Annual Turkish M&A Review 2011

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annual Turkish M&A Review 2011 Annual Turkish M&A Review 2011 Corporate Finance January 2012 2 Foreword Despite the turbulence in the Eurozone and the political instability in the Arab region, foreign investors’ interest in the Turkish market remained very strong, from strategic investors as well as private equity, resulting in a dynamic M&A market again in 2011. In 2011, a deal volume of c. US$15 billion materialized through 241 deals. Vitality in M&A activity continued well and the previous year’s record number of deals was exceeded. On the other hand, the reflection of such activity on the total deal volume has been modest, as the majority of transactions in 2011 occurred in the small and mid-size segments, with a scarcity of big-ticket transactions, especially privatizations. While Turkey’s strong growth performance and healthy financial system act as catalysts for a healthy investment environment, Europe’s deepening public debt crisis, coupled with Turkey’s current account deficit, inflation risk and diminishing growth forecasts signal a difficult period in the near term. Nevertheless, the dynamic middle market, secondary sales and investors’ continued interest still promise an active M&A market in 2012. On behalf of our corporate finance team in Deloitte Turkey, I am delighted to share our annual Turkish M&A review, featuring our analyses and views regarding the M&A market here. Başak Vardar Partner Corporate Finance 1 Basis of Presentation Transactions data presented in this report are based on information that is readily available in the public domain and include transactions with closing procedures still ongoing at the year end. This study does not include capital market transactions, IPOs, real estate sales, intra-group share transfers and transactions of financial institutions within the framework of debt restructuring. We do not accept any responsibility as to the accuracy or completeness of the data or as to whether all transactions listed herein will necessarily close. 2 Middle market dominates Turkish M&A Turkish market, with its sustained growth, once again served as an attractive destination for investors amidst the uncertain global environment. Total M&A deal numbers in 2011 surpassed the record level of 2010 with 241 deals. Middle market transactions were dominant. In the absence of big ticket privatizations, total deal volume was at a level of US$15(1) billion. While the global economic recovery that started average deal size of c. US$28 million, indicating in 2010 has slowed down in 2011, Turkey has that small and mid cap segments saw the most been one of the fastest growing economies in the activity. Transactions with a deal value less than world, which encouraged the M&A activity. US$50 million represented 83% of the total deal number, but only 22% of the total deal volume. Out of 241 transactions in 2011, 113 had a disclosed deal value, adding up to c. US$11.9 Privatizations comprised a considerable part of billion. Considering the estimated value of deals the annual volume in the previous years, but with undisclosed values, total M&A volume have been the weak side of the M&A market was around US$15 billion in 2011. While this in 2011. The share of privatizations in the total represents a decline of almost half as compared to deal volume was only 7%. Of the various state 2010, one should consider that most of the energy assets in the privatization list, which had been sector privatizations, which in 2010 made up half expected to be among the largest deals of the of the total deal volume (c. US$14 billion out of c. year, only İDO (İstanbul Deniz Otobüsleri) was US$29 billion as presented in our last year review) tendered. Galataport, the National Lottery, İGDAŞ, have been cancelled or could not be finalized. the Electricity Generation Assets and the Bridges Thus, in 2011, we see a similar volume of activity and Highways have remained in the waiting list in the private sector M&A as in 2010. together with the pending energy privatizations of 2010. Foreign investors have generated c. 74% of the deal volume (c. US$11.1 billion, including Financial investors’ activity on the other hand, estimates for undisclosed values) through 138 was at an all-time high in terms of number of deals, as opposed to 36% in 2010 and have deals. Private equity firms have continued to shaped the Turkish M&A activity to a great extent pursue Turkish targets and played a leading role in 2011. The healthcare and e-commerce sectors in healthcare, e-commerce, food & beverage and were of special interest for foreign investors in education. addition to traditionally preferred sectors such as manufacturing, financial services and food & Despite diminishing growth forecasts and the beverage. worsening global economy, we should be able to rely on the dynamic middle market, secondary The largest ten transactions comprised c. 56% of sales, private equity activity and the increasing the total annual volume. Excluding those big ticket eagerness of foreign investors towards Turkey all transactions, total volume of the remainder was together to deliver a lively year for M&A activity in only c. US$6.6 billion, that corresponded to an 2012. (1) Including estimates for deals with undisclosed values. 1 Five - year deal snapshot Year 2007 2008 2009 2010* 2011 Deal Number 160 169 101 203 241 Deal Volume US$19.3 billion US$16.2 billion US$5.2 billion US$29 billion US$15 billion Privatizations / US$2.3 billion / US$5.2 billion / US$1.2 billion / US$14.6 billion / US$1 billion / Share in Total 12% 32% 23% 50% 7% Foreign Investors 70% of deal value 85% of deal value 43% of deal value 36% of deal value 74% of deal value Financial Investors 13% of deal value 30% of deal value 13% of deal value 3% of deal value 8% of deal value Average Deal Size** c. US$120 million c. US$100 million c. US$51 million c. US$140 million c. US$62 million Share of Largest 10 60% 69% 44% 69% 56% Deals in Total Volume Note: Data presented above include estimates for deals with undisclosed values (*) Data related to 2010 includes the pending/cancelled energy privatization tenders amounting to US$11.8 billion in 17 transactions (**) In 2010, excluding top ten deals, the average deal size of the remainder was c. US$45 million. In 2011, excluding top ten deals, the average deal size of the remainder was c. US$28 million 2 Deal Volume and Deal Number 30 29.0 250 241 25 203 200 11.8 20 19.3 169 ) 160 150 n 16.2 o i l 15.0 l i b 15 $ S U ( 101 100 10 17.2 5.2 50 5 0 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Completed Deals Pending / Cancelled Privatization Tenders Deal Number 3 Investor origin Deal Number Deal Number The dominance of Turkish investors in the M&A scene over the previous two years has ended in Italy Germany 2011; foreign investors regained the upper hand. 11 10 Netherlands Foreign investors generated a deal volume of c. 9 France US$11.1 billion (including estimates) through 12 138 deals. Unlike 2009 and 2010, foreign investors played the leading role in transactions Foreign Investors Turkish Investors 138 UK1 and increased their contribution to the total 103 16 deal volume to a mass level of c. 74% (c. 36% Other in 2010). This was, firstly because the activity of 58 USA Turkish buyers who are historically active buyers 22 mainly in privatizations, remained low in the absence of such deals; and secondly, the global economic recovery, although fragile, in the post crisis period and Turkey’s ongoing sound performance, encouraged foreign investors’ appetite towards Turkey. Against foreign investors’ Deal Value (Disclosed; US$ million) 138 transactions in 2011, Turkish investors Deal Value (Disclosed; US$ Million) engaged in 103 acquisitions worth c. US$3.9 billion (including estimates). In the absence of big UK1 ticket privatizations, Turkish investors were mostly 4,519 channeled to mid-market transactions. Malaysia Foreign Investors 1,260 9,082 Turkish Investors 2,769 Russia 485 Belgium 480 Other Netherlands 1,912 425 (1) Does not include the İDO deal. 4 In terms of number of deals, foreign and Turkish European investors have been the most active investors shared the total M&A market almost group among foreign investors with a total deal evenly. The former focused on food & beverage, value amounting to US$7.8 billion (including financial services, energy, e-commerce and estimates), thereby comprising c. 70% of foreign manufacturing; while the latter focused on energy investors’ deal value. Involved in both of the two and IT sectors. Healthcare sector was in the center largest deals in 2011, British investors have been of attention for the both parties. the dominant group among European buyers. Investors from the US continued their interest in In 2011, the Turkish M&A market attracted a well- investing overseas as they completed 22 deals in balanced mix of foreign investors from the US, 2011 (13 deals in 2010). Europe, the Gulf Region, the Far East and other regions. Regardless of the geographical proximity or investment size considerations, investors from all over the world paid close attention to the Turkish targets. 5 Private equity activity Sustained growth of the Turkish economy in the In addition to long-time favourite sectors such post-crisis period and strong growth prospects as retail and food & beverage; healthcare and in various sectors have encouraged private e-commerce companies have been the most equity investments in 2011. Financial investors sought-after M&A targets by financial investors experienced a solid year in Turkey, completing an in 2011.
Recommended publications
  • Günlük Bülten S&P 500 Brent Petrol USD Endeks %0.36 -%0.75 %0.17
    Türkiye | Piyasalar 26 Ocak 2021 Salı Günlük Bülten S&P 500 Brent Petrol USD Endeks %0.36 -%0.75 %0.17 Ekonomik Veriler Açıklanacak Veriler Saat Piyasa Yorumu: İngiltere İşsizlik Oranı 10:00 Amerika Tüketici Güveni 18:00 TSİ Bu sabah BIST100’de aşağı yönlü bir açılış bekliyoruz. Küresel piyasalardaki negatif seyir devam ederken, hisse senetlerinde satışların Hisse Senedi Piyasası devam ettiğini görüyoruz. Zayıf bankacılık ve havacılık hisse senetlerinin performansı endekse karşı genel duyarlılığı etkiliyor. 50,000 1,580 48,000 1,570 Bu sabah negatif açılış ve sonrasında 1510 – 1550 arasında işlem 46,000 1,560 aktivitesi bekliyoruz. 44,000 1,550 42,000 1,540 40,000 1,530 38,000 1,520 Bugünün Haberleri: 36,000 1,510 34,000 1,500 15-Oca 18-Oca 19-Oca 20-Oca 21-Oca 22-Oca 25-Oca Piyasa Gelişmesi İşlem Hacmi, TRY mln BIST 100 . Reel kesim güveninde düşüş Bono Piyasası . Ocak ayı - Kapasite Kullanım Oranı 60.0 13.6 13.5 50.0 Hisse Senetleri 13.5 40.0 13.4 13.4 . ARCLK; 4Ç20 sonuçları beklentilerin oldukça üzerinde geldi / 30.0 13.3 20.0 13.3 olumlu 13.2 10.0 13.2 0.0 13.1 . PETKM; Etilen-nafta spread’i yeniden 650 USD'ye yöneldi / olumlu 15-Oca 18-Oca 19-Oca 20-Oca 21-Oca 22-Oca 25-Oca . GUBRF; 2020 yılı faaliyetleri hakkında bilgilendirme / pozitif İşlem Hacmi, TRY mln Türkiye 2030 Endeksler, para piyasaları ve emtia . BAGFS; %200 bedelli sermaye artırımı / nötr Kapanış Önceki 1 Gün 1 Ay Yıl Baş. BIST100 1,540 1,542 -0.1% 8.0% 4.3% .
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Ocak 2021 Itibariyle Şirketlerin Katilim Endeksi
    1 OCAK 2021 İTİBARİYLE ŞİRKETLERİN KATILIM ENDEKSİ KRİTERLERİNE UYGUNLUK DURUMU & ARINDIRMA ORANLARI Faaliyet alanı, grubu ve pazarı uygun olmayan şirketlerin finansal kriterleri hesaplanmamaktadır. Faizli krediler / (piyasa değeri ya da aktif toplamdan büyük olanı) < %33 kriterini geçemeyen şirketlerin diğer finansal kriterleri hesaplanmamaktadır. Faiz Getirili Nakit/(piyasa değeri ya da aktif toplamdan büyük olanı)<%33 kriterini geçemeyen şirketlerin diğer finansal kriterleri hesaplanmamaktadır. Toplam Faizli Uygunsuz Krediler / Piyasa (Nakit+Menkul Uygun Olmayan Sıra Hisse Kodu Hisse Adı Gerekçe Değeri veya Aktif (< Kıymet)/Piyasa Değeri Faaliyetlerden Gelir / %33) veya Aktif (<%33) Toplam Gelir (< %5) 1 BIMAS Bim Mağazalar Uygun 0,0% 0,0% 0,2% 2 EREGL Ereğli Demir Çelik Uygun 14,4% 25,3% 2,7% 3 ASELS Aselsan Uygun 9,6% 5,5% 1,5% 4 THYAO Türk Hava Yolları Uygun 18,3% 4,6% 4,3% 5 CCOLA Coca Cola İçecek Uygun 29,5% 18,4% 1,8% 6 GUBRF Gübre Fabrik. Uygun 22,7% 11,5% 0,3% 7 BERA Bera Holding Uygun 26,3% 0,0% 0,5% 8 TKFEN Tekfen Holding Uygun 14,0% 15,6% 1,2% 9 OYAKC Oyak Çimento Uygun 9,7% 6,2% -22,6% 10 PGSUS Pegasus Uygun 7,5% 12,4% 2,6% 11 EGEEN Ege Endüstri Uygun 4,3% 22,0% 2,1% 12 TTRAK Türk Traktör Uygun 30,7% 32,9% 2,3% 13 MAVI Mavi Giyim Uygun 30,2% 22,6% 1,5% 14 LOGO Logo Yazılım Uygun 7,6% 7,9% 2,8% 15 KARTN Kartonsan Uygun 0,0% 7,4% 1,8% 16 SELEC Selçuk Ecza Deposu Uygun 0,6% 10,6% 0,7% 17 ISDMR İskenderun Demir Çelik Uygun 4,9% 0,2% 1,3% 18 RTALB RTA Laboratuvarları Uygun 1,5% 0,1% 2,8% 19 CEMAS Çemaş Döküm Uygun 0,3% 17,9%
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Impact of Socio-Political Crises on the Operational Performance of the Turkish Airlines
    IBN HALDUN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES MASTER OF SCIENCE IN AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT MASTER THESIS EXPLORING THE IMPACT OF SOCIO-POLITICAL CRISES ON THE OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE OF THE TURKISH AIRLINES VİLDAN HAVVA KESİCİ THESIS SUPERVISOR: PROF. MUSTAFA KEMAL YILMAZ ISTANBUL, 2020 IBN HALDUN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES MASTER OF SCIENCE IN AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT MASTER THESIS EXPLORING THE IMPACT OF SOCIO-POLITICAL CRISES ON THE OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE OF THE TURKISH AIRLINES by VİLDAN HAVVA KESİCİ A thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Management THESIS SUPERVISOR: PROF. MUSTAFA KEMAL YILMAZ ISTANBUL, 2020 ÖZ SOSYO-POLİTİK KRİZLERİN TÜRK HAVA YOLLARI’NIN FAALİYET PERFORMANSINA ETKİLERİ Kesici, Vildan Havva Hava Taşımacılığı Yönetimi Yüksek Lisans Programı Tez Danışmanı: Prof. Dr. Mustafa Kemal Yılmaz Ocak 2020, 90 sayfa Çalışmada, 2010-2018 döneminde Türkiye’de yaşanan sosyo-politik birtakım krizlerin, Türk Hava Yolları’nın faaliyet peformansı üzerindeki etkisi, arz edilen koltuk kilometre (ASK), ücretli yolcu kilometre (RPK), yolcu doluluk oranı (PLF) ve taşınan yolcu sayıları gibi parametreler değerlendirilerek araştırılmıştır. Bu olaylar kronolojik sıra itibari ile; Gezi Parkı, Rus askeri jetinin vurulması, 15 Temmuz askeri darbe girişimi ve elektronik cihazların yasaklanmasıdır. Söz konusu olayların etkileri bölgesel bazda dört farklı algoritma kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir: (1) nedensel etki analizi, (2) aykırı değer algoritması (ODA), (3) kırılma noktası algoritması (BDA) ve (4) değişim noktası algoritması (CPA). Çalışma bulguları, sosyo-politik krizlerin Türk Hava Yolları'nın faaliyet performansı üzerinde bölgesel olarak sınırlı ölçüde etkileri olduğunu göstermiştir. CPA, Gezi Park döneminde yurtiçi, Afrika ve Kuzey Amerika bölgelerinde RPK’da; Avrupa, Uzak Doğu ve Kuzey Amerika bölgelerinde ASK değerlerinde değişim tespit etmiştir.
    [Show full text]
  • Sıra No Kod Banka Adı Kod Banka
    Tablo: TCMB Ödeme Sistemleri Katılımcı Listesi (2020) Koda Göre Sıralama Alfabetik Sıralama SIRA NO KOD BANKA ADI KOD BANKA ADI 1 0001 T.C. MERKEZ BANKASI 0100 ADABANK A.Ş. 2 0004 İLLER BANKASI A.Ş. 0046 AKBANK T.A.Ş. 3 0010 T.C.ZİRAAT BANKASI A.Ş. 0143 AKTİF YATIRIM BANKASI A.Ş. 4 0012 T. HALK BANKASI A.Ş. 0203 ALBARAKA TÜRK KATILIM BANKASI A.Ş. 5 0014 T. SINAİ KALKINMA BANKASI A.Ş. 0124 ALTERNATİFBANK A.Ş. 6 0015 T. VAKIFLAR BANKASI T.A.O 0135 ANADOLUBANK A.Ş. 7 0016 T. EXİMBANK 0091 ARAP TÜRK BANKASI 8 0017 T. KALKINMA BANKASI A.Ş. 0149 BANK OF CHINA TURKEY A.Ş. 9 0029 BİRLEŞİK FON BANKASI A.Ş. 0142 BANKPOZİTİF KREDİ VE KALK.BANK.A.Ş. 10 0032 T. EKONOMİ BANKASI A.Ş. 0029 BİRLEŞİK FON BANKASI A.Ş. 11 0046 AKBANK T.A.Ş. 0125 BURGAN BANK A.Ş. 12 0059 ŞEKERBANK T.A.Ş. 0092 CITIBANK A.Ş. 13 0062 T. GARANTİ BANKASI A.Ş. 0134 DENİZBANK A.Ş. 14 0064 T. İŞ BANKASI A.Ş. 0115 DEUTSCHE BANK A.Ş. 15 0067 YAPI VE KREDİ BANKASI A.Ş. 0138 DİLER YATIRIM BANKASI A.Ş. 16 0091 ARAP TÜRK BANKASI 0103 FİBABANKA A.Ş. 17 0092 CITIBANK A.Ş. 0150 GOLDEN GLOBAL YATIRIM BANKASI A.Ş.(*) 18 0096 TURKISH BANK A.Ş. 0139 GSD YATIRIM BANKASI A.Ş. 19 0098 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK N.A. 0123 HSBC BANK A.Ş. 20 0099 ING BANK A.Ş. 0109 ICBC TURKEY BANK A.Ş. 21 0100 ADABANK A.Ş.
    [Show full text]
  • Cee / Middle East / North Africa This Week
    CEE / MIDDLE EAST / NORTH AFRICA THIS WEEK January 21, 2011 POLAND 2 CZECH REPUBLIC 12 HUNGARY 20 SLOVAKIA 25 TURKEY 31 BULGARIA 40 ROMANIA 45 CROATIA 49 SERBIA 54 BOSNIA & HERZEGOVINA 59 ALBANIA 64 MIDDLE EAST & N. AFRICA 67 Written by IntelliNews. The report is based on sources which we believe to be reliable, but no warranty, either express or implied, is provided in relation to the accuracy or completeness of the information. The views expressed are our best judgement as of the date of issue and are subject to change without notice. Opinions are not necessarily those of Internet Securities Inc., Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC or its affiliates. Internet Securities Inc. and Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC take no responsibility for decisions made on the basis of these opinions. Any redistribution of this information is strictly prohibited. Copyright © 1999-2011 Internet Securities, Inc., all rights reserved. A Euromoney Institutional Investor company. Copyright © 1998-2011 Sofia, all rights reserved. COPYING PROHIBITED. COPYRIGHT 1999-2011 INTERNET SECURITIES, INC., ALL RIGHTS RESERVED POLAND MACROECONOMIC REVIEW Eurostat: Poland's HICP inflation The Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices (HICP) in Poland amounted to 0.3% m/m in accelerates to 2.9% y/y in December December, 2010 and was 2.9% in annual terms vs. 2.6% y/y a month earlier, the EU's statistical office Eurostat has said. In line with Eurostat's estimations, the average HICP inflation for the whole 27 EU amounted to 2.6% y/y in December (vs. 2.3% in November). In the euro-zone, the inflation was 2.2% y/y vs.
    [Show full text]
  • VERGİ NO UNVAN ADRES TELEFON FAKS (VAR / YOK) Altında Olanlar Için EVET / HAYIR) 1 0380753722 AKSU ELEKTRİKLİ EV ALETLERİ SANAYİ VE TİCARET A.Ş
    1/79 ELEKTRİK VE ELEKTRONİK İHRACATÇILARI BİRLİĞİ NİSAN 2019 OLAĞAN GENEL KURULUNA KATILABİLECEKLERİN LİSTESİ İMALATÇI/TEDARİKÇİ BORÇ DURUMU (Doğrudan İhracatı Sınırın 0 VERGİ NO UNVAN ADRES TELEFON FAKS (VAR / YOK) Altında Olanlar için EVET / HAYIR) 1 0380753722 AKSU ELEKTRİKLİ EV ALETLERİ SANAYİ VE TİCARET A.Ş. AKÇABURGAZ MAH. 3036. SOK. NO.2/3 ESENYURT - İSTANBUL 02128866169 02128866919 YOK HAYIR İKİTELLİ ORGANİZE SANAYİ BÖLG. B.DALAN CD. DERSANKOOP SAN SİT S6C BL N:130 2 6080059840 LİDER REZİSTANS MAKİNA SAN VE TİCARET LİMİTED ŞİRKETİ +90(533)779 14 78 VAR HAYIR BAŞAKŞEHİR - İSTANBUL 3 0010381354 A DIŞ TİCARET LİMİTED ŞİRKETİ ÇIRPICI MAH.74/C SOK.NO:74/A ZEYTİNBURNU - İSTANBUL +90(212)416 81 23 +90(212)505 08 29 VAR HAYIR 4 0010803261 A ROYAL SOĞUTMA END.MUTFAK SAN.VE TİC.LTD.ŞTİ. KEÇECİ PİRİ MAH.HASBAHÇE SK.N.9 BEYOĞLU / İSTANBUL BEYOĞLU - İSTANBUL +90(212)361 32 86 YOK HAYIR 5 0010724648 AB POVER BALİSTİK GÜV. VE ENR. SİST. İNŞ. MAD. SAN. VE TİC. LTD. ŞTİ. TURGUT ÖZAL BULV. CUMHURİYET MAH. NO:51/2 BÜYÜKÇEKMECE - İSTANBUL +90(212)444 44 28 +90(212)394 36 58 VAR HAYIR 6 0010736571 ABA LED AYDINLATMA SAN.VE TİC.A.Ş. AKÇABURGAZ MAHALLESİ AKÇABURGAZ CADDESİ NO:43 ESENYURT - İSTANBUL +90(212)222 42 10 +90(212)222 42 11 YOK HAYIR 7 0010658532 ABAMET ÇEVRE TEKNOLOJİLERİ MÜHENDİSLİK MAKİNE İNŞAAT SAN.VE TİC.LTD.ŞTİ. ŞEMSETTİN GÜNALTAY CD.NO:89/11 KADIKÖY - İSTANBUL +90(216)373 33 30 +90(216)373 38 33 VAR HAYIR 8 0010047133 ABB ELEKTRIK SANAYİ ANONİM ŞİRKETİ ORGANIZE SANAYI BOLGESI 2.CAD NO.16 ÜMRANİYE - İSTANBUL +90(216)528 22 00 +90(216)466 53 85 YOK HAYIR 9 0010691250 ABB İHRACAT TİCARET VE ELEKTRİK SANAYİ ANONİM ŞİRKETİ ORGANİZE SANAYİ BÖLGESİ 2.CADDE NO:16 YUKARI DUDULLU ÜMRANİYE - İSTANBUL +90(216)528 22 00 +90(216)466 53 84 YOK HAYIR SARAY MAH.
    [Show full text]
  • A Sectorial Analysis of Possible Information Leakages Prior to Merger and Acquisition Deals in Istanbul Stock Exchange
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Sönmezer, Sıtkı Article — Published Version A Sectorial Analysis of Possible Information leakages prior to Merger and Acquisition Deals in Istanbul Stock Exchange Journal of Economics and Political Economy Suggested Citation: Sönmezer, Sıtkı (2014) : A Sectorial Analysis of Possible Information leakages prior to Merger and Acquisition Deals in Istanbul Stock Exchange, Journal of Economics and Political Economy, ISSN 2148-8347, KSP Journals, Istanbul, Vol. 1, Iss. 2, pp. 186-194, http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/jepe.v1i2.63 , http://kspjournals.org/index.php/JEPE/article/view/63 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/105848 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence.
    [Show full text]
  • Entegre Yöntemlerle Türk Bankacılık Sisteminde Ortaklık Yapısı Odaklı İnceleme
    ISSN 1300-4646 | e-ISSN 2147-7582 Research Article/ Araştırma Makalesi Entegre Yöntemlerle Türk Bankacılık Sisteminde Ortaklık Yapısı Odaklı İnceleme M. Esra ATUKALP1 Geliş Tarihi/ Received Kabul Tarihi/ Accepted Yayın Tarihi/ Published 24/07/2020 11/02/2021 15/04/2021 Citation/Atıf: Atukalp, M. E., (2021), Entegre Yöntemlerle Türk Bankacılık Sisteminde Ortaklık Yapısı Odaklı İnceleme, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 35(2): Sayfa: 469-496, https://doi.org/10.16951/atauniiibd.773337 Öz: Bu çalışmanın amacı Türk bankacılık sisteminde faaliyet gösteren mevduat bankalarının Entropi ile ağırlıklandırılmış Mabac yöntemi ile performanslarını belirlemek ve ortaklık yapısının performansa etkisini ortaya koymaktır. Bu doğrultuda performansın belirlenmesinde ele alınan finansal oranların ve ağırlıklarının belirlenmesi için Entropi, performans değer ve sıralamalarının belirlenmesi için Mabac çok kriterli karar verme teknikleri kullanılmıştır. Söz konusu performansa ortaklık yapısının etkisinin belirlenmesinde ise Mann- Whitney U testi kullanılmıştır. Analiz 2014-2019 döneminde faaliyet gösteren mevduat bankaları ele alınarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Analiz sonucunda Rabobank’ın dönemin çoğunluğunda performansı en iyi olan banka olduğu gözlemlenmiştir. Kriterler arasında yer alan likidite oranının Entropi yöntemi ile belirlenen ağırlığının çok olması ve ele alınan dönemde, sistemde faaliyete yeni başlayan söz konusu bankanın kredi miktarı ile bağlantılı olarak likiditesinin fazlalığı özellikle ilk yılların sonuçlarında etkilidir.
    [Show full text]
  • Mergers and Acquisitions Report Turkey 2013
    Mergers and Acquisitions Report Turkey 2013 January 2014 Foreword In 2013, many countries continued to be impacted by the global economic crisis and political and economic troubles still dominated agendas. Yet, Turkey, with its economy still growing, albeit to a lesser extent than in previous years, continued to distinguish itself as a successful, important and attractive country to invest in, not only in its region but in the world. In a year when global mergers and acquisitions volume slowed down, Turkey also experienced a slight decrease in transaction volume but reached a record high in terms of the number of deals. After such a year, we are delighted to share the twelfth “EY Mergers and Acquisitions Report”, a widely respected and much used reference material by all market players. The EY Mergers and Acquisitions Report 2013 is a thorough compilation of the facts and trends in mergers and acquisitions that were realized in Turkey in 2013, including comparisons with previous years. The Report also presents the results of our traditional “Mergers and Acquisitions in Turkey Survey” whose participants comprised shareholders and upper management of prominent public companies and private sector establishments in Turkey. We thank the survey participants for their contributions and support, as well as the EY Corporate Finance Team who prepared the EY Mergers and Acquisitions Report 2013. Mustafa Çamlıca Müşfik Cantekinler EY Turkey EY Turkey Country Leader Head of Corporate Finance Services 15 January 2014 Content General evaluation 5 Investor profile 8 Sectoral breakdown 12 Public sector deals 14 Transaction volumes 15 2014 overview 16 The overlook of the Turkish Business World towards the M&A Market 18 List of M&A transactions in 2013 25 Basis of preparation of the study 32 Mergers and Acquisitions Report Turkey 2013 General evaluation In a year when developed countries, many of them European, achieved limited growth, Turkey stood out by meeting growth expectations and exceeding the previous year’s growth rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Piyasa Verileri Tablosu TL/USD 7,9379 BIST 100 1.191 Hisse Endeks H.A.O
    Tarih 23.10.20 Piyasa Verileri Tablosu TL/USD 7,9379 BIST 100 1.191 Hisse Endeks H.A.O. Kapanış Hisse Piyasa Değeri Piyasa Değeri Net Kar (TL)Net Kar Piyasa Göstergeleri Finansal Göstergeler (%; Yıllık) Getiri (%) Hisse Kodları (%) (TL) Adeti (TL mn) ($) 2018/12 2019/12 2019/06 2020/06 Değişim F/K PD/DD FD/FAVÖK FD/Satış Net Borç (TL) N.Kar Marjı FAVÖK Marjı Haftalık Aylık Yıllık Senetleri XU100 1.190,63 852.502.567.240 107.396.486.129 90.844.166.923 89.380.650.239 38.884.330.823 33.545.146.448 -13,7% 10,50 1,05 7,69 1,09 347.924.398.803 -0,18 7,98 19,32 BIST 100 Endeksi XU030 1.305,37 529.496.538.707 66.704.863.844 71.604.053.222 65.401.296.171 28.413.768.763 24.904.765.476 -12,3% 8,18 0,85 6,94 0,98 272.654.371.376 -0,79 5,98 5,67 BIST 30 Endeksi XUTUM 1.378,00 1.494.188.085.477 188.234.682.407 92.528.745.523 92.292.214.725 39.455.655.563 33.734.912.461 -14,5% 16,76 1,65 8,15 1,03 424.911.738.102 -0,18 9,71 35,10 BIST TÜM Endeksi DAYANIKLI TÜKETİM SEKTÖRÜ 32.381.175.025 4.079.312.542 1.850.293.457 1.853.440.020 799.052.835 1.619.543.088 102,7% 9,30 1,64 5,80 0,72 12.032.860.943 6,2% 13,0% -1,16 7,40 54,65 Beyaz Eşya 26.282.579.945 3.311.024.319 1.479.140.457 1.529.393.020 763.574.835 1.019.452.088 33,5% 10,15 1,72 6,36 0,74 6.085.333.943 7,3% 11,4% -1,33 7,80 37,79 ARCLK 30 25 28,22 675.728.205 19.069.049.945 2.402.278.933 851.756.000 924.833.000 444.484.000 662.357.000 49,0% 9,91 1,50 6,11 0,68 5.366.926.000 5,4% 11,1% 2,84 21,53 51,48 Arçelik IHEVA 60 2,06 350.500.000 722.030.000 90.959.826 6.828.981 42.860.897 6.181.709 7.578.984 22,6% 16,31 1,87 17,76 2,65 -2.161.992 16,3% 16,1% -5,50 -5,94 24,10 İhlas Ev Aletleri SILVR 45 4,50 45.000.000 202.500.000 25.510.525 -2.005.524 -6.372.877 -4.279.874 -1.203.896 71,9% a.d.
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of the Financial Performance of Reits in Borsa Istanbul: a Case Study Using the Entropy-Based TOPSIS Method
    http://ijfr.sciedupress.com International Journal of Financial Research Vol. 6, No. 2; 2015 An Evaluation of the Financial Performance of REITs in Borsa Istanbul: A Case Study Using the Entropy-Based TOPSIS Method Mehmet İslamoğlu1, Mehmet Apan1 & Ahmet Öztel2 1 Faculty of Business, Karabuk University, Karabuk, Turkey 2 Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Bartın University, Bartın, Turkey Correspondence: Mehmet İslamoğlu, Faculty of Business, Karabuk University, Pbx.78050, Karabuk, Turkey. Tel: 90-544-246-3920. E-mail: [email protected] Received: March 19, 2015 Accepted: April 2, 2015 Online Published: April 11, 2015 doi:10.5430/ijfr.v6n2p124 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v6n2p124 Abstract Real Estate Investment Trusts are financial intermediaries which facilitate the provision of finance for real estate properties and thus play a key role in the development of the real estate market. An accredited assessment of financial performance is more vital today as there is increasing competition which poses a risk to maintaining the market share of companies. Therefore, the valuation of companies in terms of liquidity, profitability, turnover and capital structure help managers to take the necessary measures and thus contribute to the soundness of the companies. In this study, a financial analysis of REITs between 2011Q1-2014Q3 within the financial market in Turkey was measured using Entropy based TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to An Ideal Solution) which is a widely-used Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method. According to the empirical results, for all the periods, Avrasya, Akmerkez, Sinpaş, Kiler and İş were found to be the most efficient REITs respectively, whereas, İdealist, Atakule, Alarko, Nurol and Vakıf demonstrated the worst financial performances throughout the whole period.
    [Show full text]
  • Banks in Turkey 2019
    MAY 2020 9 BANKS IN TURKEY 2019 THE BANKS ASSOCIATION OF TURKEY Nispetiye Caddesi Akmerkez B3 Blok Kat 13 Etiler 34340 ‹stanbul Phone: +90 212 282 09 73 Fax: +90 212 282 09 46 E-mail: [email protected] www.tbb.org.tr BANKS IN TURKEY 201 MAY 2020 BANKS IN TURKEY 2019 Publication No : 337 May 2020 ISBN 978-605-7642-12-7 (Electronic) Copyright © The Banks Association of Turkey, 2020 Publication Name : Banks in Turkey Publication Type : Local Periodical Publication Period : Annual Publication Date : May 2020 Owner of the Publication : The Banks Association of Turkey Managing Director : Dr. Ekrem Keskin Address : Nispetiye Cad. Akmerkez, B3 Blok Kat 13, Etiler, 34340 İstanbul Phone : +90-212-282 09 73 Fax : +90-212-282 09 46 E-mail : [email protected] URL : www.tbb.org.tr/en/home All rights reserved. No part of this report may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the Banks Association of Turkey. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure that the information contained in this book is correct, the Banks Association of Turkey does not assume any responsibility for any errors or omissions or for any consequences resulting therefrom. This book is prepared from the year-end audited and non-consolidated "The Common Data Set" of deposit banks and development and investment banks, that are prepared in accordance with BRSA's related Communique of "Financial Statements and Related Explanation and Footnotes of Banks That is Disclosed to the Public".
    [Show full text]