298 How to Balance Forestry and Biodiversity Conservation
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
How to balance forestry and biodiversity conservation – A view across Europe 298 Hèches – ‘Groupement Forestier des montagnes particulières de’: a case from the mountains of southwestern France C 9 L. Larrieu1, G. Verdier 2 1 INRAE, UMR Dynafor, Castanet-Tolosan, France; CRPF Occitanie, Tarbes, France 2 GF president, Hèches, France Context, legal frame, and ownership (fig. C 9.1). The forests here have always been mul- structure tifunctional, and have mixed wood production, pastoralism, hunting, and harvesting of mushrooms The private forest area called ‘Groupement Fores- and forest berries. tier (GF) des montagnes particulières de Hèches’ In accordance with the presence of a wide array is located on the northern slope of the central of geological substrates, stands thrive in areas Pyrenees mountains in the region of Occitanie where the soil is thick and nutrient-rich, while in France N km 0 0,5 1 2 3 Sources: Esri, Airbus DS, USGS, NGA, NASA, CGIAR, N Robinson, NCEAS, NLS, OS, NMA, Geodatastyrelsen, Rijkswaterstaat, GSA, Geoland, FEMA, NMA, Geodatastyrelsen, Rijkswaterstaat, GSA, Geoland, NCEAS, NLS, OS, CGIAR, N Robinson, DS, USGS, NGA, NASA, Sources: Esri, Airbus Community contributors,and the GIS User NOAA,USGS, © OpenStreetMap Garmin, FAO, Sources: Esri, HERE, and the GIS user community; Intermap < Fig. C 9.1. Overview of the GF property; beech-fir stands dominate; however, the complex topography and geology favours a wide range of forest habitats. Because of the a very old tradition of livestock farming, grass- lands have replaced the subalpine forest (Photo: Laurent Larrieu). 299 Timber/Biomass Statement Groundwater Non-timber products “In the context of rapid biodiversity loss and climate change, we must adopt a fully Climate Erosion integrated management approach to try passing on to our children a property which will last centuries while providing Landscape Protection all the ecosystem services we have enjoyed to date.” Recreation Biodiversity Table C 9.1. General information on the forests of the GF des montagnes particulières de Hèches. Forest community Mostly mixed beech-fir montane forest (Fagion sylvaticae and Luzulo-Fagion). Locally Tilio-Acerion ravine forests and Cephalante- ro-Fagion dry beech forest Total forest area 930 ha (+272 ha of subalpine meadows) Main management type Selective cutting system Total mean volume Very wide range according to a wide array of soil conditions; from a few m3/ha (rocky soils) to more than 600 m3/ha (thick fertile soils) Annual growth Very variable. More than 10 m3/ha for the most productive stands Deadwood Wide range depending on local conditions and management intensity: from 9 to 60 m3/ha (diameter >10 cm) Altitude 620–1900 m a.s.l. (forest: 620–1500 m) Ownership Private forest; ‘Groupement Forestier’ status Geology 23 different substrates. Four main categories: (i) hard nutrient-rich Mesozoic limestones and dolomites; (ii) soft nutrient-rich Mesozoic clayey limestones and marls; (iii) acidic nutrient-poor Palaeozoic shales, Mesozoic puddingstones (conglomerate), ophite, etc.; and (iv) very acidic and strongly nutrient-poor Palaeozoic quartzite and shales Protected area 0 ha Nature protection area (Natura 2000) 0 ha Protected area for the water spring of the 20 ha with specific constraints on management community Area without harvesting Roughly 200 ha (20 %) other areas (e.g. on rocky soils and in open sunny carried out by the owners themselves. When areas) the stands are made up of small trees. How- needed, owners can be helped in technical decision ever, the Atlantic macroclimate means that the issues by an adviser from the Centre Regional de la average precipitation is high and the temperatures Propriété Forestière d’Occitanie (CRPFOcc, Occita- are relatively warm (fig. C 9.2), meaning that for- nie Regional Forest Ownership Centre). Except fire- ests can thrive. wood, the wood is sold to independent forest oper- The forest owner group is made up of roughly ators. Every summer, sheep, cows, and horses are 100 local people. The management decision-mak- grazed on the subalpine meadows. The animals ing body is a board with 14 members led by a pres- belong to two of the owners of the GF, but also to ident. The forest operations and management are livestock farmers who lease the right to graze their 300 C 9 Hèches, France animals on the land. Hunting rights and rights to A group of local farmers bought the property mushroom harvesting are reserved for the GF own- in 1860, with the main aim to use the subalpine ers and village inhabitants. meadows for livestock grazing in summer. Livestock Two of GF’s owners are employed part-time as also used some stands for grazing, particularly the rangers, with one focussing on forest issues and stands alongside paths, and stands located on one focussing on livestock issues. south-facing slopes which are sunny and become free from snow early in spring. Wood products were mostly for domestic use (firewood from Portrait broadleaves, timber from silver fir) or charcoal pro- duction for the local steel industry (that were in “As the president representing the owner set of production until 1943). For charcoal production, the GF, my mission is to apply sustainable and mul- stands were managed according to the coppice tifunctional management that benefits the owners, selection method. This forest history explains the but also the other villagers. The challenge is to rec- current dominance of beech (Fagus sylvatica) at the oncile production of high-quality timber, hosting of expense of silver fir (Abies alba) since grazing, fire livestock, the presence of a large game population and intensive logging favours tree species which allowing traditional hunting activities, and finally can sprout. harvesting of edible mushrooms and berries. In In the period from the end of World War II to addition, this property is also an area for recrea- 1978, there was very little harvesting. In 1979, the tional activities for people from outside the vil- owners shifted to timber production. However, lage.” summer grazing by livestock remained a necessity. A huge effort to build a road network (about 45 km) combining both truck and dirt roads pro- Forest history and cultural heritage vided access to about 80 % of the area. As beech timber has a high value, the stands were regularly The subalpine meadows have been grazed by live- logged until 2000, and annual harvesting was on stock for >5000 years. Old maps (Cassini’s maps, average about 3000 m3. A drop in wood price 1770; Vallauri et al. 2012) show a forest cover simi- slowed down the rate of logging after 2000 and to lar to the current one. Most of the stands were har- 2010. Since 2010, about 6000 m3 of timber have vested periodically between the seventeenth and been harvested annually. twentieth centuries, mainly for charcoal produc- Stands are mainly composed by naturally regen- tion. In the nineteenth century, the forest owners erated native species (fig. C 9.3). There are only a were also the owners of steel mills. few plantations of non-native conifers (about 10 ha), a b 180 mm 60°C 25°C 150 mm 50°C 20°C 07 08 n 120 mm 40°C 06 15°C 09 90 mm 30°C 05 10°C Growing season 60 mm 20°C 10 Precipitatio Temperature 04 11 5°C 30 mm 10°C 03 12 02 01 0 mm 0°C 0°C 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 20 mm 40 mm 60 mm 80 mm 100 mm 120 mm 140 mm 160 mm Months Precipitation Fig. C 9.2. Weather data (Hèches, 940 m a.s.l., Aurelhy model, 1981–2010); panel a: ombrothermic diagram using the scale ratio P = 3T since macroclimate is Atlantic; panel b: Climate graph, numbers indicate months. 301 How to balance forestry and biodiversity conservation – A view across Europe including Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), black Most important services and products pine (Pinus nigra), European larch (Larix decidua). Some native broadleaved species have also been The wood sale is the most important income for the planted, including sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus), owners, mostly timber (about 30–45 % of the vol- wild cherry (Prunus avium), and beech (about 20 ha). ume) (fig. C 9.4). The main expense is due to the The conifers were planted in 1992 and the maintenance of the road network (fig. C 9.5). broadleaves were planted in 1997, on ancient graz- ing or burned areas. The water spring, used for decades by the Conservation interest – habitats and rare whole village, is located on the property. A new species protection buffer has been set up in 2000, strictly protecting about 0.2 ha and constraining the Eighteen habitat types have been identified, includ- management of forest on the 20 ha around the ing forest and non-forest habitats (Pénin and Lar- spring. gier 2000). Biological inventories revealed the pres- ence of 374 species of beetles (including some rare species such as Teredus cylindricus, Denticollis Aims of the owners rubens, Microrhagus emyi or Malthinus bilineatus), 104 species of hoverflies (Diptera, Syrphidae), 17 In a global framework of sustainable management, species of bats, and the spider Harpactocrates the current economic aims of the owners are to ravastellus which is endemic to the Pyrenees (Lar- obtain an income from timber, provide annual fuel- rieu 2005). Fungi assemblages observed in dry Ses- wood for the owners (about 120 m3), and optimise leria caerulea beech-fir forest are unique in com- the use of the subalpine meadows by allowing live- parison with other European habitats of stock owners from outside the GF, since there Cephalanthero-Fagion (Corriol and Larrieu 2008). amount of livestock belonging to the local forest Because of the wide array of substrata and owners has declined.