Little Bitterns Breeding in South Yorkshire

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Little Bitterns Breeding in South Yorkshire Little Bitterns breeding in South Yorkshire Andrew M. Allport and David Carroll he Little Bittern Ixobrychus minutus occurs in Africa, Europe, Asia and TAustralia. It is a summer visitor to Europe, where it breeds locally throughout central, southern and eastern Europe, but is absent from Scandinavia and Britain and Ireland (Cramp & Simmons 1977). It is an accidental of almost annual occurrence in Britain and Ireland, with 140 records in the 27 years 1958-84, mainly in the south of England and East Anglia, with 70% of all spring vagrants being south of a line from The Wash to the mouth of the Severn. Individuals (including 'barking' males) and apparent pairs also summered during that time. Pairs were present in Somerset during June-August 1958 (Pyman 1960), in Huntingdonshire in June-July 1960 (Pyman 1961), and elsewhere in 1979 and 1980 (Sharrock et al. 1981, 1982), and males stayed for six weeks in Somerset in June-July 1970 (Smith et al. 1971) and perhaps from June to August in West Glamorgan in 1976 (O'Sullivan et al. 1977). Occasional breeding was strongly suspected in East Anglia in the nineteenth century and in Kent in 1947, and doubtfully occurred in Surrey in 1956 (Parslow 1973), but, until 442 [Brit. Birds 82:442-446, October 1989] Little Bitterns breeding in South Yorkshire 443 the events described in this paper, there was no definite record of breeding in Britain and Ireland. By 1977, there were only six records of Little Bitterns in Yorkshire this century. Four of these occurrences were in autumn, and one in winter; the sixth record concerned a male at Hornsea Mere from 29th May to 11th June 1977, and this was the last Yorkshire record prior to 1984 (Mather 1986). In view of past records, therefore, it was most unexpected that this species should first be proved breeding in northern England. In 1984, a pair of Little Bitterns arrived at Potteric Carr, a 140-ha nature reserve in South Yorkshire. From 11th June, when the male was discovered by R. P. Lambe and later seen by S. Boyes, the site was closely watched. By late July, successful breeding was confirmed. Study method Observations made by AMA, Yorkshire Wildlife Trust warden at the time, varied from three-quarters of an hour to six hours per day. This took place on 27 out of the 67 days on which the Little Bitterns were known to be present. The total of about 80 hours of watching provided most of the observations described in this paper. A number of other observers contributed details on the frequency of sightings, and records for those days when the warden was not in attendance. Nest site The nest site was well hidden, in the middle of a small, secluded area of common reed Phragmites australis standing in water approximately 30 cm deep. On one occasion, the male was seen carrying a reed stem. The nest was some 12 m from the edge of Low Ellers Marsh, which covers an area of 13 ha. Habitat surrounding the site includes mixed reed-fen, open water and willow-carr Salix. This is criss-crossed by drier areas, with some scrub- invaded railway embankments and areas of woodland, predominantly birch Betula. Observations The male was seen frequently in flight, often every half hour or so for the first few days. At this time, he inhabited many different areas of the reed- fen around the nest site, and occasionally visited adjoining areas of water and reedbed. He soon established a routine. From about 20th June onwards, he would most often be seen in the morning, flying 370 m from his regular feeding area alongside a ditch, to the reedbed nest site. Observations indicated that there was a fairly large population of common frogs Rana temporaria and common toads Bufo bufo in the surrounding marshes. The male Little Bittern was seen to take amphibians on several occasions, but smaller food items could not be identified. The female may have arrived with the male, but she was not seen until 15th June, and was much less frequently observed. Moreover, throughout late June and early July, the female was not seen for several days at a time. She was most often seen in the early morning and evening, but generally did not fly far from the nest site. Feeding often took place some 20-30 m 444 Little Bitterns breeding in South Yorkshire away from the nest. She was markedly more crepuscular and secretive in behaviour than the male. Both adult Little Bitterns were normally very quiet, and only on very few occasions were calls heard from either individual. On 17th June, the male was heard during late evening, uttering a bark-like croaking. This was heard intermittently for a period of 30 minutes while the bird remained concealed. The only other call made by the adults was when signalling the juveniles to be fed, and is described later. While it was difficult to establish unquestionable conclusions from the discontinuous observations and limited data collected, the following impression was formed from the frequency and timing of nest-site visits. It was evident that the majority of the incubation was carried out by the female. The male seemingly incubated the eggs only for relatively short periods; the activity of both parents indicated probable male incubating times from 30 minutes to three hours, and appeared to occur in the middle of the day or in the evening. From 9th July onwards, there was a considerable increase in sightings and nest-site visits by both adults. It is likely that this was the period when the juveniles were becoming increasingly demanding of the parents, as they rapidly developed. Indeed, juvenile begging calls could be heard on 18th July, and subsequently on most occasions when a parent bird approached. The male appeared to carry out most of the feeding of the young. Observations indicated that he fed the juveniles as many as ten times more frequently than the female in the early part of their development. The juveniles seemed not to foray from the nest for some time, and in fact were not seen near the edge of the nest-site reedbed until 26th July. At this stage, they were evidently still quite dependent on their parents, and retained varying amounts of down on crown, nape and mantle. By 26th July, the feeding rate had increased, with intervals between feeds varying from five to 30 minutes. Lulls occurred around midday/early afternoon, when two hours could elapse without any sign of feeding. Over the two weeks or so prior to their dispersal, feeding increasingly followed a predictable pattern. An adult would often settle on a dead branch out in the open, a few metres away from a juvenile. It would call, uttering a soft 'quer . quer', whereupon one or two of the young birds would fly to the adult while giving a raucous 'kraar . kraar', recalling a crow Corvus. Upon alighting, they flapped their wings vigorously, with underwing- coverts flashing white. One young would then grab hold of the adult's bill at its base, and pull downwards until food was regurgitated directly into the juvenile's throat. A number of interspecific encounters were noted during the Little Bitterns' stay. Virtually all involved the resident colony of Black-headed Gulls Lams ridibundus. Adult encounters were generally of an aggressive nature. When approached by a Black-headed Gull, and on one occasion by a Carrion Crow Corvus corone, the male Little Bittern's crown and mantle feathers were raised in threatening posture. When mobbed, he would strike upwards with his bill partially open. In comparison, on the Little Bitterns breeding in South Yorkshire 445 two known occasions when juveniles received this mobbing, they adopted a typical 'bittern-stance', with chest feathers ruffled and bill pointing skywards. In one instance, while exhibiting this 'concealment' posture, the juvenile was perched conspicuously on a dead branch in open water. As no specific observations supplied egg-laying or hatching dates, the incubation and fledging periods are conjectural. If we assume that the advertising calls of the male on 17th June were prior to the full clutch being laid, and that the juveniles fledged fully around 5th August, the periods of incubation and fledging would be consistent with recent literature. Cramp & Simmons (1977), for example, gave incubation at 17- 19 days, and fledging at 25-30 days. They also suggested that juveniles become independent at or soon after fledging. Observations at Potteric Carr showed, however, that the young were certainly dependent on the adults for several days after fledging. They continued to be fed by the parents until at least two days before their apparent dispersal from the area. At least three juveniles fledged, one of which was, when last seen, still significantly smaller than the other two. It had paler plumage and was less developed, with considerable amounts of down across the crown and nape. Some difference in rates of development are to be expected, of course, owing to asynchronous hatching. This smaller juvenile was last seen on 11th August, the day after the others had apparently dispersed. The last Little Bittern to be seen was the male, on 16th August. Possible difficulties in separating female and juvenile plumages may have contributed towards uncertainty about the exact number of young reared. This is obvious from records already published. Mather (1986) stated that three fledged juveniles were present, and this is the considered opinion of the finders and of AMA. Four young are claimed by some observers whose records appear in the 1984 ornithological reports of the Yorkshire Naturalists' Union and the Doncaster and District Ornithologi­ cal Society; Rhodes (1988) accepted the latter records of four young birds.
Recommended publications
  • South Yorkshire Green Infrastructure Strategy 2011
    © South Yorkshire Forest Partnership Forest © South Yorkshire Supported by: In partnership with THE SOUTH YORKSHIRE GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE STRATEGY Creating & Improving Our Green Network Contents 1 CONTENTS 2 Foreword 3 Executive Summary 4 1. Purpose of This Document 5 2. The Strategy Vision 13 3. Geographic Scope 17 4. Valuing Green Infrastructure 27 5. The Strategy Masterplan 33 6. Strategy Themes, Goals & Objectives 35 7. Potential Actions and Initiative Areas 49 8. Delivery Mechanisms 59 9. Securing Funding and Other Resources 67 10. Next Steps 72 11. Conclusions 74 12. Appendices 75 Appendix A: Sub-Regional Objectives Addressed by the Four Strategy Themes 80 Appendix B: Delivery Plan 80 Appendix C: Project Opportunities 82 Appendix D: Current Policy and Strategy 85 Appendix E: Natural England Fifteen Functions of GI 86 Appendix F: Area Assessment 91 Appendix G: Datasets Used in Scoping and Masterplanning 92 Appendix H: Definitions of GI 93 Appendix I: Acronyms 94 Appendix J: References To download a pdf copy of this document go to www.value-landscapes.eu South Yorkshire Forest Partnership Flora Parkin BA PGDipLA with Krys Craik BA MLA MRTPI CMLI and Tom Wild BSc MSc CBIOL MCIWEM Copyright South Yorkshire Forest Partnership March 2011 Acknowledgements This document has been prepared for Transform South Yorkshire, Yorkshire and Humber ERDF Competitiveness Programme 2007-2013 and the VALUE Interreg IVB project. The authors and steering group members wish to express their gratitude for this funding support. South Yorkshire Forest Partnership
    [Show full text]
  • River Torne Catchment 2019/20
    River Torne Catchment 2019/20 Jamie McEwan 2 | P a g e Executive summary A series of 'Aspirational projects' have been developed by the Torne Catchment partnership over a number of meetings. This document addresses the need to be able to summarise potential projects by their multiple benefits, costs and relevance to available funding. True to the Catchment based approach it allows us to work effectively together combining resources to progress projects from an idea and enable the effective delivery of WFD and multiple benefits for the catchment. Developed by the partnership this document provides a list of projects summarising the relative contributions each project makes towards WFD funding themes and the partnership aims. It also provides a more detailed overview for each project outlining the status, lead partner, management and location of each project alongside its relevance to the funding themes and estimated cost. Within project descriptions further detail can be found for project justification, next steps for progress, and context. Appended is a blank project template detailing how partners can go about putting forward a new idea to be considered as a project for the catchment. Through partnership review and reporting this becomes a live document and process to help support a shared vision, clarity of purpose and the ability of the partnership to act fast on relevant opportunities. Ultimately this document will be an effective way of allowing all members of the partnership to contribute toward the development of the catchment. A project idea from its beginning can be brought forward to the partnership and its progress tracked to completion eventually forming a portfolio for the Torne Catchment partnership as well as an active and aspirational document.
    [Show full text]
  • La Mancha, Coto Donana & Extremadura 2017
    Field Guides Tour Report Spain: La Mancha, Coto Donana & Extremadura 2017 May 6, 2017 to May 18, 2017 Chris Benesh & Godfried Schreur For our tour description, itinerary, past triplists, dates, fees, and more, please VISIT OUR TOUR PAGE. Spectacular skies greeted us during our visit to old Trujillo in the heart of Extremadura. Photo by guide Chris Benesh. So many birds around that you don´t know which to choose and observe. Do you recognize this feeling? We experienced many of these exciting moments in Spain during the Field Guides tour in May. It started straight away, on the first day, overlooking the natural lagoons of La Mancha Húmeda, where we had the chance to observe a great variety of species of ducks, grebes, terns, and passerines. The highlights here were the White-headed Duck, Eared Grebe, Red-crested Pochard, Whiskered Tern and Penduline Tit. In the National Park of Coto Donana again we found ourselves surrounded by birds: larks, bee-eaters, flamingos, Great Reed Warblers, Glossy Ibis, Squacco and Purple herons and a surprisingly well showing Little Bittern. With a bit of searching, scanning and listening we were able to also detect Red-knobbed Coot, Marbled Teal and Isabelline (Western Olivaceous) Warbler. Later in the week, close to Trujillo (Extremadura), we all enjoyed the excursion on the open, rolling plains, with Great and Little bustards, Eurasian Roller, Hoopoe, Calandra Lark, Montagu´s Harrier and many, many White Storks. For the shy Black Storks we had to wait one day more. In Monfrague National Park we discovered 3 pairs nesting on the breathtaking cliff of Peña Falcón.
    [Show full text]
  • The Doncaster Green Infrastructure Strategy 2014- 2028
    The Doncaster Green Infrastructure Strategy 2014- 2028 Creating a Greener, Healthier & more Attractive Borough Adoption Version April 2014 Doncaster Council Service Improvement & Policy (Regeneration & Environment) 0 1 the potential of the Limestone Valley, which runs through the west of the borough. Did you know that Doncaster has 65 different woodlands which cover an area in excess of 521 hectares? That’s about the equivalent to over 1,000 football pitches. There are 88 different formal open spaces across the borough, which include football, rugby and cricket pitches, greens, courts and athletics tracks. Doncaster is also home to 12 golf courses. The Trans-Pennine Trail passes through Doncaster and is integral to the extensive footpath and cycle network that link the borough’s communities with the countryside, jobs and recreation opportunities. There are so Foreword from the many more features across Doncaster and these are covered within this Strategy document. Portfolio Holder… Despite this enviable position that communities in Doncaster enjoy, there is always so much more that can be done to make the borough’s GI even greater. The Strategy sets out a framework As Portfolio Holder for Environment & Waste at for ensuring maximum investment and funding Doncaster Council, I am delighted to introduce is being channelled, both by the Council and the the Doncaster Green Infrastructure Strategy vast array of important partners who invest so 2014-2028: Creating a Greener, Healthier & much time and resources, often voluntarily, into more Attractive Borough. making our GI as good as it can be. As the largest metropolitan Borough in the This Strategy will help deliver a better country, covering over 220 square miles, connected network of multi-purpose spaces and Doncaster has an extensive green infrastructure provide the opportunity for the coordination (GI) network which includes numerous assets and delivery of environmental improvements and large areas that are rural in character.
    [Show full text]
  • Australasian Bittern (Botaurus Poiciloptilus) Western Australian Recovery Plan
    Australasian Bittern (Botaurus poiciloptilus) Western Australian Recovery Plan Wildlife Management Program No. 64 Western Australia Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions August 2018 Wildlife Management Program No. 64 Australasian Bittern (Botaurus poiciloptilus) Western Australian Recovery Plan August 2018 Western Australia Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, Western Australia 6983 Foreword Recovery plans are developed within the framework provided in Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions Corporate Policy Statement No. 35 (Parks and Wildlife, 2015c), and the Australian Government Department of the Environment and Energy Recovery Planning Compliance Checklist for Legislative and Process Requirements (DoE, 2014). Recovery plans outline the recovery actions that are needed to urgently address those threatening processes most affecting the ongoing survival of threatened taxa or ecological communities, and begin the recovery process. The attainment of objectives and the provision of funds necessary to implement actions are subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. This plan will operate for a 10 year period but will remain in force until withdrawn or replaced and will be reviewed at least at five year intervals. This recovery plan was approved by the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Western Australia. Approved recovery plans are subject
    [Show full text]
  • Ixobrychus Minutus (Common Little Bittern)
    Ixobrychus minutus (Common Little Bittern) European Red List of Birds Supplementary Material The European Union (EU27) Red List assessments were based principally on the official data reported by EU Member States to the European Commission under Article 12 of the Birds Directive in 2013-14. For the European Red List assessments, similar data were sourced from BirdLife Partners and other collaborating experts in other European countries and territories. For more information, see BirdLife International (2015). Contents Reported national population sizes and trends p. 2 Trend maps of reported national population data p. 4 Sources of reported national population data p. 6 Species factsheet bibliography p. 11 Recommended citation BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Further information http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/info/euroredlist http://www.birdlife.org/europe-and-central-asia/european-red-list-birds-0 http://www.iucnredlist.org/initiatives/europe http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/conservation/species/redlist/ Data requests and feedback To request access to these data in electronic format, provide new information, correct any errors or provide feedback, please email [email protected]. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Ixobrychus minutus (Common Little Bittern) Table 1. Reported national breeding population size and trends in Europe1. Country (or Population estimate Short-term population trend4 Long-term population trend4 Subspecific population (where relevant) 2 territory) Size (pairs)3 Europe (%) Year(s) Quality Direction5 Magnitude (%)6 Year(s) Quality Direction5 Magnitude (%)6 Year(s) Quality Albania 100-350 <1 2002-2012 medium 0 0 2002-2012 medium - 10-20 1980-2012 poor Armenia 1,500-2,000 2 2002-2012 medium ? ? Austria 180-270 <1 2001-2012 medium 0 0 2001-2012 medium ? I.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Risk Assessment of Cane Toads in Kakadu National Park Scientist Report 164, Supervising Scientist, Darwin NT
    supervising scientist 164 report A preliminary risk assessment of cane toads in Kakadu National Park RA van Dam, DJ Walden & GW Begg supervising scientist national centre for tropical wetland research This report has been prepared by staff of the Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist (eriss) as part of our commitment to the National Centre for Tropical Wetland Research Rick A van Dam Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, Locked Bag 2, Jabiru NT 0886, Australia (Present address: Sinclair Knight Merz, 100 Christie St, St Leonards NSW 2065, Australia) David J Walden Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, GPO Box 461, Darwin NT 0801, Australia George W Begg Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, GPO Box 461, Darwin NT 0801, Australia This report should be cited as follows: van Dam RA, Walden DJ & Begg GW 2002 A preliminary risk assessment of cane toads in Kakadu National Park Scientist Report 164, Supervising Scientist, Darwin NT The Supervising Scientist is part of Environment Australia, the environmental program of the Commonwealth Department of Environment and Heritage © Commonwealth of Australia 2002 Supervising Scientist Environment Australia GPO Box 461, Darwin NT 0801 Australia ISSN 1325-1554 ISBN 0 642 24370 0 This work is copyright Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Supervising Scientist Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of Marakele National Park
    BIRDS OF MARAKELE NATIONAL PARK English (Roberts 6) Old SA No. Rob No. English (Roberts 7) Global Names Names 1 1 Common Ostrich Ostrich 2 6 Great Crested Grebe Great Crested Grebe 3 8 Little Grebe Dabchick 4 50 Pinkbacked Pelican Pinkbacked Pelican 5 55 Whitebreasted Cormorant Whitebreasted Cormorant 6 58 Reed Cormorant Reed Cormorant 7 60 African Darter Darter 8 62 Grey Heron Grey Heron 9 63 Blackheaded Heron Blackheaded Heron 10 64 Goliath Heron Goliath Heron 11 65 Purple Heron Purple Heron 12 66 Great Egret Great White Egret 13 67 Little Egret Little Egret 14 68 Yellowbilled Egret Yellowbilled Egret 15 69 Black Heron Black Egret 16 71 Cattle Egret Cattle Egret 17 72 Squacco Heron Squacco Heron 18 74 Greenbacked Heron Greenbacked Heron 19 76 Blackcrowned Night-Heron Blackcrowned Night Heron 20 77 Whitebacked Night-Heron Whitebacked Night Heron 21 78 Little Bittern Little Bittern 22 79 Dwarf Bittern Dwarf Bittern 23 81 Hamerkop Hamerkop 24 83 White Stork White Stork 25 84 Black Stork Black Stork 26 85 Abdim's Stork Abdim's Stork 27 89 Marabou Stork Marabou Stork 28 90 Yellowbilled Stork Yellowbilled Stork 29 91 African Sacred Ibis Sacred Ibis 30 93 Glossy Ibis Glossy Ibis 31 94 Hadeda Ibis Hadeda Ibis 32 95 African Spoonbill African Spoonbill 33 96 Greater Flamingo Greater Flamingo 34 97 Lesser Flamingo Lesser Flamingo 35 99 Whitefaced Duck Whitefaced Duck 36 100 Fulvous Duck Fulvous Duck 37 101 Whitebacked Duck Whitebacked Duck 38 102 Egyptian Goose Egyptian Goose 39 103 South African Shelduck South African Shelduck 40 104 Yellowbilled
    [Show full text]
  • Catchment Management Plan the Environment Agency's Vision for the Rivers Idle and Torne Catchment Management Plan
    catchment management plan The Environment Agency's Vision for the Rivers Idle and Torne Catchment Management Plan he catchment of the Rivers Idle and Torne The key objectives of the plan are therefore to: T covers an area of 1 307 km2 within north Nottinghamshire and south Humberside and has • Establish a balance between the demands of a resident population of about 625,000 people. irrigation and abstraction and the needs of the environment. Man has impacted on the catchment since early times and the area has a rich industrial and • Ensure that the quality of minewater archaeological heritage. The heavily urbanised discharged to the rivers is of a and industrial headwaters contrast sharply with standard appropriate to the needs of the very flat, open and rural lower reaches nearer downstream users. to the confluences with the River Trent. Man's influence is also apparent here though where • Initiate and promote proposals for the drains have been cut and rivers re-routed and improvement of habitats for fisheries straightened to produce highly productive and conservation. agricultural areas. • Ensure that the standard of flood protection The catchment is predominantly rural with the is appropriate to the needs of the adjacent exception of the headwaters, as described above. land use, consistent with the vision. The River Idle and its tributaries flow through the heavily industrialised towns of Mansfield and The achievement of this vision is dependant on Worksop, then through the rolling forested areas the committed and enthusiastic cooperation of of Sherwood Forest and the Dukeries. The River others. Some objectives are common goals, while Torne rises on the edge of Doncaster and others may require a degree of compromise flows through the flat areas of low land, between differing demands on the resources of characterised by the Isle of Axholme, Thorne the catchment.
    [Show full text]
  • D4.2.1 Review of the Knowledge of the Target Species at the Selected
    ECOlogical observing System in the Adriatic Sea: oceanographic observations for biodiversity Priority Axis 3: Environment and cultural heritage Specific Objective 3.2: Contribute to protect and restore biodiversity D4.2.1 Review of the knowledge of the target species at the selected Natura 2000 sites WP4 – Establishing the Ecological Observing System in the Adriatic Sea (ECOAdS) A4.2 – Integration of ecological observing system with Natura 2000 target species PP5 Blue World Institute / Jure Miočić-Stošić, Grgur Pleslić Other involved partners: PP1, PP4, PP6, PP8 Final Public 29th June 2020 European Regional Development Fund www.italy-croatia.eu/ecoss Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 4 2. ALGAE .................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Fucus (Fucus virsoides) ........................................................................................................................ 7 3. PLANTS .................................................................................................................................................. 9 3.1 Virginia saltmarsh mallow (Kosteletzkya pentacarpos) ...................................................................... 9 3.2 Venice salicorne (Salicornia veneta) ................................................................................................. 10
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN BIRDS of CONSERVATION CONCERN Populations, Trends and National Responsibilities
    EUROPEAN BIRDS OF CONSERVATION CONCERN Populations, trends and national responsibilities COMPILED BY ANNA STANEVA AND IAN BURFIELD WITH SPONSORSHIP FROM CONTENTS Introduction 4 86 ITALY References 9 89 KOSOVO ALBANIA 10 92 LATVIA ANDORRA 14 95 LIECHTENSTEIN ARMENIA 16 97 LITHUANIA AUSTRIA 19 100 LUXEMBOURG AZERBAIJAN 22 102 MACEDONIA BELARUS 26 105 MALTA BELGIUM 29 107 MOLDOVA BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 32 110 MONTENEGRO BULGARIA 35 113 NETHERLANDS CROATIA 39 116 NORWAY CYPRUS 42 119 POLAND CZECH REPUBLIC 45 122 PORTUGAL DENMARK 48 125 ROMANIA ESTONIA 51 128 RUSSIA BirdLife Europe and Central Asia is a partnership of 48 national conservation organisations and a leader in bird conservation. Our unique local to global FAROE ISLANDS DENMARK 54 132 SERBIA approach enables us to deliver high impact and long term conservation for the beneit of nature and people. BirdLife Europe and Central Asia is one of FINLAND 56 135 SLOVAKIA the six regional secretariats that compose BirdLife International. Based in Brus- sels, it supports the European and Central Asian Partnership and is present FRANCE 60 138 SLOVENIA in 47 countries including all EU Member States. With more than 4,100 staf in Europe, two million members and tens of thousands of skilled volunteers, GEORGIA 64 141 SPAIN BirdLife Europe and Central Asia, together with its national partners, owns or manages more than 6,000 nature sites totaling 320,000 hectares. GERMANY 67 145 SWEDEN GIBRALTAR UNITED KINGDOM 71 148 SWITZERLAND GREECE 72 151 TURKEY GREENLAND DENMARK 76 155 UKRAINE HUNGARY 78 159 UNITED KINGDOM ICELAND 81 162 European population sizes and trends STICHTING BIRDLIFE EUROPE GRATEFULLY ACKNOWLEDGES FINANCIAL SUPPORT FROM THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: SECRETIVE MARSHBIRDS of URBAN WETLANDS in the WASHINGTON, DC METROPOLITAN AREA Patrice Nielson
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: SECRETIVE MARSHBIRDS OF URBAN WETLANDS IN THE WASHINGTON, DC METROPOLITAN AREA Patrice Nielson, Doctor of Philosophy 2016 Dissertation directed by: Dr. William Bowerman and Dr. Andrew Baldwin Environmental Science and Technology Secretive marshbirds are in decline across their range and are species of greatest conservation need in state Wildlife Action Plans. However, their secretive nature means there is relatively sparse information available on their ecology. There is demand for this information in the Washington, DC area for updating conservation plans and guiding wetland restoration. Rapid Wetland Assessment Methods are often used to monitor success of restoration but it is unknown how well they indicate marshbird habitat. Using the Standardized North American Marshbird Monitoring Protocol, I surveyed 51 points in 25 marshes in the DC area in 2013 – 2015. I also collected data on marsh area, buffer width, vegetation/water interspersion, vegetation characteristics, flooding, and invertebrates. At each bird survey point I assessed wetland quality using the Floristic Quality Assessment Index (FQAI) and California Rapid Wetland Assessment (CRAM) methods. I used Program Presence to model detection and occupancy probabilities of secretive marshbirds as a function of habitat variables. I found king rails (Rallus elegans) at five survey sites and least bittern (Ixobrychus exilis) at thirteen survey sites. Secretive marshbirds were using both restored and natural marshes, marshes with and without invasive plant species, and marshes with a variety of dominant vegetation species. King rail occupancy was positively correlated with plant diversity and invertebrate abundance and weakly negatively correlated with persistent vegetation. Least bittern occupancy was strongly negatively correlated woody vegetation and invertebrate abundance and weakly positively correlated with persistent vegetation.
    [Show full text]