DOCSLIB.ORG

Ontario Line: Engagement Summary Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ontario Line: Engagement Summary Report Ontario Line: Engagement Summary Report April 2020 Prepared By: AECOM 55 Wyndham St. N, #15 Guelph, ON N1H 7T8 www.aecom.com Ontario Line: Engagement Summary Report April 2020 Statement of Qualifications and Limitations The attached Report (the “Report”) has been prepared by AECOM Canada Ltd. (“AECOM”) for the benefit of the Client (“Client”) in accordance with the agreement between AECOM and Client, including the scope of work detailed therein (the “Agreement”). The information, data, recommendations and conclusions contained in the Report (collectively, the “Information”): • is subject to the scope, schedule, and other constraints and limitations in the Agreement and the qualifications contained in the Report (the “Limitations”); • represents AECOM’s professional judgement in light of the Limitations and industry standards for the preparation of similar reports; • may be based on information provided to AECOM which has not been independently verified; • has not been updated since the date of issuance of the Report and its accuracy is limited to the time period and circumstances in which it was collected, processed, made or issued; • must be read as a whole and sections thereof should not be read out of such context; • was prepared for the specific purposes described in the Report and the Agreement; and • in the case of subsurface, environmental or geotechnical conditions, may be based on limited testing and on the assumption that such conditions are uniform and not variable either geographically or over time. AECOM shall be entitled to rely upon the accuracy and completeness of information that was provided to it and has no obligation to update such information. AECOM accepts no responsibility for any events or circumstances that may have occurred since the date on which the Report was prepared and, in the case of subsurface, environmental or geotechnical conditions, is not responsible for any variability in such conditions, geographically or over time. AECOM agrees that the Report represents its professional judgement as described above and that the Information has been prepared for the specific purpose and use described in the Report and the Agreement, but AECOM makes no other representations, or any guarantees or warranties whatsoever, whether express or implied, with respect to the Report, the Information or any part thereof. Without in any way limiting the generality of the foregoing, any estimates or opinions regarding probable construction costs or construction schedule provided by AECOM represent AECOM’s professional judgement in light of its experience and the knowledge and information available to it at the time of preparation. Since AECOM has no control over market or economic conditions, prices for construction labour, equipment or materials or bidding procedures, AECOM, its directors, officers and employees are not able to, nor do they, make any representations, warranties or guarantees whatsoever, whether express or implied, with respect to such estimates or opinions, or their variance from actual construction costs or schedules, and accept no responsibility for any loss or damage arising therefrom or in any way related thereto. Persons relying on such estimates or opinions do so at their own risk. Except (1) as agreed to in writing by AECOM and Client; (2) as required by-law; or (3) to the extent used by governmental reviewing agencies for the purpose of obtaining permits or approvals, the Report and the Information may be used and relied upon only by Metrolinx AECOM accepts no responsibility, and denies any liability whatsoever, to parties other than Metrolinx who may obtain access to the Report or the Information for any injury, loss or damage suffered by such parties arising from their use of, reliance upon, or decisions or actions based on the Report or any of the Information (“improper use of the Report”), except to the extent those parties have obtained the prior written consent of AECOM to use and rely upon the Report and the Information. Any injury, loss or damages arising from improper use of the Report shall be borne by the party making such use. This Statement of Qualifications and Limitations is attached to and forms part of the Report and any use of the Report is subject to the terms hereof. AECOM: 2015-04-13 © 2009-2015 AECOM Canada Ltd. All Rights Reserved. Contents 1 Introduction 9 1.1 Background 10 1.2 Purpose of Report 10 2 Communication and Engagement Process Overview 11 2.1 Communication and Engagement Process 12 2.1.1 Communication and Engagement Goals 13 2.2 Communication and Promotional Tactics 13 2.2.1 Ontario Line Webpage 14 2.2.2 Project Distribution List 14 2.2.3 Postcard Mailouts 15 2.2.4 Print and Digital Advertisements and News Features – Newspapers, TTC Screens and Metrolinx Blog 15 2.2.5 Online Advertising (Social Media) 16 2.3 Community Engagement 17 2.3.2 Engagement Questions 20 3 Summary of Participant Feedback 22 3.1 Introduction 23 3.2 What is most important to you about this Project? 23 3.2.1 Budget, Procurement and Timeline 23 3.2.2 Community Impacts 24 3.2.3 Environmental Impacts 26 3.2.4 Technology 27 3.2.5 Alignment 27 vi 3.3 What would you like to hear more about? 28 3.3.1 Budget, Timeline and Procurement 28 3.3.2 Community Impacts 30 3.3.3 Environmental Impacts 32 3.3.4 Technology and Design 33 3.3.5 Alignment 34 3.4 How would you like to hear from us going forward? 35 3.5 Is there anything we missed? Additional thoughts or concerns? 36 3.5.1 Budget, Timeline and Procurement 36 3.5.2 Engagement Process 37 3.5.3 Environmental and Community Impacts 38 3.5.4 Technology and Design 39 3.5.5 Alignment 40 3.5.6 Political Influence/ Government Involvement 41 4 Next Steps 42 4.1 Next Steps 43 Appendices Appendix A. Project Webpage Appendix B. Postcard Appendix C. Print and Digital Advertisements and News Features Appendix D. Social Media Appendix E. Public Meeting Materials vii Appendix F. Public Feedback Forms Appendix G. Public Feedback Table viii 1 Introduction 9 1.1 Background As we prepare for population increases in Toronto and across the Greater Golden Horseshoe, Metrolinx is building vital, fast, reliable transit solutions to serve everyone across the region. The proposed Ontario Line will bring approximately 15.5 kilometres of much-needed subway service to Toronto to make it faster and easier for hundreds of thousands of people to get where they need to be each day. Plans for the Ontario Line propose 15 stations, 17 connections to other transit options, 389,000 daily boardings, service as frequent as every 90 seconds, and 154,000 more people with walking-distance access to transit. To inform planning for the Ontario Line, Metrolinx communicated broadly about plans and held a series of information sessions in January and February 2020. Results gathered from these communications and sessions are summarized in this report and will inform project planning. Additional phases of engagement are planned to take place in 2020. 1.2 Purpose of Report This report summarizes the communication and engagement activities, as well as the feedback received from stakeholders and members of the public as a result of these activities, during the first phase of engagement for the Ontario Line. This report combines the comments received at information sessions, through online engagement via Metrolinx Engage, and through direct email correspondence. All public input will be considered by the Project Team and form part of the public record. 10 2 Communication and Engagement Process Overview 11 2.1 Communication and Engagement Process The first phase of communication and engagement focused on: • Who is Metrolinx? • What is the Ontario Line? • What’s happened so far? Key milestones • What we heard and what we’re doing about it • What’s next? • Ontario Line benefits • Travel time savings • Technology and capacity • Technology and infrastructure • Less crowding on your commute • Improved access • Above-ground alignment benefits • What’s happening now? • Existing conditions – studies underway • Noise and vibration • Cultural heritage • Natural environment • Maintenance and storage facility • Public-Private Partnership (P3) procurement • How can you stay involved and updated? • Share your feedback In-person and online communication and engagement tactics included: • Newspaper advertising and postcard mailouts to inform members of the public about information sessions and the Ontario Line webpage; 12 • TTC station digital screens; • An English and French Ontario Line webpage (Appendix A) to provide information about the Project, including invitations to online and in-person engagement opportunities, and links to related Project materials and studies; • A social media strategy, including posts and paid advertisements on Facebook and Twitter to reach a broader audience leading up to and during the information sessions; • Online engagement through Metrolinx Engage including a ‘submit a question’ feature, input opportunities on main topics and an online feedback form; • Take-home materials including a Noise and Vibration Information Sheet and high-level “tent” (foldable) information cards to provide a brief overview of the Ontario Line, with links to the Project webpage where people could go to receive more information; and • Information sessions held in five locations within Toronto, allowing community members to discuss the Ontario Line, provide input and ask questions directly to the Project Team. To create an inclusive public participation process, in-person engagement was mirrored online through the Ontario Line webpage. 2.1.1 Communication and Engagement Goals The following engagement activities allowed the Project Team to: • Introduce themselves and provide background information; • Introduce the study process and current design and environmental studies underway for the Ontario Line (e.g., alignment and station locations); • Engage with interested members of the public and stakeholders, including one-on-one discussions; and • Gather feedback related to key engagement questions to help inform the decision-making process.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Toronto Transit Commission Relief Line South Toronto Transit Commission
    Toronto Transit Commission Relief Line South Toronto Transit Commission The engineering support services provided by GZ included Location: Toronto, Canada preliminary design of the temporary and permanent support measures for the SEM caverns in the swelling conditions as well Date: 2017 - 2019 design of the waterproofing system. In addition, GZ provided constructability reviews and value engineering studies for the stations, as well as for the alignment. Structure: 2 large diameter underground Station caverns Length: 4.66 mi (7.5 km) Geology: Georgian Bay Shale, glacial tills Cost: - Client: HDR Owner: Toronto Transit Commission Preliminary SEM Station Design: n 2017, the Toronto Transit Commission approved the I Preliminary Engineering Design of the Relief Line South Project, which was a planned new 7.5 km long subway line that was intended to run through the center of downtown Toronto. The project was to connect the Yonge-University-Spadina Subway (Line 1) to the Bloor-Danforth Subway (Line 2) in the downtown area. The goal of the Relief Line South was to help relieve Figure 1. Proposed Relief Line South arrangement with stations. crowding on Line 1 south of Bloor, at the Bloor-Yonge Station, and on the surface transit routes coming in and out of downtown. Construction planning of the Relief Line South included construction of twin running tunnels by means of tunnel boring machines, five new stations, and modifications to three existing stations, which will be converted to interchange stations. Design of the Relief Line South progressed to the preliminary engineering stage, and was consequently re-envisioned as the southern section of the Ontario Line Project.
    [Show full text]
  • Relief Line and Yonge Subway Extension
    Relief Line and Yonge Subway Extension Leslie Woo Chief Planning Officer JUNE-26-17 RELIEF LINE AND YONGE SUBWAY EXTENSION OVERVIEWS • Both the Relief Line and the Yonge Subway Extension are priority projects included in The Big Move and will be included in the next Regional Transportation Plan • Each project makes a significant contribution to the regional transit network by: • Enhancing our ability to connect people to where they need to be • Adding capacity so that transit trips are more comfortable • Enabling more residents to choose transit for their trips • Spurring on local transit oriented development 2 A REGIONAL SYSTEM • The Relief Line and the Yonge Subway Extension are part of the regional transportation network needed to meet the GTHA’s growth to 2031 and beyond • The 7.4 km northern extension of the Yonge Subway (Line 1) from Finch Avenue into Richmond Hill will connect two provincial urban growth centres, North York Centre and Richmond Hill Centre, and significantly reduce the 2,500 daily bus trips along the busy Yonge corridor • The Relief Line is a critical infrastructure investment required to create capacity for new riders on the Yonge subway and provide a new connection into Toronto’s downtown • The Yonge Subway Extension would generate more access • The Relief Line would create more capacity • Both projects need to advance in an integrated way 3 PARTNERSHIPS Much progress is being made in bringing the parties together to work as a team to advance both projects Yonge Subway Extension • Metrolinx, City of Toronto, Toronto
    [Show full text]
  • The One Toronto Transit Plan the One Toronto Transit Plan
    THE ONE TORONTO TRANSIT PLAN THE ONE TORONTO TRANSIT PLAN As Mayor, John Tory will make Toronto more liveable, affordable and functional. Public transit is at the heart of what it takes to improve Toronto in each of these areas. John Tory’s One Toronto Transit Plan is a collection of initiatives and public transit investments that will get our city moving in seven years, and provide relief to the Yonge-University-Spadina subway line. THE ONE TORONTO PLAN WILL: • Start construction of the Scarborough subway extension immediately. • Engage the City with the Government of Ontario’s and Metrolinx’s plans for Regional Express Rail (RER) – all-day, two-way surface subway service on existing GO track lines with new higher-speed vehicles . • Start with the SmartTrack line as the first RER project, providing 53 km of relief. The SmartTrack line will run from the Airport Corporate Centre in the west, down to Union Station and back up to Markham in the east, with 22 new station stops and four interchanges with the TTC rapid transit network. • Finance the City’s one third of the capital cost of the SmartTrack line without raising property taxes, using tax increment financing. • Provide new express bus services for a segment of travelers that can be moved much quicker if fewer stops are made en route. Examples, which have been discussed, include, Don Mills Road, Dufferin Street and Front Street/Liberty Village. THE ONE TORONTO TRANSIT PLAN BENEFITS ASSOCIATED WITH TORY’S ONE TORONTO TRANSIT RELIEF PLAN INCLUDE: • Bringing relief sooner, to more Torontonians, rather than just the downtown- concentrated proposals of other candidates.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment 4 – Assessment of Ontario Line
    EX9.1 Attachment 4 – Assessment of Ontario Line As directed by City Council in April 2019, City and TTC staff have assessed the Province’s proposed Ontario Line. The details of this assessment are provided in this attachment. 1. Project Summary 1.1. Project Description The Ontario Line was included as part of the 2019 Ontario Budget1 as a transit project that will cover similar study areas as the Relief Line South and North, as well as a western extension. The proposed project is a 15.5-kilometre higher-order transit line with 15 stations, connecting from Exhibition GO station to Line 5 at Don Mills Road and Eglinton Avenue East, near the Science Centre station, as shown in Figure 1. Figure 1. Ontario Line Proposal (source: Metrolinx IBC) Since April 2019, technical working groups comprising staff from the City, TTC, Metrolinx, Infrastructure Ontario and the Ministry of Transportation met regularly to understand alignment and station location options being considered for the Ontario 1 http://budget.ontario.ca/2019/contents.html Attachment 4 - Assessment of Ontario Line Page 1 of 20 Line. Discussions also considered fleet requirements, infrastructure design criteria, and travel demand modelling. Metrolinx prepared an Initial Business Case (IBC) that was publicly posted on July 25, 2019.2 The IBC compared the Ontario Line and Relief Line South projects against a Business As Usual scenario. The general findings by Metrolinx were that "both Relief Line South and Ontario Line offer significant improvements compared to a Business As Usual scenario, generating $3.4 billion and $7.4 billion worth of economic benefits, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Relief Line Update
    Relief Line Update Mathieu Goetzke, Vice-President, Planning David Phalp, Manager, Rapid Transit Planning FEBRUARY 7, 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The Relief Line South alignment identified by the City of Toronto as preferred, has a Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) above 1.0, demonstrating the project’s value; however, since it is close to 1.0, it is highly sensitive to costs, so more detailed design work and procurement method choice will be of importance to maintain or improve this initial BCR. • Forecasts suggest that Relief Line South will attract ridership to unequivocally justify subway-level service; transit-oriented development opportunities can further boost ridership. • Transit network forecasts show that Relief Line South needs to be in operation before the Yonge North Subway Extension. Relief Line North provides further crowding relief for Line 1. RELIEF LINE UPDATE 2 SUBWAY EXPANSION - PROJECT STATUS Both Relief Line North and South and the Yonge North Subway Extension are priority projects included in the 2041 Regional Transportation Plan. RELIEF LINE UPDATE 3 RELIEF LINE SOUTH: Initial Business Case Alignments Evaluated • Metrolinx is developing an Initial Business Case on Relief Line South, evaluating six alignments according to the Metrolinx Business Case Guidance and the Auditor General’s 2018 recommendations • Toronto City Council approved the advancement of alignment “A” (Pape- Queen via Carlaw & Eastern) • Statement of Completion of the Transit Project Assessment Process (TPAP) received October 24, 2018. RELIEF LINE UPDATE 4 RELIEF
    [Show full text]
  • Relief Line South Environmental Project Report, Section 5 Existing and Future Conditions
    Relief Line South Environmental Project Report Section 5 - Existing and Future Conditions The study area is unique in that it is served by most transit modes that make up the Greater 5 Existing and Future Conditions Toronto Area’s (GTA’s) transit network, including: The description of the existing and future environment within the study area is presented in this • TTC Subway – High-speed, high-capacity rapid transit serving both long distance and local section to establish an inventory of the baseline conditions against which the potential impacts travel. of the project are being considered as part of the Transit Project Assessment Process (TPAP). • TTC Streetcar – Low-speed surface routes operating on fixed rail in mixed traffic lanes (with Existing transportation, natural, social-economic, cultural, and utility conditions are outlined some exceptions), mostly serving shorter-distance trips into the downtown core and feeding within this section. More detailed findings for each of the disciplines have been documented in to / from the subway system. the corresponding memoranda provided in the appendices. • TTC Conventional Bus – Low-speed surface routes operating in mixed traffic, mostly 5.1 Transportation serving local travel and feeding subway and GO stations. • TTC Express Bus – Higher-speed surface routes with less-frequent stops operating in An inventory of the existing local and regional transit, vehicular, cycling and pedestrian mixed traffic on high-capacity arterial roads, connecting neighbourhoods with poor access transportation networks in the study area is outlined below. to rapid transit to downtown. 5.1.1 Existing Transit Network • GO Rail - Interregional rapid transit primarily serving long-distance commuter travel to the downtown core (converging at Union Station).
    [Show full text]
  • Ontario Line Initial Business Case
    MEMORANDUM To: Metrolinx Board of Directors From: Mathieu Goetzke Chief Planning Officer (A) Date: September 12, 2019 Re: Subway Program – Ontario Line Update Resolution RESOLVED, based on the report prepared by the Chief Planning Officer, entitled “Subway Program – Ontario Line Update” and any further amendments directed by the Board at its meeting on September 12, 2019; THAT the Board endorses the results of the Ontario Line Initial Business Case; AND THAT, the Ontario Line project be advanced to the Preliminary Design stage and further evaluated through a Preliminary Design Business Case. Executive Summary In summer 2018, the government directed MTO to “…lead the development of an implementation strategy for provincial ownership of the TTC subway network and other strategic transit/transportation assets in the City of Toronto.” This commitment has since been reiterated in the 2018 Fall Economic Outlook and Fiscal Review, and in the 2019 Ontario Budget. In the 2019 Ontario Budget, the Province announced its plan to build four subway projects, with a total preliminary cost estimate of $28.5 billion. Ontario Line was one of the priority projects announced, along with the Scarborough Subway Extension, the Yonge Subway Extension and the Eglinton West Extension. The budget also included a renewal of the commitment to upload new subway projects and the existing network from the City of Toronto. The Getting Ontario Moving Act, 2019, which received Royal Assent on June 6, 2019, amended the Metrolinx Act to enable the Province to upload responsibility for new rapid transit projects, including subway projects, from the City of Toronto. A regulation made under this act has designated the Relief Line/Ontario Line, the Yonge Subway Extension, and the Scarborough Subway Extension the sole responsibility of the Province, through Metrolinx.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterfront Transit Network Vision – Phase 1
    ACTION REQUIRED ____________________________________________________________________________ Date: July 11, 2016 Subject: Waterfront Transit Network Vision – Phase 1 Attached for the consideration of the TTC Board is Executive Committee Item 16.17 “Waterfront Transit Network Vision – Phase 1” which was adopted by the Executive Committee at its meeting on June 28, 2016. Original signed by Vincent Rodo Chief Financial & Administration Officer Attachment Waterfront Transit Network Vision – Phase 1 http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-94287.pdf Appendix 1 – Planning History for Waterfront Transit http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-94534.pdf Appendix 2 – Waterfront Transit Feeling congested? Evaluation Framework http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-94535.pdf EX16.17 STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Waterfront Transit Network Vision – Phase 1 Date: June 20, 2016 To: Executive Committee Deputy City Manager, Cluster B From: Chief Planner & Executive Director, City Planning Division Wards: 5, 6, 13, 14, 19, 20, 28, 30 and 32 Reference P:\2016\ClusterB\PLN\EX16002 Number: SUMMARY At its meeting of November 3 and 4, 2015, City Council directed staff to work with the TTC and Waterfront Toronto on a comprehensive review of waterfront transit initiatives and options (Item EX 9.9). An external consultant, Steer Davies Gleave, was retained to assist staff with the review. The study area is from Long Branch in the west to Woodbine Avenue in the east, and south of the Queensway/Queen Street. The Waterfront Transit "Reset" was divided into two phases. Council approved funding for Phase 1 of the "reset" for the following work program items: review all relevant background material; create an overall study vision with related objectives; develop a preliminary list of improvement concepts; consult with the public and stakeholders; identify preferred concepts for further study; and develop a scope of work for Phase 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Smarttrack Ridership Analysis
    SMARTTRACK RIDERSHIP ANALYSIS PROJECT FINAL REPORT Prepared for the City Manager, City of Toronto by: Eric J. Miller, Ph.D. Professor, Department of Civil Engineering Director, Transportation Research Institute Research Director, Travel Modelling Group University of Toronto James Vaughan & Monika Nasterska Travel Modelling Group, University of Toronto Transportation Research Institute June, 2016 i Executive Summary Project Objectives On December 11, 2014, City Council directed the City Manager in consultation with the Province/Metrolinx to develop a work plan to undertake an accelerated review of the SmartTrack and RER plans. Council also directed the City Manager to retain the specialized services of the University of Toronto Transportation Research Institute (UTTRI) to support the planning analysis and required transit ridership modelling as a component of the overall review.1 On February 10, 2015, City Council considered the report EX2.2 SmartTrack Work Plan (2015- 2016), and approved the accelerated work plan for the review of SmartTrack.2 The UTTRI component of this work was to provide transit ridership estimates and other key network performance measures using the City’s new Regional Travel Demand Model (GTAModel Version 4.0) developed at the University of Toronto by UTTRI. As detailed in the final Terms of Reference for the UTTRI work, this work included: • Confirming the integrated RER and SmartTrack Service Concept to be modelled. • Completion and validation of a new travel demand model system to be used by the City of Toronto in this and similar studies of transit ridership and travel demand. • Development and review of forecasting assumptions that provide key inputs into the transit ridership forecasts.
    [Show full text]
  • Relief Line South Environmental Project Report, Executive Summary
    Relief Line South Environmental Project Report Executive Summary ES Figure 1: Relief Line South Alignment and Station Introduction and Background (Section 1) Providing additional rapid transit capacity into and within the downtown Toronto area has long been an objective for the City of Toronto. Existing transit services are reaching or exceeding their practical capacity during peak periods. Significant inbound transit capacity deficiencies exist during the morning peak period, particularly on Line 1 (Yonge) south of Bloor and at the Bloor- Yonge interchange, and several GO rail lines, but also on streetcar routes east and west of downtown. With continued growth projected for the City of Toronto and the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA), there is an urgent need for improvements. A number of potential infrastructure, operational, and policy improvements to provide additional transit capacity into and within downtown Toronto have been considered; however, these measures will not on their own be sufficient to address capacity issues during peak periods into the future. As such, there exists a need to examine additional opportunities to enhance rapid transit, particularly into the downtown area. In response to these issues, and the concern that the planned Yonge North Subway Extension (YNSE) into York Region would exacerbate crowding on the Yonge Subway line, in 2009 Toronto City Council approved a series of motions requesting that Metrolinx prioritize a Relief Line within its 15-year plan; that Metrolinx prioritize the Relief Line in advance of the YNSE; and that the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) commence studies to evaluate the merits of the Relief Line. The Downtown Rapid Transit Expansion Study (DRTES) – Phase 1 Strategic Plan, completed and adopted in October 2012, found that while policy actions could aid in improving downtown transportation issues, it was clear that a Relief Line was required to address Downtown Toronto’s transit needs in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Toronto's Transit Network Plan: Phase 1
    EX13.3 STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Developing Toronto's Transit Network Plan: Phase 1 Date: March 3, 2016 To: Executive Committee City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Cluster B and Chief Planner & From: Executive Director, City Planning Division Wards: All Reference Number: SUMMARY Significant investment has been made by all three orders of government to expand the transit network and address years of underinvestment in a critical infrastructure system for Toronto. The Toronto York-Spadina Subway Extension (TYSSE), Eglinton LRT (Mount Dennis to Kennedy) and Finch West LRT will be in service by 2021. In order to sustain recent progress, planning for new transit expansion projects must keep pace given the lead times to plan, design and build complex infrastructure. The purpose of this report is to recommend advancing planning and technical analysis on SmartTrack, Scarborough Subway Extension, Relief Line and Waterfront Transit, in order to set the stage for upcoming discussions on funding and financing new transit. In particular, this report recommends: • Finalizing the SmartTrack concept by narrowing the planning analysis to focus on key elements: an optimized Eglinton West LRT extension to Pearson Airport; and two SmartTrack/GO RER integration options that propose an urban service frequency at 11 existing GO RER stations with 4 to 8 new stations on the Kitchener GO and Stouffville/Lakeshore East GO Corridors; • Approving Pape to Downtown via Queen/Richmond as the preferred corridor for the Relief Line, and proceed to determine the preferred alignment and stations; • Completing the review of corridor options and related work for the Scarborough Subway Extension, and develop recommendations to integrate the proposed, optimized Eglinton East LRT into the University of Toronto Scarborough Campus secondary plan; and identify areas in need of an Avenue Study to facilitate intensification along the proposed LRT corridor.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Plan Review: Transportation Policies
    January 2020 PH13.3 Attachment 6 Five-Year Official Plan Review TRANSPORTATION POLICIES PHASE 2 -PUBLIC & STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION SUMMARY REPORT DILLON CONSULTING LIMITED i Phase 2 Executive Summary In the fall of 2018, the City of Toronto (the City) retained Dillon Consulting Limited (Dillon) to design and deliver a consultation program to garner stakeholder and public feedback on draft amendments to the Official Plan (OP) Transportation Policies. The review and revision of existing transportation policies is part of the City’s Five-Year Official Plan Review process, and as such, the consultation program was designed to solicit feedback city-wide. The Consultation program was broken into two phases and this report summarizes the engagement for Phase 2. The consultation program was focused on four transportation policy topics: Transit, Cycling, Automated Vehicles and Shared Mobility, and Street Related Map and Schedules. Phase 2 Consultation began with a stakeholder workshop in April, 2019. Four public meetings (one in each district: North York, Etobicoke, Scarborough and Downtown) occurred in May, 2019. An additional stakeholder meeting was held in May, 2019 in an effort to reach out to advocates, organizations and academic researchers promoting accessibility and safety for vulnerable road and transit users, including the elderly, women, children, and people living with disabilities. A statutory public open house was held on November 26, 2019. The stakeholder and public meetings followed the same general format: a presentation of the transportation policies under review, a summary of What We Heard from the Phase 1 consultation and proposed key policy changes. This was combined with breakout discussion tables to examine each of the four policy topics under review in more detail.
    [Show full text]