DOCSLIB.ORG

Forest Health Conditions in Alaska—2008

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Forest Health Conditions in Alaska—2008 United States Department of Agriculture Forest Health Forest Service Alaska Region R10-PR-20 March 2009 Conditions in State of Alaska Department of Natural Resources Alaska—2008 Division of Forestry A Forest Health Protection Report Alaska Forest Health Specialists U.S. Forest Service, Forest Health Protection Alaska Forest Health Specialists U.S. Forest Service, Forest Health Protection http://www.fs.fed.us/r10/spf/fhp/ Steve Patterson, Assistant Director S&PF, Forest Health Protection Program Leader, Anchorage; [email protected] Anchorage, South-Central Field Office 3301 ‘C’ Street, Suite 202 • Anchorage, AK 99503-3956 Phone: (907) 743-9455 • Fax: 907) 743-9479 John Lundquist, Entomologist, [email protected], also Pacific Northwest Research Station Scientist Lori Trummer, Pathologist; [email protected]; Kenneth P. Zogas, Biological Science Technician; [email protected] Juneau, Southeast Field Office 2770 Sherwood Lane, Suite 2A • Juneau, AK 99801 Phone: (907) 586-8811 • Fax: (907) 586-7848 Paul E. Hennon, Pathologist; [email protected] also Pacific Northwest Research Station Scientist Melinda Lamb, Biological Science Technician; [email protected] ; Mark Schultz, Entomologist; [email protected] ; Dustin Wittwer, Aerial Survey/GIS; [email protected] Fairbanks, Interior Field Office 3700 Airport Way • Fairbanks,AK 99709 Phone: (907) 451-2701, (907) 451-2799, Fax: (907) 451-2690 Charles Frank, Entomologist (detail summer 2008); Jim Kruse, Entomologist; [email protected] Tricia L. Wurtz, Ecologist; [email protected] State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources Division of Forestry Central Office 550 W 7th Avenue, Suite 1450 • Anchorage, AK 99501 Phone: (907) 269-8460 • Fax: (907) 269-8931 Roger E. Burnside, Entomologist; [email protected] Hans Buchholdt, Cartographer/GIS Specialist; [email protected] Division of Agriculture 1648 S. Cushman Street, Suite 201 Fairbanks, AK 99701-6206 Phone: (907) 328-1950 • Fax: (907) 328-1951 Curtis Knight, Natural Resource Specialist; [email protected] University of Alaska Cooperative Extension Service 2221 E. Northern Lights, Suite 118 • Anchorage, AK 99508 Phone: (907) 786-6311 Michael Rasy, Statewide Integrated Pest Management Technician; [email protected] Corlene Rose, Integrated Pest Management Program Coordinator; [email protected] On the cover: Photo of the Bonasila River, west of the Yukon River, taken during the annual 2008 aerial survey. Forest Health Conditions in Alaska—2008 FHP Protection Report R10-PR20 Compiled by: Melinda Lamb and Tricia Wurtz Contributors: Hans Buchholdt, Roger Burnside, Charles Frank, Paul Hennon, Curtis Knight, Jim Kruse, Melinda Lamb, John Lundquist, Steve Patterson, Michael Rasy, Mark Schultz, Lori Trummer, Dustin Wittwer, Tricia Wurtz, Lori Zaumseil, and Ken Zogas U.S. Forest Service, Department of Agriculture. Alaska Region, Forest Health Protection Forest Health Conditions in Alaska—2008 R10-PR-20, 98 pp. April 2009 Table of Contents Introduction 1 Alaska Forest Health Highlights . 2 Focus of FHP Partnerships 9 Status of Insects 11 Insects—Weather and Climate . .13 Defoliators . 17 Birch Leaf Miners . .17 Aspen Leaf Miner . .19 Spruce Budworm . .21 Large Aspen Tortrix . .22 Willow Leaf Blotch Miner . .22 Spruce Aphid . 23 Black-headed Budworm . 24 Alder Defoliation . 24 Birch Leaf Roller . .25 Yellow-headed Spruce Sawfly . .25 Larch Mortality Due to Larch Sawfly and Eastern Larch Beetle . 25 Miscellaneous Defoliators . 26 Sunira Moth . 26 Spear-marked Black Moth . 26 Rusty Tussock Moth . 26 Others . 26 Bark Beetles . .27 Spruce Beetle . .27 Northern Spruce Engraver Beetle . 29 Western Balsam Bark Beetle . 29 Invasive Insects in Alaska . .29 Gypsy Moth and Exotic Forest Moth Detection Surveys . .29 Focus On Forest Health Protection Working with State, APHIS and others 31 European Yellow Underwing Moth . 32 Uglynest Caterpillar . 32 Rose Tortrix Moth . .33 Dalmation Toadflax Weevil . .33 Amethyst Cedar Borer . .33 Monitoring for Early Detection of Exotic Beetles and Wood Borers . 34 Wood Wasps . .35 Pinewood Nematode/White Spotted Sawyer Surveys . 35 Focus On: the Health of Alder in Alaska 37 Alder Canker Fungi 37 Alder Phytphthora 38 Insects of Alder 38 Status of Diseases and Declines 41 Alaska’s Forest Disease Management in the 21st Century . .43 Invasive Pathogens . .45 Stem Diseases . 48 Hemlock Dwarf Mistletoe . 48 iii Heart Rots of Conifers . .50 Stem Decay of Hardwoods . .52 Spruce Broom Rust . 53 Western Gall Rust . .53 Shoot Blights and Cankers . 54 Alder Canker Fungi . 54 Numerous Other Canker-Causing Fungi . 54 Sirococcus Shoot Blight . 55 Shoot Blight of Yellow-cedar . 56 Canker Fungi of Hardwoods . 57 Hemlock Canker . .57 Grovesiella Canker . 58 Root Diseases . 58 Tomentosus Root Disease . .58 Annosus Root & Butt Rot . 59 Armillaria Root Disease . 59 Foliar Diseases . 60 Spruce Needle Rust . 60 Spruce Needle Discoloration . 60 Declines . .61 Yellow-cedar Decline . 61 Western Hemlock Mortality . 65 Abiotic Agents and Animal Damage . .65 Hemlock Fluting . 66 Porcupine Feeding . 66 Status of Invasive Plants 67 Focus On: Cooperative Weed Management Areas in Alaska 69 Keeping Weeds Out of the Picture with the Anchorage CWMA 69 Weed and Pest Legislation Signed . 71 University of Alaska Fairbanks Partners with FHP to Document Campus Invasives . .72 Invasiveness Ranking System for Non-Native Plants of Alaska . 73 Collaboration with Canadian Invasive Plant Specialists . .73 A Citizen’s Guide to Identifying and Reporting Infestations in Alaska . 73 Invasive plants in Southcentral Alaska 2008 . 75 Bird Vetch . 75 Bull Thistle . 77 Canada Thistle . 77 Common Tansy . 78 Common Toadflax . 79 European Bird Cherry . .79 Canada Red Cherry . .79 Japanese Knotweed . 79 Meadow Hawkweed . 80 Mouseear Hawkweed . 80 Narrowleaf Hawkweed . 80 Orange Hawkweed . 81 Oxeye Daisy . .81 Ornamental Jewelweed . .81 Perennial Sowthistle . 81 Spiny Sowthistle . .81 Purple Loosestrife . .82 iv Rampion Bellflower . ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alnus P. Mill
    A Betulaceae—Birch family Alnus P. Mill. alder Constance A. Harrington, Leslie Chandler Brodie, Dean S. DeBell, and C. S. Schopmeyer Dr. Harrington and Ms. Brodie are foresters on the silviculture research team at the USDA Forest Service’s Pacific Northwest Research Station, Olympia,Washington; Dr. DeBell retired from the USDA Forest Service’s Pacific Northwest Research Station; Dr. Schopmeyer (deceased) was the technical coordinator of the previous manual Growth habit and occurrence. Alder—the genus (Tarrant and Trappe 1971). Alders also have been planted for Alnus—includes about 30 species of deciduous trees and wildlife food and cover (Liscinsky 1965) and for ornamental shrubs occurring in North America, Europe, and Asia and in use. European and red alders have been considered for use the Andes Mountains of Peru and Bolivia. Most alders are in biomass plantings for energy (Gillespie and Pope 1994) tolerant of moist sites and thus are commonly found along and are considered excellent firewood. In recent years, har­ streams, rivers, and lakes and on poorly drained soils; in vest and utilization of red alder has expanded greatly on the addition, some species occur on steep slopes and at high ele­ Pacific Coast of North America, where the species is used vations. The principal species found in North America are for paper products, pallets, plywood, paneling, furniture, listed in table 1. Many changes in the taxonomy of alder veneer, and cabinetry (Harrington 1984; Plank and Willits have been made over the years; in this summary, species are 1994). Red alder is also used as a fuel for smoking or curing referred to by their currently accepted names although in salmon and other seafood and its bark is used to make a red many cases the information was published originally under or orange dye (Pojar and MacKinnon 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • Alder Canopy Dieback and Damage in Western Oregon Riparian Ecosystems
    Alder Canopy Dieback and Damage in Western Oregon Riparian Ecosystems Sims, L., Goheen, E., Kanaskie, A., & Hansen, E. (2015). Alder canopy dieback and damage in western Oregon riparian ecosystems. Northwest Science, 89(1), 34-46. doi:10.3955/046.089.0103 10.3955/046.089.0103 Northwest Scientific Association Version of Record http://cdss.library.oregonstate.edu/sa-termsofuse Laura Sims,1, 2 Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, 1085 Cordley Hall, Corvallis, Oregon 97331 Ellen Goheen, USDA Forest Service, J. Herbert Stone Nursery, Central Point, Oregon 97502 Alan Kanaskie, Oregon Department of Forestry, 2600 State Street, Salem, Oregon 97310 and Everett Hansen, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, 1085 Cordley Hall, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331 Alder Canopy Dieback and Damage in Western Oregon Riparian Ecosystems Abstract We gathered baseline data to assess alder tree damage in western Oregon riparian ecosystems. We sought to determine if Phytophthora-type cankers found in Europe or the pathogen Phytophthora alni subsp. alni, which represent a major threat to alder forests in the Pacific Northwest, were present in the study area. Damage was evaluated in 88 transects; information was recorded on damage type (pathogen, insect or wound) and damage location. We evaluated 1445 red alder (Alnus rubra), 682 white alder (Alnus rhombifolia) and 181 thinleaf alder (Alnus incana spp. tenuifolia) trees. We tested the correlation between canopy dieback and canker symptoms because canopy dieback is an important symptom of Phytophthora disease of alder in Europe. We calculated the odds that alder canopy dieback was associated with Phytophthora-type cankers or other biotic cankers.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Native Plants for Bird-Friendly Landscapes What Are Native Plants? Why Go Native? Native Plants Are Those That Occur Naturally in an Area
    Michigan Native Plants for Bird-Friendly Landscapes What are native plants? Why go native? Native plants are those that occur naturally in an area. They are well-adapted to the climate and birds, insects, and Help baby birds Nearly all landbirds feed their chicks insect wildlife depend on native plants to survive. larva, but insects have a hard time eating and reproducing on non-native plants. Plant native plants and stay away from Invasive plants are those that are not native to an area and the pesticides—baby birds need those little pests to survive! aggressively outcompete native flora. These species degrade Michigan’s natural ecosystems and should be removed or Pollinators love natives, too Did you know that many avoided when planting new gardens. pollinators don’t or can’t use ornamental and non-native plants? Attract hummingbirds, butterflies, and honeybees by adding native flowering plants or better yet—select “host How to use this guide plants” that each species of butterfly and moth requires to reproduce. When thinking about bird habitat, it’s important to think in layers: from canopy trees to ground cover. Different bird Go local Michigan’s native plants are unique and beautiful, species rely on different layers to forage and nest. So, by but many are rare or threatened with extirpation. Keep providing a greater variety of layers in your yard, you can Michigan unique by planting a Michigan Garden! Bonus: attract a greater variety of birds. Many natives are drought tolerant and low maintenance. This guide separates each habitat layer and suggests several Healthy habitat for birds = Healthy yard for you Mowed native plants for each layer that are known to benefit birds.
    [Show full text]
  • Cook Inlet Region, Alaska
    Tertiarv Plants from the Cook Inlet Region, Alaska By JACK A. WOLFE 'TERTIARY BIOSTRATIGRAPHY OF THE COOK INLET REGION, ALASKA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 398-B Discussion floristic signzjcance and systematics of some fossil plants from the Chickaloon, Kenai, and Tsadaka Formations UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1966 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 55 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Abstract -__._--_.___-.-..--------..--.....-.-------Systematics__.___----.--------------------------.- _.- - -- - - -- -- - -- Introduction _ _ . .- . - -.-. -. - - - -.- -. - - - - - Chickaloon flora. _ ___ _ __ __ - _- -- -- Floristic and ecologic interpretation- _ - _ _ - - -.- -.- - - - - - - Kenaiflora_--______.___-_---------------------- Chickaloon flora__^^______--__--------. Salicaceae---______------------------------- Partial list of flora of the Chickaloon Formation- Juglandaceae_______------------------------ Kenaiflora__--___--.---------------.----------- Betulaceae_._._._-_.----------------------- Lower Kenai (Seldovian) flora-_--. - - --- - -- - - Menispermaceae_.-_.--__.-__-____--------- Systematic list of the Seldovia Point flora__ Rosaceae.___._.___--------.--------------- Middle Kenai (Homerian) flora _-_---- -- - -__- - Leguminosae_____.__._____-_--_--------- Systematic list of the Homerian flora from Aceraceae-_-______.--.-..------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of Rosids! ! Rosids! !
    Phylogeny of Rosids! Rosids! ! ! ! ! Eurosids I Eurosids II Vitaceae Saxifragales Eurosids I:! Eurosids II:! Zygophyllales! Brassicales! Celastrales! Malvales! Malpighiales! Sapindales! Oxalidales! Myrtales! Fabales! Geraniales! Rosales! Cucurbitales! Fagales! After Jansen et al., 2007, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 19369-19374! Phylogeny of Rosids! Rosids! ! ! ! ! Eurosids I Eurosids II Vitaceae Saxifragales Eurosids I:! Eurosids II:! Zygophyllales! Brassicales! Celastrales! Malvales! Malpighiales! Sapindales! Oxalidales! Myrtales! Fabales! Geraniales! Rosales! Cucurbitales! Fagales! After Jansen et al., 2007, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 19369-19374! Alnus - alders A. rubra A. rhombifolia A. incana ssp. tenuifolia Alnus - alders Nitrogen fixation - symbiotic with the nitrogen fixing bacteria Frankia Alnus rubra - red alder Alnus rhombifolia - white alder Alnus incana ssp. tenuifolia - thinleaf alder Corylus cornuta - beaked hazel Carpinus caroliniana - American hornbeam Ostrya virginiana - eastern hophornbeam Phylogeny of Rosids! Rosids! ! ! ! ! Eurosids I Eurosids II Vitaceae Saxifragales Eurosids I:! Eurosids II:! Zygophyllales! Brassicales! Celastrales! Malvales! Malpighiales! Sapindales! Oxalidales! Myrtales! Fabales! Geraniales! Rosales! Cucurbitales! Fagales! After Jansen et al., 2007, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 19369-19374! Fagaceae (Beech or Oak family) ! Fagaceae - 9 genera/900 species.! Trees or shrubs, mostly northern hemisphere, temperate region ! Leaves simple, alternate; often lobed, entire or serrate, deciduous
    [Show full text]
  • Alnus Incana
    Alnus incana Alnus incana in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats T. Houston Durrant, D. de Rigo, G. Caudullo The grey alder (Alnus incana (L.) Moench) is a relatively small short-lived deciduous tree that can be found across the Northern Hemisphere. Normally associated with riparian areas, it is extremely frost tolerant and can be found up to the treeline in parts of northern Europe. Like the common alder (Alnus glutinosa), it is a fast-growing pioneer and it is also able to fix nitrogen in symbiotic root nodules, making it useful for improving soil condition and for reclaiming derelict or polluted land. Alnus incana (L.) Moench, or grey alder, is a short lived, small to medium sized deciduous tree. It lives for around 60 Frequency years1 and can reach a height of around 24 m2 but often also < 25% 25% - 50% 3 occurs as a multi-stemmed shrub . It is generally smaller than 50% - 75% the common alder (Alnus glutinosa)1. The bark is smooth and > 75% Chorology 2, 4 deep grey, developing fissures with age . The leaves are oval to Native oval-lanceolate and deeply toothed with pointed tips, matt green above and grey and downy underneath2. It is a monoecious and wind pollinated species5. It flowers from late February to May before the leaves open. The yellow male catkins are 5-10 cm long and occur in clusters of three or four, while the female catkins are woody and resemble small cones 1-2 cm long, growing in Green cones grouped in 3-4 in each stem.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guide to the Plant Community Types of Voyageurs National Park
    36 A7 Northern Sedge Poor Fen Carex lasiocarpa - C. oligosperma / Sphagnum spp. - Polytrichum spp. Herbaceous vegetation WETLAND TYPES 11 System 23 22 BG PS PF RF RS WM 21 10 9 7 8 14 xis 2 A 5 19 13 18 12 17 16 15 4 6 3 2 1 Axis 1 Description This community is dominated by 80–100% cover of Carex lasiocarpa (wire-sedge). Short, stunted tamarack trees, usually under 2 m tall, are present above the herb layer at <10% cover. Dwarf-shrubs, most commonly Chamaedaphne calyculata (leatherleaf) and Andromeda glaucophylla (bog-rosemary), may be present at <40% cover and, in wetter stands, occupy only the drier hummocks. The shrubs Kalmia polifolia (bog laurel), Betula glandulifera (bog- birch), and Vaccinium oxyccocus (small cranberry) may also be present at low density. In addition to Carex lasiocarpa (wire-sedge), other common herbs include Menyanthes trifolia (buckbean), Equisetum fluviatile(water horsetail), Drosera rotundifolia (round-leaved sundew), and Sarricenia purpurea (pitcher-plant). Stands of this type occurring in water tracks tend to be more mineral rich and may also contain Pogonia ophioglosoides, Carex limosa, and Utricularia intermedia. Sphagnum typically forms a continuous carpet, though in wetter stands may be intermixed with brown mosses. The most abundant species are Sphagnum megellanicum, S. angustifolium, S. subsecundum sensu lato, and Warnstorfii exanulata. The Northern Sedge Poor Fen occurs in and around water tracks of large peatlands. In the wetter, more minerotrophic phase, microtopography consists of wet hollows with scattered hummocks. In the drier phase, hummock and hollow microtopography is more well developed. The substrate is deep, fibric Sphagnum peat.
    [Show full text]
  • European Black Alder Specimens Can Be Found on the UMN St
    MN NWAC Risk Common Name Latin Name (Full USDA Nomenclature) Assessment Worksheet (04-2017) European alder, black alder, or common Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn. alder Original Reviewer: Affiliation/Organization: Original Review: David Hanson Minnesota Department of Transportation 08/22/2018 David Hanson Minnesota Department of Transportation 08/20/2019 Species Description: • Planted as a landscape tree or for site restorations. Indications from neighboring states and Hennepin County, MN suggest invasive potential into natural areas. • Member of the family Betulaceae (birches). Considered a pioneer species which indicates potential to colonize disturbed sites. • Form is typically narrow, upright, pyramidal. Potential for trees to reach 80 feet tall in native range, less in North America. • Foliage is alternate and simple. Leaf margin is described as doubly toothed and the tip of leaf blade is rounded or notched (indented) while the base is wedge shaped. Overall leaf shape is oval to orbicular with typical measurements of 2-4 inches long by 2-3 inches wide. Dark green above, lighter below. Individual leaves have 5-6 veins either side of mid-vein. • Flowers, while not colorful, do provide seasonal interest. Male flowers are a slender 1-1½ long catkin present through winter months. Female flowers are small, clustered near branch tips that develop into ¾ inch long woody cones. Female cones persist through winter shedding many winged nutlets • Twigs are green when young and developing a brownish color with stalked, purplish-brown, 3-angled buds. • Bark is initially smooth with prominent lenticels breaking into small blocks with maturity. (Seiler et al. 2018). Maps and additional identification images in Appendix.
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Differences in Foraging Behaviour in the Lesser Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos Minor
    Sexual differences in foraging behaviour in the Lesser Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos minor Olav Hogstad Hogstad, O. 2010. Sexual differences in foraging behaviour in the Lesser Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos minor. – Ornis Norvegica 33: 135-146. Sexual differences in foraging behaviour in the nearly monomorphic Lesser Spotted Woodpecker (Dendrocopos minor) were studied from 1972 to 2007 in a subalpine woodland in central Norway. Data from different years were pooled and analysed on a seasonal basis: winter (November–February), prebreeding (March–April), breed- ing (May–June) and autumn (September–October). The predominant foraging substrates were in birch Betula odorata (42 % of 460 foraging observations) and grey alder Alnus incana (44 %). No sexual difference was found in use of dead snags, dying broken trees or live trees, for the four periods separately or combined. Both sexes foraged entirely on dead substrates in winter but with the winter period excluded, females foraged more in live trees and less in snags and broken trees than males. The sexes did not differ in use of tree species, except during the winter when females foraged more in birch (73 %) and less in grey alder (22 %) than males (51 % and 49 %, respectively). Females foraged in higher live trees of birch (average height 3.8 m) and grey alder (4.3 m) than males (3.4 m and 3.7 m, respectively) and used substrates with a smaller mean diameter (females: 4.6 cm; males: 5.9 cm). The sexes differed in foraging techniques in each of the periods: males used bark-scaling and pecking more than females in all periods, whereas females used more probing than males during the winter and prebreeding periods and more gleaning (picking in the surface of trunks or branches) outside the winter than males.
    [Show full text]
  • Alnus Incana (L.) Moench to Be More Widely Grown in Gardens and Nurseries
    it useful in rehabilitation of disturbed sites, including SPECKLED ALDER old mines. Alders are beautiful and functional plants and deserve Alnus incana (L.) Moench to be more widely grown in gardens and nurseries. ssp. rugosa They are fast growing and can easily be trained to a (Du Roi) Clausen tree-like form by removing lower branches. plant symbol = ALINR Wildlife: Speckled alder thickets provide cover for moose, white-tailed deer, rabbits, and others. Moose, muskrats, beavers, and rabbits browse the twigs and foliage. Songbirds, including redpolls, goldfinches, woodcock, and grouse eat the seeds, buds, and catkins. Beavers build dams and lodges with speckled alder. Ethnobotanic: Native Americans used speckled alder to treat anemia, as an emetic, a compress or wash for sore eyes, and a diaphoretic, for internal bleeding, urinary problems, sprains, bruises or backaches, itches, flux, and piles, to cure saddle gall in horses. When mixed with powdered bumblebees, it was used as an aid for difficult labor. Tea was made from alder to cure diarrhea and toothaches. Other bark mixtures were applied to rashes, eyes, and swelling. Chippewa Indians mixed alder root scraping with grounded up bumblebee and fed the mixture to women whom were having difficulty during childbirth. Erosion Control: Speckled alder’s acceptance of a wide variety of soil types makes it a good choice for disturbed site rehabilitation. This is a valuable species to plant along stream banks for erosion USDI, GS, BRD, Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center control. Contributed By: USDA, NRCS, National Plant Data Status Center and the Biota of North America Program Please consult the PLANTS Web site and your State Department of Natural Resources for this plant’s Alternate Names current status, such as state noxious status and Tag alder, gray alder, hoary alder, hazel alder, swamp wetland indicator values.
    [Show full text]
  • NWF GFW Plant List Ecoregion7.Indd
    Keystone Native Plants Marine West Coast Forest - Ecoregion 7 Native plants have tight relationships with wildlife, formed over many thousands of years, providing natural sources Keystone plants are native plants critical to the food web and of food, cover and places to raise young. Without healthy necessary for many wildlife species to complete their life cycle. Without keystone plants in the landscape, butterflies, native native plant communities, wildlife cannot survive. Every bees, and birds will not thrive. 96% of our terrestrial birds ecoregion has different native plant communities. rely on insects supported by keystone plants. There are two types of keystone plants: Host plants that feed the young caterpillars of approximately 90% of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera). Plants that feed specialist bees who only eat pollen from specific plants. Keystone plants for native bees feed both specialist and generalist bees. Entomologist Dr. Doug Tallamy, and his University of Delaware research team have identified the keystone plants that support butterfly and moth species. Native host plants of pollen specialist bees were researched by pollinator conservationist Jarrod Fowler. Top Keystone Plant Genera in Marine West Coast Forest - Ecoregion 7 A genus is a taxonomic category of plants that contains one or more species of plants with similar characteristics. Species within each genus have adapted to local conditions and are the appropriate native species or varieties suited to a specific ecoregion. Plant Type Plant Genus Sample of Common
    [Show full text]
  • The Phenological Phases of Flowering and Pollen Seasons of Spring
    Acta Agrobotanica DOI: 10.5586/aa.1678 INVITED ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPER Publication history Received: 2016-03-31 Accepted: 2016-05-24 The phenological phases of flowering and Published: 2016-06-30 pollen seasons of spring flowering tree taxa Handling editor Agnieszka Grinn-Gofroń, Faculty of Biology, University of against a background of meteorological Szczecin, Poland conditions in Kraków, Poland Authors’ contributions DS: research planning, phenological observations, 1 2 3 results interpretation, Danuta Stępalska , Dorota Myszkowska *, Katarzyna Piotrowicz , manuscript preparation, Idalia Kasprzyk4 corrections according to 1 Institute of Botany, Jagiellonian University, Kopernika 27, 31-531 Kraków, Poland reviews; DM: phenological 2 Department of Clinical and Environmental Allergology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, observations, pollen data Śniadeckich 10, 31-531 Kraków, Poland collection, results interpretation 3 Institute of Geography and Spatial Management, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 7, 30- and manuscript preparation; 387 Kraków, Poland KP: meteorological data 4 Department of Environmental Biology, University of Rzeszów, Ćwiklińskiej 2, 35-601 Rzeszów, collection, results interpretation Poland and manuscript preparation, statistical analyses; IK: results * Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] preparation and discussion, manuscript preparation Funding Abstract This research project No. The aim of the study was to compare phenological observations of pollen seasons NN305 321936 was financially of selected early spring trees. Special attention was paid to meteorological condi- supported by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher tions which favored or did not favor tree flowering and pollen release. For this Education. reason, we used phenological observation, pollen counts, and meteorological data in five sites in the center of Kraków in the period 2009–2011.
    [Show full text]