DOCSLIB.ORG

Microzooplankton Composition and Dynamics in Lake Erie

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Microzooplankton Composition and Dynamics in Lake Erie MICROZOOPLANKTON COMPOSITION AND DYNAMICS IN LAKE ERIE A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty of the University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Kenneth M. Moats May 2006 MICROZOOPLANKTON COMPOSITION AND DYNAMICS IN LAKE ERIE Kenneth M. Moats Thesis Approved: Accepted: ______________________________ ______________________________ Advisor Department Chair Peter J. Lavrentyev Richard L. Londraville ______________________________ ______________________________ Committee Member Dean of the College R. Joel Duff Ronald F. Levant ______________________________ ______________________________ Committee Member Dean of the Graduate School David M. Klarer George R. Newkome ______________________________ Date ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my graduate advisor Dr. Peter Lavrentyev for introducing me to the study of aquatic microbial ecology and for the opportunity to conduct this study. The importance of his guidance and expertise in every aspect of this research cannot be understated. I would also like to thank him for the patience, support, and encouragement he provided throughout my tenure. I would also like to thank the other members of my advisory committee, Dr. Joel Duff and Dr. David Klarer, for the helpful advice and comments offered during the preparation of this manuscript. I would like to extend my thanks to Dr. Klarer and the staff of Old Woman Creek NERR for logistical support and the sharing of unpublished data on Old Woman Creek. I thank Dr. Frank Jochem of Florida International University, Dr. Henry Vanderploeg and Dr. Stuart Ludsin of Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, and the Captain and crew of the US EPA R/V Lake Guardian for logistical support during the Lake Erie experiments. Special thanks to Dr. Francisco Moore for logistical support throughout this study and the National Science Foundation and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for financial support. Finally, I would like to thank my wife and family for the encouragement and support they provided throughout this endeavor. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES….…………………………………………………………………….vi LIST OF FIGURES……………………………………………………………………...vii CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................1 II. MATERIALS AND METHODS...................................................................................9 The Study Sites ........................................................................................................... 9 Estuarine Sites………………………………………………………………….9 Offshore Lake Erie Sites……………………………………………………...11 Herbivory Experiments..............................................................................................12 Sample Analysis.........................................................................................................14 Chlorophyll a Analysis………………………………………………………14 Microscopic Analysis........................................................................................15 Phytoplankton Enumeration via Flow-Cytometry............................................16 Phytoplankton Growth and Grazing Mortality .................................................17 III. RESULTS ..................................................................................................................21 Water Temperature...................................................................................................21 Chlorophyll a ...........................................................................................................21 Microzooplankton....................................................................................................22 iv Phytoplankton Growth and Grazing Mortality .................................................................25 Microzooplankton Growth and Production .............................................................26 IV. DISCUSSION............................................................................................................55 Conclusions...............................................................................................................61 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................62 v LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1 Experimental sites .....................................................................................30 2 Site data…………………………………………………..........................31 3 Distribution of ciliate taxa across estuarine sites……...............................32 4 Distribution of ciliate taxa across offshore sites........................................33 5 Distribution of dinoflagellate and rotifer taxa across estuarine sites….....34 6 Distribution of dinoflagellate and rotifer taxa across offshore sites..........35 7 Microzooplankton biomass........................................................................36 8 Biomass to chlorophyll a ratios…………………….................................40 9 Phytoplankton community growth and mortalilty rates.............................44 10 Phytoplankton growth and mortality rates in size fractions……………...45 11 Phytoplankton mortality rates in dark incubations………………………46 12 Phytoplankton growth and mortality rats based on flow-cytometry…..…47 13 Microzooplankton growth and secondary production……………...……48 14 Average production contribution by microzooplankton groups……...….52 15 Taxon-specific contribution to microzooplankton secondary production………………………………………………………………..53 16 Microzooplankton grazing impact……………………………………….54 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1 Sampling locations in Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve.......................................................................................19 2 Sampling locations in Lake Erie……………………………………........20 3 Microzooplankton community biomass.....................................................37 4 Relative microzooplankton biomass contribution……………………….38 5 Average total microzooplankton biomass contribution………………….39 6 Total microzooplankton biomass vs. Chl regression for all experimental sites…………………………………………………….…..41 7 Total microzooplankton biomass vs. Chl regression for estuarine experimental sites………………………………………………………...42 8 Total microzooplankton biomass vs. Chl regression for offshore experimental sites………………………………………………………...43 9 Microzooplankton growth vs. phytoplankton mortality dynamic……......49 10 Phytoplankton growth vs. microzooplankton growth dynamics……...….50 11 Phytoplankton growth vs. phytoplankton mortality dynamics….……….51 vii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION The pelagic microbial food web The Microbial Food Web (MFW) is a complex and dynamic assemblage of planktonic microorganisms including viruses, heterotrophic and photosynthetic bacteria and protists, and micrometazoa (Pomeroy 1974; Azam et al. 1983; Sherr and Sherr 2001). The MFW has been recognized as the dominant creator and processor of primary production in both marine (Sherr and Sherr 2001) and freshwater systems (Fahnenstiel et al. 1998). Constituents of the MFW range in size from 0.02 µm to 200 µm. This range is further divided into size fractions in an effort to describe trophic interactions, although this is not always accurate due to the ability of certain microbial grazers (e.g. dinoflagellates) to ingest prey of similar or greater size (Hansen and Calado 1999). In general terms, the picoplankton (0.2-2µm) size fraction consist mainly of heterotrophic bacteria and autotrophic cyanobacteria (i.e. Synechococcus), although some eukaryotes also fall into this category. The nanoplankton (2-20µm) includes auto- and heterotrophic flagellated protists, smaller diatoms, and some ciliates, whereas diatoms, dinoflagellates, ciliates, and colonial cyanobacteria are major components of the microplankton (20-200µm) size fraction. 1 Plankton are typically assigned the following trophic roles: phytoplankton (algae and cyanobacteria) are primary producers, utilizing photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) to drive CO2 fixation. Heterotrophic bacteria, and grazers are secondary producers due to their dependence on organic material as an energy source. Portions of primary and secondary production are utilized by primary consumers mainly of which are nano-sized flagellates and small ciliates. These grazers are then consumed by microzooplankton- sized ciliates, dinoflagellates, and sarcodines (e.g. heliozoans). Microplankton form a direct trophic link to crustacean mesozooplankton, other planktonic invertebrates, and fish larvae (Stoecker and Capuzzo 1990) as well as benthic invertebrates (e.g. the zebra mussel, Lavrentyev et al. 1995). However, this generalized concept is often difficult to apply within the MFW due to wide spread mixotrophy (i.e. the ability to combine or switch between heterotrophic and autotrophic modes of nutrition, Turner and Roff 1993). In many situations, the MFW includes complex trophic cascades, which have significant effects on the energy transfer through pelagic ecosystems and nutrient cycling rates (Legendre and Rassoulzadegan 1995, Lavrentyev et al. 1997). In freshwater systems, rotifers can act as an additional trophic level within the MFW by feeding on algae, ciliates and other protists (McCormick and Cairns 1991; Weisse and Frahm 2002). These invertebrates (Phylum Rotifera) range in size from 60 µm to 2500 µm and are capable of herbivory, bacterivory, as well as predation on autotrophic and heterotrophic protists (Gilbert
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Molecular Data and the Evolutionary History of Dinoflagellates by Juan Fernando Saldarriaga Echavarria Diplom, Ruprecht-Karls-Un
    Molecular data and the evolutionary history of dinoflagellates by Juan Fernando Saldarriaga Echavarria Diplom, Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg, 1993 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES Department of Botany We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA November 2003 © Juan Fernando Saldarriaga Echavarria, 2003 ABSTRACT New sequences of ribosomal and protein genes were combined with available morphological and paleontological data to produce a phylogenetic framework for dinoflagellates. The evolutionary history of some of the major morphological features of the group was then investigated in the light of that framework. Phylogenetic trees of dinoflagellates based on the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene (SSU) are generally poorly resolved but include many well- supported clades, and while combined analyses of SSU and LSU (large subunit ribosomal RNA) improve the support for several nodes, they are still generally unsatisfactory. Protein-gene based trees lack the degree of species representation necessary for meaningful in-group phylogenetic analyses, but do provide important insights to the phylogenetic position of dinoflagellates as a whole and on the identity of their close relatives. Molecular data agree with paleontology in suggesting an early evolutionary radiation of the group, but whereas paleontological data include only taxa with fossilizable cysts, the new data examined here establish that this radiation event included all dinokaryotic lineages, including athecate forms. Plastids were lost and replaced many times in dinoflagellates, a situation entirely unique for this group. Histones could well have been lost earlier in the lineage than previously assumed.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Engineering, Inc. Advancing the Science of Assessment, Management and Rehabilitation of Our Aquatic Natural Resources!
    Aquatic Engineering, Inc. Advancing the Science of Assessment, Management and Rehabilitation of our Aquatic Natural Resources! 2004 Bone Lake Water Quality Technical Report Prepared by: Aquatic Engineering Post Office Box 3634 La Crosse, WI 54602-3634 Phone: 608-781-8770 Fax: 608-781-8771 E-mail: [email protected] Web Site: www.aquaticengineering.org 2004 Bone Lake Water Quality Technical Report February 2005 1 2 By N. D. Strasser , and J. E. Britton In cooperation with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources and the Polk County Land and Water Resources Department 1 Aquatic Engineering, Inc.; [email protected] PO Box 3634, La Crosse, WI 54602-3634 Phone: 608-781-8770 www.aquaticengineering.org 2 The Limnological Institute; [email protected] PO Box 304, La Crosse, WI 54602-0304 Phone: 800-485-1772; www.thelimnologicalinstitute.org Acknowledgements The 2004 Bone Lake Water Quality Monitoring Technical Report was completed with the assistance of the Bone Lake Management District and through a Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) Lake Planning Grant (#LPL-947-04) which provided funding for 75% of the monitoring costs. A special thanks to the following individuals for their help throughout the project: Bone Lake Management District Commissioners Robert Murphy Chairman Tim Laughlin Vice Chairman Dale Vlasnik Treasurer Mary Delougherty Secretary Brian Masters Commissioner Dick Boss Commissioner Bill Jungbauer Commissioner Mark Lendway Commissioner Wayne Shirley Town of Bone Lake Commissioner Ralph Johansen Polk County Commissioner Ron Ogren Georgetown Commissioner Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Danny Ryan Lake Coordinator Jane Malishke Environmental Grants Specialist Heath Benike Fish Biologist Polk County Land and Water Resources Jeremy Williamson Water Quality Specialist Amy Kelsey Information and Education Coordinator i Executive Summary Bone Lake is a 1,781-acre drainage lake located in Polk County, Wisconsin.
    [Show full text]
  • Protocols for Monitoring Harmful Algal Blooms for Sustainable Aquaculture and Coastal Fisheries in Chile (Supplement Data)
    Protocols for monitoring Harmful Algal Blooms for sustainable aquaculture and coastal fisheries in Chile (Supplement data) Provided by Kyoko Yarimizu, et al. Table S1. Phytoplankton Naming Dictionary: This dictionary was constructed from the species observed in Chilean coast water in the past combined with the IOC list. Each name was verified with the list provided by IFOP and online dictionaries, AlgaeBase (https://www.algaebase.org/) and WoRMS (http://www.marinespecies.org/). The list is subjected to be updated. Phylum Class Order Family Genus Species Ochrophyta Bacillariophyceae Achnanthales Achnanthaceae Achnanthes Achnanthes longipes Bacillariophyta Coscinodiscophyceae Coscinodiscales Heliopeltaceae Actinoptychus Actinoptychus spp. Dinoflagellata Dinophyceae Gymnodiniales Gymnodiniaceae Akashiwo Akashiwo sanguinea Dinoflagellata Dinophyceae Gymnodiniales Gymnodiniaceae Amphidinium Amphidinium spp. Ochrophyta Bacillariophyceae Naviculales Amphipleuraceae Amphiprora Amphiprora spp. Bacillariophyta Bacillariophyceae Thalassiophysales Catenulaceae Amphora Amphora spp. Cyanobacteria Cyanophyceae Nostocales Aphanizomenonaceae Anabaenopsis Anabaenopsis milleri Cyanobacteria Cyanophyceae Oscillatoriales Coleofasciculaceae Anagnostidinema Anagnostidinema amphibium Anagnostidinema Cyanobacteria Cyanophyceae Oscillatoriales Coleofasciculaceae Anagnostidinema lemmermannii Cyanobacteria Cyanophyceae Oscillatoriales Microcoleaceae Annamia Annamia toxica Cyanobacteria Cyanophyceae Nostocales Aphanizomenonaceae Aphanizomenon Aphanizomenon flos-aquae
    [Show full text]
  • Differentiating Two Closely Related Alexandrium Species Using Comparative Quantitative Proteomics
    toxins Article Differentiating Two Closely Related Alexandrium Species Using Comparative Quantitative Proteomics Bryan John J. Subong 1,2,* , Arturo O. Lluisma 1, Rhodora V. Azanza 1 and Lilibeth A. Salvador-Reyes 1,* 1 Marine Science Institute, University of the Philippines- Diliman, Velasquez Street, Quezon City 1101, Philippines; [email protected] (A.O.L.); [email protected] (R.V.A.) 2 Department of Chemistry, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo City, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan * Correspondence: [email protected] (B.J.J.S.); [email protected] (L.A.S.-R.) Abstract: Alexandrium minutum and Alexandrium tamutum are two closely related harmful algal bloom (HAB)-causing species with different toxicity. Using isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantita- tion (iTRAQ)-based quantitative proteomics and two-dimensional differential gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE), a comprehensive characterization of the proteomes of A. minutum and A. tamutum was performed to identify the cellular and molecular underpinnings for the dissimilarity between these two species. A total of 1436 proteins and 420 protein spots were identified using iTRAQ-based proteomics and 2D-DIGE, respectively. Both methods revealed little difference (10–12%) between the proteomes of A. minutum and A. tamutum, highlighting that these organisms follow similar cellular and biological processes at the exponential stage. Toxin biosynthetic enzymes were present in both organisms. However, the gonyautoxin-producing A. minutum showed higher levels of osmotic growth proteins, Zn-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase and type-I polyketide synthase compared to the non-toxic A. tamutum. Further, A. tamutum had increased S-adenosylmethionine transferase that may potentially have a negative feedback mechanism to toxin biosynthesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Life Magill’S Encyclopedia of Science
    MAGILLS ENCYCLOPEDIA OF SCIENCE PLANT LIFE MAGILLS ENCYCLOPEDIA OF SCIENCE PLANT LIFE Volume 4 Sustainable Forestry–Zygomycetes Indexes Editor Bryan D. Ness, Ph.D. Pacific Union College, Department of Biology Project Editor Christina J. Moose Salem Press, Inc. Pasadena, California Hackensack, New Jersey Editor in Chief: Dawn P. Dawson Managing Editor: Christina J. Moose Photograph Editor: Philip Bader Manuscript Editor: Elizabeth Ferry Slocum Production Editor: Joyce I. Buchea Assistant Editor: Andrea E. Miller Page Design and Graphics: James Hutson Research Supervisor: Jeffry Jensen Layout: William Zimmerman Acquisitions Editor: Mark Rehn Illustrator: Kimberly L. Dawson Kurnizki Copyright © 2003, by Salem Press, Inc. All rights in this book are reserved. No part of this work may be used or reproduced in any manner what- soever or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy,recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the copyright owner except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. For information address the publisher, Salem Press, Inc., P.O. Box 50062, Pasadena, California 91115. Some of the updated and revised essays in this work originally appeared in Magill’s Survey of Science: Life Science (1991), Magill’s Survey of Science: Life Science, Supplement (1998), Natural Resources (1998), Encyclopedia of Genetics (1999), Encyclopedia of Environmental Issues (2000), World Geography (2001), and Earth Science (2001). ∞ The paper used in these volumes conforms to the American National Standard for Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, Z39.48-1992 (R1997). Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Magill’s encyclopedia of science : plant life / edited by Bryan D.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Bioluminescence in Dinoflagellates—How Far Have We Come?
    Microorganisms 2013, 1, 3-25; doi:10.3390/microorganisms1010003 OPEN ACCESS microorganisms ISSN 2076-2607 www.mdpi.com/journal/microorganisms Review Understanding Bioluminescence in Dinoflagellates—How Far Have We Come? Martha Valiadi 1,* and Debora Iglesias-Rodriguez 2 1 Department of Evolutionary Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, August-Thienemann-Strasse, Plӧn 24306, Germany 2 Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected] or [email protected]; Tel.: +49-4522-763277; Fax: +49-4522-763310. Received: 3 May 2013; in revised form: 20 August 2013 / Accepted: 24 August 2013 / Published: 5 September 2013 Abstract: Some dinoflagellates possess the remarkable genetic, biochemical, and cellular machinery to produce bioluminescence. Bioluminescent species appear to be ubiquitous in surface waters globally and include numerous cosmopolitan and harmful taxa. Nevertheless, bioluminescence remains an enigmatic topic in biology, particularly with regard to the organisms’ lifestyle. In this paper, we review the literature on the cellular mechanisms, molecular evolution, diversity, and ecology of bioluminescence in dinoflagellates, highlighting significant discoveries of the last quarter of a century. We identify significant gaps in our knowledge and conflicting information and propose some important research questions
    [Show full text]
  • Removal of the Toxic Dinoflagellate Alexandrium Tamarense (Dinophyta
    Revista de Biología Marina y Oceanografía Vol. 50, Nº2: 347-352, agosto 2015 DOI 10.4067/S0718-19572015000300012 RESEARCH NOTE Removal of the toxic dinoflagellate Alexandrium tamarense (Dinophyta, Gonyaulacales) by Mnemiopsis leidyi (Ctenophora, Lobata) in controlled experimental conditions Remoción del dinoflagelado tóxico Alexandrium tamarense (Dinophyta, Gonyaulacales) por Mnemiopsis leidyi (Ctenophora, Lobata) en condiciones experimentales controladas Sergio Bolasina1,2, Hugo Benavides1,4, Nora Montoya1, José Carreto1,4, Marcelo Acha1,3,4 and Hermes Mianzan1,3,4 1Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero - INIDEP, Paseo Victoria Ocampo N°1, Escollera Norte, (7602), Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina. [email protected] 2Núcleo em Ecologia e Desenvolvimento Sócio-Ambiental de Macaé -NUPEM/UFRJ, Rua São José do Barreto 764, Macaé, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. (Present address) 3Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina 4Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Funes 3350 (7600) Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina Abstract.- The objective of the present study is to estimate the removal capability of the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi (Ctenophora, Lobata) on cultures of the toxic dinoflagellate Alexandrium tamarense (Dinophyta, Gonyaulacales). For this purpose, observations on its clearance and survival rates were made in controlled experiments, using different A. tamarense cell concentrations. Mnemiopsis leidyi is able to remove dinoflagellates actively from the water column only at the lowest density tested (150 cells mL-1). Animals exposed to 300 cells mL-1 presented negative clearance and removal rates (survival= 67%). All ctenophores exposed at the highest concentrations of toxic dinoflagellates (600 cells mL-1) died after 4 h. Removal may occur mainly by incorporating and entangling cells in the mucus strands formed by the ctenophore, and in a lesser way by ingestion.
    [Show full text]
  • Rotifera: Monogononta)
    Anim. Syst. Evol. Divers. Vol. 36, No. 3: 222-227, July 2020 https://doi.org/10.5635/ASED.2020.36.3.046 Review article New Record of Kellicottia bostoniensis and Redescription of Two Freshwater Rotifers from Korea (Rotifera: Monogononta) Hee-Min Yang, Gi-Sik Min* Department of Biological Sciences, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea ABSTRACT In this study, we identified three monogonont rotifers from South Korea: Kellicottia bostoniensis (Rousselet, 1908), Trichocerca tenuior (Gosse, 1886), and Lepadella triptera (Ehrenberg, 1830). The distribution records of K. bostoniensis were mainly located in the Nearctic, Neotropic and Western Palearctic regions. After Japan, this is the second record of it in Asia. Trichocerca tenuior and Lepadella triptera have already been recorded in Korea, but the data of two species were insufficient in previous study. Here, we describe the morphological characteristics of the three species and the trophi structures of K. bostoniensis and T. tenuior. This study is the first to characterize the trophi structure of K. bostoniensis, observed using a scanning electron microscope. In addition, we have determined the partial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI) and 18S rRNA gene sequences of T. tenuior and L. triptera for their DNA barcodes. Keywords: ‌biodiversity, East Asia, monogonont rotifers, SEM, taxonomy INTRODUCTION 1999). The genus Trichocerca Lamarck, 1801 is a species-rich Research on rotifers in Korea was started by Hada (1936), who taxon in the monogonont rotifers. It comprises 77 species collected 17 species from Lake Seo-ho in Suwon-si, Gyeong- and inhabits various environments such as fresh, brack- gi-do, South Korea. So far, 305 species have been recorded in ish, and marine water (Segers, 2007; Jersabek and Leitner, Korea (National Institute of Biological Resources and Minis- 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • On the Serotonergic Nervous System of Two Planktonic Rotifers, Conochilus Coenobasis and C
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Zoologischer Anzeiger 245 (2006) 53–62 www.elsevier.de/jcz On the serotonergic nervous system of two planktonic rotifers, Conochilus coenobasis and C. dossuarius (Monogononta, Flosculariacea, Conochilidae) Rick Hochbergà Department of Biological Sciences, University of Massachusetts, One University Avenue, Lowell, MA 01854, USA Received 21 November 2005; received in revised form 4 April 2006; accepted 10 April 2006 Corresponding editor: M. Schmitt Abstract The serotonergic nervous systems of two non-colonial species of Conochilus were examined to obtain the first immunohistochemical insights into the neuroanatomy of species of Flosculariacea (Rotifera, Monogononta). Species of Conochilus, subgenus Conochiloides, were examined using serotonin (5-HT) immunohistochemistry, epifluorescence and confocal laser scanning microscopy, and 3D computer imaging software. In specimens of C. coenobasis and C. dossuarius, the serotonergic nervous system is defined by a dorsal cerebral ganglion, apically directed cerebral neurites, and paired nerve cords. The cerebral ganglion contains approximately four pairs of small 5-HT- immunoreactive perikarya; one pair innervates the posterior nerve cords and three pairs innervate the apical field. The most dorsal pair innervates a coronal nerve ring that encircles the apical field. Within the apical field is a second nerve ring that outlines the inner border of the coronal cilia. Together, both the inner and outer nerve rings may function to modulate ciliary activity of the corona. The other two pairs of perikarya innervate a region around the mouth. Specific differences in the distribution of serotonergic neurons between species of Conochilus and previously examined ploimate rotifers include the following: (a) a lack of immunoreactivity in the mastax; (b) a greater number of apically directed serotonergic neurites; and (c) a complete innervation of the corona in both species of Conochilus.
    [Show full text]
  • Rotifer Species Diversity in Mexico: an Updated Checklist
    diversity Review Rotifer Species Diversity in Mexico: An Updated Checklist S. S. S. Sarma 1,* , Marco Antonio Jiménez-Santos 2 and S. Nandini 1 1 Laboratory of Aquatic Zoology, FES Iztacala, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Av. de Los Barrios No. 1, Tlalnepantla 54090, Mexico; [email protected] 2 Posgrado en Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Mexico City 04510, Mexico; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +52-55-56231256 Abstract: A review of the Mexican rotifer species diversity is presented here. To date, 402 species of rotifers have been recorded from Mexico, besides a few infraspecific taxa such as subspecies and varieties. The rotifers from Mexico represent 27 families and 75 genera. Molecular analysis showed about 20 cryptic taxa from species complexes. The genera Lecane, Trichocerca, Brachionus, Lepadella, Cephalodella, Keratella, Ptygura, and Notommata accounted for more than 50% of all species recorded from the Mexican territory. The diversity of rotifers from the different states of Mexico was highly heterogeneous. Only five federal entities (the State of Mexico, Michoacán, Veracruz, Mexico City, Aguascalientes, and Quintana Roo) had more than 100 species. Extrapolation of rotifer species recorded from Mexico indicated the possible occurrence of more than 600 species in Mexican water bodies, hence more sampling effort is needed. In the current review, we also comment on the importance of seasonal sampling in enhancing the species richness and detecting exotic rotifer taxa in Mexico. Keywords: rotifera; distribution; checklist; taxonomy Citation: Sarma, S.S.S.; Jiménez-Santos, M.A.; Nandini, S. Rotifer Species Diversity in Mexico: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biodiverse Rotifer Assemblages (Rotifera: Eurotatoria) of Arunachal Pradesh, the Eastern Himalayas: Alpha Diversity, Distribution and Interesting Features
    Bonn zoological Bulletin 68 (1): 1–12 ISSN 2190–7307 2019 · Sharma B.K. & Sharma S. http://www.zoologicalbulletin.de https://doi.org/10.20363/BZB-2019.68.1.001 Research article urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:839E82AA-0807-47C1-B21E-C5DE2098C146 The biodiverse rotifer assemblages (Rotifera: Eurotatoria) of Arunachal Pradesh, the eastern Himalayas: alpha diversity, distribution and interesting features Bhushan Kumar Sharma1, * & Sumita Sharma2 1, 2 Department of Zoology, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong – 793 022, Meghalaya, India * Corresponding author: Email: [email protected] 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:FD069583-6E71-46D6-8F45-90A87F35BEFE 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:668E0FE0-C474-4D0D-9339-F01ADFD239D1 Abstract. The present assessment of Rotifera biodiversity of the eastern Himalayas reveals a total of 172 species belonging to 39 genera and 19 families from Arunachal Pradesh, the northeastern-most state of India. The richness forms ~59% and ~40% of the rotifer species known till date from northeast India (NEI) and India, respectively. Three species are new to the Indian sub-region, four species are new to NEI and 89 species are new to Arunachal Pradesh; 27 species indicate global distribution importance and 25 species reported exclusively from NEI merit regional interest. The rich and diverse alpha di- versity and biogeographic interest of Rotifera of this Himalayan biodiversity hot-spot is noteworthy in light of predominance of the small lentic ecosystems. Lecanidae > Brachionidae > Lepadellidae > Trichocercidae collectively comprise ~71% of total rotifer species. Brachionidae records the highest richness known from any state of India. This study indicates the role of thermophiles with overall importance of ‘tropic-centered’ genera Lecane and Brachionus, and particularly at lower altitudes; species of ‘temperate-centered’ genera Keratella, Notholca and Synchaeta are notable in our collections at middle and higher altitudes, while Trichocerca and Lepadella are other species-rich genera.
    [Show full text]
  • A Data Set on the Distribution of Rotifera in Antarctica
    Biogeographia – The Journal of Integrative Biogeography 35 (2020): 17-25 https://doi.org/10.21426/B635044786 A data set on the distribution of Rotifera in Antarctica GIUSEPPE GARLASCHÈ1, KARIMULLAH KARIMULLAH1,2, NATALIIA IAKOVENKO3,4,5, ALEJANDRO VELASCO-CASTRILLÓN6, KAREL JANKO4,5, ROBERTO GUIDETTI7, LORENA REBECCHI7, MATTEO CECCHETTO8,9, STEFANO SCHIAPARELLI8,9, CHRISTIAN D. JERSABEK10, WILLEM H. DE SMET11, DIEGO FONTANETO1,* 1 National Research Council of Italy, Water Research Institute (CNR-IRSA), Verbania Pallanza (Italy) 2 University of Leipzig, Faculty of Life Science, Institute of Biology, Behavioral Ecology Research Group, Leipzig (Germany) 3 University of Life Sciences in Prague, Praha-Suchdol (Czech Republic) 4 Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, University of Ostrava, Ostrava (Czech Republic) 5 Laboratory of Fish Genetics, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics AS CR, Liběchov (Czech Republic) 6 South Australian Museum, Adelaide, (Australia) 7 Department of Life Science, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena (Italy) 8 Department of Earth, Environmental and Life Science (DISTAV), University of Genoa, Genoa (Italy) 9 Italian National Antarctic Museum (MNA, Section of Genoa), University of Genoa, Genoa (Italy) 10 Division of Animal Structure and Function, University of Salzburg, Salzburg (Austria) 11 Department of Biology, ECOBE, University of Antwerp Campus Drie Eiken, Wilrijk (Belgium) * email corresponding author: [email protected] Keywords: ANTABIF, Antarctica, Bdelloidea, biodiversity, biogeography, GBIF, Monogononta, rotifers. SUMMARY We present a data set on Antarctic biodiversity for the phylum Rotifera, making it publicly available through the Antarctic Biodiversity Information facility. We provide taxonomic information, geographic distribution, location, and habitat for each record. The data set gathers all the published literature about rotifers found and identified across the Continental, Maritime, and Subantarctic biogeographic regions of Antarctica.
    [Show full text]