DOCSLIB.ORG

Enceladus Vent Explorer Concept 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Enceladus Vent Explorer Concept 1 2016 NIAC Phase I Study Journey to the Center of Icy Moons Enceladus Vent Explorer Concept 2016 NIAC Phase I Study: Journey to the Center of Icy Moons 1 (C) 2017 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Study Team Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology PI: Dr. Masahiro (Hiro) Ono Dr. Karl Mitchel Dr. Aaron Parness Kalind Carpenter Dr. Aaron Curtis Dr. Mitch Ingham Dr. Charles Budney Dr. Tara Estlin Dr. Carolyn Parcheta Dr. Renaud Detry Jeremy Nash Dr. Jean-Pierre de la Croix Jessie Kawata Dr. Kevin Hand Università di Pisa Saverio Iacoponi Massachusetts Institute of Technology Ellie Simonson Acknowledgements This work was funded by the NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts (NIAC) program. We thank Penny Boston, Peter Willis, Morgan Cable, Florian Kehl, Matt Heverly, Noah Warner, Steve Sell, and Sabrina Feldman for valuable inputs. 2016 NIAC Phase I Study: Journey to the Center of Icy Moons 2 Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 5 2 Mission Concept ............................................................................................................ 11 2.1 System Configuration ......................................................................................................... 11 2.1.1 Descent module (DM) ........................................................................................................... 11 2.1.2 Surface module (SM) ............................................................................................................ 12 2.1.3 Carrier Relay Orbiter (CRO) .................................................................................................. 13 2.2 Mission Profile of EVE ........................................................................................................ 13 2.2.1 Launch, Cruise, Orbit Insertion, Landing ............................................................................... 13 2.2.2 Scout & eruption dynamics study ......................................................................................... 15 2.2.3 Sample return and in-situ science ........................................................................................ 15 2.3 Comparison with existing concepts .................................................................................... 16 2.3.1 Thermal Ice Probe (cryobot) ................................................................................................. 17 2.3.2 Mechanical Ice Probe ........................................................................................................... 18 2.3.3 Comparison with EVE ........................................................................................................... 19 3 Characterization of Environment in Enceladus Vents ..................................................... 21 3.1 Overview ........................................................................................................................... 21 3.2 Observed Data ................................................................................................................... 21 3.3 Dynamics Assumptions ...................................................................................................... 22 3.4 Vent dynamic model .......................................................................................................... 24 3.5 Diameter estimates ............................................................................................................ 29 3.6 Nozzle shape estimations ................................................................................................... 30 3.7 Suggestions for future study to better constrain key parameters ....................................... 30 4 Trade Studies ................................................................................................................. 32 4.1 Mobility System ................................................................................................................. 32 4.1.1 Mobility type ........................................................................................................................ 32 4.1.2 Attachment Mechanism ....................................................................................................... 33 4.2 Power System .................................................................................................................... 37 4.2.1 DM Energy Requirement ...................................................................................................... 37 4.2.2 Power Source Trade Study .................................................................................................... 44 4.3 Tether System .................................................................................................................... 47 4.4 Autonomy System .............................................................................................................. 49 4.4.1 Graceful degradation ............................................................................................................ 50 4.4.2 Goal-directed mobility .......................................................................................................... 50 4.4.3 Opportunistic science ........................................................................................................... 50 4.4.4 Software resilience ............................................................................................................... 51 4.5 Perception System ............................................................................................................. 51 4.5.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................... 51 4.5.2 Candidate Sensing Technologies .......................................................................................... 52 4.5.3 Discussion ............................................................................................................................. 54 4.6 Science Instruments ........................................................................................................... 56 4.6.1 Instruments on In-situ Science DM ....................................................................................... 56 4.6.2 Instruments on sample return DM ....................................................................................... 62 4.6.3 Instruments on SM ............................................................................................................... 63 5 Planetary Protection ...................................................................................................... 64 2016 NIAC Phase I Study: Journey to the Center of Icy Moons 3 6 Experimental Studies ..................................................................................................... 65 6.1 Energy required for ice screw insertion and removal .......................................................... 65 6.1.1 Thermal Chamber Experiments (-20 C) ................................................................................ 65 6.1.2 Conservative energy requirement estimate for the Insertion and Removal ........................ 68 of the Ice Screw ................................................................................................................................. 68 6.1.3 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................ 69 6.2 Ice screw’s resistance to sheer force .................................................................................. 69 6.2.1 Experiment Setup ................................................................................................................. 69 6.2.2 Results .................................................................................................................................. 70 6.2.3 Comparison with finite element model (FEM) ..................................................................... 72 7 Mechanical prototype design ......................................................................................... 74 7.1 Considered Configurations ................................................................................................. 74 7.1.1 Linear actuation vs joints ...................................................................................................... 74 7.1.2 Worm structure .................................................................................................................... 74 7.1.3 Four limbs head .................................................................................................................... 76 7.1.4 Two limbs .............................................................................................................................. 76 7.1.5 Two plus two limbs ............................................................................................................... 77 7.2 Linear actuators ................................................................................................................. 78 7.2.1 Actuator selection ................................................................................................................ 78 7.2.2 Final choice ..........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Monday, November 13, 2017 WHAT DOES IT MEAN to BE HABITABLE? 8:15 A.M. MHRGC Salons ABCD 8:15 A.M. Jang-Condell H. * Welcome C
    Monday, November 13, 2017 WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO BE HABITABLE? 8:15 a.m. MHRGC Salons ABCD 8:15 a.m. Jang-Condell H. * Welcome Chair: Stephen Kane 8:30 a.m. Forget F. * Turbet M. Selsis F. Leconte J. Definition and Characterization of the Habitable Zone [#4057] We review the concept of habitable zone (HZ), why it is useful, and how to characterize it. The HZ could be nicknamed the “Hunting Zone” because its primary objective is now to help astronomers plan observations. This has interesting consequences. 9:00 a.m. Rushby A. J. Johnson M. Mills B. J. W. Watson A. J. Claire M. W. Long Term Planetary Habitability and the Carbonate-Silicate Cycle [#4026] We develop a coupled carbonate-silicate and stellar evolution model to investigate the effect of planet size on the operation of the long-term carbon cycle, and determine that larger planets are generally warmer for a given incident flux. 9:20 a.m. Dong C. F. * Huang Z. G. Jin M. Lingam M. Ma Y. J. Toth G. van der Holst B. Airapetian V. Cohen O. Gombosi T. Are “Habitable” Exoplanets Really Habitable? A Perspective from Atmospheric Loss [#4021] We will discuss the impact of exoplanetary space weather on the climate and habitability, which offers fresh insights concerning the habitability of exoplanets, especially those orbiting M-dwarfs, such as Proxima b and the TRAPPIST-1 system. 9:40 a.m. Fisher T. M. * Walker S. I. Desch S. J. Hartnett H. E. Glaser S. Limitations of Primary Productivity on “Aqua Planets:” Implications for Detectability [#4109] While ocean-covered planets have been considered a strong candidate for the search for life, the lack of surface weathering may lead to phosphorus scarcity and low primary productivity, making aqua planet biospheres difficult to detect.
    [Show full text]
  • Enceladus Life Finder: the Search for Life in a Habitable Moon
    Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 17, EGU2015-14923, 2015 EGU General Assembly 2015 © Author(s) 2015. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Enceladus life finder: the search for life in a habitable moon. Jonathan Lunine (1), Hunter Waite (2), Frank Postberg (3), Linda Spilker (4), and Karla Clark (4) (1) Center for Radiophysics and Space Research, Cornell University, Ithaca ([email protected]), (2) Southwest Research Institute,San Antonio, ( [email protected]), (3) U. Stuttgart, Stuttgart, ([email protected]), (4) Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena CA 91125, ( [email protected]) Is there life elsewhere in the solar system? Guided by the principle that we can most easily recognize life as we know it—life that requires liquid water—Enceladus is particularly attractive because liquid water from its deep interior is actively erupting into space, making sampling of the interior straightforward. The Cassini Saturn Orbiter has provided the motivation. In particular, at high resolution, spatial coincidences between individual geysers and small-scale hot spots revealed the liquid reservoir supplying the eruptions to be not in the near-surface but deeper within the moon [1], putting on a firm foundation the principle that sampling the plume allows us to know the composition of the ocean. Sensitive gravity and topography measurements established the location and dimensions of that reservoir: ∼ 35 km beneath the SPT ice shell and extending out to at least 50 degrees latitude, implying an interior ocean large enough to have been stable over geologic time [2]. The Cassini ion neutral mass spectrometer (INMS) discovered organic and nitrogen-bearing molecules in the plume vapour, and the Cosmic Dust Analyser (CDA) detected salts in the plume icy grains, arguing strongly for ocean water being in con-tact with a rocky core [3], [4].
    [Show full text]
  • Valuing Life Detection Missions Edwin S
    Valuing life detection missions Edwin S. Kite* (University of Chicago), Eric Gaidos (University of Hawaii), Tullis C. Onstott (Princeton University). * [email protected] Recent discoveries imply that Early Mars was habitable for life-as-we-know-it (Grotzinger et al. 2014); that Enceladus might be habitable (Waite et al. 2017); and that many stars have Earth- sized exoplanets whose insolation favors surface liquid water (Dressing & Charbonneau 2013, Gaidos 2013). These exciting discoveries make it more likely that spacecraft now under construction – Mars 2020, ExoMars rover, JWST, Europa Clipper – will find habitable, or formerly habitable, environments. Did these environments see life? Given finite resources ($10bn/decade for the US1), how could we best test the hypothesis of a second origin of life? Here, we first state the case for and against flying life detection missions soon. Next, we assume that life detection missions will happen soon, and propose a framework (Fig. 1) for comparing the value of different life detection missions: Scientific value = (Reach × grasp × certainty × payoff) / $ (1) After discussing each term in this framework, we conclude that scientific value is maximized if life detection missions are flown as hypothesis tests. With hypothesis testing, even a nondetection is scientifically valuable. Should the US fly more life detection missions? Once a habitable environment has been found and characterized, life detection missions are a logical next step. Are we ready to do this? The case for emphasizing habitable environments, not life detection: Our one attempt to detect life, Viking, is viewed in hindsight as premature or at best uncertain. In-space life detection experiments are expensive.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 October
    TTSIQ #13 page 1 OCTOBER 2015 www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-confirms-evidence-that-liquid-water-flows-on-today-s-mars Flash! Sept. 28, 2015: www.space.com/30674-flowing-water-on-mars-discovery-pictures.html www.space.com/30673-water-flows-on-mars-discovery.html - “boosting odds for life!” These dark, narrow, 100 meter~yards long streaks called “recurring slope lineae” flowing downhill on Mars are inferred to have been formed by contemporary flowing water www.space.com/30683-mars-liquid-water-astronaut-exploration.html INDEX 2 Co-sponsoring Organizations NEWS SECTION pp. 3-56 3-13 Earth Orbit and Mission to Planet Earth 13-14 Space Tourism 15-20 Cislunar Space and the Moon 20-28 Mars 29-33 Asteroids & Comets 34-47 Other Planets & their moons 48-56 Starbound ARTICLES & ESSAY SECTION pp 56-84 56 Replace "Pluto the Dwarf Planet" with "Pluto-Charon Binary Planet" 61 Kepler Shipyards: an Innovative force that could reshape the future 64 Moon Fans + Mars Fans => Collaboration on Joint Project Areas 65 Editor’s List of Needed Science Missions 66 Skyfields 68 Alan Bean: from “Moonwalker” to Artist 69 Economic Assessment and Systems Analysis of an Evolvable Lunar Architecture that Leverages Commercial Space Capabilities and Public-Private-Partnerships 71 An Evolved Commercialized International Space Station 74 Remembrance of Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam 75 The Problem of Rational Investment of Capital in Sustainable Futures on Earth and in Space 75 Recommendations to Overcome Non-Technical Challenges to Cleaning Up Orbital Debris STUDENTS & TEACHERS pp 85-96 Past TTSIQ issues are online at: www.moonsociety.org/international/ttsiq/ and at: www.nss.org/tothestarsOO TTSIQ #13 page 2 OCTOBER 2015 TTSIQ Sponsor Organizations 1.
    [Show full text]
  • ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 8(07), 47-56
    ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 8(07), 47-56 Journal Homepage: -www.journalijar.com Article DOI:10.21474/IJAR01/11261 DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/11261 RESEARCH ARTICLE NANOTECHNOLOGY IN SPACE EXPLORATION– A REVIEW. Pranjali Pandurang Sankpal ,Vipul Sanjeev Patil and Satya Sandeep Chaganti Aerospace Engineering Sandip University Nashik, 422213, India. …………………………………………………………………………………………………….... Manuscript Info Abstract ……………………. ……………………………………………………………… Manuscript History Nanotechnology is one of the innovative technology in the world. Received: 05 May 2020 Today, most of the Nanotechnology is one of the innovative technology Final Accepted: 10 June 2020 in the world. Today, most of the researchers and technologists are Published: July 2020 looking for different ways to utilize nanotechnology to ameliorate the world. There are many applications of nanotechnology in aerospace Key words:- Nanotechnology in Space, Carbon and space explorer. Nanotechnology keystone in lowering mission cost Nanotubes, Space Elevator and mass with increasing efficiency and effectiveness. The paper shows a review of nanotechnology applications, advantages, and risks. Copy Right, IJAR, 2020,. All rights reserved. …………………………………………………………………………………………………….... Introduction:- Nanotechnology operates at the primary level of the structure of atoms and molecules and it promises the ability to build precise machines and components of molecular size[25]. Nanotechnology is usually described at a minimal dimension of 10 nanometers, equivalent to about 30 molecules. A more relevant definition of nanoscience is a dimension that cannot be further lowered without a substantial change of physical properties and non-theoretical or synthesis process. The exemption of nanotechnology is illustrated in Fig.1. The imbricate of electronics, biosciences, and materials designates the scope of nanotechnology[07].
    [Show full text]
  • Contamination Control Technology Study for Achieving the Science Objectives of Life-Detection Missions
    NASA/TM-20205008709 Contamination Control Technology Study for Achieving the Science Objectives of Life-Detection Missions Chris McKay, Alfonso Davila, Jennifer Eigenbrode, Chris Lorentson, Rob Gold, John Canham, Northrop Grumman, Anthony Dazzo, Therese Errigo, Faith Kujawa, Dave Kusnierkiewicz, Charles Sandy, Erich Schulze and Antonios Seas, October 2020 NASA STI Program ... in Profile Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. to the advancement of aeronautics and space Collected papers from scientific and science. The NASA scientific and technical technical conferences, symposia, seminars, information (STI) program plays a key part in or other meetings sponsored or helping NASA maintain this important role. co-sponsored by NASA. The NASA STI program operates under the SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific, auspices of the Agency Chief Information Officer. technical, or historical information from It collects, organizes, provides for archiving, and NASA programs, projects, and missions, disseminates NASA’s STI. The NASA STI often concerned with subjects having program provides access to the NTRS Registered substantial public interest. and its public interface, the NASA Technical Reports Server, thus providing one of the largest TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. collections of aeronautical and space science STI English-language translations of foreign in the world. Results are published in both non- scientific and technical material pertinent to NASA channels and by NASA in the NASA STI NASA’s mission. Report Series, which includes the following report types: Specialized services also include organizing and publishing research results, distributing TECHNICAL PUBLICATION. Reports of specialized research announcements and completed research or a major significant feeds, providing information desk and personal phase of research that present the results of search support, and enabling data exchange NASA Programs and include extensive data services.
    [Show full text]
  • Enceladus Probe Mission Design Using Titan Aerogravity-Assist
    15th International Planetary Probe Workshop, June 11–15, 2018, Boulder, Colorado Enceladus Probe Mission Design Using Titan Aerogravity-Assist Ye Lu | Ph.D. Candidate | [email protected] Sarag Saikia | [email protected] Purdue University, School of Aeronautics and Astronautics West Lafayette, IN 47907 Friday, June 15, 2018 Motivation • Larger launch vehicle (SLS, Falcon Heavy, BFR) – More delivered mass Higher arrival velocity – Shorter time of flight Propulsive orbit insertion Aerocapture/Aerogravity-assist • Aerocapture feasibility study – Requires different sets of interplanetary trajectories – At Titan, L/D = 0.3 requires and enables arrival velocity of 5 km/s • Expand mission envelope – Explore the benefit of aeroassist during the proposal phase 1 Why Enceladus? • Life? • Enceladus Mission studies Life Investigation For Enceladus Life Finder Journey to Enceladus Explorer of Enceladus and Enceladus (LIFE) (ELF) and Titan (JET) Titan (E2T) • Using Titan Aerogravity-Assist for Enceladus Orbit/Lander 2 What is Titan Aerogravity-Assist (AGA)? Titan RT = 1,221,870 km VT = 5.58 km/s P = 16 days Enceladus RE = 238,000 km VE = 12.63 km/s P = 33 hours V∞, Saturn 3 Transfer Orbit to Enceladus • Direct Transfer to Enceladus after Titan AGA • Moon tours at Tethys, Dione, and Rhea Moon of Saturn Tethys Dione Rhea Titan Distance from Saturn, in 4.89 6.26 8.74 20.27 Saturn radii ΔV capture at Enceladus 0.65 km/s 1.35 km/s 2.19 km/s 3.71 km/s 4 Titan AGA • Assumptions: – Low-L/D lifting vehicle – Circular orbit and planar motion • Trajectory constraints
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Deployment of a 3D Autonomous Subterranean Submarine Exploration Vehicle
    DESIGN AND DEPLOYMENT OF A 3D AUTONOMOUS SUBTERRANEAN SUBMARINE EXPLORATION VEHICLE William C. Stone, Stone Aerospace / PSC, Inc. 3511 Caldwell Lane, Del Valle, TX 78617, Ph: (512) 247-6385, [email protected] ABSTRACT likely include the following components: The NASA Deep Phreatic Thermal Explorer • the parent spacecraft, which will remain in orbit (DEPTHX) project is developing a fully autonomous either about Jupiter or about Europa and which will underwater vehicle intended as a prototype of primarily serve as a data relay back to Earth from the the Europa lander third stage that will search for Lander. microbial life beneath the ice cap of that Jovian • the Lander, which will be a 3-stage device: moon. DEPTHX has two principal objectives: First, to develop and test in an appropriate environment Stage 1: the physical landing system that will contain the ability for an un-tethered robot to explore into propulsion systems, power, and data relay systems to unknown 3D territory, to make a map of what it sees, communicate with the orbiter, and which will control and to use that map to return home; and second, to and carry out the descent and automated landing on demonstrate that science autonomy behaviors can the moon. identify likely zones for the existence of microbial life, to command an autonomous maneuvering Stage 2: the “cryobot” second stage, which will melt platform to move to those locations, conduct localized a hole through up to ten kilometers of ice cap before searches, and to autonomously collect microbial reaching the sub-surface liquid ocean. Although the life in an aqueous environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Extraordinary Encounters: an Encyclopedia of Extraterrestrials and Otherworldly Beings
    EXTRAORDINARY ENCOUNTERS EXTRAORDINARY ENCOUNTERS An Encyclopedia of Extraterrestrials and Otherworldly Beings Jerome Clark B Santa Barbara, California Denver, Colorado Oxford, England Copyright © 2000 by Jerome Clark All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, except for the inclusion of brief quotations in a review, without prior permission in writing from the publishers. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Clark, Jerome. Extraordinary encounters : an encyclopedia of extraterrestrials and otherworldly beings / Jerome Clark. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-57607-249-5 (hardcover : alk. paper)—ISBN 1-57607-379-3 (e-book) 1. Human-alien encounters—Encyclopedias. I. Title. BF2050.C57 2000 001.942'03—dc21 00-011350 CIP 0605040302010010987654321 ABC-CLIO, Inc. 130 Cremona Drive, P.O. Box 1911 Santa Barbara, California 93116-1911 This book is printed on acid-free paper I. Manufactured in the United States of America. To Dakota Dave Hull and John Sherman, for the many years of friendship, laughs, and—always—good music Contents Introduction, xi EXTRAORDINARY ENCOUNTERS: AN ENCYCLOPEDIA OF EXTRATERRESTRIALS AND OTHERWORLDLY BEINGS A, 1 Angel of the Dark, 22 Abductions by UFOs, 1 Angelucci, Orfeo (1912–1993), 22 Abraham, 7 Anoah, 23 Abram, 7 Anthon, 24 Adama, 7 Antron, 24 Adamski, George (1891–1965), 8 Anunnaki, 24 Aenstrians, 10 Apol, Mr., 25
    [Show full text]
  • Rest of the Solar System” As We Have Covered It in MMM Through the Years
    As The Moon, Mars, and Asteroids each have their own dedicated theme issues, this one is about the “rest of the Solar System” as we have covered it in MMM through the years. Not yet having ventured beyond the Moon, and not yet having begun to develop and use space resources, these articles are speculative, but we trust, well-grounded and eventually feasible. Included are articles about the inner “terrestrial” planets: Mercury and Venus. As the gas giants Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune are not in general human targets in themselves, most articles about destinations in the outer system deal with major satellites: Jupiter’s Io, Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto. Saturn’s Titan and Iapetus, Neptune’s Triton. We also include past articles on “Space Settlements.” Europa with its ice-covered global ocean has fascinated many - will we one day have a base there? Will some of our descendants one day live in space, not on planetary surfaces? Or, above Venus’ clouds? CHRONOLOGICAL INDEX; MMM THEMES: OUR SOLAR SYSTEM MMM # 11 - Space Oases & Lunar Culture: Space Settlement Quiz Space Oases: Part 1 First Locations; Part 2: Internal Bearings Part 3: the Moon, and Diferent Drums MMM #12 Space Oases Pioneers Quiz; Space Oases Part 4: Static Design Traps Space Oases Part 5: A Biodynamic Masterplan: The Triple Helix MMM #13 Space Oases Artificial Gravity Quiz Space Oases Part 6: Baby Steps with Artificial Gravity MMM #37 Should the Sun have a Name? MMM #56 Naming the Seas of Space MMM #57 Space Colonies: Re-dreaming and Redrafting the Vision: Xities in
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1803.04883V1 [Physics.Flu-Dyn] 13 Mar 2018
    Melting probe technology for subsurface exploration of extraterrestrial ice – Critical refreezing length and the role of gravity K. Sch¨uller, J. Kowalski∗ AICES Graduate School, RWTH Aachen University, Schinkelstr. 2, 52062 Aachen, Germany. Abstract The ’Ocean Worlds’ of our Solar System are covered with ice, hence the water is not directly accessible. Using melting probe technology is one of the promising technological approaches to reach those scientifically interesting water reservoirs. Melting probes basically consist of a heated melting head on top of an elongated body that contains the scientific payload. The traditional engineering approach to design such melting probes starts from a global energy balance around the melting head and quantifies the power necessary to sustain a specific melting velocity while preventing the probe from refreezing and stall in the channel. Though this approach is sufficient to design simple melting probes for terrestrial applications, it is too simplistic to study the probe’s performance for environmental conditions found on some of the Ocean’s Worlds, e.g. a lower value of the gravitational acceleration. This will be important, however, when designing exploration technologies for extraterrestrial purposes. We tackle the problem by explicitly modeling the physical processes in the thin melt film between the probe and the underlying ice. Our model allows to study melting regimes on bodies of different gravitational acceleration, and we explicitly compare melting regimes on Europa, Enceladus and Mars. In addition to that, our model allows to quantify the heat losses due to convective transport around the melting probe. We discuss to which extent these heat losses can be utilized to avoid the necessity of a side wall heating system to prevent stall, and introduce the notion of the ’Critical Refreezing Length’.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy Online Flexbook
    8: Astronomy Laura Enama Colleen Haag Julie Sandeen Say Thanks to the Authors Click http://www.ck12.org/saythanks (No sign in required) www.ck12.org AUTHORS Laura Enama To access a customizable version of this book, as well as other Colleen Haag interactive content, visit www.ck12.org Julie Sandeen CONTRIBUTORS David Bethel Mary Lusk CK-12 Foundation is a non-profit organization with a mission to reduce the cost of textbook materials for the K-12 market both in the U.S. and worldwide. Using an open-source, collaborative, and web-based compilation model, CK-12 pioneers and promotes the creation and distribution of high-quality, adaptive online textbooks that can be mixed, modified and printed (i.e., the FlexBook® textbooks). Copyright © 2015 CK-12 Foundation, www.ck12.org The names “CK-12” and “CK12” and associated logos and the terms “FlexBook®” and “FlexBook Platform®” (collectively “CK-12 Marks”) are trademarks and service marks of CK-12 Foundation and are protected by federal, state, and international laws. Any form of reproduction of this book in any format or medium, in whole or in sections must include the referral attribution link http://www.ck12.org/saythanks (placed in a visible location) in addition to the following terms. Except as otherwise noted, all CK-12 Content (including CK-12 Curriculum Material) is made available to Users in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC 3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc/3.0/), as amended and updated by Creative Com- mons from time to time (the “CC License”), which is incorporated herein by this reference.
    [Show full text]