DOCSLIB.ORG

The Zoological Paradox

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Zoological Paradox Syracuse University SURFACE School of Architecture Dissertations and Architecture Senior Theses Theses 5-2015 The Zoological Paradox Thorfun Chutchawanjumrut Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/architecture_theses Part of the Architecture Commons Recommended Citation Chutchawanjumrut, Thorfun, "The Zoological Paradox" (2015). Architecture Senior Theses. 242. https://surface.syr.edu/architecture_theses/242 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Architecture Dissertations and Theses at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Architecture Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PARADOX RTHEEIMAGINING Z OOZOOLOGICAL ARCHITECTURE THORFUN CHUTCHAWANJUMRUT Architecture Thesis Spring 2015 Syracuse University Bachelor of Architecture 1 2 “In many ways, choice equates to freedom. The organism with the most choices can be said to have the greatest free- dom” - Jon Coe, 1992 3 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT Situation 7 Contention 9 The Story of Gus 12 Zoochosis 14 WHAT’S BEING DONE? Enrichments 22 Jon Coe 26 Heini Hediger 28 WHAT’S AT STAKE? Evolution of Animal Display 30 Precedents and Projection of Zoos 36 Why we need Zoos? 38 DESIGN PHASE Site Selection 40 Conceptualization 48 Participating Species 50 Design Approach 54 Sketches / Thought Process 88 ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY 90 5 6 Bar biting ABSTRACT Pacing situation Circling Rocking Head-bobbing Tongue-playing Head-Weaving Swaying Neck twisting Head weaving Tongue playing . These unsettling symptoms of “zoochosis” are exhibited by zoo animals under conditions of stress, depression, frustration, and boredom. Despite a century’s worth of attempts to enhance the quality of zoos and to justify their existence, zoos continue to neglect the animals’ physilogical and psychological welfare. Zoos do not evolve with time. “Naturalistic” exhibits and expansive enclosures are features that exist only to please the eyes of human visi-tors. These “enhance- ments” do little to address the persistent issue of the abnormal yet repetitive behaviors displayed by the animals. While humans have the means to voluntarily escape stressful con- ditions, zoo animals are fixed in their single unchanging, static enclosure. Furthermore, zoos’ banal and monotonous ways of ed- ucating visitors continue to misrepresent and generalize animals’ natural behaviors. A visitor remains a spectator. An animal remains a spectacle. 7 8 ABSTRACT contention Through on-site field investigation, studies of animal be- haviors, and Jon Coe’s zoo enrichment principles, this thesis pro- poses that zoo architec-ture should prioritize the needs of the an- imals by incorporating behavioral and environmental enrichments into its design. Enrichments refer to the pro- cess of providing the appropriate behav-ioral and environmental stimuli that foster the animals to exhibit their own natural behaviors. Adapting Jon Coe’s strategies and Heini Hediger’s concept of territory as precedents, “A Zoological Paradox” proposes the re- imagining of the zoo typology by integrating existing enrich-ment methodologies, as well as allowing human visitors to interact and engage in the process of enriching the animals’ well-being. Through strategies of introducing choices and novelty to the “Animal Folly” enclosure, and allowing a visitor’s participation, the reimagined zoo offers the animals a sense of freedom within captivity; a temporary relief from stress within their confines. A continuous network of “corridors” replaces conventional enclosures; reflecting each ani- mal’s territorial path-ways and further providing a sense of choice and freedom. Shifting the visitor’s role from a mere spectator to an active partici- pant not only enhances his or her experience at the zoo, but also re- shapes the percep-tion that these enrichments are what really mat- ter. Rather than a “naturalistic facade,” enrichments become the most crucial component for animals born and raised in captivity. A visitor’s notion of the zoo may be defamiliarized. An animal’s well-being is addressed and enhanced. 9 “Everyone has stress... The thing is that while [us] humans can have stress, it usually doesn’t mean that [our] welfare is in jeopardy, partly because humans can remove themselves from stressful situations and have things to look forward to.” 10 For the most part, animals live in the present. If their present is a small caged enclosure, then that is a stressful existence from which they cannot escape.” (source: care2.com) 11 12 THE STORY OF GUS a brief intermission | a case study nytimes.com Born in Toledo Zoo, Ohio back in 1988, Gus was a beloved, iconic, mischie- vous polar bear of Central Park Zoo, New York City. He was visited by over 20 million people during his life time and enjoyed a much longer lifespan than his average captive friends of more than 27 years. This 700-pound furry creature did not become famous for being the largest attraction in the zoo, nor for any particular talents he might possess; but rather for a very curious behavior. The mid-1990s was when visitors first saw Gus compulsively swimming fig- ure eights in his pool for no obvious reasons. He can be seen doing this for sometimes up to 12 hours a day. He was not trained to do this as a performance. He was not expressing his natural behavior as seen in the wild. Gus’s neuroticism earned him the nickname “the bipolar bear,” a dose of Prozac, and $25,000 worth of behavioral therapy. Like many other animals, Gus copes with his unstimulating or small environ- ments through this stereotypic behavior. 13 What happened to Gus, happened to many other zoo animals living under the same condition. This condition is better known as “ZOOCHOSIS” [noun] AKA “Animal psychopathology”, “Behavioral disorder”, “Ste- reotypical behavior” A condition of obsessive, repetitive behaviors that serves only as coping mechanism to the stress zoo animals experience while living in unsuitable, artificial environments with little no to stimulation or enrichment. 14 A ZOOLOGICAL DILEMMA 100% 0.00009 % Gus was forced to live in an enclosure that is 0.00009 percent of the size his range would have been in his natural habitat of the Artic.15 ZOOCHOSIS psychosis within captivity Why should we care? In captivity, wild animals face a number of chal- lenges in which evolution has not prepared them SYMPTOMS for. The artificial environment of a zoo can some- times lead to an animal feeling bored, frustrated, and stressed. The result of this is a development Bar biting of a stereotypic behaviour of the animal that is both compulsive and unnatural. Pacing The modern theory of the root cause of these Circling stereotypic behaviours explains that zoochosis Rocking results from brain disfunction that is the result of stress. But the correlation between the stress at Head-bobbing the time when the behaviour is being performed and the actual behaviour itself is inconsequential. Tongue-playing Although stress may have caused the develop- Head-Weaving ment of this behaviour, that behaviour is not per- petuating. Swaying The question is, at what point does chronic stress Neck twisting become a welfare problem? Stress is ordinary Head weaving part of life. There is a difference between being stressed and having a poor quality of life or wel- Tongue playing fare. Vomiting What are other potential causes of Zoochosis? Coprophagia There are number of factors that can trigger Overgrooming and result in stereotypical behaviors of Zoocho- Self mutilation sis. First and foremost, most animals are forced to live in artificial environments with little stim- Regurgitation ulation, enrichment or opportunity to hide from the public gaze. Most often they are being held in Reingestation captive environment that does not cater to their Trichotillomania species-specific needs. Zookeeper all too often generalize the animals’ behavior and not put into Coprophilla account individual needs. All animals are differ- ent; they have different background, tempera- Caprophagia ments, and personality. Apathy Another cause is called ‘invasive intervention’ Prolonged Infantility which refers to the restriction of movement, train- Abnormal Aggression ing using negative reinforcement techniques, be- ing trained to preform unnatural behaviours. Ani- mals are often relocated as too many of the same species of the same zoo. This caused a disruption of family or pack units for the sake of breeding. .... Last but not least, drugs and medical fertility con- trol are also a factor that is often overlooked as The list goes on the cause of Zoochosis. Access the link below to view videos of some of the symptoms of Zoochosis: < http://www.bornfree.org.uk/campaigns/zoo-check/ captive-wildlife-issues/abnormal-behaviours/ > 16 Neck-twisting Pacing Swaying Self-mutilation Coprophilia 17 EXISTING STRATEGIES (that fell short) what’s been done that are not working Naturalistic Decorating Large and Expansive Filling up an exhibit with foliage, trees, To a certain extent, spacious enclosures rocks, and boulders to make the space ap- help alleviate the symptoms of Zoochosis, pear as naturalistic as possible only serves but most often these spaces are void of to depict an ideal vision of the wilderness activities or enrichments the animals can as perceived by visitors. It does very little engage in order to stimulate their natural to address the symptoms of Zoochosis. behaviors. Non-species-specific Generalization Physical Needs Zoos continue to generalize animal needs Fulfilling the animal’s physical needs is no not by species and provide them with the longer su©cient to enhance the animal’s few bare essentials of food, water, shelter, psychological well-being. When the strug- and some space to walk around. gle to survive is no longer a priority, nothing is left to stimulate or enrich their welfare. 18 PREDICTED STRATEGY (that fell short) A Zootopia in Disguise what’s been visualized but retain existing issues At first glance, Zootopia may have successfully dissolve all barriers between hu- mans and animals.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Today a Treasure Yesterday a Dream
    Yesterday a Dream Today a Treasure 2010 REPORT TO THE COMMUNITY We hope you will enjoy this annual report as it takes you on a journey through the last Table of Contents 100 years at the Saint Louis Treasured Memories Zoo. Many changes have been made throughout the Y esterday a Dream, Today a Treasure…Tomorrow a Promise ..........................................................3 years, but the heart of the Memories Abound .......................................................................................................................5 Zoo remains the same: A Zootennial Celebration ..............................................................................................................7 Animals Always. Enriching the Community .............................................................................................................9 JoAnn Arnold Animals Always ..........................................................................................................................11 Chair, Saint Louis Zoological The Living Promise – A Campaign for the Future .........................................................................13 Park Subdistrict Commission Jeffrey P. Bonner, Ph.D. Donors, Volunteers and Staff Dana Brown President & CEO St. Louis Zoological Park Subdistrict Commission .......................................................................18 Saint Louis Zoo Association Board of Directors ...........................................................................18 Endowment Trust Board of Directors ...........................................................................................20
    [Show full text]
  • Did Eating Human Poop Play a Role in the Evolution of Dogs?
    WellBeing International WBI Studies Repository 4-24-2020 Did Eating Human Poop Play a Role in the Evolution of Dogs? Harold Herzog Animal Studies Repository Follow this and additional works at: https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/sc_herzog_compiss Recommended Citation Herzog, Harold, Did eating Human Poop Play a Role in the Evolution of Dogs? (2020), 'Animals and Us' Blog Posts, Psychology Today, 24 August, 118. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/animals-and- us/202008/did-eating-human-poop-play-role-in-the-evolution-dogs This material is brought to you for free and open access by WellBeing International. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of the WBI Studies Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Did Eating Human Poop Play a Role in the Evolution of Dogs? The consumption of human feces may have influenced canine evolution. Posted Aug 24, 2020 Source: Photo by K. Thalhotter/123RF “Poop is central to the story of how dogs came into our lives," write Duke University dog researchers Brian Hare and Vanessa Woods in their wonderful new book, Survival of the Friendliest: Understanding Our Origins and Rediscovering Our Common Humanity. I think they may be right. Molly, our beloved Labrador retriever, certainly loved to eat poop. Sometimes she would chow down on her own feces, and at other times, she preferred excrement of the cows that lived behind our house. Mary Jean and I found this practice (coprophagia) disgusting. We were not alone. Ben Hart and his colleagues at the University of California at Davis School of Veterinary Medicine surveyed nearly 3,000 dog owners about their pet’s penchant for poop.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Anxiety
    Tackling Anxiety in Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder Roma Vasa MD Kennedy Krieger Institute Associate Professor Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Webinar Disclosure Statement Kennedy Krieger Institute’s Center for Autism and Related Disorders (CARD) does not take responsibility for information shared in this public event. Please keep all questions general and do not disclose personal health information (PHI) during the question and answer (Q&A) segment. This webinar will be recorded. By attending this webinar, you are consenting to being recorded. The Q&A segment is NOT anonymous. Polling – REQUIRED FOR CEUs! Instructions: • On your smartphone, laptop, or tablet, go to www.Slido.com or scan the QR code. • Enter the event code: #RV30. • Enter your name and email. • Click “Join.” • The online polling platform Slido will be used to track CEUs and monitor attendance. • Please note that the Q&A segment is not anonymous. Training Sponsor: Pathfinders for Autism • A special thank you to the training sponsor! “Pathfinders for Autism is pleased to be able to support CARD and sponsor this workshop on a very important topic. Pathfinders for Autism works to support and improve the lives of individuals affected by autism through expansive, individualized programming, and by providing resources, training, workshops, information, and activities free of charge. Go to www.pathfindersforautism.org to use Pathfinders for Autism’s provider directory and to register for upcoming workshops and free family fun events or call them at 443- 330-5341.” – Neal Lichter, Program Director, Pathfinders for Autism • To learn more about Pathfinders for Autism, please visit their website at https://pathfindersforautism.org/.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Perceptions of Behavioral Enrichment: Assumptions Gone Awry
    Zoo Biology 17:525–534 (1998) Public Perceptions of Behavioral Enrichment: Assumptions Gone Awry M.E. McPhee,1* J.S. Foster,2 M. Sevenich,3 and C.D. Saunders4 1University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 2Seneca Zoo Society, Rochester, New York 3Disney’s Animal Kingdom, Lake Buena Vista, Florida 4Brookfield Zoo, Brookfield, Illinois More and more, zoos are integrating behavioral enrichment programs into their management routines. Given the newness of such programs on an official level, however, there are an increasing number of enrichment decisions based on as- sumption. Enrichment is typically not provided on exhibit, especially for exhib- its considered to be more naturalistic, because it is assumed to affect visitors’ experience negatively. To test that assumption, visitors were interviewed in front of four exhibits—an outdoor barren grotto, an outdoor vegetated grotto, an in- door immersion exhibit, and an outdoor traditional cage—each with either natu- ral, nonnatural or no enrichment objects present. Specifically, we wanted to know whether 1) the exhibit’s perceived educational message, 2) the animal’s per- ceived “happiness,” and 3) the visitor perceptions of enrichment, the naturalism of animal’s behavior, and zoo animal well-being changed as a function of object type. Overall, the type of enrichment object had little impact on visi- tor perceptions. In the outdoor barren grotto, only visitor perceptions of ex- hibit naturalism were affected by object type. In the outdoor vegetated grotto, object type influenced visitors perceptions of enrichment and exhibit natu- ralism. For the indoor immersion exhibit, general perceptions of enrichment and the perceived naturalism of the animal’s behavior were affected.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    A A COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL Fig. A1 A is for aardvark ( Orycteropus afer ). Dictionary of Zoo Biology and Animal Management: A guide to terminology used in zoo biology, animal welfare, wildlife conservation and livestock production, First Edition. Paul A. Rees. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Published 2013 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 1 2 A A See ADENINE (A) Causes loss of appetite, poor growth and, in extreme A aardvark ( Orycteropus afer ) Traditionally the animal cases, death from bleeding. that represents the letter A in the alphabet. It is the abomasum In RUMINANTS , the fourth (and last) only extant member of the mammalian family stomach. It is a ‘ secretory stomach ’ the lining of Orycteropodidae. Adults are the size of a small pig, which produces hydrochloric acid and PROTEO- with little body hair (Fig. A1 ). The aardvark is NOC- LYTIC ENZYMES , and is therefore equivalent to the TURNAL and lives in underground burrows. It pos- stomach of other mammals. sesses large ears, a long snout and a long thin tongue aboral Located on the side of the body opposite which it uses for collecting insects. Its limbs are the mouth, especially in relation to ECHINODERM specialised for digging ( see also FOSSORIAL ). Aard- anatomy. Compare ORAL varks occur in Africa south of the Sahara. abortion, miscarriage The natural or intentional ter- AAZK See A MERICAN A SSOCIATION OF Z OO K EEP- mination of a pregnancy by the removal or expul- ERS (AAZK) . See also KEEPER ASSOCIATION sion of the EMBRYO or FOETUS . Spontaneous AAZPA American Association of Zoological Parks abortion (miscarriage) may result from a problem and Aquariums, now the A SSOCIATION OF that arises during the development of the embryo Z OOS AND A QUARIUMS (AZA) .
    [Show full text]
  • Species Image of Mandible Dietary Ecology
    Species Image of Mandible Dietary Ecology Acomys cahirinus Omnivore – Seeds, fruits, (Northeast African insects, food scavenged from humans, shrubs (green leaves), spiny mouse) molluscs, carrion. Omnivore - (Nowak, 1999) Aplodontia rufa Herbivore – forbs, grasses, ferns. (mountain beaver) Specialised Herbivore – (Samuels, 2009). Bathyergus suillus Herbivore – grass, sedge, roots, (Cape dune mole- bulbs, tubers. rat) Specialised Herbivore – (Samuels, 2009). Cannomys badius Herbivore – roots, bamboo, (Lesser bamboo rat) shoots, grasses. Occasional seeds and fruits. Specialised Herbivore – (Samuels, 2009). Capromys pilorides Omnivore – Bark leaves, fruits, (Desmarest’s hutia) small vertebrates, ground and tree level vegetation. Omnivore - (Nowak, 1999). Castor canadensis Herbivore – Leaves, bark, bud (North American and roots, cambium (softer tissue of trees beneath bark). Beaver) Specialised Herbivore – (Samuels, 2009). Cavia porcellus Herbivore – Leaves, roots and (Domestic guinea tubers, fruits, flowers, lettuce etc. (rely on humans). pig) Specialised Herbivore (Cavia aperea) - (Samuels, 2009). Cricetomys Omnivore – Fruits, vegetables, gambianus nuts, insects, molluscs, roots (sweet potatoes etc.). (Northern giant pouched rat) Omnivore – (Nowak, 1999). Ctenomys opimus Diet for this species has not (Highland tuco-tuco) been extensively documented. Assuming that it is like other tuco-tuco, it is a herbivore – Grasses and roots primarily. Specialised Herbivore (Ctenomys conoveri) - (Samuels, 2009). Dasyprocta (Agouti - Species unknown. Assuming
    [Show full text]
  • Public Workshop, a Lot of It Is Stemming from C
    FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION CENTER FOR BIOLOGICS EVALUATION AND RESEARCH CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH FECAL MICROBIOTA FOR TRANSPLANTATION: SCIENTIFIC AND REGULATORY ISSUES CENTER FOR BIOLOGICS, EVALUATION AND RESEARCH (FDA) AND THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES (NIH) [This transcript has not been edited or corrected, but appears as received from the commercial transcribing service. Accordingly, the Food and Drug Administration makes no representation as to its accuracy.] Bethesda, Maryland Thursday, May 2, 2013 A G E N D A Welcome and Opening Remarks: KAREN MIDTHUN, MD Director, CBER/FDA FRED CASSELS, PhD Branch Chief of Enteric and Hepatic Diseases,DMID/NIAID Session I: The Microbiome in Health and Disease Part I: Moderator: MELODY MILLS, PhD NIAID/NIH Panelists: LITA PROCTOR, PhD National Human Genome Research Institute PHILLIP TARR, MD Washington University, School of Medicine in St. Louis YASMINE BELKAID, PhD National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases ERIC G. PAMER, MD Sloan-Kettering Institute VINCENT B. YOUNG, MD, PhD University of Michigan Session II: The Microbiome in Health and Disease Part II Moderator: DAVID RELMAN, MD Panelists: ROBERT BRITTON, PhD Michigan State University LINDA S. MANSFIELD, MS, VMD, PhD Michigan State University EMMA ALLEN-VERCOE, PhD University of Guelph * * * * * P R O C E E D I N G S (8:43 a.m.) MS. MIDTHUN: Good morning, can you hear me? Okay, very good. Well, first off I'd like to welcome all of you. Thank you so much for coming today. I'm Karen Midthun, the Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research which is one of the Centers within the Food and Drug Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Mental Misrepresentation in Non-Human Psychopathology
    Biosemiotics (2017) 10:195–210 DOI 10.1007/s12304-017-9299-2 Mental Misrepresentation in Non-human Psychopathology Krystyna Bielecka1 & Mira Marcinów2 Received: 25 October 2016 /Accepted: 10 July 2017 /Published online: 4 August 2017 # The Author(s) 2017. This article is an open access publication Abstract In this paper, we defend a representational approach to at least some kinds of non-human psychopathology. Mentally-ill non-human minds, in particular in delusions, obsessive-compulsive disorders and similar cognitive states, are traditionally under- stood in purely behavioral terms. In contrast, we argue that non-human mental psy- chopathology should be at least sometimes not only ascribed contentful mental repre- sentation but also understood as really having these states. To defend this view, we appeal to the interactivist account of mental representation, which is a kind of a constructive approach to meaning. We follow Mark Bickhard in assuming that only an organism – either human or non-human – capable of detecting its own misrepre- sentations is representational. However, under his autonomy-based account of biolog- ical function these minds are incapable of misrepresentations because these minds are, ex hypothesi, unable to detect error in such representations. To solve this problem, we argue that adding a historical dimension – as in Millikan’s view on mental represen- tations – to Bickhard’s account of function makes mental misrepresentation of mentally-ill minds possible. Using Bickhard’s dynamic account of function, it is possible to explain why delusions and other mental disorders can be seen as locally functional. However, an etiological dimension can further explain why misrepresenta- tions seem to be globally dysfunctional.
    [Show full text]
  • Coprophagia” Is Defined As the Ingestion of Any Type of Faeces, and Is a Common Complaint of Dog Owners
    Homeward Bound Golden Retriever Rescue Golden Rule Training Canine Corprophagia "Coprophagia” is defined as the ingestion of any type of faeces, and is a common complaint of dog owners. For humans it can seem disgusting and embarrassing for our dogs to engage in this behavior. It is somewhat a natural act for dogs, but as we domesticate our pets, we expect these behaviors to disappear; however, they are still animals with natural instincts! A dog may eat its own faeces, those of another dog or the faeces of another species. Dogs commonly eat the faeces of cats with which they share a household (or farm animals). The only circumstance in which coprophagia is considered a normal behavior is when a mother dog eats the faeces of her pups from the time of their birth until about 3 weeks of age. It is felt that the mother does this to keep the area clean until the pups are able to move away from it to defecate. A clean area may be less likely to attract predators in the wild. What behaviors are linked with corprophagia? Coprophagia may be a behavioral or a medical problem. It may be a type of behavioral coping mechanism for an animal that is caught in a stressful situation, such as a sudden environmental change. It can also be a tactic to avoid punishment for having a bowel movement in an inappropriate area. Coprophagia can inadvertently be taught to a puppy or adult during housetraining; if the puppy or dog is scolded or he sees the owner 'cleaning up' the bowel movement in the house, the puppy may learn to 'hide' the bowel movement by eating it.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Book a Nervous Breakdown Pdf Free Download
    A NERVOUS BREAKDOWN PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Anton Chekhov | 128 pages | 03 Mar 2016 | Penguin Books Ltd | 9780241251782 | English | London, United Kingdom A Nervous Breakdown - Wikipedia Get updates. Give today. Request Appointment. Nervous breakdown: What does it mean? Products and services. Free E-newsletter Subscribe to Housecall Our general interest e-newsletter keeps you up to date on a wide variety of health topics. Sign up now. What does it mean to have a nervous breakdown? Answer From Daniel K. With Daniel K. Show references Gove WR. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. Parker G. The mechanics of a "breakdown. After a flood, are food and medicines safe to use? Alzheimer's: New treatments Alzheimer's Caregiver depression Understanding the difference between dementia types Alzheimer's: Can a head injury increase my risk? Mediterranean diet Alzheimer's disease Alzheimer's disease: Can exercise prevent memory loss? Alzheimer's drugs Alzheimer's genes Alzheimer's nose spray: New Alzheimer's treatment? Alzheimer's or depression: Could it be both? Alzheimer's prevention: Does it exist? Alzheimer's stages Alzheimer's test: Detection at the earliest stages Ambien: Is dependence a concern? Antidepressant withdrawal: Is there such a thing? Antidepressants and alcohol: What's the concern? Antidepressants and weight gain: What causes it? Antidepressants: Can they stop working? Antidepressants: Side effects Antidepressants: Selecting one that's right for you Antidepressants: Which cause the fewest sexual side effects? Antiphospholipid syndrome Antidepressants and pregnancy Atypical antidepressants Atypical depression Axona: Medical food to treat Alzheimer's Back pain Bedtime routines: Not just for babies Benefits of being bilingual Binge-eating disorder Blood Basics Borderline personality disorder Breast-feeding and medications Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Jim Full Resume 2015.Indd
    Education Jim Brighton, Principal 1985 Master of Landscape Architecture, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 1973 Bachelor of Science, Ornamental Horticulture, Cornell University Registration 1990 Landscape Architect, State of Washington 2006 Landscape Architect, State of Texas, State of Ohio 2012 Landscape Architect, States of Utah and Oklahoma Professional Memberships 1993-present American Society of Landscape Architects, ASLA 1998-present American Zoo and Aquarium Association Professional Practice 2003-present Principal: PJA Architects + Landscape Architects, P.S., Seattle, Washington 1999-2003 Principal: Jones & Jones Architects & Landscape Architects, Seattle, Washington 1994-1999 Senior Associate: Jones & Jones Architects & Landscape Architects, Seattle, Washington 1990-1994 Associate: Jones & Jones Architects & Landscape Architects, Seattle, Washington 1985-1990 Senior Associate: Arnold Associates, Princeton, New Jersey Publications Elephant trails at the National Zoo Resumé The American Association of Zoos and Aquariums, National Conference, 2010 Orangutan Sanctuary: Design for Natural Behaviors The American Association of Zoos and Aquariums, National Conference, 2007 A Walk Through Time: Pine Jog Environmental Center Interpretive Trail National Association for Interpretation, Annual Workshop, 2004 Zoo Master Planning & Exhibit Design for the 21st Century The AZA/CACG, Zoo Design Symposium, Shanghai, China P.R., 2004 Collaboration, Cooperation & Commitment: A New Tapir Habitat at Summit Zoo 2nd Annual Tapir Symposium, Panama City, Panama, 2004 Trail of the Elephant: Entertainment, Education, and Enrichment. The American Association of Zoos and Aquariums, National Conference, 2003 Tell Me a Story: Education & Entertainment -- The Reid Park Zoo Master Plan. The American Association of Zoos and Aquariums, Western Regional Conference, 2002 Active Interpretation at the Trail of the Elephant Exhibit. National Association for Interpretation, Annual Workshop, 2001 Planning Eco-Tourism Facilities: Suriname, A Case Study.
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Abstracts
    XIIIXIII th SLOVAKSLOVAK ANDAND CZECHCZECH PARASITOLOGICALPARASITOLOGICAL DAYSDAYS XIII. SLOVENSKÉ A ČESKÉ PARAZITOLOGICKÉ DNI ParasitesParasites inin thethe HeartHeart ofof EuropeEurope 2 BOOK OF ABSTRACTS Košice, Slovakia,Sl ki Congress C g Hotel H t l Centrum C May 21 – 25, 2018 The editors hold no responsibility for any content, inaccuracy or language errors in the abstracts. EDITORS MARTINA MITERPÁKOVÁ, ZUZANA VASILKOVÁ GRAPHIC DESIGN ZUZANA VASILKOVÁ ISBN 978 – 80 - 968473 – 9 – 6 ©SLOVAK SOCIETY FOR PARASITOLOGY AT SAS KOŠICE, MAY 2018 OORRGAANINIZZEED BY TTHHE Sllovakovak Soocietyciety fforor Paarasitologyrasitology Innstitutestitute ooff Paarasitology,rasitology, Sllovakovak Accademyademy ooff Scciencesiences Czzechech Societyociety fforor Paarasitologyrasitology ORGANIZING COMMITTEE CHAIR: MARTINA MITERPÁKOVÁ MEMBERS: DANIELA ANTOLOVÁ ZUZANA HURNÍKOVÁ EVA NOVÁKOVÁ VERONIKA TARAGEĽOVÁ ZUZANA VASILKOVÁ JUDGING PANEL FOR STUDENT COMPETITION CHAIR: IVICA HROMADOVÁ Institute of Parasitology SAS, Košice, SK MEMBERS: DAVID BRUCE CONN Harvard University and Berry College, US LIBOR MIKEŠ Charles University, Faculty of Science, Prague, CZ DANIEL MŁOCICKI Medical University of Warsaw, PL MARIÁN VÁRADY Institute of Parasitology SAS, Košice, SK JAN VOTÝPKA Charles University, Faculty of Science, Prague, CZ GRZEGORZ ZALEŚNY Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, PL TABLE OF CONTENTS Session I – Helminths: Diversity, Taxonomy and Ultrastructure……….......................……………1 Session II – Parasitology in Genomic, Immunology
    [Show full text]