The Local Plan Part 1: Core Strategy Regulation 22 Statement of Consultation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Local Plan Part 1: Core Strategy Regulation 22 Statement of Consultation The Local Plan Part 1: Core Strategy Regulation 22 Statement of Consultation December 2013 This page is intentionally blank 2 Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. Regulation 18 – Summary of the Main Issues Raised 2 2.1 Background 2 2.2 Summary of comments from the public 3 2.3 Summary of comments from Parish/Town Councils 53 2.4 Summary of comments from Borough/County Councillors/MP 64 2.5 Summary of comments from neighbouring local authorities 82 and Derbyshire County Council 2.6 Summary of comments from national bodies 96 2.7 Summary of comments from local groups 123 2.8 Summary of comments from developers, landowners 151 and consultants 3. Regulation 20 – Summary of the Main Issues Raised 202 Appendix A – Persons and bodies invited to make representations 234 under regulation 18 3 This page is intentionally blank 1. Introduction Under Regulation 22 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012, a local authority is required when submitting a local plan to produce a statement setting out: (i) which bodies and persons the local authority invited to make representations under regulation 18, (ii) how those bodies and persons were invited to make representations under regulation 18, (iii) a summary of the main issues raised by the representations made pursuant to regulation 18, (iv) how any representations made pursuant to regulation 18 have been taken into account; (v) if representations were made pursuant to regulation 20, the number of representations made and a summary of the main issues raised in those representations; and (vi) if no representations were made in regulation 20, that no such representations were made. This document has been produced to comply with these requirements. The responses to representations made pursuant to regulation 18 outline how any representations made have been taken into account when the Core Strategy was being produced. There are also responses to some of the representations made pursuant to regulation 20, indicating those representations where further changes to the Core Strategy have been suggested that are supported. 2. Regulation 18 – Summary of the Main Issues Raised 2.1 Background The Borough Council produced the following documents as part of the Regulation 18 consultation that took place from 28 June to 23 August 2013. These were: • Local Plan Part 1 - The Draft Core Strategy; • Sustainability Appraisal; • Draft Infrastructure Delivery Plan; and • Habitats Regulations Assessment The Local Plan Part 1 Pre-Submission Core Strategy sets out the strategic planning policies for the Borough along with the preferred locations for strategic growth sites and indicates which of the adopted Local Plan (2006) policies will be saved and incorporated into Part 2 of the new Local Plan – a Site Allocations and Development Management Policies DPD. The Sustainability Appraisal (SA) is a mechanism for considering and communicating the likely effects of a draft plan, and alternatives, in terms of sustainability issues, with a view to avoiding and mitigating adverse effects and maximising the positives. An SA of Local Plan Part 1 - The Core Strategy is a legal requirement. 2 The Infrastructure Delivery Plan is a key supporting document for the Local Plan Part 1 – The Core Strategy. It sets out the transport, physical, social and green infrastructure required to support the Borough’s future growth up to 2028. In total approximately 360 individual representations were received commenting on the Local Plan Part 1 - The Draft Core Strategy. Consultees were asked to comment on the documents and the policies within the Draft Core Strategy document. The bodies and persons who were invited to make representations is attached at Appendix A. These include all bodies and persons who have previously made representations in respect of previous consultation exercises and/or those whose details were collected when previous public consultation exercises took place by entering their details on attendance sheets. All of these bodies and persons were contacted individually by email. Those who do not have an email address were sent a letter in the post. 2.2 Summary of comments from the public Comments on the Spatial Portrait • Green Belt should be retained at all costs • The majority of the Borough is rural and open. There is nothing that reflects this in the Spatial Portrait. • Needs to describe the landscape and the contrast between the east, west and south west of the Borough. • Might have included the decline in town centres which underlies the need to seek shopping and leisure activities outside the Borough. Increasingly, villages and smaller settlements are margining under the impact of peripheral housing developments. • Would be helpful to include a map of the Borough. • The eastern side of the Borough clearly has a much higher population density and no doubt this affects the emphasis of the document but policies that are relevant to urban sites and populations are, frequently, not relevant to rural landscape and populations. • Needs to include vibrancy and sustainability – some parts of Amber Valley are very vibrant and desirable. • Fails to identify what is distinctive about Amber Valley – that it is predominantly rural. Does not mention the SLA designation, the high level of visitors and tourism in the countryside. • Undervalues the very special landscape in the Ecclesbourne Valley in the west of the Borough. 3 Response The Spatial Portrait has been amended to reflect these suggestions. Comments on the Spatial Vision of Amber Valley • No. 4 – acknowledges that new village development to meet “the needs of the community” will be provided. We support this approach, but feel that the Core Strategy does not include sufficient policy wording to enable this to happen. • Not concentrating growth on the four market towns. • Not sure that sufficient emphasis has been given to the very high quality from a visual, amenity and wildlife perspective of the delightful rural landscape in the west of the Borough. • What about Areas of Multiple Environmental Sensitivity (AMES)? • A worthy vision but: a) Local distinctiveness cannot be maintained in the face of additional standardised design – so often the case with new housing estates. b) Increasingly built-up areas cannot provide increased access to open public space. c) Increased housing provision served by existing roads are likely to lead to more traffic congestion, not less. d) The deployment of forecasts are welcome – if perhaps optimistic in the present economic climate. • Support the statement of villages and rural areas will be protected from unsustainable development, however, should also state that rural areas, especially, should be protected from ‘unsympathetic’ development. • Concentrates on improving the quality of the built environment; it should also take into account the importance of improving and protecting the quality of the existing rural environment – does not only relate to biodiversity but also the unique quality of the landscape, the peace and quiet, and freedom from light pollution etc. • No development should proceed until existing sites, e.g. the Denby commercial site, have been developed and occupied. • Vision/strategy is meaningless as the housing led plan is based on sites put forward by developers (as confirmed by CLLR Bowley at an ‘Have you say’ meeting in January 2013) and which has stifled any serious debate about the locations of future developments. 4 • No mention of protecting and enhancing the countryside and natural landscape. • Should reflect importance of landscape and countryside in west of Borough. Response The Spatial Vision has been amended to reflect some of these suggestions. However, some comments are not relevant to the Spatial Vision. Comments on the Strategic Objectives • No. 10 – The road referred to here needs to be a by-pass to the same standard as the Ripley by-pass and Langley Mill by-pass. A link road will not meet the needs of Codnor or of the traffic using the A610. • Not growing Belper you are creating out of town development problems in Codnor. • These seem good. • Support strategic objectives 7 & 8 • Laudable objectives apart from item 10 – improvements to the transport system are welcome but the A610 link road is a contentious matter. • In the objectives matrix against objective 7 an important policy has not been included – this is Saved Policy EN11 (Agricultural Development). This policy is important in preventing the erosion of settlement patterns in rural areas and it has been used previously to minimise the adverse impact of unsympathetic development. • Strategic Objective 11 aims to mitigate ‘severe’ traffic congestion. This seems unambitious, amounting as it does to an admission that the Core Strategy will lead to traffic congestion and is unsound. • Objective 7 -& 8 supported but not enough about the countryside. Saved policy EN1 should become part of the objectives matrix. • Objectives need to defend the beauty of landscapes in the west of the Borough. Response The Strategic Objectives have been amended to reflect some of these suggestions. However, some comments relate to matters that are too specific to be included in these strategic objectives. 5 Comments on the Spatial Strategy • Not sure that sufficient emphasis has been given to the very high quality from a visual, amenity and wildlife perspective of the delightful rural landscape in the west of the Borough. • The need to protect the Green Belt is highlighted but nothing about the countryside. • Saved Policy EN11 needs including with the other saved policies in Objective 7 matrix – It has been used successfully to control/and guide the location of but not necessarily stop development. It is a very useful policy as it conserves the character of settlement patterns in rural areas. • Infers that EN11 may be replaced by policies in the Site Allocations and Development Management Policies document however am unable to see how the essence of EN11 can be achieved in this second section. • The requirements of the Derby Housing Market do not necessarily coincide with the needs of Amber Valley.
Recommended publications
  • Download Original Attachment
    Owner Name Address Postcode Current Rv THE OWNER TREETOP WORKSHOP THE BOTTOM YARD HORSLEY LN/DERBY RD COXBENCH DERBY DE21 5BD 1950 THE OWNER YEW TREE INN YEW TREE HILL HOLLOWAY MATLOCK, DERBYSHIRE DE4 5AR 3000 THE OWNER THE OLD BAKEHOUSE THE COMMON CRICH MATLOCK, DERBYSHIRE DE4 5BH 4600 THE OWNER ROOM 3 SECOND FLOOR VICTORIA HOUSE THE COMMON, CRICH MATLOCK, DERBYSHIRE DE4 5BH 1150 THE OWNER ROOM 2 SECOND FLOOR VICTORIA HOUSE THE COMMON CRICH MATLOCK, DERBYSHIRE DE4 5BH 800 THE OWNER WORKSHOP SUN LANE CRICH MATLOCK, DERBYSHIRE DE4 5BR 2600 THE OWNER JOVIAL DUTCHMAN THE CROSS CRICH MATLOCK, DERBYSHIRE DE4 5DH 3500 THE OWNER SPRINGFIELDS LEA MAIN ROAD LEA MATLOCK, DERBYSHIRE DE4 5GJ 1275 SLEEKMEAD PROPERTY COMPANY LTD PRIMROSE COTTAGE POTTERS HILL WHEATCROFT MATLOCK DERBYSHIRE DE4 5PH 1400 SLEEKMEAD PROPERTY COMPANY LTD PLAISTOW HALL FARM POTTERS HILL WHEATCROFT MATLOCK DERBYSHIRE DE4 5PH 1400 THE OWNER R/O 47 OXFORD STREET RIPLEY DERBYSHIRE DE5 3AG 2950 MACNEEL & PARTNERS LTD 53 OXFORD STREET RIPLEY DERBYSHIRE DE5 3AH 19000 MACNEEL & PARTNERS LTD OVER 53-57 OXFORD STREET (2399) RIPLEY DERBYSHIRE DE5 3AH 5000 THE OWNER 43A OXFORD STREET RIPLEY DERBYSHIRE DE5 3AH 2475 THE OWNER OXFORD CHAMBERS 41 OXFORD STREET RIPLEY DERBYSHIRE DE5 3AH 2800 THE OWNER OVER 4B OXFORD STREET RIPLEY DERBYSHIRE DE5 3AL 710 THE OWNER 3 WELL STREET RIPLEY DERBYSHIRE DE5 3AR 4550 LOCKWOOD PROPERTIES LTD DE JA VU 23 NOTTINGHAM ROAD RIPLEY DERBYSHIRE DE5 3AS 19500 THE OWNER REAR OF 94 NOTTINGHAM ROAD RIPLEY DERBYSHIRE DE5 3AX 1975 THE OWNER UNIT G PROSPECT COURT 192
    [Show full text]
  • School Administrator South Wingfield Primary School Church Lane South Wingfield Alfreton Derbyshire DE55 7NJ
    School Administrator South Wingfield Primary School Church Lane South Wingfield Alfreton Derbyshire DE55 7NJ School Administrator Newhall Green High School Brailsford Primary School Da Vinci Community College Newall Green High School Main Road St Andrew's View Greenbrow Road Brailsford Ashbourne Breadsall Manchester Derbys Derby Greater Manchester DE6 3DA DE21 4ET M23 2SX School Administrator School Administrator School Administrator Tower View Primary School Little Eaton Primary School Ockbrook School Vancouver Drive Alfreton Road The Settlement Winshill Little Eaton Ockbrook Burton On Trent Derby Derby DE15 0EZ DE21 5AB Derbyshire DE72 3RJ Meadow Lane Infant School Fritchley Under 5's Playgroup Jesse Gray Primary School Meadow Lane The Chapel Hall Musters Road Chilwell Chapel Street West Bridgford Nottinghamshire Fritchley Belper Nottingham NG9 5AA DE56 2FR Nottinghamshire NG2 7DD South East Derbyshire College School Administrator Field Road Oakwood Junior School Ilkeston Holbrook Road Derbyshire Alvaston DE7 5RS Derby Derbyshire DE24 0DD School Secretary School Secretary Leaps and Bounds Day Nursery Holmefields Primary School Ashcroft Primary School Wellington Court Parkway Deepdale Lane Belper Chellaston Sinfin Derbyshire Derby Derby DE56 1UP DE73 1NY Derbyshire DE24 3HF School Administrator Derby Grammar School School Administrator All Saints C of E Primary School Derby Grammar School Wirksworth Infant School Tatenhill Lane Rykneld Road Harrison Drive Rangemore Littleover Wirksworth Burton on Trent Derby Matlock Staffordshire Derbyshire
    [Show full text]
  • TOWNSHIP of BURLINGTON Comprehensive Master Plan
    TOWNSHIP of BURLINGTON Burlington County, New Jersey Comprehensive Master Plan Adopted 07/10/2008 Prepared By Burlington Township Planning DEDICATION AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This 2008 Comprehensive Master Plan is dedicated to all residents of Burlington Township. Special acknowledgement is given to all municipal staff who contribute daily to the well being of our residents. A sincere thank you is given to all Township volunteers whose dedication to municipal service help define the character of our community. Township of Burlington 2008 Mayor and Council Honorable Stephen M. George, Mayor Carl M. Schoenborn, Council President Richard W. Quinn, Jr., President Pro-Tem Brian Carlin, Councilman E. L. Pete Green, Councilman George M. Kozub, Councilman Harry McConnell, Councilman Sandra V. Stewart, Councilwoman Kevin J. McLernon, Administrator Anthony J. Carnivale, Jr., R.M.C., Township Clerk Kenneth S. Domzalski, Esquire, Township Solicitor Robert L. Schreibel, P.E., P.P., C.M.E., Township Engineer 2008 Burlington Planning Board Charleen J. George, Chairperson Robert G. Davis, Vice Chairperson Honorable Stephen M. George, Mayor Brian Carlin, Council Representative and Member William Diamond, Fire Chief and Member Charles Kelly, Member Delbert D. Rife, Member Louis Schimenti, School Board Representative and Member Lacey Walker, Member Joseph Sabatino, Alternate Member #1 Celeste Niles, Alternate Member #2 Planning Board Staff Eileen R. Liss, Planning Board Secretary David M. Serlin, Esquire, Planning Board Solicitor Robert L. Schreibel, P.E., P.P., CME, Burlington Township Engineer Scott Hatfield, P.E., C.M.E., Burlington Township Assistant Engineer Wayne E. Haussler, P.E., P.T.O.E., P.P., Planning Board Traffic Engineer Joseph S.
    [Show full text]
  • Graham Watkins &
    57 Derby Street, Leek Staffordshire, ST13 6HU Tel: 01538 373308 Graham Watkins & Co. Email: [email protected] gw www.grahamwatkins.co.uk Chartered Surveyors, Estate Agents, Auctioneers & Valuers Bungalow Farm, Biggin by Hulland, Ashbourne, Derbyshire, DE6 3FL FOR SALE BY PRIVATE TREATY (subject to Contract) Bungalow Farm, Biggin by Hulland, Nr Ashbourne, Derbyshire, DE6 3FL A SUPERB OPPORTUNITY TO PURCHASE A STUNNING SMALL HOLDING, WITH HUGE POTENTIAL AND BREATHTAKING VIEWS. Bungalow Farm is set in 12.21 acres or thereabouts of productive grassland set in the heart of the Derbyshire Dales with breathtaking views of the surrounding countryside looking towards the Amber Valley District. The homestead comprises of a two-bedroom detached bungalow overlooking the associated land, with a range of agricultural buildings to the rear. The homestead offers considerable development potential, with a range of outbuildings and bungalow ripe for development subject to the necessary planning consents. *NO UPWARD CHAIN* Offers Over £700,000 Directions From Hulland Ward, follow the A517 for half a mile towards Belper, turn left onto Biggin Mill Lane for half a mile then turn left onto Nether Lane and follow for half a mile and the property will be found on the right-hand side, indicated by our For Sale board. Bungalow Farm is a stone and tiled bungalow set in the beautiful Derbyshire Dales with 12.21 acres of grassland or thereabouts and range of agricultural buildings. The homestead is approached from the council road by its own private driveway. The Accommodation of the dwelling at Bungalow Farm Comprises: Hallway – 4.15m x 1.68m With solid floor Kitchen – 4.92m x 3.18m With solid fuel Rayburn which heats the hot water, red tiled floor, sink unit and part tiled walls with airing cupboard off.
    [Show full text]
  • Derbyshire Parish Registers. Marriages
    ^iiii iii! mwmm mmm: 'mm m^ iilili! U 942-51019 ^. Aalp V.8 1379096 GENEAUO^JY COLLECTION ALLEN COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY 3 1833 00727 4282 DERBYSHIRE PARISH REGISTERS. riDarrtages. VIII. PHILLIMORES PARISH REGISTER SERIES. VOL. CLXIV (DERBYSHIRE, VOL. VIII.) One hundred and fifty printed. uf-ecj.^. Derbyshire Parish Registers. (IDarriaoes. Edited by W. P. W. PHILLIMORE, M.A., B.C.L., AND Ll. Ll. SIMPSON. VOL. VIII. yJ HonOon: Issued to the Subscribers by Phillimore & Co., Ltd., 124, Chancery Lane. — PREFACE This volume of Marriage Registers, the eighth of the Derbyshire series, contains the Registers of nine parishes, besides an odd Register for Ilkeston parish, omitted from the last volume. 1379096 It has not been thought needful to print the entries verbatim. They are reduced to a common form, and the following con- tractions, as before, have been freely used : w. = widower or widow. p. = of the parish of. co. = in the county of. dioc.= in the diocese of. lie. = marriage licence. It should be remembered that previous to 1752 the year was calculated as beginning on the 25th March, instead of the I St of January, so that a Marriage taking place on say 20th February, 1625, would be on that date in 1626 according to our reckoning ; but as the civil and ecclesiastical year were both used, this is sometimes expressed by 20th February, i62f. In all cases where the marriage is stated to have taken place by Licence, that fact is recorded, as the searcher thereby knows that further information as to age, parentage, and voca- tion of the parties is probably recoverable from the Allegations in the Archdeaconry or other ofifice from which the Licence was issued.
    [Show full text]
  • Land at Blacksmith's Arms
    Land off North Road, Glossop Education Impact Assessment Report v1-4 (Initial Research Feedback) for Gladman Developments 12th June 2013 Report by Oliver Nicholson EPDS Consultants Conifers House Blounts Court Road Peppard Common Henley-on-Thames RG9 5HB 0118 978 0091 www.epds-consultants.co.uk 1. Introduction 1.1.1. EPDS Consultants has been asked to consider the proposed development for its likely impact on schools in the local area. 1.2. Report Purpose & Scope 1.2.1. The purpose of this report is to act as a principle point of reference for future discussions with the relevant local authority to assist in the negotiation of potential education-specific Section 106 agreements pertaining to this site. This initial report includes an analysis of the development with regards to its likely impact on local primary and secondary school places. 1.3. Intended Audience 1.3.1. The intended audience is the client, Gladman Developments, and may be shared with other interested parties, such as the local authority(ies) and schools in the area local to the proposed development. 1.4. Research Sources 1.4.1. The contents of this initial report are based on publicly available information, including relevant data from central government and the local authority. 1.5. Further Research & Analysis 1.5.1. Further research may be conducted after this initial report, if required by the client, to include a deeper analysis of the local position regarding education provision. This activity may include negotiation with the relevant local authority and the possible submission of Freedom of Information requests if required.
    [Show full text]
  • Rasselas, Prince of Abyssinia Johnson, Samuel
    Rasselas, Prince of Abyssinia Johnson, Samuel Published: 1759 Categorie(s): Fiction, Fantasy Source: http://www.gutenberg.org 1 About Johnson: Samuel Johnson LL.D. (September 18 [O.S. September 7] 1709 – 13 December 1784), often referred to simply as Dr Johnson, was one of England's greatest literary figures: a poet, essayist, biographer, lexicographer and often considered the finest critic of English literature. He was also a great wit and prose stylist whose bons mots are still frequently quoted in print today. Among students of philosophy, Dr Johnson is per- haps best known for his "refutation" of Bishop Berkeley's ideal- ism. During a conversation with his biographer, Johnson be- came infuriated at the suggestion that Berkeley's idealism could not be refuted. In his anger, Johnson powerfully kicked a nearby stone and proclaimed of Berkeley's theory, "I refute it thus!". Source: Wikipedia Note: This book is brought to you by Feedbooks http://www.feedbooks.com Strictly for personal use, do not use this file for commercial purposes. 2 Chapter 1 Description of a Palace in a Valley Ye who listen with credulity to the whispers of fancy, and pur- sue with eagerness the phantoms of hope; who expect that age will perform the promises of youth, and that the deficiencies of the present day will be supplied by the morrow, attend to the history of Rasselas, Prince of Abyssinia. Rasselas was the fourth son of the mighty Emperor in whose dominions the father of waters begins his course - whose bounty pours down the streams of plenty, and scatters over the world the harvests of Egypt.
    [Show full text]
  • Tla Hearing Board
    TLA HEARING BOARD Location : Chennai Hearing Schedule from 01/09/2021 to 30/09/2021 Dated : 06/08/2021 10:15:28 S.No TM No Class Hearing Proprietor Name Agent Name Mode of Date Hearing 1 4345947 19 01-09-2021 M/s. ANR DESIGNER TILES LIMITED SUNEER AND ASSOCIATES video conferencing 2 4450520 14 01-09-2021 MUAAD MOHAMMED ASHRAF SUNEER AND ASSOCIATES video conferencing 3 4450522 35 01-09-2021 MUAAD MOHAMMED ASHRAF SUNEER AND ASSOCIATES video conferencing 4 4450526 29 01-09-2021 MAJEED PULLANCHERI SUNEER AND ASSOCIATES video conferencing 5 4439076 24 01-09-2021 SARAVAN TEX L.R. SWAMI CO. video conferencing 6 4430578 5 01-09-2021 DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES LIMITED TRADING AS DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES video conferencing MANUFACTURER AND TRADER LIMITED TRADING AS MANUFACTURER AND TRADER 7 4425495 5 01-09-2021 TABLETS (INDIA) LIMITED TABLETS (INDIA) LIMITED video conferencing 8 4457725 41 01-09-2021 THG Publishing Private Limited MOHAN ASSOCIATES. video conferencing 9 4430600 30 01-09-2021 C.MUTHUKUMARASWAMI P. C .N. RAGHUPATHY. video conferencing 10 1328727 5 01-09-2021 K. N. BIOSCIENCES (INDIA) PVT. LTD RAO & RAO. video conferencing 11 4341141 41 01-09-2021 M/S. MARIGOLD CREATIVE PVT. LTD SUNEER AND ASSOCIATES video conferencing 12 4427219 14 01-09-2021 GRT JEWELLERS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED L.R. SWAMI CO. video conferencing 13 4427237 14 01-09-2021 GRT JEWELLERS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED L.R. SWAMI CO. video conferencing 14 4427239 14 01-09-2021 GRT JEWELLERS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED L.R. SWAMI CO.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Derbyshire County RBL Magazine
    The Magazine of the Royal British Legion in Derbyshire February/March 2014 Incorporating the Derbyshire LegionLetter Newsletter Registered Charity No. 219279 Shoulder to shoulder with all who serve Vol. 4 Issue 3 County Conference Edition County Chaplin Rev Dr Jocelyn Lewis, Jessica Lee MP, County Vice-Chairman Philip Skawski and John Cam County Treasurer The Derbyshire RBL County Conference 2014 was held at Wirkworth Townhall on 8th February attended by 1Guest Speaker, 17 Delegates, 23 Visitors, 22 Officers/County Committee, 1 Women’s Section, 3 Standard Bearers and 2 Conference Committee making 69 people. The Standards were paraded on and the Act of Homage and Kohima Exhortation were pronounced. County Chaplin Rev Dr Jocelyn Lewis led the conference in prayers. After the welcome by Mr T. Hall Chairman of Wirkworth Branch, the County President Bill Else gave his address in which he mentioned the work by Legion Members in the County and thanked them for their hard work for Welfare and the Poppy Appeal. In place of the Chairman’s Address, Bill Parkin member of the Board of Trustees gave us the Corporate Message which included Property trusts and why at the moment they are frozen while a survey is carried out. He also gave us an update of the way Welfare is being delivered following “Pathway for Growth” Jessica Lee MP told conference the Parliamentary Under-Secretary for Defence Anna Soubry who is also MP for Broxstowe has particularly welcomed the new Ambassador role in the Legion and has promised to work with the Legion in promoting WWI commemorations as well as our welfare work.
    [Show full text]
  • International Passenger Survey, 2008
    UK Data Archive Study Number 5993 - International Passenger Survey, 2008 Airline code Airline name Code 2L 2L Helvetic Airways 26099 2M 2M Moldavian Airlines (Dump 31999 2R 2R Star Airlines (Dump) 07099 2T 2T Canada 3000 Airln (Dump) 80099 3D 3D Denim Air (Dump) 11099 3M 3M Gulf Stream Interntnal (Dump) 81099 3W 3W Euro Manx 01699 4L 4L Air Astana 31599 4P 4P Polonia 30699 4R 4R Hamburg International 08099 4U 4U German Wings 08011 5A 5A Air Atlanta 01099 5D 5D Vbird 11099 5E 5E Base Airlines (Dump) 11099 5G 5G Skyservice Airlines 80099 5P 5P SkyEurope Airlines Hungary 30599 5Q 5Q EuroCeltic Airways 01099 5R 5R Karthago Airlines 35499 5W 5W Astraeus 01062 6B 6B Britannia Airways 20099 6H 6H Israir (Airlines and Tourism ltd) 57099 6N 6N Trans Travel Airlines (Dump) 11099 6Q 6Q Slovak Airlines 30499 6U 6U Air Ukraine 32201 7B 7B Kras Air (Dump) 30999 7G 7G MK Airlines (Dump) 01099 7L 7L Sun d'Or International 57099 7W 7W Air Sask 80099 7Y 7Y EAE European Air Express 08099 8A 8A Atlas Blue 35299 8F 8F Fischer Air 30399 8L 8L Newair (Dump) 12099 8Q 8Q Onur Air (Dump) 16099 8U 8U Afriqiyah Airways 35199 9C 9C Gill Aviation (Dump) 01099 9G 9G Galaxy Airways (Dump) 22099 9L 9L Colgan Air (Dump) 81099 9P 9P Pelangi Air (Dump) 60599 9R 9R Phuket Airlines 66499 9S 9S Blue Panorama Airlines 10099 9U 9U Air Moldova (Dump) 31999 9W 9W Jet Airways (Dump) 61099 9Y 9Y Air Kazakstan (Dump) 31599 A3 A3 Aegean Airlines 22099 A7 A7 Air Plus Comet 25099 AA AA American Airlines 81028 AAA1 AAA Ansett Air Australia (Dump) 50099 AAA2 AAA Ansett New Zealand (Dump)
    [Show full text]
  • Millington Green Biggin by Hulland, Ashbourne, DE6 3FL
    Millington Green Biggin By Hulland, Ashbourne, DE6 3FL Millington Green Biggin By Hulland, Ashbourne, DE6 3FL £530,000 A spacious three bedroom detached stone house with an adjoining two storey annexe. Requiring some cosmetic modernisation and set in 0.31 acres plus two paddocks totalling 0.72 acres providing equestrian potential. This spacious detached stone property and separate two storey annexe total a gross internal area of 2250 sq.ft internal. A great opportunity for versatile living, with the flexibility of the two storey separate annexe offering space for a dependant relative, or there is the potential to combine the current dwelling and annexe together, which would provide a large country home. Set in 0.31 acres of gardens and enjoying impressive countryside views plus an additional two paddocks totalling 0.72 acres. Biggin by Hulland is a small hamlet located just outside Hulland Ward, conveniently located for Ashbourne and commuting to Derby and the A38. Accommodation Main entrance door opens into the hall with doors off to the main rooms including the guest cloakroom fitted with a white suite, stairs off and under stairs cupboard. The dining room has a part exposed brick wall, door to kitchen and double doors into the dual aspect sitting room that has a stone fireplace and inset multi fuel stove set on a stone hearth. The L-shaped fitted kitchen has a range of base mounted units with roll top work surfaces over and one and a half bowl sink and drainer. There are spaces for a cooker and fridge plus plumbing for a dishwasher.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.0 Introduction
    1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 THE COUNCIL’S FIVE YEAR REQUIREMENT AND SUPPLY POSITION 3.0 NATIONAL PLANNING POLICY AND GUIDANCE 4.0 ADOPTED AND EMERGING LOCAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 5.0 HOUSING REQUIREMENT 6.0 FIVE YEAR LAND SUPPLY 7.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 – JOHNSON BROOK TEN YEAR TRAJECTORY APPENDIX 2 – INSPECTOR’S LETTER RE CORE STRATEGY EXAMINATION 12TH MAY 2014 APPENDIX 3 – APPEAL DECISION APP/M1005/A/14/2226553, LAND AT ROES LANE, CRICH – 13TH JULY 2015 1 Johnson Brook Ltd AVBC – Five Year Housing Land Supply Review December 2015 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Johnson Brook (JB) are instructed by to review the updated position on five year housing land supply (November 2015) published by Amber Valley (‘the Council’) in July 2015. 1.2 Our assessment (‘the Assessment’) provides a detailed commentary on all aspects of ‘the ‘statement’ in order to establish whether the Council’s five year land supply position is robust. 1.3 The Council have previously acknowledged a deliverable five year housing land supply cannot be demonstrated, indeed this was the case in a recent appeal decision at Roes Lane, Crich1 (13 July 2015) to which the appointed Inspector found that the housing land supply was somewhere between 35% and 65% of the requirement. In contrast, the Council’s recently adopted position on five year housing land supply details a supply of 5.15 years for the period 2015/16 to 2019/20. 1.4 The Council have not produced a detailed commentary on specific sites, however have produced a trajectory providing the Council’s anticipated timings and delivery rates for sites forming the five year housing land supply position.
    [Show full text]