And Others Education and Major Philanthropic Foundations. a Report to the National Academy of Education
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
DOCUHERT RESUME ED 125 447 HE 008 017 AUTHOR Havighuist, Robert J.; And Others '\ TITLE Education and Major Philanthropic Foundations. A Report to the National Academy of Education. INSTITUTION National Academy of Education, Washington, D.C. SPONS AGENCY Spencer Foundation, Chicago, Ill-. PUB DATE 6 Apr 76 NOTE 251p. EDES. PRICE MF-SC.83 MC-314.05 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Comparative Analysis; *Educational Finance; Educational Objectives; Elementary Education; Expenditures; *Financial Support; *Foundation Programs; Government Role; Grants; *Higher Education; Pest Secondary Education; *Private Financial Support; Program Descriptions; Secondary Education ABSTRACT Nine foundations are the focus of this study of the educational activities of major philanthropic foundations. The foundations are: (1) Ford;(2) Grant; (3) Russell Sage;(4) Carnegie; (5) Danforth; (6) Kellogg; (7) Lilly; (8) Mott; and (9) Rockefeller. After a brief overv. w foundation activities, general themes, apprcpriaions and projec s,, and the use of dollars are discussed. Foundations are compar with goveinment supportof educational innovation and experimentation, and an evaluation of foundation performance is presented. Appendices list:(1) categories for study of foundation grants;(2) constant dollar coefficients; and(3)' the questionnaire for recipientS of foundation and goiernment grants to education. (SCE) sir . ************************1,0**4*********************************** ***--7-: * Documents acquired by ERIC include many in dal mipublishe .s * materials not available from other sources C makes every effo e * to obtain'the best copy available. le eless, items of marginal * reproducibility are often enco and this affects the 'quality * of the microfiche and hardcopy reproductions ERI,C makes available' * * via the ERIC Document Reproduction Service (EDRS). EDRS is not * * responsible for the quality of the 'original document. Reproddctione * * supplied by EDRS are the best that can be wade from the original. *' ssms**********************************************rnssssisssss*lassis , . 11 LA Major Philanthropic Foundations r-4 Education a C:1 11 A Report I to the National Acade of Education b y . bert J.'Haxighurst Professor Education and Human Development e University of Chicago Donald B. Uolsinger Assistant Professor of Education The University of Chicago . Erik S. Lunde Assistant: Professor, Department of American Thought and Language Michigan State University, U ARTMEPIT Ot FIEALTII. EDUCATION AWILLIIARE -NATIONAL INSTITUT; OF EDUCATION , MIS DOCUMENT mAS SEEN REPRO. DUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR ORGAitaiZATiCieORIOtt- TrAIG IT POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONS STATED oo-NOT NECESSARILY *ERRE SENT OfFtCsAt, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY 1976 Table of Contents PREFACE I. INTRODUCTION Brief overview of foundationactivityltthe field of education from 1900 to the present. II. ANALYSIS OF EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY'OFFOUNDATIONS' General themes of activity, related tochanging social conclitions and changing social needs. Categories of appropriations andprojects, for quantitative analysis. Use of dollars of 1967 purchasing powerto facilitate comparisons from one decade to another. SUPPORT OF EDUCATIONAL INNOVATION III. FOUNDATIONS COMPARED WITH GOVERNMENT IN AND EXPERIMENTATION -IV. EVALUATION OF FOUNDATION PERFORMANCE V. PERSPECTIVES CASE STUDIES OF THE NINE FOUNDATIONS VI. ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATIONS 0 VII. RUSSELL SAGE FOUNDATION VIII. CARNEGIE CORPORATION AND FOUNDATION IX. DANFORTH FOUNDATION X. W. K. KELLOGG FOUNDATION .* XI. FORD FOUNDATION XII. GRANT FOUNDATION, INC. XIII. LILLY ENDOWMENT, INC. 0-7-1 XIV. MD FOUNDATION APPENDICES ti P-3 PREFACE This Report is the product of collaboration of the three authorsover a period of about 21 months, froth May, 1974 to January, 1976. It started with the appointment of Donald Holsinger as an Academy Spencer Associate for the summer of 1974, to work'with the senior author on a study of educational activities of philanthropic ations. The Academy Spencer Associates PrograM provides a summer earch stipend for a younger scholar to work in close collab- oration wija member of the Academy on specific problems'in education. e plan to study the educational activities of major philanthropic founda- . ions was so broad as to make it questionable whether a summer's work by one individual could cope with it. However, the senior author had been working in t. ''this area in a casual way for some,years, and the subject itself wasso attrac- tive that it seemed worth while to make a start with whateveresources were 'available. Furthermore, several very competent younger s-were recommended for the award,,and Mr. H. Thomas JamesPresident of the Spencer Foundation, encouraged the senior authoi to apply directly to the Foundation for a second award, which was made to Erik S. Lunde. e Academy tpencer Associates program also provides the sum of $2,500 for travel and other expenses in addition to the summer research7tipend for the Associate. With these resources, the three authorked'iritensively during the sum- mer of 1974. Theyselected nine Foundations for special study, and they spent ten days_in New York City, working at the Foundation Center with its excellent Library, and interviewing officers of the five Foundations with New York headquarters, among the nine which had been chosen for special study. Visits and extensive correspondence were organized !or the other four Foundations. 4 P-/. - 2 - The end of the summer of 1974 found the authors so engrossed in the study that they decided to carry it on, in their spare time. At this point they decided to analyze the grants in'the field of education made by the several.foundations, using a set of content categories and dollars of constant purchasing power. The categories were worked out in conference, so as to get a set of descriptive categories that would facilitate comparison of foundations with eachother, and study of the program of a given fOundation as it developed through time. These categories'are,given in Appendix A. They may prove to be useful to. other researchers who wish to make a quantitative study., Dr. Holsinger took charge of the complicated task of transferring data from coding sheets to punch cards t6 the computer. Most of'th'Tables in the Report which follow Chapter I . are based on his work.' The officers of the, nine Foundations were all cooperativeandfriendlY to the project, as were the staff members of the Foundation Center in New York City. The Report consists of two Parts: the 'first being:4 general study of Foundation activity in the broad field of education; the second being a set of case studies of the nine Foundations. The case studies were written by they-- three authors as follows: Holsinged-Ford, Grater -and Russell Sage: Lunde Carnegie,.Danforth, and Kellogg; Havighurst--Lilly, Mott, andRockefeller. The chapters in the first part were put into final shape by Havighurst, with help from the two junior authors. The senior author has had an extensive experience with Foundations,'both as an officer and as a grantee. He served 4, the General Education Board (Rockefeller FOundation) from 1934 through1940 as .Assistant Director and later Director of the Program in General Education, velich supported innovation andexperimentation in the field of secondary and 5 P-5 3 Board's, program in Child andAdoles- 'college education. He also directed the Later, ill 1947 and cent Development during thelitter part of this periOd. 1948, he spent about8months in CentralEurope as arepresentative_of the out ways by which theFoundation could aid in Rockefeller Foundation, seeking / and Austrian the post-war restoration ofcommunication between the German academic communities on the ohehand and the kmerican andWest European academ- on the otherhand. is group I aS t - - I. FOUNDATIONS AND THEIR EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES Although charitable gifts are as old as civilization, it is only in very recent time that charitable or philanthropic foundations have 'come into action. The earlier charitable endowments of any magnitude were aimed at alleviating a problem or a distressful situation An orphan asylum or an old people's home, or free food for the hungry, Were instruments of philanthropy. But around 1900, the modern foundation was created as a means of attack on the causes of a social problem, so as to prevent or at least reduce the problem, and thus to nermanently,improve the human'condition. The support and application of education is an example of such a foundation activity. Two wealthy Americans at the beginning of the century began to turn their 'I, wealth to this kind of purpose. They were Andrew Carnegie and John Davison Rockefeller. Carnegie gave the money to create the Carnegie Institute of Technology in Pittsburit He provided funds_for public library buildings conditioned on the recip- tentcommutitty providing the site and guaranteeingan annual maintenance fund of not less than 10-percent of the building oast. By 1919, when he died, his money had gone into 2,509 library buildings at a cost of $56 million. Between 1901 and 1910 W. Carnegie set up six funds or trusts, including the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Education and thetarnegie Indownett for International Peace. Then, in 1911, he made a gift of $25 million to create the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Shortly afterward he gave an additional $100 million toCarnegie Corporation. John D. Rockefeller in 1892 started his gifts to the University of Chicago,, . which eventually reached $35