DOCSLIB.ORG

Central-West Anatolia at the End of 7Th and Beginning of 6Th Millennium Bce in the Light of Pottery from Ulucak (Izmir)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Central-West Anatolia at the End of 7Th and Beginning of 6Th Millennium Bce in the Light of Pottery from Ulucak (Izmir) CENTRAL-WEST ANATOLIA AT THE END OF 7TH AND BEGINNING OF 6TH MILLENNIUM BCE IN THE LIGHT OF POTTERY FROM ULUCAK (İZMIR) Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktor der Philosophie der Fakultät für Kulturwissenschaften der Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen vorgelegt von Çiler Çilingiroğlu aus Balıkesir (Türkei) 2009 Gedruckt mit Genehmigung der Fakultät für Kulturwissenschaften der Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen Gutacher: Prof. Dr. Ernst Pernicka PD Dr. Barbara Helwing Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 23.06.2009 Dekan: Prof. Dr. Jürgen Leonhardt Contents VOLUME I Contents i Foreword vii List of the plans xi List of the photo plates xi List of abbreviations xiii I. General Research Outline A. Theoretical framework and goals of research 1 B. Geographical framework 11 C. Temporal framework 14 II. History of Neolithic Research in Turkey and West Anatolia A. History of Neolithic research in Turkey 17 B. Neolithic studies in West Anatolia 21 C. What distinguishes Late Neolithic from Early Chalcolithic in Anatolia? 24 D. Is Ulucak IV a Neolithic or a Chalcolithic site? 29 III. Introducing Ulucak Höyük A. Geographical and ecological data 31 B. Status of research 37 C. Excavation techniques 39 D. Stratigraphy of the mound 40 E. Radiocarbon dates from Ulucak 44 F. General features of architecture at Ulucak 48 1. Level IV 48 2. Level V 50 G. Settlement organization at Ulucak 51 1. Level IV 52 1.1. Orientation and size of the buildings 52 1.2. Space between the structures 53 1.3. Evidence of communal activity areas 54 1.4. Communal storage facilities 56 1.5. Presence of buildings or areas for ritual activities 56 2. Level V 61 2.1. Orientation and size of the buildings 61 2.2. Space between the structures 62 2.3. Evidence of communal activity areas 63 2.4. Communal storage facilities 64 2.5. Presence of buildings or areas for ritual activities 64 H.The Neolithic assemblage 65 I. Subsistence 71 IV. Analysis of Ulucak IV and V Pottery A. Pottery analysis methods 77 1. Main bibliographic sources used in the study 77 2. Initial processing of the assemblage 78 3. Description of the fields in the databank 79 3.1. General information 79 3.2. Contextual information 80 3.3. Physical properties 80 3.4. Definition of the wares 86 3.5. Morphological information 90 3.6. Definitions of the vessel shapes 92 4. Illustration 94 B. Layer IVa 95 1. Description of the phase 95 2. Fabric 95 3. Morphology 98 C. Layer IVb 101 1. Description of the phase 101 2. Fabric 102 3. Morphology 105 4. Distribution of pottery in Level IVb buildings 108 D. Layer IVc 125 1. Description of the phase 125 2. Fabric 127 3. Morphology 129 E. Layer IVd 132 1. Description of the phase 132 2. Fabric 133 3. Morphology 134 F. Layer IVe 137 1. Description of the phase 137 2. Fabric 138 3. Morphology 139 G. Layer IVf 143 1. Description of the phase 143 2. Fabric 143 3. Morphology 145 H. Layer IVg 148 1. Description of the phase 148 ii 2. Fabric 149 3. Morphology 150 I. Layer IVh 154 1. Description of the phase 154 2. Fabric 155 3. Morphology 157 J. Layer IVi 161 1. Description of the phase 161 2. Fabric 162 3. Morphology 163 K. Layer IVk 167 1. Description of the phase 167 2. Fabric 168 3. Morphology 171 L. Layer Va 174 1. Description of the phase 174 2. Fabric 176 3. Morphology 178 M. Layer Vb 182 1. Description of the phase 182 2. Fabric 183 3. Morphology 184 N. Comparisons of pottery from levels V and IV 190 1. Fabric 191 2. Morphology 196 V. Pottery Technology, Function, and Organization of Ceramic Production at Ulucak 203 A. Procurement of raw materials 204 B. Preparation of raw materials 208 C. Forming the vessels 210 D. Pre-firing treatments 212 E. Firing 216 F. Post-firing treatments 221 G. Degree of specialization 221 H. Function of ceramic vessels 227 VOLUME II VI. Intraregional and Interregional Comparisons of Ulucak IV-V Pottery A. Central-West Anatolia 235 1. Yeşilova 236 2. Ege Gübre 238 iii 3. Çukuriçi Höyük 241 4. Dedecik-Heybelitepe 242 5. Agio Gala Lower and Upper Caves 243 6. General overview of the sites surveyed 245 7. Comparisons with Ulucak ceramics 246 B. Southwestern Anatolia (Muğla and Aydın Regions) 254 1. Aphrodisias-Pekmez 254 2. Latmos (Beşparmak) Mountain 255 3. General overview of the sites surveyed 255 C. Troas and Gökçeada 257 1. Coşkuntepe 258 2. Uğurlu 258 3. Comparisons with Ulucak ceramics 259 D. Lake District 261 1. Hacılar 263 1.1. General overview of the archaeological research 263 1.2. Ceramics 267 1.3. Comparing Hacılar with Ulucak 270 2. Kuruçay 279 2.1. General overview of the archaeological research 279 2.2. Ceramics 281 2.3. Relative dating of Kuruçay 284 3. Bademağacı 288 3.1. General overview of the archaeological research 288 3.2. Ceramics 290 3.3. Relative dating of Bademağacı 291 4. Höyücek 295 4.1. General overview of the archaeological research 295 4.2. Ceramics 297 4.3. Relative dating of Höyücek 299 5. Comparing Lake District sites to Central-West Anatolia 300 5.1 Fabric and wares 302 5.2 Morphology 307 E. Elmalı Plain 309 F. Beyşehir-Suğla Basin and Konya Plain 310 1. Suberde 311 2. Erbaba 312 3. Çatalhöyük East 313 4. Çatalhöyük West 318 5. Can Hasan 319 6. Pottery sequence of the region and comparisons with Central-West Anatolia 323 iv G. Melendiz and Bor Plains (Aksaray and Niğde Regions) 329 1. Musular 330 2. Tepecik-Çiftlik 333 3. Köşk Höyük 335 3.1. General overview of the archaeological research 335 3.2. Ceramics 337 3.3. Relative Dating of Köşk Höyük 338 4. Pottery sequence of the region and comparisons with Central-West Anatolia 340 H. Porsuk-Sakarya Basin (Eskişehir and Kütahya) 346 1. Demircihöyük 346 2. General overview of the sites surveyed 350 3. Comparisons with Central-West Anatolia 351 I. Eastern Marmara Region (İznik Basin and Istanbul) 354 1. Fikirtepe 356 2. Pendik 357 3. Yarımburgaz Cave 358 4. Ceramics of Yarımburgaz Layers 5 and 4 359 5. Fikirtepe and Pendik Ceramics 360 6. Ilıpınar 362 6.1 . Ceramics 364 6.2 . Comparing Ilıpınar with Ulucak 366 7. Menteşe Höyük 372 8. Barcın Höyük 375 9. Aktopraklık 377 10. Ceramic sequence of the region and comparisons with Central-West Anatolia 378 J. Thrace 386 1. Hoca Çeşme 389 1.1. Ceramics 392 1.2. Comparisons with Central-West Anatolia 394 2. Aşağı Pınar 399 2.1. Ceramics 401 2.2. Comparisons with Ulucak 402 3. Karanovo 403 3.1. Ceramics 404 3.2. Comparisons with Ulucak 406 4. Rakitovo 410 5. Ceramic Sequence of the Region and Comparisons with Central-West Anatolia 413 K. Northeast Bulgaria 415 1. Polyanitsa-Platoto 416 2. Koprivets 417 v 3. Comparisons with Ulucak and Anatolian sites 418 L. Struma River Valley and Sofia Basin 422 1. Kovačevo 423 1.1. Ceramics 425 1.2. Comparisons with Ulucak 426 2. Krainitsi I 428 2.1. Ceramics 429 2.2. Comparisons with Ulucak 430 3. Slatina-Sofia 432 4. Ceramic Sequence in the Region 435 M. Macedonia 437 1. Nea Nikomedeia 438 2. Yannitsa B 442 3. Anzabegova 443 4. Comparisons with Central-West Anatolia 445 N. Thessaly (Larissa and Karditsa Plains) 449 1. Sesklo 455 2. Argissa 459 3. Achilleion 462 4. Comparing Thessalian Ceramic Sequence with Central-West Anatolia 468 O. Final Remarks 478 Concluding Remarks and Future Prospects 484 Bibliography 493 List of the Ulucak Radiocarbon Dates 536 List of the Calibrated Ulucak Radiocarbon Dates 537 VOLUME III Map Chronological Table Photo Plates Plans Summary of Ceramic Morphology Catalogue of the Illustrated Ceramics Plates Tables concerning fabrics Tables concerning morphology vi Foreword The subject matter of this study is the analytical results of research conducted on the pottery from Ulucak IV-V, a prehistoric mound in the vicinity of İzmir in Central-West Turkey discovered by David French. The occupational levels IV and V at Ulucak, systematically excavated since 1995, correspond to 7-6th millennia cal. BCE, or more concretely, to the era of the early food-producing communities in the region. Until recently, there was virtually no problem-oriented research, neither surveys nor excavations, in the area which aimed to focus on the evidence of the early farming societies. Thus, long-term excavations at Ulucak functioned as a pioneering project aiming to expose large areas belonging to the Neolithic period. The lengthy depositional sequence of the mound enabled archaeologists to reveal the intra-site culture-historical sequence, as well as define local characteristics of the Neolithic material culture. Thanks to the research at Ulucak it has become possible to discuss the origins, relationships, and development of Neolithic culture in Western Anatolia. Subsequent excavations at other contemporary sites in the area surrounding Ulucak, namely at Ege Gübre, Yeşilova, Çukuriçi and Dedecik-Heybelitepe, turned Central-West Anatolia, specifically the İzmir Region, to one of the best researched regions in Turkey with respect to the Neolithic period. Besides, the material culture unearthed at these sites enabled the prehistorians to acknowledge the intra-regional homogeneity as well as diversity and led them to consider possibilities regarding the multiple origins and diverse social-cultural connections of early the food-producing groups in Central-West Anatolia. Most of the previous assumptions related to the cultural origins and relations of İzmir Region have been abandoned or re-formulated. Specifically the assumption that the earliest farmers arrived in the region as late as 6400 cal.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 7 Great Pottery Projects
    ceramic artsdaily.org 7 great pottery projects | Second Edition | tips on making complex pottery forms using basic throwing and handbuilding skills This special report is brought to you with the support of Atlantic Pottery Supply Inc. 7 Great Pottery Projects Tips on Making Complex Pottery Forms Using Basic Throwing and Handbuilding Skills There’s nothing more fun than putting your hands in clay, but when you get into the studio do you know what you want to make? With clay, there are so many projects to do, it’s hard to focus on which ones to do first. So, for those who may wany some step-by-step direction, here are 7 great pottery projects you can take on. The projects selected here are easy even though some may look complicated. But with our easy-to-follow format, you’ll be able to duplicate what some of these talented potters have described. These projects can be made with almost any type of ceramic clay and fired at the recommended temperature for that clay. You can also decorate the surfaces of these projects in any style you choose—just be sure to use food-safe glazes for any pots that will be used for food. Need some variation? Just combine different ideas with those of your own and create all- new projects. With the pottery techniques in this book, there are enough possibilities to last a lifetime! The Stilted Bucket Covered Jar Set by Jake Allee by Steve Davis-Rosenbaum As a college ceramics instructor, Jake enjoys a good The next time you make jars, why not make two and time just like anybody else and it shows with this bucket connect them.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses Neolithic and chalcolithic cultures in Turkish Thrace Erdogu, Burcin How to cite: Erdogu, Burcin (2001) Neolithic and chalcolithic cultures in Turkish Thrace, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/3994/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk NEOLITHIC AND CHALCOLITHIC CULTURES IN TURKISH THRACE Burcin Erdogu Thesis Submitted for Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. University of Durham Department of Archaeology 2001 Burcin Erdogu PhD Thesis NeoHthic and ChalcoHthic Cultures in Turkish Thrace ABSTRACT The subject of this thesis are the NeoHthic and ChalcoHthic cultures in Turkish Thrace. Turkish Thrace acts as a land bridge between the Balkans and Anatolia.
    [Show full text]
  • Pottery Pieces Designed & Handmade in Our Ceramic Studios and Fired in Our Kilns
    GLAZES ACCESSORIES FOUNTAINS PLANTERS & URNS OIL JARS ORNAMENTAL PIECES BIRDBATHS INTRODUCTION TERY est. 1875 Gladding, McBean & Co. POT Over A Century Of Camanship In Clay INTRODUCTION artisan made This catalog shows the wide range of pottery pieces designed & handmade in our ceramic studios and fired in our kilns. These pieces are not only for the garden, but also for general use of decoration indoors and out. Gladding, McBean & Co. has been producing this pottery for 130 years. Its manufacture began in the earliest years of the company’s existence at a time when no other terra cotta plant on the Pacific Coast was attempting anything of the sort. Gladding, McBean & Co. therefore, has pioneered in pottery-making. The company feels that it has carried the art to an impressive height of excellence. In every detail but color the following photographs speak for themselves. Each piece is glazed in one of our beautiful proprietary glazes. A complete set of glaze samples can be seen at our retail showrooms. This pottery is on display at, and may be ordered from, any of the retail showrooms listed on our website at www.gladdingmcbean.com. In photographing the pieces, and in reproducing the photographs for this catalog, the strictist care was taken to make the pictures as faithful as possible to the objects themselves. We are confident that in every instance the pottery will be found lovelier than its picture. The poet might well have had this pottery in mind when he wrote: “A thing of beauty is a joy forever.” BIRDBATHS no. 1099 birdbath width: 15.5” height: 24.5” base: 10” Birdbath no.
    [Show full text]
  • Seyitömer Höyük Orta Tunç Çağı'na Ait Çizi Bezemeli Ağırşaklar
    Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 2020 8(6) 2003–2013 Journal of Social Sciences of Mus Alparslan University anemon Derginin ana sayfası: http://dergipark.gov.tr/anemon Araştırma Makalesi ● Research Article Seyitömer Höyük Orta Tunç Çağı’na Ait Çizi Bezemeli Ağırşaklar* Seyitömer Mound Medium Bronze Age Line Decoration Spindle Whorls Hülya Karaoğlan a,** a Öğr. Gör. Kütahya Dumlupınar Üniversitesi, Gediz Meslek Yüksek Okulu, Tasarım Bölümü, 43600, Kütahya/Türkiye. ORCİD: 0000-0003-1363-1779 MAKALE BİLGİSİ ÖZ Makale Geçmişi: Kütahya İlinin 30 km kuzeybatısında yer alan Seyitömer Höyük’te Kütahya Dumlupınar Başvuru tarihi: 01 Eylül 2019 Üniversitesi Arkeoloji bölümü tarafından aralıksız dokuz yıl süren kazı çalışmaları yapılmıştır. Düzeltme tarihi: 05 Haziran 2020 Seyitömer Höyük’te ele geçen buluntular arasında iplik üretiminde kullanılan ağırşaklar oldukça fazladır. Bu çalışmada Seyitömer Höyük ağırşak buluntularından M.Ö. 2. Bin’e ait olan çizi bezeme Kabul tarihi: 19 Haziran 2020 ile süslenmiş (işaretlenmiş) ağırşak grubu incelenmiştir. Bu grup kapsamındaki buluntular Orta Tunç Batı Anadolusun’daki yerleşimlerden Yanarlar, Anahtar Kelimeler: Çavlum, Beycesultan, Milet, Iasos, Şarhöyük, Kusura, Çeşme-Bağlararası, Liman Tepe, Kütahya Aphrodisias, Troya V. ve Demircihöyük yerleşimlerinin ağırşak buluntularıyla bezeme benzerlik Seyitömer Höyük yönleri araştırılmış ve kaynakçalarıyla verilmiştir. Çalışmada Seyitömer Höyük çizi bezemeli Ağırşak ağırşakların çizimleri, buluntu yerleri, ölçüleri ve tanımları katalog şeklinde verilmiştir. M.Ö. 2OOO, Çalışmanın amacı; arkeolojik araştırmalar için önemli olan bu buluntu grubunu literatüre katmaktır. Çizi Bezeme. A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history: Located in Seyitömer Mound, 30 km northwest of Kütahya Province, were carried out by the Received : 05 September 2019 Archeology Department of Kütahya Dumlupınar University.
    [Show full text]
  • The Emergence of the Light, Horse-Drawn Chariot in the Near-East C. 2000-1500 B.C. Author(S): P. R. S. Moorey Source: World Archaeology, Vol
    The Emergence of the Light, Horse-Drawn Chariot in the Near-East c. 2000-1500 B.C. Author(s): P. R. S. Moorey Source: World Archaeology, Vol. 18, No. 2, Weaponry and Warfare (Oct., 1986), pp. 196-215 Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/124615 Accessed: 06-11-2015 06:35 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Taylor & Francis, Ltd. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to World Archaeology. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 141.211.4.224 on Fri, 06 Nov 2015 06:35:53 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Tlhe emergence of the light, horse-drawn chariot in the Near-East c. 2000-1500 B.C.* The recent appearance of three richly documented monographs assembling the diverse and often complex evidence for riding and traction in the pre-classical societies of the Near East and Europe (Littauer and Crouwel 1979: Crouwel 1981: Piggott 1983) provides an opportunity for reassessing a number of critical issues in the earliest history of the light, horse-drawn chariot, whose arrival in many ancient communities has long been seen as a source of significant change in politics and society.
    [Show full text]
  • İzmi̇r History
    İZMİR HISTORY Project Design Strategy Report First Edition, İzmir, 2016 1 Prof. Dr. İlhan Tekeli Prepared for publication by: Dr. H. Gökhan Kutlu Merve Çalışkan, Gizem Akyıldız, Dr. Çağlayan Deniz Kaplan, Alkın Korkmaz First Edition: September, 2016 İzmir Metropolitan Municipality Department of Survey and Project Directorate of Historic Environment and Cultural Properties İzmir History Project Centre 500 Copies Printed By: Dinç Ofset ISBN: 978-975-18-0201-9 2 CONTENTS I.INTRODUCTION 4 II.THESPATIALDIFFERENTIATIONOFTHEPOPULATIONANDTHEECONOMICGROWTH INIZMIR 7 WHATKINDOFASPATIALDIFFERENTIATIONTHEECONOMICGROWTHOFIZMIRSHOWS? 8 THEFORMATIONOFTHEIZMIRCENTERBUSINESSDISTRICT(CBD)ANDTHEFORMATIONDYNAMICSOFTHEIZMIRͲ HISTORYAREAINTHECHANGINGPROCESSINTHECOURSEOFTIME 15 IIIDETERMINATIONOFTHEIZMIRHISTORYPROJECTAREAANDSUBAREAS 34 THEFORMATIONOFTHEIZMIRͲHISTORYPROJECTANDTHELANDUSAGESTATUSESONIT 37 CHANGESTHATWEREEXPERIENCEDDURINGTHEREPUBLICPERIODINTHEIZMIRͲHISTORYPROJECTAREA ECONOMICALACTIVITIESPROFILE 47 DETERMINATIONOFTHESUBAREASOFTHEIZMIRͲHISTORYPROJECT 53 PROCESSOFTHERIFTFORMATIONINTHEIZMIRͲHISTORYPROJECTAREA 66 INFORMATIONABOUTROMANIZMIRINTHEIZMIRͲHISTORYPROJECTAREA 68 IV.STRATEGYPROPOSALOFTHEPRESERVATION/DEVELOPMENTOFIZMIRͲHISTORY PROJECTAREA 70 AIMS 71 STRATEGICALORIENTATION 72 STRATEGIESTHATSHALLBEBENEFITEDINDEVELOPINGTHEIZMIRͲHISTORYPROJECTASPERTHESUBJECTS 74 1.URBANARCHAELOGYANDPRESERVATIONSTRATEGYTHATSHALLBEIMPLEMENTEDINTHEPROJECTREGION 75 2.STRATEGYOFBRINGINGSOMEPLACESINTHEPROJECTAREAINBEINGAPLACEWHICHREALIZESAN“EXPERIENCE” BEYONDBEINGALIFEAREA.
    [Show full text]
  • Separating Fact from Fiction in the Aiolian Migration
    hesperia yy (2008) SEPARATING FACT Pages399-430 FROM FICTION IN THE AIOLIAN MIGRATION ABSTRACT Iron Age settlementsin the northeastAegean are usuallyattributed to Aioliancolonists who journeyed across the Aegean from mainland Greece. This articlereviews the literary accounts of the migration and presentsthe relevantarchaeological evidence, with a focuson newmaterial from Troy. No onearea played a dominantrole in colonizing Aiolis, nor is sucha widespread colonizationsupported by the archaeologicalrecord. But the aggressive promotionof migrationaccounts after the PersianWars provedmutually beneficialto bothsides of theAegean and justified the composition of the Delian League. Scholarlyassessments of habitation in thenortheast Aegean during the EarlyIron Age are remarkably consistent: most settlements are attributed toAiolian colonists who had journeyed across the Aegean from Thessaly, Boiotia,Akhaia, or a combinationof all three.1There is no uniformityin theancient sources that deal with the migration, although Orestes and his descendantsare named as theleaders in mostaccounts, and are credited withfounding colonies over a broadgeographic area, including Lesbos, Tenedos,the western and southerncoasts of theTroad, and theregion betweenthe bays of Adramyttion and Smyrna(Fig. 1). In otherwords, mainlandGreece has repeatedly been viewed as theagent responsible for 1. TroyIV, pp. 147-148,248-249; appendixgradually developed into a Mountjoy,Holt Parker,Gabe Pizzorno, Berard1959; Cook 1962,pp. 25-29; magisterialstudy that is includedhere Allison Sterrett,John Wallrodt, Mal- 1973,pp. 360-363;Vanschoonwinkel as a companionarticle (Parker 2008). colm Wiener, and the anonymous 1991,pp. 405-421; Tenger 1999, It is our hope that readersinterested in reviewersfor Hesperia. Most of trie pp. 121-126;Boardman 1999, pp. 23- the Aiolian migrationwill read both articlewas writtenin the Burnham 33; Fisher2000, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review on Urbanization, Pollution and Biodiversity in İzmir
    International Journal of Environmental Trends (IJENT) 2019: 3 (1),31-38 ISSN: 2602-4160 Review Article A review on Urbanization, Pollution and Biodiversity in İzmir 1 2 Ece SÖKMEN YILMAZ* , Semih YILMAZ 1 Molkim Industrial Products, Department of Research & Development, İzmir, Turkey 2 Dokuz Eylül University, Maritime Faculty, Department of Marine Engineering, İzmir, Turkey Received 05 November 2018 Abstract Accepted 14 April 2019 Izmir is a town with rich habitats in biodiversity as urbanization is rapidly increasing. In this study, the studies on ecology of Izmir have been compiled and Keywords İzmir important natural areas are mentioned. Urbanization and pollution have also been Ecology noted. Biodiversity Urbanization The purpose of this study is; the bringing together of scientific data on Pollution urbanization, pollution and ecology of Izmir and the constituting a basis for evaluating the factors that threaten the ecological situation and environmental health which are not taken into consideration in the projects planned or the projects to be carried out. International Journal of Environmental Trends, 3 (1), 31-38. DOI: not now possible _________________________ 1 Corresponding Author Email: [email protected] 31 International Journal of Environmental Trends (IJENT) 2019: 3(1), 31-38 INTRODUCTION Although urbanization is an increase in the number of cities and population, it is a process that changes the attitudes and behaviors and social structure of people emerging with some technological, economic, social and political phenomena. As cities include different ethnic groups, cultures, social strata and occupational groups, the relations at individual and group levels differ in cities. The resulting individualization is the source of intergenerational conflict arising from value differences.
    [Show full text]
  • Ch. 4. NEOLITHIC PERIOD in JORDAN 25 4.1
    Borsa di studio finanziata da: Ministero degli Affari Esteri di Italia Thanks all …………. I will be glad to give my theses with all my love to my father and mother, all my brothers for their helps since I came to Italy until I got this degree. I am glad because I am one of Dr. Ursula Thun Hohenstein students. I would like to thanks her to her help and support during my research. I would like to thanks Dr.. Maysoon AlNahar and the Museum of the University of Jordan stuff for their help during my work in Jordan. I would like to thank all of Prof. Perreto Carlo and Prof. Benedetto Sala, Dr. Arzarello Marta and all my professors in the University of Ferrara for their support and help during my Phd Research. During my study in Italy I met a lot of friends and specially my colleges in the University of Ferrara. I would like to thanks all for their help and support during these years. Finally I would like to thanks the Minister of Fournier of Italy, Embassy of Italy in Jordan and the University of Ferrara institute for higher studies (IUSS) to fund my PhD research. CONTENTS Ch. 1. INTRODUCTION 1 Ch. 2. AIMS OF THE RESEARCH 3 Ch. 3. NEOLITHIC PERIOD IN NEAR EAST 5 3.1. Pre-Pottery Neolithic A (PPNA) in Near east 5 3.2. Pre-pottery Neolithic B (PPNB) in Near east 10 3.2.A. Early PPNB 10 3.2.B. Middle PPNB 13 3.2.C. Late PPNB 15 3.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Handouts JM
    UCL - INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ARCL3034 THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF EARLY ANATOLIA 2007/2008 Year 3 Option for BA Archaeology 0.5 unit Co-ordinator: Professor Roger Matthews [email protected] Room 411. Tel: 020 7679 7481 UCL students at the Iron Age site of Kerkenes, June 2006 1 AIMS To provide an introduction to the archaeology of early Anatolia, from the Palaeolithic to the Iron Age. To consider major issues in the development of human society in Anatolia, including the origins and evolution of sedentism, agriculture, early complex societies, empires and states. To consider the nature and interpretation of archaeological sources in approaching the past of Anatolia. To familiarize students with the conduct and excitement of the practice of archaeology in Anatolia, through an intensive 2-week period of organized site and museum visits in Turkey. OBJECTIVES On successful completion of this course a student should: Have a broad overview of the archaeology of early Anatolia. Appreciate the significance of the archaeology of early Anatolia within the broad context of the development of human society. Appreciate the importance of critical approaches to archaeological sources within the context of Anatolia and Western Asia. Understand first-hand the thrill and challenge of practicing archaeology in the context of Turkey. COURSE INFORMATION This handbook contains the basic information about the content and administration of the course. Additional subject-specific reading lists and individual session handouts will be given out at appropriate points in the course. If students have queries about the objectives, structure, content, assessment or organisation of the course, they should consult the Course Co-ordinator.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID Proceedings of the 5Th
    Burying the Dead in Late Neolithic Syria Akkermans, P.M.M.G.; Cordoba, J.M.; Molist, M.; Perez, C.; Rubio, I.; Martinez, S. Citation Akkermans, P. M. M. G. (2006). Burying the Dead in Late Neolithic Syria. Proceedings Of The 5Th International Congress On The Archaeology Of The Ancient Near East, 621-645. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/15850 Version: Not Applicable (or Unknown) License: Leiden University Non-exclusive license Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/15850 Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable). UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID Proceedings of the 5th International Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Proceedings of the 5th International Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East Madrid, April 3-8 2006 Edited by Joaquín Mª Córdoba, Miquel Molist, Mª Carmen Pérez, Isabel Rubio, Sergio Martínez (Editores) Madrid, 3 a 8 de abril de 2006 Actas del V Congreso Internacional de Arqueología del Oriente Próximo Antiguo VOL. III Centro Superior de Estudios sobre el Oriente Próximo y Egipto Madrid 2008 Colección Actas © ISBN (OBRA COMPLETA): 978-84-8344-140-4 ISBN (VOL. III): 978-84-8344-147-3 Depósito legal: GU-129/2009 Realiza: Palop Producciones Gráficas. Impreso en España. Diseño de cubierta: M.A. Tejedor. 5th International Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East V Congreso Internacional de Arqueología del Oriente Próximo Antiguo Scientific Committee Scientific Steering Committee Comité Científico Organizador Comité Científico Permanente Joaquín Mª Córdoba Manfred Bietak Sergio Martínez Barthel Hrouda (honorary member) Miquel Molist Hartmut Kühne Mª Carmen Pérez Jean-Claude Margueron Isabel Rubio Wendy Matthews Paolo Matthiae Diederik Meijer Ingolf Thuesen Irene J.
    [Show full text]
  • Halaf Settlement in the Iraqi Kurdistan: the Shahrizor Survey Project
    The Archaeology of the Kurdistan Region of Iraq and Adjacent Regions Access Open Edited by Konstantinos Kopanias and John MacGinnis Archaeopress Archaeopress Archaeology Copyright Archaeopress and the authors 2016 Archaeopress Publishing Ltd Gordon House 276 Banbury Road Oxford OX2 7ED www.archaeopress.com ISBN 978 1 78491 393 9 ISBN 978 1 78491 394 6 (e-Pdf) © Archaeopress and the authors 2016 Access Cover illustration: Erbil Citadel, photo Jack Pascal Open All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owners. Archaeopress Printed in England by Holywell Press, Oxford This book is available direct from Archaeopress or from our website www.archaeopress.com Copyright Archaeopress and the authors 2016 Contents List of Figures and Tables ........................................................................................................................iv Authors’ details ..................................................................................................................................... xii Preface ................................................................................................................................................. xvii Archaeological investigations on the Citadel of Erbil: Background, Framework and Results.............. 1 Dara Al Yaqoobi, Abdullah Khorsheed Khader, Sangar Mohammed, Saber Hassan Hussein, Mary Shepperson and John MacGinnis The site
    [Show full text]