DOCSLIB.ORG

Industrial Minerals Industrial Minerals

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

37th FORUM on the GEOLOGY of INDUSTRIAL MINERALS MAY 23-25, 2001 VICTORIA, BC, CANADA Industrial Minerals with emphasis on Western North America Editors: George J. Simandl, William J. McMillan and Nicole D. Robinson Ministry of Energy and Mines Geological Survey Branch Paper 2004-2 Recommended reference style for individual papers: Nelson, J. (2004): The Geology of Western North America (Abridged Version);in G.J. Simandl, W.J. McMillan and N.D. Robinson, Editors, 37th Annual Forum on Industrial Minerals Proceedings, Industrial Minerals with emphasis on Western North America, British Columbia Ministry of Energy and Mines, Geological Survey Branch, Paper 2004-2, pages 1-2. Cover photo: Curved, grey magnesite crystals in a black dolomite matrix. Mount Brussilof magnesite mine, British Columbia, Canada Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Data Forum on the Geology of Industrial Minerals (37th : 2001 : Victoria, B.C.) Industrial mineral with emphasis on western North America (Paper / Geological Survey Branch) ; 2004-2) "37th Forum on the Geology of Industrial Minerals, May 23-25, 2001, Victoria, B.C. Canada." Includes bibliographical references: p. ISBN 0-7726-5270-8 1. Industrial minerals - Geology - North America - Congresses. 2. Ore deposits - North America - Congresses. 3. Geology, Economic - North America - Congresses. I. Simandl, George J. (George Jiri), 1953- . II. McMillan, W. J. (William John). III. Robinson, Nicole D. IV. British Columbia. Ministry of Energy and Mines. V. British Columbia. Geological Survey Branch. VI. Title. VII. Series: Paper (British Columbia. Geological Survey Branch) ; 2004-2. TN22.F67 2005 553.6'097 C2005-960004-7 Recommended reference style for individual papers: Nelson, J. (2004): The Geology of Western North America (Abridged Version);in G.J. Simandl, W.J. McMillan and N.D. Robinson, Editors, 37th Annual Forum on Industrial Minerals Proceedings, Industrial Minerals with emphasis on Western North America, British Columbia Ministry of Energy and Mines, Geological Survey Branch, Paper 2004-2, pages 1-2. Cover photo: Curved, grey magnesite crystals in a black dolomite matrix. Mount Brussilof magnesite mine, British Columbia, Canada Preface The 37th Forum on the Geology of Industrial Minerals was held at the Victoria Conference Centre from May 23 -25, 2001. The Forum on the Geology of Industrial Minerals has a long tradition. It was initiated by the late Professor Robert Bates of the Ohio State University and has been held on an annual basis for the last 37 years. Thirty-one meetings have been held in the USA, one in Bath, England, and five in Canada including the 37th Forum, here in Victoria. The 37th Forum in Victoria was organized by the British Columbia Ministry of Energy and Mines (Geological Survey Branch), Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, and University of Victoria’s Centre for Earth and Ocean Research. The Forum was co-sponsored by: Baymag Mines Co. Ltd, Lafarge Canada Inc., Imasco, Industrial Minerals Journal, Canmark International Resources Inc., Yorkton Securities and BHP. Westroc, Cominco, DeBeers Canada, and Diavik Mines helped keep the cost of field trips affordable. The technical sessions focused on aggregates and transportation; value-added industrial minerals; diamonds in Canada; dimension stone; magnesite, magnesia, and magnesium metal; and exploration for and evaluation of industrial mineral deposits. There were 48 oral presentations and over 40 poster displays. As part of the 37th Forum, eight field trips were planned. Six of these took place in southwestern BC, one trip transected the Cordillera from Calgary to Victoria, and the other visited the new diamond mines in the Northwest Territories. There were at least 50 companies that agreed to show us their operations and to share their knowledge. The field trip leaders spent a lot of time and effort to make it possible for participants to appreciate the industrial minerals wealth and potential of British Columbia. These leaders are Stan Krukowski of Graymont, Don Gunning and Dan Hora - consultants, Roger Paulen, Amy Boulton and Melissa Rotella - students of the School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, UVic, and Victor Levson of the British Columbia Ministry of Energy and Mines. Susan Dunlop and Kathy Watson of UVic’s Centre for Earth and Ocean Research efficiently handled the administrative part of the conference with assistance from UVic SEOS student Michelle Landry. Janet Holland of the BC Geological Survey formatted the extended abstract book and expertly handled the accompanying guest program. On site co-ordination of the poster session was handled by Mike Fournier of the BC Geological Survey. Support of the Forum through corporate and commercial displays by Homegold Resources, Crystal Graphite Corporation, Electra Gold Ltd., Bondar Clegg, XRAL Laboratories, Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, Driftwood Creek Magnesite, and Blubber Bay Quarry (Ash Grove Cement Co.) is also appreciated. George Simandl May 10, 2001 iii FIELD TRIP SPONSORS The following companies have helped offset the cost of the field trips: BHP Ashgrove Cement Company, Blubber Bay Quarry Imperial Limestone Co. Ltd. Pacific Coastal Airlines Ltd. Texada Quarrying Ltd. Graymont Western Canada Inc. Cominco Ltd. Westroc Ltd. EXHIBITORS 1. Bondar Clegg Mineral Laboratories, Vancouver, BC 2. Homegold Resources, Port Coquitlam, BC 3. Electra Gold Ltd., Vancouver, BC 4. XRAL Laboratories, Toronto, Ontario 5. British Columbia Ministry of Energy and Mines 6. BC Geological Survey - The Map Place 7. BC & Yukon Chamber of Mines/Mining Association of BC 8. Centre for Earth and Ocean Research, University of Victoria 9. Jade West Resources Ltd., South Surrey, BC and BC Geological Survey, Victoria, BC 10.Driftwood Creek Magnesite, Kimberley, BC 11. “Industrial Minerals”, England 12. Blubber Bay Quarry, Blubber Bay, BC 13. Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines iv MAJOR SPONSORS Ministry of Energy and Mines v CONFERENCES AND PUBLICATIONS Date Location Publication 1st 1965 Columbus, Ohio 1966, Ohio Journal of Science , 66 (2), p. 97-191 2nd 1966 Bloomington, Indiana 1966, Indiana Geological Survey, 197p. (no publication number given) 3rd 1967 Lawrence, Kansas 1967, State Geological Survey of Kansas Special Distribution Publication 34, 183p. 4th 1968 Austin, Texas 1968, Texas Bureau of Economic Geology , 174 p. (no publication number given) 5th 1969 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 1970, Pennsylvania Geological Survey, 4th Series, Bulletin M64, 271p. 6th 1970 Ann Arbor, Michigan 1970, Michigan Geological Survey Miscellany 1, 155p. 7th 1971 Tampa, Florida 1972, Florida Bureau of Geology Special Publication 17, 228p. 8th 1972 Iowa City, Iowa 1973, Iowa Geological Survey Public Information Circular 5, 189p. 9th 1973 Paducah, Kentucky 1974, Kentucky Geological Survey Series X, Special Publication 22, 107p. 10th 1974 Columbus, Ohio 1974, Ohio Geological Survey Miscellaneous Report 1, 100p. 11th 1975 Kalispell, Montana 1976, Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Special Publication 74, 186p. 12th 1976 Atlanta, Georgia 1978, Georgia Geologic Survey Information Circular 49, 78p. 13th 1977 Norman, Oklahoma 1978, Oklahoma Geological Survey Circular 79, 107p. 14th 1978 Albany, New York 1980, New York State Museum Bulletin 436, 120p. 15th 1979 Golden, Colorado 1980, Colorado Geological Survey Resource Series 8, 126p. 16th 1980 St. Louis, Missouri 1980, Missouri Division of Geology and Land Survey Special Publication 7, 78p. 17th 1981 Albuquerque, New Mexico 1982, New Mexico Bureau of Mines & Mineral Resources Circular 182, 108p. 18th 1982 Bloomington, Indiana 1983, Indiana Geological Survey Occasional Paper 37, 251p. 19th 1983 Toronto, Ontario, Canada 1983, Ontario Geological Survey Miscellaneous Paper 114, 216p. 20th 1984 Baltimore, Maryland 1985, Maryland Geological Survey Special Publication 2, 152p. 21st 1985 Tucson, Arizona 1987, Arizona Geological Survey Special Paper 4, 134p. 22nd 1986 Little Rock, Arkansas 1988, Arkansas Geological Commission Miscellaneous Publication MP-21, 115p. 23rd 1987 North Aurora, Illinois 1989, Ilinois State Geological Survey IMN 102, 105p. 24th 1988 Greenville, South Carolina 1990, South Carolina Geological Survey Miscellaneous Publication , 155p. (no publication number given) 25th 1989 Portland, Oregon 1990, Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Special Paper 23, 100p. 26th 1990 Charlottesville, Virginia 1992, Virginia Division of Mineral Resources Publication 119, 188p. 27th 1991 Banff, Alberta, Canada 1992, Alberta Geological Survey, Alberta Research Council, Information Series 115, 217p. 28th 1992 Martinsburg, West Virginia 1995, West Virginia Geologic and Economic Survey and U.S. Bureau of Mines Circular C-46, 227p. 29th 1993 Long Beach, California 1995, California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 110, 355p. 30th 1994 Fredericton, New Brunswick and 1995, New Brunswick Department of Natural Resources Energy, Minerals and Energy Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada Division Miscellaneous Report 16, 261p. 31st 1995 El Paso, Texas 1996, New Mexico Bureau of Mines & Mineral Resources Bulletin 154, 330p. 32nd 1996 Laramie, Wyoming 1997, Wyoming State Geological Survey Public Information Circular 38, 326p. 33rd 1997 Quebec City, Quebec, Canada 1998, Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum Special Volume 50, 288p. 34th 1998 Norman, Oklahoma 1999, Oklahoma Geological Survey Circular 102, 364p. 35th 1999 Salt Lake City, Utah 2001, Utah Geological Survey
Recommended publications
  • Dustin M. Schroeder

    Dustin M. Schroeder

    Dustin M. Schroeder Assistant Professor of Geophysics Department of Geophysics, School of Earth, Energy, and Environmental Sciences 397 Panama Mall, Mitchell Building 361, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 [email protected], 440.567.8343 EDUCATION 2014 Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas, Austin, TX Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) in Geophysics 2007 Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering (B.S.E.E.), departmental honors, magna cum laude Bachelor of Arts (B.A.) in Physics, magna cum laude, minors in Mathematics and Philosophy PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 2016 – present Assistant Professor of Geophysics, Stanford University 2017 – present Assistant Professor (by courtesy) of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University 2020 – present Center Fellow (by courtesy), Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment 2020 – present Faculty Affiliate, Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence 2021 – present Senior Member, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology 2016 – 2020 Faculty Affiliate, Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment 2014 – 2016 Radar Systems Engineer, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology 2012 Graduate Researcher, Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University 2008 – 2014 Graduate Researcher, University of Texas Institute for Geophysics 2007 – 2008 Platform Hardware Engineer, Freescale Semiconductor SELECTED AWARDS 2021 Symposium Prize Paper Award, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Society 2020 Excellence in Teaching Award, Stanford School of Earth, Energy, and Environmental Sciences 2019 Senior Member, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers 2018 CAREER Award, National Science Foundation 2018 LInC Fellow, Woods Institute, Stanford University 2016 Frederick E. Terman Fellow, Stanford University 2015 JPL Team Award, Europa Mission Instrument Proposal 2014 Best Graduate Student Paper, Jackson School of Geosciences 2014 National Science Olympiad Heart of Gold Award for Service to Science Education 2013 Best Ph.D.
  • Aquatic ERA Summary Report

    Aquatic ERA Summary Report

    SUMMARY REPORT TECK COMINCO METALS LTD. AQUATIC ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT Issue Date: SeptemberDecember 20102007 Prepared by: Stella Swanson Golder Associates, Calgary, (now Swanson Environmental Strategies Ltd.) Prepared for: Teck Cominco Metals Ltd. (now Teck Metals Ltd.) Trail, British Columbia Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 1 Background to the Risk Assessment .............................................................. 1 Study Area Description ................................................................................... 2 OVERALL APPROACH USED FOR THE ERA 3 The Past: Cominco smelter Bottom-Up and Top-Down Perspectives ......................................................... 3 Problem Formulation: The First Step in Risk Assessment .............................. 5 Sequential Analysis of Lines of Evidence (SALE): a New Method for Assembling a Weight-of-Evidence for Risk ................................................ 5 Description of the SALE Process .................................................................... 6 The Present: Teck Cominco External Review of the ERA Approach ............................................................ 7 smelter RESULTS OF THE PROBLEM FORMULATION: THE FIRST STAGE OF THE RISK ASSESSMENT 7 Risk Management Goal and Objectives .......................................................... 7 Meeting the Risk Management Objectives ............................................. 7 Assessment Endpoints and Measures: Specific Aquatic Ecosystem Components and Characteristics to be Protected ...................................
  • Microfossils of the Early Archean Apex Chert: New Evidence of the Antiquity of Life Author(S): J

    Microfossils of the Early Archean Apex Chert: New Evidence of the Antiquity of Life Author(S): J

    Microfossils of the Early Archean Apex Chert: New Evidence of the Antiquity of Life Author(s): J. William Schopf Reviewed work(s): Source: Science, New Series, Vol. 260, No. 5108 (Apr. 30, 1993), pp. 640-646 Published by: American Association for the Advancement of Science Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2881249 . Accessed: 07/04/2012 21:09 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. American Association for the Advancement of Science is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Science. http://www.jstor.org REFERENCESAND NOTES 9. Y. Hiwatari,in Molecular Dynamics Simulations, F. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1988), vol. 1, p. Yonezawa, Ed., vol. 113 of Springer Series in 247. 1. H. Takayama, News Letter No. 1 (Research Group Solid State Sciences (Springer-Verlag, Heidel- 23. F. Yonezawa, S. Sakamoto, M. Hori, J. Non-Ctyst. on a new project, "Computational Physics as a berg, 1992), p. 32. Solids 137, 135 (1991). New Frontier in Condensed Matter Research" 10. S. Fujiwara and F. Yonezawa, in preparation. 24. F. Yonezawa and S. Sakamoto, Optoelectronics- under the support of the Grant-in-Aidfor Scientific 11.
  • Age and Origin of Silicocarbonate Pegmatites of the Adirondack Region

    Age and Origin of Silicocarbonate Pegmatites of the Adirondack Region

    minerals Article Age and Origin of Silicocarbonate Pegmatites of the Adirondack Region Jeffrey Chiarenzelli 1,*, Marian Lupulescu 2, George Robinson 1, David Bailey 3 and Jared Singer 4 1 Department of Geology, St. Lawrence University, Canton, NY 13617, USA 2 New York State Museum, Research and Collections, Albany, NY 12230, USA 3 Geosciences Department, Hamilton College, Clinton, NY 13323, USA 4 Earth and Environmental Sciences, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Rensselaer, NY 12180, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-315-229-5202 Received: 24 July 2019; Accepted: 19 August 2019; Published: 23 August 2019 Abstract: Silicocarbonate pegmatites from the southern Grenville Province have provided exceptionally large crystal specimens for more than a century. Their mineral parageneses include euhedral calc–silicate minerals such as amphibole, clinopyroxene, and scapolite within a calcite matrix. Crystals can reach a meter or more in long dimension. Minor and locally abundant phases reflect local bedrock compositions and include albite, apatite, perthitic microcline, phlogopite, zircon, tourmaline, titanite, danburite, uraninite, sulfides, and many other minerals. Across the Adirondack Region, individual exposures are of limited aerial extent (<10,000 m2), crosscut metasedimentary rocks, especially calc–silicate gneisses and marbles, are undeformed and are spatially and temporally associated with granitic pegmatites. Zircon U–Pb results include both Shawinigan (circa 1165 Ma) and Ottawan (circa 1050 Ma) intrusion ages, separated by the Carthage-Colton shear zone. Those of Shawinigan age (Lowlands) correspond with the timing of voluminous A-type granitic magmatism, whereas Ottawan ages (Highlands) are temporally related to orogenic collapse, voluminous leucogranite and granitic pegmatite intrusion, iron and garnet ore development, and pervasive localized hydrothermal alteration.
  • The Wittelsbach-Graff and Hope Diamonds: Not Cut from the Same Rough

    The Wittelsbach-Graff and Hope Diamonds: Not Cut from the Same Rough

    THE WITTELSBACH-GRAFF AND HOPE DIAMONDS: NOT CUT FROM THE SAME ROUGH Eloïse Gaillou, Wuyi Wang, Jeffrey E. Post, John M. King, James E. Butler, Alan T. Collins, and Thomas M. Moses Two historic blue diamonds, the Hope and the Wittelsbach-Graff, appeared together for the first time at the Smithsonian Institution in 2010. Both diamonds were apparently purchased in India in the 17th century and later belonged to European royalty. In addition to the parallels in their histo- ries, their comparable color and bright, long-lasting orange-red phosphorescence have led to speculation that these two diamonds might have come from the same piece of rough. Although the diamonds are similar spectroscopically, their dislocation patterns observed with the DiamondView differ in scale and texture, and they do not show the same internal strain features. The results indicate that the two diamonds did not originate from the same crystal, though they likely experienced similar geologic histories. he earliest records of the famous Hope and Adornment (Toison d’Or de la Parure de Couleur) in Wittelsbach-Graff diamonds (figure 1) show 1749, but was stolen in 1792 during the French T them in the possession of prominent Revolution. Twenty years later, a 45.52 ct blue dia- European royal families in the mid-17th century. mond appeared for sale in London and eventually They were undoubtedly mined in India, the world’s became part of the collection of Henry Philip Hope. only commercial source of diamonds at that time. Recent computer modeling studies have established The original ancestor of the Hope diamond was that the Hope diamond was cut from the French an approximately 115 ct stone (the Tavernier Blue) Blue, presumably to disguise its identity after the that Jean-Baptiste Tavernier sold to Louis XIV of theft (Attaway, 2005; Farges et al., 2009; Sucher et France in 1668.
  • Teck in Its Tweens: an Update on 12 Years of Litigation Over the Canadian Smelter

    Teck in Its Tweens: an Update on 12 Years of Litigation Over the Canadian Smelter

    Teck in its Tweens: An Update on 12 Years of Litigation Over The Canadian Smelter Kelly T. Wood Assistant Attorney General Just over the border from Northeast Washington, in the town of Trail, B.C., the Teck Metals (formerly Teck Cominco) smelter hovers over the Columbia River like a bird of prey. In 2002 and 2003, swimmer Christopher Swain swam the length of the Columbia—from its Canadian headwaters to the Pacific Ocean—in an effort to bring attention to pollution and blockage issues. Passing the Teck smelter, Swain recalled the sight as he took slow freestyle-swim breaths beneath the smelter: “Water. Mordor. Water. Mordor. Water. Mordor . .” The Trail smelter is currently the largest lead/zinc smelter in the world, a title it recently regained after a downturn in emerging markets caused the prices of metals to take a dive, and a number of other smelters to close, in the early 2010s. For a period of 100+ years, Teck discharged hazardous byproducts from its smelting operations into the Columbia River, both liquid effluent and granulated slag. Up to 145,000 tons of slag went into the Columbia on an annual basis, the vast majority of which was dutifully carried downstream the 10 river miles to Washington. So much slag (millions of tons) washed downstream from the Trail smelter, that a “black sand” beach formed in a backwater eddy north of the town of Northport. Over time, Teck slag physically decays in the river, leaching heavy metals to the surrounding environment. And, other metals in Teck’s liquid effluent discharges also adsorbed to river sediment and settled into the quiescent waters of Lake Roosevelt.
  • Building Stones of the National Mall

    Building Stones of the National Mall

    The Geological Society of America Field Guide 40 2015 Building stones of the National Mall Richard A. Livingston Materials Science and Engineering Department, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA Carol A. Grissom Smithsonian Museum Conservation Institute, 4210 Silver Hill Road, Suitland, Maryland 20746, USA Emily M. Aloiz John Milner Associates Preservation, 3200 Lee Highway, Arlington, Virginia 22207, USA ABSTRACT This guide accompanies a walking tour of sites where masonry was employed on or near the National Mall in Washington, D.C. It begins with an overview of the geological setting of the city and development of the Mall. Each federal monument or building on the tour is briefly described, followed by information about its exterior stonework. The focus is on masonry buildings of the Smithsonian Institution, which date from 1847 with the inception of construction for the Smithsonian Castle and continue up to completion of the National Museum of the American Indian in 2004. The building stones on the tour are representative of the development of the Ameri­ can dimension stone industry with respect to geology, quarrying techniques, and style over more than two centuries. Details are provided for locally quarried stones used for the earliest buildings in the capital, including A quia Creek sandstone (U.S. Capitol and Patent Office Building), Seneca Red sandstone (Smithsonian Castle), Cockeysville Marble (Washington Monument), and Piedmont bedrock (lockkeeper's house). Fol­ lowing improvement in the transportation system, buildings and monuments were constructed with stones from other regions, including Shelburne Marble from Ver­ mont, Salem Limestone from Indiana, Holston Limestone from Tennessee, Kasota stone from Minnesota, and a variety of granites from several states.
  • Ernest Guiraud: a Biography and Catalogue of Works

    Ernest Guiraud: a Biography and Catalogue of Works

    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1990 Ernest Guiraud: A Biography and Catalogue of Works. Daniel O. Weilbaecher Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Weilbaecher, Daniel O., "Ernest Guiraud: A Biography and Catalogue of Works." (1990). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 4959. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/4959 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
  • An Alluvial Fan Model for Mineral Exploration, Report of Investigations No

    An Alluvial Fan Model for Mineral Exploration, Report of Investigations No

    Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Compliance Certification Application Reference 428 McGowen, J.H., and Groat, C. G. 1971. Van Horn Sandstone, West Texas: An Alluvial Fan Model for Mineral Exploration, Report of Investigations No. 72. Bureau of Economic Geology, Austin, TX. Submitted in accordance with 40 CFR 5194.13, Submission of Reference Materials. - t*- An Allurjial Fan kdel for Mineral Exploration J. H. McGowen and C. G. Groat BUREAU OF ECONOMIC GEOLOGY The University of Texas at Austin Austin, Texas 78712 W. L. Fisher. Director Report of Investigations-No. 72 Van Horn Sandstone, West Texas: An Alluvial Fan Model for Mineral Exploration BY J. H. McGowen and C. G. Groat 1971 Second Printing, December 1975 Third Printing, October 1982 Abstract . .......... Proximal fan ........ Introduction ........... Mid-fan .......... General description .......... Distal fan ......... Geologic setting ........... Main braided channels .... Van Horn Sandstone: a large alluvial fan system Braided distributaries ..... Sedimrntology ........... Braided interlobe area .... Facies ............. Summary ........... Proximal f'acies......... Compositionandmineralogy ...... Massive l~oulder1. cds ....... Gravel composition ........ iilterriating gravel and thin sand beds . Sandstone petrography ....... Thick sand and muddy sand of the proxi- Quartz ........... mal facics .......... Feldspar ........... Other feat.urcs of the proximal facies . Rock fragments ........ Mid-fan l'acies .......... Hematite .......... F:tcies dcscrlptioli ........ Cement and matrix
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for Canada (Alberta – VE6) Summits on the Air

    Summits on the Air – ARM for Canada (Alberta – VE6) Summits on the Air

    Summits on the Air – ARM for Canada (Alberta – VE6) Summits on the Air Canada (Alberta – VE6/VA6) Association Reference Manual (ARM) Document Reference S87.1 Issue number 2.2 Date of issue 1st August 2016 Participation start date 1st October 2012 Authorised Association Manager Walker McBryde VA6MCB Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged Page 1 of 63 Document S87.1 v2.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for Canada (Alberta – VE6) 1 Change Control ............................................................................................................................. 4 2 Association Reference Data ..................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Programme derivation ..................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 General information .......................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Rights of way and access issues ..................................................................................................... 9 2.4 Maps and navigation .......................................................................................................................... 9 2.5 Safety considerations ..................................................................................................................
  • 2017 Chicxulub Revealed

    2017 Chicxulub Revealed

    THE UNIVERSITY TEXAS OF AUSTIN AT JACKSON• SCHOOL GEOSCIENCES OF 2017 NEWSLETTER• Newsletter2 017 Chicxulub Revealed A first look at rocks from the crater left by the asteroid that wiped out non-avian dinosaurs WELCOME Dear Alumni and Friends he devastation that Hurricane Harvey brought to Texas communities in August was a tragic reminder of how vital it is to understand our planet and T its processes. Shortly after the hurricane struck, our scientists, through our Rapid Response program, began to conduct research to understand how Harvey has impacted the coast and offshore Gulf of Mexico. This research will help determine the best ways to deal with many coastal issues in the aftermath of the storm, and how we might better prepare for such events in the future. You can read more about the mission on page 18. Rapid response efforts on the effects of abrupt, catastrophic geoscience events COVER: GRANITE FROM THE PEAK RING OF provide critical science that can benefit society. This is what we strive to do here at the THE CHICXULUB CRATER FORMED BY THE Jackson School of Geosciences. This year’s Newsletter holds some tremendous examples. ASTEROID STRIKE THAT WIPED OUT ALL NON- AVIAN DINOSAURS I’d like to draw your attention to the story on page 58 about the scientific coring mission led by Peter Flemings to bring back samples of methane hydrate from ABOVE: MEMBERS OF THE JACKSON beneath the Gulf of Mexico. This is a cutting-edge research project on a potential SCHOOL-LED TEAM CORING FOR SAMPLES OF METHANE HYDRATE IN THE GULF OF MEXICO future energy source that very few schools in the world would be able to mount.
  • Project Description Proposed Natural Gas Transmission System

    Project Description Proposed Natural Gas Transmission System

    Project Description Proposed Natural Gas Transmission System Northeast British Columbia to the Prince Rupert Area Suite 2600, 425 - 1st Street SW Suite 1100, 1055 West Georgia Street Fifth Avenue Place, East Tower PO Box 11162 Calgary, AB T2P 3L8 Vancouver, BC V6E 3R5 October 2012 Table of Contents 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 PROPONENT INFORMATION ............................................................................................................. 8 3.0 GENERAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION ............................................................................................ 9 4.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................... 10 4.1 Project Description............................................................................................................. 10 4.2 Alternative Means to Carry Out the Project ........................................................................ 11 4.3 Right-of-Way Characteristics ............................................................................................. 12 4.4 Project Activities ................................................................................................................ 13 4.5 Accidents and Malfunctions ............................................................................................... 18 4.6 Project Development Schedule .........................................................................................