Acute Isolated Pisiform Dislocation - a Case Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Acute Isolated Pisiform Dislocation - a Case Report 대한정형외과학회지:제 42 권제5 호 2007 J Korean Orthop Assoc 2007; 42: 688-691 Acute Isolated Pisiform Dislocation - A Case Report - Oh Soo Kwon, M.D., Seong Pil Choi, M.D., and Ho Yeon Won, M.D. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Daejeon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea 급성 단독 두상골 탈구 -증례 보고- 권오수ㆍ최성필ㆍ원호연 가톨릭대학교 의과대학 대전성모병원 정형외과 There are few reports of an isolated dislocation of the pisiform. An isolated dislocation of the pisiform without other injuries involving the carpal bones is particularly uncommon. This type of injury can be neglected in the acute period. We report a case of an isolated dislocation of the pisiform without a carpal bone injury in a young man treated primarily with a closed reduction, pinning and immobilization. Key Words: Pisiform, Dislocation Isolated dislocation of pisiform is rarely reported in the literature. Isolated dislocation of pisiform without other injuries involving carpal bones are especially uncommon. This type of injury could be neglected in acute period. We report a case of an isolated dislocation of the pisiform without carpal bone injuries. CASE REPORT A 20-year-old man suffered an injury to his left hand after falling down stairs. The radiographs revealed an isolated dislocation of the pisiform and associated injuries including an ipsilateral distal clavicle fracture and a contralateral intraarticular fracture of the metacarpal base of the thumb. Fig. 1. Plain radiograph of the left wrist shows a dislocation of Although the precise mechanism of injury was the pisiform with displacement. 통신저자:권 오 수 Address reprint requests to 대전광역시 중구 대흥동 520-2 Oh Soo Kwon, M.D. 대전성모병원 정형외과 Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, 520-2, Daeheung-dong, Jung-gu, Daejeon TEL: 042-220-9867,9530ㆍFAX: 042-221-0429 301-732, Korea E-mail: [email protected] Tel: +82.42-220-9867, 9530, Fax: +82.42-221-0429 E-mail: [email protected] 688 Acute Isolated Pisiform Dislocation 689 Fig. 2. Three dimensional reconstructed computed tomography shows the displacement of the pisiform viewing from the radius. Fig. 4. Radiographs of the left wrist at the immediate postoper- ative period shows a well reduced pisifom fixed with Kirschner wire into the triquetrum. Fig. 3. Axial view of computed tomography reveals widening of the pisotriquetral joint. Fig. 5. Radiographs taken 24 months after surgery shows a well unclear, he recalled suffering a direct blow to the reduced position of the pisiform. volar aspect of the wrist. A physical examination revealed tenderness over (computed tomography) showed no other injuries to the hypothenar eminence. The wrist motion was the bone and wrist but a displaced pisiform. restricted by pain and swelling. He did not have An arthroscopic examination of the wrist joint any history of ligament laxity. The neurovascular was performed under general anesthesia but did examination of ulnar artery and nerve was normal. not show any other intraarticular lesions. A closed The radiographs of the left wrist showed an reduction of the pisiform was attempted under a isolated dislocation of the pisiform towards the C-arm image intensifier. Direct pressure was ulnar with a separation of the pisotriquetral joint applied to relocate the bone with a slightly dorsi- in the palmar-dorsal supine position as well as a flexed position. However, stable reduction was not shift toward the dorsal in the lateral view. 3D CT maintained. Therefore, the pisiform was reduced 690 Oh Soo Kwon, Seong Pil Choi, Ho Yeon Won into its position and fixed to the triquetrum using dorsiflexion of the wrist joint with strong traction one Kirschner wire percutaneously. The wrist was by the FCU tendon. The pisotriquetral joint appe- immobilized with a long arm plaster splint in 25o ared to be wide on the radiographs and CT. of dorsiflexion for 3 weeks. The splint and kirsch- Treatment includes immobilization after a closed ner wire were removed 3 weeks later, at which time reduction, an open reduction with internal fixation physiotherapy and active exercise were initiated. and a resection of the pisiform4,5,9). Nonsurgical Eight weeks after surgery, the radiographs revea- treatment has been initially attempted in acute led the pisiform to have relocated to the correct cases3,8,10). Sharara et al10) recommended a closed position. At the 24 months follow-up, the patient reduction and immobilization. Kubiak3) suggested was clinically well without any pain or limitation that simple immobilization is justified in cases with of motion, and full recovery of his grip strength. isolated dislocation. There were some differences regarding the position of the wrist in immobiliz- DISCUSSION ation1,4,7,10). Ishizuki et al1) noted that a dislocation The pisiform bone lies in the proximal row of the and reduction of the pisiform is dependent on the carpal bones and articulates dorsally with the wrist position. Minami et al5) reported a redisloc- triquetrum. Because the pisiform has a flat arti- ation 3 months after immobilization in 20o palmar cular surface, it relies mainly on its many soft flexion of the wrist and the neutral position of tissue attachments for stability6), such as FCU forearm. Sharara et al10) suggested the forearm to (Flexor carpi ulnaris) tendon, ulnar pisotriquetral be in a full pronation position to maintain the FCU ligament, pisometacarapal and pisohamate liga- in the relaxed state. This allows the pisiform to ment being primary stabilizers of pisotriquetral stabilize in a normal orientation and prevent joint3,6). The pisotriquetral joint is tightly constr- redislocation. It is believed that in this case, stable ained by both the transverse carpal ligament and relocation was obtained in the slight extension ulnar collateral ligament. Because of the insertion position of the wrist in addition to percutaneous of all these structures, the pisiform is an important fixation to the triquetrum. stabilizing structure of the wrist and also acts as An open reduction and internal fixation of the a lever to provide extra stability when the wrist is pisiform might be employed in combined carpal flexed6). Immerman2) suggested two possible me- injurues5,9). Most authors favor an excision of the chanisms that may cause a dislocation of the dislocated pisiform bone either initially or second- pisiform: direct external force or traction by the arily in cases of persistent pain or recurrent FCU tendon. It appears that the latter mechanism dislocation because of rapid rehabilitation and occurs more often e.g. a fall on the hand with the recovery to normal function1,2,5). Ishizuki et al1) wrist in the dorsiflexed position at the moment of performed a resection of the pisiform 5 months impact or increase tension on the ligaments after the initial conservative treatment. Minami et attached to the pisiform while lifting heavy al5) inevitably resected the pisiform in the case of objects1). The normal force of this tendon tends to a redislocation followed by an open reduction and pull the pisiform proximally and medially, and internal fixation. Some authors suggested a pri- diagnostic radiography confirms that the bone to mary excision of the pisiform in acute disloc- be dislocated in this direction. In our case, the ation4,7). Therefore, a surgical resection is recom- dislocation appeared to be secondary to acute mended if recurrent dislocations occur or the Acute Isolated Pisiform Dislocation 691 disability remains after conservative treatment. An 4. McCarron RF, Coleman W: Dislocation of the pisiform isolated dislocation of the pisiform can be neglected treated by primary resection. A case report. Clin Orthop Relat in cases associated with multiple injuries in the Res, 241: 231-233, 1989. upper extremities. A high index of suspicion is 5. Minami M, Yamazaki J, Ishii S: Isolated dislocation of the required to identify this type of injury in traumatic pisiform: a case report and review of the literature. J Hand patients. It is believed that our technique is an Surg Am, 9: 125-127, 1984. effective and reliable method for treating a 6. Moojen TM, Snel JG, Ritt MJ, Venema HW, den Heeten dislocated pisiform. GJ, Bos KE: Pisiform kinematics in vivo. J Hand Surg Am, 26: 901-907, 2001. REFERENCES 7. Muñiz AE: Unusual wrist pain: pisiform dislocation and 1. Ishizuki M, Nakagawa T, Itoh S, Furuya K: Positional fracture. Am J Emerg Med, 17: 78-79, 1999. dislocation of the pisiform. J Hand Surg Am, 16: 533-535, 8. Sundaram M, Shively R, Patel B, Tayob A: Isolated 1991. dislocation of the pisiform. Br J Radiol, 53: 911-912, 1980. 2. Immermann EW: Dislocation of the pisiform. J Bone Joint 9. Schädel-Höpfner M, Böhringer G, Junge A: Dislocation Surg Am, 30: 489-492, 1948. of the pisiform bone after severe crush injury to the hand. 3. Kubiak R, Slongo T, Tschäppeler H: Isolated dislocation Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg, 37: 252-255, 2003. of the pisifrom: an unusal injury during a cartwheel maneuver. 10. Sharara KH, Farrar M: Isolated dislocation of the pisiform J Trauma, 51: 788-789, 2001. bone. J Hand Surg Br, 18: 195-196, 1993. = 국문초록 = 단독 두상골 탈구는 매우 드문 병변으로서 문헌보고를 찾기 쉽지 않다. 대부분의 경우 동측 수근골 및 관절 또는 전완부와 완관절에 심한 손상을 동반하므로 처음 손상의 발생시에 간과되기 쉽다. 따라서 진단과 치료에 관심과 주의를 기울여야 할 것으로 생각된다. 상지 다발성 손상과 동반된 두상골 탈구에서 도수 정복과 경피적 고정술을 시행한 1예를 보고하고자 한다. 핵심 단어: 두상골, 탈구.
Recommended publications
  • Upper Extremity Injuries in Pediatric Athletes
    Review Article Page 1 of 10 Upper extremity injuries in pediatric athletes Kristen M. Sochol, Daniel A. Charen, Jaehon Kim Department of Orthopedics at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA Contributions: (I) Conception and design: All authors; (II) Administrative support: All authors; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: All authors; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: All authors; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: All authors; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors. Correspondence to: Kristen M. Sochol, MD. Department of Orthopedics at Mount Sinai Hospital, 5E 98th St, New York, NY 10029, USA. Email: [email protected]. Abstract: Upper extremity injuries in the pediatric patient are common, but are often more difficult to diagnose compared to their adult counterparts due to the gradual progression of cartilage ossification. Common pediatric upper extremity injuries include fractures and soft tissue trauma. Less prevalent injuries include sport specific overuse injuries. Fractures in the pediatric population are best described using the Salter-Harris classification, which has management and prognostic implications. Most pediatric upper extremity injuries can be managed with an initial trial of immobilization and early range of motion, followed by surgical intervention if necessary. Children have a robust healing response to bony and soft tissue injuries, and have good outcomes with appropriate management. Keywords: Pediatric athletes; upper extremity; Salter-Harris; overuse; injury Received: 14 February 2018; Accepted: 08 May 2018; Published: 15 May 2018. doi: 10.21037/aoj.2018.05.04 View this article at: http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/aoj.2018.05.04 Introduction joints are constrained by a network of ligaments that are primarily named after their attachment sites.
    [Show full text]
  • REVIEW ARTICLE Osteoarthritis of the Wrist
    REVIEW ARTICLE Osteoarthritis of the Wrist Krista E. Weiss, Craig M. Rodner, MD From Harvard College, Cambridge, MA and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT. Osteoarthritis of the wrist is one of the most common conditions encountered by hand surgeons. It may result from a nonunited or malunited fracture of the scaphoid or distal radius; disruption of the intercarpal, radiocarpal, radioulnar, or ulnocarpal ligaments; avascular necrosis of the carpus; or a developmental abnormality. Whatever the cause, subsequent abnormal joint loading produces a spectrum of symptoms, from mild swelling to considerable pain and limitations of motion as the involved joints degenerate. A meticulous clinical and radiographic evaluation is required so that the pain-generating articulation(s) can be identi- fied and eliminated. This article reviews common causes of wrist osteoarthritis and their surgical treatment alternatives. (J Hand Surg 2007;32A:725–746. Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand.) Key words: Wrist, osteoarthritis, arthrodesis, carpectomy, SLAC. here are several different causes, both idio- of events is analogous to SLAC wrist and has pathic and traumatic, of wrist osteoarthritis. been termed scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse Untreated cases of idiopathic carpal avascular (SNAC). Wrist osteoarthritis can also occur second- T 1 2 necrosis, as in Kienböck’s or Preiser’s disease, may ary to an intra-articular fracture of the distal radius or result in radiocarpal arthritis. Congenital wrist abnor- ulna or from an extra-articular fracture resulting in malities, such as Madelung’s deformity,3,4 can lead malunion and abnormal joint loading.
    [Show full text]
  • Trapezius Origin: Occipital Bone, Ligamentum Nuchae & Spinous Processes of Thoracic Vertebrae Insertion: Clavicle and Scapul
    Origin: occipital bone, ligamentum nuchae & spinous processes of thoracic vertebrae Insertion: clavicle and scapula (acromion Trapezius and scapular spine) Action: elevate, retract, depress, or rotate scapula upward and/or elevate clavicle; extend neck Origin: spinous process of vertebrae C7-T1 Rhomboideus Insertion: vertebral border of scapula Minor Action: adducts & performs downward rotation of scapula Origin: spinous process of superior thoracic vertebrae Rhomboideus Insertion: vertebral border of scapula from Major spine to inferior angle Action: adducts and downward rotation of scapula Origin: transverse precesses of C1-C4 vertebrae Levator Scapulae Insertion: vertebral border of scapula near superior angle Action: elevates scapula Origin: anterior and superior margins of ribs 1-8 or 1-9 Insertion: anterior surface of vertebral Serratus Anterior border of scapula Action: protracts shoulder: rotates scapula so glenoid cavity moves upward rotation Origin: anterior surfaces and superior margins of ribs 3-5 Insertion: coracoid process of scapula Pectoralis Minor Action: depresses & protracts shoulder, rotates scapula (glenoid cavity rotates downward), elevates ribs Origin: supraspinous fossa of scapula Supraspinatus Insertion: greater tuberacle of humerus Action: abduction at the shoulder Origin: infraspinous fossa of scapula Infraspinatus Insertion: greater tubercle of humerus Action: lateral rotation at shoulder Origin: clavicle and scapula (acromion and adjacent scapular spine) Insertion: deltoid tuberosity of humerus Deltoid Action:
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomy and Physiology II
    Anatomy and Physiology II Review Bones of the Upper Extremities Muscles of the Upper Extremities Anatomy and Physiology II Review Bones of the Upper Extremities Questions From Shoulder Girdle Lecture • Can you name the following structures? A – F • Acromion F – B B • Spine of the Scapula G – C • Medial (Vertebral) Border H – E C • Lateral (Axillary) Border – A • Superior Angle E I – D • Inferior Angle – G • Head of the Humerus D – H • Greater Tubercle of Humerus – I • Deltoid Tuberosity Questions From Shoulder Girdle Lecture • Would you be able to find the many of the same landmarks on this view (angles, borders, etc)? A • Can you name the following? – D • Coracoid process of scapula C – C D B • Lesser Tubercle – A • Greater Tubercle – B • Bicipital Groove (Intertubercular groove) Questions From Upper Extremities Lecture • Can you name the following structures? – B • Lateral epicondyle – A • Medial epicondyle A B Questions From Upper Extremities Lecture • Can you name the following landmarks? – C • Olecranon process – A • Head of the radius – B D • Medial epicondyle B A – D C • Lateral epicondyle Questions From Upper Extremities Lecture • Can you name the following bones and landmarks? – Which bone is A pointing to? • Ulna – Which bone is B pointing A to? • Radius E – C B • Styloid process of the ulna – D • Styloid process of the radius C – E D • Interosseous membrane of forearm Questions From Upper Extremities Lecture • Can you name the following bony landmarks? – Which landmark is A pointing to? • Lateral epicondyle of humerus – Which
    [Show full text]
  • The Appendicular Skeleton the Appendicular Skeleton
    The Appendicular Skeleton Figure 8–1 The Appendicular Skeleton • Allows us to move and manipulate objects • Includes all bones besides axial skeleton: – the limbs – the supportive girdles 1 The Pectoral Girdle Figure 8–2a The Pectoral Girdle • Also called the shoulder girdle • Connects the arms to the body • Positions the shoulders • Provides a base for arm movement 2 The Clavicles Figure 8–2b, c The Clavicles • Also called collarbones • Long, S-shaped bones • Originate at the manubrium (sternal end) • Articulate with the scapulae (acromial end) The Scapulae Also called shoulder blades Broad, flat triangles Articulate with arm and collarbone 3 The Scapula • Anterior surface: the subscapular fossa Body has 3 sides: – superior border – medial border (vertebral border) – lateral border (axillary border) Figure 8–3a Structures of the Scapula Figure 8–3b 4 Processes of the Glenoid Cavity • Coracoid process: – anterior, smaller •Acromion: – posterior, larger – articulates with clavicle – at the acromioclavicular joint Structures of the Scapula • Posterior surface Figure 8–3c 5 Posterior Features of the Scapula • Scapular spine: – ridge across posterior surface of body • Separates 2 regions: – supraspinous fossa – infraspinous fossa The Humerus Figure 8–4 6 Humerus • Separated by the intertubercular groove: – greater tubercle: • lateral • forms tip of shoulder – lesser tubercle: • anterior, medial •Head: – rounded, articulating surface – contained within joint capsule • Anatomical neck: – margin of joint capsule • Surgical neck: – the narrow
    [Show full text]
  • Section 1 Upper Limb Anatomy 1) with Regard to the Pectoral Girdle
    Section 1 Upper Limb Anatomy 1) With regard to the pectoral girdle: a) contains three joints, the sternoclavicular, the acromioclavicular and the glenohumeral b) serratus anterior, the rhomboids and subclavius attach the scapula to the axial skeleton c) pectoralis major and deltoid are the only muscular attachments between the clavicle and the upper limb d) teres major provides attachment between the axial skeleton and the girdle 2) Choose the odd muscle out as regards insertion/origin: a) supraspinatus b) subscapularis c) biceps d) teres minor e) deltoid 3) Which muscle does not insert in or next to the intertubecular groove of the upper humerus? a) pectoralis major b) pectoralis minor c) latissimus dorsi d) teres major 4) Identify the incorrect pairing for testing muscles: a) latissimus dorsi – abduct to 60° and adduct against resistance b) trapezius – shrug shoulders against resistance c) rhomboids – place hands on hips and draw elbows back and scapulae together d) serratus anterior – push with arms outstretched against a wall 5) Identify the incorrect innervation: a) subclavius – own nerve from the brachial plexus b) serratus anterior – long thoracic nerve c) clavicular head of pectoralis major – medial pectoral nerve d) latissimus dorsi – dorsal scapular nerve e) trapezius – accessory nerve 6) Which muscle does not extend from the posterior surface of the scapula to the greater tubercle of the humerus? a) teres major b) infraspinatus c) supraspinatus d) teres minor 7) With regard to action, which muscle is the odd one out? a) teres
    [Show full text]
  • Fractures of the Carpal Bones Excluding the Scaphoid
    FRACTURES OF THE CARPAL BONES EXCLUDING THE SCAPHOID BY MUNIR A. SHAH, MD, AND STEVEN F. VIEGAS, MD Carpal fractures excluding the scaphoid can cause morbidity that is dispropor- tionate to their incidence because they are easily overlooked and are often harbingers of a wider wrist injury. Failure to recognize a more global injury pattern can result in undertreatment and permanent wrist dysfunction. Diagnosis requires a high index of suspicion,familiarity with carpal topography to guide the physical examination,and judicious use of specialized radiographic views and ancillary imaging techniques. Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand racture of the carpal bones, excluding the topography to guide the physical examination and scaphoid, account for approximately 40% of judicious use of specialized radiographic views and Fall carpal fractures.1 Paradigms for evaluation ancillary imaging techniques based on clinical sus- and treatment of the fractured scaphoid are well picion. Second, such fractures are often harbingers delineated in the literature. The less common frac- of significant ligamentous disruption or associated tures of other carpal bones have received consider- carpal fractures. Failure to recognize a more global ably less attention. However, these injuries can injury pattern can result in undertreatment and produce morbidity that is disproportionate to their permanent wrist dysfunction. incidence for several reasons. First, carpal fractures We examine the incidence, mechanisms of injury, excluding the scaphoid may have a subtle clinical associated osseous and ligamentous injuries, physical and radiographic presentation and are easily over- examination findings, useful radiographic views, and looked. Diagnosis requires familiarity with carpal ancillary imaging techniques and management prin- ciples of these often overlooked carpal fractures.
    [Show full text]
  • Isolated Fracture of Pisiform: Case Report of a Rare Injury of Wrist
    Internet Journal of Medical Update. 2016 January;11(1):19-21. doi: 10.4314/ijmu.v11i1.5 Internet Journal of Medical Update Journal home page: http://www.akspublication.com/ijmu Case Reoprt Isolated fracture of pisiform: case report of a rare injury of wrist Vikas Verma1ᴪ, Ajai Singh2, Santosh Kumar2, Manvendra Pratap Singh3 1Department of Orthopedics, Era’s Lucknow Medical College and Hospital, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India 2Department of Orthopedics, King George's Medical College, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India 3Department of Orthopedics, Integral Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India (Received 18 March 2015 and accepted 25 August 2015) ABSTRACT: Isolated fracture of the pisiform is an extremely rare injury. Generally fractures of the pisiform are associated with fractures of other carpal bones or the distal radius. Fractures of the carpals and metacarpals account for roughly 6% of all fractures. The average incidence of pisiform fractures is 0.2% of all carpal fractures and approximately half of them are isolated fractures. Fracture of the pisiform may be missed on standard radiographs due to orientation of the fracture, improper wrist positioning, superimposition of adjacent bones, an inadequate number of projections or more obvious fractures of other carpal bones. Special radiographic projections such as carpal tunnel, scaphoid or supinated oblique view are indicated if routine AP and lateral views fail to demonstrate a fracture. MRI is the second-step imaging method in patients whose radiographs are negative or indistinct. MRI not only shows the fracture line but also shows marrow edema within the pisiform bone indicating fracture. Late sequels include pisotriquetral chondromalacia, subluxation and osteoarthritis consequent to poor alignment of the articular surfaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Pisiformectomy
    PISIFORMECTOMY The pisiform is one of the eight carpal (wrist) bones. It is an example of a “sesamoid” bone, which is situated within a tendon (like the knee-cap). It sits on top of the triquetrum bone and forms the “piso-triquetral” joint. Arthritis causes pain on the inside of the palm and wrist. Arthritis in the piso-triquetral joint is quite rare and may follow injury to region. The problem is likely to persist. The methods for relieving discomfort in an arthritic joint include (i) activity modification, (ii) pain-killers, (iii) steroid injections and (iv) surgery. The effects of steroid injections in this and most joints are temporary. Surgery is the only definitive treatment for persistent symptoms. The usual indication is pain and consequent functional difficulties. The operation involves removal of the pisiform bone. The function of the tendon is not altered by its removal. The pisiform bone is extremely close to the ulnar artery and ulnar nerve. The nerve is important in that it supplies most of the small muscles in the hand and supplies sensation to the little, ring and sometimes middle fingers The operation is usually performed as a day-case under regional anaesthetic (arm numb) and/or general anaesthetic (asleep). It involves short incision over the heel of the hand Your hand will be placed in a bulky padded dressing to protect the operation. Hand elevation is important to prevent swelling and stiffness of the fingers. Movement of the hand and fingers should be continued and you should perform normal light activities after the operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Ulnar and Humeral Heads Forming Separate Bellies. a Rare Case of Digastric Flexor Carpi Ulnaris Muscle
    Int. J. Morphol., Case Report 27(1):31-34, 2009. Ulnar and Humeral Heads Forming Separate Bellies. A Rare Case of Digastric Flexor Carpi Ulnaris Muscle Cabezas Ulnar y Humeral Formando Vientres Separados. Un Caso Raro del Músculo Flexor Ulnar del Carpo Digástrico Mohandas Rao K. G.; Seetharama M. Bhat; Venkataramana V. & Vincent Rodrigues RAO, K. G. M.; BHAT, S. M.; Venkataramana, V. & RODRIGUES, V. Ulnar and humeral heads forming separate bellies. A rare case of digastric flexor carpi ulnaris. Int. J. Morphol., 27(1):31-34, 2009. SUMMARY: Proper knowledge of muscular variations is essential for both anatomists and surgeons. Variations of the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) are not very common. We are reporting an unusual case of FCU muscle with two bellies. The two heads (ulnar and humeral) of the muscle continued as two separate bellies and the tendons of which joined each other slightly proximal to the wrist before getting inserted to pisiform bone. Further, detailed literature review of variations of FCU muscle is done and the developmental basis for the variation and its surgical importance are discussed. KEY WORDS: Flexor carpi ulnaris muscle; Variations of forearm muscles; Ulnar head; Humeral head. INTRODUCTION Variations in muscles of the extensor compartment separately. The limb belonged to the left side of an of the fore arm are quite common. However, in the flexor approximately 60-year-old male cadaver. compartment not many variations are noted. There are very few reports of the variations of flexor carpi ulnaris muscle Two bellies of the muscles were seen on the medial (FCU).
    [Show full text]
  • Homologies of the Carpal Bones in Flying Squirrels (Pteromyinae): a Review
    Mammal Study 26: 61-68 (2001) •. R . © the Mammalogical Society of Japan ' ,u" •XCTrc" Homologies of the carpal bones in flying squirrels (Pteromyinae): a review Richard W. Thorington, Jr.1 and Brian J. Stafford2 1 ^Department of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560-0108 USA 2Department of Anatomy, Howard University College of Medicine, 520 W Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20059 USA Abstract. The homologies of the carpal bones of flying squirrels, presented by Oshida et al. (2000a, b), are reviewed, together with the evidence supporting traditional homology assessments. Evidence for the homology of the styliform cartilage of flying squirrels with the hypothenar cartilage of other squirrels is also reviewed. Development, articulations, topography, and muscle insertions favor both the traditional hypothesis of homology assess- ments of the carpal bones and also the hypothesis that the styliform cartilage is homologous with the hypothenar cartilage. Key words: carpal homologies, flying squirrels, Pteromyinae, styliform cartilage. In two papers, Oshida et al. (2000a, b) described the styliform cartilage of flying squirrels and suggested that it is homologous with the pisiform bone of other mammals. This is a revolutionary interpretation of the homology of the carpus. It contrasts with the hypothe- sis of Thorington et al. (1998) that the styliform cartilage of flying squirrels is homologous with the hypothenar cartilage of other squirrels. In addition, the homology assessments of Oshida et al. (2000a, b) for all the proximal carpal bones differ fundamentally from the more traditional hypothesis followed by many authors, e.g. Hill (1937), Bryant (1945), Holmgren (1952), Grasse and Dekeyser (1955), Thorington (1984), Thorington et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Region of the Forearm
    Thomas Jefferson University Jefferson Digital Commons Regional anatomy McClellan, George 1896 Vol. 1 Jefferson Medical Books and Notebooks November 2009 The Region of the Forearm Follow this and additional works at: https://jdc.jefferson.edu/regional_anatomy Part of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Recommended Citation "The Region of the Forearm" (2009). Regional anatomy McClellan, George 1896 Vol. 1. Paper 18. https://jdc.jefferson.edu/regional_anatomy/18 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Jefferson Digital Commons. The Jefferson Digital Commons is a service of Thomas Jefferson University's Center for Teaching and Learning (CTL). The Commons is a showcase for Jefferson books and journals, peer-reviewed scholarly publications, unique historical collections from the University archives, and teaching tools. The Jefferson Digital Commons allows researchers and interested readers anywhere in the world to learn about and keep up to date with Jefferson scholarship. This article has been accepted for inclusion in Regional anatomy McClellan, George 1896 Vol. 1 by an authorized administrator of the Jefferson Digital Commons. For more information, please contact: [email protected]. 372 THE REGION OF THE FOREARilI. nerve, owing to its close relation to the internal epicondyle and the difficulty of detaching th e soft structures from that bony prominence. It is very important to preserve the periosteum over the olecranon and the strong fascia over the anconeus muscle, so that the triceps may not be altogether severed from the ulna. The relations of the parts exposed in the procedure by a posterior vertical incision (on the left side) are as follows (Plate 52, Fig.
    [Show full text]