DOCSLIB.ORG

Species of Uncertain Affinities Currently Assigned to Glenodinium

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Species of Uncertain Affinities Currently Assigned to Glenodinium Species of uncertain affinities currently assigned to Glenodinium Genus 1. Glenodinium Ehrenberg 1836, p. 174 Type species: Glenodinium cinctum Ehrenberg 1836 The genus Glenodinium was described in a very incomplete way by Ehrenberg in 1836. In the following decades the name G. cinctum was used in most works dealing with freshwater dinoflagellates, sometimes accompanied by descriptions and illus- trations which differed considerably from one another. The generic name has been used with criteria that varied more extensively over the years than for any other dinoflagellate genus. For many authors throughout the twentieth century the name was applied on the basis of the negative character of not having visible structure on the theca (Meunier 1919), despite the definition of the genus based on a range of tabulations in Schiller’s (1935a) monographic treatment in Rabenhorst’s Kryp- togamen-flora. When Wołoszyńska (1916) described the genus Sphaerodinium, she concluded, after publication of her paper, that it was identical to Glenodinium and that her species Sphaerodinium limneticum was identical to Glenodinium cinctum (Wołoszyńska 1917). Instead of transferring her species of Sphaerodinium to the older genus Glenodinium, she did the opposite and transferred Ehrenberg’s Gleno- dinium cinctum to Sphaerodinium. This resulted in confusion and the exclusion of the type species from the genus Glenodinium in most identification manuals. Most species below will undoubtedly be transferred to other genera, and the identity of the type species will have to be resolved. Because of their very thin amphiesmal plates, species of this group occupy an intermediary position between the “naked” gymnodinioids and the heavily “armored” peridinioids and gonyaulacoids. Some may prove to be peridinioids, other are perhaps woloszynskioids. Key to species of uncertain affinities currently referred to Glenodinium: 1a Cells with eyespot .......................................................................................... 2 1b Cells without eyespot ................................................................................... 10 2a Eyespot horseshoe-shaped or triangular ......................................................... 3 2b Eyespot comma-shaped or round ................................................................... 5 3a Eyespot horseshoe-shaped ������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 4 3b Eyespot triangular ............................................................ 2. G. amphiconicum 4a Cells dorsoventrally strongly compressed ���������������������������������� 7. G. gessneri 4b Cells barely compressed dorsoventrally ......................................1. G. cinctum 5a Chloroplasts present, sulcus does not extend to apex ..................................... 6 5b Chloroplasts absent, sulcus extends to apex ......................10. G. leptodermum 6a Chloroplasts blue-green or glaucous ..........................................8. G. glaucum 6b Chloroplasts yellow or brown ������������������������������������������������������������������������ 7 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2018 Ø. Moestrup, A. J. Calado, Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa, Bd. 6 – Freshwater Flora of Central Europe, Vol. 6: Dinophyceae, Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56269-7 454 Species of uncertain affinities currently assigned to Glenodinium 7a Cells strongly compressed dorsoventrally ���������������������������������� 7. G. gessneri 7b Cells not or only slightly compressed dorsoventrally ..................................... 8 8a With numerous chloroplasts ........................................................................... 9 8b With few large rounded chloroplasts, cells shaped as a parallelogram ............. ...................................................................................................13. G. peisonis 9a Cingulum slightly descending, sulcus forms circular area on epicone ............. .................................................................................................17. G. segriense 9b Cingulum circular, sulcus forms very slight indentation on epicone ���������������� ..........................................................................................18. G. vindobonense 10a Edges of the sulcus terminate in antapical tooth .................4. G. denticulatum 10b No teeth at the antapical end of the sulcus edges ..........................................11 11a Cells disc-shaped .......................................................................................... 12 11b Cells may be slightly compressed dorsoventrally but not disc-shaped ......... 13 12a Cells very flat, posterior end flat, undulated, cell 46 µm long; in eutrophic ponds ............................................................................................. 11. G. limos 12b Cells ca. 14 µm thick and 32 µm long; in acid bogs ...................... 12. G. mezii 13a Chloroplasts absent.............................................................16. G. punctulatum 13b Chloroplast present ....................................................................................... 14 14a Epicone narrower than hypocone ........................................... 3. G. dangeardii 14b Epicone as wide as or wider than hypocone ................................................. 15 15a Epicone wider than hypocone (overhanging) .......................15. G. pulvisculus 15b Epicone as wide as hypocone (occasionally hypocone wider) ��������������������� 16 16a Epicone with apical pore ........................................... 14. G. pseudostigmosum 16b No apical pore .............................................................................................. 17 17a With numerous chloroplasts ......................................................................... 18 17b With two chloroplasts, one at each end ................................ 6. G. eurystomum 18a Cell with wide indentation at the right anterior end ............5. G. emarginatum 18b Apical end without emargination ................................................................. 19 19a Cells 20–24 µm long, sometimes less ................................... 9. G. helicozoster 19b Cells 30–40 µm long ................................................................17. G. segriense 1. Glenodinium cinctum Ehrenberg sensu auctorum (Fig. 404) Glenodinium cinctum Ehrenberg 1836, p. 174; Ehrenberg 1838, p. 257, pl. XXII, fig. XXII ≡Peridinium oculatum Dujardin 1841, p. 374 ≡ Peridinium cinctum (Eh- renberg) Claparède & J. Lachmann 1859, p. 404, nom. illeg. (non Peridinium cinc- tum (O. F. Müller) Ehrenberg) Glenodinium berghii Lemmermann 1900b, p. (117) (Glenodinium cinctum sensu Bergh 1881, pp 247, 248, 251, figs 65–67) Cells ovoid to subspherical, epi- and hypocone of approximately equal size. Epi- cone hemispherical to rounded conical, hypocone rounded conical. Cingulum cir- cular, sulcus does not extend into the epicone. Cells yellow, with smooth theca. Large horseshoe-shaped eyespot. Ehrenberg (1838) indicated the size as 47 µm; his illustrations show a range of 33–53 µm in length, width 33–50 µm, thickness 30 µm. Variants by subsequent authors include differences in relative length of the epi- and hypocone and a differently shaped, or even absent, eyespot. Ecology: mesotrophic to eutrophic ponds, more rarely in lakes (Lemmermann 1910). Geographical distribution: Germany. Genus 1. Glenodinium 455 b d g a c f e h Fig. 404 Glenodinium cinctum Ehrenberg (a–f after Ehrenberg 1838; g, h after Bergh 1881). a, b ventral views; c dorsal view; d, e right lateral views; f cell division?; g emp- ty theca seen from the dorsal side; h recently divided cells within mucilage of division cyst 2. Glenodinium amphiconicum J. Schiller 1955, p. 49, pl. IX, fig. 49 (“ampliconicum”) (Fig. 405) Cells biconical, slightly flattened dorsoventrally. Epi- and hypocone of almost equal size. Sides straight or slightly concave when seen from the ventral side, the cells thereby acquiring the appearance of a parallelogram. Cingulum barely de- scending. Sulcus on hypocone only, deeper in front, more flattened posteriorly. With numerous yellowish-brown chloroplasts, shaped as oval plates. The number of chloroplasts varies with the season, fewer in spring, more in summer and au- tumn. Eyespot almost triangular, located in the anterior part of the sulcus, anterior edge of the eyespot slightly concave. Thin cell cover present. Cells 28–30 µm long, 24–26 µm wide. Ecology: Lake Neusiedl, Austria, May–October 1951. Geographical distribution: Austria. ac dfg be Fig. 405 Glenodinium amphiconicum J. Schiller (after Schiller 1955). a, b ventral and dorsal views; c, d ventral views with triangular eyespot; e vertical view; f round protoplast retracted inside enlarged cell cover; g biconical cell 456 Species of uncertain affinities currently assigned to Glenodinium ab d c e Fig. 406 Glenodinium dangeardii Lemmermann (after Dangeard 1888). a ventral view; b, c cell division in immotile stage before and after liberation of daughter cells, respectively; d immotile cell surrounded by a thick layer of mucilage; e resting cyst 3. Glenodinium dangeardii Lemmermann 1910, p. 634, figs 37–40 (p. 580) (Fig. 406) Glenodinium cinctum sensu Dangeard (1888, pp 127, 128, pl. V, figs 1–5) Epicone hemispherical, smaller than the conical hypocone which is rounded at the antapex. Cingulum circular. Sulcus extends to the antapex, and slightly onto the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Molecular Data and the Evolutionary History of Dinoflagellates by Juan Fernando Saldarriaga Echavarria Diplom, Ruprecht-Karls-Un
    Molecular data and the evolutionary history of dinoflagellates by Juan Fernando Saldarriaga Echavarria Diplom, Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg, 1993 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES Department of Botany We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA November 2003 © Juan Fernando Saldarriaga Echavarria, 2003 ABSTRACT New sequences of ribosomal and protein genes were combined with available morphological and paleontological data to produce a phylogenetic framework for dinoflagellates. The evolutionary history of some of the major morphological features of the group was then investigated in the light of that framework. Phylogenetic trees of dinoflagellates based on the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene (SSU) are generally poorly resolved but include many well- supported clades, and while combined analyses of SSU and LSU (large subunit ribosomal RNA) improve the support for several nodes, they are still generally unsatisfactory. Protein-gene based trees lack the degree of species representation necessary for meaningful in-group phylogenetic analyses, but do provide important insights to the phylogenetic position of dinoflagellates as a whole and on the identity of their close relatives. Molecular data agree with paleontology in suggesting an early evolutionary radiation of the group, but whereas paleontological data include only taxa with fossilizable cysts, the new data examined here establish that this radiation event included all dinokaryotic lineages, including athecate forms. Plastids were lost and replaced many times in dinoflagellates, a situation entirely unique for this group. Histones could well have been lost earlier in the lineage than previously assumed.
    [Show full text]
  • Spirogyra and Mougeotia Zornitza G
    Volatile Components of the Freshwater AlgaeSpirogyra and Mougeotia Zornitza G. Kamenarska3, Stefka D. Dimitrova-Konaklievab, Christina Nikolovac, Athanas II. Kujumgievd, Kamen L. Stefanov3, Simeon S. Popov3 * a Institute of Organic Chemistry with Centre of Phytochemistry. Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia 1113. Bulgaria. Fax: ++3592/700225. E-mail: [email protected] b Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University, Sofia 1000, Bulgaria c Institute of Soil Sciences and Agroecology, “N. Pushkarov”, Sofia 1080, Bulgaria d Institute of Microbiology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia 1113, Bulgaria * Author for correspondence and reprint requests Z. Naturforsch. 55c, 495-499 (2000); received February 4/March 13, 2000 Antibacterial Activity, Mougeotia, Spirogyra, Volatile Compounds Several species of freshwater green algae belonging to the order ZygnematalesSpirogyra ( crassa (Ktz.) Czurda, S. longata (Vauch.) Ktz., and Mougeotia viridis (Ktz.) Wittr.) were found to have a specific composition of the volatile fraction, which confirms an earlier pro­ posal for the existence of two groups in the genusSpirogyra. Antibacterial activity was found in volatiles from S. longata. Introduction and Hentschel, 1966). Tannins (Nishizawa et al., 1985; Nakabayashi and Hada, 1954) and fatty acids While the chemical composition and biological (Pettko and Szotyori, 1967) were also found in activity of marine algae have been studied in Spyrogyra sp. Evidently, research on chemical depth, freshwater algae have been investigated composition of Spirogyra and Mougeotia species less intensively, especially those belonging to Zyg- is very limited, especially on their secondary me­ nemaceae (order Zygnematales). The most nu­ tabolites, which often possess biological activity. merous representatives of this family in the Bul­ The volatile constituents of Zygnemaceae algae garian flora are generaSpirogyra, Mougeotia and are of interest, because such compounds often Zygnema, which inhabit rivers and ponds.
    [Show full text]
  • Patrons De Biodiversité À L'échelle Globale Chez Les Dinoflagellés
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emerciements* ! Remerciements* A!l'issue!de!ce!travail!de!recherche!et!de!sa!rédaction,!j’ai!la!preuve!que!la!thèse!est!loin!d'être!un!travail! solitaire.! En! effet,! je! n'aurais! jamais! pu! réaliser! ce! travail! doctoral! sans! le! soutien! d'un! grand! nombre! de! personnes!dont!l’amitié,!la!générosité,!la!bonne!humeur%et%l'intérêt%manifestés%à%l'égard%de%ma%recherche%m'ont% permis!de!progresser!dans!cette!phase!délicate!de!«!l'apprentiGchercheur!».!
    [Show full text]
  • The Planktonic Protist Interactome: Where Do We Stand After a Century of Research?
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/587352; this version posted May 2, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Bjorbækmo et al., 23.03.2019 – preprint copy - BioRxiv The planktonic protist interactome: where do we stand after a century of research? Marit F. Markussen Bjorbækmo1*, Andreas Evenstad1* and Line Lieblein Røsæg1*, Anders K. Krabberød1**, and Ramiro Logares2,1** 1 University of Oslo, Department of Biosciences, Section for Genetics and Evolutionary Biology (Evogene), Blindernv. 31, N- 0316 Oslo, Norway 2 Institut de Ciències del Mar (CSIC), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta, 37-49, ES-08003, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain * The three authors contributed equally ** Corresponding authors: Ramiro Logares: Institute of Marine Sciences (ICM-CSIC), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta 37-49, 08003, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. Phone: 34-93-2309500; Fax: 34-93-2309555. [email protected] Anders K. Krabberød: University of Oslo, Department of Biosciences, Section for Genetics and Evolutionary Biology (Evogene), Blindernv. 31, N-0316 Oslo, Norway. Phone +47 22845986, Fax: +47 22854726. [email protected] Abstract Microbial interactions are crucial for Earth ecosystem function, yet our knowledge about them is limited and has so far mainly existed as scattered records. Here, we have surveyed the literature involving planktonic protist interactions and gathered the information in a manually curated Protist Interaction DAtabase (PIDA). In total, we have registered ~2,500 ecological interactions from ~500 publications, spanning the last 150 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Protocols for Monitoring Harmful Algal Blooms for Sustainable Aquaculture and Coastal Fisheries in Chile (Supplement Data)
    Protocols for monitoring Harmful Algal Blooms for sustainable aquaculture and coastal fisheries in Chile (Supplement data) Provided by Kyoko Yarimizu, et al. Table S1. Phytoplankton Naming Dictionary: This dictionary was constructed from the species observed in Chilean coast water in the past combined with the IOC list. Each name was verified with the list provided by IFOP and online dictionaries, AlgaeBase (https://www.algaebase.org/) and WoRMS (http://www.marinespecies.org/). The list is subjected to be updated. Phylum Class Order Family Genus Species Ochrophyta Bacillariophyceae Achnanthales Achnanthaceae Achnanthes Achnanthes longipes Bacillariophyta Coscinodiscophyceae Coscinodiscales Heliopeltaceae Actinoptychus Actinoptychus spp. Dinoflagellata Dinophyceae Gymnodiniales Gymnodiniaceae Akashiwo Akashiwo sanguinea Dinoflagellata Dinophyceae Gymnodiniales Gymnodiniaceae Amphidinium Amphidinium spp. Ochrophyta Bacillariophyceae Naviculales Amphipleuraceae Amphiprora Amphiprora spp. Bacillariophyta Bacillariophyceae Thalassiophysales Catenulaceae Amphora Amphora spp. Cyanobacteria Cyanophyceae Nostocales Aphanizomenonaceae Anabaenopsis Anabaenopsis milleri Cyanobacteria Cyanophyceae Oscillatoriales Coleofasciculaceae Anagnostidinema Anagnostidinema amphibium Anagnostidinema Cyanobacteria Cyanophyceae Oscillatoriales Coleofasciculaceae Anagnostidinema lemmermannii Cyanobacteria Cyanophyceae Oscillatoriales Microcoleaceae Annamia Annamia toxica Cyanobacteria Cyanophyceae Nostocales Aphanizomenonaceae Aphanizomenon Aphanizomenon flos-aquae
    [Show full text]
  • Differentiating Two Closely Related Alexandrium Species Using Comparative Quantitative Proteomics
    toxins Article Differentiating Two Closely Related Alexandrium Species Using Comparative Quantitative Proteomics Bryan John J. Subong 1,2,* , Arturo O. Lluisma 1, Rhodora V. Azanza 1 and Lilibeth A. Salvador-Reyes 1,* 1 Marine Science Institute, University of the Philippines- Diliman, Velasquez Street, Quezon City 1101, Philippines; [email protected] (A.O.L.); [email protected] (R.V.A.) 2 Department of Chemistry, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo City, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan * Correspondence: [email protected] (B.J.J.S.); [email protected] (L.A.S.-R.) Abstract: Alexandrium minutum and Alexandrium tamutum are two closely related harmful algal bloom (HAB)-causing species with different toxicity. Using isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantita- tion (iTRAQ)-based quantitative proteomics and two-dimensional differential gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE), a comprehensive characterization of the proteomes of A. minutum and A. tamutum was performed to identify the cellular and molecular underpinnings for the dissimilarity between these two species. A total of 1436 proteins and 420 protein spots were identified using iTRAQ-based proteomics and 2D-DIGE, respectively. Both methods revealed little difference (10–12%) between the proteomes of A. minutum and A. tamutum, highlighting that these organisms follow similar cellular and biological processes at the exponential stage. Toxin biosynthetic enzymes were present in both organisms. However, the gonyautoxin-producing A. minutum showed higher levels of osmotic growth proteins, Zn-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase and type-I polyketide synthase compared to the non-toxic A. tamutum. Further, A. tamutum had increased S-adenosylmethionine transferase that may potentially have a negative feedback mechanism to toxin biosynthesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Microzooplankton Composition and Dynamics in Lake Erie
    MICROZOOPLANKTON COMPOSITION AND DYNAMICS IN LAKE ERIE A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty of the University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Kenneth M. Moats May 2006 MICROZOOPLANKTON COMPOSITION AND DYNAMICS IN LAKE ERIE Kenneth M. Moats Thesis Approved: Accepted: ______________________________ ______________________________ Advisor Department Chair Peter J. Lavrentyev Richard L. Londraville ______________________________ ______________________________ Committee Member Dean of the College R. Joel Duff Ronald F. Levant ______________________________ ______________________________ Committee Member Dean of the Graduate School David M. Klarer George R. Newkome ______________________________ Date ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my graduate advisor Dr. Peter Lavrentyev for introducing me to the study of aquatic microbial ecology and for the opportunity to conduct this study. The importance of his guidance and expertise in every aspect of this research cannot be understated. I would also like to thank him for the patience, support, and encouragement he provided throughout my tenure. I would also like to thank the other members of my advisory committee, Dr. Joel Duff and Dr. David Klarer, for the helpful advice and comments offered during the preparation of this manuscript. I would like to extend my thanks to Dr. Klarer and the staff of Old Woman Creek NERR for logistical support and the sharing of unpublished data on Old Woman Creek. I thank Dr. Frank Jochem of Florida International University, Dr. Henry Vanderploeg and Dr. Stuart Ludsin of Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, and the Captain and crew of the US EPA R/V Lake Guardian for logistical support during the Lake Erie experiments.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Mediterranean Free-Living Dinoflagellates Institutional Rate: € 938,-/Approx
    Botanica Marina Vol. 46,2003, pp. 215-242 © 2003 by Walter de Gruyter • Berlin ■ New York Subscriptions Botanica Marina is published bimonthly. Annual subscription rate (Volume 46,2003) Checklist of Mediterranean Free-living Dinoflagellates Institutional rate: € 938,-/approx. SFr1 50 1 in the US and Canada US $ 938,-. Individual rate: € 118,-/approx. SFr 189,-; in the US and Canada US $ 118,-. Personal rates apply only when copies are sent to F. Gómez a private address and payment is made by a personal check or credit card. Personal subscriptions must not be donated to a library. Single issues: € 178,-/approx. SFr 285,-. All prices exclude postage. Department of Aquatic Biosciences, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan, [email protected] Orders Institutional subscription orders should be addressed to the publishers orto your usual subscription agent. Individual subscrip­ tion orders must be sent directly to one of the addresses indicated below. The Americas: An annotated checklist of the free-living dinoflagellates (Dinophyceae) of the Mediterranean Sea, based on Walter de Gruyter, Inc., 200 Saw Mill River Road, Hawthorne, N.Y. 10532, USA, Tel. 914-747-0110, Fax 914-747-1326, literature records, is given. The distribution of 673 species in 9 Mediterranean sub-basins is reported. The e-mail: [email protected]. number of taxa among the sub-basins was as follows: Ligurian (496 species), Balear-Provençal (360), Adri­ Australia and New Zealand: atic (322), Tyrrhenian (284), Ionian (283), Levantine (268), Aegean (182), Alborán (179) and Algerian Seas D. A. Information Services, 648 Whitehorse Road, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • CONTROL of CELL DIVISION in the FILAMENTOUS, GREEN ALGA ZYGNEMA by Robert Dale Staker a Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the D
    Control of cell division in the filamentous green alga Zygnema Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Staker, Robert Dale, 1945- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 25/09/2021 05:42:58 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/318132 CONTROL OF CELL DIVISION IN THE FILAMENTOUS, GREEN ALGA ZYGNEMA by Robert Dale Staker A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE WITH A MAJOR IN BOTANY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 7 S STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfill­ ment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library, Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Permian–Triassic Non-Marine Algae of Gondwana—Distributions
    Earth-Science Reviews 212 (2021) 103382 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Earth-Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/earscirev Review Article Permian–Triassic non-marine algae of Gondwana—Distributions, natural T affinities and ecological implications ⁎ Chris Maysa,b, , Vivi Vajdaa, Stephen McLoughlina a Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden b Monash University, School of Earth, Atmosphere and Environment, 9 Rainforest Walk, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The abundance, diversity and extinction of non-marine algae are controlled by changes in the physical and Permian–Triassic chemical environment and community structure of continental ecosystems. We review a range of non-marine algae algae commonly found within the Permian and Triassic strata of Gondwana and highlight and discuss the non- mass extinctions marine algal abundance anomalies recorded in the immediate aftermath of the end-Permian extinction interval Gondwana (EPE; 252 Ma). We further review and contrast the marine and continental algal records of the global biotic freshwater ecology crises within the Permian–Triassic interval. Specifically, we provide a case study of 17 species (in 13 genera) palaeobiogeography from the succession spanning the EPE in the Sydney Basin, eastern Australia. The affinities and ecological im- plications of these fossil-genera are summarised, and their global Permian–Triassic palaeogeographic and stra- tigraphic distributions are collated. Most of these fossil taxa have close extant algal relatives that are most common in freshwater, brackish or terrestrial conditions, and all have recognizable affinities to groups known to produce chemically stable biopolymers that favour their preservation over long geological intervals.
    [Show full text]
  • Durinskia Baltica and Kryptoperidinium Foliaceum
    The Complete Plastid Genomes of the Two ‘Dinotoms’ Durinskia baltica and Kryptoperidinium foliaceum Behzad Imanian., Jean-Franc¸ois Pombert., Patrick J. Keeling* Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Abstract Background: In one small group of dinoflagellates, photosynthesis is carried out by a tertiary endosymbiont derived from a diatom, giving rise to a complex cell that we collectively refer to as a ‘dinotom’. The endosymbiont is separated from its host by a single membrane and retains plastids, mitochondria, a large nucleus, and many other eukaryotic organelles and structures, a level of complexity suggesting an early stage of integration. Although the evolution of these endosymbionts has attracted considerable interest, the plastid genome has not been examined in detail, and indeed no tertiary plastid genome has yet been sequenced. Methodology/Principal Findings: Here we describe the complete plastid genomes of two closely related dinotoms, Durinskia baltica and Kryptoperidinium foliaceum. The D. baltica (116470 bp) and K. foliaceum (140426 bp) plastid genomes map as circular molecules featuring two large inverted repeats that separate distinct single copy regions. The organization and gene content of the D. baltica plastid closely resemble those of the pennate diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. The K. foliaceum plastid genome is much larger, has undergone more reorganization, and encodes a putative tyrosine recombinase (tyrC) also found in the plastid genome of the heterokont Heterosigma akashiwo, and two putative serine recombinases (serC1 and serC2) homologous to recombinases encoded by plasmids pCf1 and pCf2 in another pennate diatom, Cylindrotheca fusiformis. The K. foliaceum plastid genome also contains an additional copy of serC1, two degenerate copies of another plasmid-encoded ORF, and two non-coding regions whose sequences closely resemble portions of the pCf1 and pCf2 plasmids.
    [Show full text]
  • Glenodinium Triquetrum Ehrenb. Is a Species Not of Heterocapsa F.Stein but of Kryptoperidinium Er.Lindem
    Phytotaxa 391 (2): 155–158 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/pt/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2019 Magnolia Press Correspondence ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.391.2.11 Glenodinium triquetrum Ehrenb. is a species not of Heterocapsa F.Stein but of Kryptoperidinium Er.Lindem. (Kryptoperidiniaceae, Peridiniales) MARC GOTTSCHLING1,*, URBAN TILLMANN2, MALTE ELBRÄCHTER3, WOLF-HENNING KUSBER4 & MONA HOPPENRATH5 1 Department Biologie, Systematische Botanik und Mykologie, GeoBio-Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Menzinger Str. 67, D – 80638 München, Germany 2 Alfred-Wegener-Institut, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung, Am Handelshafen 12, D – 27570 Bremerhaven, Germany 3 Alfred-Wegener-Institut, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung, Wattenmeerstation Sylt, Hafenstr. 43, D – 25992 List/ Sylt, Germany 4 Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise-Straße 6-8, D – 14195 Berlin, Germany 5 Senckenberg am Meer, German Centre for Marine Biodiversity Research (DZMB), Südstrand 44, D – 26382 Wilhelmshaven, Germany * corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Introduction The dinophyte names Heterocapsa F.Stein and Kryptoperidinium Er.Lindem. are linked in a unfortunate way: The type of Heterocapsa, namely the well-established Heterocapsa triquetra (Ehrenb.) F.Stein, is demonstrably an element of Kryptoperidinium in its current circumscription (Gottschling et al. 2018b). This was uncovered 130 years after the combination from Glenodinium Ehrenb. to Heterocapsa was made (Stein 1883: 13), and we aim at overcoming the severe nomenclatural and taxonomical consequences (Gottschling et al. 2018b) by the proposal to conserve the type of Heterocapsa (Gottschling et al. 2018a) with Heterocapsa steinii Tillmann, Gottschling, Hoppenrath, Kusber & Elbr.
    [Show full text]