Water Requirements Study of the Nevada Test and Training Range

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Water Requirements Study of the Nevada Test and Training Range NEVADA TEST AND TRAINING RANGE (NTTR) Land Withdrawal Application Packages/ Case File and Legislative EIS WATER REQUIREMENTS STUDY OF THE NEVADA TEST AND TRAINING RANGE FINAL March 2017 FINAL WATER REQUIREMENTS STUDY OF THE NEVADA TEST AND TRAINING RANGE (NTTR) MARCH 2017 FINAL Water Resources Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.1 NEVADA TEST AND TRAINING RANGE ................................................................................ 12 2.2 PURPOSE OF THE STUDY ..................................................................................................... 12 3.1 CURRENT WITHDRAWN AREA .............................................................................................. 15 3.1.1 North Range ........................................................................................................................ 17 3.1.2 South Range ....................................................................................................................... 17 3.2 EXPANSION AREAS ................................................................................................................ 18 4.1 ABOUT WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN NEVADA ................................................... 24 4.1.1 Brief Introduction to Nevada Water Law ............................................................................. 24 4.1.2 Water Rights Terminology ................................................................................................... 25 4.1.3 Groundwater Management ................................................................................................. 26 4.1.4 Surface Water Management ............................................................................................... 29 4.2 INFORMATION SOURCES AND PROJECT APPROACH ...................................................... 29 4.3 HYDROGEOLOGIC SETTING OF THE NTTR ........................................................................ 31 4.4 HYDROGRAPHIC UNITS OF THE NTTR ................................................................................ 35 5.1 HYDROGEOLOGIC SYSTEMS ................................................................................................ 38 5.1.1 Groundwater Occurrence and Flow .................................................................................... 38 5.1.2 Groundwater Quality ........................................................................................................... 39 5.2 GROUNDWATER QUANTITY, RIGHTS, AND USE ON THE NTTR ....................................... 42 5.2.1 Basin 141 – Ralston Valley ................................................................................................. 46 5.2.2 Basin 144 – Lida Valley ....................................................................................................... 47 5.2.3 Basin 145 – Stonewall Flat .................................................................................................. 48 5.2.4 Basin 146 – Sarcobatus Flat ............................................................................................... 49 5.2.5 Basin 147 – Gold Flat .......................................................................................................... 50 5.2.6 Basin 148 – Cactus Flat ...................................................................................................... 52 5.2.7 Basin 149 – Stone Cabin Valley .......................................................................................... 54 5.2.8 Basin 157 – Kawich Valley .................................................................................................. 56 5.2.9 Basin 158A – Emigrant Valley-Groom Lake Valley ............................................................. 57 5.2.10 Basin 158B – Emigrant Valley-Papoose Lake Valley ......................................................... 58 5.2.11 Basin 159 – Yucca Flat ....................................................................................................... 59 5.2.12 Basin 160 – Frenchman Flat ............................................................................................... 59 5.2.13 Basin 161 – Indian Springs Valley ...................................................................................... 60 5.2.14 Basin 168 – Three Lakes Valley (Northern Part) ................................................................ 65 5.2.15 Basin 169A – Tikapoo Valley (Northern Part) ..................................................................... 66 5.2.16 Basin 169B – Tikapoo Valley (Southern Part) .................................................................... 67 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 FINAL Water Resources Report 5.2.17 Basin 170 – Penoyer Valley (Sand Spring Valley) .............................................................. 69 5.2.18 Basin 173A – Railroad Valley (Southern) ........................................................................... 70 5.2.19 Basin 209 – Pahranagat Valley ........................................................................................... 71 5.2.20 Basin 210 – Coyote Spring Valley....................................................................................... 72 5.2.21 Basin 211 – Three Lakes Valley (Southern Part) ................................................................ 73 5.2.22 Basin 212 – Las Vegas Valley ............................................................................................ 76 5.2.23 Basin 225 – Mercury Valley ................................................................................................ 78 5.2.24 Basin 227A – Fortymile Canyon – Jackass Flats ................................................................ 78 5.2.25 Basin 227B – Fortymile Canyon – Buckboard Mesa .......................................................... 79 5.2.26 Basin 228 – Oasis Valley .................................................................................................... 79 5.2.27 Basin 229 – Crater Flat ....................................................................................................... 82 5.3 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................ 83 6.1 HYDROLOGIC SETTING ......................................................................................................... 85 6.1.1 Surface Water Occurrence and Flow .................................................................................. 85 6.1.2 Surface Water Quality ......................................................................................................... 85 6.2 SURFACE WATER QUANTITY, RIGHTS, AND USE ON THE NTTR..................................... 85 6.2.1 Basin 141 – Ralston Valley ................................................................................................. 90 6.2.2 Basin 144 – Lida Valley ....................................................................................................... 90 6.2.3 Basin 145 – Stonewall Flat .................................................................................................. 90 6.2.4 Basin 146 – Sarcobatus Flat ............................................................................................... 91 6.2.5 Basin 147 – Gold Flat .......................................................................................................... 92 6.2.6 Basin 148 – Cactus Flat ...................................................................................................... 92 6.2.7 Basin 149 – Stone Cabin Valley .......................................................................................... 94 6.2.8 Basin 157 – Kawich Valley .................................................................................................. 94 6.2.9 Basin 158A – Emigrant Valley – Groom Lake Valley .......................................................... 96 6.2.10 Basin 158B – Emigrant Valley – Papoose Lake Valley ...................................................... 96 6.2.11 Basin 159 – Yucca Flat ....................................................................................................... 97 6.2.12 Basin 160 – Frenchman Flat ............................................................................................... 97 6.2.13 Basin 161 – Indian Springs Valley ...................................................................................... 97 6.2.14 Basin 168 – Three Lakes Valley (Northern Part) ................................................................ 98 6.2.15 Basin 169A – Tikapoo Valley (Northern Part) ..................................................................... 98 6.2.16 Basin 169B – Tikapoo Valley (Southern Part) .................................................................... 99 6.2.17 Basin 170 – Penoyer Valley (Sand Spring Valley) ............................................................ 100 6.2.18 Basin 173A – Railroad Valley (Southern Part) .................................................................. 101 6.2.19 Basin 209 – Pahranagat Valley ......................................................................................... 101 6.2.20 Basin 210 – Coyote Spring Valley..................................................................................... 102 6.2.21 Basin 211 – Three Lakes Valley (Southern Part) .............................................................. 102 6.2.22 Basin 212 – Las Vegas Valley .......................................................................................... 102 6.2.23 Basin 225 – Mercury Valley
Recommended publications
  • Plate 1 117° 116°
    U.S. Department of the Interior Prepared in cooperation with the Scientific Investigations Report 2015–5175 U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of Energy Plate 1 117° 116° Monitor Range White River Valley Hot Creek Valley 5,577 (1,700) Warm Springs Railroad Valley 6 5,000 4,593 (1,400) Stone Cabin Valley Quinn Canyon Range Tonopah 5,577 (1,700) Ralston Valley NYE COUNTY 4,921 (1,500) LINCOLN COUNTY Big Smoky Valley 5,249 (1,600) 38° 38° 5,906 (1,800) 5,249 (1,600) Ralston Valley Coal Valley 5,249 (1,600) Kawich Range 4,265 (1,300) 4,921 (1,500) 5,249 (1,600) 6,234 (1,900) 5,577 (1,700) 4,921 (1,500) Railroad Valley South CACTUS FLAT 5,200 | 200 Cactus Range Penoyer Valley Goldfield 5,249 (1,600) 3,800 | 3,800 4,921 (1,500) Clayton Valley 3,609 (1,100) Rachel Sand Spring Valley 5,249 (1,600) 5,577 (1,700) Sarcobatus Flat North Kawich Valley 4,593 (1,400) 5,600 | 5,600 93 Pahranagat Valley 4,921 4,593 (1,400) 4,593 (1,400)5,249 3,937 (1,200)4,265 (1,300) Gold Flat Pahranagat Range 4,921 (1,500) Pahute Mesa–Oasis Valley 6,300 | 5,900 Belted Range Alamo 4,265 (1,300) 4,593 (1,400) 3,609 (1,100) Scottys Emigrant Valley Junction Black Pahute Mesa Nevada National Mountain Security Site 3,281 (1,000) NYE COUNTY Sarcobatus Flat ESMERALDA COUNTY ESMERALDA Rainier Mesa 3,937 (1,200) Yucca Flat Timber Death Valley North Mountain 4,000 | 4,000 Yucca Flat Sarcobatus Flat South Oasis Valley subbasin Grapevine 37° 37° Springs area 1,900 | 1,900 4,265 Grapevine Mountains Bullfrog Hills 2,297 (700) 100 | 100 3,937 (1,200) Ash Meadows 20,50020,500 |
    [Show full text]
  • USGS-OFR-91-367, "Seismicity and Focal Mechanisms for the Southern Great Basin of Nevada and California in 1990."
    bf/w4E? P~? USGS-OFR-91-367 USGS-OFR-91-367 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SEISMICITY AND FOCAL MECHANISMS FOR THE SOUTHERN GREAT BASIN OF NEVADA AND CALIFORNIA IN 1990 by S. C. Harmsen Open-File Report 91-367 Prepared In cooperation with the Nevada Operations Office U.S. Department of Energy (Interagency Agreement DE-AI08-78ET44802) This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. Company names are for descriptive purposes only and do not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. Denver, Colorado 1991 USGS-OFR-91-367 USGS-OFR-91-367 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Denver, Colorado SEISMICITY AND FOCAL MECHANISMS FOR THE SOUTHERN GREAT BASIN OF NEVADA AND CALIFORNIA IN 1990 - Stephen C. Harmsen Open-File Report 91-367 Copies of this Open-File Report may be purchased from Books and Open-File Reports Section Branch of Distribution U.S. Geological Survey Box 25425, Federal Center Denver, Colorado 80225 PREPAYMENT IS REQUIRED Price information will be published in the monthly listing 'New Publications of the Geological Survey" FOR ADDITIONAL ORDERING INFORMATION CALL: Commercial: (303) 236-5456 FTS: 776-5456 CONTENTS Page Abstract----------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Introduction------------------------------------------------------------- I Acknowledgements--------------------------------------------------------- 1 Calibrations of instruments----------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • NTTR Commission Decision
    Case 2:15-cv-01743-MMD-NJK Document 656 Filed 05/29/20 Page 1 of 43 1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 2:15-cv-01743-MMD-NJK 6 Plaintiff, 7 v. COMMISSION’S FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 8 400 ACRES OF LAND, more or less, 9 situate in Lincoln County, State of Nevada; and JESSIE J. COX, et al., 10 11 Defendants. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Case 2:15-cv-01743-MMD-NJK Document 656 Filed 05/29/20 Page 2 of 43 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 I. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................3 3 II. FINDINGS OF FACT .........................................................................................................5 4 A. Joint Pretrial Order ..........................................................................................................5 5 B. Commissions Finding Of Fact .........................................................................................9 6 7 III. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ........................................................................................... 15 8 A. Landowners’ Proposed Large-Scale Tourism Use was Speculative, Not Reasonably 9 Probable, at the Date of Value ............................................................................................... 16 10 1. Demand Requires Consideration of Price ................................................................. 21 11 2. Mr. DiFederico Otherwise Did Not Support His $400 Entrance Fee
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Geology and Hydrology of Death Valley National Park
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Groundwater Geology and Hydrology of Death Valley National Park, California and Nevada Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NRSS/WRD/NRTR—2012/652 ON THE COVER The Amargosa River in the southeast part of Death Valley National Park during a flash flood in February 2005 Photography by: A. Van Luik Groundwater Geology and Hydrology of Death Valley National Park, California and Nevada Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NRSS/WRD/NRTR—2012/652 M. S. Bedinger Hydrologist U.S. Geological Survey, Retired Carlsborg, WA J. R. Harrill Hydrologist U.S. Geological Survey, Retired Carson City, NV December 2012 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and envi- ronmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series provides contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scien- tifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and pub- lished in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Geohydrology of Monitoring Wells Drilled in Oasis Valley Near Beatty, Nye County, Nevada, 1997
    U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Geohydrology of Monitoring Wells Drilled in Oasis Valley near Beatty, Nye County, Nevada, 1997 Water-Resources Investigations Report 98-4184 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Nevada Operations Office, under Interagency Agreement DE-AI08-96NV11967 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Geohydrology of Monitoring Wells Drilled in Oasis Valley near Beatty, Nye County, Nevada, 1997 By Armando R. Robledo, Philip L. Ryder, Joseph M. Fenelon, and Frederick L. Paillet Water-Resources Investigations Report 98-4184 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Nevada Operations Office, under Interagency Agreement DE-AI08-96NV11967 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY THOMAS J. CASADEVALL, Acting Director Any use of trade names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Government For additional information Copies of this report can be contact: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 333 West Nye Lane, Room 203 Box 25286 Carson City, NV 89706-0866 Denver, CO 80225-0286 email: [email protected] http://nevada.usgs.gov CONTENTS Abstract.................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction...........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Townn of F Bea Atty Y Are Ea P Plan
    Town of Beatty Area Plan Gateway to Death Valley May 12, 2014 Page Town of Beatty Area Plan – 5/12/2014 THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY Cover photo “Beatty from Beatty Mountain courtesy of Richard Stephens. Page | i Town of Beatty Area Plan — 5/12/2014 /// Town of Beatty Area Plan — 5/12/2014 Town of Beatty Area Plan – 5/12/2014 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS NYE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Lorinda Wichman, Vice-Chairman District 1 Frank Carbone District 2 Donna Cox District 3 Andrew “Butch” Borasky District 4 Dan Schinhofen, Chairman District 5 BEATTY AREA PLAN STEERING COMMITTEE Dick Gardner Shirley Harlan Ann Marchand Randy Reed Gary Reid Teresa Sullivan Ryan Tweney La Rene Younghans BEATTY TOWN ADVISORY BOARD Dick Gardner, Chair Kelly Carroll, Vice Chair Erika Gerling, Treasurer Crystal Taylor – Member Randy Reed – Member Carrie Radomski - Secretary THE FOLLOWING ARE GRATEFULLY ACKNOWLEDGED FOR THEIR CONTRIBUTIONS TO THIS PLAN: Cheryl Beeman, Nye County Planning TerraSpectra Geomatics, mapping and report compilation Joni Eastley, Assistant Nye County Manager Brent Farr, Farr West Engineering Joanie Jarvis – Past Beatty Town Advisory Board member Justin LaPorte, Past Vice Chair Beatty Town Advisory Board Suzy McCoy, Beatty History and Preservation Information Ingrid McKagan, Farr West Engineering Kitty Shubert – Past Beatty Town Advisory Board member Richard Stephens, Photography Lamar Walters – Past Beatty Town Advisory Board member Beatty Water & Sanitation District Nye County Nuclear Waste Repository Project Office The steering committee would like to give special recognition to the late Bert Bertram for his invaluable contributions to this plan and to the Beatty community. Page | iv Town of Beatty Area Plan – 5/12/2014 THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY Page | v Town of Beatty Area Plan – 5/12/2014 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Beatty is an unincorporated town located in the southern portion of Nye County, Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Evaluation of the Oasis Valley Basin, Nye County, Nevada
    U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U, S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Geologic evaluation of the Oasis Valley basin, Nye County, Nevada by: C. J. Fridrich’, S. A. Minor’, and E. A. Mankinen2 1 USGS, Denver, CO 2 USGS, Menlo Park, CA Open-File Report 99-533-A Prepared in cooperation with the U. S. Depatfment of Energy This reportis preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformitywith U. S. Geological Survey editorial standards (or with the North American Stratigraphic Code). Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes and does not imply endorsement by the U. S. Geological Survey. 1999 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, make any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency. thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. INTRODUCTION This report documents the results of a geologic study of the area between the underground- nuclear-explosion testing areas on Pahute Mesa, in the northwesternmost part of the Nevada Test Site, and the springs in Oasis Valley, to the west of the Test Site.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground-Water Discharge Determined from Estimates of Evapotranspiration, Death Valley Regional Flflowow System, Nnevadaevada and Californiacalifornia
    U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Ground-Water Discharge Determined from Estimates of Evapotranspiration, Death Valley Regional FlFlowow System, NNevadaevada and CaliCaliforniafornia Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4195 Prepared in cooperation with the OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND WASTE MANAGEMENT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Operations Office, under Interagency Agreement DE-AI08-96NV11967 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Ground-Water Discharge Determined from Estimates of Evapotranspiration, Death Valley Regional Flow System, Nevada and California By Randell J. Laczniak, J. LaRue Smith, Peggy E. Elliott, Guy A. DeMeo, and Melissa A. Chatigny, U.S. Geological Survey; and Gaius J. Roemer, GeoTrans Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4195 Prepared in cooperation with the OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND WASTE MANAGEMENT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Operations Office, under Interagency Agreement DE-AI08-96NV11967 Carson City, Nevada 2001 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES G. GROAT, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government For additional information contact: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey 333 West Nye Lane, Room 203 Carson City, NV 89706–0866 email: [email protected] http://nevada.usgs.gov CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Mojave Desert Vista
    Chapter Two — Landscape Design Segments Landscape Design Segments TABLE of CONTENTS Section One: Highway Zones .............................................................................. 2.3 Section Two: Mojave Desert Vista ..................................................................2.15 Section Three: Silver Legends ...........................................................................2.22 Section Four : Great Basin Oasis ......................................................................2.34 Section Five: Pony Express Passage ...............................................................2.49 UNLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE & PLANNINGLV RESEARCH Introduction Chapter Two — Landscape Design Segments INTRODUCTION be further divided into highway zones. These cat- nity interface zone. Within this zone, traffic-calm- COMPREHENSIVE DESIGN CONCEPT egories establish program elements and goals that ing techniques are appropriate and pedestrian needs This chapter establishes the design direction for should always be considered when addressing proj- dominate. As communities develop and adjacent land The corridor design concept can be articulated highway landscape and aesthetics. The chapter is ects located along roads with similar characteristics uses change, the highway zone associated with the for both rural and urban segments. In rural organized into five sections. The first section de- (downtowns, transition areas, etc.). new land use and development can be updated. Fig- or predominately undeveloped areas, the scribes program elements
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Bullfrog Quadrangle and Ore Deposits Related to Bullfrog Hills Caldera, Nye County, Nevada and Inyo County, California
    Geology of Bullfrog Quadrangle and Ore Deposits Related to Bullfrog Hills Caldera, Nye County, Nevada and Inyo County, California By HENRY R. CORNWALL and FRANK J. KLEINHAMPL SHORTER CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 454-J Prepared in cooperation with the Nevada Bureau of Mines UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1964 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract._ _________________________________________ Jl Cenozoic rocks and volcanism Continued Introduction.______________________________________ 1 Bullfrog Hills caldera and associated rocks Con. Precambrian rocks._________________________________ 1 Chemical composition of the rocks ____________ J13 Paleozoic rocks_____________________________________ 1 Older gravels_________________________________ 15 Daylight Formation.____________________________ 2 Recent alluvium._______________________________ 15 Age and correlation.________________________ 2 Structure ___________________________-___---__-----_ 15 Corkscrew Quartzite.___________________________ 3 Tectonic deformation____________________________ 15 Age and correlation.________________________ 3 Relation to Walker Lane and Las Vegas Valley Carrara Formation____________________________ 4 shear zone_______________________________ 17 Nopah Formation_____________________________ 4 Basin-range
    [Show full text]
  • Ground-Water Resources Reconnaissance Series Report
    - t--...-...DEPAIITMEtki-c.- AN'i;-)tiAT-URAL Hv.~-ls RESOU;RCES *~~~~~ ' ' '~ '#' < * 'J - trap': 04:W W~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ . * .~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~V NYE~ ~ ~ ~~4tCi1TS;d ;s3SERL NEAZ. U Aeia iew S1ofetyNvd JULYR S61 a-,) Viewsouthwes 9 . fromT . * . - *. .t . K d , ', :: _:' '-, ; *- -:......w:- . ._ -hic:b.n th s:the: sid of Sarcbatu -:la:. ight cove of :s,.ow wh iewbn sothw ouhest omT9S.side45 Sarobu towat.Ld GaevierMouftsnswh (April 1962) lies above an altitude of 5,200 feet. Foreground shows very'low density of southern margin of phreatophyte area. 4.i - * <: -.............w ' . - :? CORRECTIONS TO: Ground-Water Resources - Reconnaissance Series, Report 10 "Ground-Water Appraisal of Sarcobatus Flat and Oasis Valley, Nye and Esmeralda Counties, Nevada" Please make the following corrections: Page 13 - Under heading - "SARCOBATUS FLAT" Sub-heading - "Source, Occurrence, and Movement of Ground Water": Line 2: Change page 17 to read page 9. Page 24 - Under sub-heading - "Estimated Average Annual Recharge": 3rd paragraph, line 4: Insert (p. 25-26). GROUND-WATER RESOURCES - RECONNAISSANCE SERIES Report 10 GROUND-VTATER APPRAISAL OF SARCOBATUS FLAT AND OASIS VALLEY, NYE AND ESMERALDA COUNTIES, NEVADA by Glenn T. Malmberg and Thomas E. Eakin Geologists Prepared cooperatively by the Geological Survey, U. S. Department of the Interior June 1962 F OREWORlD This is the tenth report in the current series of ground-water reconnaissance studies and covers the ground-water appraisal of Sarcobatus Flat and Oasis Valley in Nye and Esmeralda Counties., The study was made and report prepared by Glenn T. Malmberg and Thomas E. Eakin, Geologists, United States Geological Survey, Carson City, Nevada. Great interest is being shown by the public and many Federal and State agencies over this particular type of study.
    [Show full text]
  • Nevada Historical Society Quarterly
    Nevada Historical Society Quarterly SPRING 1996 NEVADA HISTORICAL SOCIETY QUARTERLY EDITORIAL BOARD Eugene Moehring, Chairman, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Marie Boutte, University of Nevada, Reno Robert Davenport, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Doris Dwyer, Western Nevada Community College Jerome E. Edwards, University of Nevada, Reno Candace C. Kant, Community College of Southern Nevada Guy Louis Rocha, Nevada State Library and Archives Willard H. Rollings, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Hal K. Rothman, University of Nevada, Las Vegas The Nevada Historical Society Quarterly solicits contributions of scholarly or popular interest dealing with the following subjects: the general (e.g., the political, social, economic, constitutional) or the natural history of Nevada and the Great Basin; the literature, languages, anthropology, and archaeology of these areas; reprints of historic documents; reviews and essays concerning the historical literature of Nevada, the Great Basin, and the West. Prospective authors should send their work to The Editor, Nevada Historical Society Quarterly, 1650 N. Virginia St., Reno, Nevada 89503. Papers should be typed double-spaced and sent in duplicate. All manuscripts, whether articles, edited documents, or essays, should conform to the most recent edition of the University of Chicago Press Mallual of Style. Footnotes should be typed double-spaced on separate pages and numbered consecutively. Correspondence concerning articles and essays is welcomed, and should be addressed to The Editor. © Copyright Nevada Historical Society, 1996. The Nevada Historical Society Quarterly (ISSN 0047-9462) is published quarterly by the Nevada Historical Society. The Quarterly is sent to all members of the Society. Membership dues are: Student, $15; Senior Citizen without Quarterly, $15; Regular, $25; Family, $35; Sustaining, $50; Contributing, $100; Departmental Fellow, $250; Patron, $500; Benefactor, $1,000.
    [Show full text]