DOCSLIB.ORG

Pittsburgh, PA and the University of Chicago, and Chicago, IL

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pittsburgh, PA and the University of Chicago, and Chicago, IL A Study on City-University Partnerships for Smart City Technologies By Benjamin J. Preis BS in Physics, Peace and Justice Studies Tufts University Medford, MA (2011) Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in City Planning at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2019 © 2019 Benjamin Preis. All Rights Reserved The author hereby grants to MIT the permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of the thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Author________________________________________________________________________ Department of Urban Studies and Planning May 23, 2019 Certified by____________________________________________________________________ Professor Lawrence Susskind Department of Urban Studies and Planning Thesis Supervisor Accepted by___________________________________________________________________ Professor of the Practice, Ceasar McDowell Co-Chair, MCP Committee Department of Urban Studies and Planning A Study on City-University Partnerships for Smart City Technologies By Benjamin J. Preis Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning on May 23, 2019 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in City Planning at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Abstract On September 14, 2015, the Obama Administration announced its Smart Cities Initiative, a $160 million investment in a range of research and development activities focused on “Smart Cities.” The MetroLab Network, a consortium of partnerships involving cities and their universities, was announced as part of the Initiative. In order to join the Network, university-city partners had to agree to follow a set of rules and procedures to govern their partnership. This research explores the history, governance, goals, and outcomes of two such partnerships: Carnegie Mellon University and Pittsburgh, PA and the University of Chicago, and Chicago, IL. Although these two partnerships work under the same MetroLab Network umbrella, the type and breadth of the activities each university undertook on behalf of their city partner varied greatly. The structure of the partnerships, project selection; deliverables and outcomes; data sharing and data ownership; levels and forms of community engagement; funding; technology transfer; and engagement with and impact of MetroLab were quite different in the two cases. Levels of satisfaction among the city partners, commitments to protect citizens’ rights, and the level of control granted to each of the partners varied markedly. These two cases are presented in the context of the history of city- university partnerships, university-community partnerships and the emergence of interest in Smart Cities in the United States. The thesis offers seven recommendations for MetroLab, cities, and universities involved in this type of research moving forward: 1) formalize expectations for every project; 2) Negotiate with funders to prioritize local needs; 3) Mitigate negative impacts of experiments; 4) Develop expertise and allies throughout city government; 5) Seek involvement throughout the university; 6) Engage citizens in the partnership, not just the projects; and 7) Develop revenue sharing agreements for projects that commercialize. Thesis Advisor: Lawrence Susskind Professor of Environmental and Urban Planning Thesis Reader: Sarah Williams Associate Professor of Technology and Urban Planning Acknowledgements I would first like to thank Larry Susskind for his support and mentorship over these past two years at DUSP. I have learned so much working with him, and am grateful for the time and help he has given me as I pursued this project. I would also like to thank my reader, Sarah Williams, for her advice and feedback on this thesis. Other faculty and staff, at DUSP, MIT, Harvard, Tufts, and beyond have given me invaluable insight, and shaped my intellectual journey in bringing me here. Thank you to my interviewees, for their time and openness during the research process. I quite literally could not have conducted this research without them, and I am thankful to have learned so much from them, about the specific partnerships, about academia, and about local government. It has been a pleasure learning from them, and I am happy that I was able to visit Chicago, Pittsburgh, and Atlanta to speak with so many local leaders. I would also like to thank my former colleagues in Washington, DC. If it were not for them, and for my introduction to the Smart Cities Initiative, I may not have found urban planning, and certainly could not have written this thesis. Thank you as well to the innumerable students, faculty members, professionals, and others who spoke with me as I was considering, and applying to, graduate school (both times!) Your advice, ideas, connections, and kindness made this degree possible. Finally, I would like to thank my mom, Annie Preis, for all she has done, always, to help me. Thank you to my other family members for their love and support. Thank you to Hannah Seigel for her support and belief in me. Thank you to my friends within and beyond DUSP for bringing me joy, helping me through the difficulties, and everything in between. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. DGE-1745302. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The William Emerson Travel Grant also provided financial support for travel for this research. 3 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION AND CONTEXT ........................................................................................................ 6 HISTORICAL CONTEXT .......................................................................................................................... 6 The University and the City ............................................................................................................. 6 University Service to the City .........................................................................................................10 SMART CITIES .....................................................................................................................................17 Universities and Smart Cities .........................................................................................................20 Federal Interest in Smart Cities ......................................................................................................23 METROLAB NETWORK ........................................................................................................................26 RESEARCH QUESTIONS AND METHODOLOGY ..............................................................................31 RESEARCH QUESTIONS ........................................................................................................................31 CASE SELECTION .................................................................................................................................32 METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................................................................33 PITTSBURGH ........................................................................................................................................35 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................35 Antecedents to the Current Partnership ..........................................................................................36 The “21s” at CMU .........................................................................................................................37 Description of the Projects .............................................................................................................39 University of Pittsburgh and the Western Pennsylvania Regional Data Center (WPRDC) ................44 METRO21 & INNOVATION AND PERFORMANCE: THE PARTNERSHIP .......................................................46 Partnership Structure: Formal Agreements.....................................................................................46 Partnership Structure: City Structure .............................................................................................47 Partnership Structure: University Structure ....................................................................................48 Partnership Structure: Project Selection .........................................................................................50 Partnership Structure: Deliverables & Check Ins............................................................................51 MetroLab and Pittsburgh ...............................................................................................................52 Partnership and Project Funding ...................................................................................................53 PROJECT ANALYSIS: PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS, ROAD MONITORING, AND OPERA ..................................54 Project Benefits and Goals .............................................................................................................54 Project Data ..................................................................................................................................58
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2015 Annual Report
    A Message from Chief Cameron McLay There are a great many things going well in Pittsburgh today. We have been selected as one of six pilot sites for President Obama’s National Initiative for Building Community Trust and Justice. This provides us with training and research support from the best minds in the nation, making us the envy of forward-thinking agencies everywhere. While many cities our size are experiencing dramatic escalations of violence and strong divides between police and the communities they serve, our trends are more moderate. Our violent crime rates have not seen post-Ferguson escalations. In other cities, tensions between police and communities of color run high. In many cities, for example the Black Lives Matter movement seems to be divisive in some places; but not here. At the Pittsburgh Urban League, 2015 “Black Lives Matter” conference, the discussions were a call to action to all community members to stop the violence creating a disparate impact of victimization on young black males. “If black lives matter, what are we (the African-American community) doing to help our Chief be successful keeping us all safe?” was the discussion. There was no anger with police, just passion to make Pittsburgh a “Most Livable City” for all! It was a moving experience, instilling me with an even greater sense of mission. This is a passion members of the Pittsburgh Bureau of Police share. We are proud to protect. We are proud to serve. Our Vision Statement reflects that pride: Through our commitment to professional service all our communities, the Bureau of Police is a source of pride for our City, and a benchmark for policing excellence.
    [Show full text]
  • CPP Teach-In 07-16-2020.Pdf
    Predictive Policing in Pittsburgh CAPP-PGH (Coalition against Predictive Policing) Why we are Predictive policing in Pittsburgh holding this teach-in? Predictive policing was officially tested without public input from 2017 to 2019 Continuing the use of this technology will itself be a continuation of the city’s and country’s racist policing legacy Fitzpatrick, D., & Gorr, W., & Neill, D. (2018) Hot-spot-based predictive policing in Pittsburgh: A Controlled Field Experiment How Predictive Policing Works In Pittsburgh Generates a map of “hot spots” each week Pittsburgh Metro21 Police are deployed model collects 911 calls on extra patrols to & past crime data hot spots Find patterns in data: geographic & temporal How did Predictive Policing Come to Pittsburgh? 2009: Prof. Daniel B. Neill develops CrimeScan, a predictive policing model, for Chicago Police Department 2014: Pittsburgh Police Chief Cameron McLay Pittsburgh Police Chief Cameron McLay: an “unbiased” form of policing Saw predictive policing as an “unbiased” form of policing 2016: Homewood as an initial pilot zone 2016: Partnership between Metro21, PBP, 2017: Full deployment funded by Richard King Mellon Foundation Oct 2016: Homewood becomes the pilot area for Pittsburgh CrimeScan, trial expands to city in 2017, and ended in 2019 From hotspot paper: ● “Beginning on February 20, 2017, we began a pilot period in which we initiated hot spot selection for one of the six police zones in Pittsburgh. By May 1, 2017, we had expanded the program to all six police zones, and upper level command staff from all zones were involved in directing proactive patrols to hot spots selected by the forecasting models” ● “The experimental phase of the field study has been running for 16 months (May 1, 2017 through August 31, 2018) and is ongoing” (written in Oct 2018) https://www.dropbox.com/s/pxbolwptrpd6b71/hotspot_paper.pdf?dl=0 CMU’s “Urban Laboratory” “Our partnership with Carnegie Mellon has actually gone to the next stage.
    [Show full text]
  • Pittsburgh Quarterly | Spring 2 0 1 6 75
    *PQ_spr16_46-113.qxp_Layout 1 2/16/16 10:05 AM Page 75 PITTSBURGH TODAY PITTSBURGH TODAY & TOMORROW REGIONAL ANNUAL REPORT n order for citizens to make the best possible decisions about the future of their region, they need a foundation of reliable information and a clear understanding of the issues. Providing that information—through statistical comparisons and in-depth journalistic reports—is the mission of Pittsburgh Today, one of the nation’s oldest regional indicators Iprojects, which is part of the University of Pittsburgh’s University Center for Social and Urban Research. In this special annual report—Pittsburgh Today & Tomorrow—we assess how Pittsburgh is doing compared with 14 other regions in key economic and quality of life measures. We also examine key 2016 issues affecting Pittsburgh, and we’ve asked a group of leaders to offer an idea they believe will improve our region. To view Pittsburgh Today’s regional indicators and journalistic reports, visit pittsburghtoday.org >> pittsburgh quarterly | spring 2 0 1 6 75 2 *PQ_spr16_46-113.qxp_Layout 1 2/16/16 10:05 AM Page 76 TO DAY TOMORROW PITTSBURGH & 8 BY THE NUMBERS: Unemployment Unemployment rate, by MSA 1) minneapolis 3.2 2) denver 3.4 benchmark avg 4.6 11) pittsburgh 5.0 14) baltimore 5.5 15) detroit 5.9 0%1 2 3 4 5 6 data source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, seasonally adjusted rates, November 2015 they include the intermediate activities that allow companies to do business. Accounting, legal services, engineering servic- ECONOMY es, computer systems design, and business financing are just a subset of the services tallied in this sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Elected Officials
    UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Office of the Chancellor Institute& of Politics retreatelected officials The Social and Political Economy of Poverty and Mass Incarceration in America: Causes and Consequences September 10 and 11, 2015 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH OFFICE OF THE CHANCELLOR and INSTITUTE OF POLITICS welcome you to the NINETEENTH ANNUAL ELECTED OFFICIALS RETREAT The Social and Political Economy of Poverty and Mass I ncarceration in America—Do Costs and Consequences Provide Cause for Change? September 10-11, 2015 Sheraton Hotel Pittsburgh at Station Square If you have questions about the materials or any aspect of the program, please inquire at the registration desk. 1 Table of Contents About the Institute 3 Director’s Note 4 Program Agenda 6 Biographies 10 Program Criteria and Strategies 24 Board of Fellows List 27 Policy Committee Lists 30 For Further Reading 44 Evaluation Instructions 50 2 About the Institute MISSION The Institute of Politics delivers timely information about the great issues affecting our region to elected officials and community leaders—and the public whom they serve—and provides a neutral forum where that knowledge and associated diverse viewpoints are discussed, digested, enriched, and applied to the goal of promoting an improved quality of life, government efficiency, and economic vitality in Western Pennsylvania. VISION The Institute of Politics will be recognized as the region’s most effective partner in the development of enlightened public policy that promotes the vitality of Western Pennsylvania to the benefit of individuals, institutions, and businesses. ELECTED OFFICIALS RETREAT STATEMENT OF PURPOSE The March 7, 1997 Institute of Politics Board of Fellows meeting produced a request that the University of Pittsburgh host a retreat for public officials from different levels of government in Western Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of the National Initiative for Building Community Trust and Justice on Police Administrative Outcomes Daniel S
    JUSTICE POLICY CENTE R RESEARCH REPORT Impact of the National Initiative for Building Community Trust and Justice on Police Administrative Outcomes Daniel S. Lawrence Nancy La Vigne Jesse Jannetta Jocelyn Fontaine August 2019 ABOUT THE URBAN INSTITUTE The nonprofit Urban Institute is a leading research organization dedicated to developing evidence-based insights that improve people’s lives and strengthen communities. For 50 years, Urban has been the trusted source for rigorous analysis of complex social and economic issues; strategic advice to policymakers, philanthropists, and practitioners; and new, promising ideas that expand opportunities for all. Our work inspires effective decisions that advance fairness and enhance the well-being of people and places. Copyright © August 2019. Urban Institute. Permission is granted for reproduction of this file, with attribution to the Urban Institute. Cover image via Shutterstock. Contents Acknowledgments v Executive Summary vi Background 1 Methods 3 Findings 6 Birmingham, AL 6 Implementation Context 6 Timeline of Policing Events and National Initiative Dosage 7 Impact on Administrative Outcomes 8 Fort Worth, TX 10 Implementation Context 10 Timeline of Policing Events and National Initiative Dosage 11 Impact on Administrative Outcomes 12 Gary, IN 15 Implementation Context 15 Timeline of Policing Events and National Initiative Dosage 16 Impact on Administrative Outcomes 17 Minneapolis, MN 17 Implementation Context 17 Timeline of Policing Events and National Initiative Dosage 19 Impact on Administrative
    [Show full text]
  • Social Media Vs. Privacy Rights from Burning Building by Martin Halloran Are Often Nonsensical
    LEBRATIN CE G FRANCIS N CO SA 40YEARS P O LIC E W O S M ER EN OFFIC c Official Publication Of The C SAN FRANCISCO POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION This Publication was Produced and Printed in California, USA ✯ Buy American ✯ Support Local Business VOLUME 47, NUMBER 2 SAN FRANCISCO, FEBRUARY 2015 www.sfpoa.org Big Brother is watching Heroic Rescue: 13-Year-Old Jumps Social Media vs. Privacy Rights From Burning Building By Martin Halloran are often nonsensical. Why? Those After Saving His Dog SFPOA President departments believe that they have to demonstrate to their Boards of Super- SFPD personnel from This past December, the depart- visors, City Counsels, Mayors, and the Mission Station save ment issued Department Bulletin public that they are ahead of this new- a 13 year old boy and 14-267, Social Media Policy. This DB media curve. I do not believe that is his beloved dog from addresses new grounds beyond DGO the situation in the SFPD. Chief Suhr’s 10.07 and DGO 10.08. All members DB 14-267 is a fair and reasonable first a raging four alarm need to be aware that this DB will step in this new and ever-evolving apartment fire. likely be amended within the next employer/employee arena. year. It is highly probable that the On the flip side, law enforcement In what seems like a se- department will establish, in the very associations are scrambling to get a quence right out of an action near future, a new DGO related to so- handle on appropriate member de- movie, Alessandro Gonza- cial media and information shared by fense premises.
    [Show full text]
  • The Welcoming Pittsburgh Plan a Roadmap for Change
    THE WELCOMING PITTSBURGH PLAN A ROADMAP FOR CHANGE The Welcoming Pittsburgh Plan CONTENTS photo by Welcoming Pittsburgh team A MESSAGE FROM THE MAYOR 3 INTRODUCTION 4 COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION 5 THE VISION 9 HOW WE’LL GET THERE 10 RECOMMENDATIONS 11 METHODOLOGY 41 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 42 END NOTES 44 A ROADMAP FOR CHANGE 2 A ROADMAP FOR CHANGE 3 A More Welcoming Pittsburgh INTRODUCTION Immigration and migration drove the early 20th-century economic and population growth that built Pittsburgh into a city of 700,000 and one of America’s great industrial centers. Like many of America’s post-industrial cities, Pittsburgh has seen substantial population loss in recent generations, but unlike most others, our city has also seen an accompanying decline: from a thriving destination for immigrants at the height of our population growth to currently having the lowest percentage of new immigration of any of America’s top 40 metropolitan areas.1 Although a resurgent Pittsburgh has been celebrated as “The Most Livable City” numerous times in recent decades, 25% of the city’s current population has yet to demonstrably share that celebrated livability.2 These critical challenges – stagnant population growth, diminished diversity, and persistent hurdles to opportunity – demand a comprehensive approach to change if Pittsburgh is to continue to thrive in the 21st century. OPPORTUNITY TO ACT NOW A ROADMAP FOR CHANGE In response to these challenges, Mayor William Peduto has In May 2014, Mayor Peduto launched the Welcoming Pittsburgh committed to growing Pittsburgh’s population by 20,000 initiative, convening a diverse and distinguished 40-person new residents over the next 10 years – a commitment that Advisory Council from a pool of more than 100 applicants, to involves creating a more welcoming city, one that embraces collaborate in developing priorities and recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategies for Change
    STRATEGIES FOR CHANGE: Building More Peaceful Communities © The Greater Pittsburgh COALITION AGAINST VIOLENCE (CAV) Creating Long Term Solutions to Deep Rooted Problems “Moving from Complaint to Possibility…from Planning to Implementation to Mobilization” 3rd Edition Produced 2015-2016 By the Working Group of the Coalition Against Violence First Edition Title “Strategies for Change: The Full Document” In partnership with the Black Political Empowerment Project c/o Freedom Unlimited, Inc. 2201 Wylie Avenue, Pittsburgh PA 15219 (412) 758-7898 or (412) 212-8775 www.b-pep.net and www.coalitionagainstviolence.net Email: [email protected] Permission is granted to reproduce this document, in part, or in its entirety. However, please contact the Coalition Against Violence to let us know how this document is being used. Email address: [email protected] Go to http://www.b-pep.net for On-Line Version Foreword As the Administrative Judge of the Juvenile and Family Court of Allegheny County, I preside over a court where the common dominator among court users is trauma. For the most part, people enter the Family Division due to a traumatic event in their lives. They come to our courthouse because their marriage is in crisis and one of them has filed for divorce. They come because they can’t agree upon the custody of their children or medical, educational and religious decisions for their children. They come seeking protection from abuse. They come because Child Welfare has taken their children. They come because they are victims of juvenile crime. They come because their children are accused of crimes and they are worried about their futures.
    [Show full text]
  • Pittsburgh Police Civil Actions
    1 City of Pittsburgh Department of Public Safety Bureau of Police 2014 Statistical Report William Peduto, Mayor Cameron McLay, Chief 2 CITY OF PITTSBURGH DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY BUREAU OF POLICE ANNUAL REPORT 2013 Accountability Integrity A PLEAC Accredited Law Enforcement Agency Respect 1 LAW ENFORCEMENT CODE OF ETHICS “As a Law Enforcement Officer, my fundamental duty is to serve the community; to safeguard lives and property; to protect the innocent against deception, the weak against oppression or intimidation, and the peaceful against violence or disorder; and to respect the Constitutional rights of all to liberty, equality and justice.” “I will keep my private life unsullied as an example to all, and will behave in a manner which does not bring discredit to me or my agency. I will maintain courageous calm in the face of danger, scorn, or ridicule; develop self-restraint; and be constantly mindful of the welfare of others. Honest in thought and deed in both my personal and official life, I will be exemplary in obeying the laws of the land and the regulations of my department. Whatever I see or hear of a confidential nature or that is confided to me in my official capacity will be kept ever secret unless revelation is necessary in the performance of my duty.” “I will never act officiously or permit personal feelings, prejudices, political beliefs, aspirations, animosities or friendships to influence my decisions. With no compromise for crime and with relentless prosecution of criminals, I will enforce the law courteously and appropriately
    [Show full text]
  • Equitable Development: the Path to an All-In Pittsburgh Acknowledgments
    Equitable Development: The Path to an All-In Pittsburgh Acknowledgments Many thanks to the core project team for their hard work and valuable contributions to this report, including Presley Gillespie, Shad Henderson, and Doni Crawford of Neighbor- hood Allies; Bill Generett, Marteen Garay, and James Myers of Urban Innovation21; Jamil Bey and Tayler Clemm of the UrbanKind Institute; and Angela Glover Blackwell, Rosa Carrillo, Shaibya Dalal, Heather Tamir, and Chris Schildt of PolicyLink. The entire team is grateful to the more than 200 local leaders who supported and informed this report by participating in interviews or attending workshops to help us craft the defi­ nition of equitable development and shape our recommen- dations. We thank The Heinz Endowments for supporting this work and promoting the vision of a Just Pittsburgh, and we thank the national funders of our All-In Cities initiative: Prudential, the Surdna Foundation, and the JPMorgan Chase Foundation. We also thank Mayor William Peduto and his staff including Kevin Acklin, Kyle Chintalapalli, Grant Ervin, and LaTrenda Sherrill, and former staff member Betty Cruz, for their support of this project, including helping us convene roundtables with local developers and organizations working with the Latino, immigrant, and refugee communities through the Welcoming Pittsburgh effort. ©2016 PolicyLink. All rights reserved. PolicyLink is a national research and action institute advancing economic and social equity by Lifting Up What Works®. Through the All-In Cities initiative, we equip city leaders with policy ideas, data, and strategy to make racial economic inclusion and equitable growth their reality. www.policylink.org Neighborhood Allies supports the people, organizations and partnerships committed to creating and maintaining thriving neighborhoods.
    [Show full text]
  • An Empirical Review of Pattern Or Practice Police Misconduct Reform
    Evaluating Section 14141: An Empirical Review of Pattern or Practice Police Misconduct Reform Joshua Chanin Section 14141 of the Violent Crime Act of 1994 fundamentally restructures the regulation of police behavior in the United States. Since the law’s passage, dozens of police departments have undergone lengthy and complex reforms designed to eliminate a pattern or practice of misconduct. Despite the program’s wide application, neither scholars nor practitioners know much about the efficacy or sustainability of these reforms. This paper draws on longitudinal data across several outcome metrics, including citizen complaints, use of force incidence, and civil litigation, and a series of interviews with key stakeholders to examine pattern or practice initiatives in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Washington, D.C., Cincinnati, Ohio, Prince George’s County, Maryland, and Los Angeles, California. Findings suggest that the reform process has the ability to minimize unwanted police misconduct and generate desirable policy outcomes, particularly during the period of Department of Justice (DOJ) oversight. Sustaining these reforms after the settlement agreement is dissolved, however, has proved a challenge. “We don’t tend to evaluate . after we have left.” - Vanita Gupta1 I. INTRODUCTION On May 26, 2015, Vanita Gupta, Head of the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Special Litigation Section (SPL), announced an agreement between the DOJ and the City of Cleveland, Ohio. Seven months earlier, Tamir Rice, an unarmed twelve-year-old Black boy was shot and killed by the Cleveland Division of Police (CDP) in an incident that quickly came to symbolize the tension between the CDP Assistant Professor in the School of Public Affairs, San Diego State University.
    [Show full text]
  • Jason Lando Oakland Police Chief – Candidate Supplemental Questions for Public Release October 29Th, 2020
    Jason Lando Oakland Police Chief – Candidate Supplemental questions for public release October 29th, 2020 Please explain how you embody being a reform-minded leader, able to rebuild trust and nurture legitimacy by actively seeking to modernize the policing model, embracing and advancing the principles of procedural justice. In 2014, I was selected by then-Pittsburgh Police Chief Cameron McLay to serve as one of the Police Bureau’s representatives in the National Initiative for Building Community Trust & Justice. As part of Pittsburgh’s involvement in this initiative, my team designed and implemented a 3-year training initiative in the areas of procedural justice, de-escalation, and implicit bias for all 1,000 Pittsburgh Police officers. To be transparent about what we were teaching our officers, our team also designed a community version of the training. The community training continues today and brings officers and citizens together for daylong workshops that help break down the barriers that often exist between the two. Late in 2014, I was promoted to the rank of Commander and assigned to the Zone 6 police station in the West End of the city. Zone 6 had a low violent crime rate and a high level of community engagement and trust. Conversely, the Zone 5 police station in the East End of the city was well known for its disproportionate amount of violent crime, a number of high profile incidents between police and residents, lack of meaningful community engagement, and low officer morale. I previously worked in Zone 5 as a Sergeant and then as a Lieutenant, so I was keenly aware of the challenges.
    [Show full text]