United States of America

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

United States of America United States of America Response to United Nations Secretary-General’s Study on Violence against Children Questionnaire to Governments Contributing agencies: Administration for Children and Families, Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services Administration, Department of Health and Human Services Substance and Mental Health Services Administration, Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services Bureau of Democracy, Rights, and Labor, Department of State Bureau of International Organization Affairs, Department of State Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Department of Justice Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, Criminal Division, Department of Justice U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security United States of America 1 Response to United Nations Secretary-General’s Study on Violence against Children Questionnaire to Governments I. LEGAL FRAMEWORK International human rights instruments 1. Describe any developments with respect to violence against children, which have resulted from your country's acceptance of international human rights instruments, including, for example, the Convention on the Rights of the Child and its optional protocols, the Palermo Protocol or regional human rights Instruments. Provide information on cases concerning violence against children in which your country's courts or tribunals have referred to international or regional human rights standards. The United States has signed but not ratified the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CROC) and the Palermo Protocol. It has, however, ratified the two optional protocols to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child concerning (1) Children in Armed Conflict and (2) the Sale of Children, Child Prostitution, and Child Pornography. Aside from the CROC, the U.S. is a State Party to other leading international instruments upholding the rights of children, including the ILO Convention No. 182 on the Worst Forms of Child Labor, the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, the 1967 Protocol to the Refugee Convention, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the Interantioanl Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination. With regard to the mention of international human rights standards in cases involving violence against children, U.S courts typically depend upon protections enshrined within the applicable domestic penal code at both the state and federal level to adjudicate cases and complaints. Legal provisions on violence against children 2. Describe how forms of violence against children are addressed in your country's constitution, legislation and subsidiary legislation, and, where appropriate, customary law. The government of the United States is a Federal system, with a central Federal government; each of the States has its own government. The U.S. Constitution and the code of U.S. laws specify which functions are the responsibility of the Federal government and which functions are retained by the individual States. The Children’s Bureau has a primary concern for assuring the safety and well-being of children within their family systems, and as such addresses the prevention of and intervention for violence against children perpetrated by parents, family members, and other caregivers; violence against children perpetrated by strangers and acquaintances is the responsibility of the Department of Justice. The primary responsibility for the delivery of protective services to children rests with the individual States. Each State has its own legal and administrative structures that address the issue of maltreatment of children. The role of the Federal government is to support State-level delivery of services through setting minimum standards for laws and programs, authorizing vehicles for funding of programs, and providing oversight and evaluation of outcomes. The government of the United States recognizes that parents have a fundamental liberty, protected by the Constitution, to raise their children as they choose. The legal framework regarding the parent-child relationship balances the rights and responsibilities among the parents, the child, and the State, as guided by Federal statutes. The basis for government's intervention in child maltreatment is grounded in the concept of parens patriae—a legal term that asserts that government has a role in protecting the interests of children and in intervening when parents fail United States of America 2 Response to United Nations Secretary-General’s Study on Violence against Children Questionnaire to Governments to provide proper care. If parents are unable or unwilling to meet their responsibility, the State has the power and authority to take action to protect the child from harm. Over the past several decades, Congress has passed significant pieces of legislation that support the States’ duty and power to act on behalf of children when parents are unable or unwilling to do so. The child welfare system of the United States not only provides protective services to children, but also endeavors to provide appropriate care and services to children whose parents are unable to maintain their children safely in their homes. The structure of laws at both the Federal and State levels address a continuum of needs, from prevention efforts, reporting of suspected abuse, investigation and assessment of family situations, through foster care placements when needed, reunification of children with their parents whenever possible, to planning for a safe, stable and permanent home for every child if the child cannot safely return home. At every junction on this continuum, the safety, permanency, and well being of the child are the paramount concerns. The Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA) is one of the key pieces of legislation that guides child protection. CAPTA, in its original inception, was signed into law in 1974. It was reauthorized in 1978, 1984, 1988, and 1996. CAPTA provides Federal funding to States in support of prevention, assessment, investigation, prosecution, and treatment activities and also provides grants to public agencies and nonprofit organizations for demonstration programs and projects. Additionally, CAPTA identifies the Federal role in supporting research, evaluation, technical assistance, and data collection activities; establishes the Office on Child Abuse and Neglect; and establishes the mandate for the National Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and Neglect Information. CAPTA also sets forth a minimum definition of child abuse and neglect. CAPTA was originally enacted in P.L. 93-247. The law was completely rewritten in the Child Abuse Prevention, Adoption and Family Services Act of 1988. It was further amended by the Child Abuse Prevention Challenge Grants Reauthorization Act of 1989 and the Drug Free School Amendments of 1989. A new title III, Certain Preventive Services Regarding Children of Homeless Families or Families at Risk of Homelessness, was added to the Child Abuse and Neglect Prevention and Treatment Act by the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act Amendments of 1990. CAPTA was amended and reauthorized by the Child Abuse, Domestic Violence, Adoption, and Family Services Act of 1992 and amended by the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act Amendments of 1992. The Act was amended by the Older American Act Technical Amendments of 1993 and the Human Services Amendments of 1994. CAPTA was further amended by the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act Amendments of 1996, which amended Title I, replaced the Title II and repealed Title III. CAPTA was most recently amended by the Keeping Children and Families Safe Act of 2003, which amended Title I and replaced Title II. Full text of CAPTA can be found at: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/laws/capta03/index.htm United States of America 3 Response to United Nations Secretary-General’s Study on Violence against Children Questionnaire to Governments The publication, “Major Federal Legislation Concerned with Child Protection, Child Welfare, and Adoption” provides an overview of much of the significant legislation that has shaped child welfare law at the Federal level. This publication was prepared by the National Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and Neglect Information, a service of the Children’s Bureau, and can be downloaded from the Internet at http://nccanch.acf.hhs.gov/pubs/otherpubs/fedlegis.pdf. 2. Provide details of any specific legislative provisions on: • Prevention of all forms of physical, sexual and mental violence, injury or abuse, neglect or negligent treatment, and sexual abuse; The Children’s Bureau (CB) is the oldest federal agency for children and is located within the United States Department of Health and Human Services' Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families. It is responsible for assisting States in the delivery of child welfare services - services designed to protect children and strengthen families. The agency provides grants to States, Tribes and communities to operate a range of child welfare services including child protective services (child abuse and neglect) family preservation and support, foster care, adoption and independent living. In addition, the agency makes major investments in staff training, technology and innovative programs. Federal legislation has been passed that requires the Children’s Bureau to address
Recommended publications
  • Channel Guide April 2020
    CHANNEL GUIDE APRIL 2020 KEY HOW TO FIND WHICH CHANNELS YOU CAN GET 1 PLAYER 5 MIXIT 1. Match your package 2. If there’s a tick in 3. If there’s a plus sign, it’s to the column your column, you available as part of a 2 MIX 6 MAXIT get that channel Personal Pick collection 3 FUN PREMIUM CHANNELS 4 FULL HOUSE + PERSONAL PICKS 1 2 3 4 5 6 101 BBC One/HD* + 110 Sky One ENTERTAINMENT + 522 Eurosport 2 HD 1 2 3 4 5 6 526 MUTV 100 Virgin Media Previews HD 527 BT Sport 1 HD 101 BBC One HD* 528 BT Sport 2 HD 102 BBC Two HD 529 BT Sport 3 HD 103 ITV/STV HD* 530 BT Sport ESPN HD 104 Channel 4 531 BT Sport Ultimate 105 Channel 5 HD 535 Sky Sports Racing 106 E4 536 Racing TV HD 107 BBC Four HD 544 LFC TV HD 108 BBC One HD/BBC Scotland HD* 546 BoxNation 109 Sky One HD 551 Premier Sports 1 HD + 110 Sky One 552 Premier Sports 2 HD 111 Sky Witness HD 553 FreeSports HD + 112 Sky Witness 554 LaLigaTV 113 ITV HD* 114 ITV +1 NEWS 115 ITV2 1 2 3 4 5 6 116 ITV2 +1 601 BBC News HD 117 ITV3 602 Sky News HD 118 ITV4 603 Sky News 119 ITVBe 605 BBC Parliament 120 ITVBe +1 607 CNN 121 Sky Comedy HD 609 Bloomberg HD + 122 Sky Comedy 613 CNBC + 123 Sky Arts 620 Euronews + 124 GOLD HD 621 NDTV 24x7 + 125 W 622 Al Jazeera English + 126 alibi 624 France 24 English HD 127 Dave 625 NHKworld HD 128 Really 129 Yesterday KIDS 130 Drama 1 2 3 4 5 6 131 Dave ja vu 701 CBBC HD + 132 Comedy Central HD 702 CBeebies HD + 133 Comedy Central +1 703 Baby TV + 134 MTV HD + + 704 Cartoon Network 135 Sky Crime HD + + 705 Cartoon Network +1 + 136 Sky Crime + + 706 Cartoonito 137 SYFY HD + + 707 Disney XD + 138 SYFY + + 712 Nickelodeon 139 E! HD + + 713 Nick +1 + 140 E! + + 714 Nick HD 141 Channel 4 HD + + 715 Nick Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • List of All Porno Film Studio in the Word
    LIST OF ALL PORNO FILM STUDIO IN THE WORD 007 Erections 18videoz.com 2chickssametime.com 40inchplus.com 1 Distribution 18virginsex.com 2girls1camera.com 40ozbounce.com 1 Pass For All Sites 18WheelerFilms.com 2hotstuds Video 40somethingmag.com 10% Productions 18yearsold.com 2M Filmes 413 Productions 10/9 Productions 1by-day.com 3-Vision 42nd Street Pete VOD 100 Percent Freaky Amateurs 1R Media 3-wayporn.com 4NK8 Studios 1000 Productions 1st Choice 30minutesoftorment.com 4Reel Productions 1000facials.com 1st Showcase Studios 310 XXX 50plusmilfs.com 100livresmouillees.com 1st Strike 360solos.com 60plusmilfs.com 11EEE Productions 21 Naturals 3D Club 666 130 C Street Corporation 21 Sextury 3d Fantasy Film 6666 Productions 18 Carat 21 Sextury Boys 3dxstar.com 69 Distretto Italia 18 Magazine 21eroticanal.21naturals.com 3MD Productions 69 Entertainment 18 Today 21footart.com 3rd Degree 6969 Entertainment 18 West Studios 21naturals.com 3rd World Kink 7Days 1800DialADick.com 21roles.com 3X Film Production 7th Street Video 18AndUpStuds.com 21sextreme.com 3X Studios 80Gays 18eighteen.com 21sextury Network 4 Play Entertainment 818 XXX 18onlygirls.com 21sextury.com 4 You Only Entertainment 8cherry8girl8 18teen 247 Video Inc 4-Play Video 8Teen Boy 8Teen Plus Aardvark Video Absolute Gonzo Acerockwood.com 8teenboy.com Aaron Enterprises Absolute Jewel Acheron Video 8thstreetlatinas.com Aaron Lawrence Entertainment Absolute Video Acid Rain 9190 Xtreme Aaron Star Absolute XXX ACJC Video 97% Amateurs AB Film Abstract Random Productions Action Management 999
    [Show full text]
  • 442 Final FOURTH COMMUNICATION from the COMMISSION TO
    COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 17.07.2000 COM(2000) 442 final FOURTH COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT on the application of Articles 4 and 5 of Directive 89/552/EEC "Television without Frontiers" for the period 1997-8 CONTENTS Introduction 3 I. Commission's opinion on the application of Articles 4 and 5 for the period 1997-1998 4 1. Application by EU Member States 4 1.1. Broadcasting of a majority proportion of European works. 4 1.2. Works by independent producers 9 2. Application by the Member States of the European Free Trade Area participating in the European Economic Area 11 II. Summary of reports from Member States 12 III. Summary of reports from the Member States of the European Free Trade Area that are part of the European Economic Area 61 IV. ANNEXES 65 Annex 1 : Document "Suggested new guidelines for monitoring application of Articles 4 and 5 of the "Television without frontiers" Directive 66 Annex 2 : List of European television channels, by country, not achieving the target for the proportion of European works and independent productions 71 Annex 3: Parameters used to calculate the weighted averages of broadcasts of European works by the channels of the European Union with a major audience. 77 2 INTRODUCTION This is the fourth Commission monitoring report on the application of Articles 4 and 5 of Directive 89/552/EEC1 as amended by Directive 97/36/EC2, for the years 1997 and 1998. It was drawn up on the basis of the reports sent in by the Member States concerning the application of Articles 4 and 5 over the reference period.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Joint Conference of the National Popular Culture and American Culture Associations
    2009 Joint Conference of the National Popular Culture and American Culture Associations April 8 – 11, 2009 New Orleans Marriott Delores F. Rauscher, Editor & PCA/ACA Conference Coordinator Michigan State University Wiley-Blackwell Editor: Elna Lim Additional information about the PCA/ACA available at www.pcaaca.org 2 Table of Contents The 2008 National Conference Popular Culture Association & American Culture Association Area Chairs ..................................5 PCA/ACA Board Members.........................................................13 Officers........................................................................................13 Executive Officers.......................................................................13 Past & Future Conferences..........................................................14 Conference Papers For Sale; Benefits Endowment.....................15 Exhibit Hours ..............................................................................15 Business & Board Meetings........................................................16 Film Screenings...........................................................................18 Tours, Get-Togethers, Receptions, & Dinners............................22 Special Sessions ..........................................................................24 SCHEDULE OVERVIEW:............................................................32 DAILY SCHEDULE: ....................................................................52 Wednesday, 12:30 P.M. – 2:00 P.M. .........................................52
    [Show full text]
  • Broadcast Bulletin Issue Number 159 07/06/10
    O fcom Broadcast Bulletin Issue number 159 7 June 2010 1 Ofcom Broadcast Bulletin, Issue 159 7 June 2010 Contents Introduction 3 Standards cases In Breach Connect the World CNN International, 6 January 2010, 21:00 4 Dubai World Cup Special Channel 4, 27 March 2010, 17:15 9 Sponsorship of The Real Sports Phone-in Real Radio Wales, 1 and 2 February 2010 11 Lord of the Ring Promotion Sky Box Office, 3 April 2010, 19:00 13 Advertisements for 4EverGlazing Buzz Asia (Greater London), 4 December 2009, 17:41 and 7 December 2009, 06:28 15 Elite Days Elite, 31 March 2010, 15:00 to 16:00 17 Reference to website address Television X (Freeview channel 93), between 10 and 15 March 2010, 03:00 to 23:00 20 Retention of recordings Rocks TV, 11 April 2010 22 Fairness & Privacy cases Not Upheld Complaint by Mr Shaun McCarthy Traffic Cops, BBC1, 12 November 2009 24 Other programmes not in breach 30 2 Ofcom Broadcast Bulletin, Issue 159 7 June 2010 Introduction The Broadcast Bulletin reports on the outcome of investigations into alleged breaches of those Ofcom codes which broadcasting licensees are required to comply. These include: a) Ofcom’s Broadcasting Code (“the Code”) which took effect on 16 December 2009 and covers all programmes broadcast on or after 16 December 2009. The Broadcasting Code can be found at http://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv/ifi/codes/bcode/. Note: Programmes broadcast prior to 16 December 2009 are covered by the 2005 Code which came into effect on 25 July 2005 (with the exception of Rule 10.17 which came into effect on 1 July 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Everyone's Watching
    British Sky Broadcasting Group plc Everyone’s watching Grant Way, Isleworth, Middlesex TW7 5QD England Telephone +44 (0)870 240 3000 Facsimile +44 (0)870 240 3060 www.sky.com Registered in England No. 2247735 A digital vision for everyone Contents Introduction 01 Introduction Remember when your television was part of the furniture? 02 Overview 06 Our achievements When it sat in the corner of your living room – and your 08 Everyone’s watching 12 Customer culture life – presenting a limited choice of programmes from a 14 Programming overview 26 Channels on digital satellite 28 At a glance broadcasting establishment that had turned complacency 30 Watching everyone 32 The challenges ahead into a fine art? “Take it or leave it,” they told the British public. When Sky offered an alternative, millions of people took it to their hearts – and left traditional broadcasters stunned. In twelve exhilarating years, we have transformed the television from an inanimate piece of furniture into an irresistibly positive force in people’s lives. We are now close to the very heart of 21st century living. Once labelled a downmarket upstart, Sky’s achievements have given it a firm footing in the broadcasting landscape. But its embrace will never stifle its pioneering spirit. Invention and creativity, entertainment and challenge remain our guiding principles. At the heart of our culture lies an uncompromising commitment to understanding what people want – then delivering it. We are passionate about the potential of digital television. After all, it is the tool we use to make every day extraordinary for every one of our customers.
    [Show full text]
  • 1073 COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Background Document
    COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels,14.8.2006 SEC(2006)1073 COMMISSIONSTAFFWORKINGDOCUMENT Backgrounddocumentstothe COMMUNICATIONFROMTHECOMMISSIONTOTHE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,THECOUNCIL,THEEUROPEANECONOMIC ANDSOCIAL COMMITTEEANDTHECOMMITTEEOFTHEREGIONS Seventhcommunicationontheapplicationof Articles4and5ofDirective89/552/EEC "Television withoutFrontiers",asamendedbyDirective97/36/EC, fortheperiod20032004 {COM(2006)459final} EN EN TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUNDDOCUMENT1–Performanceindicators.................................................... 3 BACKGROUNDDOCUMENT2–ChartsandTableson theapplicationofArticles4and5.............................................................................................. 6 BACKGROUNDDOCUMENT3–Applicationof Articles4and5ineachMemberState.. .................................................................................. 16 BACKGROUNDDOCUMENT4Summaryof thereportsfromtheMemberStates ......................................................................................... 45 BACKGROUNDDOCUMENT5Summaryofthereportsfrom theMemberStatesoftheEuropeanFreeTradeAssociationparticipating intheEuropeanEconomicArea............................................................................................. 164 BACKGROUNDDOCUMENT6 Listoftelevisionchannelsin theEuropeanUnionMemberStateswhichfailedtoachievethemajority proportionaccordingtoArticle4 ........................................................................................... 167 BACKGROUNDDOCUMENT7averagetransmissiontime* ofeuropeanworks by primary channels(“de-minimis-criterion”)
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Naughty Realism
    Naughty Realism: The Britishness of British Hardcore R18s I.Q. Hunter Hardcore pornography may be a film genre, but it is by no means an ordinary one (Williams 1991). Quite apart from its uses and affects, which are arguably at odds with those of narrative cinema, hardcore remains an outlaw genre, toxic and degrading, rigorously policed and segregated, and universally reviled. It often seems to be a genre without an audience, for people rarely admit to watching hardcore films – the standard term is ‘using’, as with drugs – and thereby admitting to masturbation, which remains, for men at least, a rare surviving sexual taboo. Nevertheless, porn does appear to be a popular genre. Trustworthy figures about sales, internet traffic and usage are hard to come by (Chalabi 2013). Most statistics relate to accessing porn on the internet, but their accuracy is controversial and they are cited to scare as much as to inform (Ministry of Truth 2013). One much cited survey from 2012 claims that a third of all internet usage is porn-related (Anthony 2012). An older survey, from 2006, put the UK as ranking sixth among nations in terms of pornography revenue ($1.97 billion), behind the table leader, China ($27.40 billion), South Korea, Japan, the US ($13.33 billion), and Australia (Ropelato 2006). US porn revenue, the survey noted, exceeded the combined revenues of ABC, CBS, and NBC. Another survey claimed that Britain was the fastest growing market for internet porn, and, in Britain, women the fastest growing demographic (Hayes 2006). Whatever the validity of these statistics, they underline that hardcore porn is an immensely successful phenomenon even as it becomes an object of increasing social and cultural unease.
    [Show full text]
  • Wednesday, April 16, 2003
    2007 Joint Conference of the National Popular Culture and American Culture Associations April 4 - 7, 2007 Boston Marriott Copley Place ii Editor: Leslie L. Fife, Oklahoma State University; PCA/ACA Conference Coordinator Blackwell Editor: Michelle Sathan Additional information about the PCA/ACA is available at http://www.h-net.org/~pcaaca Table of Contents iii TABLE OF CONTENTS PCA AREA CHAIRS FOR THE 2007 CONFERENCE................. V ACA AREA CHAIRS FOR THE 2007 CONFERENCE ............XIV PCA/ACA CONFERENCE SITES & DATES........................... XVII 2006 PCA OFFICERS .................................................................XVIII 2006 ACA OFFICERS.................................................................XVIII BUSINESS AND BOARD MEETINGS........................................XIX SPECIAL CONFERENCE SESSIONS AND EVENTS...........XXIII CONFERENCE PAPERS FOR SALE ......................................XXXI REGISTRATION & EXHIBIT INFORMATION ................... XXXI SCHEDULE OVERVIEW........................................................ XXXII SCHEDULE ......................................................................................... 1 WEDNESDAY, APRIL 4, 2007 .......................................................... 1 WEDNESDAY, APRIL 4, 12:30–2:00 P.M............................................. 1 WEDNESDAY, APRIL 4, 2:30–4:00 P.M............................................... 5 WEDNESDAY, APRIL 4, 4:30–6:00 P.M............................................. 14 WEDNESDAY, APRIL 4, 6:30–8:00 PM.............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Brussels, 03.04.1998 COM(1998) 199 Final THIRD COMMUNICATION
    COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 03.04.1998 COM(1998) 199 final THIRD COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT on the' application of Articles 4 and 5 of Directive 89/552/EEC · · "Television without Frontiers" for the period 1995-96 including an overall assessment of application over the period 1991-96 CONTENTS SUMMARY 3 INTRODUCTION 5 I-SUMMARYOFREPORTS FROMMEMBERSTATES 7 II- SUMMARY OF REPORTS FROM THE MEMBER STATES OF THE EUROPEAN FREE TRADE ASSOCIATION THAT.ARE PART OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA 45 III- COMMISSION'S OPINION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION AND GENERAL CONCLUSION OF THE PERIOD 1991-1996 48 L Commission's opinion on the Member States' reports 48 1.1. Implementation by EU Member States 48 1.2. Implementation by the Member States of the European Free Trade Area participating in the European Economic Area 55 2. Commission's opinion on the period 1991-1996 56 2.1. European works 56 2.2 Independent productions 56 2.3. Classifying the channels 57 IV -MONITORING IN THE FUTURE: THE NEW TELEVISION WITHOUT FRONTIERS DIRECTIVE 59 1. The new Television without Frontiers directive 59 2. Monitoring in the context of the changing face of the audiovisual industry in Europe 61 V - ANNEXES 64 Annex 1: "Suggested guidelines for the monitoring of the "Television without Frontiers" Directive" (in force for the period covered by this report) 65 Annex 2: Number of channels per country in Europe (1992-1996) 68 Annex 3 : List of channels not achieving the target for European works and independent productions (1995-1996) 70 SUMMARY This is the third Commission monitoring report on the application of Articles 4 and 51 of the Television without Frontiers Directive.2 It covers the 1995-96 period.
    [Show full text]
  • Ofcom Content Sanctions Committee
    Ofcom Content Sanctions Committee It is Ofcom policy to state the full language used on air by broadcasters who are the subject of a sanction adjudicated upon by the Content Sanctions Committee where it is relevant to the case. Some of the language used in this decision may therefore cause offence. Consideration of Portland Enterprises (C.I.) Limited (“the Licensee” or sanction against: “Portland”), in respect of its service Television X – The Fantasy Channel (“TVX” or “the Channel”). For: Breaches of Ofcom’s Broadcasting Code (“the Code”) in respect of: Rule 1.24: “Premium subscription services and pay per view/night services may broadcast ‘adult-sex’ material between 2200 and 0530 provided that in addition to other protections: • there is a mandatory PIN protected encryption system, or other equivalent protection, that seeks satisfactorily to restrict access solely to those authorised to view; and • there are measures in place that ensure that the subscriber is an adult”; Rule 1.25: “BBFC R18-rated films or their equivalent must not be broadcast”; Rule 2.1: “Generally accepted standards must be applied to the contents of television and radio services so as to provide adequate protection for members of the public from the inclusion in such services of harmful and/or offensive material”; and Rule 2.3: “In applying generally accepted standards broadcasters must ensure that material which may cause offence is justified by the context…Appropriate information should also be broadcast where it would assist in avoiding or minimising offence”. On: 8 June 2007. Decision: To impose a financial penalty on Portland of £25,000 (payable to HM Paymaster General).
    [Show full text]
  • “The Obscenification of Everyday Life” Representing Pornography in Anglo- American Fiction Since 1970
    “The Obscenification of Everyday Life” Representing Pornography in Anglo- American Fiction since 1970 “De Obscenificatie van het Alledaagse” Verbeeldingen van Pornografie in Brits-Amerikaanse Fictie na 1970 (met een samenvatting in het Nederlands) Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit Utrecht op gezag van de rector magnificus, prof. dr. G.J. van der Zwaan, ingevolge het besluit van het college voor promoties in het openbaar te verdedigen op woensdag 6 december 2017 des middags te 4.15 uur door Simon John Cook geboren op 8 september 1963 te Chiswick, Verenigd Koninkrijk 2 Promotor: Prof. dr. D.A. Pascoe 3 ISBN/EAN: 978-90-393-6894-7 Titel: “The Obscenification of Everyday Life” Ondertitel: Representing Pornography in Anglo-American Fiction since 1970 Auteur: Cook, S.J. Uitgever: Universiteit Utrecht Bib. Imprint : Universiteit Utrecht NUR-code: 630 NUR-omschrijving: Buitenlandse talen, letterkunde en cultuur algemeen Druk: 1 Illustraties: Ja Aantal pagina's: 192 Taal: Engels Verschijningsvorm: Boek Bindwijze: Ingenaaid Verschijningsdatum: 06-12-2017 4 Contents Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Note on Referencing ............................................................................................................................. 6 Foreword ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]