Libya Idp and Returnee Report Round 35 January - February 2021

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Libya Idp and Returnee Report Round 35 January - February 2021 LIBYA IDP AND RETURNEE REPORT ROUND 35 JANUARY - FEBRUARY 2021 Project funded by IOM OIM the European Union THE UN MIGRATION AGENCY © 2021 International Organization for Migration (IOM) Cover photo: IOM Libya staff collecting beneficiary information at a Non-Food Items (NFI) distribution for IDPs All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in during the months of January - February 2021. © / IOM 2021 a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior written permission of the International Organization for Migration (IOM). 2019 Contents Key Findings .......................................................................................................................... 4 Overview ................................................................................................................................ 5 DTM Libya - Return Index Pilot ............................................................................. 6 Displacement and COVID-19 ................................................................................. 11 Displacement and Return Dynamics ................................................................... 14 Locations of Displacement and Return Map ................................................. 16 Demographics ..................................................................................................................... 16 Multi-Sectoral Location Assessment ................................................................... 17 Humanitarian Priority Needs ................................................................................... 17 Humanitarian Priority Needs By Region .......................................................... 18 Health ....................................................................................................................................... 19 Security and Mine Action............................................................................................ 20 Education ................................................................................................................................ 21 Food ........................................................................................................................................... 22 NFI and Access to Markets ........................................................................................ 23 Accommodation ............................................................................................................... 24 Water Sanitation And Hygiene (WASH) ....................................................... 26 Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 28 Reference Map - Libya .................................................................................................. 29 3 DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX | LIBYA KEY FINDINGS Round 35 (January - February 2021) IDPs Returnees 245,483 623,219 idps in libya returnees in libya 92% 95% were displaced due to returned to their the deterioration of the places of origin due security situation 0% 20% to40% improved60% security80% 100% situation 43,725 Tripoli 76% 37,96588% Benghazi of idps live in self-paid of returnees live in rented accommodation 34,545their previous homes Misrata 0% TOP20% 3 REGIONS40% WITH60% IDP80%s 100% 0% TOP 20%3 REGIONS40% WITH60% RETURNEES80% 100% 43,725 TRIPOLITripoli BENGHAZIBenghazi 189,025 37,965 BENGHAZIBenghazi TRIPOLITripoli 150,210 34,545 MISRATAMisrata ALJFARAAljfara 104,130 0%65920% of 66740% 60% 2,19680% 100%Interviews with key informants COMMUNITIES (Round 35, Mobility Tracking) Benghazi 189,025 100% of 100% MUNICIPALITIES Project funded by Tripoli 150,210 coverage the European Union 4 AljfaraDTM LIBYA ROUND 35 104,130 IDP AND RETURNEE REPORT OVERVIEW This report presents the findings of round 35 of the Mobility Tracking component of IOM Libya’s Displacement Tracking IDPs Matrix (DTM) programme, covering January – February 2021. During the reporting period, an increasing number of previously displaced families returned to their places of 245,483 49,051 origin as the security situation continued to be stable while Individuals Families the political process continued towards implementation of the Libyan Political Dialogue Forum roadmap. 82 419 Municipalities Communities The number of returnees identified during this round of data collection increased to 623,219 returnees, compared to 604,965 returnees reported in the previous round. In line with the increases in returnees, the number of IDPs Returnees identified in Libya decreased to 245,483 individuals in Round 35 (see figure 1). 623,219 124,572 Due to the significant increase of spontaneous returns to Individuals Families areas that often lack adequate access to livelihoods and basic services, DTM started implementing a pilot of the Return 49 195 Index in Libya to better understand conditions in locations Municipalities Communities of return; Preliminary findings of several locations with high returnee presence where pilot implementation has been concluded are presented in this report. A full roll-out of the Mobility Tracking. Pages 11 to 13 present the findings on the return index component across all locations of return, awareness levels, public health and social measures in place at including severity modelling between assessed locations, is municipality level, and impact of COVID-19 on other public planned for Round 36. services at municipality level, and impact of COVID-19 on other Furthermore, beginning in 2021, DTM also included additional public services at community level. Oct indicators on COVID-19 pandemic in displacement settings 310,829 under the Multi-Sectoral Location Assessment part of 604,965 Fig 1 Libya displacement and return timeline 567,802 444,760 447,388 457,324 403,978 372,022 304,305 249,298 401,836 343,180 316,415 268,629 278,177 240,188 199,091 179,400 187,423 Dec Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec Feb 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 1. DTM’s Return Index is a tool designed to measure the severity of conditions in locations of return. For further details, see DTM Iraq’s Return Index here. 800000 JANUARY - FEBRUARY 2020 5 700000 600000 500000 400000 300000 200000 100000 0 SepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul Aug SepOctNovDecJanFebMarApr MayJunJulAugOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSebOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepoctNovDecJanFeb DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX | LIBYA DTM LIBYA - RETURN INDEX PILOT A pilot of the DTM return index was implemented in 46 communities (muhalla) in 7 areas of return during the first Summary Findings on Returns quarter of 2021. The areas assessed in this pilot cover the The seven areas of return covered under the pilot of municipalities of Abusliem, Ain Zara, Al Aziziya, Derna, Qasr the return index currently account for 39% of the total Bin Ghasheer, and Suq Aljumaa, and the town of Tawerga. returnee population in Libya (as of round 35). However, key The DTM Libya Return Index pilot is intended to measure informants interviewed in 46% of these communities (21 the severity of conditions in the target locations of return. muhalla) reported that families displaced from these areas This pilot Return Index is based on select indicators reflecting faced challenges ranging from insecurity to an unconducive conditions in the locations of return related to livelihoods, environment which prevents their return to these areas. basic services, social cohesion and safety perceptions. The To identify factors that may help establish a safe environment assessment relies on DTM Mobility Tracking population conducive of return, the following sections look at the figures and on Return Index Key Informant Interviews (KIIs). findings related to The initial findings presented here are based on exploratory i. Livelihoods and basic services analysis of the KII data using only descriptive statistics; statistical modelling to assess the relative impact of each ii. Safety and social cohesion of the indicators in facilitating or preventing returns. The Return Index is planned to guide interventions that promote durable solutions in Libya. Fig 2 Map of target locations assessed in the pilot phase and returnee figures (individual) 37,215 5,500 Derna Tawergha 2,200 Suq Aljumaa 80,515 Abusliem 60,735 Ain Zara 21,335 Qasr Bin Ghasheer 34,120 Al Aziziya 6 DTM LIBYA ROUND 35 IDP AND RETURNEE REPORT Area of Return Livelihoods & Basic Services Are public health Table 1 Summary of selected livelihoodSmall businesses & basic services, Large companiesand safety & social cohesion indicatorsAre basic by services assessed operational areas facilities fully operating? operating? (electricity, water)? MunicipaAlitrye a of ReturRne turnees Livelihooperational?ods & Basic Services Are public health Abusliem 80,515 SmallMost businesses LargeMost companies Most AreMost basic services operational facilities fully Ain Zara 60,735 operating?Some operating?Some No (electricity,Some water)? MAlu Aziziyanicipal ity R34e,t120urn ees Some Most operational?Few Some AbusliemDerna 8037,515215 Most Most MostSome Most AinQasr Zara Bin Ghasheer 6021,735335 Some SomeFew NoFew Some AlSuq Aziziya Aljumaa 342,200,120 SomeMost Most FewMost SomeMost DernaTawergha 375,500,215 MostFew MostNo SomeNo MostSome Qasr Bin Ghasheer 21,335 Some Few Few Some Suq Aljumaa 2,200 Most Most Most Most Tawergha 5,500
Recommended publications
  • Haftar's Calculus for Libya: What Happened, and What Is Next? ICSR Insight by Inga Kristina Trauthig
    Haftar's Calculus for Libya: What Happened, and What is Next? ICSR Insight by Inga Kristina Trauthig In recent days, a battle for Tripoli has At the time of writing, fighting is been raging that bears the forlorn ongoing. On Sunday, 8 April, Tripoli’s possibility of regression for Libya as a only functioning civilian airport at Mitiga whole. A military offensive led by was forced to be evacuated as it was General Khalifa Haftar, commander of hit with air strikes attributed to the LNA. the so-called “Libyan National Army” These airstrikes took place the same (LNA) that mostly controls eastern day that the “Tripoli International Fair” Libya, was launched on April 3, to the occurred, signalling the formidable level dismay of much the international of resilience Libyans have attained after community. A few days after the launch eight years of turbulence following of the military campaign by Haftar, Qaddafi’s overthrow. some analysts have already concluded that “Libya is (…) [in] its third civil war since 2011”. The LNA forces first took the town of Gharyan, 100 km south of Tripoli, before advancing to the city’s outskirts. ICSR, Department of War Studies, King’s College London. All rights reserved. Haftar's Calculus for Libya: What Happened, and What is Next? ICSR Insight by Inga Kristina Trauthig What is happening? Haftar had been building his forces in central Libya for months. At the beginning of the year, he claimed to have “taken control” of southern Libya, indicating that he was prepping for an advance on the western part of Libya, the last piece missing.
    [Show full text]
  • Libya: Protect Vulnerable Minorities & Assist Civilians Harmed
    Libya: Protect Vulnerable Minorities & Assist Civilians Harmed • The Libyan authorities should work with UNSMIL, IOM, the U.S., and other donors to provide protec- tion for displaced sub-Saharan Africans, including through the adoption of migrant-friendly policies and compliance with human rights obligations. • The Libyan authorities should work with UNSMIL, the U.S., and other donors to protect displaced dark-skinned Libyans, foster reconciliation, and provide long-term solutions for them. • The Libyan authorities should request NATO’s, the U.S’s, and UNSMIL’s long-term commitment, and technical and financial assistance to develop an effective security sector capable of protecting civil- ians. • NATO must fully and transparently investigate, and when appropriate make amends for civilian harm incurred as a result of its military operations in Libya. Similarly, the Libyan authorities should ensure all civilian conflict-losses are accounted for and amends offered to help civilians recover. With the death of Muammar Gaddafi a long-standing dictatorship has come to an end. The majority of Libyans are celebrating a new future; but certain groups, including suspected loyalist civilians, sub-Saharan Africans, and ethnic minorities remain displaced and vulnerable to violent attacks. The National Transitional Council (NTC) – the current de facto government of Libya – lacks command and control over all armed groups, including those responsible for revenge attacks. As such, the NTC cannot yet establish or maintain the rule of law. The plight of these vulnerable civilians foreshadows challenges to reconciliation, integration, and equal treatment of all in the new Libya. Further, civilians suffering losses during hostilities have not been properly recognized or assisted.
    [Show full text]
  • Libyan Municipal Council Research 1
    Libyan Municipal Council Research 1. Detailed Methodology 2. Participation 3. Awareness 4. Knowledge 5. Communication 6. Service Delivery 7. Legitimacy 8. Drivers of Legitimacy 9. Focus Group Recommendations 10. Demographics Detailed Methodology • The survey was conducted on behalf of the International Republican Institute’s Center for Insights in Survey Research by Altai Consulting. This research is intended to support the development and evaluation of IRI and USAID/OTI Libya Transition Initiative programming with municipal councils. The research consisted of quantitative and qualitative components, conducted by IRI and USAID/OTI Libya Transition Initiative respectively. • Data was collected April 14 to May 24, 2016, and was conducted over the phone from Altai’s call center using computer-assisted telephone technology. • The sample was 2,671 Libyans aged 18 and over. • Quantitative: Libyans from the 22 administrative districts were interviewed on a 45-question questionnaire on municipal councils. In addition, 13 municipalities were oversampled to provide a more focused analysis on municipalities targeted by programming. Oversampled municipalities include: Tripoli Center (224), Souq al Jumaa (229), Tajoura (232), Abu Salim (232), Misrata (157), Sabratha (153), Benghazi (150), Bayda (101), Sabha (152), Ubari (102), Weddan (101), Gharyan (100) and Shahat (103). • The sample was post-weighted in order to ensure that each district corresponds to the latest population pyramid available on Libya (US Census Bureau Data, updated 2016) in order for the sample to be nationally representative. • Qualitative: 18 focus groups were conducted with 5-10 people of mixed employment status and level of education in Tripoli Center (men and women), Souq al Jumaa (men and women), Tajoura (men), Abu Salim (men), Misrata (men and women), Sabratha (men and women), Benghazi (men and women), Bayda (men), Sabha (men and women), Ubari (men), and Shahat (men).
    [Show full text]
  • Nationwide School Assessment Libya Ministry
    Ministry of Education º«∏©àdGh á«HÎdG IQGRh Ministry of Education Nationwide School Assessment Libya Nationwide School Assessment Report - 2012 Assessment Report School Nationwide Libya LIBYA Libya Nationwide School Assessment Report 2012 Libya Nationwide School Assessment Report 2012 º«∏©àdGh á«HÎdG IQGRh Ministry of Education Nationwide School Assessment Libya © UNICEF Libya/2012-161Y4640/Giovanni Diffidenti LIBYA: Doaa Al-Hairish, a 12 year-old student in Sabha (bottom left corner), and her fellow students during a class in their school in Sabha. Doaa is one of the more shy girls in her class, and here all the others are raising their hands to answer the teacher’s question while she sits quiet and observes. The publication of this volume is made possible through a generous contribution from: the Russian Federation, Kingdom of Sweden, the European Union, Commonwealth of Australia, and the Republic of Poland. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the donors. © Libya Ministry of Education Parts of this publication can be reproduced or quoted without permission provided proper attribution and due credit is given to the Libya Ministry of Education. Design and Print: Beyond Art 4 Printing Printed in Jordan Table of Contents Preface 5 Map of schools investigated by the Nationwide School Assessment 6 Acronyms 7 Definitions 7 1. Executive Summary 8 1.1. Context 9 1.2. Nationwide School Assessment 9 1.3. Key findings 9 1.3.1. Overall findings 9 1.3.2. Basic school information 10 1.3.3.
    [Show full text]
  • IMC Libya Mental Health and Psychosocial Support Assessment Report
    IMC Libya Mental Health and Psychosocial Support Assessment Report November 2011 Prepared by: Dr. Inka Weissbecker, IMC Global Mental Health and Psychosocial Advisor ([email protected]) and Colleen Fitzgerald, MSW, IMC Libya MHPSS Program Manager ([email protected]) 1 | P a g e Contents 1. Assessment Goals II. Psychiatric Services in General Hospitals 2. Assessment Methodology III. Mental Health Services through General Health 2.1. Site Visits, Interviews and Focus Group Clinics Discussions IV. Informal Service Providers 2.2. Assessment Instruments Local Non-Governmental Organizations 3. Assessment Results The School System 3.1. Sociopolitical Context and Recent Developments Traditional Healers 3.1.1. Recent Crisis in Libya V. Self-Care 3.1.2. International Medical Corps in Libya 3.4. The Educational System and Training 3.2. Mental Health and Psychosocial Context Opportunities 3.2.1. Prevalence of Mental Illness 3.4.1. Medical Professions 3.2.2. At Risk and Vulnerable Groups 3.4.2. Psychologists and Social Workers 3.2.2. Mental Health Related Problems, Coping and 3.5. International Organizations Involved in MHPSS Community Sources of Support Work 3.2.3. Attitudes Towards People with Mental Illness 4. Conclusions 3.2.4. Help-Seeking Patterns 5. References 3.3. The Mental Health System 6. Appendixes 3.3.1. General Health Care Appendix 1: MH PHC Integration Checklist 3.3.2. Mental Health Care in Affected Areas Appendix 2: Tool for Mental Health Related Problems, I. Inpatient Psychiatric Facilities Coping and Community Sources of Support 1. Assessment Goals The aim of this assessment was to: obtain an understanding of the mental health context (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Libya's Conflict
    LIBYA’S BRIEF / 12 CONFLICT Nov 2019 A very short introduction SERIES by Wolfgang Pusztai Freelance security and policy analyst * INTRODUCTION Eight years after the revolution, Libya is in the mid- dle of a civil war. For more than four years, inter- national conflict resolution efforts have centred on the UN-sponsored Libya Political Agreement (LPA) process,1 unfortunately without achieving any break- through. In fact, the situation has even deteriorated Summary since the onset of Marshal Haftar’s attack on Tripoli on 4 April 2019.2 › Libya is a failed state in the middle of a civil war and increasingly poses a threat to the An unstable Libya has wide-ranging impacts: as a safe whole region. haven for terrorists, it endangers its north African neighbours, as well as the wider Sahara region. But ter- › The UN-facilitated stabilisation process was rorists originating from or trained in Libya are also a unsuccessful because it ignored key political threat to Europe, also through the radicalisation of the actors and conflict aspects on the ground. Libyan expatriate community (such as the Manchester › While partially responsible, international Arena bombing in 2017).3 Furthermore, it is one of the interference cannot be entirely blamed for most important transit countries for migrants on their this failure. way to Europe. Through its vast oil wealth, Libya is also of significant economic relevance for its neigh- › Stabilisation efforts should follow a decen- bours and several European countries. tralised process based on the country’s for- mer constitution. This Conflict Series Brief focuses on the driving factors › Wherever there is a basic level of stability, of conflict dynamics in Libya and on the shortcomings fostering local security (including the crea- of the LPA in addressing them.
    [Show full text]
  • Gaddafi Supporters Since 2011
    Country Policy and Information Note Libya: Actual or perceived supporters of former President Gaddafi Version 3.0 April 2019 Preface Purpose This note provides country of origin information (COI) and analysis of COI for use by Home Office decision makers handling particular types of protection and human rights claims (as set out in the basis of claim section). It is not intended to be an exhaustive survey of a particular subject or theme. It is split into two main sections: (1) analysis and assessment of COI and other evidence; and (2) COI. These are explained in more detail below. Assessment This section analyses the evidence relevant to this note – i.e. the COI section; refugee/human rights laws and policies; and applicable caselaw – by describing this and its inter-relationships, and provides an assessment on whether, in general: • A person is reasonably likely to face a real risk of persecution or serious harm • A person is able to obtain protection from the state (or quasi state bodies) • A person is reasonably able to relocate within a country or territory • Claims are likely to justify granting asylum, humanitarian protection or other form of leave, and • If a claim is refused, it is likely or unlikely to be certifiable as ‘clearly unfounded’ under section 94 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002. Decision makers must, however, still consider all claims on an individual basis, taking into account each case’s specific facts. Country of origin information The country information in this note has been carefully selected in accordance with the general principles of COI research as set out in the Common EU [European Union] Guidelines for Processing Country of Origin Information (COI), dated April 2008, and the Austrian Centre for Country of Origin and Asylum Research and Documentation’s (ACCORD), Researching Country Origin Information – Training Manual, 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Libya: the ICC and Saif Al-Islam Gaddafi Questions and Answers
    Libya: The ICC and Saif al-Islam Gaddafi Questions and Answers January 2012 The International Criminal Court (ICC) judges granted arrest warrants on June 27, 2011, for Muammar Gaddafi, his son Saif al-Islam, and former intelligence chief Abdullah Sanussi in an investigation authorized by United Nations Security Council Resolution 1970. The three were wanted on charges of crimes against humanity for their roles in attacks on civilians, including peaceful demonstrators, in Tripoli, Benghazi, Misrata, and other locations in Libya. Consistent with Resolution 1970, the ICC warrants apply only to events in Libya beginning on February 15, 2011. While the ICC's proceeding against Muammar Gaddafi was terminated following his death on October 20, anti-Gaddafi forces apprehended Saif al-Islam Gaddafi on November 19 in southern Libya and are holding him in the town of Zintan. While initial reports suggested that a militia also had captured Sanussi, his whereabouts remain unknown. Libya’s general prosecutor told Human Rights Watch on December 10: “Officially we don’t have him.” Following Saif al-Islam Gaddafi's apprehension in November, some representatives of Libya's transitional government and National Transitional Council (NTC) declared that he would be tried in Libya. The chairman of the NTC, the justice minister, and the general prosecutor subsequently reiterated this stance to Human Rights Watch. In December the ICC judges requested further information from the Libyan authorities regarding Saif al-Islam Gaddafi’s status, including whether and when Libya intends to surrender him to the court. Libya was supposed to provide that information by January 10, 2012, but it requested a three-week extension due to the security situation in Libya.
    [Show full text]
  • For Ubari LBY2007 Libya
    Research Terms of Reference Area-Based Assessment (ABA) for Ubari LBY2007 Libya 22nd of January, 2021 V3 1. Executive Summary Country of intervention Libya Type of Emergency □ Natural disaster X Conflict Type of Crisis □ Sudden onset □ Slow onset X Protracted Mandating Body/ EUTF Agency Project Code 14EHG Overall Research Timeframe (from 01/10/2020 to 14/04/2021 research design to final outputs / M&E) Research Timeframe 1. Start collect data: 26/01/2021 5. Preliminary presentation: 13/03/2021 Add planned deadlines 2. Data collected: 25/02/2021 6. Outputs sent for validation: 31/03/2021 (for first cycle if more 3. Data analysed: 05/03/2021 7. Outputs published: 14/04/2021 than 1) 4. Data sent for validation: 31/03/2021 8. Final presentation: 14/04/2021 Number of X Single assessment (one cycle) assessments □ Multi assessment (more than one cycle) [Describe here the frequency of the cycle] Humanitarian Milestone Deadline milestones □ Donor plan/strategy _ _/_ _/_ _ _ _ Specify what will the □ Inter-cluster plan/strategy _ _/_ _/_ _ _ _ assessment inform and □ Cluster plan/strategy _ _/_ _/_ _ _ _ when e.g. The shelter cluster □ NGO platform plan/strategy _ _/_ _/_ _ _ _ will use this data to X Other (Specify): 31/03/2021 The Area-Based Assessment draft its Revised Flash (ABA) for Ubari will directly inform ACTED Appeal; protection activities in Ubari. (See rationale) Audience Type & Audience type Dissemination Dissemination Specify X Strategic X General Product Mailing (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • The Human Conveyor Belt : Trends in Human Trafficking and Smuggling in Post-Revolution Libya
    The Human Conveyor Belt : trends in human trafficking and smuggling in post-revolution Libya March 2017 A NETWORK TO COUNTER NETWORKS The Human Conveyor Belt : trends in human trafficking and smuggling in post-revolution Libya Mark Micallef March 2017 Cover image: © Robert Young Pelton © 2017 Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the Global Initiative. Please direct inquiries to: The Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime WMO Building, 2nd Floor 7bis, Avenue de la Paix CH-1211 Geneva 1 Switzerland www.GlobalInitiative.net Acknowledgments This report was authored by Mark Micallef for the Global Initiative, edited by Tuesday Reitano and Laura Adal. Graphics and layout were prepared by Sharon Wilson at Emerge Creative. Editorial support was provided by Iris Oustinoff. Both the monitoring and the fieldwork supporting this document would not have been possible without a group of Libyan collaborators who we cannot name for their security, but to whom we would like to offer the most profound thanks. The author is also thankful for comments and feedback from MENA researcher Jalal Harchaoui. The research for this report was carried out in collaboration with Migrant Report and made possible with funding provided by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Norway, and benefitted from synergies with projects undertaken by the Global Initiative in partnership with the Institute for Security Studies and the Hanns Seidel Foundation, the United Nations University, and the UK Department for International Development. About the Author Mark Micallef is an investigative journalist and researcher specialised on human smuggling and trafficking.
    [Show full text]
  • Misrata 1. Introduction Misrata Is the Third Largest City in Libya, With
    CHAPTER NINE MISRATA 1. Introduction Misrata is the third largest city in Libya, with a population of approxi- mately 517,000 inhabitants before the conflict.1 It is a port city located on the far western edge of the Gulf of Sidra along the Mediterranean Coast, 187 kilometers (116 miles) east of Tripoli and 825 kilometers (512 miles) west of Benghazi.2 The city center lies just off the coast, with the seaport to the east and the airport to the south. The center is connected by a num- ber of major roads, including Tripoli Street, the main commercial boule- vard in downtown Misrata that connects to the Libyan Coastal Highway. A number of suburbs, including Al-Ghayran and Al-Shawati, extend out from the city center.3 Misrata is traditionally regarded as the country’s business capital, serv- ing as a central locale for the exchange of commodities and materials with other cities. The city’s steel mill industry is one of its principal sources of income and employment, and the industry has been able to expand throughout the years with its owners holding considerable influence in the city. Misrata is one of the country’s most modern cities, with infra- structure that includes new roads, electricity and communication centers, 1 United Nations Inter-Agency Mission, Misrata: 10 to 14 July 2011, UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs 4 (2011), available at http://reliefweb .int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/Full_report_157.pdf. Other estimates put Misrata’s population closer to 380,000 people before the conflict. See Misratah, WolframAlpha, available at http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Misratah&lk=1&a=ClashPrefs_*City .*Misratah.Misratah.Libya--.
    [Show full text]
  • DEATH of a DICTATOR Bloody Vengeance in Sirte WATCH
    HUMAN RIGHTS DEATH OF A DICTATOR Bloody Vengeance in Sirte WATCH Death of a Dictator Bloody Vengeance in Sirte Copyright © 2012 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-952-6 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch is dedicated to protecting the human rights of people around the world. We stand with victims and activists to prevent discrimination, to uphold political freedom, to protect people from inhumane conduct in wartime, and to bring offenders to justice. We investigate and expose human rights violations and hold abusers accountable. We challenge governments and those who hold power to end abusive practices and respect international human rights law. We enlist the public and the international community to support the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org OCTOBER 2012 ISBN: 1-56432-952-6 Death of a Dictator Bloody Vengeance in Sirte Summary ........................................................................................................................... 1 Recommendations .............................................................................................................14 I. Background ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]