Ecological Relationships Between Threatened Caribou Herds and Their Habitat in the Central Rocky Mountains Ecoregion

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ecological Relationships Between Threatened Caribou Herds and Their Habitat in the Central Rocky Mountains Ecoregion Ecological relationships between threatened caribou herds and their habitat in the Central Rocky Mountains Ecoregion Pine Flats (Kennedy Siding Herd) Subalpine Forest Alpine (Parnsip Herd) (Quintette Herd ) Annual Report April 1, 2003 to March 31, 2004 Forestry Innovation Investment - Forest Science Program - Project #Y051035 Elena Jones, Dale Seip and Michael Gillingham October 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................................... 2 METHODS.................................................................................................................................................... 5 Study Area ................................................................................................................................... 5 Caribou Captures ......................................................................................................................... 9 Telemetry Locations .................................................................................................................. 10 Population Delineation .............................................................................................................. 11 Population Parameters ............................................................................................................... 11 Annual and Seasonal Ranges..................................................................................................... 11 Habitat Use ................................................................................................................................ 12 Caribou Track Transects............................................................................................................ 12 Permanent Snow Transects........................................................................................................13 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................. 16 Population Parameters ............................................................................................................... 16 Annual Home Ranges ................................................................................................................ 16 Seasonal Home Ranges.............................................................................................................. 20 Kennedy Siding..................................................................................................................................... 20 Moberly ................................................................................................................................................ 20 Quintette............................................................................................................................................... 20 Parsnip ................................................................................................................................................. 23 Habitat Use ................................................................................................................................ 23 Spring (April 15 to May 31) ................................................................................................................. 23 Summer/Fall (June 1 to October 15).................................................................................................... 31 Early Winter (October 16 to January 20) ............................................................................................ 35 Late Winter (January 21 to April 14)................................................................................................... 36 Caribou Track Transects............................................................................................................ 37 Early Winter ......................................................................................................................................... 37 Late Winter........................................................................................................................................... 39 Permanent Snow Transects........................................................................................................39 Kennedy Siding Pine Flats......................................................................................................... 43 Population and Ecotype Delineation.......................................................................................... 45 FUTURE WORK ........................................................................................................................................ 48 LITERATURE CITED................................................................................................................................ 49 APPENDICES............................................................................................................................................. 52 Appendix I. Collar status and telemetry locations - April 1, 2003 to March 31, 2004............. 52 Appendix II. Caribou track transect and permanent snow transect distribution. ...................... 53 Appendix III. Number of caribou track transects by population and habitat type.................... 54 Appendix IV. Data Forms......................................................................................................... 55 Appendix V. Habitat and Snow Classification Key.................................................................. 64 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding for this project was provided by FII (Forestry Innovation Investment), with additional support from Canadian Forests Products Ltd. and the McGregor Model Forest. Further support was provided by the B.C. Ministry of Forests, B.C. Ministry of Water, Lands and Air Protection and the University of Northern British Columbia. We would like to extend a warm thank you to the many people who have contributed to this study. Glen Watts, Brad Culling, Greg Altoff and Andrew Moore did a tremendous job of capturing and collaring caribou. Special thanks to helicopter pilots Ken Knight, Chris Norman and Robert Aylwin (Pacific Western Helicopters Ltd.) who got us safely into the alpine areas on windy days and small meadows under all conditions. Larry Frey (Northern Thunderbird Air Inc.) was the fixed-wing pilot for the majority of telemetry flights and was extremely skilled in navigating through the mountainous terrain to obtain caribou locations. Tracy Hunter was invaluable as a field technician and was extremely resourceful during the initial stages of data collection. Her suggestions were integral in fine-tuning the field methods. Mike Wolowitz was instrumental in technical GIS assistance and initial telemetry flights. This study would not have been successful without the guidance of Katherine Parker (University of Northern British Columbia) and Doug Heard (B.C. Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection), who provided invaluable recommendations on all aspects of this study. Finally, thanks to Jeremy Ayotte and Dave Gustine for their assistance and support throughout this field season. 1 INTRODUCTION Woodland caribou in central British Columbia have been classified into two ecotypes: mountain and northern (Bergerud 1978, Stevenson and Hatler 1985, Heard and Vagt 1998). These ecotypes are distinguished by their use of different habitat types and forage species throughout the winter (Stevenson and Hatler 1985). Variation in habitat use is believed to be the result of adaptations to environmental and physical habitat characteristics across the range of woodland caribou (Bergerud 1978). Mountain caribou inhabit mountainous terrain within the southeastern portion of British Columbia (Stevenson and Hatler 1985, Heard and Vagt 1998). This area is characterized by heavy snowfall during the winter (Stevenson and Hatler 1985), which limits caribou access to terrestrial vegetation. As such, mountain caribou forage almost exclusively on arboreal lichens (Freddy and Erickson 1975, Bloomfield 1980, Antifeau 1987, Simpson et al. 1987, Stevenson and Hatler 1985, Seip 1992). Mountain caribou typically winter in old-growth subalpine forests, where arboreal lichens are available and abundant (Freddy and Erickson 1975, Antifeau 1987, Simpson et al. 1987, Rominger and Oldemeyer 1989, Stevenson et al. 1994, Apps et al. 2001). Northern caribou inhabit the mountainous northern and western areas of British Columbia. Snowfall is comparatively lower in these areas (Bergerud 1978, Stevenson and Hatler 1985) and northern caribou are able to crater through the snow to access terrestrial vegetation (Stevenson and Hatler 1985, Cichowski 1993, Wood 1996, Johnson et al. 2000). These caribou forage primarily on terrestrial lichens during the winter in either high-elevation, wind-swept habitat or in lower-elevation pine (Pinus contorta) or black-spruce (Picea mariana) forests (Cichowski 1993, Wood 1996, Johnson et al. 2000), although foraging for arboreal lichens in subalpine forests has been documented (Cichowski 1993, Wood 1996, Johnson et al. 2000) and is sometimes prevalent (Poole et al. 2000). 2 The transition zone between the northern and mountain caribou ecotypes occurs in central British Columbia and initially was thought to follow the height
Recommended publications
  • Project Description Proposed Natural Gas Transmission System
    Project Description Proposed Natural Gas Transmission System Northeast British Columbia to the Prince Rupert Area Suite 2600, 425 - 1st Street SW Suite 1100, 1055 West Georgia Street Fifth Avenue Place, East Tower PO Box 11162 Calgary, AB T2P 3L8 Vancouver, BC V6E 3R5 October 2012 Table of Contents 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 PROPONENT INFORMATION ............................................................................................................. 8 3.0 GENERAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION ............................................................................................ 9 4.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................... 10 4.1 Project Description............................................................................................................. 10 4.2 Alternative Means to Carry Out the Project ........................................................................ 11 4.3 Right-of-Way Characteristics ............................................................................................. 12 4.4 Project Activities ................................................................................................................ 13 4.5 Accidents and Malfunctions ............................................................................................... 18 4.6 Project Development Schedule .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E-1-1: Acid Rock Drainage and Metal Leaching Field Investigation
    AMEC Earth & Environmental a division of AMEC Americas Limited 2227 Douglas Road, Burnaby, BC Canada V5C 5A9 Tel +1 (604) 294-3811 Fax +1 (604) 294-4664 www.amec.com Acid Rock Drainage and Metal Leaching Field Investigation Enbridge Northern Gateway Project Submitted to: Northern Gateway Pipelines Inc. Calgary, AB Submitted by: AMEC Earth & Environmental, a division of AMEC Americas Limited Burnaby, BC October 2009 Revised February 16, 2010 AMEC File: EG09260.2300 Document Control No.: 1128-RG-20091022 Northern Gateway Pipelines Inc. Acid Rock Drainage and Metal Leaching Field Investigation October 2009 Revised February 16, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .......................................................................................................... v GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................ vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................. 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 2 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Scope of Work ............................................................................................................. 2 2.0 INTRODUCTION TO ACID ROCK DRAINAGE ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Glaciers of the Canadian Rockies
    Glaciers of North America— GLACIERS OF CANADA GLACIERS OF THE CANADIAN ROCKIES By C. SIMON L. OMMANNEY SATELLITE IMAGE ATLAS OF GLACIERS OF THE WORLD Edited by RICHARD S. WILLIAMS, Jr., and JANE G. FERRIGNO U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1386–J–1 The Rocky Mountains of Canada include four distinct ranges from the U.S. border to northern British Columbia: Border, Continental, Hart, and Muskwa Ranges. They cover about 170,000 km2, are about 150 km wide, and have an estimated glacierized area of 38,613 km2. Mount Robson, at 3,954 m, is the highest peak. Glaciers range in size from ice fields, with major outlet glaciers, to glacierets. Small mountain-type glaciers in cirques, niches, and ice aprons are scattered throughout the ranges. Ice-cored moraines and rock glaciers are also common CONTENTS Page Abstract ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- J199 Introduction----------------------------------------------------------------------- 199 FIGURE 1. Mountain ranges of the southern Rocky Mountains------------ 201 2. Mountain ranges of the northern Rocky Mountains ------------ 202 3. Oblique aerial photograph of Mount Assiniboine, Banff National Park, Rocky Mountains----------------------------- 203 4. Sketch map showing glaciers of the Canadian Rocky Mountains -------------------------------------------- 204 5. Photograph of the Victoria Glacier, Rocky Mountains, Alberta, in August 1973 -------------------------------------- 209 TABLE 1. Named glaciers of the Rocky Mountains cited in the chapter
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Minerals Industrial Minerals
    37th FORUM on the GEOLOGY of INDUSTRIAL MINERALS MAY 23-25, 2001 VICTORIA, BC, CANADA Industrial Minerals with emphasis on Western North America Editors: George J. Simandl, William J. McMillan and Nicole D. Robinson Ministry of Energy and Mines Geological Survey Branch Paper 2004-2 Recommended reference style for individual papers: Nelson, J. (2004): The Geology of Western North America (Abridged Version);in G.J. Simandl, W.J. McMillan and N.D. Robinson, Editors, 37th Annual Forum on Industrial Minerals Proceedings, Industrial Minerals with emphasis on Western North America, British Columbia Ministry of Energy and Mines, Geological Survey Branch, Paper 2004-2, pages 1-2. Cover photo: Curved, grey magnesite crystals in a black dolomite matrix. Mount Brussilof magnesite mine, British Columbia, Canada Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Data Forum on the Geology of Industrial Minerals (37th : 2001 : Victoria, B.C.) Industrial mineral with emphasis on western North America (Paper / Geological Survey Branch) ; 2004-2) "37th Forum on the Geology of Industrial Minerals, May 23-25, 2001, Victoria, B.C. Canada." Includes bibliographical references: p. ISBN 0-7726-5270-8 1. Industrial minerals - Geology - North America - Congresses. 2. Ore deposits - North America - Congresses. 3. Geology, Economic - North America - Congresses. I. Simandl, George J. (George Jiri), 1953- . II. McMillan, W. J. (William John). III. Robinson, Nicole D. IV. British Columbia. Ministry of Energy and Mines. V. British Columbia. Geological Survey Branch. VI. Title. VII. Series: Paper (British Columbia. Geological Survey Branch) ; 2004-2. TN22.F67 2005 553.6'097 C2005-960004-7 Recommended reference style for individual papers: Nelson, J.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Cumulative Impa Wide-Ranging Species Acro Peace
    Assessing Cumulative Impacts to Wide -Ranging Species Across the Peace Break Region of Northeastern British Columbia Prepared by: Clayton Apps, PhD, RPBio Aspen Wildlife Research Inc. For and in collaboration with: FINAL REPORT Version 3.0 June 2013 This report is formatted for double-sided printing PREFACE This report was prepared under the auspices of the Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative (Y2Y). The impetus for the assessment herein was concern regarding contribution of the Site-C dam and hydro-electric development on the Peace River toward adverse regional cumulative effects. Because the underlying mandate of Y2Y pertains to advocacy for ecological connectivity from local to continental scales, my focus in this assessment has been on wide-ranging species potentially sensitive to broad-scale population fragmentation. For these species, assessing cumulative impacts specific to any one development must be considered in the context of regional populations and underlying habitat conditions and influential human activities. Hence, it is in the context of regional- scale assessment that this report considers the impacts of the Site-C development and its constraints to future conservation opportunities. While this report may be submitted by Y2Y for consideration in the environmental assessment process for the Site-C development, it is also intended to inform regional conservation planning through a wider audience that includes resource managers, resource stakeholders, private land stewards, environmental advocates, the general public, and other researchers. Recommended Citation: Apps, C. 2013. Assessing cumulative impacts to wide-ranging species across the Peace Break region of northeastern British Columbia. Version 3.0 Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative, Canmore Alberta.
    [Show full text]
  • Landforms of British Columbia 1976
    Landforms of British Columbia A Physiographic Outline bY Bulletin 48 Stuart S. Holland 1976 FOREWORD British Columbia has more variety in its climate and scenery than any other Province of Canada. The mildness and wetness of the southern coast is in sharp contrast with the extreme dryness of the desert areas in the interior and the harshness of subarctic conditions in the northernmost parts. Moreover, in every part, climate and vegetation vary with altitude and to a lesser extent with configuration of the land. Although the Province includes almost a thousand-mile length of one of the world’s greatest mountain chains, that which borders the north Pacitic Ocean, it is not all mountainous but contains a variety of lowlands and intermontane areas. Because of the abundance of mountains, and because of its short history of settlement, a good deal of British Columbia is almost uninhabited and almost unknown. However, the concept of accessibility has changed profoundly in the past 20 years, owing largely to the use of aircraft and particularly the helicopter. There is now complete coverage by air photography, and by far the largest part of the Province has been mapped topographically and geologically. In the same period of time the highways have been very greatly improved, and the secondary roads are much more numerous. The averagecitizen is much more aware of his Province, but, although knowledge has greatly improved with access,many misconceptions remain on the part of the general public as to the precise meaning even of such names as Cascade Mountains, Fraser Plateau, and many others.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Gastropods of the Peace River – Northern Rockies Region of British Columbia
    Terrestrial Gastropods of the Peace River – Northern Rockies Region of British Columbia ROBERT G. FORSYTH Research Associate, Royal BC Museum, Victoria 675 Belleville Street, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada V8W 9W2 http://www.royalbcmuseum.bc.ca LIVING LANDSCAPES: PEACE RIVER – NORTHERN ROCKIES http://livinglandscapes.bc.ca © 2005 Royal British Columbia Museum All photographs and illustrations © Robert G. Forsyth. On preceding page: Live Vitrina pellucida (see page 12) along the Alaska Highway near Cranberry Rapids, Liard River (RBCM 004-00130-007). Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Data Forsyth, Robert G. Terrestrial gastropods of the Peace River – Northern Rockies Region of British Columbia [electronic resource] Available on the Internet. “Living Landscapes: Peace River – Northern Rockies” Includes bibliographical references: p. ISBN 0-7726-5288-0 1. Gastropoda – Peace River Region (B.C. and Alta). 2. Gastropoda – British Columbia – Northern Rockies. I. Royal BC Museum. II. Title. QL430.4.F67 2005 594.3’0971187 C2005-960031-4 This report can be cited as: Forsyth, Robert G. 2005. Terrestrial Gastropods of the of the Peace River – Northern Rockies Region of British Columbia. Royal British Columbia Museum, Living Landscapes. Available at http://www. livinglandscapes.bc.ca/prnr/prnr_snails/index.html [HTML version] or http://www.livinglandscapes.bc.ca/prnr/prnr_snails/PRNR-Snails. pdf [PDF version]. Terrestrial Gastropods of the Peace River – Northern Rockies Region of British Columbia ROBERT G. FORSYTH* Research Associate, Royal BC Museum, Victoria 675 Belleville Street, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada V8W 9W2 *Mailing address: Box 3804, Smithers, British Columbia, Canada V0J 2N0 ABSTRACT — For the first time, information on the ter- Annotated Species List .
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to the Ecoregions of British Columbia
    An Introduction to the Ecoregions of British Columbia Dennis A. Demarchi Third Edition March, 2011 Ecosystem Information Section Ministry of Environment Victoria, British Columbia An Introduction to the Ecoregions of British Columbia 2 Table of Contents Overview ............................................................................................................................... 4 Ecoregions Classification Order .......................................................................................................5 PART I: Ecoregion Classification Background ........................................................................ 15 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 15 British Columbia's Environment – The Setting ............................................................................... 16 The British Columbia Ecoregion Classification ................................................................................ 18 Uses of the British Columbia Ecosystem Classification ....................................................................... 20 PART II: Ecoregion Unit Descriptions .................................................................................... 22 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 22 Cool Oceanic Ecodomain ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Landforms of British Columbia 1976
    Landforms of British Columbia A Physiographic Outline bY Bulletin 48 Stuart S. Holland 1976 FOREWORD British Columbia has more variety in its climate and scenery than any other Province of Canada. The mildness and wetness of the southern coast is in sharp contrast with the extreme dryness of the desert areas in the interior and the harshness of subarctic conditions in the northernmost parts. Moreover, in every part, climate and vegetation vary with altitude and to a lesser extent with configuration of the land. Although the Province includes almost a thousand-mile length of one of the world’s greatest mountain chains, that which borders the north Pacitic Ocean, it is not all mountainous but contains a variety of lowlands and intermontane areas. Because of the abundance of mountains, and because of its short history of settlement, a good deal of British Columbia is almost uninhabited and almost unknown. However, the concept of accessibility has changed profoundly in the past 20 years, owing largely to the use of aircraft and particularly the helicopter. There is now complete coverage by air photography, and by far the largest part of the Province has been mapped topographically and geologically. In the same period of time the highways have been very greatly improved, and the secondary roads are much more numerous. The averagecitizen is much more aware of his Province, but, although knowledge has greatly improved with access,many misconceptions remain on the part of the general public as to the precise meaning even of such names as Cascade Mountains, Fraser Plateau, and many others.
    [Show full text]