DOCSLIB.ORG

Comparative Research on Industrial Parks and Special Economic Zones

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Comparative Research on Industrial Parks and Special Economic Zones November 2018 Belarus: Comparative Research on Industrial Parks and Special Economic Zones Prepared by Dzmitry Kolkin for the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development Table of contents Acknowledgements 2 Executive summary 3 Chapter 1: Introduction 7 Chapter 2: Regulatory framework and performance of FEZs in Belarus 12 Chapter 3: Regulatory framework and performance of the High-Tech Park 37 Chapter 4: Regulatory framework and development of the Great Stone 47 Industrial Park Appendix 1: Architecture of official collaboration between Belarus and China 58 Appendix 2: Comparison of incentives of economic regimes 59 Appendix 3: Structure of management of FEZs 63 Appendix 4: Brief information on integration of the HTP in the local economy 64 Appendix 5: Comparison of some economic indicators taken per employee 65 of respective regime Appendix 6: The Great Stone Industrial Park collaboration structure 67 Appendix 7: List of residents of the Great Stone Industrial Park 68 References 71 1 Acknowledgements This report is part of a project studying the This report benefits greatly from the guidance of establishment of Chinese development zones counterparts from China’s Center for International and industrial parks in countries of the Belt and Knowledge on Development (CIKD), including Road Initiative. This joint research collaboration Mr Sen Gong, Ms Xiheng Jiang, Mr Taidong Zhou includes China’s Center for International Knowledge and Ms Yu Zhou. It also benefited from the open on Development (CIKD), the European Bank for and frank exchanges and comments from the Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), the World independent research community of Belarus during Bank, the United Nations Industrial Development roundtable discussions. In particular, the author is Organization (UNIDO), and other relevant partners. grateful to Dzmitry Kruk (BEROC), Serge Naurodski (CASE Belarus), Dzmitry Markusheuski (SYMPA) and This report represents a part of this work and was Alexander Chubrik (IPM Research Center) for the prepared by independent consultant, Dzmitry Kolkin. very helpful exchanges of ideas, deep insights and A significant contribution as well as important open discussions. editorial work and coordination efforts were made by Ms Xinxing Li (EBRD Principal Adviser to Managing Moreover, the report also received invaluable Director and the operational leader of the project). support and reviews from various colleagues in the Mr Alexander Pivovarsky (Head of the EBRD Belarus Economics, Policy and Governance department; Resident Office and the team leader of the project) the Office of the Chief Economist team; along with has provided endless support and advice. All this work the Communications department at the EBRD. was initiated and the team was inspired and guided by They include Ms Anna Engstrom, Mr Peter Sanfey, Dr Mattia Romani, Managing Director for Economics, Mr Martin Pospisil, Ms Rika Ishii, Ms Idil Bilgic- Policy and Governance at the EBRD. Alpaslan, Mr Gabriele Liotta, Mr Cagatay Bircan and Ms Natasha Treloar. This work would not be possible without the proactive role of Mr Nikolai Snopkov (Deputy Head of the In addition, the report benefited greatly from Presidential Administration of the Republic of Belarus) interviews and discussions at various formal in developing Belarus-Chinese cooperation, and the and informal meetings and seminars with the efforts he put into the creation and development of representatives of various government agencies and the Great Stone Industrial Park. The author thanks local authorities. Mr Alexander Yaroshenko, Head of the Great Stone Industrial Park Administration, for his cooperation and support at all stages of the preparation of this report. The efforts of Mr Kirill Koroteev and Mr Sergei Vaitekhovski, First Deputy Head and Deputy Head of Industrial Park Development Company respectively, helped to make the report meaningful and depict the state of play. The author also thanks Deputy Minister of Economy of the Republic of Belarus Mr Alexander Chervyakov and the Head of the Department of Investment Policy of the Ministry of Economy Ms Elena Perminova, for their useful suggestions and support. The author is particularly grateful to Ms Olga Bondar and Ms Marina Grichik, Head of the Division of Infrastructure Development and Head of the Division of Macroeconomic Policy of the Ministry of Economy of the Republic of Belarus, respectively, for timely statistical support and in-depth discussions. 2 Executive summary Belarus has accumulated experience in the design However, the FEZs and HTP are relatively poor in and implementation of economic incentives to terms of some social indicators. The average salary promote business development, exports and foreign in the FEZs is almost equal to that of the rest of the direct investment (FDI) inflows in the country. The economy, although the residents generally have creation of free economic zones (FEZs) and the High- higher competitiveness than their peers outside the Tech Park (HTP) were effective policy instruments in zones. Contrary to expectations, the HTP also has a the late 1990s and 2000s. lower value of per employee revenue in comparison to the FEZs and the rest of the economy. The Great Stone Industrial Park (GSIP) is the latest example of the state’s economic policy to boost Special economic zones in Belarus are also limited investments and exports, based on previous by the sectoral development. The HTP, for instance, Belarusian experience and Chinese development has a clear focus on the development of the ICT experience on the Suzhou Industrial Park (SIP). industry. This policy, on the one hand, sets boundaries It is also a new form of cooperation between the for its residents to be in the ICT-related business. Belarusian and Chinese governments. The project is On the other hand, it limits other high technological of high importance for both countries since it is part of companies from residing in the park. However, the the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). latest changes in local legislation will allow more freedom in this area for HTP. The FEZ residents, The study focuses on three issues. First, the paper however, were not limited by particular sectors, but it analyses the Belarusian experience in the creation did not lead to the creation of new economic sectors. of special economic zones. Second, we look at how the GSIP has been developing so far and what Lastly, special economic zones have different levels lessons have been learned from the past experience. of integration with the domestic economy. The FEZ Lastly, this paper makes policy recommendations on residents increase their sales in the local market. how to increase the efficiency of the Belarus-China This suggests that these zones play a substantial role cooperation under the GSIP project. locally. However, the HTP has a low level of integration with the local economy. Compared with the performance of the national economy, the FEZs and the HTP show a better Both FEZs and the HTP have disadvantages due to record of economic development. They contributed the extraterritoriality approach. For example, in FEZs, significantly to the country’s net FDI inflows and inorganic growth allowed for the inclusion of big state- played a crucial role in exports formation. owned enterprises as residents no matter where they physically resided. Moreover, the rules of the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU) require that the benefits for residents allowed in the free economic zones are almost identical across the Union. This made them less attractive in comparison with the HTP or the GSIP. 3 The Belarusian government has been refining its d. In addition, the Park residents enjoy the most policy approaches for the GSIP to develop the Park favourable fiscal and economic conditions in based on our assessment of the performance of the country, in line with the EEU legislation. As the FEZs and HTP, the revealed advantages and a “territorial special economic zone”, the Park disadvantages policy-wise, and what we have learned enjoys more customs and tax benefits than from the Chinese SIP. Clear evidence can be found “regular” special economic (free) zones; that is, from the evolution of the legislation governing the its residents benefit from duty-free imports of GSIP. A few examples from the recent Decree number equipment and raw materials; in fact, duty-free 166, which was the first Presidential decree that has imports are a significant competitive advantage been the result of consultations with experts including of the GSIP given that EEU legislation has limited private sector participants from a foreign country, are quotas for member countries on such zones. highlighted below: 2. A number of challenges were identified in the 1. There are a number of special policy experiments course of the development of the Park. that have been granted to the GSIP for the first time. a. Access to finance is viewed as a constraint for the GSIP residents due to the combination of a a. The government introduced an option that permits lack of long-term funding, high interest rates and foreigners to own land within the territory of the stringent collateral requirements demanded by GSIP. Both foreign and local residents are eligible local legislation. To solve this, the Belarusian to purchase land plots for business purposes. and Chinese governments set up two financial instruments to support business projects in b. The government also offers additional visa-free the park. However, there is still no experience entry to the country for staff and their families accumulated to be confident of their effectiveness. working in the GSIP. b. There are risks associated with Belarus being c. The GSIP is managed by the Park’s administration part of the Customs Union. In particular, we refer and the development company, which can help to unstable and inconsistent relationships with to avoid a conflict of interest. The former deals Russia, a major market for Belarusian companies. with common matters of the Park’s management Non-trade barriers under the EEU can potentially and rendering of relevant services to the Park discourage Belarusian products and services residents in terms of projects review and approval, being sold in the Russian market.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PAP-10-GB.Pdf
    !"#$%&'()*')' +&&$*'* , ! ! "- ! . / ! , 0 1%- ! " " %12*3- , 4" 5 4 )*)* " - ! . / ! , 0 Boris Zalessky Growth points Features of development in the face of global challenges 1 2 Table of contents Sustainable development goals and media ................................................................................. 5 Global information security and regional press ........................................................................ 12 From strategy to attract foreign investment to international cooperation ................................ 20 Honorary Consuls Institute: project-specific orientation.......................................................... 28 Export culture and mass consciousness .................................................................................... 31 Exports to distant arc countries as an important factor for development ................................. 34 Food exports: growth trends ..................................................................................................... 37 Export of services: among priorities - tourism ......................................................................... 40 Import substitution: growth reserves - in modernization.......................................................... 43 From green economy to green cities........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Investment and Trade Policy of the Republic of Belarus
    INVESTMENT AND TRADE POLICY OF THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS Igor Ugorich Head of Department, Foreign Trade Administration, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Belarus Globalisation creates a situation where the conflicts in certain regions directly affect the global state of affairs. From this perspective, developments in the 21st Century will be largely influenced by processes taking shape in the whole world. Multi-ethnic and multi-confessional Belarus has avoided the religious and ethnic conflicts so characteristic of many post-Soviet countries. Organised government management and law-enforcement systems have allowed us to ensure an adequate level of security for our society and people. The strategy of economic development, priorities and the stages of reformation of the economy of Belarus are based on the so-called “Belarusan model” of development, which is a socially orientated market economy stipulated by the Constitution and with regard to the place and the role of our state in the world community. Reformation of the Belarusan economy started in 1991 after the dissolution of the USSR. The current stage of reformation and development started in 1994-1995 and is connected with cardinal changes in the economic policy of the state carried out before. Belarus looked for its own way of development in the years of crisis, one based on a sound pragmatic and practical understanding of world experience, taking into account particular internal problems and the general situation in the world. How should one build a programme of economic development? To ensure financial stabilisation at the cost of a drastic tightening of monetary and credit policy which would limit purchasing power (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Industry of Belarus in 2016
    2016 Minerals Yearbook BELARUS [ADVANCE RELEASE] U.S. Department of the Interior February 2020 U.S. Geological Survey The Mineral Industry of Belarus By Elena Safirova Belarus’s mineral production enterprises included a potash The total value of foreign direct investment (FDI) in Belarus’s mining company, three metallurgical steel plants, a nitrogen economy in 2016 was $6.9 billion, which was a 4.3% decrease production enterprise, and two crude petroleum refineries. compared with the FDI in 2015. The mineral sector received Belarus was the third-ranked country among the world’s potash only 2.3% of the total foreign investment. Russia provided producers following Canada and Russia (Jasinski, 2018). 51.5% of the total FDI and was the main source of foreign The country’s only mineral production enterprise that played investment in 2016 (National Statistical Committee of the a major role in world markets was its potash mining firm Republic of Belarus, 2017, p. 423–438). OAO Belaruskali. Belarus does not have significant resources In 2016, Belarus exported $23.5 billion worth of goods, which of mineral fuels within its territory; however, its energy was an 11.7% decrease compared with the total export revenue infrastructure includes an extensive network of oil pipelines in 2015. Belarus also imported $27.6 billion worth of goods, and gas pipelines, which position the country as an important which was an 8.9% decrease compared with the value of imports participant in the transportation of oil and natural gas to in 2015. In 2016, Belarus exported 13.0 Mt of refined petroleum Europe from Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • 171101 Final PRODOC Autom
    UNITED NATIONS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION Project of the Republic of Belarus Project number: ID 170165 Project title: Institutional strengthening and policy support to upgrade the component manufacturers in the automotive sector in the Republic of Belarus Project phase Phase II Thematic area code GC2 Advancing Economic Competitiveness Starting date: Phase I: 2014–2017 Phase II: 2017–2019 Duration: Phase I: 30 months Phase II: 15 months Project site: Republic of Belarus Government Coordinating agency: National Academy of Sciences of Belarus Main counterpart: Ministry of Economy and Ministry of Industry of the Republic of Belarus Executing agency: UNIDO Donor: Russian Federation Project Inputs Phase I: - Project costs: USD 880,530 - Support costs 13%: USD 114,470 - Total project costs: USD 995,000 Project Inputs Phase II: - Project costs: USD 398,230 - Support costs 13%: USD 51,770 - Total project costs: USD 450,000 (the Russian voluntary contribution to UNIDO IDF) Brief description: The overall objective of the project is to assist the automotive component suppliers in the Republic of Belarus to meet the requirements of Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) and the first-tier automotive component manufacturers. More specifically, the project foresees: Enhancing the performance of participating suppliers in the automotive component industry in the Republic of Belarus to ensure their international competitiveness through enterprises oriented direct shop floor interventions, at a first step on a pilot-bases, and finally through selected business support and advisory institutions. Upgrading the relevant support institutions through strengthening institutional set-up, optimization of the service portfolio and development of a base of well-trained national engineers.
    [Show full text]
  • Belt and Road Initiative: the Role of Belarus
    20 April 2018 Belt and Road Initiative: The Role of Belarus Belarus, a landlocked nation in Eastern Europe bordering Russia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Ukraine, has caught rising interest among Hong Kong’s business community in recent years under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Going hand in hand with its role as a transport gateway linking China with the EU and CIS countries, it is seen as an increasingly open investment destination for manufacturing and high-tech developments. An Important Transport Node on the Silk Road Economic Belt Strategically located on the new Eurasia land bridge, eight rail container routes on the China-Western Europe trade pass through Belarus, enabling cargo to move much faster between China and Germany via Kazakhstan, Russia, Belarus and Poland, taking about 17 days. In comparison, sea freight takes around three weeks longer, although the freight cost of travelling by rail is about 60-70% higher. As shippers have become more receptive to the expanding rail container routes, more than 3,000 Sino-European trains used Belarus’s rail network in 2017. Belarus is a bridge between Europe (CIS and EU) and Asia. Source: Great Stone Industrial Park Two pan-European Corridors – II (Berlin-Moscow) and IX (Helsinki-Greece) – pass through Belarus, strengthening its position as a main trade and transport thoroughfare in the region. Standing at the border between Belarus and Poland is the Kozlovichi-Kukuryki checkpoint – one of the busiest cargo truck checkpoints between the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) and the European Union (EU). 1 Belt and Road Initiative: The Role of Belarus The Kozlovichi-Kukuryki checkpoint at the Belarusian-Polish border is one of the busiest cargo checkpoints between CIS and the EU.
    [Show full text]
  • Review–Chronicle
    REVIEWCHRONICLE of the human rights violations in Belarus in 2005 Human Rights Center Viasna ReviewChronicle » of the Human Rights Violations in Belarus in 2005 VIASNA « Human Rights Center Minsk 2006 1 REVIEWCHRONICLE of the human rights violations in Belarus in 2005 » VIASNA « Human Rights Center 2 Human Rights Center Viasna, 2006 REVIEWCHRONICLE of the human rights violations in Belarus in 2005 INTRODUCTION: main trends and generalizations The year of 2005 was marked by a considerable aggravation of the general situation in the field of human rights in Belarus. It was not only political rights » that were violated but social, economic and cultural rights as well. These viola- tions are constant and conditioned by the authoritys voluntary policy, with Lu- kashenka at its head. At the same time, human rights violations are not merely VIASNA a side-effect of the authoritarian state control; they are deliberately used as a « means of eradicating political opponents and creating an atmosphere of intimi- dation in the society. The negative dynamics is characterized by the growth of the number of victims of human rights violations and discrimination. Under these circums- tances, with a high level of latent violations and concealed facts, with great obstacles to human rights activity and overall fear in the society, the growth points to drastic stiffening of the regimes methods. Apart from the growing number of registered violations, one should men- Human Rights Center tion the increase of their new forms, caused in most cases by the development of the state oppressive machine, the expansion of legal restrictions and ad- ministrative control over social life and individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Grodno Region
    GRODNO REGION Preliminary Approximate cadastral № Location land plot Possible ways of use Infrastructure Encumbrances value, area, ha thousand USD Grodno city 1 Eandoursk motorway, near the 0,84 service station to be determined by no 216,72 filling station technical conditions 2 building estate "Baranovichi-1" 0,34 food services area, retail to be determined by 156,07 business technical conditions 3 to the south-east of the intersection 0,24 construction of a public facility to be determined by 303,75 of Dubko and Pushkina streets technical conditions 4 Gornovych str. (former territory of 1,75 construction of a shopping to be determined by 1930,6 the tannery) and service center technical conditions Berestovica district 5 Bol'shaya Berestovica town 0.23 construction of a retail facility available no 27 6 Berestovitskysettlement, Matrosova district, near str. the 3,54 the organization of the system determined by technical no 5,66 checkpoint across the state border of electronic queue of vehicles conditions and border security at the checkpoint "Berestovitsa" Volkovysk district 7 Volkovysk town, S.Pankovoj str. 1 cultural and recreational water pipeline, gas no 345,7 center, exhibition hall pipeline, sewerage, heating, electricity are available 8 Volkovysk town, Zenitchikov str. 2 production facility water pipeline, gas no 582 pipeline, sewerage, heating, electricity are available 9 Volkovysk town, Rokossovskogo 1 production facility water pipeline, gas no 153,9 str. pipeline, sewerage, electricity are available 10 Volkovysk town, 2 production facility water pipeline, gas no 264,6 Oktyabr'skaya str. pipeline, sewerage, (in the area of OJSC electricity are available "Volkovyskspectrans") 11 Volkovysk town, 10 production and storage facility water pipeline, gas no 1323 Oktyabr'skaya str.
    [Show full text]
  • The “Belarus Factor” from Balancing to Bridging Geopolitical Dividing Lines in Europe?
    The “Belarus factor” From balancing to bridging geopolitical dividing lines in Europe? Clingendael Report Tony van der Togt The “Belarus factor” From balancing to bridging geopolitical dividing lines in Europe? Tony van der Togt Clingendael Report January 2017 January 2017 © Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’. Cover photo: The leaders of Belarus, Russia, Germany, France and Ukraine after signing the Minsk II agreement, February 2015. © In Terris Online Newspaper Unauthorized use of any materials violates copyright, trademark and / or other laws. Should a user download material from the website or any other source related to the Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’, or the Clingendael Institute, for personal or non-commercial use, the user must retain all copyright, trademark or other similar notices contained in the original material or on any copies of this material. Material on the website of the Clingendael Institute may be reproduced or publicly displayed, distributed or used for any public and non-commercial purposes, but only by mentioning the Clingendael Institute as its source. Permission is required to use the logo of the Clingendael Institute. This can be obtained by contacting the Communication desk of the Clingendael Institute ([email protected]). The following web link activities are prohibited by the Clingendael Institute and may present trademark and copyright infringement issues: links that involve unauthorized use of our logo, framing, inline links, or metatags, as well as hyperlinks or a form of link disguising the URL. About the author Tony van der Togt is Senior Research Fellow at the Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’ in The Hague.
    [Show full text]
  • SITUATION of HUMAN RIGHTS in BELARUS in 2014
    Human Rights Centre “Viasna” SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS in BELARUS in 2014 REVIEW-CHRONICLE Minsk, 2015 SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN BELARUS in 2014 REVIEW-CHRONICLE Author and compiler: Tatsiana Reviaka Editor and author of the foreword: Valiantsin Stefanovich The edition was prepared on the basis of reviews of human rights violations in Belarus published every month in 2014. Each of the monthly reviews includes an analysis of the most important events infl uencing the observance of human rights and outlines the most eloquent and characteristic facts of human rights abuses registered over the described period. The review was prepared on the basis of personal appeals of victims of human rights abuses and the facts which were either registered by human rights activists or reported by open informational sources. The book features photos from the archive of the Human Rights Center “Viasna”, as well as from publications on the websites of Radio Free Europe/ Radio Liberty Belarus service, the Nasha Niva newspaper, tv.lrytas.lt, baj.by, gazetaby.com, and taken by Franak Viachorka and Siarhei Hudzilin. Human Rights Situation in 2014: Trends and Evaluation The situation of human rights during 2014 remained consistently poor with a tendency to deterioration at the end of the year. Human rights violations were of both systemic and systematic nature: basic civil and political rights were extremely restricted, there were no systemic changes in the fi eld of human rights (at the legislative level and (or) at the level of practices). The only positive development during the year was the early release of Ales Bialiatski, Chairman of the Human Rights Centre “Viasna” and Vice-President of the International Federation for Human Rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Edict of the President of the Republic of Belarus No 458 of August 4, 1999 [Amended As of October 22, 2012] on Creation of Free
    Edict of the President of the Republic of Belarus No 458 of August 4, 1999 [Amended as of October 22, 2012] On Creation of Free Economic Zone “Vitebsk” With the aim to attract national and foreign investments for organization and development of production facilities based on new and high technologies, to ensure favourable conditions for economic development of the regions of the Republic, I decree: 1. To create the Free Economic Zone “Vitebsk” for the period of 30 years of the total area of 2186,1546 ha within the boundaries according to Annex. 2. To establish that: 2.1. The Free Economic Zone “Vitebsk” (hereinafter – the FEZ "Vitebsk") is a complex zone; 2.2. financing of the development of the FEZ "Vitebsk", including industrial, engineering, transport and other infrastructure along with maintenance of the Administration of the FEZ "Vitebsk" and other expenses stipulated by the legislations for ensuring functioning of the zone, is carried out at the account of the means of the republic budget and the development fund of the FEZ "Vitebsk"; 2.3. The development fund of the FEZ "Vitebsk" is formed at the account of rent payments for the land and property, which are in operative administration of the Administration of the FEZ "Vitebsk», as well as from receipts in accordance with the contracts on activity conditions of economic entities in the territory of the zone. Specific sources of forming the development fund of the FEZ "Vitebsk" and directions of spending of its means are determined by the Council of Ministers of the Republic of Belarus. 3.
    [Show full text]
  • 1120 Not-So-Good Neighbors
    Commission on Security & Cooperation in Europe: U.S. Helsinki Commission “Not-So-Good Neighbors: Russian Influence in Belarus” Committee Members Present: Representative Alcee Hastings (D-FL), Chairman; Representative Joe Wilson (R-SC), Ranking Member; Witnesses: Sofya Orlosky, Senior Program Manager for Eurasia, Freedom House; Franak Viačorka, Research Media Analyst, US Agency for Global Media; Brian Whitmore, Senior Fellow and Director of the Russia Program, CEPA; Andrei Yeliseyeu, Head of Monitoring Unit, International Strategic Action Network for Security (iSANS); Research Director, EAST Center The Hearing Was Held From 9:58 a.m. To 11:28 a.m. in Room 2200, Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, D.C., Representative Alcee Hastings (D- FL), Chairman, Commission for Security and Cooperation in Europe, presiding Date: Wednesday, November 20, 2019 Transcript By Superior Transcriptions LLC www.superiortranscriptions.com HASTINGS: Good morning, everybody. It’s 10:00, and I have a bad habit of trying to start on time and end on time. You are welcome here to the U.S. Helsinki Commission hearing entitled “Not-So-Good Neighbors: Russian Influence in Belarus.” And with that, we’ll come to order and have opening statements and then turn to you all. This is a timely hearing coming off of the Belarusian election, in addition to the fact that I know all of you know that there is an ongoing proceeding that Russia is implicated in here on the Hill that is much more popular for the moment. We all know that the Kremlin’s disinformation and political interference reaches the shores of the United States and elsewhere in the region of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Embassy of India
    India - Belarus Relations Political India’s relations with Belarus have been traditionally warm and cordial. India was one of the first countries to recognize Belarus as independent country in 1991. Formal diplomatic relations were established and the Indian diplomatic mission was opened in Minsk in 1992 followed by Belarus in 1998 in New Delhi. There is good understanding and cooperation in the international, multilateral and regional matters with a remarkable commonality of views on almost all international and regional issues. Belarus has been supportive of India’s candidature for a permanent seat at the UNSC. Belarus supported India’s candidature for the non-permanent seat of UNSC for the years 2011-12. Belarus also supported India at the NSG. Belarus was also the co-sponsor the resolution moved by India to declare June 21 as International Day of Yoga. India supported Belarus for its membership in the NAM and also other international and multilateral fora like IPU which was appreciated. India’s supportive stand on various Resolutions in Geneva and New York targeting Belarus for violation of human rights and restrictions on freedom of expression has been appreciated by Belarus. Belarus recognizes India as an emerging global power and seeks to develop a “strategic relationship” with India. Late PM Rajiv Gandhi visited Minsk in 1985 when Belarus was still a part of Soviet Union. High level contacts with Belarus have been maintained. There have been several high level visits from both the sides including visits of President Alexander Lukashenko in 1997 and again in 2007. President of India Shri Pranab Mukherjee has paid an official visit to Belarus on 2-4 June 2015 and the Vice President of India in 2005 apart from other ministerial level visits also Parliamentary exchanges.
    [Show full text]