Annual Report 2020

Research centre for socially inclusive energy transitions 01 Chapter 1

Include Annual Report 2020 –

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 2 Introduction Introduction 3 Societies urgently need solutions that will protect the environment and hinder further climate change. Include’s vision is to contribute to making this trans­formation socially inclusive and just. Co-creation of knowledge and learning through experimenting form the cornerstones of our methodology.

Report title Report title 4 Chapter title Chapter title 5 Content

Chapter Chapter Introduction Research training and education 2020 • PhD training, recruitment and projects 64 • Message from the Chair 10 • Master's courses and projects 66 • Report from Tanja, the Head of Include 11 01 • Include summary, 2019 and 2020 12 05

Chapter Include at a glance: goal, rationale, Chapter International cooperation methodology and research plan • Members of the Include Advisory board 75 • Why Include? 18 • In publications 76 • Methodology 19 • Presentations to international audiences 76 • A note on our normative stance 19 • Research applications with international partners 76 • Research plan and WPs 20 • Organisation of Include 28 06 02 • Our partners 34

Chapter Include communication 2020 Chapter In numbers • Events 84 • Include in numbers 38 • Internal events 84

03 07 • External events organised by Include 86

Chapter Research 2020 Chapter Appendices

• Defining and developing projects 44 • Appendix A: Projects defined in 2020 90 • How did COVID-19 influence Include? 48 • Appendix B: Personnel 96 • Glimpses from projects 49 • Appendix C: Financial overview 106 • Partner-led initiatives where Include participates 54 • Appendix D: Publications 108 • Synthesis and cross-cutting innovations 56 04 • Traces of Include: Impact 60 08

Report title Report title 6 Chapter title Chapter title 7 01

Introduction – 01 Chapter 1

Message from Report from Tanja, the Chair the Head of Include

It has been a pleasure to follow Include in its Starting up in a year characterised by the effects of the What constitutes a just society, and how do Include’s approach is, first, to pose a set of questions relat- first year as a social science research centre COVID-19 pandemic created a certain need to improvise on we reach such a state of societal organisation? ed to just transformations; second, to provide knowledge our initial plans. We were particularly sorry that we could about the social effects that would otherwise have been for environmentally friendly energy (Forsk- not present the elaborate and exciting programme for our Within Include’s field of research, what do missed, and third, to test and document the effects of ningssenter for Miljøvennlig Energi – FME launch event, which was to take place on 30th March – this we mean when we say we wish to examine promising solutions on which recommendations could Samfunn). turned out to be 18 days after Norway was locked down. social justice aspects of policies for transform- be based. All this work is carried out in dialogue with our However, as a centre, we handled this proactively, which ative change, such as measures reducing car partners. In many cases, particularly related to our research led to only four percent underspending of the budget. on municipalities, where participatory approaches are driving in cities? Interdisciplinary social science research on energy and On behalf of the board I would like to thank all the Include often practised – as is also the case for many grassroots environmental change is in high demand. Include creates researchers and partners for quickly adapting to the sit- initiatives to reduce consumption – we hypothesise that an important potential for both interdisciplinary work in uation and maintaining an impressive level of activity. socially inclusive processes are key to reaching effective and general and collaboration between ‘soft’ and ‘hard’ dis- Speaking of the board, we are thrilled to have a very active In 2020, Include’s group of researchers and practitioners socially accepted solutions. Our comprehensive approach ciplines. I act as Director of UiO:Energy, a cross-faculty group of board members in Include, and they suggested invested considerable energy in discussing and reflecting will also enhance potentials for learning across sectors, strategic initiative to strengthen interdisciplinary work we adjust some of our plans and immediately start doing on our identity and our characteristics as a research centre for example, whether social justice in the electricity sector on energy at the University of Oslo (UiO). We supported research on the social effects of COVID-19. One result and the concepts and words that we use. One of our key could be strengthened through more inclusive processes. the idea of establishing Include as an FME at UiO because showed that more available home time enables sustain- concepts is social justice, or energy justice when used in the it would allow for a comprehensive approach to energy, able practices, but at the same time, increases material realm of energy, and environmental justice when addressing To begin answering some of these questions, Include has sustainability and social justice. After one year in operation, consumption, for example, on refurbishment. the transformation to an environmentally friendly society. established 39 projects that will address various aspects Include is already facilitating new types of interdisciplinary What these facets of justice share is that they give atten- of the ongoing and needed transformation. It has been a collaborations between senior staff at the departments At the time of writing, it remains uncertain how – and for tion to distributional aspects (who benefits, who bears the great pleasure to note that our partners are just as keen of Technology Systems and Informatics at UiO and social how long – the pandemic will influence our society, and cost?), recognitional aspects (who bears responsibility, as the researchers to dive into these problems and look scientists in Include. With support from the Faculty of thus, the progress and direction of Include in 2021 and whose interests are accounted for and who is invited into for opportunities for change. Let me end by sharing that Natural Sciences, one interdisciplinary PhD has already years to come. What is certain is that our realities have the process of shaping solutions?) and procedural aspects we are also truly happy about Include’s positive reception been recruited, studying how social factors can be inte- somewhat changed, and Include will have to account for (who decides?). To simplify, justice makes us focus on among students and that we have had a hard time select- grated into energy system modelling, and we hope there this when searching for solutions for socially inclusive different levels of government and the situations of dif- ing the best candidates among a range of well-qualified will be more to come. This kind of knowledge is important energy and a just transformation to a low-carbon society. ferent groups, not least, the processes through which new applicants for our new PhD positions. because it brings knowledge about people to the table in solutions are decided and implemented. the shaping of technology, prognoses and policymaking. This report presents the results from Include in 2019 and To return to the opening questions, in my view, Include’s 2020. You are warmly welcomed to take a look and to mission is not to provide a blueprint regarding what con- contact us at any time. stitutes a socially just transformation to a low-emission so- ciety – what is regarded as just depends on whose position is being represented. Rather, our ambition is to conduct critical and solution-oriented research to make policy de- Vebjørn Bakken cisions as informed as possible. To reach this goal, policy UiO:Energy recommendations are important. Ultimately, it remains the responsibility of political parties and elected political Tanja Winther members of parliament, counties and municipalities to Professor and Head of Include weigh different positions, benefits and disadvantages against each other and make decisions.

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 10 Introduction Introduction 11 01 Chapter 1

Include summary, 2019 and 2020

Include workshop November 2019

3. Researchers and partners prior- Glimpses from the project port- In the Energy flows and spaces WP, and densification, and the impacts of itised and identified the first set folio and educational activities we have begun two projects on the mass transportation from construction of projects COVID-19 pandemic. We are inves- sites to landfills. We recently recruit- In the work package (WP) Energy Overall goal tigating the pandemic’s impacts on ed a PhD looking at barriers and op- 4. The partners prioritised the pro- systems in transition, we started pro- urban land use, transport patterns and portunities for upscaling sustainable jects in which they wished to par- jects on bioenergy, wind power, solar people’s everyday lives. Other topics protein consumption in Norwegian ticipate. energy in housing cooperatives, and being addressed are truly public spac- households. the EU Clean Energy Package. Further- Include’s overall goal is to conduct critical research es, sustainable housing, urban sprawl We thoroughly discussed how we more, several sub-projects examine that contributes to a just transformation to a climate should work as a group given the what kinds of end-users will have the and environmentally friendly society via collabora- COVID-19 restrictions, as well as our opportunity to modify their electric- tion between researchers and practitioners. work with external communication ity consumption. This is important and the concepts and words that we because Norwegian grid companies use. We reallocated some of the budget are currently planning to modify their initially allocated to physical gather- electricity tariff structures. We are also ings to recruit young researchers as looking at why municipalities choose assistants. This allowed us to redirect to invest in innovative energy solutions Collaboration In 2019 and 2020, we held many parts of the research to studying the in buildings. Finally, we have recruited By the end of 2020, the consortium workshops and meetings to prioritise effects of COVID-19. one PhD student who will research the consisted of 22 partners and 7 research our research activities. This process, practitioners’ capacity to transition to institutions. Include has 77 active resulting in a project portfolio of 39 energy-relevant practices. In addition, partner participants, 47 associated single projects, was carried out in and in collaboration with the Depart- researchers, 7 completed master’s several steps: ment of Technology Systems at UiO, projects and 2 summer projects. In one PhD student has been recruited addition, 39 people are involved in 1. The partners gave inputs on their and started work on exploring and Include’s administration, communi- knowledge needs improving the representation of social cation and financial reporting. 2. The research group defined a set of factors in energy systems modelling. criteria for project selection

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 12 Introduction Introduction 13 Photo: dronebilder, Olle Jönsson A-lab

01 Chapter 1

Now is the time to set the vision of what is fair, what is socially just, what is inclusive and how we are actually going to practically do that. So the timing of Include seems to be absolutely perfect. It’s starting to ask those questions where, before we get too far down the line and forget the social justice implications, we can do something about it now.

Kirsten Jenkins, Edinburgh University, Include Researcher

Lillestrøm municipality is a partner in Include

In the Municipalities as change agents development area Hovinbyen in col- Socially inclusive energy transition’, cancelled because of restrictions on WP, we are looking at climate budget- laboration with Pådriv, researching carried out as a one-week intensive gatherings during the COVID-19 pan- ing, smaller municipalities’ work on how social sustainability is addressed. course. We also arranged a PhD course demic, digital seminars and workshops just transitions, participatory process- in collaboration with the Department were soon to become the platform for es, local circuits, greening industrial Durham University, UK, leads the of Sociology and Human Geography external meetings. We also developed relations in municipalities and sharing. Learning across borders WP. In partner- at the University of Oslo with a focus new ways of organising these events, A project on Urban Growth Agree- ship with Durham City Council (DCC), on the implications of COVID-19 for a allowing for dialogue between par- ments (UGAs) is underway, looking we are researching whether and how socially inclusive transformations to ticipants. at what significance social inequality DCC’s climate action plan addresses sustainability. has had for the renegotiation of the social inequality. We have also initi- Include as a catalyst for agreements. Two PhDs were recruit- ated a project on COVID-19, focussing Communicating Include interdisciplinary research ed in 2020. One will be researching on the social impacts of the pandemic In 2019 and 2020, we emphasised es- The establishment of Include as a re- the role of municipalities in initiating and the measures implemented. tablishing our channels for internal search centre means that researchers and developing inclusive solutions for communication to provide a basis for from various social science disciplines the circular economy, and the other Overall, we promote cooperation be- communication among researchers are collaborating in interdisciplinary will explore multi-level governance tween researchers and partners across and between researchers and partners. teams. Include is also host to a ‘con- processes within transport policies. WPs and projects. For example, we We also created communication tools vergence environment’ for energy re- have established a group working on such as logos, social media channels search at UiO. Here, researchers from In the Interventions WP, we are car- theoretical concept development and and websites. social and natural science disciplines rying out master’s projects on initia- an ambitious environmental strategy collaborate on the recruitment and tives for reducing food waste in col- (Section 8, Synthesis). Include co-hosted several seminars supervision of PhD students. The first laboration with UiO, Future in Our and workshops for external audiences recruited candidate will research how Hands and several municipalities. We In 2020, we developed an Include in 2020. Although the Include kick-off social factors can be included in en- are planning a project on the urban master course ‘SUM4502 INCLUDE– event, planned for 30 to 31 March, was ergy modelling.

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 14 Introduction Introduction 15 02

Include at a glance – 02 Chapter 2 Photo: Mari Aftret Mørtvedt, CICERO

Include at a glance: goal, rationale, methodology

It is not always the case that the groups consider how environmental and eco- A cornerstone in Include’s method- and research plan that are most clearly articulated and nomic sustainability can be achieved. ology is co-creation of knowledge. heard in the public discourse sur- Hence, we pay particular attention to This notion implies that we produce rounding a given measure represent processes, whether they occur within knowledge through collaboration be- the most severely affected communi- municipalities, when municipalities tween researchers and partners who ties, organisations, groups or individ- meet inhabitants and businesses or represent the public, private and vol- uals. Include’s second contribution as within grassroots initiatives. We hy- untary sectors. We ask a set of critical a research centre is to examine how pothesise that socially inclusive pro- questions that will be examined em- societal and social structures come into cesses will enhance transformation, pirically. Finally, based on the results, play when new measures are intro- but what social inclusion means in we will test and document the effects ­Why Include? duced: Do they reproduce, strengthen practice is an empirical question to of promising solutions and provide The forthcoming transformation to a or balance existing injustices, includ- examine (e.g. whether all groups and recommendations for policy on the Overall goal climate and environmentally friendly ing those related to geographical dif- communities are represented in such forthcoming transformation. society requires more than technolog- ferences and levels of governance? processes and what can be done to ical solutions, top-down regulations ensure that the interests of all groups, A note on our normative stance and innovative market mechanisms. Methodology including vulnerable groups, are ac- Include’s core (normative) values are counted for). Include’s overall goal is to conduct critical research Include, anchored in social science We draw on three tenets associated rooted in the urgent need to protect disciplines, is well equipped to address with the concept of social justice, global and local environments while that contributes to a just transformation to a climate some key challenges associated with which are as follows: how measures ensuring social inclusion and justice. and environmentally friendly society via collabora- the coming transformation: First, pol- affect and involve different groups tion between researchers and practitioners. icy instruments, such as regulations and actors (distributional justice), for energy distribution or subsidies how different groups and actors are associated with selected technologies, involved in decision processes (pro- need to be perceived as relevant and cedural justice) and whose perspec- One of the real strengths of this project is that it also fair to be socially accepted among af- tives are considered and who bears brings in social sustainability as an element. And that’s fected communities and individuals. responsibility (recognitional justice). attached to environmental sustainability, because if we Include takes a comprehensive approach to studying how This would increase the feasibility of Include’s work encompasses different build cities and homes that have to be torn down because climate gas reduction, environmental protection and a implementing the measures. For ex- sectors and disciplines, each represent- systemic energy transition can be achieved in a way that is ample, if regulations and initiatives ing a particular trajectory of concept they don’t work, that’s not environmentally sustainable. coming from national authorities coun- socially inclusive and just. Our name, Include – Research development. Therefore, in our work, If we manage to create social sustainability, then we teract municipalities’ transformative the reader is likely to meet several create cities where there is actual diversity, and a vibrant Centre for Socially Inclusive Energy Transition – reflects actions, this may hinder the overall versions of justice – energy justice, city life, and where it feels safe to be, and where people these ambitions. Include is funded by the Research Council transformation; protests against toll mobility justice and environmental of Norway (RCN) through the Research Centre for Envi- roads illustrate the same point. This justice. Justice is used as an analyti- feel they belong. That’s social sustainability. If we manage issue highlights the importance of in- cal starting point. In addition, Include ronmentally Friendly Energy programme (Forskningssent- that, then we also have more robust cities, which work cluding affected levels of governance, works from a bottom-up approach, over time. er for Miljøvennlig Energi, FME Samfunn), 2020–2027. organisations, groups and individuals envisaging that we must understand in the process of forming transform- people and communities first and then Julie Sjøwall Oftedal, A-lab Architects, Include Partner ative measures.

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 18 Include at a glance Include at a glance 19 02 Chapter 2

Research plan Thematic Overview and Work Packages

Figure: WP Overview

Organisation of the research in INCLUDE: • WP1 Energy systems in transition • WP2 Energy spaces and flows • WP3 Municipalities as change agents • WP4 Interventions • WP5 Learning across borders WORK PACKAGE • WP6 Synthesis, education and communication Restructuring Consumption Institutionalisa- Development of Development of Synthesis and of energy and the built tion of climate practices and practices and working across WP21 systems environment policies tools tools

Electrification Social and Involving the Education versus diversifi- spatial exclusion/ local community cation of national inclusion energy sources THEMES and carriers

Perceptions and Testing plan- Multi-level Communication WP2 WP4 WP5 WP6 implications ning and design governance of EU energy strategies and adaptive integration for co-management Norway

WP3

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 20 Include at a glance Include at a glance 21 02 Chapter 2

WP1 WP2 Energy systems in transition Energy spaces and flows

WP1: Energy systems in WP1 research objectives and experienced by stakeholders WP2: Energy spaces and flows transition Overall objective: Analyse and provide and end users, and the implications WP2 expands the notion of energy for energy justice, the environment WP1 addresses stationary energy sys- recommendations on how the ongoing to include embodied energy, and it and value creation. tems, starting with electricity. The ex- energy transition of the Norwegian has a focus on space and the ‘flow’ isting Norwegian electricity system energy system may increase resource • To explore the ‘pros’ and ‘cons’ of of people and goods, including con- is primarily renewable (hydropower, efficiency and value creation, reduce increased diversification of national sumption at large. By addressing although the share of wind power is emissions and degradation of local energy sources and carriers with public planning and the ways people increasing and solar power is starting environments, and be socially just. respect to energy justice, the envi- live, work, commute and spend their to emerge); thus, a central question ronment and value creation. leisure time, WP2 will examine how is how increased production of ‘new’ Sub-objectives: • To identify the main drivers, barri- the transformation to a climate and renewable electricity will affect the • To understand how changes to a ers and energy justice implications environmentally friendly society can environment and communities and more decentralised, multi-direc- related to Norwegian integration be achieved in a socially just manner. groups within Norway and in coun- tional and digitalised electricity into the European energy markets. This implies studying how plans and tries where resources are extracted. system are determined, justified measures affect people across different Another question is how subsidies and social markers, such as age, gender, regulations affect small generators income and education, and ethnicity, (micro hydro, wind, solar) compared and across different geographies, such with larger hydropower producers. as within cities and towns, suburban Policies for distribution and end-use versus urban; northern versus south- of electricity highlight efficient use ern Norway and Norway versus other of resources and security of supply. countries. Here, Include asks how regulations and measures impact different actors WP2 research objectives Sub-objectives: • To develop and test solutions for and different parts of the population. Overall objective: Analyse the geogra- sustainable and socially inclusive WP1 also addresses the question of • To analyse consumption patterns, phies and everyday practices of direct planning and design strategies diversification of Norway’s energy transport practices and the built and indirect energy use and provide through co-creation with user carriers, starting with a study on environment, and suggest how recommendations to ensure socially partners. bio-energy. Finally, Norway is part environmental sustainability may just and inclusive decarbonised en- of EU directives with implications reached in a socially just manner. ergy spaces. for numerous aspects of its energy • To explore the direct and indirect sector. Here, we aim to understand energy use implications of urban and communicate the implications and regional planning for buildings, of such policies ahead of their imple- public spaces and systems of trans- mentation and how groups engage port, and identify to what extent with EU policies. such planning and design practices lead to social and spatial inclusion and exclusion.

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 22 Include at a glance Include at a glance 23 02 Chapter 2

WP3 WP4 Municipalities Interventions as change agents

WP3: Municipalities as change WP3 research objectives • To understand how municipalities WP4: Interventions agents Overall objective: Analyse and pro- and stakeholders can co-create The aim of Include is not only to study solutions for inclusive processes vide recommendations on how mu- how a socially inclusive and just trans- towards a low-emission society and The role of municipalities in driving nicipalities can develop strategies formation to a climate and environ- the potential outcomes related to the forthcoming transformation while and measures that ensure a socially mentally friendly society is possible social inclusiveness, climate and meeting the needs of different groups inclusive transformation to a climate but also to work jointly with our part- environmental impact and value is the focus of WP3. This includes in- and environmentally friendly society. ners to create concrete tools to achieve creation. vestigating and analysing how the mu- this transformation. WP4 builds on nicipal organisation is prepared and Sub-objectives: • To understand how regional and the research from the other WPs, as working to implement the necessary • To identify practices and strategies national levels can contribute to well as the knowledge and experience changes, how they involve the local that can be adopted to institutional- realising municipalities’ potential of Include’s partners, to develop, test community in their work and how the ise socially inclusive transformative to act as agents for socially inclu- and evaluate innovative interventions different levels of government collab- measures and policies. sive transformative measures and for societal transformation. Co-cre- orate to plan and implement socially policies. ation is a core pillar of the work in inclusive transformative actions. Al- WP4: The proposed interventions are though the outcomes of transformative co-designed with Include’s partners measures and policies for different and other stakeholders and tested, groups and actors will be addressed, evaluated and revised in continuous we will pay particular attention to dialogue with these stakeholders. In the processes leading to the imple- addition, many of the interventions mentation of those measures. Crucial focus on participatory approaches Sub-objectives: questions asked relate to which groups that encourage citizens to take part • To explore how citizen participa- and actors are involved, in what way in the co-creation of social and en- tion and co-creation can be fostered and for what reasons. vironmental practices in their local using digital tools, for example, so- communities. cial media, digital representation, energy simulations, GIS systems WP4 research objectives and mobile media. Overall objective: Together with user • To understand how local organi- partners, co-design, experiment and sations can be configured to im- evaluate innovative measures with the prove socially inclusive planning aim of reducing emissions and cre- to achieve a climate and environ- ating a climate and environmentally mentally friendly society. friendly society. • To identify tools, methods and approaches needed for the devel- opment of meta-level inquiry syn- thesising experiences from the dif- Local community initiatives. Mini-public library at Snåsa and ferent interventions for further use. “hugging corner” in Nordfjordeid

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 24 Include at a glance Include at a glance 25 02 Chapter 2

WP5 WP6 Learning across borders Synthesis, education and communication

WP5: Learning across borders for UK energy policy and regulations, WP5 research objectives WP6: Synthesis, education and WP6 objectives: In this WP, we ask what Norway and on the other, the weak financial Overall objective: Through comparative communication 1. To provide a synthesis of our re- and policy position of British local au- can learn from the United Kingdom. research in Norway and the United WP6 will involve all researcher part- search findings. thorities in a highly centralised polity. Durham County Council has recent- Kingdom, analyse lessons learned ners in synthesizing the research find- This explains Durham’s focus on mit- 2. Address cross-cutting issues for ly declared a climate emergency and and provide recommendations for a ings and address cross-cutting issues. igating the energy effects of poverty all Include partners. proposed an action plan to implement socially inclusive transformation to Further, it will develop educational and the position of vulnerable groups 3. To contribute to research training measures to mitigate greenhouse gas a low-emission society. programs and research training of in their climate plan. The starting point and education within Include’s fo- emissions. Several Norwegian munic- relevance to Include’s focus area. Fi- for developing climate plans in Norway cus areas by developing PhD and ipalities have also declared a climate Sub-objectives: nally, under this work package com- tends to be a more focussed concern master’s courses and creating a emergency and developed climate • To identify the strategic objectives munication between research and user with emission cuts, based on more sense of community among in- action plans. What distinguishes the of UK municipalities regarding the partners will be secured, and results abundant local powers than are avail- volved students. British response from the Norwegian implementation of a socially inclu- disseminated to our target groups. The able in the United Kingdom. WP5 aims one is, on the one hand, the extent sive and just transformation. target groups for Include’s commu- 4. To ensure communication between to draw on UK experiences to reflect research and user partners and dis- of deprivation and inequality in the • To carry out case studies with DCC nication activities are the scientific on how Norwegian local plans for cli- seminate the results to the scientific United Kingdom, where energy vul- focussing on knowledge transfer community; partners and stakeholders; mate emissions might more strongly community, partners and stake- nerability (sometimes referred to as in the context of the tensions/cor- and the general public. Part of the live drawing reflecting discussions integrate a concern for social justice. holders, and the public at large. energy poverty) is a significant issue respondences arising between de- from Include’s communication workshop, carbonisation and social justice and by Mikael Noguchi considering the role of civil society groups and other actors in shaping new initiatives. • Together with investigators and others from the research consor- tium, to contribute to the devel- opment of a curriculum targeted at public planners in Norwegian municipalities.

Durham city centre. Photo by Charlie Green on Unsplash

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 26 Include at a glance Include at a glance 27 02 Chapter 2

Organisation of Include

Organisational structure Include’s Board

Include

ANNUAL MEETING Support

ADVISORY BOARD Vebjørn Bakken Kristin Halvorsen Iver Neumann UiO CICERO FNI BOARD COMMUNICATION

ADMIN & FINANCE HEAD OF INCLUDE EDUCATION FME COORDINATOR

MANAGEMENT GROUP DATA MANAGEMENT

Matteo Chiesa Bjørn Erik Nordby Henriette Rognlien UiT Asker kommune Hurdal kommune WP1 WP2 WP3 WP4 WP5 WP6

Julie Sjøwall Oftedal Christoffer Klyve Inger Lise Blyverket A-lab FIVH Forbrukerrådet

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 28 IncludeOrganisation at a glance of Include Organisation of Include 29 02 Chapter 2

Organisation of Include

Management group Communication and research support

Tanja Winther Hege Westskog Tor Håkon Jackson Inderberg Iris Leikanger Øyvind Sundet Astrid Arnslett Head of Include FME Coordinator and Lead WP3 Lead WP1 SUM, UiO SUM, UiO CICERO

Per Gunnar Røe Ole Smørdal Simone Abram Jan-Tore Berghei Anna Valberg Bente Bakken Lead WP2 Lead WP4 Lead WP5 OsloMet FNI UiO:Energy, UiO

Hilde Holsten Hanne Sparre-Enger Erik Berge Lead communication TØI ISS, UiO

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 30 IncludeOrganisation at a glance of Include Organisation of Include 31 02 Chapter 2

Admin and finance staff Admin and finance staff

Marius Bergh Knut Kjæreng Terje Røysum Kari-Anne Ulfsnes Ilze Gehe Elise Prytz Hafskjold SUM, UiO SUM, UiO SUM, UiO IPED, UiO ISV, UiO CICERO

Kristoffer Ring Lisbeth Kjelstrup Espen Refstie SUM, UiO TØI TØI Suzanne Tærud Day Sigrid Rian Song Claes Lykke Ragner CICERO CICERO FNI

Stephanie Schmölzer Galina Loginova Trine Labahå ISS, UiO ISS, UiO IPED, UiO Mariann Opaker Gøril Heimland Christian Hansen OsloMet UiT UiT

Stina Petersen ISS, UiO Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 32 IncludeOrganisation at a glance of Include Organisation of Include 33 02 Chapter 2

Partners Partners

The Centre for Development and the Environment (SUM) at the University of Oslo is the host for Include. Our six other research partners are both universities and research institutes. Durham University, UK, is our dedicated inter- national partner. Further, Include collaborates with 22 committed user partners representing the Norwegian public, private and civil sectors. Our user partners are actively involved in the centre’s activities through the FME Board, where they are in the majority, through reference groups under each WP and in project groups for specific projects. They are also invited to take part in FME work- shops, lunch seminars and communication activities, sharing knowledge that is crucial for the development of user-relevant research and results.

Research institutions

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 34 Include at a glance Organisation of Include 35 03

In numbers – 03 Chapter 3

Include in numbers

Overall Projects

Budget: 8 NOK 166 535 000 39 11 Projects Cross-WP Years (of 39 projects) initiated Projects initiated in 2020 19 050 000 12 Partners 11 Spin-off applications: 10 Funding 51 444 000 8 years 95 000 000 Research institutions RCN 19 8 2 2 2 Submitted Accepted

WP1 WP2 WP3 WP4 WP5 WP6 Team Projects initiated in 2020

Applications with international partners Education

7 Collaboration with international institutions in submitted Research applications 2020 7 institutions 47 56 Nordic PhD students recruited Researchers European Master's theses delivered Participants Outside Europe 5 Student summer projects MA course

77 23 Partner 2 representatives 1 22 3 User partner institutions Nordic European Outside Europe Education 2020 Collaboration with international Education 2020 institutions in submitted applications 2020

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 38 In numbers In numbers 39 03 Chapter 3

Include in numbers Presentations

Academic publications International academics 119 20 Book Presentations chapters 3 Presentations 21 by target Norwegian audience 19 Academic academics Academic publications 78 publications 5 Partners (peer reviewed articles Inputs to policy and and stakeholders and book chapters) planning processes 16 Peer reviewed articles Online outreach

Media contributions 400 25 500 346 135 Radio 1 Newsletter Website views Followers Followers recipients on Facebook on Twitter 46 3 TV (NRK) Podcast Magazine Media 5 13 External events contributions Internal meetings and woMeetings,rkshops events and workshops Management group meetings Media 14 contributions ChartExternal with eventsstatistics Internal meetings and workshops* Management group meetings 12 Blog 9 Newspaper 12 5

Meetings*including events 1 annual and meeting workshops and 3 board meetings.

Include annual report 2020 including 1 annual meeting and 3 board meetings. Include annual report 2020 40 In numbers In numbers 41 04

Research 2020 – 04 Chapter 4

WP1 Energy Systems in Transition

Restructuring of Electrification versus Perceptions and implications energy systems diversification of national of EU energy integration energy sources and carriers for Norway THEMES

Flexible electricity use (3 projects) Bioenergy potential Clean Energy Market Package Research Winds of change Municipalities as energy pioneers Collective and tenant prosumers

2020 PROJECTS PhD: Consumers’ sustainable energy practices

PhD: Energy system modelling

In 2020, we defined and developed 39 projects in Include, where 11 projects are WP2 Highlight 1 collaborations across our WPs. In most of the projects, researchers and partners Energy Spaces and Flows Establishing a rich project collaborate closely throughout the research process. Some projects are also partner led. portfolio We held many workshops and meetings to prioritise our research activities. This Consumption and the Social and spatial Testing planning and process was carried out in several steps built environment exclusion/inclusion design strategies Through extensive dialogue with the partners, as follows: THEMES we have developed 39 projects in Include. These comprise larger, multiple-year collabo- 1. The partners gave inputs on their ration projects, researcher projects of shorter Sustainable housing development Epidemic vulnerability and urban Inclusive and sustainable planning knowledge needs land-use (Vestre Billingstad) duration, and master’s and summer projects. 2. The research group defined a set of In addition, we started up a doctoral project for one PhD student and recruited five others. criteria for project selection Everyday Covid-19 Urban sprawl The projects range widely, but all focus on 3. Researchers and partners prioritised

inclusive transformation processes. and identified the first set of projects PROJECTS PhD: Consumption Mass landfills 4. The partners prioritised the projects in which they wished to participate Smart and positive sattelite cities Please see Appendix A for a list of projects defined in 2020 with short descriptions Truly public spaces of each project. Electric vehicles and solar prosumption

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 44 Research 2020 Research 2020 45 04 Chapter 4

WP3 WP5 Municipalities as Change Agents Learning Across Borders

Institutionalisation of climate Involving the local Multi-level governance and Transformative policies at the municipal level in the UK policies community adaptive co-management THEMES THEMES

PhD: Insitutionalisation of municipal Re-making consumption Urban Growth Agreements Durham Climate Action Plan Corona strategies climate policies

Climate budgeting (with PhD) Local circuits PhD: Multi-level governance through UGAs PROJECTS

Greening industrial relations in Peripheric public participation Norwegian municipalities PROJECTS Network for local circuits Smaller municipalities WP6 Synthesis, Education and Competence building Education Communication PhD: Circular economy and the role of the municipality

Synthesis and working Education Communication across THEMES

WP4 Conceptual development Master’s course SUM4502 Channels for internal communication Interventions Environmental strategy PhD course in collaboration with ISS Events PROJECTS Travel form Communication strategy

Development of practices and tools Communicating Include to target groups THEMES

Social sustainability and co-creation in urban planning (Hovinbyen) PROJECTS

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 46 Research 2020 Research 2020 47 04 Chapter 4

Include is relevant to the solar power industry in several ways. We want to try to understand why the solar power industry is growing as fast as it is in Norway, almost with- out any public stimulus. It’s important to understand why things are happening in a positive direction as well, not just the negative sides.

Ola Rostad, Norwegian Solar Energy Cluster, Include Partner

Glimpses from projects Highlight 2 Everyone onboard! Removing barriers to self-production for collective residents Contributing to regulations Prosumerism is one of the key pillars of the energy transi- tion, and it has been a driver for decarbonisation in many for future wind power countries and regions, including Germany and California. development in Norway Individuals and households that produce electricity – pro- sumers – offer entirely new possibilities for the organisation of the electricity system. However, prosumerism also opens up new questions about inequalities and distributional injustice along several dimensions. Policymakers and stakeholders are increasingly recognising that existing Research at FNI has laid the foundation for new support mechanisms and current regulations for prosumers Adapting to COVID restrictions. Screenshot applications for concessions for wind power favour already privileged homeowners. from internal workshop, Communication seminar 8. october 2020. development in Norway that will be processed This study investigates the regulatory challenges associ- according to the Planning and Building Act. ated with involving ‘collective residents’ in the prosumer Lars H. Gulbrandsen (FNI) shared these results segment. The background is the large and underexploited How did COVID-19 influence Include? projects started early, and we have also had master’s stu- in the TV programme The Debate (Debatten) potential for solar photovoltaics (PV) on houses where Include officially started up in January 2020, and the centre dents who have had to change their plans for fieldwork. on NRK. Compared with the current situation, several households share the roof. We investigate the was only slightly over two months old when the COVID- Interviews have been carried out digitally. This has worked where decisions on wind power development Norwegian case, where this potential is particularly large 19 pandemic hit. Even so, the coronavirus outbreak and relatively well, particularly because we already know the are made by national authorities, the govern- for housing cooperatives. Because of missing incentives the restrictions associated with it did not overly hinder research areas well for some projects. However, academ- ment’s proposal appears to give more and even disadvantageous regulations, the large potential Include’s activities in 2020. We used many resources to ically, this is an issue in terms of gaining insights into the autonomy to local governments in questions embedded in the shared rooftops of such cooperatives context and being able to stay in places over time to absorb keep up our activity level, do things in new ways and of constructing these facilities. remains largely untapped in Norway. The study analyses achieve good processes for developing projects, commu- the context and carry out more spontaneous interviews. current barriers and possible solutions to these problems. nication and administration. The clearest consequences The project will be finalised in 2021. of the pandemic and the changes it has brought have been As a whole, the COVID-19 restrictions have brought both the cancelling of in-person events, meetings and fieldwork. challenges and some new opportunities. One positive Our kick-off event had to be cancelled entirely. We have impact is that the partners outside Oslo (e.g. in Tromsø) saved funds on cancelling in-person events, which have have been able to participate in events on ‘equal footing’ partially been used to strengthen the research group by with participants from the Oslo area rather than being the hiring research assistants (particularly for researchers only ones participating over Zoom (and therefore, easily with young children). The funds that were freed up have being overlooked or not hearing everything that is said). also been used to start new projects (COVID-19 research We have initiated projects that study the impacts of the in Norway and Durham and a project on the environmen- pandemic on everyday life and mobility. This is an inter- tal impact of travel serving as a foundation for Include’s esting topic for Include because it gives us information on environment strategy). These reallocations explain how how practices change, are sustained and can potentially be we have been able to keep our activities at a level that is taken forward once the pandemic is over. The restrictions close to what was budgeted. have led to increased digital competence and experience with carrying out data collection digitally. We will take As the centre is in its starting phase, and much of our time these experiences with us and build on them when the Roan Wind Farm, Fosen, Norway, Photo: by Statkraft has gone to planning activities, there has been relatively COVID-19 restrictions are lifted. little need for in-person fieldwork in 2020. However, some

Co-housing at Findhorn eco-village, Scotland

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 48 Research 2020 Research 2020 49 04 Chapter 4 Photo by Thomas de LUZE on Unsplash

So far, the data collected show that there are political and regulatory barriers, as well as barriers related to the internal organisation of collective residents/cooperatives. An overall Highlight 3 distinction can be made between external and internal barriers. We identify the following external barriers: • The fee on electricity and grid tariffs amounts to a large share of the total electricity price (often more than Revision of the zero-growth 50%) that consumers pay. Single-house residents with goal (ZGG) in accordance solar panels are exempted from these fees. Consumers that produce electricity with a different technology are with Include researchers’ exempt from the electricity fee. However, collective recommendations residents with solar panels are not exempt, primarily because they cannot use the self-produced electricity ‘behind the meter’. This is probably the largest eco- With the toll-road agreement that was estab- nomic barrier for cooperatives today. According to EU lished before the municipal and county election law, each consumer is entitled to choose an electricity provider; therefore, the distribution system operators in 2019, it was decided that the zero-growth (DSOs) also own the grid within the housing cooperative. goal (ZGG) would be revised; this development The regulators could have exempted cooperatives from can have several social and emissions-related these fees. However, they argue that it is difficult to set consequences. During work on the revisions the demarcation of ‘behind the meter’ at a different of the ZGG (fall 2019–spring 2020), Anders COVID-19: The impact on everyday lives energy transition. Some of these responses could reduce place than where it actually is (i.e. at the entrance of Tønnesen (CICERO) actively contributed to and mobility energy footprints (e.g. teleworking/video-conferencing, enhanced health concerns and interest in active transport each apartment). sharing research related to this process. The COVID-19 pandemic is addressed in two Include- mode usage), but others may have opposite effects (e.g. • It is difficult for cooperatives to apply for support from With Aud Tennøy (TØI), he wrote an opinion projects. Everyday COVID-19 addresses the impact of corona­ preferences for dispersed living, reduced attractiveness of Enova1 because the organisation does not offer targeted piece (Dagbladet) and gave presentations in virus on the everyday lives of citizens, whereas Epidemic public transport, enhanced car dependency). Moreover, any support arrangements for this type of actor. Today, vulnerability and urban land use addresses the implications of several different arenas, including the National of these structural changes may reinforce existing divides ENOVA only has specific support programmes for sin- the COVID-19 pandemic for urban land use and transport. Transport Plan (NTP) conference in December in society or create new ones. We explore the hypothesis gle-family houses and business actors. 2019. We note that the changes to the ZGG of splintering urbanism in relation to the transformations The Everyday COVID-19 project addresses how our habits • It is not appealing to participate in the green certificate were made in accordance with the recommen- taking place following the COVID-19 situation. connected to food, travel and leisure have changed during schemes for collective residents because the costs of dations given by Include’s researchers. the coronavirus crisis and which of these changes will participating are too high. Preliminary results from these two projects show that the remain even after the pandemic. By exploring the lived • Cooperatives must apply to obtain permission from the COVID-19 pandemic changed our daily mobility. Some domestic experiences of different social groups during municipality to install solar panels, whereas single-fam- changes have had positive environmental implications, the COVID-19 crisis, the project produces new insights ily houses are exempt from this rule. including the increased use of bicycles and long-distance into how ruptures in socio-material systems can work travel being replaced by digital meetings. In contrast, oth- to fundamentally alter or reinforce routine consumption er changes, such as avoidance of public transport and We identify the following internal barriers: practices – and for whom. The findings are directly rele- increased use of private cars, can have negative envi- • In the organisation of cooperatives, most residents need vant to science and policy concerned with understanding ronmental effects. The question is which of the changed to agree to make changes to the parts of the houses that everyday consumption. are joint property. patterns will persist after the pandemic. The figures also hide large differences between different social groups and • With today’s electricity prices (and the aforementioned The project on Epidemic vulnerability and urban land use geographical areas. The studies indicate that more available external barriers), it does not necessarily make sense addresses the short-, mid- and long-term implications time enables sustainable practices, but at the same time, to install solar from a purely economic perspective. for urban land use and transport in the face of the 2020 it increases material consumption in terms of , for exam- COVID-19 pandemic. The project is formulated in response • The residents in a cooperative are often a mixed group ple, refurbishment. Informants indicate that they want to to the board’s request to address COVID-19 implications of people with different perspectives. For older people, continue the practice with the home office, have less work for Include. The project highlights distributional justice it is not so attractive to invest in a technology that takes travel and spend more time in the local community after dimensions of how pandemic risks are unevenly distributed decades to pay off. In addition, other residents might the pandemic. An important task for policy and planning in across the (peri-/sub-)urban landscape, with differential im- have short perspectives on how long they are going to urban areas will be to prevent pandemics from reinforcing pacts for different population categories and social groups. stay in the house. existing inequalities while at the same time utilising the In addition, the potential decision-making responses by opportunities for developing more sustainable practices. citizens and policymakers to COVID-19 investigated in this project have strong implications for decarbonisation and 1. Enova SF is owned by the Ministry of Climate and Environment and contributes funding to projects reducing greenhouse gas emissions, developing energy and climate technology and strengthening the security of the supply.

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 50 Research 2020 Research 2020 51 04 Chapter 4

Urban growth agreements (UGAs): inhabitants have been involved in the process and how Handling urban and regional inequalities inhabitants have been informed about the presumed ben- efits resulting from UGA financing. This gives inequalities The area of Oslo known In 2018/19, Norway witnessed massive resistance of access, connectivity and level of participation, posing as Hovinbyen against toll-road payment and state involvement in local stern tests for the UGA-structure. land-use and transport affairs. This initiated a process of renegotiation of the UGAs, a mechanism initiated by Preliminary results from the project show that the signifi- the central government to achieve sustainable cities in cant resistance against toll roads at Nord-Jæren may largely Norway. In this project, we analyse the public and polit- be attributed to high toll-road fees and rush hour charges. ical resistance to UGAs and ask the following questions: In addition, the resistance may result from a fragmented 1. To what extent and how were social inequalities part urban structure and limited supply of public transport of the renegotiation process of the UGAs? solutions. According to our informants, the distributional 2. To what extent and how do the renegotiated UGAs consequences of tolls are primarily a question of the pos- reflect social inequality dimensions? sibilities to use alternative transport modes rather than The study will also give recommendations on how social private cars, not a question of the ability to pay the tolls. justice could be dealt with in the UGAs. The project will The degree of opposition to UGAs is also related to the be finalised in 2021. characteristics of public transport solutions. In the Trond- heim region, the resistance to tolls was significantly lower The UGAs and the ZGG are currently under revision compared with Nord-Jæren. The Metrobus solution chosen (2018–2020), and we study them in relation to contextual in the Trondheim region required fewer interventions in differences within Norway. There are variations regarding the urban area and less resumption of private property Co-constructing inclusive Hovinbyen. urban structures and car dependency, both between urban compared with the Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system in Pre-project on triggers and barriers for broad Nord-Jæren, which required a separate bus lane. Our re- regions and within different parts of a given region. Fur- participation in Hovbinbyen Highlight 4 thermore, the political landscapes differ between the urban sults illustrate that the level of tolls must be adapted to the regions, including the respective populations’ (historical) opportunities for using alternatives to the private car in Oslo is one of the fastest growing cities in Europe. Hovin- willingness to make use of car-restrictive measures. Linked the different city regions. The sizes of the different UGAs Award to Include byen is an area designated by the city council as the next to this, there are differences in how the UGAs and the toll- and their projects must also be dimensioned according to growth area in Oslo and represents the largest urban de- researcher road structures have evolved, how and to what extent the these contextual differences. velopment area in the city. The planning horizon is 30–50 years. The area comprises 11 km², making it almost as large as the whole of Oslo’s existing inner city. The goal Marianne Zeyringer (UiO) won third place in the of this project is to identify triggers and barriers for broad Nordic Energy Challenge 2020 competition by participation and system innovation in urban development Nordic Energy Research. Her project will com- processes. In it, we identify the main stakeholders and bine scientific and artistic methods, and has the their level of involvement and power in ongoing urban title Unlocking the renewable energy potential development processes. The project also seeks to identifies existing strategies for adapting to climate change in Hov- in the Nordics – Energy systems modelling as inbyen. The pre-project is connected to ongoing initiatives a tool to understand opposition and increase in Hovinbyen related to Vollebekk Fabrikker and OBOS acceptance and collaboration. bostart. A central aim of the pre-project is to identify and define larger projects to be started in 2022.

Vollebekk Fabrikker is part of the Vollebekk urban de- velopment project, where large parts of the area will be transformed into a greener district with a focus on the envi- ronment and social values in addition to economic growth. Vollebekk Fabrikker may be regarded as an arena for social innovation, an important facilitator for new initiatives and a place where stakeholders may meet, share experienc- es and develop new partnerships. In the pre-project, we have had a particular interest in Vollebekk Fabrikker as a context for informal learning, and we have worked with non-governmental organisations (NGOs), school owners, teachers and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) Marianne Zeyringer to regard this space as a potential hub for the establish- ment of various initiatives for sustainability in education. City bicycles in Stavanger

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 52 Research 2020 Research 2020 53 04 Chapter 4

Partner-led initiatives where Include participates

Youth climate leadership Network for local circuits Rådhus Asker Asker municipality is initiating two new pilots focussing Our partner KS runs a network for municipalities focussed on ‘Youth climate leadership’. The pilots will address sus- on local transformation to a low-emission society consist- tainable development of places in Asker, using such tools ing of 12 dedicated municipalities. The network is based as Barnetråkk – a digital tool where children are invited to on R&D work on how municipalities may contribute to share how they use their local environments with local transforming local communities towards a low-emission planners, which will extend school–municipal planning society. The network is called ‘Kortreist Kvalitet’ (KK), collaboration and strengthen the local youth council’s which can be translated as ‘local circuits with quality’. involvement in area planning and climate action planning. The Include partners insam, CICERO, SUM and Civitas form the secretariat for the network and are responsible for running the network with KS. Include’s finances cover researchers’ work. The network activities consist of both network seminars and bottom-up work with municipal- ities on specific focus areas or pilots. The network also receives funding from Klimasats (a programme funded by the Norwegian Environment Agency – also a partner in Include). In 2020, we arranged two network seminars digitally because of corona restrictions. The first seminar was aimed at discussing the coronavirus crisis and sus- tainable crisis management. The second was arranged in collaboration with our partner Asker, concentrating on their work on climate mitigation and measures for sustainable consumption. Between these seminars, the secretariat had meetings with the participating municipalities to follow up on their work.

Competence building on climate transformation in municipalities Our partner Asker leads a project funded by Klimasats As a new research arena, Include will and partners to build competence on climate transforma- tion. This is a pre-project aimed at establishing a model work with the same things that we’re for competence building on transformative change to- trying to do right now, to create holistic wards municipal administrative personnel and politicians strategies for sustainability where housing, (through trainings for local elected officials). KS, CICERO, mobility, food and consumption are insam, USN and UiO are partners. Include finances cover researchers’ work. The project started in 2020 and will included. be finalised in 2021. Rolf Jacobsen, Gaia Arkitekter, Include Researcher The geographical centre of Norway. The KK-network focuses on local circuits in a country characterised by large distances.

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 54 Research 2020 Research 2020 55 04 Chapter 4

Synthesis and cross-cutting innovations

Environmental strategy and travel form In 2020, we developed Include’s environmental strategy. It sets guidelines for the participating research institutions and those delivering services to the FME to ensure that the activities are carried out in the most environmentally friendly way possible. The objectives are as follows: • To ensure that the centre’s practices rapidly adopt and promote best practice environmental solutions as appropriate. • To increase awareness among participants in Include, their host institutions and the wider community about environmentally friendly practices.

In Include’s activities, travel and food consumption are two domains with a high environmental impact that may potentially be reduced. When travelling, Include researchers and administrative staff should look for the most environ- mentally friendly way of travelling. For instance, they can actively deciding against some work travels and find alter- natives to flying, especially for travels in Northern Europe. While travel primarily relates to emissions, the realm of food concerns other kinds of environmental impacts (e.g. negative effects of pesticides and fertilisers). Include’s code of conduct when ordering or serving food is to select sustainable menus that reflect local and seasonal availabil- ity and include vegan, vegetarian and organic options, as well as reducing food waste by avoiding excess ordering.

We wanted to do this thoroughly, with the prospect that Sustainable modes of transport: Head of Include, Tanja Winther other organisations could take inspiration from our work. and FME Coordinator, Hege Westskog, traveling from Oslo to Working with concepts and developing We organised a short project in 2020 to establish a system Tromsø by train and bus. a vocabulary for communication for tracking emissions from travel undertaken by Include staff. The resulting travel registration form follows Include’s We established a group of researchers, led by Kacper I think Include is really important because guidelines for calculating carbon emissions, which consider Szulecki, to work with theoretical concepts (justice, de- we need a better understanding of how we indirect emissions from different modes of transportation, mocracy, inclusiveness) and explore how different dis- a factor that is often omitted from these kinds of calculators. ciplines understand these notions. The purpose is to lay manage to achieve changes in society. Include researchers are expected to fill in this form when the groundwork for synthesis work involving different When we’re now going to decarbonise the they travel on behalf of Include. Additional costs incurred disciplines in Include. Two outputs resulted in 2020: First, world and Norway, we need to understand from choosing sustainable modes of transportation, such as Szulecki started to co-author an article on energy justice additional hotel nights and more expensive travel options, and energy democracy with Kirsten Jenkins and others. – where are the barriers, and how can we are covered by Include’s budget. Second, via internal workshops, the whole consortium stimulate that development? And if we’re participated in discussions about key concepts, which going to understand this, we need to bring will result in an Include glossary in Norwegian in 2021. along everyone, and that means that we need to find mechanisms that work much better than a lot of the mechanisms we have today.

Ola Rostad, Norwegian Solar Energy Cluster, Include Partner

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 56 Research 2020 Research 2020 57 04 Chapter 4

Work with innovation and documentation Cross-WP collaboration of impact Working across WPs to ensure synthesis and collaboration Highlight 5 Innovations and experiments will become a core activity is important to spur interdisciplinarity and help develop in WP4. As initially planned, researchers and partners a comprehensive understanding of transformation. The collaborated closely in 2020 to identify the first set of Include team regularly meets to share perspectives and projects in Include. In later years, when we have empirical research results. In addition, 11 of the projects that were Contribution to further results available and the partners have established a more defined in 2020 are designed as collaborations across work developing the European enduring relationship, we will identify experimental zones packages. These projects address topics that are relevant and test out promising solutions. to the goals of two or more WPs and involve researchers Research Area (ERA) attached to different WPs in Include. Documenting the impact of critical social science research is a general challenge. Observable impacts can be in the Cross-WP projects defined in 2020: In the spring of 2020, Include researchers form of changes in policy, regulations and processes, but were invited by the Ministry of Education and 1. The municipality as energy pioneer (WP1 and WP3) attribution is often a problem because there can be many 2. Winds of change (WP1 and WP3) Research to contribute inputs to Norway’s drivers for change at work simultaneously. response to the EU Commission’s work on 3. Sustainable housing developments (WP2 and WP3) the new vision for the European Research To document Include’s impact, we will largely rely on the 4. Mass landfills – a pilot study (WP2 and WP3) Area (ERA). In the Ministry’s response to assessment and feedback from individual decision makers 5. Education (WP3 and WP4) the EU, several of Include’s inputs were put and people representing other groups. In 2020, in situa- 6. Re-making consumption (WP3 and WP2) forward; these are as follows: the need to pay tions where we were invited to comment on policies or 7. Local circuits (WP3 and WP2) attention to the distribution of burdens in the research strategies, we asked the person who invited us transition to low-emission society; the need to signal whether and how our inputs had been used after 8. Peripheral public participation (WP3, WP4 and WP2) for perspectives from the social sciences to we made our contribution. We systematically register such 9. Hovinbyen – pre-study (WP4 and WP2) feedback in Include’s internal record AirTable. be given sufficient attention; and the need for 10. Durham climate action plan (WP5 and WP3) user involvement. The RCN has expressed Tanja Winther and Ole Smørdal regularly take part in the 11. Corona strategies (WP5 and WP3) that these inputs will be important in relation FME Innovation Forum, currently led by NTRANS/NTNU. to goals and prioritisation in the upcoming Participating in three meetings in 2020 gave us insight For more information about these projects, please see RCN portfolio on energy, transport and low into the ways other centres handle impact documentation. Appendix A. emissions. This illustrated to us that the impact criteria developed for natural sciences and engineering do not always apply/ make sense for social science research. Hence, impact criteria for social science need to be developed separately.

The project re-making consumption looks at local initiatives for sustainable consumption

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 58 Research 2020 Research 2020 59 04 Chapter 4

Traces of Include: Impact

Contribution to regulations for future wind the National Framework for Wind Power on Land and power development in Norway the White Paper on Wind Power. The researchers at FNI have also been important contributors to the political Research at FNI has laid the foundation for new appli- discussion on wind power, the concession system and cations for concessions for wind power development in the laws, by developing an evidence-based foundation, Norway that will be processed according to the Planning producing documentation and giving perspectives, and Building Act. Lars H. Gulbrandsen (FNI) shared these which have been especially important to actors who results in the TV programme The Debate (Debatten) on NRK. are based outside the areas where wind power facilities Compared with the current situation, where decisions on are located’. wind power development are made by national authorities, the government’s proposal appears to give more autonomy to local governments in questions of constructing these Inputs to Norwegian Water Resources and facilities. Energy Directorate’s (NVE’s) development of energy models Revision of the ZGG in accordance with Include Tor Håkon J. Inderberg (FNI) and colleagues have been in researchers’ recommendations dialogue with NVE to discuss how social factors can be With the toll-road agreement that was established before handled in energy modelling, for example, in relation to the municipal and county election in 2019, it was decided acceptance of wind power projects. Include is supporting that the ZGG would be revised; this development can have a PhD project on this topic. NVE is interested in taking the several social and emissions-related consequences. During results and methods into use when they have been further work on the revisions of the ZGG (fall 2019–spring 2020), developed and tested. Anders Tønnesen (CICERO) actively contributed to sharing Development of capacity among school students Inputs to Durham City Council (DCC) with research related to this process. With Aud Tennøy (TØI), Inputs to Asker municipality’s work on new in Asker municipality to reduce food waste (with respect to planning of climate measures he wrote an opinion piece (Dagbladet) and gave presenta- forms of housing Future in our hands) following the COVID-19 pandemic tions in several different arenas, including the National Fride Sofie Spjelkavik Larsen wrote her master’s thesis in Ole Smørdal (UiO) has followed the Matvinn project, an ed- In March 2020, Simone Abram at Durham University wrote Transport plan (NTP) conference in December 2019. We Include on Vindmøllebakken in Stavanger – a sustainable ucational programme developed by FIVH and tested among an article in the journal Conversation focussing on how the note that the changes to the ZGG were made in accordance collective housing project. Based on her work, she was junior high schools in Asker municipality. In Matvinn, the coronavirus has led to a sharp reduction in CO2 emissions with the recommendations given by Include’s researchers. invited by Asker municipality to participate in a reference climate calculator Ducky is used, and students develop the and what we can do to keep this reduction after the pan- group on new forms of housing in Asker, with a focus on capacity to act through theory, discussion and practical demic is over. She argues that the COVID-19 crisis feels collective solutions that span generations. Contribution to further developing the ERA cooking. The goal is that they will be able to contribute to more acute than the climate crisis, and the measures that In the spring of 2020, Include researchers were invited reduced food waste by becoming more confident in judging are implemented give an opportunity space for setting by the Ministry of Education and Research to contribute Implementing ‘Kortreist Kvalitet (Local Circuit food items and the climate consequences of food waste. climate initiatives higher on the agenda. DCC (UK) is using inputs to Norway’s response to the EU Commission’s work Quality’) as a foundation for climate strategies This work has uncovered a need to sharpen the focus on the article as a foundation to plan climate initiatives after on the new vision for the ERA. In the Ministry’s response to in Norwegian municipalities critical thinking as a goal in the revision of the Norwegian the COVID-19 pandemic is over. the EU, several of Include’s inputs were put forward; these Kortreist KvalitetKK springs out of an R&D initiative in educational system related to sustainability; it has shown are as follows: the need to pay attention to the distribution KS in which Include’s researchers have been central. KS that external actors need to be more conscious of involving Just transformations are a topic discussed of burdens in the transition to low-emission society; the has established a network consisting of 11 municipalities teachers in the development of these kinds of educational in partner organisations more often need for perspectives from the social sciences to be given programmes, and these programmes must be adapted to and counties, which will put the recommendations from Several of Include’s partners, such as the Environment sufficient attention; and the need for user involvement. The the school’s practices. Include will continue working to the initial work into practice. Hege Westskog and col- Agency and A-lab, highlight that, after joining the centre, RCN has expressed that these inputs will be important in further develop this important educational programme. leagues from CICERO, insam and Civitas, as well as Kjetil they talk more often about just transformations internally relation to goals and prioritisation in the upcoming RCN Bjørklund (KS), have participated in fifty-odd seminars to in their organisations. portfolio on energy, transport and low emissions. share the results and communicate how municipalities can use KK as a foundation for their climate strategies. Inputs to KS’s work on wind power policy Several municipalities and counties are now using the KS expresses that they: framework from KK as the foundation for their strategies ‘have had great use for publications and research carried (e.g. Trøndelag county, ‘How we do it in Trøndelag’, and A-Lab is part of Include to participate in developing out at FNI in the organisation’s academic work on Nor- Overhalla municipality). wegian wind power policy and the concession system, new knowledge that we can’t find today, which we hereunder development of hearing responses to both need to make well-informed choices for our cities.

Julie Sjøwall Oftedal, A-lab Architects, Include Partner

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 60 Research 2020 Research 2020 61 05

Research training and education 2020 – 05 Chapter 5

PhD training, recruitment and projects PhD project: Oskar Vågerö

Research PhD course: The implications of COVID-19 Farm,Roan Wind Fosen, Norway, Photo: by Statkraft for socially inclusive transformations to sustainability In December 2020, Include co-organised a PhD course with the training and Department of Sociology and Human Geography at the University of Oslo. The course focussed on socially inclusive and sustainable responses to COVID-19. Lectures emphasised the social, economic, political and environmental implications of the COVID-19 pandemic, education with particular attention to equitable and inclusive responses to both the pandemic and sustainability challenges in urban areas.

PhD projects and recruitment 2020 During 2020, we recruited five PhD students to start either in 2020 or in 2021.

Ingrid Christensen PhD at TØI Eivind Hjort Matthiasen Title of project (preliminary): Title of project (preliminary): Title of project: Understanding Designing socially inclusive low-carbon energy changes in energy systems may affect different groups The circular economy and the Multi-level governance through consumers’ capacity to transition systems: Social acceptance and energy justice of society and how to design socially just and inclusive role of municipalities. Affiliation: urban growth agreements. to sustainable energy practices: aspects in energy systems modelling energy systems. CICERO A level playing field or a pipe Energy and power system models are useful tools that dream? Affiliation: FNI The intention of this thesis is to explore how social aspects generate insights for low-carbon transition pathways and of energy systems may be included in energy and power for the design of energy policies. The models operate at system models as a way to facilitate the design of socially a high level of techno-economic detail and usually focus just low-carbon energy systems. We will approach the on identifying cost-optimal solutions to problems or sce- topic through a case study on the social acceptance of narios because the techno-economic factors are usually wind power in Norway and with the help of the energy predictable and lend themselves to modelling. However, justice framework. In the first journal article, through a one of the current challenges of energy modelling lies literature review and an interdisciplinary workshop, we in capturing social aspects of energy systems, such as will explore the current inclusion of justice within energy political will, behavioural aspects and public acceptance. and power systems modelling and the applicability of the As such, critics point out that the modelling results may energy justice framework in this academic discipline. The be unreliable and inaccurate as, for example, behavioural second journal article will involve designing a methodology and political drivers of energy demand and policy are and framework for the quantification of spatially varying underrepresented compared with the techno-economic Johannes Volden Oskar Vågerö community acceptance towards wind power in Norway, as details of the models. Although modelling scholars agree Title of project: Towards a sustaina- Title of project: Social acceptance well as related data collection. The third and fourth journal that there are limits to their models, some may argue that ble protein system? Mapping barri- and energy justice in energy articles will then apply the insight from the two previous their use as decision-making tools is more relevant from ers and opportunities for upscaling systems modelling. Affiliation: articles in both a power and an energy system model to an epistemological point of view. Therefore, improving sustainable protein consumption in Department of Technology analyse what impact the inclusion of these aspects would these models to better account for social aspects present Norwegian households. Affiliation: Systems, UiO have on the design of a Norwegian interconnected net zero an opportunity to inform policymakers on how long-term SUM, UiO carbon power and energy system.

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 64 Research training and education 2020 Research training and education 2020 65 05 Chapter 5

Master courses and projects

Word cloud of students' assessments of the Include master's course Word cloud from Include master’s course describing students’ hopes for the future.

Master’s course: SUM4502 INCLUDE – Socially Master’s projects and summer projects inclusive energy transition (5 ETC) Since starting up, Include has tried to recruit master’s students studying relevant fields to write their master’s A core group of 13 Include researchers developed and held Highlight 6 Highlight 7 theses on topics relevant to the centre. In 2020, Include a new master’s course. The course was carried out as a one- awarded master’s stipends to two students writing their week intensive course between 25 and 29 May 2020, and theses on the topics of energy poverty and sustainable it concluded with a three-day home exam. It was open to A new master’s course housing. Two students were also awarded stipends to PhD course on the implications both current master’s students and guest students currently write their theses on the social and environmental im- working in relevant fields who were given the option of in Include of COVID-19 for socially plications of the COVID-19 pandemic; both students will taking the course as a certificate. Senior members of the deliver their theses in 2021. An additional six master’s inclusive sustainability Include research team developed the course content and students were affiliated with Include without stipends, served as lecturers. The course had 27 participants, 19 of transformations and they delivered theses on the topics of sustainability whom were master’s students at the University of Oslo, in education (two students), placemaking in Oslo, food 2 master’s students from international institutions and 6 During spring 2020, 13 Include researchers systems transformation, the Sami indigenous population professionals from relevant fields and PhD students who contributed to our new master’s course, in Norway and wind power development, and municipali- took the course as a certificate. ‘SUM4502 INCLUDE – Socially inclusive energy ties’ role in the sharing economy. In addition, five students The PhD course titled ‘The implications of transition’ (UiO). 27 students participated and were recruited to carry out two summer projects in 2019 COVID-19 for socially inclusive transformations This course addresses a critical question: How can we tran- their course evaluations were overwhelmingly and two in 2020 on the role of justice and equity in energy to sustainability’ (UiO) was organised by Include sition to a climate and environmentally friendly society in positive. The course will be held again in 2021. transition, consumption-based carbon accounting, toll-road researchers and involves international experts a socially inclusive way? Given the urgency of combatting It is open to both current students and others discontent in light of geographies of car dependency and on sustainable urban development and health. climate change, there is a risk that measures to reduce who are interested in participating. incorporating social dimensions into energy modelling. The course is funded by the RCN programme – emissions and avoid environmental degradation will ignore SAMEVAL, and it was held in December 2020. social and distributional aspects. To pre-empt this risk, this course highlights the concepts of energy and environmental justice and social inclusion. This means paying attention to Master’s course evaluation 2020 distributional aspects and questions of who are recognised as stakeholders and become participants in the transfor- mation process. We address energy in various forms and ‘The course has helped me as exploited by various technologies: stationary energy understand how theories (e.g. heating of houses), transport/mobility and embodied 30 % and concepts on socially energy (e.g. as measured through life cycle analysis and inclusive energy transition consumption-based carbon accounting). The course is 70 % can be applied in empirical focussed on socially inclusive solutions, particularly the studies on stationary role municipalities can play in reaching socially inclusive energy transition, mobility, transformations to a climate and environmentally friendly consumption, public plan- society through co-creation of solutions with researchers. ning and innovation’ The aim of the course is to prepare the students for un- derstanding these phenomena from an interdisciplinary, To a high extent social science perspective, as well as to reflect on implica- To some extent tions for policy and practice. Twenty students submitted To a low extent/not at all a course evaluation. Dont know

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 66 Research training and education 2020 Research training and education 2020 67 05 Chapter 5

Summaries of Include master’s and summer projects in 2020

‘Where no one is poor, and energy is abundant’: Shared living from a sustainability perspective. Pro-environment behaviour or capacity to act? Exploring placemaking in Oslo – Critical A study of energy poverty in Norwegian A qualitative case study of Vindmøllebakken A case study of Future in our hands’s (FIVH) perspectives on the ‘making’ of places households By Fride Sofie Spjelkavik Larsen, Master’s Student in work on sustainable development in the ‘Food By Clara Julia Reich, Master’s Student in Development, By Torjus Lunder, Master’s Student in Development, Human Geography, University of Oslo (Stipend Recipient) and Health’ course in junior high schools Environment and Cultural Change, University of Oslo Environment and Cultural Change, University of Oslo By Margret Sævarsdottir & Marit Hovland, Master’s (Stipend Recipient) This thesis studies the Vindmøllebakken sustainable hous- Students in Pedagogy, University of Oslo High urbanisation rates bear potentials for innovations, ing collective in Stavanger, a pilot project following the including adaptation to climate change and transformations Nearly 50 million EU citizens are affected by energy poverty, ‘Gaining by Sharing’ model. The goal is to research whether This master’s thesis studies an educational programme towards sustainability. However, urbanisation also involves generally defined as inadequate use of domestic energy Vindmøllebakken represents a housing model that can developed by the civil society organisation FIVH on sus- risks of increasing social inequalities, gentrification and services. However, while extensive research has been enable more sustainable everyday life by achieving both tainability and food waste. In the revision of the Norwe- displacement and raises questions about how to create conducted on the impacts of energy poverty on households social and environmental benefits. The project focusses on gian educational system sustainable development will liveable and sustainable public spaces. One approach to in the EU, little is known about this in Norway. Norway the residents’ experiences of social life in shared housing become a focus area across all subjects, with an emphasis dealing with this is placemaking, which has emerged as a is one of the most income-equal countries in the world, through aspects such as community, social capital and on developing students’ capacity to act ethically and be movement, concept and tool for improving public spaces as well as a country with historically low electricity pric- social inclusion, as well as whether the housing enables environmentally conscious. In light of this, this project since the 1960s. This project analyses placemaking in Oslo, es. Despite this, if some Norwegian households continue transition to more environmentally friendly practices. studies how sustainability and the capacity to act were drawing on critical perspectives on placemaking and the to live in energy poverty, they may endure the double The study shows that the use of communal areas and highlighted in the Matvinn educational programme, as engaged programme in science and technology studies. trauma of being energy poor while not being recognised cooperation gives benefits in the form of community and well as how teachers use this in their teaching. Further, The analysis shows that people realising placemaking in as such. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore social ties between the residents. Environmentally friendly the project investigates how the different parts of the Mat- Oslo can be categorised into three groups: top-down public how Norwegian households experience, cope with and building solutions, sharing and communal activities enable vinn workshop contribute to promoting capacity within sector actors, bottom-up grassroots actors and placemaking make changes in response to energy poverty. The study sustainable practices. At the same time, aspects of this sustainability and food waste and how the different parts professionals. The collaboration between top-down and finds that a lack of financial independence; social capital model can be difficult to upscale widely in a Norwegian work together as a course design. The study shows that bottom-up actors is particularly challenging due to public in the form of family, social and material dimensions to context. There is a need for more cultural and institutional the workshop gives little space for reflection and criti- regulations, municipal processes, structures and communi- housing and energy consumption; and normative expec- anchoring, public support schemes, and innovation in cal thinking, which are key to developing the capacity cation issues. To evaluate whether placemaking is de facto tations of energy use have implications for how energy an established building sector for this to become a more to act. A greater focus on dialogue and critical reflection improving public places, potential negative environmental poverty is experienced by households. A group of younger widespread and accessible housing model in the future. could enable teachers to integrate the programme into and social outcomes of placemaking need to be assessed interviewees feel marginalised, having to limit energy use their educational practices more effectively. The project further, for example, how power structures, dynamics and extensively, cut food costs, rely on financial support from recommends an improved course design that focusses place narratives are at play in the case studies. parents and isolate themselves to pay high energy bills in on teachers’ ownership of the programme, draws on the the colder months. They feel unable to live ‘normal’ lives digital climate calculator Ducky and includes the school and struggle with feelings of shame, embarrassment and and school owner as active participants. stigma. A group of older interviewees are less vulnerable because they have more stable sources of income, draw on cheap or free firewood and have stronger social capital in the form of their children.

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 68 Research training and education 2020 Research training and education 2020 69 05 Chapter 5

Summaries of Include master’s and summer projects in 2020

The role of municipalities in non-profit sharing Energy modelling and social factors schemes: A study of how municipalities can Summer Project by Sigurd Arntzen, Associated with contribute to the establishment, operation and Department for Technology Systems, UiO expansion of non-profit sharing schemes By Malin Whittaker, Master’s Student in Environment Energy system models are often used to map out the and Society Studies, Radboud University transition to zero carbon energy systems, but they usually lack a representation of social factors that may shape The sharing economy is emerging all over the world and and affect the real energy transition. In this study, ways is showing promising signs of contributing to sustainable of incorporating social factors in energy system models consumption and production. The aim of this thesis was are suggested, making the model solutions efficient and to analyse how municipalities can contribute to the estab- socially inclusive. This is done by looking at the imple- lishment, long-term operation and expansion of non-profit mentation of wind power in Norway, which has proven sharing schemes. This was done through a multiple-case to be controversial. By considering the development of study of the two Swedish municipalities, Gothenburg and wind power plants and their social acceptance, the study Cream of the crop? A study of consumers in Finnskogen up in the air? A comparison of Karlstad. The results show that while municipalities engage identifies some common assumptions about wind power opposition. These assumptions are underlying in the the alternative food network REKO in Oslo and energy justice and the role of Skogfinnene in in different kinds of measures when governing non-profit sharing schemes, the provision of premises and financial energy system models, and therefore, they will bias the sustainable transitions in the Norwegian food wind power development on the Norwegian solutions presented by the models. As a consequence, system and Swedish side of Finnskogen support were found to be highly likely to contribute to the material, human and financial resources needed by the the study suggests that energy system models should By Nora May Engeseth, Master’s Student in Development, By Nora Maria Rognstad, Master’s Student in City and non-profit sharing schemes. Finally, it was found that the be made more sensitive to local communities by either Environment and Cultural Change, University of Oslo Regional Planning, Norwegian University of Life Sciences political orientation in the municipality, motivations of civil mapping out social interest in a more extensive way or servants, laws and societal trends function as enabling or by allowing for a segmented discount rate. Locked in a global system of unsustainable production, This thesis compares two specific wind power projects in impeding factors for the municipalities’ work. processing, distribution and disposal, the current food Finnskogen, a landscape area along both sides of the Nor- consumption practices of Norwegians contribute to environ- wegian/Swedish border, between Innlandet in Norway and mental degradation, climate change and social injustices. In Värmland in Sweden. The area is named after the ‘Skogfin- response to these issues, a growing number of alternative ner’, who are recognised as a national minority group in food networks seek to transform unsustainable processes both Norway and Sweden. Preserving Finnskogen’s nature of food provisioning, simultaneously negotiating what is important for re-telling the Skogfinner’s cultural herit- good food is and should be. However, these initiatives age. In contrast, the area’s wind and waterfalls carry great raise questions about the potential of niche food systems potential for renewable energy. The thesis is a comparative to bring about change. This thesis analyses the sustaina- study of the Norwegian and Swedish licensing processes bility transition challenges of the Norwegian food system for wind power in this area, in light of energy justice. The by examining the engagement of consumers in two REKO project asked how Skogfinner are recognised, involved and (network for Rettferdig Konsum- just consumption) rings in compensated in relation to wind turbine installations on Oslo. REKO is a network that uses an online platform to the Norwegian and Swedish sides of Finnskogen, and what facilitate local and direct trade between consumers and factors may explain the different outcomes. The research producers. The analysis showed that REKO consumption finds a lower degree of recognition of Skogfinner in Norway Toll-road resistance in the cities: An analysis of structures in these cities to understand resistance against is a niche activity within routinised everyday life food con- than Sweden and draws possible factors that may have toll-road discontent seen in relation to toll-road road tolls. The study shows that many who are discontent sumption. The momentum of niches and landscape-level influenced and contributed to inequalities between the structures in Oslo, Bergen, Nord-Jæren and with the toll system feel that road tolls have asymmetri- pressures needs to intersect with changes in food practices Norwegian and Swedish licensing processes. Trondheim cal and unjust impacts, public transport is not a feasible for there to be a chance of reconfiguring the unsustainable alternative for many people and the funding from road Summer Project by Tora Voll Dombu, Brage Vagli Østbye tolls goes to measures from which they do not benefit. The food provisioning regimes of the Norwegian and global and Morten Letnes, Associated with TØI and UiO food systems. Moreover, there is an opportunity to reframe study concludes that a ‘creeping’ change in the rhetoric and and make the REKO network easier to use. Doing so may aims of the toll system can weaken the system’s legitimacy The goal of this project was to describe the background, reconfigure unsustainable consumption practices at the and the perceived value of the tolls; the timing, content history and structure of the toll-road system in the four level of niche innovations, if not of the food system. and extent of the changes introduced to the system have largest Norwegian city regions (Oslo, Bergen, Stavan- an impact on how resistance is mobilised; and the spatial ger/Nord-Jæren and Trondheim), as well as the level of orientation of the system is important for understanding discontent with the toll-road system in these areas. The resistance to tolls, with Nord-Jæren in particular having a project studies the relationship between the different toll different orientation than the other city regions do.

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 70 Research training and education 2020 Research training and education 2020 71 06

International cooperation – Nasa on Unsplash

06 Chapter 6

Members of the Include Advisory Board

Alan Warde Janet Stephenson Roger Keil Institute of Sociology, School Centre for Sustainability, Faculty of Environmental of Social Sciences, University University of Otago, Studies, York University, of Manchester, UK New Zealand. Toronto, Canada International cooperation

Include benefits from collaborating with four senior researchers associated with Include-partner Durham University, UK, and one scholar from Edinburgh University. One of the really valuable parts of Include The leader of the Durham team, Simone Abram, forms Desmond McNeill Mariëtte de Haan Michèle Knodt part of Include’s management group and regularly keeps is that it has an international dimension, Centre for Development and Faculty of Social and Behavioural Institute for Political Science, in touch with the researchers in Oslo. The other members the Environment, University Sciences, Utrecht University, TU Darmstadt, Germany and we’re really glad at Durham to be part from Durham each have their field of expertise that they of Oslo, Norway the Netherlands of this project. It is interesting to compare brought into the main group from time to time, for exam- Durham with Norway. So we think we can ple, during an internal Christmas event for researchers. have some interesting things to say and Kirsten Jenkins, an internationally leading scholar on energy justice, collaborated with Include researcher Kacper compare with Norway and think about Szulecki (UiO) to examine how energy justice and energy which factors really make a difference democracy can mutually nurture each other as concepts. – what’s the impact of austerity, what’s Include’s Advisory Board has nine distinguished interna- tional scholars with backgrounds that make them highly the impact of different political directions, suited for dialogue and collaboration with researchers, how can decarbonisation work across practitioners, PhD fellows and students in Include. Roger those differences, and what can we Keil collaborated with Per Gunnar Røe’s (UiO) group in learn from each other? a research project, Lars Coenen contributed with a lecture in our master’s course SUM4502 Include and Katarina Eckerberg and Desmond McNeill participated in a work- Simone Abram, Durham University, Include WP Leader shop to discuss and develop plans for communication. Lars Coenen Simin Davoudi Katarina Eckerberg Mohn Centre for Innovation and School of Architecture, Planning Department of Political Science, Regional Development, Western & Landscape, University of Umeå University, Sweden Norway University of Applied Newcastle, UK Sciences, Norway

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 74 International cooperation International cooperation 75 06 Chapter 6

Application title Applicant/ Funding agency/ National and international research collaboration In publications Research applications with internationa project leader programme Include researchers also collaborate with inter- partners Inclusive Transition TØI (NO) JPI Urban Europe Utrecht University (NL), Oxford University national researchers and Norwegian researchers towards Electric Mobility (UK), Adam Mikiewicz University (PL), In 2020, the Include team participated in or led a outside the Include consortium in their publica- (ITEM) Hexagon (PL) substantial number of applications (18), all involving tions. Five non-Include Norwegian institutions and international research partners2. The table below three European institutions are represented in our gives an overview of the initiatives and collaborat- Local Governance for Green Aalborg Danmarks Frie CICERO (NO), Åbo Akademi (FI), Göteborg publication list. ing partners. In total, these applications involved Transitions in the Nordic University forskningsfond University (SE) collaboration with 23 Nordic, 56 European and (Nordic GTs) (DK) Presentations to international audiences 3 non-European institutions outside the Include Oil and gas transition – Climate Strat- Danish KR University of Edinburgh (UK), Aalborg In 2019 and 2020, Include researchers gave 20 pres- consortium. Building evidence for policy egies (EU) and Foundation University (DK), University of Oslo (NO) entations at international conferences, one of which action in the United King- Stockholm was a keynote presentation given by Gavin Bridge dom, Norway and Denmark Env. Inst. (SE) (Durham University), What works 2019: Bridging research and policy on sustainable development Smart sol i Norden Solenergi­ Interreg Tretorget (NO), NTNU Gjøvik (NO), INN Uni- in Oslo, Norway. klyngen Sweden-Norway versity (NO), UiO, Multiconsult (NO), Akershus (EU) Energy (NO), the Regional Council for Sør-­ Østerdal (NO), Dalarna University (SE), Glava Energy Center (SE), Karlstad University (SE) Table II. Research applications with international partners Mobility, Health and TØI (NO) RCN UiO (NO), NMBU (NO), Karlstad University (SE), Inclusive Urban Epidemic LISER (LU) Application title Applicant/ Funding agency/ National and international research collaboration Resilience (MOBI-HEALTH) project leader programme Conditions for Democrat- SAI/UiO (NO) RCN UiO (NO), CICERO (NO), Univ. of Wroclaw (PL) COVID-19 outbreak TØI (NO) Horizon 2020 NMBU (NO), University of Natural Resources ic Resilience and Climate and the (behavioural) and Life Sciences Vienna (AT), University of Action (CoDemoRe) social-health-economic Malta (MT), UAV (IT), KTH (SE), Karlstad impacts (EPITRANS) University (SE), TU Delft (NL), TU Dortmund Land-use change and FNI (NO) RCN Univ. of Uppsala (SE), NMBU (NO) (GE), LISER (LU), Hexagon, (PL), University of changing wind power gov- Madrid (ES), University of Copenhagen (DK), ernance: Process, practices and POLIS (European Network) and pressure (WINDGOV)

Scaling up inclusive citizen Eindhoven Horizon 2020 Durham University (UK), UiO (NO), Stichting The windy path towards SUM/UiO (NO) RCN Univ. of Iceland (IS), Univ. of Copenhagen (DK) engagement for a fair Technical Uni- platform (NL) European Univ. Institute (IT), low-emission societies: energy transition towards versity (NL) Sapenzia University of Rome (IT), DIW Berlin Exploring the effects of decarbonisation of the (DE), South-East Europe Change Net Foundation wind farms on rural energy system (ENGAGE) (BA), University of Edinburgh (UK) societies in Nordic countries (NORWIND) League Against Energy SEVEN, The Horizon 2020 FNI (NO), Association of Czech and Moravian Poverty (LEAP) Energy Effi- Housing Cooperatives (CZ), Slovak Institute of Urban dreams: How SN (NO) NFR TØI (NO), OsloMet (NO), UiO (NO) ciency Center Education (SK), ZSPS (SK), Slovak Innovation neighbourhoods change, Z.U. (CZ) and Energy Agency (SK), Viaeuropa competence and how they shape their centre SRO (SK), Euromasc AS (NO), Center of inhabitants? Education in Kongsvinger (NO), ÉMI Non-Profit Llc. (HU), Várpalota Municipality (HU), National Municipalities in the OsloMet/NIBR RCN Lund University (SE) Social Housing Association Foundation (AM), European Multilevel Union (NO) Czech Technical University in Prague (CZ) Administration: Towards multi-hatted local 2. In addition, Include researchers at TØI and SUM and involving two other departments at UiO (Dept. of Informatics, Dept. of Technical Systems) governments? applied successfully for seed money at UiO:Energy, Project: SIEM – Socially Inclusive E-Mobility.

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 76 International cooperation International cooperation 77 06 Chapter 6

Application title Applicant/ Funding agency/ National and international research collaboration project leader programme

Innovative planning NIBIO (NO) RCN SUM/UiO (NO), CICERO (NO), insam (NO), processes to identify Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, sustainable land use and Fisheries and Food /ILVO (BE), Swiss Federal management solutions that Research Institute/WSL (CH), University of respect climate and nature Santiago de Compostela/USC (ES) (CLIMBIN)

Socially Inclusive UiO (NO) UiO:Energy Collaboration between Department of E-mobility (SIEM) Informatics UiO, Include and TØI

Everyday COVID-19 Wageningen RCN University of Geneva (CH), University of Univ. (NL) Lancaster (UK), University of Manchester (UK), Saint Mary’s College (US), TU Berlin (DE), LMU Munich (DE), University of Oslo (NO), Beijing Institute of Technology (CN), Renmin University of China (CN), Sciences Po Paris (FR), Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca (IT), NUI Galway (IE)

Starting conditions, poten- Freie Universi- Horizon 2020 ACER (ES), Becker, Büttner & Held (DE), CICERO tials, barriers and drivers tät Berlin (DE) (NO), Ecoazioni (IT), ECORYS españa (ES), TU of RES-based community Eindhoven (NL), ENEA (IT), VITO (BE), ICLEI energy (COME RES) European Secretariat (DE), Institute of Physical Energetics (LV), INEGI (PT), LEIF (LV), NVE (NO), KAPE (PL), REScoop.eu (BE)

A methodology for integrat- UiO (NO) Horizon 2020 University of Natural Resources and Life ing community acceptance Sciences Vienna (AT) of wind energy into energy system modelling (WINDACCEPT)

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 78 International cooperation International cooperation 79 07

Include communication 2020 – 07 Chapter 7

Include Established new communication channels communication 2020

The aim of Include is to produce knowledge publications, 46 media contributions, 119 presentations and on how to achieve a just transition to a 5 inputs to policy and planning processes contributed by the Include team in 2019 and 2020, Include co-hosted 5 low-emission society. For that knowledge seminars and workshops for external audiences in 2020 to be used, we have to succeed in our re- on digital platforms. search communication within the project, to our many partners and to a wider As a newly established centre, we have also sought collab- The Include webpage was launched in 2019 and had had more than 25 500 page oration with our research partners, in particular, for help audience. disseminating information to external parties. In addition views by 31 December 2020. to developing our channels, we will continue to collaborate In the communication strategy Include developed and with partner institutions on content sharing in the future. adopted in the autumn of 2020, we identify the three important target groups for Include:

1. The scientific community 2. Stakeholders, including the following: 1) partners and Highlight 8 2) decision makers and organisations beyond Include’s partners 3. The wider audience (the public) Partner-led podcast

Much of Include’s focus during 2019 and 2020 was on setting up our channels for internal communication and conducting internal meetings to establish Include’s project The Environment Agency launched the podcast portfolio. We have established Teams channels for internal Climate Podcast 24: Healthy economy, just climate communication and document archives, a newsletter and initiatives, inspired by their participation in Include. a project overview in AirTable. We have also established necessary communication tools, such as logos, graphics, websites, Teams groups, newsletters and social media chan- nels. In addition, throughout 2020, we organised several meetings with the project team in different constellations. Facebook: 346 followers (with posts reaching Continuous communication and sharing of information between 85 and 2600 people during 2020) between the researchers and user partners is an important cornerstone of Include’s work, and we have aimed to set up channels for internal communication that enable this. The newsletter was created in June 2020 For us, like many others, the coronavirus epidemic has affected the possibility of arranging physical events, and and sent out twice to approx. 400 recipients unfortunately, the Include kick-off event planned on 30 during 2020. to 31 March was cancelled due to government restrictions. Matt Botsford on Unsplash However, in addition to the communication activities high- Twitter: 135 followers (tweets reaching over lighted throughout this annual report, and the 19 academic 15 900 impressions during 2020)

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 82 Include communication 2020 Include communication 2020 83 07 Chapter 7

Annual meeting 2020 Communication workshop 2020

All in all, how would you To what extent do you 14 % rate the meeting? 20 % think the seminar was useful in terms of Include’s work with communication? 86 % 80 %

Very good To a high extent Good To some extent Neutral Neutral Bad To a low extent Very bad

Table III. Overview of internal events 2019 and In addition to bilateral meetings with partners, project Photo from Include’s warm-up workshop, 28.11.2019 meetings, management group meetings and meetings of 2020, excluding WP and project meetings. the researchers and partners attached to each WP, Include held the meetings listed below for all researchers and/or Events partners in 2019 and 2020.

Internal events Internal event Date Participants Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, most of the meetings in 2020 were held digitally, and the Include team put signif- Warming up 28 November 2019 Researchers and partners icant preparation and effort into ensuring that these digital meetings ran smoothly, receiving highly positive feedback One of the best digital meetings Annual meeting 30 March 2020 Partners and research Institutes/ from participants on our ability to carry out well-organ- I have participated in :) Well done! universities ised online meetings. Through this, our secretariat team has gained skills in organising digital meetings, which Constituent board meeting 30 March 2020 Board will be useful in the future as well. Include’s researchers An unusually good Zoom-seminar! and user partners are spread throughout Norway and Interesting presentations, pleasant Researcher meeting 4 May 2020 Researchers internationally, and we have found that digital meetings atmosphere and great entertainment! can be a useful tool for ensuring that a larger number of Partner meeting on projects 19 May 2020 Researchers and partners people have a chance to participate and receive updates and case studies on Include’s work, while avoiding non-essential air travel. Impressively well-executed technically! Well-prepared with groups and the form. Board meeting 9 June 2020 Board We invited young music scholars to perform and a pro- Efficient. fessional person to make live drawings of what was said during events to allow participants to make use of more Communication workshop 8 October 2020 Researchers and partners Anonymous feedback on the Include Communication senses than cognitive ones. This was also a way to support Workshop, 08.10.2020 a few individuals in a challenging time. Board meeting 8 October 2020 Board

Christmas gathering 17 December 2020 Researchers

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 84 Include communication 2020 Include communication 2020 85 07 Chapter 7

External events In addition to the communication activities highlighted Highlight 12 throughout this annual report, and the 19 academic pub- Highlight 9 Highlight 10 lications, 46 media contributions, 119 presentations and 5 inputs to policy and planning processes contributed by the Include team in 2019 and 2020, Include co-hosted 5 Partner-led event Include in the media Include in the media seminars and workshops for external audiences in 2020. Per Gunnar Røe was interviewed by NRK’s Daily Lars H. Gulbrandsen, FNI, participated in the TV The Include kick-off event planned on 30 to 31 March was Review on how city planning can be affected programme The Debate on NRK. Research on wind cancelled because of restrictions on gatherings during the power at FNI provided a foundation for the political Julie Sjøwall Oftedal of A-lab architects was the by COVID-19, and why it is important to under- COVID-19 pandemic. The plan was for the first day of this processes that followed, culminating in a recom- initiator of and moderator for the session ‘Public stand sociocultural factors when planning urban event to be an externally oriented kick-off session with mendation that new applications for concessions space in the inclusive city’ during the Oslo Urban development. presentations on Include’s research focus. The second day should be processed using the Planning and Build- Arena conference ‘Co-creating the City’ on the was planned to be an internal workshop for the research- ing Act. This will give more power to local authori- 11th of September, where several Include part- ers and user partners to get to know each other and begin ties in questions of wind power development. planning the Centre’s activities, as well as electing Include’s ners and researchers contributed. Board in a General Assembly. The General Assembly was held as a digital meeting, and the in-person kick-off sem- inar was initially delayed to October, then cancelled and replaced with a digital seminar for developing Include’s communication strategy when it became clear that COVID restrictions would continue at this time. Highlight 11

Include in the media

Include researchers wrote an opinion piece in Table IV. Overview of External events organised by Include 2019 and 2020 the Technical Weekly Magazine titled ‘Who can even out their energy use?’ National energy authorities are planning changes in electricity External event Date Participants tariffs. Include researchers argued that it is important to understand the consequences for UiO Energy Forum (co-organised by 27–28 November 2019 Researchers and stakeholders, households before implementing new tariffs to Include and UiO:Energy) open to the public avoid contributing to increased social inequality. Polytechnic Society seminar on the role of 29 December 2019 Researchers, stakeholders and municipalities in the green shift (co-organised the public by Include and Polytechnic Society)

Breakfast seminar on inclusive energy transitions 29 January 2020 Researchers and stakeholders, (jointly organised by Include and CIENS) open to the public

Breakfast seminar: The knowledge politics of 5 March 2020 Researchers and stakeholders, urban sustainable energy experiments (jointly open to the public organised by Include and the Cities and Societies seminar series)

Kick-off Include. Cancelled 30–31 March Researchers, stakeholders and the public

Seminar during Oslo Urban Arena: Public spaces 11 September 2020 Researchers and stakeholders, in the inclusive city: How can we combine a open to the public sustainable environmental development of cities with a socially just and inclusive development? (joint Include and A-lab seminar)

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 86 Include communication 2020 Include communication 2020 87 08

Appendices – 08 Chapter 8

APPENDIX A Projects defined in 2020

Projects defined and described during 2020 (started in either 2020 or in 2021). Master’s projects are excluded. Hence, not all projects defined in our project catalogue are included in the tables below. Energy systems in transition (WP1)

Project Overall objective Project leader and partners

Clean energy package (CEP) To map Norwegian policymakers’ and Kacper Szulecki, ISV (UiO), FNI stakeholders’ perspectives on the CEP Solenergiklyngen and its implementation and identify Energy systems in transition (WP1) the impact of CEP on Norway’s renew- able energy and community energy Project Overall objective Project leader and partners sector

Gendered energy transition To contribute knowledge on gendered Karina Standal, CICERO, Bio-energy potential To identify prospects for firewood and Asbjørn Torvanger, CICERO, FNI, aspects of the low-carbon energy University of Twente advanced biofuel production and use, Viken, Tretorget transition merits in social systems and efficient policies and measures to realise these Flexible electricity use: Enabling To understand how different house- Hanne Sæle, SINTEF Energy opportunities and constraining factors hold groups use and interpret available Research, CICERO, Viken, NVE, information about time-of-use pricing Istad Nett, Forbrukerrådet, Winds of change To explain why municipal councils Per Ove Eikeland, FNI, Viken, KS, and consumption levels and their atti- Energi Norge who earlier had voted for wind power tudes towards capacity pricing development have changed position

Flexible electricity use: Lessons To explore how different instruments Karina Standal, CICERO, SUM Collective and tenant prosumers To investigate the regulatory challeng- Marie Byskov Lindberg, FNI, from pilot projects aimed at improving electricity demand (UiO), Otago University, Viken, es associated with involving ‘collective Solenergiklyngen, Energi Norge flexibility affect different household NVE, Istad Nett, Forbrukerrådet, residents’ in the prosumer segment groups’ scheduling of electricity use, Energi Norge energy practices, and motivations for Designing socially inclusive low- To explore and improve the rep- Oskar Vågerö, Department of energy saving carbon energy systems: Social ac- resentation of social factors in energy Technology Systems (UiO), ceptance and energy justice aspects systems modelling as an attempt to FNI, NVE The municipality as energy pioneer To explain why a municipality has Tor Håkon Jackson Inderberg, in energy systems modelling move the scientific field of energy sys- become an energy pioneer, identify FNI, CICERO, SUM (UiO), tems modelling beyond the dominating barriers in this process and clarify how Kongsberg Kommunale Eiendom techno-economic view the barriers have been managed Understanding consumers’ capacity To research the capacity of practition- Eivind Hjort Matthisen, FNI Flexible energy use in Norway To explore how national regulations Tor Håkon Jackson Inderberg, to transition to sustainable energy ers to transition to energy-relevant and Sweden: A comparison for electricity demand flexibility (EDF) FNI, Lund University, NVE, practices: A level playing field or practices, but also accentuate the need have developed in Norway and Sweden Viken, Istad Nett, Forbrukerrådet a pipe dream? to include dimensions of inequality and explain the political feasibility of more purposefully when studying adopting different instruments for EDF energy practices

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 90 Appendices Appendices 91 08 Chapter 8

Energy spaces and flows (WP2) Energy spaces and flows (WP2)

Project Overall objective Project leader and partners Project Overall objective Project leader and partners

Urban sprawl To enhance public authorities’ abilities Aud Tennøy, TØI, Lillestrøm, A-lab, Towards a sustainable protein To map barriers and opportunities Johannes Volden, SUM (UiO) to steer land use development in climate Helsedirektoratet, Ullensaker, system? for upscaling sustainable protein friendly directions at the same time Viken consumption in Norwegian households of being socially just Inclusive and sustainable planning To explore ongoing planning practices Asker, ISS (UiO), IPed (UiO), Everyday COVID-19 To produce new insights into how Arve Hansen, SUM, Wageningen in Vestre Billingstad as part of the development project SUM(UiO) ruptures in socio-material systems can University, Helsedirektoratet ‘Vestre Billingstad’, focussing on work to fundamentally alter or reinforce sustainable and socially inclusive routing consumption practices – strategies and projects and for whom

Epidemic vulnerability and To assess the short-, mid- and long-term Lars Böcker, TØI, ISS (UiO), urban land use implications for urban land use and Durham University, A-lab, Aspelin transport in the face of the 2020 Ramm, Viken COVID-19 pandemic

Mass landfills: A pilot study Map the movement of masses from Bjørnar Sæther, ISS (UiO), Municipalities as change agents (WP3) construction sites to mass landfills Hurdal, Trefokus and raise questions concerning social Project Overall objective Project leader and partners inclusiveness both at the urban sites of construction and at the rural mass Urban growth agreements (UGAs) To investigate to what extent and how Anders Tønnesen, CICERO, landfills issues of social inequalities were part OsloMet, SUM (UiO), Viken of the UGA renegotiation process and Smart and energy positive To investigate the conceptualisation Per Gunnar Røe, ISS (UiO) to what extent and how the renego- satellite cities and promotion of energy smart new tiated UGAs reflect social inequality towns dimensions

Truly public spaces To study existing urban public and Per Gunnar Røe, ISS (UiO), Re-making consumption To explore how municipality-led Ulrikke Wethal, SUM (UiO), Oslo, semi-public spaces focussing on how Bærum, Lillestrøm, A-lab, Oslo, sustainability initiatives are under- Asker these spaces frame social practices, Viken, Trefokus stood and used by inhabitants seeking are socially inclusive and contribute to to understand potential social, eco- place identity; to explore the potential nomic or institutional barriers to the for developing socially inclusive public upscaling of collaborative consumption spaces Greening industrial relations in To explore the potential for ‘greening’ David Jordhus-Lier, ISS (UiO), KS, Sustainable housing developments To establish criteria for development of Rolf Jacobsen, Gaia arkitekter, Norwegian municipalities industrial relations in the municipal Utdanningsforbundet implementation models for sustainable Hurdal, A-lab, Viken, Trefokus sector housing projects and attractive local communities Climate budgeting To investigate the role of climate Mette Talseth, Solnørdal budgeting with respect to sustainability UiT, SUM (UiO), Civitas, Oslo, Electric vehicles and solar To explore the spatial distribution of Lars Böcker, TØI, FNI transformation in municipalities Tromsø, Miljødirektoratet, Troms prosumption electric vehicle (EV) ownership and PV og Finnmark, KS, Solenergik- prosumption, their interconnections lyngen, A-lab, Viken, Lillestrøm, and their correlations with socio- Bærum economic status and other population statistics Local circuits To explore the potential for local Hege Westskog, circuits with respect to sustainability SUM (UiO), CICERO, UiT, insam, transformations in local communities KS, Tromsø, Hurdal, Oslo, Arendal, Lillestrøm, Spire, A-lab

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 92 Appendices Appendices 93 08 Chapter 8

Municipalities as change agents (WP3) Interventions (WP4) and Learning across borders (WP5)

Project Overall objective Project leader and partners Project Overall objective Project leader and partners

Peripheric public participation To contribute new knowledge about Sigrid Stokstad, Hovinbyen: Pre-study (WP4) To explore and map the conditions for Ole Smørdal, IPed (UiO), ISS the urban-rural tensions within OsloMet, SUM (UiO), Ullensaker, developing Hovinbyen as a socially (UiO), Aspelin Ramm, Spire, municipalities in initialisation and Hurdal, Lillestrøm, Asker, A-lab sustainable urban district A-lab, Solenergiklyngen, Viken, implementation of decarbonisation Trefokus, Pådriv, OBOS Bostart measures in municipalities Youth climate leadership pilots To address sustainable development of Asker, IPed (UiO) Smaller municipalities To understand what characterises Anders Tønnesen, (WP4) places in Asker through youth climate national-authority ambitions for CICERO, SUM (UiO), Troms leadership climate-friendly land use in smaller og Finnmark Fylkeskommune, municipalities and how these munici­ Viken Durham climate action plan (WP5) To explore how DCC’s Climate Action Chima Michael, Anyadike-Danes palities experience these ambitions; Plan does/should address social Durham University, Durham to explore how smaller municipalities inclusion County Council work to address climate-friendly land use and how this may affect social justice Coronavirus strategies (WP5) To understand how local government Claire Dungey, Durham organisations are combining climate University, Durham Council Education To provide an overview of the urgency Jennifer Joy West, CICERO action and COVID-recovery plans and of the climate change challenge, the if/how social inclusion issues are issues at stake and some key barriers included in their response that need to be overcome in theo- ry, policy and practice to progress a transformative learning agenda that supports inclusive, democratic and effective societal transformations in the face of climate change

Circular economy To understand the role of munici- Ingrid Christiansen, CICERO palities in contributing to inclusive solutions for the circular economy (preliminary)

Multi-level governance To explore the multi-level governance PhD, TØI processes of transport policy (preliminary)

Network for local circuits To contribute to a transformative Kjetil Bjørklund, KS, insam, climate agenda in Norwegian Civitas, CICERO, SUM (UiO) municipalities

Developing competence for To develop a model for competence Asker, Insam, SUM (UiO), IPed transformative action building on sustainability transforma- (UiO), USN, Miljødirektoratet tions within municipalities (Klimasats)

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 94 Appendices Appendices 95 08 Chapter 8

APPENDIX B Personnel

Key Researchers Key Researchers

Name Position Institution Gender Research area Name Position Institution Gender Research area

Hege Westskog Researcher, FME Coordinator SUM, UiO F WP3 Helene Amundsen Senior Researcher CICERO F WP3

Tanja Winther Professor, Head of Include SUM, UiO F WP1 Jennifer Joy West Senior Researcher CICERO F WP3

Arve Hansen Researcher SUM, UiO M WP2 Marianne Aasen Senior Researcher CICERO F WP1

Kacper Szulecki Researcher ISV, UiO M WP1 Anders Tønnessen Senior Researcher CICERO M WP3

Per Gunnar Røe Professor ISS, UiO M WP2 Karina Standal Senior Researcher CICERO F WP1

Bjørnar Sæther Professor ISS, UiO M WP2, WP3 Asbjørn Torvanger Senior Researcher CICERO M WP1

David Jordhus-Lier Professor ISS, UiO M WP2, WP3 Aud Tennøy Chief Researcher TØI F WP2

Ole Smørdal Researcher IPED, UiO M WP4 Petter Christiansen Senior Research Officer TØI M WP3

Marianne Zeyringer Associate Professor ITS, UiO F WP1 Fitwi Wolday Research Planner TØI M WP2, WP3

Lene Foss Professor UiT F WP3 Lars Böcker Senior Research Geographer TØI M WP2

Mette Solnørdal Researcher UiT F WP3 Sigrid Stokstad Researcher NIBR, OsloMet F WP3

Elin Anita Nilsen Associate Professor UiT F WP3 Lars Wang Advisor, CEO insam M WP3

Tor Håkon Jackson Inderberg Senior Research Fellow FNI M WP1 Bård Sødal Grasbekk Advisor insam M WP3

Jørgen Wettestad Research Professor FNI M WP1 Reidunn Mygland Advisor insam F WP3

Lars H. Gulbrandsen Deputy Director, FNI M WP1 Rolf Jacobsen Consultant Gaia Arkitekter M WP2 Research Director Eivind Selvig Consultant Civitas M WP2 Ole Kristian Fauchald Research Professor FNI M WP1 Simone Abram Professor Durham University F WP5 Jon Birger Skjærseth Research Professor FNI M WP1 Andres Luque Ayala Associate Professor Durham University M WP5 Marie Byskov Lindberg Senior Research Fellow FNI F WP1 Gavin Bridge Professor Durham University M WP5 Per Ove Eikeland Senior Research Fellow FNI M WP1 Chima Michael Anyad- Researcher Durham University M WP5 Karoline Hægstad Flåm Researcher FNI F WP1 ike-Danes

Mari Lie Larsen Research Fellow FNI F WP1 Claire Dungey Researcher Durham University F WP5

Torbjørg Jevnaker Research Fellow FNI F WP1 Kirsten Jenkins Lecturer Edinburgh F WP5 University

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 96 Appendices Appendices 97 08 Chapter 8

Postdoctoral researchers with financial support from the Centre budget Administrative and finance staff

Name Nationality Period Gender Topic Name Affiliation Gender Topic

Ulrikke Bryn Wethal Norwegian 2019-24 F WP2, WP3 Marius Bergh SUM, UiO M WP7

Terje Røysum SUM, UiO M WP7 PhD students with financial support from the Centre budget Kristoffer Ring SUM, UiO M WP7 Name Nationality Period Gender Topic Knut Kjæreng SUM, UiO M WP7 Oskar Vågerö Swedish 2020-24 M WP1 Lars Fredrik Janby ISS, UiO M WP7

Communication and research support staff Galina Loginova ISS, UiO F WP7

Trine Labahå IPED, UiO F WP7 Name Affiliation Gender Topic Kari-Anne Ulfsnes IPED, UiO F WP7 Hilde Holsten SUM, UiO F WP6 Ilze Gehe ISV, UiO F WP7 Kjersti Litleskare SUM, UiO F WP6 Mia Marie Kinden Jensen UiO F WP7 Iris Leikanger SUM, UiO F WP7, WP3 Kathrine Olsgard UiO F WP7 Øyvind Sundet SUM, UiO M WP7, WP2 Katinka Grønli UiO F WP7 Johannes Volden SUM, UiO M WP2 Elise Prytz Hafskjold CICERO F WP7 Sindre Hoff SUM, UiO M WP2 Suzanne Tærud Day CICERO F WP7 Marit Hovland IPED, UiO F WP4 Sigrid Rian Song CICERO F WP7 Margret Sævarsdottir IPED, UiO F WP4 Claes Lykke Ragner FNI M WP7 Neha Singh IPED, UiO F WP4 Mariann Opaker OsloMet F WP7 Richard Nesaas IPED, UiO M WP4 Gøril Heimland UiT F WP7 Milla Bjerkestrand ISS, UiO F WP2 Christian Hansen UiT M WP7 Ingrid Andrea Holland ISS, UiO F WP3 Lisbeth Kjelstrup TØI F WP7 Astrid Arnslett CICERO F WP6 Espen Refstie TØI M WP7 Erik Tollefsen CICERO M WP6

Bente Bakken UiO: Energi F WP6

Anna Valberg FNI F WP6

Erik Berge ISS, UiO M WP6

Jan-Tore Berghei OsloMet M WP6

Hanne-Sparre Enger TØI F WP6

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 98 Appendices Appendices 99 08 Chapter 8

Include board members and substitute board members Include international advisory board members

Name Affiliation Gender Role Name Affiliation Gender

Vebjørn Bakken UiO M Board member Alan Warde Manchester University, UK M

Marianne E. Lien UiO F Substitute Janet Stephenson University of Otago, NZ F

Kristin Halvorsen CICERO F Board member Roger Keil York University, CA M

Desmond McNeill University of Oslo, NO M Frode Longva CICERO M Substitute

Mariëtte de Haan Utrecht University, NL F Iver Neumann FNI M Board member

Michèle Knodt TU Darmstadt, DE F Lars Gulbrandsen FNI M Substitute

Lars Coenen HvL, NO M Matteo Chiesa UiT M Board member

Simin Davoudi Newcastle University, UK F Edel O. Elvevoll UiT F Substitute

Katarina Eckerberg Umeå University, SE F Bjørn Erik Nordby Asker kommune M Board member

Erling Guderud Asker kommune M Substitute

Henriette Rognlien Hurdal kommune F Board member Summer projects

Julie Sjøwall Oftedal A-lab F Board member Name Affiliation Gender Topic

Magnus Berg Jørgensen A-lab M Substitute Tora Voll Domby (2020) TØI / ISS, UiO F WP2, WP3

Christoffer Klyve FIVH M Board member Brage Vagli Østbye (2020) TØI / ISS, UiO M WP2, WP3

Elisabeth Riise Jensen FIVH F Substitute Sigurd Arntzen (2020) ITS, UiO M WP1

Inger Lise Blyverket Forbrukerrådet F Board member Elodie Belleflamme (2019) SUM, UiO F WP1

Andreas Strandskog Forbrukerrådet M Substitute Johannes Volden (2019) SUM, UiO M WP2

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 100 Appendices Appendices 101 08 Chapter 8

Master degrees (completed) Representatives from user partner institutions

Name Gender Topic Name Affiliation Gender Main research area

Clara Reich F WP2 Anja Østerli Asker kommune F WP3

Fride Sofie Spjelkavik Larsen F WP2 Elisabeth Kolrud Asker kommune F WP2

Malin Whittaker F WP3 Gyrid Mangersnes Asker kommune F WP2

Margret Sævarsdottir F WP4 Mari U. Andresen Asker kommune F WP4

Marit Hovland F WP4 Elin Schønberg Røe Asker kommune F WP4

Nora May Engeseth F WP2 Kenneth Dahlgren Aspelin Ramm M WP2

Nora Rognstad F WP1 Anne Bertine Fagerheim Bærum kommune F WP2, WP3

Torjus Lunder Bredvold M WP1 Unni Larsen Bærum kommune F WP2, WP3

Christoffer Klyve FIVH M WP2, WP4

Representatives from user partner institutions Astrid Bjerke FIVH F WP2, WP4

Name Affiliation Gender Main research area Elisabeth Riise Jenssen FIVH F WP2, WP4

Hanne Gustavsen FIVH F WP2, WP4 Julie Sjøwall Oftedal A-lab F WP2

Siv Elin Ånestad FIVH F WP2, WP4 Magnus Berg Jørgensen A-lab M WP2

Andreas Strandskog Forbrukerrådet M WP1, WP2 Pål Erik Olsen A-lab M WP2

Janne Strandrud Helsedirektoratet F WP3 Anniken Reinertsen A-lab F WP2

Kadri Tammur Helsedirektoratet F WP3 Olle Jönsson A-lab M WP2

Heidi Fadum Helsedirektoratet F WP3 Geir Haaversen A-lab M WP2

Henriette Rognlien Hurdal kommune F WP3 Bjørn Nordby Asker kommune M WP3

Gerhard Eidså Istad Nett AS M WP1

Hallvard Benum KKE M WP3, WP1

Kjetil Bjørklund KS M WP3

Jørn Inge Dørum KS M WP3

Berit Hessel Lillestrøm kommune F WP2, WP3

Ellen Anita Holterhaugen Lillestrøm kommune F WP2, WP3

Hanne Sophie Solhaug Lillestrøm kommune F WP2, WP3

Marianne Larsen Lillestrøm kommune F WP2, WP3

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 102 Appendices Appendices 103 08 Chapter 8

Representatives from user partner institutions Representatives from user partner institutions

Name Affiliation Gender Main research area Name Affiliation Gender Main research area

Øyvind Daaland Lesjø Lillestrøm kommune M WP2, WP3 Ernst Kloosterman Tromsø kommune M WP3

Øyvind Wahl Lillestrøm kommune M WP2, WP3 Grethe Frank Strand Ullensaker kommune F WP3

Lise Svenning Jensen Miljødirektoratet F WP2, WP3 Maria Rasmussen Ullensaker kommune F WP2

Marit Hepsø Miljødirektoratet F WP2, WP3 Solveig Børve Hovdal Ullensaker kommune F WP3

Kirvil Stoltenberg Miljødirektoratet F WP2, WP3 Anne Cathrine Ekroll Ullensaker kommune F WP3

Sandrine Benard Miljødirektoratet F WP2, WP3 Åge Vebostad Ullensaker kommune M WP3

Fay Madeleine Farstad Miljødirektoratet F WP2, WP3 Jeta Limani Andreassen Ullensaker kommune F WP3

Andrea Byfuglien Miljødirektoratet F WP2, WP3 Hans Petter Langbakk Ullensaker kommune M WP3

Benedicte Langseth NVE F WP1 Inger Christina Kinch Viken fylkeskommune F WP3

Cecilie Karina von Hirsch Oslo kommune F WP2, WP3 Guri Bugge Viken fylkeskommune F WP1, WP3

Astrid-Johanne Svensson Oslo kommune F WP2, WP3 Benedikte Kise Viken fylkeskommune F WP3

Cecilie Bergmann Oslo kommune F WP2, WP3 Inger Johanne Strand Viken fylkeskommune F WP3

Signe Nyhuus Oslo kommune F WP2, WP3 Cathrine Bergjordet Viken fylkeskommune F WP2

Line Tveiten Oslo kommune F WP2, WP3 Gerd Jacobsen Viken fylkeskommune F WP1, WP3

Veronica Sund Oslo kommune F WP2, WP3 Bård Strige Øyen Viken fylkeskommune M WP2, WP3

Reidun Malvik Oslo kommune F WP2, WP3 Pia Audhild Eide Husstad Viken fylkeskommune F WP2, WP3

Trine Kopstad Berentsen Solenergiklyngen F WP1 Hilde Rønning Viken fylkeskommune F WP2, WP3

Benjamin Rød Solenergiklyngen M WP1 Erlend Hanssen Viken fylkeskommune M WP2, WP3

Ola Rostad Solenergiklyngen M WP1 Tyra Risnes Viken fylkeskommune F WP1, WP3

Julie Rødje Spire F WP4

Nora May Engeseth Spire F WP3

Hilde Rognlien Spire F WP2

Aasmund Bunkholt TreFokus M WP2

Øystein Olav Miland Troms og Finnmark M WP2, WP3 fylkeskommune

Anja Johnsen Tromsø kommune F WP2, WP3

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 104 Appendices Appendices 105 08 Chapter 8

APPENDIX C Financial overview

BUDGET PER PARTNER REPORTED COST

Include budget per partner (8 years) Reported cost 2019/2020

Research institutions RCN Inkind Financial Total Research institutions COSTS FUNDING

University of Oslo 45 931 27 143 16 320 89 394 Budget Reported Reported vs Finanical & RCN budget inkind UiT - The Arctic University of Norway 7 226 1 631 8 857 University of Oslo 6 769 7 759 115 % 4 802 2 808 FNI - Fridtjof Nansen Institute 11 703 2 100 13 803 UiT - The Arctic University of Norway 660 628 95 % 29 599 CICERO - Centre for International Climate Research 12 179 2 600 14 779 FNI - Fridtjof Nansen Institute 1 370 870 64 % 300 570 TØI - The Institute of Transport Economics 9 042 1 050 10 092 CICERO - Centre for International Climate 2 098 1 657 79 % 259 1 398 OsloMet, NIBR 3 840 600 4 440 Research

Durham University 5 080 0 5 080 TØI - The Institute of Transport Economics 950 1 252 132 % 0 1 252

Total 95 000 35 124 16 320 146 445 OsloMet, NIBR 625 500 80 % 164 336

Partners 17 250 1 800 19 050 Durham University, UK 660 272 41 % 0 272

Include total 95 000 52 374 18 120 165 494 Total 13 132 12 938 99 % 5 553 7 234

Partners 2 400 1 903 79 % 2 053 0 (Figures in 1000 NOK) Include total 15 532 14 841 96 % 7 606 7 234

(Figures in 1000 NOK)

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 106 Appendices Appendices 107 08 Chapter 8

APPENDIX D Publications

Academic publications Academic publications

2019 2020 Hjorteset, Mari Andrine, and Leiren, Merethe Dotterud, Tor Westskog, Hege, Helene Amundsen, Lars Böcker. 2020. Car Sharing in Håkon Jackson Inderberg, and Petter Christiansen, and Anders Eikeland, Per Ove, and Jon Birger Böcker, Lars, and Ellinor Anderson. Norwegian Urban Areas: Examining Tim Rayner. 2020. Policy Styles, Tønnesen. 2020. Urban Contractual Skjærseth. 2019. Oil and Power In- 2020. Interest-Adoption Discrep- Interest, Intention and the Decision Opportunity Structures and Agreements as an Adaptive Govern- dustries’ Responses to EU Emissions ancies, Mechanisms of Mediation to Enrol. Transportation Research Proportionality: Comparing ance Strategy: Under What Condi- Trading: Laggards or Low-Carbon and Socio-Spatial Inclusiveness Part D: Transport and Environ- Renewable Electricity Policies in the tions Do They Work in Multi-Level Leaders? Environmental Politics 28 in Bike-Sharing: The Case of Nine ment 84 (July): 102322. https://doi. UK. International Political Science Cooperation? Journal of Environ- (1): 104–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/0 Urban Regions in Norway. Trans- org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102322. Review 00 (0): 1–15. https://doi. mental Policy & Planning 22 (4): 9644016.2019.1521961. portation Research Part A: Pol- org/10.1177/0192512120907112. 554–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523 icy and Practice 140 (October): Inderberg, Tor Håkon Jackson. 2020. 908X.2020.1784115. Solnørdal, Mette Talseth, and Sverre 266–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. Centrally Decentralising? Analys- Saglie, Inger-Lise, Tor Håkon Braathen Thyholdt. 2019. Absorptive tra.2020.08.020. ing Key Policies and Pathways in Inderberg, and Helga Rognstad. Wikstrøm, Ragnhild Dahl, and Lars Capacity and Energy Efficiency in Norway’s Electricity Transitions. 2020. What Shapes Municipalities’ Böcker. 2020. Changing Suburban Manufacturing Firms – An Empirical Böcker, Lars, Ellinor Anderson, Politics and Governance 8 (3): Perceptions of Fairness in Wind- Daily Mobilities in Response to a Analysis in Norway. Energy Policy Tanu Priya Uteng, and Torstein 173–84. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag. power Developments? Local Envi- Mobility Intervention: A Qualitative 132 (September): 978–90. https:// Throndsen. 2020. Bike Sharing Use v8i3.2874. ronment 25 (2): 147–61. https://doi. Investigation of an E-Bike Trial. doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.06.069. in Conjunction to Public Transport: org/10.1080/13549839.2020.1712342. Sustainability 12 (6): 2413. https:// Exploring Spatiotemporal, Age and Inderberg, Tor Håkon Jackson, doi.org/10.3390/su12062413. Uteng, Tanu Priya, Hans Martin Gender Dimensions in Oslo, Nor- Hanne Sæle, Hege Westskog, and Solnørdal, Mette Talseth, and Elin Espegren, Torstein S. Throndsen, way. Transportation Research Part Tanja Winther. 2020. The Dynam- Anita Nilsen. 2020. From Program Żuk, Piotr, and Kacper Szulecki. and Lars Böcker. 2019. The A: Policy and Practice 138 (August): ics of Solar Prosuming: Exploring to Practice: Translating Energy 2020. Unpacking the Right-Populist Gendered Dimension of Multimo- 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. Interconnections between Actor Management in a Manufacturing Threat to Climate Action: Poland’s dality: Exploring the Bike-Sharing tra.2020.06.009. Groups in Norway. Energy Research Firm. Sustainability 12: 10084. pro-Governmental Media on Energy Scheme of Oslo. In Gendering Smart & Social Science 70 (December): https://doi.org/doi:10.3390/ Transition and Climate Change. Mobilities, edited by Tanu Priya Bredvold, Torjus Lunder. 2020. 101816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. su122310084. Energy Research & Social Science Uteng, Hilda Rømer Christensen, Where No One Is Poor, and Energy erss.2020.101816. 66 (August): 101485. https://doi. and Lena Levin. London: Routledge. Is Abundant. FNI Report 2. Oslo, Szulecki, Kacper, and Indra org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101485. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/ Norway: Fridtjof Nansen Institute. Inderberg, Tor Håkon Jackson, Overland. 2020. Energy Democracy books/e/9780429466601/chap- Ole Magnus Theisen, and Karoline as a Process, an Outcome and ters/10.4324/9780429466601-10. Eikeland, Per Ove, and Jon Birger Hægstad Flåm. 2020. What Influ- a Goal: A Conceptual Review. Skjærseth. 2020. Oil and Pow- ences Windpower Decisions? Energy Research & Social Science er Industries’ Responses to EU A Statistical Analysis of Licensing 69: 101768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. Emissions Trading: Laggards or in Norway. Journal of Cleaner erss.2020.101768. Low-Carbon Leaders? In Pioneers, Production 273 (November): Leaders and Followers in Multilevel 122860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. Westskog, Hege, Tor H. Aase, and Polycentric Climate Govern- jclepro.2020.122860. Karina Standal, and Sølvi Tellefsen. ance, edited by Rüdiger Wurzel, 2020. Sharing among Neighbours in Duncan Liefferink, and Diarmuid Kiil, Maiken Bjerga, and David a Norwegian Suburb. Environmental Torney, 1st ed. Routledge. https:// Jordhus-Lier. 2020. Internasjonale Innovation and Societal Transitions www.routledge.com/Pioneers-Lead- lærdommer. In Grønne Tariffavtaler, 37 (December): 39–49. https://doi. ers-and-Followers-in-Multilev- edited by Jon Olav Bjergene and org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.07.010. el-and-Polycentric-Climate-Govern- Inger Marie Hagen, 90–115. Oslo: ance/Wurzel-Liefferink-Torney/p/ Gyldendal. https://www.gyldendal. book/9780367467593. no/faglitteratur/arbeidsliv/tillitsval- gt/groenne-tariffavtaler/p-785439- no/.

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 108 Appendices Appendices 109 08 Chapter 8

Popular science communication and media contributions Popular science communication and media contributions

2019 Abram, Simone, and Tom 2020i. “Fare for at kommuner Inderberg, Tor Håkon Jackson, 2020d. Omstridt omlegging gjør EUs Volden, Johannes. 2020. “Every- Pegram. 2020. “Net-Zero Carbon ofrer naturverdier for å sikre Hege Westskog, and Tanja Winther. nye klimamål lettere å nå. Energi day Life in a Pandemic: Norway.” Holtsmark, Katinka, Lars Böcker, Emissions Won’t Be Sustaina- vindkraftinntekter.” Harvest 2020. Hvem skaffer seg solcelle­ og Klima. https://energiogklima.no/ Everyday Life in a Pandemic (blog). and Tanja Winther. 2019a. “Nei, ble If Social Inequalities Aren’t Magazine, November 27, 2020. panel hjemme? Interview by Hilde nyhet/omstridt-omlegging-gjor-eus-­­ November 9, 2020. https://every- vi har ikke glemt behovet for å Addressed.” The Conversation https://www.harvestmagazine. Holsten. Forskning.no. https://forsk- nye-klimamal-lettere-a-na/. daylifeinapandemic.wordpress. kutte utslipp.” Dagens Næring- (blog). October 23, 2020. http:// no/pan/fare-for-at-kommuner-of- ning.no/a/1765191. com/2020/09/11/everyday-life-in- sliv, June 28, 2019, sec. Meninger. theconversation.com/net-zero-car- rer-naturverdier-for-a-sikre-vind- Standal, Karina. 2020a. Forsking a-pandemic-norway/. https://www.dn.no/innlegg/elbil/ bon-emissions-wont-be-sustaina- kraftinntekter. Lindberg, Marie Byskov. 2020. på energispørsmål er ikkje kjønns­ elbilpolitikk/bilavgifter/nei-vi-har- ble-if-social-inequalities-arent-ad- “Innlegg: Northconnect-regningen nøytralt. Interview by Kjerstin Westskog, Hege. 2020a. “Kom- ikke-glemt-behovet-for-a-kutte-ut- dressed-147950. 2020j. Ingen lokal vetorett mot kan halveres.” Dagens Næringsliv, Gjengedal. Kilden - Kjønnsforsk- munene er viktige brikker i klima­ slipp/2-1-628041. vindkraft Interview by Dagfinn August 12, 2020, sec. Meninger. ning.no. http://kjonnsforskning.no/ arbeidet.” Kommunal Rapport, Bredvold, Torjus Lunder. 2020. Svadberg Hatløy. https://www. https://www.dn.no/innlegg/en- nb/2020/01/forsking-pa-energis- February 21, 2020. https://www. 2019b. “Er bilkjøring en rettighet “Energifattigdom – også i Norge.” dn.no/innlegg/ingen-lokal-vetorett- ergi/kraftkabler/kraftmarkedet/­ porsmal-er-ikkje-kjonnsnoytralt. kommunal-rapport.no/arti- på lik linje med god helsehjelp?” Magasinet Klima (blog). March 9, mot-vindkraft/2-1-924107. innlegg-northconnect-regnin- cle/110354!/. Dagens Næringsliv, August 21, 2019, 2020. https://cicero.oslo.no/no/ gen-kan-halveres/2-1-854980. 2020b. “Likestilling og grønt skifte.” sec. Meninger. https://www.dn.no/ posts/klima/energifattigdom. Hansen, Arve. 2020a. Intervju om Miljødirektoratet. 2020. “Sunn Magasinet Klima (blog). March 9, 2020b. “Vi må dele enda mer.” innlegg/bilavgifter/klima-og-miljo/ forbruksbaserte klimamålinger. økonomi, rettferdige klimatiltak.” 2020. https://cicero.oslo.no/no/ Kommunal rapport, April 30, 2020. fordeling/er-bilkjoring-en-ret- Gulbrandsen, Lars. 2020a. NRK Radio. Miljødirektoratets Podcast. https:// posts/klima/likestilling-og-gront- https://www.kommunal-rapport.no/ tighet-pa-lik-linje-med-god-helseh- “Slåss mot vindmøller.” Dagbladet www.miljodirektoratet.no/tjenest- skifte. article/119143!/. jelp/2-1-623908. Podcast: Siste med Marie Simonsen. 2020b. “Grønn overvekst: Forbruk- er/klimapodcast/klimapodcast- signoransen.” Grønn overvekst: 24-sunn-okonomi-rettferdige-­ 2020c. “Strømforbruket vårt er 2020c. “Omstilling må være rett­ Letnes, Morten. 2019. Trodde du 2020b. “Klimaeliten forstår ikke Spires kampanje. May 3, 2020. klimatiltak/. viktig i det grønne skifte.” Magasi- ferdig.” Kommunal rapport, June Osloregionen har et godt kollektiv­ vindkraftmotstanden.” Aftenposten, https://overvekst.spireorg.no/forb- net Klima (blog). November 9, 2020. 19, 2020. https://www.kommu- tilbud? Bilen gir tre ganger bedre April 6, 2020, sec. Morgenutg. - ruksignoransen.html. Oftedal, Julie Sjøwall. 2020. Nytt https://cicero.oslo.no/no/posts/kli- nal-rapport.no/kronikk/omstill- jobbmuligheter i 92 prosent Trykt utg. forskningsprosjekt har fått 95 mill. ma/stromforbruket-vaart-er-viktig- ing-ma-vaere-rettferdig/120941!/. av området Interview by Mari 2020c. “Utan mindre forbruk i støtte. Interview by Silje Rønne. i-det-gronne-skifte. Gisvold Solberg. Teknisk Uke- 2020c. “Ensidig syn på vindkraft.” er det grøne skiftet ein illusjon.” Estate. https://www.estatenyheter. 2020d. “Kretsløpsøkonomien må blad. https://www.tu.no/artikler/ Aftenposten, April 21, 2020, sec. Blog. SUM-bloggen. June 11, 2020. no/aktuelt/nytt-forskningspros- Szulecki, Kacper. 2020a. “Europe’s være rettesnor.” Kommunal Rap- trodde-du-osloregionen-har-et- Morgenutg. - trykt utg. https://www.sum.uio.no/forskning/ jekt-har-fatt-95-mill-i-stotte/273289. Greenest Commission Ever Fac- port, September 25, 2020. https:// godt-kollektivtilbud-bilen-gir-tre- blogg/sum-bloggen/arve-hansen/ Røe, Per Gunnar. 2020. Hvordan es an Unprecedented Challenge www.kommunal-rapport.no/arti- ganger-bedre-jobbmuligheter-i-92- 2020d. “Uavhengig forskning om utan-mindre-forbruk-er-det-grone- kommer koronaepidemien til å på- as the Clock Ticks.” Dahrendorf cle/123597!/. prosent-av-omradet/477830. vindkraft.” Aftenposten, May 7, skiftet-ein-illus.html. virke arbeids- og levevaner framov- Forum (blog). January 16, 2020. 2020, sec. Morgenutg. - Trykt utg. er? NRK Nyheter. https://www.dahrendorf-forum.eu/ 2020e. “Fellesgoder må forvaltes 2020e. “4. juni – Stormfullt om Holsten, Hilde, Lars Böcker, and europes-greenest-commission-ev- varsomt.” Kommunal Rapport, vindkraft.” Debatten. NRK. https:// Ragnhild Dahl Wikstrøm. 2020. Skjærseth, Jon Birger. 2020a. EU er-faces-an-unprecedented-chal- November 27, 2020. https:// tv.nrk.no/serie/debatten/202006/ “Kan muligheten til å teste elsykkel og klima: Koronakrisen gir “eks- lenge-as-the-clock-ticks/. www.kommunal-rapport.no/arti- 2020 NNFA51060420. gjøre at man endrer reisevaner?” tremt verdifull lærdom” til kampen cle/125997!/. Includes nettside. October 15, 2020. mot klimakrisen. Energi og Klima. 2020b. PiS nie jest tu gorszy od PO: Aasen, Marianne, Tor Håkon Jackson 2020f. “Kommunene vil ha mer https://www.sum.uio.no/include/ https://energiogklima.no/nyhet/ politycy wciąż wierzą, że zmiana Winther, Tanja. 2020a. “Bruk av Inderberg, Karina Standal, Hanne makt i vindkraftsaker.” NRK aktuelt/aktuelle-saker/test-av-el- eu-og-klima-koronakrisen-gir-eks- klimatu nie dotyczy PolskiKrytyka solpaneler i Norge - resultater fra Sæle, Hege Westskog, and Tanja Dagsnytt 18. sykkel.html. tremt-verdifull-laerdom-til-kamp- Polityczna. https://krytykapol- forskningen.” Solenergiklyngens Winther. 2020. “Hvem kan jevne ut en-mot-klimakrisen/. ityczna.pl/serwis-klimatyczny/ podcast. http://solenergiklyngen. strømbruken sin?” Teknisk Ukeblad, 2020g. “Vi trenger en nasjonal Hultgreen, Liv Randi, Steffen klimatu-energetyka-braku- no/2020/03/23/podcast-fra-solen- May 13, 2020. https://www.tu.no/ oversikt over vindkraftens areal­ Kallbekken, Erik Stensrud Marstein, 2020b. “– Da koronakrisen traff je-strategii-rozmowa-kacper-szu- ergiklyngen/. artikler/hvem-kan-jevne-ut-stromb- beslag.” Aftenposten, July 20, 2020, Asgeir Tomasgard, and Tanja Europa var entusiasmen rundt lecki-michal-sutowski/. ruken-sin/491969. sec. Morgenutg. - Trykt utg. Winther. 2020. “Krisepakker som Green Deal allerede i ferd med å 2020b. “Kan koronapandemien forsterker krisen.” forskersonen.no. avta.” EUs Green Deal - Magasinet 2020c. Z czym kojarzy się Górny gjøre energibruken vår mer Abram, Simone. 2020. “Corona­ 2020h. “Innlegg: Vetorett for June 23, 2020. https://forskersonen. Klima (blog). April 14, 2020. https:// Śląsk? O transformacji regionu bærekraftig? Samtale med Tanja virus: World’s Response Has Slashed kommunene er ingen miljøga- no/a/1702850. cicero.oslo.no/no/posts/eus-green- Interview by Patryk Bialas. Podcast. Winther.” Pandemipodden (Pod- CO2 Emissions – Here’s How to ranti i vindkraftsaker.” Dagens deal/da-koronakrisen-traff-europa- https://slaskaopinia.pl/2020/12/01/z- cast). https://open.spotify.com/epi- Keep Them Down.” The Conversa- Næringsliv, November 18, 2020, Inderberg, Tor Håkon Jackson. 2020. var-entusiasmen-rundt-green-deal- czym-kojarzy-sie-gorny-slask-o- sode/64pVXy8C0TyP5GIToO9kih. tion (blog). March 19, 2020. http:// sec. Meninger. https://www.dn.no/ Why some municipalities accept allerede-i-ferd-med-aa-avta. transformacji-regionu/. theconversation.com/coronavirus- innlegg/energi/miljo/natur/inn- windpower farms? Interview by worlds-response-has-slashed-co- legg-vetorett-for-kommunene-er-in- Hilde Holsten. Science Norway. 2020c. Skjerpet klimamål: EU emissions-heres-how-to-keep-them- gen-miljogaranti-i-vindkraftsak- https://partner.sciencenorway. vil raskere ut av kull, olje og gass. down-134094. er/2-1-913503. no/a/1698640. Energi og Klima. https://energiog- klima.no/nyhet/eus-groenne-giv/ skjerpet-klimamal-eu-vil-raskere- ut-av-kull-olje-og-gass/. Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 110 Appendices Appendices 111 08 Chapter 8

Presentations and contributions to policy and planning processes Presentations and contributions to policy and planning processes

2019 Hansen, Arve. 2019. “Berekraftig Norby, Bjørn. 2019. “Klimasatsing 2019b. “Omstilling til lavutslipps- Bjørklund, Kjetil. 2020. “Kortreist 2020b. “Synspunkter på stortings­ forbruk i byen: Byrom og kvardags­ i Asker.” Presented at the Workshop samfunnet – hvilken rolle kan Kvalitetssatsingen.” Presented at the meldingen Vindkraft på land - Abram, Simone. 2019. “Decolonising konsum.” Presented at the Lykke Include, Oslo, Norway. kommunene spille?” Presented at Referansegruppemøte for Kortreist-­ Endringer i konsesjonsbehandlingen Energy Transitions.” Presented at og liv i byen - Klimakamp eller the Kommunenes rolle i det grønne prosjektet, Include. (Meld. St. 28 (2019-2020).” Present- the UiO:Energy Forum 2019, Oslo, trivsel? Begge deler!, October 10. Røe, Per Gunnar. 2019. “Energy skiftet, December 6. ed at the Lyttemøte om vindkraft, Norway, November 27. Spaces and Flows.” Presented at Blyverket, Inger Lise. 2020. “Så Arbeiderpartiets energi- og miljø- Hansen, Arve, Kacper Szulecki, the Workshop med brukerpartnere Westskog, Hege, and Helene enkelt at Bly forstår.” Presented fraksjon, Stortinget, Oslo, Norway, Böcker, Lars. 2019a. “Byen, miljø and Tanja Winther. 2019. “The i Include-senteret, November 28. Amundsen. 2019. “Byvekstavtaler - at the Includes kommunikasjons- September 23. og trivsel: Byen som metabolisme. Role of Energy and Infrastructure muligheter og utfordringer.” seminar. Fortetting - bilfritt – trivelig?” Kon- in Reaching Social, Environmental Standal, Karina. 2019. “Andels­ Presented at the KMD intern­ Hammer, Ragnhild. 2020. feranse presented at the Bærekraft- and Economic Development.” Panel landbruk og bærekraftig deling.” seminar, December 5. Böcker, Lars, Katinka Kristine “Sertifisering av bærekraftig rei- ig byutvikling i miljøhovedstaden discussion presented at the What Presented at the Nettverkssamling Holtsmark, and Tanja Winther. seliv.” Presented at the Referanse­ Oslo: Lykke og liv i byen - Klima­ works? Bridging Research and Økologisk Norge, November 15. Winther, Tanja. 2019a. “Presenta­ 2020. “Bærekraftige bilavgifter gruppemøte i Kortreist-prosjektet, kamp eller trivsel? Begge deler!, Policy on Sustainable Development, sjon av INCLUDE.” Presented at 2025 - innspill fra enkeltforskere Include. Oslo, Norway, October 10. Oslo, Norway, October 14. Stokstad, Sigrid. 2019. “Hva er the FME-kontaktmøte høsten 2019, tilknyttet INCLUDE til Finans­ kommunenes formelle ansvar for September 20. departementet.” Hirsch, Cecilie, and H. Sollie. 2020. 2019b. “The Dynamics of Urban Hepsø, Marit. 2019. “Miljødirekto­ det grønne skiftet?” Presented at “Oslo kommune og Include.” Metabolism in the Face of Digitali­ ratets forskningsbehov.” Presented the Møte i Polyteknisk forening, 2019b. “Establishing ‘INCLUDE’ Böcker, Lars, and Per Gunnar Røe. Presented at the Workshop Include, sation and Changing Lifestyles.” at the Workshop Include, Oslo, December 4. as a Transdisciplinary Research 2020. “Inclusive Urban Epidemic Oslo, Norway. Conference presented at the UiO: Norway. Centre on Environmentally Friend- Resilience: Investigating and Mit- Energy Forum 2019, Oslo, Norway, Strandskog, Andreas. 2019. ly Energy in Norway: Reflections igating Uneven COVID-19 Impacts Huber, Robert, Stefan Cetkovic, November 27. Hovdal, Solveig Børve. 2019. “Forbrukerrådets perspektiver på on the Process towards Successful on Mobility, Health and Wellbeing.” Tomas Maltby, and Kacper Szulecki. “Inkluderende planprosesser.” WP1.” Presented at the Workshop Proposal – and Some Challenges Presented at the Storbykonferansen 2020. “Is Populism a Challenge to Bridge, Gavin, and Tanja Winther. Presented at the Workshop Include, Include, Oslo, Norway. Ahead.” Presented at the 1st Energy 2020, October 28. European Energy and Climate 2019. “Opening Remarks: The Role Oslo, Norway. & Environment Clustering Event, Policy? Unpacking the Causal Links of Energy and Infrastructure in Szulecki, Kacper. 2019. “Participant September 23. Departementene. 2020. “Handling- and Empirical Evidence.” Confer- Reaching Social, Environmental and Inderberg, Tor Håkon Jackson. in the Panel ‘PROSUMERS: splan fysisk aktivitet 2020-2029. ence Presentation presented at Economic Development.” Presented 2019a. “FLEXEFFECT i FME IN- Challenges and Opportunities in 2019c. “INCLUDE - INCLUsive Decar- Sammen om aktive liv. I-1196 B.” the ECPR General Conference, at the What Works 2019: Bridging CLUDE - integrasjon og arbeids- the Energy Transition.’” Presented bonisation and Energy Transition.” Departementene. Innsbruck (Online), August 24. research and policy on sustainable deling.” Presented at the FLEXEF- at the Sustainable Energy Week, Presented at the Dialogmøte Forb- development, Oslo, Norway, FECT kick-off møte, Oslo, Norway, June 18. rukerrådet - INCLUDE, October 21. Engeseth, Nora, and Martin Sortland Jevnaker, Torbjørg. 2020. “Hva er October 14. September 9. Eick. 2020. “Byutvikling - hvordan formålet med fjerde energimarkeds­ Tønnesen, Anders. 2019a. “By- 2019d. “INCLUDE - et nytt FME kombinere sosial og miljømessig pakke?” Presented at the EUs Ericson, Torgeir. 2019. “Problem­ 2019b. “The Institute Sector’s områdene i NTP og rammeverk for Samfunn: planer, mål og forsknin- bærekraft.” Presented at the Spires fjerde energimarkedspakke - SVs stillinger fra NVEs perspektiv.” Research on Sustainability: byvekstavtaler.” Presented at the gen senteret bygger på.” Presented vinterseminar, Oslo, Norway, Stortingsgruppe, Oslo, Norway, Presented at the Workshop Include, Perspectives from The Fridtjof NTP-konferansen, November 25. at the Statusseminaret 2019, February 22. January 13. Oslo, Norway. Nansen Institute.” Presented at October 30. the Workshop NTNU Bærekraft, 2019b. “Creating Public Acceptance Foss, Lene. 2020. “Relevance of the Jordhus-Lier, David. 2020a. “Ap- Folvik, Kjersti. 2019. “Kjeller Oslo, Norway, November 21. for Multilevel Cooperation in Green PhD Project- Responsibility and pell.” Presented at the Arbeidslivets Flyplass.” Presented at the Transitions Oslo and Gothenburg.” Stakeholders.” Presented at the klimauke, Kick-off Frokostseminar, Workshop Include. 2019c. “The Need for Justice Presented at the UiO:Energy Forum, 2020 Kappaseminar. February 3. Perspectives in the Norwegian Oslo, Norway, November 27. Gulbrandsen, Lars. 2020. “Syns­ Energy Transition.” Presented at Andersen, May Kristine, Jeta Foss, Lene, and Mette Solnørdal. 2020b. “Klimaengasjement i fag­ punkter på stortingsmeldingen the UiO:Energi Energiforum 2019, West, Jennifer Joy. 2019. “Address- Andreassen, Anne Catherine Ekroll, 2020. “Masteroppgave med FME bevegelsen.” Presented at the Broer Vindkraft på land - Endringer i November 27. ing the Existential Threats of Climate Grethe Frank Strand, Christine Include.” Presented at the Pre- til framtiden - Norske fagforeninger, konsesjonsbehandlingen (Meld. St. Change.” Presented at the 11th Haakstad, and Maria Rasmussen. sentasjon for studenter ved UiT. miljøorganisasjoner og kirkesam- 28 (2019-2020).” Presented at the Jenkins, Kirsten, and Tanja Winther. Annual Bergen Educational Conver- 2020. “Byutvikling på Jessheim.” funn, Oslo, Norway, February 28. Lyttemøte om vindkraft, Arbeider- 2019. “Energy Justice – Promises sation: Meeting the Challenges of Presented at the Course for students Gulbrandsen, Lars. 2020a. partiets energi- og miljøfraksjon, and Limitations of a Novel Concept.” Existential Risks through Education- of landscape architecture, NMBU, “Miljøhensyn og medvirkning i 2020c. “Hvorfor er ikke lærerne Stortinget, Oslo, Norway, Presented at the UiO:Energy Forum al Innovation, November 1. Ås, Norway, September 7. vindkraftsaker.” Presented at the i klimastreik?” Presented at the September 23. 2019, Oslo, Norway, November 27. Seminar ved Norges Naturvernfor- Bærekraftig arbeidsliv og grønn Westskog, Hege. 2019a. “Multi-Level Andreassen, Jeta. 2020. “Byliv bund, Oslo, Norway, January 15. tariff, Utdanningsforbundet, Johnsen, Anja. 2019. “Tromsø kom- Governance of Wicked Problems - på Jessheim.” Presented at the Online, August 24. munes perspektiver for Include.” towards a Flexible and Co-Managing Utvikling av gode byrom - Presented at the Workshop Include, Practice.” Presented at the UiO: Ullensaker bibliotek, Ullensaker, Oslo, Norway. Energy Forum 2019, Oslo, Norway, Norway, February 17. November 27.

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 112 Appendices Appendices 113 08 Chapter 8

Presentations and contributions to policy and planning processes Presentations and contributions to policy and planning processes

2020d. “Pedagoger i en særstilling? Rødje, Julie. 2020a. “Hvordan ivare- 2020f. “Include - steder i endring.” 2020c. “Green, Grey or No Deal? 2020c. “Kjønnsperspektiver på 2020f. “Sprawiedliwa transformacja Bærekraft på arbeidsplassen.” ta sosial rettferdighet i klimapolitik- Presented at the Møte med bruker- EU Climate and Energy Policies.” energiomstilling.” Presented at the Gornego Slaska.” Presented at the Presented at the FIKS Webinar: ken?” Presented at the Møte i Natur partner Aspelin Ramm, October 26. Presented at the FNI Workshop, Håp gjennom handling i klimakris- BioMasto Seminar, Online, Tverrfaglighet - bærekraftig ut- og ungdom Dovre, January 8. Online, May 15. ens tid - Multiconsult, October 7. November 17. vikling, Online, September 21. 2020g. “Hvordan kan bærekraftig 2020b. “Hvordan sikre sosialt byutvikling bli sosialt inkluderen- 2020d. “EUs Green Deal og konse- 2020d. “Flexeffect prosjektet: 2020g. “Poland: Developing Renew- Jordhus-Lier, David, and Frida rettferdig klimapolitikk.” Presented de?” Presented at the Frokostmøte kvenser for Norge.” Presented at the Tiltak for fleksibelt strømforbruk ables in a Land of Coal.” Presented Hambro Angell. 2020. “Fagbev- at the Møte i Sosialistisk ungdom om sosial bærekraft, November 10. NMBU-Fakultetet for Miljøvitenskap i husholdninger.” Presented at the at the A carbon-free future for egelsen og klimakamp: Hvilken Vestfold og Telemark, May 9. og Naturforvaltning, Online, Referansegruppemøte Include WP1, Russia. What will it be? Russian rolle spiller fagbevegelsens og de Røe, Per Gunnar, and Sigrid May 29. Online, November 27. Renewable Energy Association, tillitsvalgte?” Presented at the 2020c. “Spire og eksterne samar- Stokstad. 2020. “Inkluderende by- Moscow, November 25. https:// Bibliotekarforbundets­ landsmøte, beid.” Presented at the Styremøte og regional utvikling. Hvordan kan 2020e. “European Green Deal and Stokstad, Sigrid. 2020a. “Hvem bellona.ru/2020/11/26/bezuglerod- October 20. Spire, August 23. omstillingen til lavutslippssamfun- Consequences for Climate Policy.” har ansvaret for overgang til lav­ noe-budushhee-rossii/. net være sosialt inkluderende?” Presented at the NUPI Seminar, utslippssamfunnet, og hvilke inter- Lindberg, Marie Byskov. 2020a. 2020d. “Hvordan sikre sosialt Presented at the Storbykonferansen, June 24. esser ivaretas på veien?” Presented 2020h. “Conspiracy Theories and “Market Design as Enabler of Sus- rettferdig klimapolitikk.” Presented sesjon om inkluderende by- og at the Masterklasse 2020 om sosialt the Energy Transition: Russian Oil tainability Transitions? A Compar- at the Møte i Sosialistisk ungdoms regional utvikling, October 29. 2020f. “EUs Green Deal og bærekraftig planlegging, Conspiracies, the Blackout Myth, ison of the German and the Nordic miljøutvalg, October 17. havvind.” Presented at the CICERO February 25. and Governance through Fear.” Electricity Market.” Presented at the Rognlien, Henriette. 2020. Prosjekt-workshop, Online, Presented at the Social innovation International Sustainability Tran- Rødje, Julie, and Nora Engeseth. “Inkludering av innbyggere i utbyg- November 5. 2020b. “The Role of Municipalities in the energy transition - TU Delft, sitions Conference 2020 (IST2020), 2020. “Folkets matsystem.” gingsprosjekter.” Presented at the in Achieving a Low Carbon Soci- Delft, December 4. https://www. Vienna, Austria, August 18. Presented at the Nettverksmøter Includes kommunikasjonsseminar, 2020g. “EUs håndtering av karbon­ ety?” Presented at the Master’s tudelft.nl/siet/events/conspira- for organisasjoner om sosialt og Online. lekkasje: status og utsikter.” lecture at SUM, UiO, Oslo, Norway, cy-theories-and-the-energy-transi- 2020b. “EUs klimapolitikk: Interne miljømessig matsystem. Presented at the Seminar Norsk May 27. tion/. dragkamper og internasjonal Rognlien, Hilde, and Amalie Hilde. Forening for Energiøkonomi, posisjonering.” Presented at the Røe, Per Gunnar. 2020a. “Include 2020. “Verksted: Boligpolitikk.” Online, November 23. Szulecki, Kacper. 2020a. “The Szulecki, Kacper and Øverland, UD aspirantenes fagdager, Oslo, - A Centre for Socially Inclusive Presented at the Globaliserings­ Chernobyl Effect - Anti-Nuclear Indra. 2020. “Energy Democracy Norway, September 28. Solutions through Co-Creation konferansen 2020, May 9. 2020h. “European Green Deal: Protest and the Forging of Poland’s and Its Limits.” Presented at the with Stakeholders.” Presented Konsekvenser for klimapolitikken Democracy 1986-1990.” Presented ECPR General Conference 2020, Lindberg, Marie Byskov, and Per at the Sustainable Development Sæle, Hanne, and Marianne Aasen. i EU og Norge.” Seminar presented at the Oslo School of Environmental August 24. Ove Eikeland. 2020. “System Costs Goals Conference, February 6. 2020. “Foreløpige resultater fra at the Seminar Mellomkirkelig råd, Humanities Seminar, May 26. or Subsidy Costs? Market Design spørreundersøkelse blant norske Online, December 3. Tønnesen, Anders. 2020a. “Byvekst­ Effects in Advanced Energy Tran- 2020b. “Sosiale implikasjoner av husholdninger: oppfatninger 2020b. “Making Just Transitions avtaler: Hvordan skape aksept for sitions.” Presented at the European regional plan for Oslo og Akershus og holdninger til ny nettleie.” 2020i. “European Green Deal: Possible: It’s Identity, Stupid!” omstillingstiltak som berører flere Consortium for Political Research (eller av post-suburban planleg- Presented at the Prosjektseminar Konsekvenser for klimapolitikk og Presented at the Das Progressive styringsnivåer?” Presented at the (ECPR) General Conference 2020, ging).” Presented at the Nasjonal med brukerpartnere, Include, Parisavtalen.” Seminar presented at Zentrum Seminar, June 20. Inkluderende energiomstilling: te- August 24. masterklasse - Forum for utdanning Online, November 27. the Seminar Naturvernforbundet, maer, perspektiver og erfaringer fra i samfunnsplanlegging, Oslo, Online, December 9. 2020c. “Czy musimy zatrzymać tidligere forskning. CIENS frokost- Miljødirektoratet. 2020a. “Klima- Norway, February 26. Sævarsdottir, Margret, Marit wzrost? Od pandemii do zielone- seminar, Oslo, Norway, January 29. budsjett.” https://www.miljodirek- Hovland, and Ole Smørdal. 2020. Smørdal, Ole. 2020. “Bærekraft go ładu.” Presented at the Kultura toratet.no/myndigheter/klimaar- 2020c. “Include: A Centre for “Matvinn - samarbeid mellom i fagfornyelsen.” Presented at the Liberalna, August 6. https://www. 2020b. “Transport and Public beid/kutte-utslipp-av-klimagasser/ Socially Inclusive Decarbonization frivillige og skolen om bærekraft.” CICERO-seminar, Oslo, Norway, youtube.com/watch?v=xchp7e- Planning in the Norwegian klima-og-energitiltak/klimabuds- and Energy Transition.” Presented Presented at the Nettverkssam- February 12. JtzZE&ab_channel=KulturaLiberalna. Context.” Presented at the UiO jett/. at the Research seminar, May 6. ling - Nasjonalt forskernettverk for Forelesning, May 27. bærekraft og utdanning, October 21. Standal, Karina. 2020a. “Gender 2020d. “The Spaces for Freedom: 2020b. “Kollektivtransport som 2020d. “Include. Inclusive Public Perspectives on the Global Energy Pandemic, the Climate Crisis and 2020c. “Nullvekstmål og byvekst­ klimatiltak i tettsteder.” Webinar, Spaces.” Presented at the Oslo Skjærseth, Jon Birger. 2020a. Transition.” Presented at the Energy a Green Liberalism for the 21st avtaler i det grønne skiftet.” August 25. Urban Arena, September 11. “Innspill til DNV-GLs 2030 Energy Innovation: How to deliver on the Century.” Presented at the Warsaw Presented at the CIENS løsningspils, Outlook.” Europeen Green Deal - L’innovation European Forum, October 20. September 19. Olsen, Pål Erik. 2020. “Brukerpart- 2020e. “Include. Inclusive Decar- energetique; au service du pacte neres rolle i forskning.” Presented bonization and Energy Transition.” 2020b. “Grønn, grå eller ingen vert Europeen, January 17. 2020e. “The Chernobyl Effect: Anti-­ 2020d. “Sosial rettferdighet i det at the Public Spaces in the Inclusive Presented at the Presentasjon for Deal? EUs klima/energipolitikk Nuclear Protest and the Forging of grønne skiftet.” Presented at the City - Oslo Urban Arena 2020, Oslo, ansatte i a-lab arkitekter, og konsekvenser for Norge i krise­ 2020b. “Likestilling og kjønnspers- Poland’s Democracy.” Presented KLP kommunenes klimakonferanse, Norway, October 9. September 18. tider.” Presented at the CICERO pektiver på klima og energiomstil­ at the ASEEES 2020 VIRTUAL October 27. Prosjekt-workshop, Online, May 14. ling.” Presented at the Foredrag for CONVENTION, Online, November 5. Kvinneutvalget i Nei til EU, Oslo, Norway, January 28.

Include annual report 2020 Include annual report 2020 114 Appendices Appendices 115 08 Chapter 8

Presentations and contributions to policy and planning processes

Design: Anagram Design as Tønneson, Johan. 2020. “Klart språk Winther, Tanja. 2020a. “Dialogmøte behøver ikke være enstemmig.” med OED om Include.” Presented Photos from Include’s image bank by: Presented at the Includes at the Dialogmøte Olje- og Energi­ Benjamin Ward kommunikasjonsseminar. departementet, January 8. Olle Jönsson Mari Aftredt Mørtvedt Tveiten, Line. 2020. “Lokalmatsats- 2020b. “Forskningssenteret Include: Hege Westskog ing i Oslo kommune.” Presented at Det rasjonale, planer og potensielle Iris Leikanger the Referansegruppemøte prosjekt utfordringer.” Presented at the Kortreist i Include. Inkluderende energiomstilling: Contact: temaer, perspektiver og erfaringer Westskog, Hege. 2020a. “Omstilling fra tidligere forskning, Oslo, Tanja Winther, Head of Include til lavutslippssamfunnet - hva og Norway, January 29. [email protected] hvordan.” Presented at the Høring- swebinar regional plan Vestfold og 2020c. “Frokostseminar - Inkluder- Hege Westskog, FME Coordinator Telemark Fylkeskommune, Online, ende energiomstilling: temaer, per- [email protected] August 21. spektiver og erfaringer fra tidligere forskning.” Presented at the CIENS Hilde Holsten, Communication Adviser 2020b. “Prosjekt delingsøkonomi.” Frokostseminar - Inkluderende en- [email protected] Presented at the Styringsgrup- ergiomstilling: temaer, perspektiver pemøte porteføljestyret NFR, og erfaringer fra tidligere forskning, Visiting address: September 16. January 29. Centre for Development and the Environment Sandakerveien 130 2020c. “Omstilling til lavutslipps- 2020d. “Innspill til nytt Olje for 1st and 2nd floor samfunnet. Hva, hvem og hvordan?” utvikling.” Presented at the Norad. 0484 OSLO Presented at the Klimakonferanse, Idemyldring rundt nytt Ofu, May 19. Innlandet, October 14. Postal address: 2020e. “Dialgmøte med Utdannings- Post Box 1116 2020d. “Kortreiste kretsløp – forbundet.” August 21. Blindern bakgrunn og muligheter.” Presented 0317 OSLO at the Referansegruppemøte pros- 2020f. “Include - Forskningssenter jekt Kortreist - Include, November 4. for sosialt inkluderende omstilling.” Presented at the Presentasjon for 2020e. “Kortreist Kvalitet - et ram- ledergruppen Viken fylkeskom- Follow us on Twitter! @FME_Include meverk for bærekraftig omstilling.” mune, September 18. https://www.sum.uio.no/include/ Presented at the Kortreist Kvalitet Nettverkssamling, November 9. 2020g. “Equitable Energy Transi- tion.” Presented at the Oslo Launch: Follow us on Facebook /FMEInclude 2020f. “Kommunen som endring- The 2020 Report of the Lancet saktør i klimaarbeidet.” Presented at Countdown on Health and Climate the Kurs for Utdanningsforbundets Change, December 4. klimakontakter, November 10. Winther, Tanja, Karina Standal, Westskog, Hege, and Helene Kacper Szulecki, and Simone Amundsen. 2020. “Byvekstavtaler Abram. 2020. “How to Achieve a – muligheter og utfordringer.” Socially Inclusive and Just Transi- Presented at the Presentasjon for tion to a Low-Carbon Society? Inn- Alver kommune, January 29. spill Til Kunnskapsdepartementet Fra Include-Forskere.” Wethal, Ulrikke, Arve Hansen, and Johannes Volden. 2020. “Everyday Winther, Tanja, Hege Westskog, Life in a Pandemic. Endringer Tor Håkon Jackson Inderberg, i Sosiale Praksiser: Tilpasning, Per Gunnar Røe, and Ole Smørdal. Eksperimentering Og Bærekraft.” 2020. “Møte Med 22 Brukerpartnere Include is funded by the Research Council of Presented at the Storbykonferansen Include.” May 19. Norway through the programme Centres for 2020, October 28. Environment-Friendly Energy Research (FME Samfunn), partners in Include and UiO:Energy.

Include annual report 2020 Report title 116 Appendices Chapter title 117 Include | Research centre for socially www.sum.uio.no/include/ Visiting address: Sandakerveien 130 inclusiveReport title energy transitions PB 1116 Blindern, 0317 Oslo 0484 Oslo, Norway 118 Chapter title