1 Commission on Justice in Wales Submission by Professor R. Gwynedd Parry Department of Welsh, Academi Hywel Teifi, Swansea

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 Commission on Justice in Wales Submission by Professor R. Gwynedd Parry Department of Welsh, Academi Hywel Teifi, Swansea Commission on Justice in Wales Submission by Professor R. Gwynedd Parry Department of Welsh, Academi Hywel Teifi, Swansea University. Saturn is fallen, am I too to fall? Am I to leave this haven of my rest, This cradle of my glory, this soft clime, This calm luxuriance of blissful light, These crystalline pavilions, and pure fanes, Of all my lucent empire?1 1. I am grateful for the invitation to submit evidence to the Commission. The justice system in Wales has been a constant in my research over the years.2 In 2012, I published a monograph in the Welsh language which addressed key themes in the development of the law in contemporary Wales.3 In the recent past, I have submitted evidence to consultations initiated by the Welsh Government and the National Assembly for Wales on the subject of a separate jurisdiction for Wales. Last year, I published an article in the Irish Jurist on the same subject in the light of recent legislative developments.4 Much of this submission is based on that publication. 2. I must therefore apologise if what follows has a ring of familiarity to some members of the Commission. However, and without unnecessary repetition, I shall succinctly summarise what I regard as being the overarching issue facing the Commission. 1 Extract from Hyperion by John Keats. 2 For example: R. Gwynedd Parry, “The Council of Legal Education in Wales: an idea whose time has come?” in Emőd Veress (ed.) Multilingualism and Law (Cluj-Napoca: Sapientia University Publishing, 2016), pp. 49- 65; R. Gwynedd Parry, “The Three Ages of Legal Scholarship in Wales” in T. G. Watkin (ed.) The Carno Poisonings and Other Essays, (WLHS, 2013), pp. 49-71; R. Gwynedd Parry, “Bilingual Legal Scholarship in Wales: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives” in Xabier Arzoz (ed.), Bilingual Higher Education in the Legal Context: Group Rights, State Policies and Globalisation (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2012), pp. 215-257. R. Gwynedd Parry, “Rheithgorau Dwyieithog: Penbleth Geltaidd?” (2011) (9) Gwerddon http://www.gwerddon.org; R. Gwynedd Parry, “Higher education and Article 8.1.e of the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages: a Welsh ‘opportunity avoided’?” in Parry RG and Dunbar R, eds., The European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages: Legal Challenges and Opportunities (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 2008), pp. 253-75; R. Gwynedd Parry, "An important obligation of citizenship: language, citizenship and jury service", (2007) 27 (2) Legal Studies 188-215; R. Gwynedd Parry, "Beth yw Trosedd? Golwg ar yr Elfennau Sylfaenol.", (2004) 3 Cylchgrawn Cyfraith a Pholisi Cymru 223-236; R. Gwynedd Parry, "Random Selection, Linguistic Rights and the Jury Trial in Wales" [2002] Criminal Law Review 805-816; R. Gwynedd Parry, "Hyrwyddo'r Gymraeg ym Myd y Gyfraith- Beth yw Cyfraniad Adrannau Cyfraith y Brifysgol?", (2002) 1 Cylchgrawn Cyfraith Cymru 387-395; R. Gwynedd Parry, "Yr Iaith Gymraeg a'r Tribiwnlys Apêl Cyflogaeth - ystyried y penderfyniad yn Williams v. Cowell", (2001) 1 Cylchgrawn Cyfraith Cymru 178-182. 3 R. Gwynedd Parry, Cymru’r Gyfraith: Sylwadau ar Hunaniaeth Gyfreithiol (Caerdydd: Gwasg Prifysgol Cymru, 2012). 4 R. Gwynedd Parry, “Is breaking up hard to do? The case for a separate Welsh jurisdiction” (2017) 57 The Irish Jurist, 61-93. 1 3. The Commission’s terms of reference are broad, and rightly so. There are many specific matters relating to the administration of justice in Wales which warrant examination. My own interest lies in the legal infrastructure and in the mechanisms whereby justice issues can be considered and debated, and policy can be devised and implemented. By infrastructure I mean legal institutions and structures, and authority for justice policy. More specifically, I believe that the most important question facing the Commission is whether the legal system in Wales can continue, to all meaningful purposes, as an English circuit, or whether the time has come for Wales to have the legal architecture that befits a self-governing nation within the United Kingdom. Should Wales have the same or similar legal institutions and legal autonomy as Scotland and Northern Ireland? In my opinion, it is when this is answered that all the other myriad issues facing justice in Wales can be addressed. 4. The imprints of the past bear heavily on the current constitutional arrangements in relation to the administration of justice in Wales. The Tudor reforms of the sixteenth century intensified the annexation of Wales by England. By the middle of the nineteenth century, Wales was fully incorporated into the English legal system. That remains the bottom line constitutionally in so far as the legal system is concerned. Of course, there never existed a “union” between England and Wales, but conquest followed by annexation. The present legal jurisdiction of England (and Wales) is the product of this historical legacy and continues, fundamentally, and despite a few recent concessions, to function on this premise. 5. This is not to deny those notable examples of legal devolution in recent years. A good example has been the Administrative Court in Wales, which has ensured that judicial reviews of the actions of the Welsh Government or the National Assembly have been heard in Wales. The creation of the unified Courts and Tribunals Service in 2011, and the establishing of the Office of President of the Welsh Tribunals in 2017, are other examples. But these innovations exist within the centuries-old paradigm of the unified jurisdiction. 6. Therein lies the problem. Wales is no longer, constitutionally or politically, annexed by England. Constitutionally, there has been a change from a state of “annexation” to that of a “union”. But rather like the royal standard or the union flag, the unified jurisdiction of England and Wales does not reflect this change and operates on that basis which was infamously stated in the Encyclopaedia Britannica and quoted by Professor Thomas Watkin in his submission to this Commission: “for Wales see England”. 7. Perhaps the change from “annexation” to “union” requires further explanation. On the 3rd March 2011 the people of Wales declared in a referendum, instigated in accordance with the Government of Wales Act (UK) 2006, that the National Assembly for Wales should serve as a primary law maker, or legislature, for Wales.5 The 1998 Act (UK) had established a limited form of executive devolution, with powers to make secondary or subordinate legislation and to exercise executive powers.6 The 2006 Act, however, created the means for legislative devolution and 5 Thereby implementing the recommendations in the All Wales Convention Report (Crown Copyright, 2009). 6 See Vernon Bogdanor, Devolution in the United Kingdom (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), p. 254. 2 also ensured the constitutional separation of the Welsh Government and the National Assembly consistent with a parliamentary model of government.7 8. But perhaps the actual moment when a state of “union” came into existence was with the passing of the Wales Act 2017. The Act places two important principles on a statutory footing, principles which negate any idea that the National Assembly is merely a subsidiary of the Westminster parliament. The first relates to the permanence of the Assembly and the Welsh Government. The Act states that the Assembly and the Welsh Government will not be abolished without the people of Wales voting for that course of action in a referendum.8 The second principle is that the Westminster parliament will not normally legislate with regard to devolved matters without the consent of the National Assembly for Wales.9 These principles effectively render the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty redundant on devolved powers, and create a new constitutional model based on popular sovereignty.10 In the parlance of another age we would say that Wales now has ‘Home Rule’ within the United Kingdom. This has changed completely the constitutional relationship between Wales and England, and Wales’s place within the Union. It may even be said that it is the first true “act of union” in Welsh history in that it recognises the sovereignty of the Welsh nation within the Union. 9. Despite this, there exists some resistance to recognise this fundamental change to Wales’s constitutional status. Rather like the Titans in Keats’s poem, some struggle to come to terms with it all. The entire notion of self-government for Wales, or even Welsh nationhood itself, can be a source of anxiety. Wales is wonderfully sui generis, it is implied, and should be well pleased not to have the sort of legal institutions enjoyed by the other self-governing nations or autonomous regions of the world. 10. The Commission must see all of that for what it is. The issue now is not whether Wales is a nation, is sufficiently different from England, or whether legislative devolution is a good thing or a bad thing: these are all matters resolved by democratic mandate and the law. What matters now is whether the continuation of a single jurisdiction of England and Wales (that is, England with Wales subsumed within it) can be said to be constitutionally acceptable. 11. In the meantime, a body of law which applies only in Wales is increasing. Already, divergence in key areas of policy is creating legal divergence between England and Wales, especially in the fields of planning, housing and education law. The Wales Act 2014 conferred tax-raising powers on the National Assembly, powers that increase with the Wales Act 2017. The divergence between laws in Wales and laws in England is also driven by legislative provisions made for England in Westminster that do not apply in Wales.11 Westminster statutes may be amended both by the Westminster 7 See Dafydd Elis-Thomas, “From Body Corporate to Parliamentary Service” (2005) 4 Wales Journal of Law and Policy, 12.
Recommended publications
  • The Role and Importance of the Welsh Language in Wales's Cultural Independence Within the United Kingdom
    The role and importance of the Welsh language in Wales’s cultural independence within the United Kingdom Sylvain Scaglia To cite this version: Sylvain Scaglia. The role and importance of the Welsh language in Wales’s cultural independence within the United Kingdom. Linguistics. 2012. dumas-00719099 HAL Id: dumas-00719099 https://dumas.ccsd.cnrs.fr/dumas-00719099 Submitted on 19 Jul 2012 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. UNIVERSITE DU SUD TOULON-VAR FACULTE DES LETTRES ET SCIENCES HUMAINES MASTER RECHERCHE : CIVILISATIONS CONTEMPORAINES ET COMPAREES ANNÉE 2011-2012, 1ère SESSION The role and importance of the Welsh language in Wales’s cultural independence within the United Kingdom Sylvain SCAGLIA Under the direction of Professor Gilles Leydier Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................. 1 WALES: NOT AN INDEPENDENT STATE, BUT AN INDEPENDENT NATION ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Welsh Language Act 1967
    Status: This is the original version (as it was originally enacted). Welsh Language Act 1967 1967 CHAPTER 66 An Act to make further provision with respect to the Welsh language and references in Acts of Parliament to Wales. [27th July 1967] Whereas it is proper that the Welsh language should be freely used by those who so desire in the hearing of legal proceedings in Wales and Monmouthshire; that further provision should be made for the use of that language, with the like effect as English, in the conduct of other official or public business there; and that Wales should be distinguished from England in the interpretation of future Acts of Parliament: Be it therefore enacted by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:— 1 Use of Welsh in legal proceedings. (1) In any legal proceeding in Wales or Monmouthshire the Welsh language may be spoken by any party, witness or other person who desires to use it, subject in the case of proceedings in a court other than a magistrates' court to such prior notice as may be required by rules of court; and any necessary provision for interpretation shall be made accordingly. (2) Section 1 of the Welsh Courts Act 1942, and in paragraph 7 of the Schedule to the Pensions Appeal Tribunals Act 1943 the words from the beginning to " language and", are hereby repealed. 2 Welsh versions of statutory forms etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Welsh Tribal Law and Custom in the Middle Ages
    THOMAS PETER ELLIS WELSH TRIBAL LAW AND CUSTOM IN THE MIDDLE AGES IN 2 VOLUMES VOLUME I1 CONTENTS VOLUME I1 p.1~~V. THE LAWOF CIVILOBLIGATIONS . I. The Formalities of Bargaining . .a . 11. The Subject-matter of Agreements . 111. Responsibility for Acts of Animals . IV. Miscellaneous Provisions . V. The Game Laws \TI. Co-tillage . PARTVI. THE LAWOF CRIMESAND TORTS. I. Introductory . 11. The Law of Punishtnent . 111. ' Saraad ' or Insult . 1V. ' Galanas ' or Homicide . V. Theft and Surreption . VI. Fire or Arson . VII. The Law of Accessories . VIII. Other Offences . IX. Prevention of Crime . PARTVIl. THE COURTSAND JUDICIARY . I. Introductory . 11. The Ecclesiastical Courts . 111. The Courts of the ' Maerdref ' and the ' Cymwd ' IV. The Royal Supreme Court . V. The Raith of Country . VI. Courts in Early English Law and in Roman Law VII. The Training and Remuneration of Judges . VIII. The Challenge of Judges . IX. Advocacy . vi CONTENTS PARTVIII. PRE-CURIALSURVIVALS . 237 I. The Law of Distress in Ireland . 239 11. The Law of Distress in Wales . 245 111. The Law of Distress in the Germanic and other Codes 257 IV. The Law of Boundaries . 260 PARTIX. THE L4w OF PROCEDURE. 267 I. The Enforcement of Jurisdiction . 269 11. The Law of Proof. Raith and Evideilce . , 301 111. The Law of Pleadings 339 IV. Judgement and Execution . 407 PARTX. PART V Appendices I to XI11 . 415 Glossary of Welsh Terms . 436 THE LAW OF CIVIL OBLIGATIONS THE FORMALITIES OF BARGAINING I. Ilztroductory. 8 I. The Welsh Law of bargaining, using the word bargain- ing in a wide sense to cover all transactions of a civil nature whereby one person entered into an undertaking with another, can be considered in two aspects, the one dealing with the form in which bargains were entered into, or to use the Welsh term, the ' bond of bargain ' forming the nexus between the parties to it, the other dealing with the nature of the bargain entered int0.l $2.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Legislation (Wales) Bill
    Number: WG34368 Welsh Government Consultation Document Draft Legislation (Wales) Bill Date of issue : 20 March 2018 Action required : Responses by 12 June 2018 Mae’r ddogfen yma hefyd ar gael yn Gymraeg. This document is also available in Welsh. © Crown Copyright Overview This document sets out the Welsh Government’s proposals to improve the accessibility and statutory interpretation of Welsh law, and seeks views on the Draft Legislation (Wales) Bill. How to respond Please send your written response to the address below or by email to the address provided. Further information Large print, Braille and alternative language and related versions of this document are available on documents request. Contact details For further information: Office of the Legislative Counsel Welsh Government Cathays Park Cardiff CF10 3NQ email: [email protected] telephone: 0300 025 0375 Data protection The Welsh Government will be data controller for any personal data you provide as part of your response to the consultation. Welsh Ministers have statutory powers they will rely on to process this personal data which will enable them to make informed decisions about how they exercise their public functions. Any response you send us will be seen in full by Welsh Government staff dealing with the issues which this consultation is about or planning future consultations. In order to show that the consultation was carried out properly, the Welsh Government intends to publish a summary of the responses to this document. We may also publish responses in full. Normally, the name and address (or part of the address) of the person or 1 organisation who sent the response are published with the response.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservative Agenda for Constitutional Reform
    UCL DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE The Constitution Unit Department of Political Science UniversityThe Constitution College London Unit 29–30 Tavistock Square London WC1H 9QU phone: 020 7679 4977 fax: 020 7679 4978 The Conservative email: [email protected] www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit A genda for Constitutional The Constitution Unit at UCL is the UK’s foremost independent research body on constitutional change. It is part of the UCL School of Public Policy. THE CONSERVATIVE Robert Hazell founded the Constitution Unit in 1995 to do detailed research and planning on constitutional reform in the UK. The Unit has done work on every aspect AGENDA of the UK’s constitutional reform programme: devolution in Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland and the English regions, reform of the House of Lords, electoral reform, R parliamentary reform, the new Supreme Court, the conduct of referendums, freedom eform Prof FOR CONSTITUTIONAL of information, the Human Rights Act. The Unit is the only body in the UK to cover the whole of the constitutional reform agenda. REFORM The Unit conducts academic research on current or future policy issues, often in collaboration with other universities and partners from overseas. We organise regular R programmes of seminars and conferences. We do consultancy work for government obert and other public bodies. We act as special advisers to government departments and H parliamentary committees. We work closely with government, parliament and the azell judiciary. All our work has a sharply practical focus, is concise and clearly written, timely and relevant to policy makers and practitioners. The Unit has always been multi disciplinary, with academic researchers drawn mainly from politics and law.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Welsh Language
    Index Abse, Leo, 193 Coalitionism, 157 Annan, Lord, Olairman of the Commit- Committee on Scottish Affairs, 56 tee on Broadcasting 1974, 76 Commonwealth Office, 60 Army, British, 120 Congested Districts Board for the High­ Arson, 1979-80 campaign in Wales, 89 lands 1897, 150 Assembly, 4 Conservatism and Unionism, 139-70 Scottish, 187, 188, 189, 191, 192 political ideas and practice, 143-4 Welsh, 96, 187, 191, 192, 194 territorial politics, 143 Conservative Irish policy, 153 Balfour, A. J., 153, 155, 157 Conservative Party, 139-70 passim 'Barnett formula', 21, 24 in Scotland and Wales, 14-16 Bi-lingualism in Wales, 69. 70, 75, 78, and voting, 227-47 88 in Wales, 73 bi-lingual education, 83, 87 and Welsh language, 93-4 schools, 81, 82 Constitution, Royal Commission on 'BloodySunday',30January 1972,114 (Crowther, Kilbrandon), 3-4, 13, Board of Trade, 36, 37, 45, 50 16, 94, 188-9, 191 Boer War, 148, 154, 156 Constitutional Convention (NI) 1975, Bonar Law, 157 117' 126 Border Poll Act 1973, 122 CoS IRA, 42, 53 Boundaries between Northern Ireland Council for Wales and Monmouthshire, and Irish Republic, 123 report on The Welsh Language Bowen Committee 1973, 71, 94 Today 1963, 72 British Leyland, 19, 42, 48, 51, 53 Council for the Welsh Language, 72, 92, 94,95 Cabinet and ministries, 60 Council of Ireland, 116, ll7, 124 Callaghan, James, 17, Ill, ll2, 113, Crossman, Richard, 17, 18, 191 127 Diary 1976, 14 Campaign for Democracy in Ulster, Ill Crown, the, 1-3, 100, 101, 102, 104, Campbell-Bannerman, Sir H., 155 119 Carmarthen by-election 1966, 183 Crowther-Hunt, Lord, 191 Central Policy Review Staff Report, 27 Olamberlain, Neville, 148, 159, 161 Dalyell, Tam, 194.
    [Show full text]
  • Striking the Right Balance: Proposals for a Welsh Language Bill
    Number: WG32353 Welsh Government White Paper Consultation Document Striking the right balance: proposals for a Welsh Language Bill Date of issue: 9 August 2017 Action required: Responses by 31 October 2017 Mae’r ddogfen yma hefyd ar gael yn Gymraeg. This document is also available in Welsh. © Crown copyright Striking the right balance: proposals for a Welsh Language Bill Overview The purpose of this consultation is to seek views on the Welsh Government’s proposals for a Welsh Language Bill. Our proposals relate to the arrangements to promote and facilitate the use of the Welsh language, and make improvements to the Welsh Language Standards system. How to respond Responses to this consultation should be e-mailed/posted to the address below to arrive by 31 October 2017 at the latest. Further information Large print, Braille and alternative language and related versions of this document are available on documents request. Preparing for a Welsh Language Bill – Call for evidence: summary of responses gov.wales/docs/dcells/publications/170718-wl-bill-sor- en.pdf Cymraeg 2050: A million Welsh speakers gov.wales/docs/dcells/publications/170711-welsh- language-strategy-eng.pdf The consultation documents can be accessed from the Welsh Government’s website at www.gov.wales/consultations Contact details For further information: Welsh Language Bill Team Welsh Language Division Welsh Government Cathays Park Cardiff CF10 3NQ e-mail: [email protected] Tel: 0300 0604400 Data protection How the views and information you give us will be used Any response you send us will be seen in full by Welsh Government staff dealing with the issues which this consultation is about.
    [Show full text]
  • Unique Paths to Devolution Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland
    Unique Paths to Devolution Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland Arthur Aughey, Eberhard Bort, John Osmond The Institute of Welsh Affairs exists to promote quality research and informed debate affecting the cultural, social, political and economic well-being of Wales. The IWA is an independent organisation owing no allegiance to any political or economic interest group. Our only interest is in seeing Wales flourish as a country in which to work and live. We are funded by a range of organisations and individuals, including the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust, the Esmée Fairbairn Foundation, the Waterloo Foundation and PricewaterhouseCoopers. For more information about the Institute, its publications, and how to join, either as an individual or corporate supporter, contact: IWA - Institute of Welsh Affairs 4 Cathedral Road Cardiff CF11 9LJ Tel 029 2066 0820 Fax 029 2023 3741 Email [email protected] Web www.iwa.org.uk www.clickonwales.org £7.50 ISBN 978 1 904773 56 6 February 2011 The authors Arthur Aughey is Professor of Politics at the University of Ulster and a Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts. He is a Senior Fellow of the Centre for British Politics at the University of Hull and Fellow of the Institute for British Irish Studies at University College Dublin. His recent publications include Nationalism Devolution and the Challenge to the United Kingdom State (London: Pluto Press 2001); Northern Ireland Politics: After the Belfast Agreement (London: Routledge 2005); and The Politics of Englishness (Manchester: Manchester University Press 2007). He is currently a Leverhulme Major Research Fellow and gratefully acknowledges its financial assistance in the writing of this essay.
    [Show full text]
  • Codification of Welsh Law Association of London Welsh Lawyers Lord Lloyd-Jones, Justice of the Supreme Court 8 March 2018
    Codification of Welsh Law Association of London Welsh Lawyers Lord Lloyd-Jones, Justice of The Supreme Court 8 March 2018 I have been asked to say something about the context in which issue of the codification arises. I will identify the problem and Nicholas Paines QC and the Counsel General will then tell you how they propose to solve it. This is a very exciting time for the law in Wales. Since the acquisition by the National Assembly of primary law making powers under Part 4 of GOWA 2006, the extensive use made by the National Assembly of these powers means that for the first time since the age of the Tudors it has once again become meaningful to speak of Welsh law as a living system of law. As a result of this, and as a result of the corresponding development of Westminster legislating for England only, we are now witnessing a rapidly growing divergence between English law and Welsh law. At present this is particularly apparent in areas such as education, planning, social services and residential tenancies. No doubt, this divergence will accelerate and extend more broadly when the Wales Act 2017 – our fourth devolution settlement but the first on a reserved powers basis - comes into force shortly. The Law Commission is the Law Commission of England and Wales. From the start of devolution it has worked closely with the Welsh Government and the National Assembly. In the most recent phase of devolution in Wales, the Assembly has used its primary legislative powers to implement Law Commission recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • Devolution, Debate and Change: Changing the UK’S Constitutional Settlements Carol Howells and Edwin Parks
    Chapter 2 Devolution, debate and change: Changing the UK’s constitutional settlements Carol Howells and Edwin Parks Abstract Devolution has been ‘a process not an event’ resulting in new constitutional settlements . This chapter covers the processes of devolution, processes which mirror the first 50 years of the Open University and the first 22 years of the OU Law School. The chapter explores the devolution of powers to parliaments in Scotland and Wales. It begins with the referendums of the early 1970s and traces events leading up to both the initial transfer of powers and those resulting in subsequent transfer of powers. The process has not been without its critics and the use of differing models helped create complexity re-enforcing historical legacies. Devolution created new legal orders and challenged accepted traditional constitutional theory. The story is not yet over. 1. Introduction The establishment of The Open University (OU) in 1969 changed the landscape of higher education in the United Kingdom (UK). Its mission of being ‘Open to people, places, methods and ideas’1 and its promotion of social justice through high quality education2 has challenged thinking around educational practices. In the 50 years since it was established it has transformed the lives of many through its work and partnerships. It has students in over 90% of UK postcodes3 and continues to hold a unique position within the UK’s Higher Education sector working across, and receiving funding from, all four UK nations. In celebrating its 50th anniversary its Vice Chancellor expressed pride in being the UK’s only four nations university.4 During the OU’s 50-year history there have been significant changes and challenges within the higher education landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Law and Justice in Wales: Some Issues for the Next Assembly
    Law and Justice in Wales: Some Issues for the Next Assembly A report to the Minister for Public Services by the Justice Stakeholder Group March 2016 Foreword by the Chair i. Last year I was pleased to accept an invitation from the Minister for Public Services, Leighton Andrews AM, to convene and chair a Stakeholder Group to consider the justice sector in Wales. It is a crucial time for justice in Wales, with the effects of the UK Government’s far-reaching reforms of recent years being increasingly felt by people living, working and doing business in Wales. More substantial change is on the way, with current consultations on rationalising the court estate, digitising court services and reforming the civil courts structure, including proposals to launch an Online Court capable of operating without lawyers. These reforms are being developed during a period of further constitutional change, with a move to a reserved powers model of devolution for Wales and a developing debate about the need for Wales to become a legal jurisdiction distinct from England. ii. The Stakeholder Group has brought together academics and expert practitioners with extensive knowledge and experience of the justice sector and the legal profession in Wales. I would like to thank them for the valuable contributions they have made in our meetings since July 2015 and in bringing this report together. We have explored issues relating to the increasing divergence between the law of Wales and the law of England and considered current and future challenges facing the justice sector. iii. Our deliberations have focused on the practical implications for the delivery of justice in Wales of the growing body of Welsh law, proposed changes to the devolution settlement and UK Government reforms.
    [Show full text]
  • Programme for Government
    PROGRAMME FOR GOVERNMENT WELSH GOVERNMENT Programme for Government gov.wales 1 PROGRAMME FOR GOVERNMENT Foreword Today, I am proud to be publishing the Welsh Government’s Programme for the 6th Senedd. This Programme for Government is being published much earlier than has been the case in previous years as I want to demonstrate to the people of Wales that they can have absolute confidence that their government is moving quickly and purposefully to turn the commitments that we made during the election into Mark Drakeford MS prompt action. FIRST MINISTER OF WALES Our government programme sets out the ambitious and radical commitments we will deliver over the next five years in order to tackle the challenges that we face and improve the lives of people across Wales. It is founded on the distinctively Welsh values of community, equality and social justice. It puts collaboration ahead of competition, showing how we will act to maximise fairness for all and eliminate inequality at every level of society. People in Wales look after each other, and this programme is built on exactly that principle. The Programme for Government shows how we will help the NHS and social care providers to recover and move forward following the extraordinary challenges they have faced this year, investing in the frontline staff who have worked so hard and who have made us so proud. It outlines how we will work in social partnership to create new jobs in the industries of the future, and to transform our economy into one which is greener and fairer. The Programme shows how we will act decisively to tackle the climate and nature emergency so that people can go on treasuring Wales’ rich natural resources for generations to come.
    [Show full text]