DOCSLIB.ORG

Population Trends in Relation to Resources Development in South Dakota J

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Population Trends in Relation to Resources Development in South Dakota J South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange South Dakota State University Agricultural Bulletins Experiment Station 8-1-1954 Population Trends in Relation to Resources Development in South Dakota J. P. Johansen Follow this and additional works at: http://openprairie.sdstate.edu/agexperimentsta_bulletins Recommended Citation Johansen, J. P., "Population Trends in Relation to Resources Development in South Dakota" (1954). Bulletins. Paper 440. http://openprairie.sdstate.edu/agexperimentsta_bulletins/440 This Bulletin is brought to you for free and open access by the South Dakota State University Agricultural Experiment Station at Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Bulletins by an authorized administrator of Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ·' .· ' JLLETIH 440 ,o. AUGUST 195.4 � ;./ n Relai:ionJo Resources Development: 6;, N S.OUTH DAKOTA URAL SOCIOLOGY DtPARTMrnT �GRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION OUTH DAKOTA STATE COLLEGE, BROOKINGS L:' 1- 0 � .._,; �--. J Contents South Dakota's Future Population Prospects -------------------------------------------- 3 General Aspects of Population Adjustment to Resources in South Dakota, 1930-1950 __________________________ -- ---------------------------------------------- 5 Geographic and Climatic Conditions in South Dakota ____________________ 5 Social and Economic Maladjustments in the Great Plains ________________ 8 A Revie,v of Population Trends in South Dakota, 1890-1950 ____________________ 11 Changes in Rural and Urban Residence of Population, 1870-1950 __ 14 Changes in the Farm Population of South Dakota, 1910-1950 ________ 14 Changes in the Rural-Nonfarm Population in South Dakota ________ 15 Population Changes of Small Towns, 1900-1950-------------------------------- 16 Recent Changes Related to Chil_dren and the Family ________________________ 19 Area Adjustments of Population in -South Dakota, 1930-1950 ________________ 22 Description of Economic Areas in South Dakota ____________________________ 22 Changes in theNumber of Farms According to Economic Areas, 1930-1950 -------------------------------------------------------------- 25 Indexes of Farm Mechanization and Electrification________________________ 26 Area Aspects of Population Changes in South Dakota, 1930-1950 __ 32 Main Aspec�s of Water Resources Development in South Dakota ________ 35 Recent Floods and Flood Control----------------------- --------------------------------- 35 Federal Government Participation in Flood Control------------------------ 36 Dams and Reservoirs on the Missouri Main Stem_____________________________ 73 Coordination of Multiple Purposes of Water Resources Projects ____ 39 \,\TaterResources Projects under the Bureau of Reclamation __________ 39 Irrigation Development in Western South Dakota---------------------------- 40 Irrigation Development in EasternSouth Dakota------------------------------ 43 Transmission of Hydro-Electric Pmver -----------------------------------------· ____ 44 Conclusions and Smnmaiy ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 44 Larger Alternativesof Population Adjustment and Resources Development h1 South Dakota, 1930-1950 _____ _________ ____ 44 Population Trends ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------- 46 The Need for Resources Development in South Dakota __________________ 47 This report is based on a state project conb·ibuting to the North Central regi<;mal project on population dynamics, NC-18. 2 In Relat:ion t:o Resources Development: IN SOUTH DAKOTA by JOHN _p. j OHAN SEN I South Dakota's Future Population Prospects OUTH DAKOTA'S population is likely to increase to a considerable extent S in the future on account of resources development. Several great water resources projects located on the Missouri River and its tributaries are under construction or being planned for multiple purposes, such as flood control, irrigation, hydro-electric power, municipal water supplies, and recreational areas. As these projects reach completion and are geared into the economy of the state, they should have several direct and indirect influences upon the state's popula­ tion. But before these developments ministrative authorities in the form­ can be realized, it seems probable ulation of plans for the Missouri that the state ,,,ill have a smaller Basin. These projections of the proportion of the Nation's popula­ state's future population involve a tion than it has had in the past. A low, a medium, and a high estimate. considerable decrease in this pro­ By 1975, the low estimate points portion occured, as shown in Table to a population of 588,000, a medi­ 1, from 1930 to 1950. Several of the um estimate of 675,000, and a high northwest central states have ex­ estimate of 800,000. A related set of perienced a similar trend. The num­ estimates was also made for the total ber of their inhabitants has not in­ population of the United States. creased nearly as fast as the Na­ Each of the three estimates portends tion's. The population of Iowa, for that South Dakota will have smaller example, accounted for 3.2 percent proportion of the Nation's popula­ of the Nation's population in 1880, tion than it had in 1950. but it had only 1.7 percent of the 1Rese�1rch Associate in Hural Sociologv. South ll:1ko1:i Nation's in 1950. Yet in these 70 Siatc College Agricultural Expcrim�·;1t S1:1tion. Thi, study is p:irt of ,; more cornprchensiYc rcsc:irch pruiccl years, Iowa's population increased 111:idc pc,ssiblc thro11;:h a coopcr:itive agrcernenl l>ctwccn 2 the South D:1ko1:1 St:1tc College of A;:ricul111rc :ind �fc­ from 1,624,615 to 2,621,073. chanic Arts :rnd the Bureau of Rccbrn:11ion. U. S. ]lc­ Estimates of the state's future p:1rtmcnt of 1hc Interior. !.!Jowa Agricultural Experiment St;1tion, J\mn,, low:1. population were made recently by /0111a Farm Scin,c('. Vol. VII. p ]3. Sec :dsu 1950 U11itf'd S!a/c.< Cn1.<11s of 1'0/ittfotio11, U. S. S"111111ary. N11111hn population experts and used by ad- of /11/w/Ji1a11/s, Table 8, p. l-1 J. 3 4 Soulb Dalwla Expe,·iment Station Bulletin 440 Table 1. Population Census of 1930 and 1950 and Population Estimates for 1975 in the United States and in South Dakota Population Census Population Estimates 1975* ]930 1950 Low Medium High -���--��� .���������������� United States 122,775,046 150,697,361 ]65,616,000 190,101,000 225,310,000 South Dakota 692,849 652,740 588,000 675,UOO 800,000 :SrnirTc,: M:irgarcl J. Hagood and Jacob S. Sicgd, "l'rojcctiun of J(cgiun:il llis1rih111iun of l'opula1io11," Agrir11/111ra/ J·:co11ri1i1in k,·.< carr/J, V1JI. Ill, Nu. 2. pp. 41-52. (April 1951). Charles E. Brokaw, Hcgion;rl IJircctur U. S. !Jcp;rrtm<:nl uf Commerce. l>cm·n. Colorado, "l',,pul:11io11 F1,recasts for the Missouri Basin St:rtc,." Appendix G :rnd Ap pc11d1x B . ir1 Mi11111cs 0/ 1/ic Fi/1y-Fo11rt/J Ma1111g o/ J/Jc Missouri /Jasin lnta-Agen,y Comm,11,·,·, (J;rnuary 24, ]952). The estimates made in Table 1 in­ climatic, political, economic, an<l volve assumptions to the effect that technological. according to the high estimate of The climatic factor, which in­ population in 1975, the United cludes conditions of temperature, States population would increase precipitation, length of the growing above the census of 1950 by. 49.4 season, killing frosts, and seasons of percent while South Dakota's popu­ drought or seasons of normal rain­ lation \.Vould increase only 22.6 per­ fall h a s exerted an important cent over its 1950 census. influence on the population of the Which one of these estirnates, if state. Political events and condi­ any of them, \.Villturn out to be cor­ tions, extending far beyond the bor­ rect? In the light of present condi­ der of the state, have resulted in two tions in South Dakota, both the lmv \i\1orld \Vars an<l the more recent and the medium estimates appear conflict in Korea. Economic fluctu­ to under-estimate the potential pop­ ations in the form of inflation and ulation grov>1th of the state. The deflation have accompanied each high estimate of 800,000 by 1975 major change from peace to war and may turn out to be more nearly cor­ from war to peace. rect. Past population trends of the The changing agricultural tech­ state point both upward and down­ nology, the use of tractors, motor ward-rapidly upward from 1880 to trucks, cornbines, and many other 1930; dowm:vard from 1930 to 1950. mechanical facilities, has greatly in­ During the past 10 years, the state Huenced the population shift from experienced both a large net out­ farms to cities. The changes in migration during the war years transportation, travel, and commu­ ( 1940-1945) and a net return migra­ nication have had the effect of tion during the last 5 years ( 194.5- shrinking the ,,,orld in which we 1950). Although the state had near­ live. In a relatively short time the ly the same population in 1940 and automobile, electricity, radio, radar, in 1950, it did have a net out-migra­ television, aircraft, and atomic tion of nearly 80,000 persons. energy have greatly transformed lm­ Estimates of South Dakota's fu­ man society. In the future, social ture population must take several changes will continue to come to factors into consideration. These South Dakota. The effects of the factors may be classified briefly as
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 107 Part 208—Flood Control Regulations
    Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, DoD § 208.10 PART 208—FLOOD CONTROL sponsible for the efficient operation REGULATIONS and maintenance of all of the struc- tures and facilities during flood periods Sec. and for continuous inspection and 208.10 Local flood protection works; mainte- maintenance of the project works dur- nance and operation of structures and fa- ing periods of low water, all without cilities. cost to the United States. 208.11 Regulations for use of storage allo- (3) A reserve supply of materials cated for flood control or navigation and/ or project operation at reservoirs subject needed during a flood emergency shall to prescription of rules and regulations be kept on hand at all times. by the Secretary of the Army in the in- (4) No encroachment or trespass terest of flood control and navigation. which will adversely affect the effi- 208.19 Marshall Ford Dam and Reservoir cient operation or maintenance of the (Mansfield Dam and Lake Travis), Colo- project works shall be permitted upon rado River, Tex. 208.22 Twin Buttes Dam and Reservoir, Mid- the rights-of-way for the protective fa- dle and South Concho Rivers, Tex. cilities. 208.25 Pensacola Dam and Reservoir, Grand (5) No improvement shall be passed (Neosho) River, Okla. over, under, or through the walls, lev- 208.26 Altus Dam and Reservoir, North Fork ees, improved channels or floodways, Red River, Okla. nor shall any excavation or construc- 208.27 Fort Cobb Dam and Reservoir, Pond (Cobb) Creek, Oklahoma. tion be permitted within the limits of 208.28 Foss Dam and Reservoir, Washita the project right-of-way, nor shall any River, Oklahoma.
    [Show full text]
  • Boysen Reservoir and Powerplant
    Upper Missouri River Basin Water Year 2015 Summary of Actual Operations Water Year 2016 Annual Operating Plans U.S. Department of Interior Bureau of Reclamation Great Plains Region TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARIES OF OPERATION FOR WATER YEAR 2015 FOR RESERVOIRS IN MONTANA, WYOMING, AND THE DAKOTAS INTRODUCTION RESERVOIRS UNDER THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE MONTANA AREA OFFICE SUMMARY OF HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS AND FLOOD CONTROL OPERATIONS DURING WY 2015 ........................................................................................................................ 1 FLOOD BENEFITS ...................................................................................................................... 13 UNIT OPERATIONAL SUMMARIES FOR WY 2015 .............................................................. 15 Clark Canyon Reservoir ............................................................................................................ 15 Canyon Ferry Lake and Powerplant .......................................................................................... 21 Helena Valley Reservoir ........................................................................................................... 32 Sun River Project ...................................................................................................................... 34 Gibson Reservoir ................................................................................................................... 34 Pishkun Reservoir ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of 1976-77 Reservoir Regulation Activities
    MISSOURI RIVER DIVISION OMAHA DISTRICT SUMMARY OF 1976-77 RESERVOIR REGULATION ACTIVITIES ... •''' MISSOlffii RIVFR DIVISION OMAHA DISTRTCT SUMt4!\RY OF 1976-77 RESERVOIR REGUlATION ACTIVITIES SECTIONS PAGE I, PURPOSE AND SCOPB 1 II. RESERVOIRS IN THE OI.'AI!A DISTRICT • 1 III. WATEH SUPPLY 2 IV. RESERVOIR ACCOHPLISH!IENTS 2 v. RESERVOIH OPERATIONS VI. REGULATION PROBLE~lS 6 VII. RESERVOIR REGULATIO!I f.IANUALS 7 VIII. DATA COLLECTIOn 8 IX. HESEfJ\CJI AND STUDIES 8 • x. TRAINING AND METHODS 9 XI. PERSON:t!RI" MID F1JJIDING 9 INCLOSURES 1. Map of Flood Control Dams. 2. Project Data Sheets. 3. Total Number of Flood Control Reservoirs in Omaha District. 4. Water Supply Hap. 5. Regulation Sheets for Past Year. 6. Manual Schedule. 7. Organization Chart, Omaha District. 8. Organization Chart, Reservoir Regulation. DAM NO. 9 - STAGECOACH LAKE OGOHR 197:} A POOl H. 1178.0 H. M.S.L DAM NO. 17 ~ HOMES PARK LAKE DAM NO, 18 · BRANCHED OAK LAKE 1-!ISSOUHI RIVER DIVISION 0: 'A!' A DISTRICT SUVc'ARY OF 19"(6-77 RESERVOIR HEGULATiot! ACTIVITIES I. PURPOSE AND SCOPE. This annual report has been prepared in accordance 1·rith paragraph 12-C of ER 1110-2-llrOO to summarize siEnificant tributary rese>rvoir regulation actjvities of the Omaha District. The period covered is August 1976 through July 1977. II. RESERVOIRS IN TEE m.!f\HA DISTRICT. a. Reservoirs vi.th Flood Control Stor~. There are 33 tributary reservoirs with allocated flood control storage covered in this report. The dams are listed belov. Included are 22 Corps of Engineers dams and 11 of the Bureau of Reclamation da.ros.
    [Show full text]
  • Floods of 1950
    Floods of 1950 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1137 This water-supply paper was printed as separate chapters, A-I UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1954 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Douglas McKay, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director CONTENTS [The letters in parentheses preceding the titles are those used to designate |e papers for separate publication] Page (A) Missouri River basin floods of April-May 1950 in North and outh Dakota, by R. E. Oltman and others___________ __ 1 (B) Floods of 1950 in the Red River of the North and Winnipeg liver basins__________________________________. __ 115 (C) Flood of August 1950 in the Waimea area, Kauai, Hawaii, by t. K. Chun____________________________________ .__ 327 (D) Floods of May-July 1950 in southeastern Nebrasko_______. __ 351 (B) Floods of 1950 in southwestern Oregon and northwestern Calif nia_ 413 (F) Floods of November-December 1950 in the Central Valley Rsin, California_______________________________. __ 505 (G) Floods of 1950 in the upper Mississippi River and Lake Su >rior basins in Minnesota______________________ ____ 791 (H) Floods of November-December 1950 in western Nevada _ 897 (I) Summary of floods in the United States during 1950___ __. __ 957 Missouri River Basin Floods of April-May 1950 in North and South Dakota By R. E. OLTMAN and others FLOODS OF 1950 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1137-A Prepared in cooperation with the North Dakota State Water Conservation Commission, the South Dakota State Engineer, the Corps of Engineers, United States Army, and the United States Bureau of Reclamation UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1951 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Oscar L.
    [Show full text]
  • Shadehill Unit: Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program
    Shadehill Unit: Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program Jedediah S. Rogers Historic Reclamation Projects Bureau of Reclamation 2008 Reformatted, reedited, reprinted by Andrew H. Gahan 2013 Table of Contents Shadehill Unit ..................................................................................................................... 1 Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program ............................................................................... 1 Project Location .............................................................................................................. 1 Historic Setting ............................................................................................................... 2 Investigations .................................................................................................................. 6 Project Authorization ...................................................................................................... 8 Construction History ....................................................................................................... 8 Post-Construction History ............................................................................................. 10 Conclusion .................................................................................................................... 16 Bibliography ..................................................................................................................... 17 Archival Sources ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Missouri River Basin Water Year 2017 Summary of Actual
    Upper Missouri River Basin Water Year 2017 Summary of Actual Operations U.S. Department of Interior Bureau of Reclamation Great Plains Region TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARIES OF OPERATION FOR WATER YEAR 2017 FOR RESERVOIRS IN MONTANA, WYOMING AND THE DAKOTAS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................. i INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... iv MONTANA AREA OFFICE WY 2017 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................... 1 October through December ......................................................................................................... 1 January through March ............................................................................................................... 8 April through June .................................................................................................................... 10 July through September ............................................................................................................ 13 FLOOD BENEFITS...................................................................................................................... 16 UNIT OPERATIONAL SUMMARIES FOR WY 2017 .............................................................. 19 Clark Canyon Reservoir ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dept Interior Construct Sched 1958 (787.6Kb)
    liDrn!Pli\OO'ii'llilrn:~'ii' ®!? 'ii'OOrn: ~~'TI'rn:OO~®OO INFORMATION SERVICE BUREAU OF RECLlMATION For Release AUGUST 5, 1958 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE ANNOUNCED FOR RECW!ATION ~IORK Details of a ' 220,459,000 construction program to be undertaken this fiscal year by the Bureau of Reclamation vera announced today by the Department of the Interior. The program was developed at the annual conference of the Bureau of Reclamation which ended August 1 at Santa Fe, New Mexico, The program is based on the Public Works appropriation bill as passed by the Rouse of Representatives and on such items as the Senate bas concurred in. The appropriation bill is now in conference and the Bureau program is subject t o such changes as the House and Senate conferees may agree on and the Congress approves and as finally signed by the President into law. In the meantime, the Bureau of Reclamation has been functioning since July 1 by authority of a concurrent resolution. Commissioner of Recl amation W. A. Dexheimer said that construction contem­ pl ated by the Bureau this fiscal year ending June 30, 1959, will result in a water supply for 181,500 acres of land not presently irrigated and a supplemental supply for 61,000 acres now receiving an insufficient supply. An additional 61 7 200 kilowatts of hydroelectric generating capacity will be placed in operation this year at multipurpose projects built by the Bureau of Reclamation in the 17 Western states. Details of the programmed construction, by regions, as first announced in Santa Fe, August 1, follow: REGION ONE Little Wood River Project, Idaho.
    [Show full text]
  • Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, Dod § 208.11
    Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, DoD § 208.11 § 208.11 Regulations for use of storage the interest of flood control and navi- allocated for flood control or navi- gation as follows: gation and/or project operation at reservoirs subject to prescription of The operation and maintenance of the rules and regulations by the Sec- dams shall be subject to reasonable rules and retary of the Army in the interest of regulations of the Secretary of the Army in flood control and navigation. the interest of flood control and navigation. NOTE: This Regulation will also be applica- (a) Purpose. This regulation pre- ble to dam and reservoir projects operated scribes the responsibilities and general under provisions of future legislative acts procedures for regulating reservoir wherein the Secretary of the Army is di- projects capable of regulation for flood rected to prescribe rules and regulations in the interest of flood control and navigation. control or navigation and the use of The Chief of Engineers, U.S. Army Corps of storage allocated for such purposes and Engineers, is designated the duly authorized provided on the basis of flood control representative of the Secretary of the Army and navigation, except projects owned to exercise the authority set out in the Con- and operated by the Corps of Engi- gressional Acts. This Regulation will nor- neers; the International Boundary and mally be implemented by letters of under- Water Commission, United States and standing between the Corps of Engineers and project owner and will incorporate the provi- Mexico; and those under the jurisdic- sions of such letters of understanding prior tion of the International Joint Com- to the time construction renders the project mission, United States, and Canada, capable of significant impoundment of and the Columbia River Treaty.
    [Show full text]
  • Shadehill Reservoir Resource Management Plan
    Shadehill Reservoir Resource Management Plan U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation April 2019 Mission Statements The Department of the Interior’s mission is to protect and manage the Nation's natural resources and cultural heritage; provide scientific and other information about those resources; and honor its trust responsibilities or special commitments to American Indians, Alaska Natives, and affiliated island communities. The Bureau of Reclamation’s mission is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF RECLAMATION DAKOTAS AREA OFFICE BISMARCK, NORTH DAKOTA SHADEHILL RESERVOIR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN Perkins County, South Dakota Recommended: __,_ ("""�--=- ---�------­ Date: t./ / s:-1z I 9 Andrea Gue Natural Resource Specialist Dakotas Area Office Concur: Environmental and Resource Division Manager Dakotas Area Office Approved: - Date: lf )zq ------� -� -•--------''=-�-'-- _· _____ h ', Arden Freitag Area Manager Dakotas Area Office Shadehill Reservoir Resource Management Plan Prepared by: Michelle de Leon Scott Hettinger Natural Resource Specialist Environmental and Resource Division Manager DKAO DKAO Will Domagall Patience Mosbrucker Natural Resource Specialist Public Information Specialist DKAO-Rapid City DKAO Andrea Gue Jay Leasure Natural Resource Specialist Natural Resource Specialist DKAO DKAO-Rapid City Jacqueline Henderson Damien Reinhart GIS Specialist
    [Show full text]
  • Hydropower Resource Assessment at Existing Reclamation Facilities March 2011
    RECLAMATION Managing Water in the West Hydropower Resource Assessment at Existing Reclamation Facilities March 2011 Hydropower Resource Assessment at Existing Reclamation Facilities Prepared by United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Power Resources Office U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Denver, Colorado March 2011 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Disclaimer Statement The report contains no recommendations. Rather, it identifies a set of candidate sites based on explicit criteria that are general enough to address all sites across the geographically broad scope of the report. The report contains limited analysis of environmental and other potential constraints at the sites. The report must not be construed as advocating development of one site over another, or as any other site-specific support for development. There are no warranties, express or implied, for the accuracy or completeness of any information, tool, or process in this report. Contents Hydropower Resource Assessment at Existing Reclamation Facilities Contents Page Executive Summary ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report- 1994
    i US Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Annual Report- 1994 Tributary Reservoir Regulation Activities {August 1993 - July 1994) Prepared by: Water Control Section Hydrologic Engineering Branch Engineering Division Omaha, Nebraska December 1994 MISSOURI RIVER DIVISION OMAHA DISTRICT SUMMARY OF 1993-1994 I. PURPOSE AND SCOPE ......................................... 1 II. REFERENCES ............................................... 1 Ill. RESERVOIRS IN THE OMAHA DISTRICT ........................... 1 a. Reservoirs with Flood Control Storage .......................... 1 b. Reservoirs without Flood Control Storage . 2 IV. TRIBUTARY RUNOFF ......................................... 3 V. RESERVOIR ACCOMPLISHMENTS ............................... 11 a. Flood Damages Prevented . 11 b. Recreation Usage . 11 VI. RESERVOIR OPERATION ..................................... 11 a. Previous Years Operation (August 1, 1993 through July 31, 1994) . 11 (1) Corps of Engineers Lakes . 11 (a) Bear Creek Reservoir, Colorado . 11 (b) Chatfield Reservoir, Colorado ..................... 18 (c) Cherry Creek Reservoir, Colorado ................. 18 (d) Bowman-Haley, North Dakota .................... 18 (e) Pipestem, North Dakota ......................... 18 (f) Papillion Creek Basin, Nebraska . 19 (g) Salt Creek Basin, Nebraska . 19 (2) Bureau of Reclamation Dams ......................... 19 Jamestown Dam, North Dakota . 19 (b) Proposed Operations .................................... 19 (1) Corps of Engineers . 19 (a) North Dakota . 20 (b) South Dakota ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Great Lakes Birding Trail Prairie-Chicken and Sharp-Tailed Grouse Leks, Burrowing Welcome Btoirds Ofsouth the Great Lakes Dakota’Sregion
    GREAT LAKES IRDING RAIL MAP LEGEND B T BIRDING TRAIL BIRDING TRAIL SITES 1 Oahe Downstream Recreation Area INTERSTATE 2 Peoria Flats Lakeside Use Area U.S. HIGHWAY 3 Okobojo Point, Cow Creek, Spring Creek Recreation Areas STATE HIGHWAY 4 Little Bend GPA, Lakeside Use Area 5 Stone Lake, Cottonwood Lake, Onida Area GPAs 6 Rice Lake GPA 7 West Whitlock Recreation Area 8 Lake Hiddenwood Recreation Area 9 Lake Pocasse, Pollock Nature Trail 10 Revheim Bay Recreation Area 11 Grand River National Grassland 12 Shadehill, Llewellyn Johns Memorial Recreation Areas 13 Little Moreau GPA 14 Cheyenne River Indian Reservation Birding Loop 15 Gyrfalcon Loop 16 La Framboise Island Nature Area 17 Lewis and Clark Trail 18 Farm Island Recreation Area 19 Arikara GPA 20 West Bend Recreation Area, North Big Bend GPA 21 Harter, Cowan WPAs 22 Brule Bottom GPA 23 White Lake, Humphrey Slough GPA, Humphrey WPA 33 Dog Ear Lake GPA 24 Red Lake GPA, Boyer GPA 34 Buryanek Recreation Area, Buryanek GPA 25 Chain Lake (Holoubek) GPA, Koss WPA 35 Lindley Area, Gammon Bottom GPAs 26 Broken Arrow WPA 36 Byre Bottom GPA, Neugebauer GPA 27 Gray GPA, Platte Creek Recreation Area 37 Carpenter Area GPA 28 Lake Andes National Wildlife Refuge 38 Kiowa GPA 29 Missouri River Bottoms Route 39 Big Bend Dam 30 North Point Recreation Area 40 Lower Brule Indian Reservation Birding Loop 31 Randall Creek Recreation Area, Pickstown GPA at Fort Randall Dam 41 Fort Pierre National Grassland 32 Burke Lake Recreation Area 42 Antelope Creek GPA Baird’s Sparrow Doug Backlund to south along what was the western edge of the vast BIRDING TRAIL MAP LEGEND Pleistocene-age glacier fields.
    [Show full text]