DOCSLIB.ORG

EPA Registered Hard Surface Disinfectants Comparison Chart

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EPA Registered Hard Surface Disinfectants Comparison Chart EPA Registered Hard Surface Disinfectants Comparison Chart Active Bleach- Sodium Phenols Quaternary Accelerated Botanicals Silver Dihydrogen Ingredient Hypochlorite Ammonium Hydrogen Peroxide Example- Citrate in 5.25% (bleach Compounds (hydrogen peroxide Benefect – Thymol Example - Institutional concentrate) /anionic PureGreen 24 Disinfectant surfactants) Products Product • EPA registered • Ready-to-use. • Range of • Hydrogen • Plant based • Combination Description chlorine bleach • Usually an products that peroxide in products with of citric acid at a 5.25% aerosol use “quats” as synergy with a natural and a minute dilution. (Use product. the active blend of disinfecting amount of only EPA • Warning – not ingredients. commonly used characteristics. silver ions. registered intended for ingredients. products for use as an air disinfecting freshener. purposes.) CDC • Intermediate • Some are • Low Level • Product Specific • Intermediate • Low Level Disinfection Level intermediate Disinfectant • Low or Level Disinfectant Level Disinfectant some are low Intermediate Disinfectant level - noted Level on label. Disinfectant EPA Toxicity • Category I • Category I or • Category III • Category III or • Category IV • Category IV Category II IV, product See Chart specific. Below Pre-cleaning • Surfaces must • Surfaces must • Product • Registered as • Surfaces must be • Surfaces must Needed be pre-cleaned.1 be pre- specific. Some one-step pre-cleaned be pre-cleaned • Best practices cleaned.2 products disinfectant according to label according to advise pre- • Best practices registered as cleaners. instructions. label cleaning all advise pre- one-step • Best practices • Best practices instructions. surfaces before cleaning all disinfectant advise pre- advise pre- • Best practices disinfecting. surfaces before cleaners. cleaning all cleaning all advise pre- disinfecting. • Best practices surfaces before surfaces before cleaning all advise pre- disinfecting. disinfecting. surfaces before cleaning all disinfecting. surfaces before disinfecting. 1 Active Bleach- Sodium Phenols Quaternary Accelerated Botanicals Silver Dihydrogen Ingredient Hypochlorite Ammonium Hydrogen Peroxide Example- Citrate in 5.25% (bleach Compounds (hydrogen peroxide Benefect – Thymol Example - Institutional concentrate) /anionic PureGreen 24 Disinfectant surfactants) Products Storage • If used for • Stable in • Stable in • Stable in storage. • Stable in storage. • Stable in disinfecting storage. storage. 2 year shelf life. 2 year shelf life. storage. No purposes, • Flammable if expiration date bleach should in aerosol required. not be stored form.4 longer than 3 months. When mixed with water the solution is only effective as a disinfectant for 24 hours.3 Effectiveness • Effective • Read product • Generally • Effective against • Effective against • Effective against most label for effective against a broad spectrum a broad spectrum against a broad bacteria and effectiveness a broad of microbes of microbes spectrum of some viruses against spectrum of including H1N1 including H1N1 microbes and is registered specific microbes (Influenza A), (Influenza A). TB including as effective microbes. including norovirus and and MRSA. MRSA, against HIV, MRSA and MRSA. • Read product norovirus and HBV, H1N1 H1N1 • Read product label. H1N1 (Influenza A), (Influenza A), label for specific (Influenza A). MRSA and but typically not claims including • Read product TB.5 proven effective TB. label. • See notes below against spores. • Read product label for effectiveness against TB. Dwell Time • 5-10 minute • Generally 10 • Generally 10 • 1 - 10 minute • 10 minute dwell • 30 second to dwell time. minute dwell minute dwell dwell time. time. 10 minute • (Read the label time. time. • (Read the label • (Read the label dwell time. for specific • (Read the label • (Read the label for specific for specific • (Read the label 2 Active Bleach- Sodium Phenols Quaternary Accelerated Botanicals Silver Dihydrogen Ingredient Hypochlorite Ammonium Hydrogen Peroxide Example- Citrate in 5.25% (bleach Compounds (hydrogen peroxide Benefect – Thymol Example - Institutional concentrate) /anionic PureGreen 24 Disinfectant surfactants) Products recommended for specific for specific recommended recommended for specific dwell times.) recommended recommended dwell times.) dwell times.) recommended dwell times.) dwell times.) dwell times.) Health Effects • Mixing with • Phenols are • Can cause • Some products • No warning or • No warning or ammonia, recognized contact using this first aid first aid state- ammonium carcinogens dermatitis and technology have statements are ments are quaternary (CA Prop. 65), nasal been third-party required on the required on the compounds and suspected irritation.12 certified by material safety label. other acidic cardiovascular, Ammonium EcoLogo to meet data sheet. products can developmental quaternary environmental • The botanical oils create neurological, compounds and human in the product are poisonous gas.6 reproductive, including health criteria. either F.D.A • Corrosive to respiratory, benzalkonium (EPA does not (Food and Drug eyes and skin, skin and sense chloride, allow eco labels Administration) and a organ dodecyl- on disinfectants.) approved as Food respiratory toxicant.9 dimenthyl- Additives or on irritant.7 • Corrosive to benzyl the United States • Suspected eyes and ammonium G.R.A.S. cardiovascular, skin.10 chloride and (Generally gastrointestinal • Absorbed lauryl dimethyl Recognized as or liver, kidney, through the benzyl Safe) list. central nervous skin and by ammonium • Third-party system, inhalation.11 chloride are certified by respiratory, and respiratory EcoLogo to meet skin or sense sensitizers, and environmental organ toxicant.8 are associated and human health with asthma.13 criteria. (EPA does not allow eco labels on disinfectants.) Exposure • Personal • Requires • Requires • No special • No special • No special 3 Active Bleach- Sodium Phenols Quaternary Accelerated Botanicals Silver Dihydrogen Ingredient Hypochlorite Ammonium Hydrogen Peroxide Example- Citrate in 5.25% (bleach Compounds (hydrogen peroxide Benefect – Thymol Example - Institutional concentrate) /anionic PureGreen 24 Disinfectant surfactants) Products Controls protection personal personal requirements. requirements. requirements. equipment protection protection • Regular • Regular • Regular and/or increased equipment and equipment and ventilation is ventilation is ventilation is ventilation increased proper adequate. adequate. adequate. 15 should be ventilation. ventilation. • See notes below. • See notes below. • See notes used.14 • See notes • See notes below. • See notes below. below. below. Environ- • Toxic to aquatic • Toxic to • Very toxic to • Some products • Third-party • Listed on the mental Issues organisms.16 aquatic aquatic life.19 using this certified by Grassroots Pros and organisms.17 Also see technology have EcoLogo to meet Environmental Cons • Considered a Material Safety been third-party environmental Education’s persistent bio Data Sheet. certified by and human health ChildSafe accumulative • Associated with EcoLogo to meet criteria. (EPA Products List. toxin by antimicrobial environmental does not allow See EPA.18 resistance.20 and human eco labels on http://www.the • Disposal health criteria. disinfectants.) childsafeschool restrictions in (EPA does not .org/pdf/CSGre some states. allow eco labels v308.pdf for Check state on disinfectants.) inclusion and local criteria. regulations. Additional • May damage • Not for use on • Thorough • Rinsing is • Not yet widely • Not yet widely Dis- floor finishes, food or food rinsing required. required where available through available advantages carpets, clothing utensils.23 See product direct skin or vendors, may through and other fibers • May damage label for oral contact can need to be vendors, may when used in floor finishes specifics. occur (children’s ordered. need to be higher and other toys). • Strong odour. ordered. concentrations. surfaces. • Has an • Caution: Do 4 Active Bleach- Sodium Phenols Quaternary Accelerated Botanicals Silver Dihydrogen Ingredient Hypochlorite Ammonium Hydrogen Peroxide Example- Citrate in 5.25% (bleach Compounds (hydrogen peroxide Benefect – Thymol Example - Institutional concentrate) /anionic PureGreen 24 Disinfectant surfactants) Products unpleasant odor. not use around • Must be stored babies and separately from small ammonia and children.24 flammable • Generally products.21 leaves a • Rinsing is residue so required in rinsing is applications required. where direct skin or oral contact can occur (children’s toys).22 Advantages • Inexpensive. • Readily • Readily • Readily • Non-corrosive. • No rinsing • Easy to available. available. available. • No rinsing or required. purchase. • Non-corrosive in wiping required. • Non- • The same product diluted form. • Approved by the corrosive. can be used for • No rinsing Canadian Food • Odourless. routine and required except Inspection • EPA registered special event as above. Agency for use in for use on toys. tasks, by • Some products Food Processing. • 24 hour changing the are odourless. • Suitable for use residual concentration. on children’s protection. toys. *Notes: 1. Pre-Cleaning - Except for disinfectant cleaners that are tested to disinfect in the presence of 5% of organic matter, all other disinfectants require pre-cleaning. Best practices recommend cleaning first and then disinfecting for optimal efficiency. 5 2. Dwell Time – is product specific.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chemical Disinfectants for Biohazardous Materials (3/21)
    Safe Operating Procedure (Revised 3/21) CHEMICAL DISINFECTANTS FOR BIOHAZARDOUS MATERIALS ____________________________________________________________________________ Chemicals used for biohazardous decontamination are called sterilizers, disinfectants, sanitizers, antiseptics and germicides. These terms are sometimes equivalent, but not always, but for the purposes of this document all the chemicals described herein are disinfectants. The efficacy of every disinfectant is based on several factors: 1) organic load (the amount of dirt and other contaminants on the surface), 2) microbial load, 3) type of organism, 4) condition of surfaces to be disinfected (i.e., porous or nonporous), and 5) disinfectant concentration, pH, temperature, contact time and environmental humidity. These factors determine if the disinfectant is considered a high, intermediate or low-level disinfectant, in that order. Prior to selecting a specific disinfectant, consider the relative resistance of microorganisms. The following table provides information regarding chemical disinfectant resistance of various biological agents. Microbial Resistance to Chemical Disinfectants: Type of Microbe Examples Resistant Bovine spongiform encephalopathy (Mad Prions Cow) Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease Bacillus subtilis; Clostridium sporogenes, Bacterial Spores Clostridioides difficile Mycobacterium bovis, M. terrae, and other Mycobacteria Nontuberculous mycobacterium Poliovirus; Coxsackievirus; Rhinovirus; Non-enveloped or Small Viruses Adenovirus Trichophyton spp.; Cryptococcus sp.;
    [Show full text]
  • Decontamination of Rooms, Medical Equipment and Ambulances Using an Aerosol of Hydrogen Peroxide Disinfectant B.M
    Journal of Hospital Infection (2006) 62, 149–155 www.elsevierhealth.com/journals/jhin Decontamination of rooms, medical equipment and ambulances using an aerosol of hydrogen peroxide disinfectant B.M. Andersena,*, M. Rascha, K. Hochlina, F.-H. Jensenb, P. Wismarc, J.-E. Fredriksend aDepartment of Hospital Infection, Ulleva˚l University Hospital, Oslo, Norway bDivision of Pre-hospital Care, Ulleva˚l University Hospital, Oslo, Norway cDepartment of Medical Equipment, Ulleva˚l University Hospital, Oslo, Norway dHealth and Environment AS, Oslo, Norway Received 17 November 2004; accepted 1 July 2005 KEYWORDS Summary A programmable device (Sterinis, Gloster Sante Europe) Room decontamina- providing a dry fume of 5% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) disinfectant was tion; Ambulance tested for decontamination of rooms, ambulances and different types of decontamination; medical equipment. Pre-set concentrations were used according to the Medical equipment decontamination; volumes of the rooms and garages. Three cycles were performed with Hydrogen peroxide increasing contact times. Repetitive experiments were performed using fume decontamina- Bacillus atrophaeus (formerly Bacillus subtilis) Raven 1162282 spores to tion; Spore test control the effect of decontamination; after a sampling plan, spore strips were placed in various positions in rooms, ambulances, and inside and outside the items of medical equipment. Decontamination was effective in 87% of 146 spore tests in closed test rooms and in 100% of 48 tests in a surgical department when using three cycles. One or two cycles had no effect. The sporicidal effect on internal parts of the medical equipment was only 62.3% (220 tests). When the devices were run and ventilated during decontamination, 100% (57/57) of spore strips placed inside were decontaminated.
    [Show full text]
  • Ammonia As a Refrigerant
    1791 Tullie Circle, NE. Atlanta, Georgia 30329-2305, USA www.ashrae.org ASHRAE Position Document on Ammonia as a Refrigerant Approved by ASHRAE Board of Directors February 1, 2017 Expires February 1, 2020 ASHRAE S H A P I N G T O M O R R O W ’ S B U I L T E N V I R O N M E N T T O D A Y © 2017 ASHRAE (www.ashrae.org). For personal use only. Additional reproduction, distribution, or transmission in either print or digital form is not permitted without ASHRAE’s prior written permission. COMMITTEE ROSTER The ASHRAE Position Document on “Ammonia as a Refrigerant” was developed by the Society’s Refrigeration Committee. Position Document Committee formed on January 8, 2016 with Dave Rule as its chair. Dave Rule, Chair Georgi Kazachki IIAR Dayton Phoenix Group Alexandria, VA, USA Dayton, OH, USA Ray Cole Richard Royal Axiom Engineers, Inc. Walmart Monterey, CA, USA Bentonville, Arkansas, USA Dan Dettmers Greg Scrivener IRC, University of Wisconsin Cold Dynamics Madison, WI, USA Meadow Lake, SK, Canada Derek Hamilton Azane Inc. San Francisco, CA, USA Other contributors: M. Kent Anderson Caleb Nelson Consultant Azane, Inc. Bethesda, MD, USA Missoula, MT, USA Cognizant Committees The chairperson of Refrigerant Committee also served as ex-officio members: Karim Amrane REF Committee AHRI Bethesda, MD, USA i © 2017 ASHRAE (www.ashrae.org). For personal use only. Additional reproduction, distribution, or transmission in either print or digital form is not permitted without ASHRAE’s prior written permission. HISTORY of REVISION / REAFFIRMATION / WITHDRAWAL
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Disinfectants for Use Against the COVID-19 Virus
    When it comes to choosing a disinfectant to combat the COVID-19 virus, research and health authorities suggest not all disinfectants are equally effective. The difference is in their active ingredient(s). HEALTH CANADA AND U.S. EPA ASSESSMENTS The work to evaluate disinfectants perhaps best starts with lists of approved disinfectants compiled by government health authorities. Health Canada has compiled a list of 85 hard surface disinfectant products (as of March 20, 2020) that meet their requirements for disinfection of emerging pathogens, including the virus that causes COVID-19. It can be accessed here. You can wade through the entire list. But if you locate the Drug Identification Number (DIN) on the disinfectant product label or the safety data sheet (SDS), then you can use the search function to quickly see if the product meets Health Canada requirements. A second list, updated on March 19, 2020, provides 287 products that meet the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) criteria for use against SARS-CoV-2, the novel coronavirus that causes the disease COVID-19. This list can be found here. Like the Health Canada list, you can wade through this one too. However, to best use this list, you should locate the U.S. EPA registration number on the product label or SDS, and use that number to search the list. The U.S. EPA registration number of a product consists of two sets of numbers separated by a hyphen. The first set of numbers refers to the company identification number, and the second set of numbers following the hyphen represents the product number.
    [Show full text]
  • Preparing to Manufacture Hydrogen Peroxide
    PREPARING TO MANUFACTURE HYDROGEN PEROXIDE Part of the Hydrogen Peroxide Propulsion Guide The early laboratory preparation of hydrogen peroxide was based on the technique that Thenard used during the initial preparation of hydrogen peroxide. In this technique, barium nitrate, purified by recrystallization, was decomposed by heating in air in a porcelain retort. The resulting oxide was further oxidized by heating in a stream of oxygen to a dull red heat. The barium peroxide which formed was then dampened, ground, and dissolved in hydrochloric acid (nitric acid was used in Thenard’s initial experiments). A slight excess of sulfuric acid was then added to precipitate barium sulfate and regenerate hydrochloric acid. The procedure of barium peroxide solution and sulfate precipitation was repeated several times in the same solution to increase the peroxide concentration (concentrations of up to 33 percent by weight hydrogen peroxide could be achieved in this manner). The concentrated solution containing water, hydrogen peroxide, and hydrochloric acid, along with accumulated impurities, was cooled with ice and saturated with barium peroxide; iron and manganese impurities in the solution were then precipitated out as phosphates. The hydrochloric acid was removed by the addition of silver sulfate and the sulfate ion was removed by the subsequent addition of barium oxide. Further concentration was accomplished by vacuum distillation until “no further density increase occurs.” Thenard reported that 100 w/o hydrogen peroxide (on the basis of density data and the measurement of the volume of oxygen released) could be obtained by this technique. The first record of commercial production of hydrogen peroxide appeared in the 1865 to 1875 period.
    [Show full text]
  • Safer Disinfectant Use in Child Care and Schools During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Safer Disinfectant Use in Child Care and Schools During the COVID-19 Pandemic Vickie Leonard, PhD Environmental Health in Early Care and Educaon Project, Western States Pediatric Environmental Health Specialty Unit (WSPEHSU) 1 Why Should We Be Concerned about Environmental Health in ECE? 2 Why Should We Be Concerned about Environmental Health in ECE? • There are 8 million children in child care centers in the U.S. A child may spend up to 12,500 hours in an ECE facility. A million child care providers work in these centers in the U.S. Half are child-bearing age. • Many toxicants found in child care facilities are not addressed in state child care health and safety regulations. • No agency at the state or federal level is charged with ensuring children’s health and safety in and around schools and ECE facilities. • No systematic means exists for collecting data on environmental exposures in these buildings. • Teachers have more protection in these buildings (unions, OSHA) than children do 3 Why Should We Be Concerned about Environmental Health in ECE? • Many people think that adults and children are exposed to, and affected by, toxic chemicals in the same way. • This is not the case. • Children • have higher exposures to toxicants in the environment, • are more vulnerable to the effects of those toxicants than adults. 4 Cleaning and Disinfec?ng Products: A Major Source of Exposure in Child Care and Schools • Products used to clean, sanitize and disinfect child care facilities and schools are a good example of the pervasive and unregulated use of toxic chemicals that put the health of our children at risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Phenol Health and Safety Guide
    C - z_ IPCS INTERNATIONAL._ PROGRAMME ON CHEMICAL SAFETY OD 341 Health and Safety Guide No. 88 .P5 94 Ph c.2 PHENOL HEALTH AND SAFETY GUIDE ' UNITED NATIONS INTERNATIONAL ENVffiONMENTPROG~E LABOUR ORGANISATION WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, GENEVA 1994 1 I) 1\ ' ~Ii>cs Other HEALTH AND SAFETY GUIDES available: (continued on inside back cover) Acrolein (No . 67, 1992) Endrin (No. 60, 1991) Acrylamide (No. 45 , 1991) Epichlorohydrin (No. 8, 1987) Acrylonitrile (No. I, 1986) Ethylene oxide (No. 16, 1988) Aldicarb (No. 64, 1991) Fenitrothion (No. 65, 1991) Aldrin and dieldrin (No. 21 , 1988) Fenvalerate (No. 34, 1989) Allethrins (No. 24, 1989) Folpet (No. 72, 1992) Amitrole (No. 85 , 1994) Formaldehyde (No. 57, 1991) Ammonia (No. 37, 1990) Heptachlor (No. 14, 1988) Arsenic compounds, inorganic, other than Hexachlorobutadiene (No. 84, 1993) arsine (No. 70, 1992) Hexachlorocyclohexanes, alpha- and Atrazine (No. 47, 1990) beta- (No. 53, 1991) Barium (No. 46 , 1991) Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (No. 63 , 1991) Benomyl (No. 81, 1993) n-Hexane (No. 59, 1991) Bentazone (No. 48, 1990) Hydrazine (No. 56, 1991) Beryllium (No. 44, 1990) Isobenzan (No. 61 , 1991) !-Butanol (No. 3, 1987) Isobutanol (No. 9, 1987) 2-Butanol (No. 4, 1987) Kelevan (No. 2, 1987) ten-Butanol (No. 7, 1987) Lindane (No. 54 , 1991) Camphechlor (No. 40, 1990) Magnetic fields (No. 27, 1990) Captafol (No. 49, 1990) Methamidophos (No. 79, 1993) Captan (No. 50, 1990) Methyl bromide (Bromomethane) (No. 86, 1994) Carbaryl (No. 78, 1993) Methyl isobutyl ketone (No. 58, 1991) Carbendazim (No. 82, 1993) Methyl parathion (No. 75, 1992) Chlordane (No. 13 , 1988) Methylene chloride (No.
    [Show full text]
  • Silver As a Drinking-Water Disinfectant
    Silver as a drinking-water disinfectant Silver as a drinking-water disinfectant Alternative drinking-water disinfectants: silver ISBN 978-92-4-151369-2 © World Health Organization 2018 Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo). Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”. Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization. Suggested citation. Alternative drinking-water disinfectants: bromine, iodine and silver. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Cataloguing-in-Publication (CIP) data. CIP data are available at http://apps.who.int/iris. Sales, rights and licensing. To purchase WHO publications, see http://apps.who.int/bookorders.
    [Show full text]
  • Ammonia in Drinking-Water
    WHO/SDE/WSH/03.04/01 English only Ammonia in Drinking-water Background document for development of WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality _______________________ Originally published in Guidelines for drinking-water quality, 2nd ed. Vol. 2. Health criteria and other supporting information. World Health Organization, Geneva, 1996. © World Health Organization 2003 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization can be obtained from Marketing and Dissemination, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel: +41 22 791 2476; fax: +41 22 791 4857; email: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications – whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution – should be addressed to Publications, at the above address (fax: +41 22 791 4806; email: [email protected]). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. The World Health Organization does not warrant that the information contained in this publication is complete and correct and shall not be liable for any damages incurred as a result of its use.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Matricectomy with Phenol Versus Aesthetic Reconstruction. a Single Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial
    Journal of Clinical Medicine Article The Treatment of Ingrown Nail: Chemical Matricectomy With Phenol Versus Aesthetic Reconstruction. A Single Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial Juan Manuel Muriel-Sánchez 1, Ricardo Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo 2 , Pedro Montaño-Jiménez 1 and Manuel Coheña-Jiménez 1,* 1 Facultad de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología, Universidad de Sevilla, 41009 Sevilla, Spain; [email protected] (J.M.M.-S.); [email protected] (P.M.-J.) 2 Facultad de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 29 January 2020; Accepted: 18 March 2020; Published: 20 March 2020 Abstract: Background: In onychocryptosis surgery, incisional and non-incisional matricectomy is indicated according to the stage. The chemical matricectomy with 88% phenol solution is the gold standard and a wedge resection is indicated for more advanced stages. The aesthetic reconstruction has the advantages of the incisional procedure without eponychium incisions and an effectiveness similar to the chemical matricectomy with phenol. Objective: To compare the recurrence and the healing time between the chemical matricectomy with phenol and the aesthetic reconstruction. Methods: A comparative, prospective, parallel, randomized, and one-blinded clinical trial was registered with the European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT) with identification number 2019-001294-80. Thrity-four patients (56 feet) with 112 onychocryptosis were randomized in two groups. Thirty-six were treated with chemical matricectomy with phenol and 76 with aesthetic reconstruction. Each patient was blind to the surgical procedure assigned by the investigator. The primary outcome measurements were healing time and recurrence. The secondary outcome measurements were post-surgical bleeding, pain, inflammation, and infection rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Infection Prevention & Control Chlorhexidine
    Winnipeg Regional Health Authority Acute Care Infection Prevention & Control Manual INFECTION PREVENTION & CONTROL CHLORHEXIDINE GLUCONATE CONCENTRATION FOR HAND HYGIENE COMMUNICATION FORM PART 1: ISSUE & RECOMMENDATIONS Issue: The WRHA Infection Prevention and Control program (IP&C) was requested to research and recommend acceptable concentrations of chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) (2% versus 4%) for hand hygiene in all programs within WRHA sites, to ensure appropriate products are being used, and facilitate standardization. Recommendations: Use 2% CHG hand cleansers for hand hygiene when antimicrobial hand soap is indicated. Do NOT use 4% CHG for hand hygiene as the minimal improvement in efficacy (from 2%), does not warrant the increased frequency of skin irritation and breakdown, which ultimately impedes effective hand hygiene practices. PART 2: BACKGROUND: DISCUSSION OF ISSUE, OPTIONS AND ANALYSIS & REFERENCES Discussion of Issue: There are several different hand hygiene products used within and between WRHA sites. All areas should adhere to recommended hand hygiene products, as determined by available evidence. There are differences in when specific hand hygiene products are indicated. It is important to identify the appropriate product to use for the appropriate reason, as supported by evidence. Options and Analysis: 1. CHG has a cumulative effect when applied to the skin. In hand hygiene, this effect remains and is sustained, especially when hand hygiene is repeated. 2% CHG is appropriate for hand antisepsis because of the cumulative effect.1 2. Literature regarding differences between 2% and 4% CHG identifies there is minimal difference in efficacy between 2% and 4% CHG for hand antisepsis and cleansing.2 3. The frequency of skin irritation is concentration dependent, with products containing 4% most likely to cause dermatitis when used frequently for hand antisepsis.
    [Show full text]
  • Partial Nail Avulsion and Chemical Matricectomy: Ingrown Toenails
    Partial nail avulsion and chemical matricectomy: Ingrown toenails Intervention Removal (avulsion) of an ingrowing section of toenail and application of a caustic chemical to destroy the nail matrix (matricectomy). Indication Partial nail avulsion and chemical matricectomy relieve symptoms and prevent regrowth of the nail edge or recurrence of the ingrowing toenail. Possible causes of ingrowing toenails include improper Ingrowing toenails are a common problem and occur when the edge of the nail grows trimming of the nail, tearing nail into flesh at the side of the nail, causing a painful injury. The punctured skin can become off, overly curved nail, certain inflamed and infected. Ingrown toenails can be classified into three stages (see Figure 1): activities (eg running) and • mild (or Stage I) wearing constricting footwear. – oedema, erythema and pain • moderate (or Stage II) – inflammation and inflection with or without purulent discharge, in addition to the symptoms of Stage I • severe (or Stage III) – chronic inflammation, epithelialised hypertrophic granulation tissue. Figure 1. Three stages of ingrown toenails Source: Eekhof JA, Van Wijk B, Knuistingh Neven A, van der Wouden JC. Interventions for ingrowing toenails. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012;4:CD001541. Surgical interventions are commonly performed for patients in Stages II and III, and are more effective than non-surgical interventions in preventing the recurrence of an ingrowing toenail. The addition of chemical cauterisation (most commonly with phenol) at Stages II and III, may be more effective in preventing recurrence and regrowth of the ingrowing toenail than surgery alone. Contraindications Diminished vascular supply to the digit is a relative contraindication to nail surgery.
    [Show full text]