Nature Conservation Practical Year 2014

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nature Conservation Practical Year 2014 Polhillia on the brink: Taxonomy, ecophysiology and conservation assessment of a highly threatened Cape legume genus by Brian du Preez Thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Botany) in the Faculty of Science at Stellenbosch University Department of Botany and Zoology, University of Stellenbosch, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa. Supervisors: Prof. L.L. Dreyer, Prof. A.J. Valentine, Prof. M. Muasya April 2019 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za DECLARATION By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third-party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Date: ……15 February 2019……… Copyright ©2019 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved. i Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION....................................................................................................................... i LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................ vi LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................... x ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................................... xiii OPSOMMING....................................................................................................................... xiv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................. xvi DEDICATIONS ................................................................................................................... xvii CHAPTER 1 ............................................................................................................................. 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1 1. Greater Cape Floristic Region ............................................................................................ 1 2. Legume systematics ............................................................................................................. 2 3. Conservation ......................................................................................................................... 9 4. Soil nitrogen fixation.......................................................................................................... 11 5. Soil nutrients....................................................................................................................... 12 6. Aims and objectives of study ............................................................................................. 14 7. Breakdown of chapters ...................................................................................................... 14 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................... 16 CHAPTER 2 ........................................................................................................................... 30 THE GENERIC CONCEPT OF POLHILLIA C.H.STIRT. (GENISTEAE: FABACEAE): CONFIRMATION OF THE MONOPHYLY OF THE GENUS AND DESCRIPTION OF A NEW MONOTYPIC SUBGENUS ROSEOPOLHILLIA ............ 30 ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................ 30 1. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................. 31 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS ...................................................................................... 34 2.1. Morphology .................................................................................................................. 34 2.2. Molecular phylogenetic reconstruction ..................................................................... 34 3. RESULTS ........................................................................................................................... 37 3.1. Morphology .................................................................................................................. 37 3.2. Molecular phylogenetic reconstruction ..................................................................... 37 4. DISCUSSION ..................................................................................................................... 42 5. TAXONOMIC TREATMENT ......................................................................................... 44 5.1. Key to the genera of SA Genisteae ............................................................................. 44 ii Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za 5.2. Polhillia subgen. Polhillia C.H.Stirt. .......................................................................... 45 5.2.1. Taxonomy .............................................................................................................. 45 5.2.2. Species included: ................................................................................................... 45 5.2.3. Etymology .............................................................................................................. 47 5.2.4. Diagnostic characters ........................................................................................... 47 5.2.5. Distribution ........................................................................................................... 47 5.3. Polhillia subgen. Roseopolhillia B.du Preez, subgen. nov. ....................................... 49 5.3.1. Taxonomy .............................................................................................................. 49 5.3.2. Species included: ................................................................................................... 49 5.3.3. Etymology .............................................................................................................. 49 5.3.4. Diagnostic characters ........................................................................................... 49 5.3.5. Distribution ........................................................................................................... 50 6. CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................. 50 7. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................. 50 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................... 51 CHAPTER 3 ........................................................................................................................... 56 THE GENUS POLHILLIA C.H.STIRT. (GENISTEAE: FABACEAE): A MONOGRAPH ...................................................................................................................... 56 ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................ 56 1. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................. 57 2. HISTORICAL REVIEW .................................................................................................. 61 3. MATERIALS & METHODS............................................................................................ 64 3.1. Morphology .................................................................................................................. 64 3.1.1. Material collection ................................................................................................ 64 3.1.2. Morphological examination ................................................................................. 64 3.1.3. Palynology ............................................................................................................. 64 3.1.4. Leaf Anatomy ........................................................................................................ 65 3.2. Molecular phylogenetic analysis ................................................................................ 65 3.3. Phytogeography ........................................................................................................... 66 4. RESULTS ........................................................................................................................... 66 4.1. Taxonomic significance of different disciplines ........................................................ 66 4.1.1. Morphology ........................................................................................................... 66 4.1.2. Palynology ............................................................................................................. 71 4.1.3. Leaf anatomy......................................................................................................... 72 iii Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za 4.2. Molecular phylogenetic analysis ................................................................................ 76 4.3. Phytogeography ..........................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • News from the CREW
    Volume 6 • March 200 News from the CREW lthough 2009 has been a Asteraceae family) in full flower. REW, the Custodians of Areally challenging year with These plants are usually rather C Rare and Endangered the global recession having had inconspicuous and are very hard Wildflowers, is a programme a heavy impact on all of us, it to spot when not flowering, so that involves volunteers from we were very lucky to catch it could not break the strong spir- the public in the monitoring it of CREW. Amidst the great in flower. The CREW team has taken a special interest in the and conservation of South challenges we came up tops genus Marasmodes (we even Africa’s threatened plants. once again, with some excep- have a day in April dedicated to CREW aims to capacitate a tionally great discoveries. the monitoring of this genus) network of volunteers from as they all occur in the lowlands a range of socio-economic Our first great adventure for and are severely threatened. I backgrounds to monitor the year took place in the knew from the herbarium speci- and conserve South Afri- Villiersdorp area. We had to mens that there have not been ca’s threatened plant spe- collect flowering material of any collections of Marasmodes Prismatocarpus lycioides, a data cies. The programme links from the Villiersdorp area and volunteers with their local deficient species in the Campan- was therefore very excited conservation agencies and ulaceae family. We rediscovered about this discovery. As usual, this species in the area in 2008 my first reaction was: ‘It’s a particularly with local land and all we had to go on was a new species!’ but I soon so- stewardship initiatives to en- scrappy nonflowering branch.
    [Show full text]
  • South African Association of Botanists-Annual Meeting 2006
    South African Journal of Botany 72 (2006) 313–347 www.elsevier.com/locate/sajb Abstracts South African Association of Botanists-Annual Meeting 2006 Abstracts of papers and posters presented at the 32nd suppressing both the growth of cancer cell lines, and the ability of normal cell Annual Congress of the South African Association of lines to resist oxidative damage that might result in malignancy. Botanists held at the Nelson Mandela Metropolitan Botanists and those investigating the chemistry and biological activity of – medicinal plants need to develop, maintain and deepen their dialogue so that the University, Port Elizabeth, 16 19 January 2006 scientist can be assured of using the correct material, a skill which perhaps is retained by traditional healers but which is under threat of being lost for ever. The presenter of multi-authored papers is underlined Conservation cowboys: Perils and promise of privately ★ Awards made to students owned protected areas JA Langholz Plenary Lectures Graduate School of International Policy Studies, Monterey Institute of International Studies, Monterey CA 93940, United States of America Botany and pharmacy — the child is father of the man Although governments have traditionally assumed the leading role in PJ Houghton establishing national parks and other protected areas, a powerful new trend has Pharmacognosy Research Laboratories, Research Division of Pharmaceutical emerged in the last decade — the dramatic rise of privately owned protected Sciences, King's College London, 150 Stamford Street, London SE1 9NH, U.K. areas. Many of these areas conserve as much land as nearby national parks, if not more. On one hand, private sector willingness to create protected natural areas The interplay between the medicinal uses of plants and the need to classify comes as welcome relief, as most of the world's land and biodiversity remain them botanically is probably found in some form in every human culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Large‐Scale Genomic Sequence Data Resolve the Deepest Divergences in the Legume Phylogeny and Support a Near‐Simultaneous Evolutionary Origin of All Six Subfamilies
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2020 Large‐scale genomic sequence data resolve the deepest divergences in the legume phylogeny and support a near‐simultaneous evolutionary origin of all six subfamilies Koenen, Erik J M ; Ojeda, Dario I ; Steeves, Royce ; Migliore, Jérémy ; Bakker, Freek T ; Wieringa, Jan J ; Kidner, Catherine ; Hardy, Olivier J ; Pennington, R Toby ; Bruneau, Anne ; Hughes, Colin E Abstract: Phylogenomics is increasingly used to infer deep‐branching relationships while revealing the complexity of evolutionary processes such as incomplete lineage sorting, hybridization/introgression and polyploidization. We investigate the deep‐branching relationships among subfamilies of the Leguminosae (or Fabaceae), the third largest angiosperm family. Despite their ecological and economic importance, a robust phylogenetic framework for legumes based on genome‐scale sequence data is lacking. We generated alignments of 72 chloroplast genes and 7621 homologous nuclear‐encoded proteins, for 157 and 76 taxa, respectively. We analysed these with maximum likelihood, Bayesian inference, and a multispecies coa- lescent summary method, and evaluated support for alternative topologies across gene trees. We resolve the deepest divergences in the legume phylogeny despite lack of phylogenetic signal across all chloroplast genes and the majority of nuclear genes. Strongly supported conflict in the remainder of nuclear genes is suggestive of incomplete lineage sorting. All six subfamilies originated nearly simultaneously, suggesting that the prevailing view of some subfamilies as ‘basal’ or ‘early‐diverging’ with respect to others should be abandoned, which has important implications for understanding the evolution of legume diversity and traits.
    [Show full text]
  • Oberholzeria (Fabaceae Subfam. Faboideae), a New Monotypic Legume Genus from Namibia
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Oberholzeria (Fabaceae subfam. Faboideae), a New Monotypic Legume Genus from Namibia Wessel Swanepoel1,2*, M. Marianne le Roux3¤, Martin F. Wojciechowski4, Abraham E. van Wyk2 1 Independent Researcher, Windhoek, Namibia, 2 H. G. W. J. Schweickerdt Herbarium, Department of Plant Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa, 3 Department of Botany and Plant Biotechnology, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa, 4 School of Life Sciences, Arizona a11111 State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America ¤ Current address: South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, South Africa * [email protected] Abstract OPEN ACCESS Oberholzeria etendekaensis, a succulent biennial or short-lived perennial shrublet is de- Citation: Swanepoel W, le Roux MM, Wojciechowski scribed as a new species, and a new monotypic genus. Discovered in 2012, it is a rare spe- MF, van Wyk AE (2015) Oberholzeria (Fabaceae subfam. Faboideae), a New Monotypic Legume cies known only from a single locality in the Kaokoveld Centre of Plant Endemism, north- Genus from Namibia. PLoS ONE 10(3): e0122080. western Namibia. Phylogenetic analyses of molecular sequence data from the plastid matK doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122080 gene resolves Oberholzeria as the sister group to the Genisteae clade while data from the Academic Editor: Maharaj K Pandit, University of nuclear rDNA ITS region showed that it is sister to a clade comprising both the Crotalarieae Delhi, INDIA and Genisteae clades. Morphological characters diagnostic of the new genus include: 1) Received: October 3, 2014 succulent stems with woody remains; 2) pinnately trifoliolate, fleshy leaves; 3) monadel- Accepted: February 2, 2015 phous stamens in a sheath that is fused above; 4) dimorphic anthers with five long, basifixed anthers alternating with five short, dorsifixed anthers, and 5) pendent, membranous, one- Published: March 27, 2015 seeded, laterally flattened, slightly inflated but indehiscent fruits.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and Ecology of Critically Endangered, Rûens Silcrete Renosterveld in the Buffeljagsrivier Area, Swellendam
    Biodiversity and Ecology of Critically Endangered, Rûens Silcrete Renosterveld in the Buffeljagsrivier area, Swellendam by Johannes Philippus Groenewald Thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters in Science in Conservation Ecology in the Faculty of AgriSciences at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Prof. Michael J. Samways Co-supervisor: Dr. Ruan Veldtman December 2014 Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration I hereby declare that the work contained in this thesis, for the degree of Master of Science in Conservation Ecology, is my own work that have not been previously published in full or in part at any other University. All work that are not my own, are acknowledge in the thesis. ___________________ Date: ____________ Groenewald J.P. Copyright © 2014 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved ii Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Acknowledgements Firstly I want to thank my supervisor Prof. M. J. Samways for his guidance and patience through the years and my co-supervisor Dr. R. Veldtman for his help the past few years. This project would not have been possible without the help of Prof. H. Geertsema, who helped me with the identification of the Lepidoptera and other insect caught in the study area. Also want to thank Dr. K. Oberlander for the help with the identification of the Oxalis species found in the study area and Flora Cameron from CREW with the identification of some of the special plants growing in the area. I further express my gratitude to Dr. Odette Curtis from the Overberg Renosterveld Project, who helped with the identification of the rare species found in the study area as well as information about grazing and burning of Renosterveld.
    [Show full text]
  • Fruits and Seeds of Genera in the Subfamily Faboideae (Fabaceae)
    Fruits and Seeds of United States Department of Genera in the Subfamily Agriculture Agricultural Faboideae (Fabaceae) Research Service Technical Bulletin Number 1890 Volume I December 2003 United States Department of Agriculture Fruits and Seeds of Agricultural Research Genera in the Subfamily Service Technical Bulletin Faboideae (Fabaceae) Number 1890 Volume I Joseph H. Kirkbride, Jr., Charles R. Gunn, and Anna L. Weitzman Fruits of A, Centrolobium paraense E.L.R. Tulasne. B, Laburnum anagyroides F.K. Medikus. C, Adesmia boronoides J.D. Hooker. D, Hippocrepis comosa, C. Linnaeus. E, Campylotropis macrocarpa (A.A. von Bunge) A. Rehder. F, Mucuna urens (C. Linnaeus) F.K. Medikus. G, Phaseolus polystachios (C. Linnaeus) N.L. Britton, E.E. Stern, & F. Poggenburg. H, Medicago orbicularis (C. Linnaeus) B. Bartalini. I, Riedeliella graciliflora H.A.T. Harms. J, Medicago arabica (C. Linnaeus) W. Hudson. Kirkbride is a research botanist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, BARC West Room 304, Building 011A, Beltsville, MD, 20705-2350 (email = [email protected]). Gunn is a botanist (retired) from Brevard, NC (email = [email protected]). Weitzman is a botanist with the Smithsonian Institution, Department of Botany, Washington, DC. Abstract Kirkbride, Joseph H., Jr., Charles R. Gunn, and Anna L radicle junction, Crotalarieae, cuticle, Cytiseae, Weitzman. 2003. Fruits and seeds of genera in the subfamily Dalbergieae, Daleeae, dehiscence, DELTA, Desmodieae, Faboideae (Fabaceae). U. S. Department of Agriculture, Dipteryxeae, distribution, embryo, embryonic axis, en- Technical Bulletin No. 1890, 1,212 pp. docarp, endosperm, epicarp, epicotyl, Euchresteae, Fabeae, fracture line, follicle, funiculus, Galegeae, Genisteae, Technical identification of fruits and seeds of the economi- gynophore, halo, Hedysareae, hilar groove, hilar groove cally important legume plant family (Fabaceae or lips, hilum, Hypocalypteae, hypocotyl, indehiscent, Leguminosae) is often required of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Sci 2009 Bergh N G.Pdf
    The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgementTown of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Cape Published by the University ofof Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University Systematics of the Relhaniinae (Asteraceae- Gnaphalieae) in southern Africa: geography and evolution in an endemic Cape plant lineage. Nicola Georgina Bergh Town Thesis presented for theCape Degree of DOCTOR OF ofPHILOSOPHY in the Department of Botany UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN University May 2009 Town Cape of University ii ABSTRACT The Greater Cape Floristic Region (GCFR) houses a flora unique for its diversity and high endemicity. A large amount of the diversity is housed in just a few lineages, presumed to have radiated in the region. For many of these lineages there is no robust phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships, and few Cape plants have been examined for the spatial distribution of their population genetic variation. Such studies are especially relevant for the Cape where high rates of species diversification and the ongoing maintenance of species proliferation is hypothesised. Subtribe Relhaniinae of the daisy tribe Gnaphalieae is one such little-studied lineage. The taxonomic circumscription of this subtribe, the biogeography of its early diversification and its relationships to other members of the Gnaphalieae are elucidated by means of a dated phylogenetic hypothesis. Molecular DNA sequence data from both chloroplast and nuclear genomes are used to reconstruct evolutionary history using parsimony and Bayesian tools for phylogeny estimation.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Report
    2016 Progress Report U.S. Department of Energy 2016 JGI PROGRESS REPORT 2016 Joint Genome Institute Cover photo: Mount Diablo at sunrise, Contra Costa County, California. (Mark Lilly Photography) Table of Contents 1 DOE JGI Mission 2 Director’s Perspective 8 Achieving the DOE Mission 10 Organizational Structure 12 Impact 2016 18 Case Study: A Decade of Poplar Genomics 20 Science: Year in Review 22 Bioenergy 32 Biogeochemistry 44 Computational Infrastructure 46 Appendices 47 Appendix A: Acronyms at a Glance 48 Appendix B: Glossary 52 Appendix C: 2016 User Programs Supported Proposals 59 Appendix D: Advisory and Review Committee Members 62 Appendix E: 2016 Genomics of Energy and Environment Meeting 64 Appendix F: 2016 Publications DOE JGI Mission Golden Gate Bridge, San Francisco, California before dawn. (Peter Burnett) 1 The mission of the U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute (DOE JGI) is to serve the diverse scientific community as a national user facility, enabling the application of large-scale genomics and analysis of plants, microbes, and communities of microbes to address the DOE mission goals of harnessing science and technology to address energy and environmental challenges. 2 Axel Visel (Marilyn Chung, Berkeley Lab) Director’s Perspective 3 Forging Ahead With a Joint Vision In 2016, the DOE Joint Genome Institute continued on its trajectory of evolving as a Next- Generation Genome Science User Facility that offers its large user community access to cutting-edge genomics capabilities. A continuing trend across our scientific programs is an increased emphasis on approaches that go beyond the assembly of reference genomes. DOE JGI users can now leverage a growing portfolio of advanced experimental and computational techniques to understand the function of genes and genomes, turning sequence data into biological insights.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Plantfamilie ASTERACEAE: 6
    ISSN 0254-3486 = SA Tydskrif vir Natuurwetenskap en Tegnologie 23, no. 1 & 2 2004 35 Algemene artikel Die plantfamilie ASTERACEAE: 6. Die subfamilie Asteroideae P.P.J. Herman Nasionale Botaniese Instituut, Privaat sak X101, Pretoria, 0001 e-pos: [email protected] UITTREKSEL Die tribusse van die subfamilie Asteroideae word meer volledig in hierdie artikel beskryf. Die genusse wat aan dié tribusse behoort word gelys en hulle verspreiding aangedui. ABSTRACT The plant family Asteraceae: 6. The subfamily Asteroideae. The tribes of the subfamily Asteroideae are described in this article. Genera belonging to the different tribes are listed and their distribution given. INLEIDING Tribus ANTHEMIDEAE Cass. Hierdie artikel is die laaste in die reeks oor die plantfamilie Verteenwoordigers van hierdie tribus is gewoonlik aromaties, Asteraceae.1-5 In die vorige artikel is die klassifikasie bokant byvoorbeeld Artemisia afra (wilde-als), Eriocephalus-soorte, familievlak asook die indeling van die familie Asteraceae in sub- Pentzia-soorte.4 Die feit dat hulle aromaties is, beteken dat hulle families en tribusse bespreek.5 Hierdie artikel handel oor die baie chemiese stowwe bevat. Hierdie stowwe word dikwels subfamilie Asteroideae van die familie Asteraceae, met ’n aangewend vir medisyne (Artemisia) of insekgif (Tanacetum).4 bespreking van die tribusse en die genusse wat aan die verskillende Verder is hulle blaartjies gewoonlik fyn verdeeld en selfs by dié tribusse behoort. Die ‘edelweiss’ wat in die musiekblyspel The met onverdeelde blaartjies, is die blaartjies klein en naaldvormig sound of music besing word, behoort aan die tribus Gnaphalieae (Erica-agtig). Die pappus bestaan gewoonlik uit vry of vergroeide van die subfamilie Asteroideae.
    [Show full text]
  • Cheniella Gen. Nov. (Leguminosae: Cercidoideae) from Southern China, Indochina and Malesia
    © European Journal of Taxonomy; download unter http://www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu; www.zobodat.at European Journal of Taxonomy 360: 1–37 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2017.360 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2017 · Clark R.P. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Research article Cheniella gen. nov. (Leguminosae: Cercidoideae) from southern China, Indochina and Malesia Ruth P. CLARK 1,*, Barbara A. MACKINDER 1,2 & Hannah BANKS 3 1,3 Herbarium, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AE, UK. 2 Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh, 20A Inverleith Row, EH3 5LR, UK. * Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 Email: [email protected] 3 Email: [email protected] Abstract. For much of the last thirty years, the caesalpinioid genus Bauhinia has been recognised by numerous authors as a broadly circumscribed, ecologically, morphologically and palynologically diverse pantropical taxon, comprising several subgenera. One of these, Bauhinia subg. Phanera has recently been reinstated at generic rank based on a synthesis of morphological and molecular data. Nevertheless, there remains considerable diversity within Phanera. Following a review of palynological and molecular studies of Phanera in conjunction with a careful re-examination of the morphological heterogeneity within the genus, we have found strong evidence that the species of Phanera subsect. Corymbosae are a natural group that warrant generic status. We describe here the genus Cheniella R.Clark & Mackinder gen. nov. to accommodate them. It comprises 10 species and 3 subspecies, one newly described here. Generic characters include leaves that are simple and emarginate or bilobed; fl owers with elongate hypanthia which are as long as or much longer than the sepals; pods that are glabrous, compressed, oblong, indehiscent or tardily dehiscent; and with numerous seeds, the seeds bearing an unusually long funicle extending most of the way around their circumference.
    [Show full text]
  • Combined Phylogenetic Analyses Reveal Interfamilial Relationships and Patterns of floral Evolution in the Eudicot Order Fabales
    Cladistics Cladistics 1 (2012) 1–29 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2012.00392.x Combined phylogenetic analyses reveal interfamilial relationships and patterns of floral evolution in the eudicot order Fabales M. Ange´ lica Belloa,b,c,*, Paula J. Rudallb and Julie A. Hawkinsa aSchool of Biological Sciences, Lyle Tower, the University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire RG6 6BX, UK; bJodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK; cReal Jardı´n Bota´nico-CSIC, Plaza de Murillo 2, CP 28014 Madrid, Spain Accepted 5 January 2012 Abstract Relationships between the four families placed in the angiosperm order Fabales (Leguminosae, Polygalaceae, Quillajaceae, Surianaceae) were hitherto poorly resolved. We combine published molecular data for the chloroplast regions matK and rbcL with 66 morphological characters surveyed for 73 ingroup and two outgroup species, and use Parsimony and Bayesian approaches to explore matrices with different missing data. All combined analyses using Parsimony recovered the topology Polygalaceae (Leguminosae (Quillajaceae + Surianaceae)). Bayesian analyses with matched morphological and molecular sampling recover the same topology, but analyses based on other data recover a different Bayesian topology: ((Polygalaceae + Leguminosae) (Quillajaceae + Surianaceae)). We explore the evolution of floral characters in the context of the more consistent topology: Polygalaceae (Leguminosae (Quillajaceae + Surianaceae)). This reveals synapomorphies for (Leguminosae (Quillajaceae + Suri- anaceae)) as the presence of free filaments and marginal ⁄ ventral placentation, for (Quillajaceae + Surianaceae) as pentamery and apocarpy, and for Leguminosae the presence of an abaxial median sepal and unicarpellate gynoecium. An octamerous androecium is synapomorphic for Polygalaceae. The development of papilionate flowers, and the evolutionary context in which these phenotypes appeared in Leguminosae and Polygalaceae, shows that the morphologies are convergent rather than synapomorphic within Fabales.
    [Show full text]
  • Elytropappus Rhinocerotis
    Alfred Maroyi /J. Pharm. Sci. & Res. Vol. 11(10), 2019, 3508-3513 Ethnomedicinal uses, phytochemistry and pharmacological properties of Elytropappus rhinocerotis Alfred Maroyi Department of Biodiversity, University of Limpopo, Private Bag X1106, Sovenga 0727, South Africa. Abstract Elytropappus rhinocerotis is a small perennial shrub widely used as traditional medicine in South Africa. This study is aimed at providing a critical review of the botany, medicinal uses, phytochemistry and pharmacological properties of E. rhinocerotis. Documented information on the botany, medicinal uses, phytochemistry and pharmacological properties of E. rhinocerotis was collected from several online sources which included BMC, Scopus, SciFinder, Google Scholar, Science Direct, Elsevier, Pubmed and Web of Science. Additional information on the botany, medicinal uses, phytochemistry and pharmacological properties of E. rhinocerotis was gathered from pre-electronic sources such as book chapters, books, journal articles and scientific publications sourced from the University library. This study showed that the leaves, roots, stems and twigs of E. rhinocerotis are mainly used as appetite stimulant and tonic, and traditional medicines for high blood pressure, backache, convulsions, foot perspiration and odour, respiratory problems, sores and wounds, bladder problems, kidney problems, vermifuge, diabetes, fever, painful hands and feet, influenza, ulcers, cancer and stomach cancer and stomach problems. Phytochemical compounds identified from the aerial parts and
    [Show full text]