsula can be divided into five major periods: • the Paleoindian Period (circa 14,000 - 8,500 yrs. BP); • the Archaic Period (8,500 - 5,000 yrs. BP); • the Woodland I Period (5,000 - 1,000 yrs. BP); • the Woodland IT Period (1,000 - 350 yrs. BP; and • the Contact Period (A.D. 1650 - A.D. 1700). 3.1.1 PALEOINDlAN PERIOD Native Americans first inhabited Delaware sometime after 14,000 yrs. BP, based on dates from Paleoindian period sites in the eastern United States (Custer 1989:81-86). It is believed that small family groups of Paleoindians lived a wandering existence, hunting in the shifting woodland and grassland mosaic of the time. Game animals may have included musk ox, caribou, moose, and the extinct mastodon; however, modem game animals, such as white-tailed deer, were also present in the region (Custer 1989:95-98). Skeletal evidence of extinct megafauna (mastodon, mammoth) and large northern mammals (e.g., moose, caribou) has been recovered from the drowned continental shelves of the Middle Atlantic region (Emory 1966; Emory and Edwards 1966; Edwards and Merrill 1977). The Paleoindian stone tool kit was designed for hunting and processing animals. Wild plant foods supplemented the diet. Distinctive "fluted" points, characteristic of the early Paleoindian period, show a preference for high quality stone (Custer 1984b).
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report to the City of Milford
    MilfordSummary_cover_Layout 1 12/13/12 12:24 PM Page 1 Planning for Complete Communities in Delaware Summary Report to the City of Milford aHractive, inclusive, efficient, healthy & resilient places December 2012 written by Marcia Scott and Natasha Nau with contributions by Christopher Anderson project co-managed by Marcia Scott and Theodore Patterson Institute for Public Administration School of Public Policy & Administration College of Arts & Sciences University of Delaware www.ipa.udel.edu serving the public good, shaping tomorrow’s leaders in collaboration with the Delaware Office of State Planning Coordination and funded by the Delaware Department of Transportation Planning for Complete Communities in Delaware: Summary Report to the City of Milford December 2012 written by Marcia Scott, Associate Policy Scientist Natasha Nau, Public Administration Fellow with contributions from Christopher Anderson, Public Administration Fellow project co-managed by Marcia Scott, Associate Policy Scientist Theodore Patterson, Limited-Term Researcher published by Institute for Public Administration School of Public Policy and Administration College of Arts and Sciences University of Delaware www.ipa.udel.edu serving the public good, shaping tomorrow’s leaders in collaboration with Delaware Office of State Planning Coordination and funded by the Delaware Department of Transportation This work was sponsored and funded by the Delaware Department of Transportation (DelDOT). The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of research. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official view of DelDOT. Planning for Complete Communities in Delaware: Summary Report to the City of Milford Preface Delaware, like the rest of the nation, continues to be challenged by shifts in the housing market, changing demographics, and an uneven economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Observations and Analyses of Upper Ocean Responses to Tropical Storms and Hurricanes in the Vicinity of Bermuda W
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 113, C08009, doi:10.1029/2007JC004358, 2008 Click Here for Full Article Observations and analyses of upper ocean responses to tropical storms and hurricanes in the vicinity of Bermuda W. J. Black1 and T. D. Dickey1 Received 6 June 2007; revised 10 December 2007; accepted 11 February 2008; published 6 August 2008. [1] A circular region within a radius of 400 km of Bermuda has been struck by 188 tropical storms or hurricanes from 1851 through 2005 and by 20 since 1995. Here we describe new direct and remote sensing observations and analyses of recent events near the Bermuda Testbed Mooring including Hurricane Fabian (2003), Tropical Storm Harvey (2005) and Hurricane Nate (2005). The most impressive upper ocean response of the recent events was produced by Hurricane Fabian when SST cooling exceeded 3.5°C, vertical mixing occurred to a depth of greater than 130 m, and upper ocean currents reached 100 cm sÀ1. Fabian also triggered an ocean color event visible in SeaWiFS satellite images. Related implications include improved estimates of the roles of tropical cyclones in driving meridional overturning circulation (MOC) and testing of hypotheses concerning warming of the tropical oceans which could cause more intense tropical storms and hurricanes. Citation: Black, W. J., and T. D. Dickey (2008), Observations and analyses of upper ocean responses to tropical storms and hurricanes in the vicinity of Bermuda, J. Geophys. Res., 113, C08009, doi:10.1029/2007JC004358. 1. Introduction infer wind speed, sea surface temperature, sea surface and wave height, and ocean color is proving to be extremely [2] Recent hurricane events such as those observed dur- valuable, but there are serious limitations such as restriction ing the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season, and in particular to surface expressions, cloudiness, and measurement reso- Hurricane Katrina, have focused the attention of both the lution [e.g., Babin et al., 2004; Scharroo et al., 2005; Son et scientific community and society in general on the connec- al., 2006].
    [Show full text]
  • Wetlands of Delaware
    SE M3ER 985 U.s. - artm nt of h - n erior S ate of D lawa FiSh and Wildlife Service Department of Natural Resourc and Enviro mental Con ra I WETLANDS OF DELAWARE by Ralph W. Tiner, Jr. Regional Wetland Coordinator Habitat Resources U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 5 Newton Corner, MA 02158 SEPTEMBER 1985 Project Officer David L. Hardin Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control Wetlands Section State of Delaware 89 Kings Highway Dover, DE 19903 Cooperative Publication U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Delaware Department of Natural Region 5 Resources and Environmental Habitat Resources Control One Gateway Center Division of Environmental Control Newton Corner, MA 02158 89 Kings Highway Dover, DE 19903 This report should be cited as follows: Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory, Newton Corner, MA and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section, Dover, DE. Cooperative Publication. 77 pp. Acknowledgements Many individuals have contributed to the successful completion of the wetlands inventory in Delaware and to the preparation of this report. The Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section contributed funds for wetland mapping and database construction and printed this report. David Hardin served as project officer for this work and offered invaluable assistance throughout the project, especially in coor­ dinating technical review of the draft report and during field investigations. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Philadelphia District also provided funds for map production. William Zinni and Anthony Davis performed wetland photo interpretation and quality control of draft maps, and reviewed portions of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Lang Impoundment, 2017
    Historical Documentation and National Register of Historic Places Evaluation Lang Impoundment Dike Restoration and Rehabilitation Project Port Penn, New Castle County, Delaware prepared for Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control 152 S. State Street Dover, Delaware 19901 Prepared by Wade P. Catts, RPA Commonwealth Heritage Group, Inc. 535 N. Church Street West Chester, Pennsylvania 19380 FINAL January 2017 LANG IMPOUNDMENT HISTORICAL DOCUMENTATION AND NATIONAL REGISTER EVALUATION ABSTRACT The Lang Impoundment project area contains an earthen and stone embankment with a steel and concrete sluice. The configuration of this human-built landscape element dates to circa 1920. The impoundment area has a long history of diking and embanking. It was originally called Doctors Swamp in the late seventeenth century, and by 1787 was the common property of the Little St. Georges Marsh Company, an entity that was still extant in 1917. An earlier dike configuration, dating to at least the late 1840s, shows a different shape to the configuration present at the Lang Impoundment today, indicating that considerable rebuilding and reconfiguration have taken place over time. Later work on the dike has included new sluice wing walls and gates, the addition of gravel and soil to the embankment, and the addition of stone riprap to the exterior, riverside of the dike. While the Lang Impoundment has sufficient age and retains some of the aspects or qualities of integrity that would make it eligible for listing to the National Register of Historic Places, Commonwealth does not recommend the resource as National Register eligible. It is not an outstanding example of a dike from the early twentieth century since many of the dikes along the Delaware River were rebuilt and replaced at that time.
    [Show full text]