DOCSLIB.ORG

Adjusting to Life in Retirement: the Protective Role of New Group Memberships and Identification As a Retiree

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Adjusting to Life in Retirement: the Protective Role of New Group Memberships and Identification As a Retiree European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology ISSN: 1359-432X (Print) 1464-0643 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/pewo20 Adjusting to life in retirement: the protective role of new group memberships and identification as a retiree Catherine Haslam, Ben C. P. Lam, Nyla R. Branscombe, Niklas K. Steffens, S. Alexander Haslam, Tegan Cruwys, Polly Fong & Thomas C. Ball To cite this article: Catherine Haslam, Ben C. P. Lam, Nyla R. Branscombe, Niklas K. Steffens, S. Alexander Haslam, Tegan Cruwys, Polly Fong & Thomas C. Ball (2018) Adjusting to life in retirement: the protective role of new group memberships and identification as a retiree, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27:6, 822-839 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1538127 Published online: 05 Nov 2018. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 44 View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=pewo20 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 2018, VOL. 27, NO. 6, 822–839 https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1538127 Adjusting to life in retirement: the protective role of new group memberships and identification as a retiree Catherine Haslama, Ben C. P. Lama, Nyla R. Branscombeb, Niklas K. Steffensa, S. Alexander Haslama, Tegan Cruwys c, Polly Fonga and Thomas C. Ballb aSchool of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; bDepartment of Psychology, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA; cResearch School of Psychology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Among the many factors that influence retirement adjustment, there is increasing recognition of the Received 31 May 2018 role played by people’s social relationships. In particular, research points to the benefits that joining Accepted 8 October 2018 ’ new groups can have for people s well-being when they experience life change. In three studies, we KEYWORDS extend this research to assess the contribution that new groups and identities make to supporting the Retirement; adjustment; well-being and adjustment of people transitioning to retirement. Study 1, involving 302 retirees, well-being; retiree identity; demonstrates that joining new groups in retirement and developing a stronger sense of identification social identity with retirees predicts life satisfaction after controlling for known predictors (e.g., financial planning, marital status, physical health status, retirement aspirations), while only retiree identification predicts adjustment. We then examine the extent to which multiple group memberships support retirement adjustment and well-being through the mediating role of new group memberships and retiree identification. This is first examined in a cross-sectional study of 90 retired academics (Study 2) and then in a two-wave study involving a general sample of 121 recent retirees (Study 3). Findings from both studies point to the importance of social group and identity gain in retirement adjustment and highlight the particular importance of retiree identification in the transition. Many factors influence successful ageing in retirement, and in adjustment. More specifically, it examines the extent to researchers are increasingly recognizing how important which these two factors support adjustment over and above adjustment to this major life transition is for health and well- established predictors (Study 1) and function as a mechanism being. Indeed, up to 20% of people do not adjust well to to facilitate successful adjustment and well-being in retire- retirement (e.g., Pinquart & Schindler, 2007; Szinovacz, 2003) ment (Studies 2 and 3). and this increases their vulnerability to health-related pro- blems over the course of this transition (Hunter, Wang, & Factors influencing retirement adjustment Worsley, 2007; Wang & Shi, 2014). Here, however, social rela- tionships appear to play a protective role, both as we age and Reflecting the diversity in people’s experience, there is con- as we experience life change, and there is growing evidence siderable variability in the way that retirement is defined. For that our relationships with other people in social groups (e.g., some people, retirement involves leaving work altogether. For with family, friendship, community, and interest groups) may others, it might involve stopping work in one’s primary pro- be especially important in this regard (e.g., Glei et al., 2005; fession while continuing to engage in part-time work (either in Haslam et al., 2018; Jetten, Haslam, & Haslam, 2012). a similar or different capacity to one’s primary profession) or Speaking to these issues, the Social Identity Model of Identity returning to work of some form later in retirement. Given Change (SIMIC) specifies the various social group processes these diverse experiences, studies typically define retirement that support health and well-being in periods of life change. as a life transition that primarily involves formally stopping In-line with one of this model’s core principles, previous work in one’s primary career, but which might also involve research has highlighted the importance of social group mem- engaging in some alternative form of work. This is the defini- berships and associated social identity capital for retirement tion that informs the present research. adjustment (Steffens, Cruwys, Haslam, Jetten, & Haslam, 2016a; This transition involves a range of changes that affect retirees’ Steffens, Jetten, Haslam, Cruwys, & Haslam, 2016b). The pre- vocational identity, financial standing, daily activities and rou- sent research extends this work by examining the particular tines, and social relationships (e.g., Schlossberg, 2004;van role that development of new group memberships in retire- Solinge & Henkens, 2008). Each of these impact on well-being ment, and of a strong sense of identification with retirees, play in retirement and a person’s capacity to adjust to the transition. CONTACT Catherine Haslam [email protected] This work was supported by an Australian Research Council Discovery grant (DP160102514) and the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Social Identity Interactions and Well-being Program. The authors report no conflict of interest. This article has been republished with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article. © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 823 This is demonstrated in studies that assess retirees’ life satisfac- (i.e., voluntariness of retirement, hopes and fears about health, tion (e.g., Pinquart & Schindler, 2007), well-being (e.g., Kubicek, finances, activities, and life quality; e.g., Braithwaite, Gibson, & Korunka, Raymo, & Hoonakker, 2011), happiness (e.g., Calvo, Bosly-Craft, 1986;Fry,2000;McGoldrick&Cooper,1994;Nguyen, Haverstick, & Sass, 2009), self-esteem (e.g., Reitzes, Mutran, & Tirrito, & Barkley, 2014; Taylor, Goldberg, Shore, & Lipka, 2008; Fernandez, 1996) and overall perceptions of adjustment (e.g., Virshup & Coombs, 1993)andsocial ties (Hong & Duff, 1997; Donaldson, Earl, & Muratore, 2010). Unsurprisingly, given that Kupperbusch, Levenson, & Ebling, 2003;Moen,Kim,& retirement is also intertwined with ageing (e.g., Feldman & Beehr, Hofmeister, 2001;Myers&Booth,1996; Reitzes & Mutran, 2004). 2011), similar constructs have also been identified as indicators In the case of social ties, which are the focus of the present of successful ageing in general (e.g., Bowling, 2007). paper, previous research has tended to emphasize the impor- In this context, numerous theories have been developed to tance of individual relationships with one or more significant account for retirement adjustment (e.g., Stage, Life Course and others – typically a spouse or partner, children, friends, and Resource-based theories; see Wang, Henkens, & van Solinge, neighbours. However, the evidence here is mixed. There is 2011, for a discussion). However, two – Role Theory and some suggestion, for example, that being in a marital partnership Continuity Theory – are especially relevant to the present can enhance adjustment, primarily where relationships are sup- investigation which focuses on the particular importance of portive and of high quality (e.g., Kim & Moen, 2001; Price & Joo, social relationships and their contribution to a person’s self- 2005; Taylor et al., 2008; Wong & Earl, 2009). Yet, other studies definition in periods of life change. either do not find the effect (Dorfman, 1995;Kim&Feldman, Role Theory was originally developed to account for the 2000; Pinquart & Schindler, 2007;Price&Joo,2005)orfind impact of life transitions in general (Linton, 1936) and has gender differences in experiences of adjustment between mar- since been applied specifically to the retirement context. It ital partners. Along these lines, several studies report that men argues that retirement results in loss of a person’s work role experience a longer “honeymoon” phase as they move into and that this tends to have negative consequences when that retirement, as evidenced by higher morale and life satisfaction role is integral to their self-definition. However, it suggests (Kim & Moen, 2002) as well as reduced depressive symptoms that such consequences are not inevitable where other roles (Szinovacz & Davey, 2004). There are also gender differences in assume greater importance (e.g., as grandparent or friend)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Obedience to Authority”: from Blind Conformity to Engaged Followership
    LS13CH05-Haslam ARI 19 September 2017 7:37 Annual Review of Law and Social Science 50 Years of “Obedience to Authority”: From Blind Conformity to Engaged Followership S. Alexander Haslam1 and Stephen D. Reicher2 1School of Psychology, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia; email: [email protected] 2School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St. Andrews, Fife, KY16 9JP United Kingdom Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 2017. 13:59–78 Keywords The Annual Review of Law and Social Science is Milgram, obedience, conformity, authority, identification, followership online at lawsocsci.annualreviews.org https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci- Abstract 110316-113710 Despite being conducted half a century ago, Stanley Milgram’s studies of Copyright c 2017 by Annual Reviews. ⃝ obedience to authority remain the most well-known, most controversial, and Access provided by 202.90.207.98 on 10/17/17. For personal use only. All rights reserved most important in social psychology. Yet in recent years, increased scrutiny has served to question the integrity of Milgram’s research reports, the va- Annu. Rev. Law. Soc. Sci. 2017.13:59-78. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org lidity of his explanation of the phenomena he reported, and the broader relevance of his research to processes of collective harm-doing. We review these debates and argue that the main problem with received understand- ings of Milgram’s work arises from seeing it as an exploration of obedience. Instead, we argue that it is better understood as providing insight into pro- cesses of engaged followership, in which people are prepared to harm others because they identify with their leaders’ cause and believe their actions to be virtuous.
    [Show full text]
  • Can We Still Use Milgram's 'Obedience to Authority' Experiments to Explain Mass Atrocities After the Op
    JPR Milgram Revisited: Can we still use Milgram’s ‘Obedience to Authority’ Experiments to Explain Mass Atrocities after the Opening of the Archives? Review Essay Alette Smeulers Introduction ilgram’s ‘obedience to authority experiments’ are, together with Zimbardo’s prison experiment, one of the most famous but also most controversial studies ever conducted.1 Since its first publication in 1963, Milgram’s Mresearch has drawn the attention not only of scholars but also of the media, and the experiment as well as the results have been widely debated and referenced, but also heavily criticized.2 The 50th anniversary of his experiments and the opening of the Yale archives led to a new wave of publications and criticism. A lot of material on the Milgram experiments which until then had been hidden from scholarly and public scrutiny cast serious doubts on Milgram’s actual findings and their relevance.3 Between 2011 and 2015, no fewer than four internation- al peer-reviewed journals published a special issue on Milgram’s experiments: The Psychologist in 2011, edited by Reicher and Haslam; Theoretical & Applied Ethics in 2013, edited by Herara; the Journal of Social Issues in 2014, edited by Reicher, Haslam and Miller; and Theory & Psychology in 2015, edited by Brannigan, Nicholson and Cherry. In addition, Gina Perry published a book on the Milgram experiments in 2012 entitled Behind the Shock Machine: The Untold Story of the Notorious I wish to thank Maria Ioannou, Chris Atkinson, George Smeulers, Nicola Quaedvlieg, and the editors of the journal for their useful suggestions, comments and corrections. 1 Stanley Milgram, Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View (New York: Harper and Row, 1974); Philip G.
    [Show full text]
  • Making 'Us' Better: High-Quality Athlete Leadership Relates to Health and Burnout in Professional Au
    European Journal of Sport Science ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tejs20 Making ‘us’ better: High-quality athlete leadership relates to health and burnout in professional Australian football teams Katrien Fransen , S. Alexander Haslam , Niklas K. Steffens , Clifford J. Mallett , Kim Peters & Filip Boen To cite this article: Katrien Fransen , S. Alexander Haslam , Niklas K. Steffens , Clifford J. Mallett , Kim Peters & Filip Boen (2020) Making ‘us’ better: High-quality athlete leadership relates to health and burnout in professional Australian football teams, European Journal of Sport Science, 20:7, 953-963, DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2019.1680736 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2019.1680736 Published online: 27 Oct 2019. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 375 View related articles View Crossmark data Citing articles: 3 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tejs20 European Journal of Sport Science, 2020 Vol. 20, No. 7, 953–963, https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2019.1680736 Making ‘us’ better: High-quality athlete leadership relates to health and burnout in professional Australian football teams KATRIEN FRANSEN 1, S. ALEXANDER HASLAM 2, NIKLAS K. STEFFENS 2, CLIFFORD J. MALLETT3, KIM PETERS 2, & FILIP BOEN 1 1Department of Movement Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; 2School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia & 3School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia Abstract Overtraining, exhaustion, and burnout are widely recognized problems amongst elite athletes. The present research addresses this issue by exploring the extent to which high-quality athlete leadership is associated with elite athletes’ health and burnout.
    [Show full text]
  • Consensus Statement on the Stanford Prison Experiment and BBC Prison Study Professors Craig Haney, Alex Haslam, Stephen Reicher, and Philip Zimbardo
    Consensus Statement on the Stanford Prison Experiment and BBC Prison Study Professors Craig Haney, Alex Haslam, Stephen Reicher, and Philip Zimbardo We, the undersigned researchers who conducted the Stanford Prison Experiment (Philip Zimbardo and Craig Haney) and BBC Prison Study (Alex Haslam and Stephen Reicher), recognize that our studies, results, and public statements have engendered strong debate and, at times, misunderstanding within and beyond psychology. In an effort to promote constructive scientific dialogue, we are therefore releasing this consensus statement to highlight common ground and clarify our views on the research in question. First, we Jointly believe that it is critically important to develop a scientific understanding of toxic human behavior, including brutality and the abuse of authority and power. Second, we regard the Stanford Prison Experiment and BBC Prison Study as valid studies and valuable resources for advancing such understanding. At the same time, we recognize that both investigations have methodological limitations and are best viewed as one-trial demonstration studies rather than traditional experiments. Third, the BBC Prison Study differs from the Stanford Prison Experiment in essential ways and is not a direct replication of the earlier study. We do, however, see value in comparing the different outcomes of the two studies (and others) as a means of advancing conceptual understanding. Fourth, the behaviors observed in the Stanford Prison Experiment and BBC Prison Study were a function of many factors, including roles, norms, leadership, social identification, group pressure, and individual differences, not all of which are necessarily mutually exclusive. It is only natural that explanations of social behavior will be complex and multifactorial.
    [Show full text]
  • Debate Around Leadership in the Stanford Prison Experiment: Reply to Zimbardo and Haney (2020) and Chan Et Al
    American Psychologist © 2020 American Psychological Association 2020, Vol. 75, No. 3, 406–407 ISSN: 0003-066X http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000627 REPLY Debate Around Leadership in the Stanford Prison Experiment: Reply to Zimbardo and Haney (2020) and Chan et al. (2020) Stephen D. Reicher Jay J. Van Bavel University of St. Andrews New York University S. Alexander Haslam University of Queensland Access to the Stanford University archive has revealed new material that makes it possible to debate the precise nature and causes of events in the Stanford Prison Experiment. What the authors see as important is that these materials show the experimenters engaged in processes of identity leadership, which encouraged guard cruelty by presenting it as necessary for the achievement of noble collective goals. However, the authors encourage students, teachers, and researchers to engage with this new material themselves to explore alternative perspec- tives on what actually occurred in the study. Keywords: leadership, followership, social identification, Stanford Prison Experiment, open science Two decades ago, when we were planning our BBC of the SPE. This concerns what Moscovici (1976) identified Prison Study (Reicher & Haslam, 2006), we argued for the as a general conformity bias in social psychology. The focus resumption of normal scientific debate around the Stanford in the SPE, as elsewhere, was on the ways in which people Prison Experiment (SPE; Haney, Banks, & Zimbardo, conform to expectations (in this case, role expectations), to 1973). In particular, we sought to invigorate discussion the exclusion of acts of nonconformity. Yet even from the around the critical question of what can lead ordinary hu- limited material then available, there was considerable ev- mans to act in extraordinarily inhumane ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Identity Pathways Associated with Divergent Traumatic Responses
    European Review of Social Psychology ISSN: 1046-3283 (Print) 1479-277X (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/pers20 The social psychology of responses to trauma: social identity pathways associated with divergent traumatic responses Orla T. Muldoon, S. Alexander Haslam, Catherine Haslam, Tegan Cruwys, Michelle Kearns & Jolanda Jetten To cite this article: Orla T. Muldoon, S. Alexander Haslam, Catherine Haslam, Tegan Cruwys, Michelle Kearns & Jolanda Jetten (2019) The social psychology of responses to trauma: social identity pathways associated with divergent traumatic responses, European Review of Social Psychology, 30:1, 311-348 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2020.1711628 © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Published online: 10 Jan 2020. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 395 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=pers20 EUROPEAN REVIEW OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 2020, VOL. 30, NO. 1, 311–348 https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2020.1711628 ARTICLE The social psychology of responses to trauma: social identity pathways associated with divergent traumatic responses Orla T. Muldoon a, S. Alexander Haslam b, Catherine Haslam b, Tegan Cruwys c, Michelle Kearns a,d and Jolanda Jetten b aCentre for Social Issues Research, Department of Psychology, University of Limerick, Limerick V94 T9PX, Ireland; bSchool of Psychology, McElwain Building University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia; cResearch School of Psychology, The Australian National University, 39 Science Road, ACT 0200, Australia; dInternational Rescue Committee, Freetown, Sierra Leone ABSTRACT Research in clinical psychology and social psychiatry has highlighted the impor- tance of social factors for outcomes following trauma.
    [Show full text]
  • *17 Haslam CV Small
    Curriculum Vitae S. Alexander HASLAM Professor of Psychology, Australian Laureate Fellow University of Queensland Date of Birth December, 1962 Academic Qualifications 1985 M.A. Hons (first class), Psychology University of St Andrews 1991 PhD, Psychology Macquarie University PhD title: Social Comparative Context, Self-Categorization and Stereotyping Supervisor: J. C. Turner Main Research areas Psychology in organizations — with an emphasis on the contribution of social identity to leadership, motivation, communication, decision-making, negotiation, and productivity. The social psychology of stereotyping, prejudice, and tyranny — exploring the role of group processes in the dynamics of intergroup relations and conflict. Social processes in health and well-being — looking at the contribution of group life to stress, coping and well-being, especially in vulnerable populations. Research methodology — focusing on issues of research design, ethics, and uncertainty management. Previous Appointments 2/1990 – 2/1991 Lecturer, Department of Behavioural Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney 3/1991 – 2/2001 Research Officer, Lecturer, Senior Lecturer, Reader, School of Psychology, The Australian National University 3/2001 – 2012 Professor, School of Psychology, University of Exeter 8/2012 – present Professor and ARC Laureate Fellow, School of Psychology, University of Queensland Academic Awards and Distinctions 1982 Ferguson Prize and Class Medal for Psychology, University of St Andrews 1982 Lawson Prize and Class Medal for
    [Show full text]
  • RUNNING HEAD: Identification in Group Therapy Predictors of Social Identification in Group Therapy TEGAN CRUWYS 1 * NIKLAS K. ST
    RUNNING HEAD: Identification in group therapy Predictors of social identification in group therapy TEGAN CRUWYS 1 * NIKLAS K. STEFFENS 2 S. ALEXANDER HASLAM 2 CATHERINE HASLAM 2 MATTHEW J. HORNSEY 3 CRAIG MCGARTY 4 DANIEL P. SKORICH 2 Citation: Cruwys, T., Steffens, N. K., Haslam, S. A., Haslam, C., Hornsey, M. J., McGarty, C., & Skorich, D. P. (2020). Predictors of social identification in group therapy. Psychotherapy Research, 30(3), 348-361. 1. Research School of Psychology, Australian National University, CANBERRA ACT 2601 2. School of Psychology, University of Queensland, ST LUCIA QLD 4072 3. UQ Business School, ST LUCIA QLD 4072 4. School of Social Sciences and Psychology, Western Sydney University, PENRITH NSW 2751 *Corresponding author: 1. Dr Tegan Cruwys, [email protected] Research School of Psychology, Australian National University, CANBERRA ACT 2601 AUSTRALIA Acknowledgements: This project was supported by funding from the Australian Research Council (DE160100592 and FL110100199). The funder had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, writing, or decision to publish. We are grateful for the support of Genevieve A. Dingle, Nicole Fox, Hayley McMahon and Tian P. S. Oei. IDENTIFICATION IN GROUP THERAPY | 2 Abstract Background: Group therapy is a popular and effective format for psychological intervention, and both anecdotal and empirical data consistently point to group dynamics as a primary driver of its benefits. However, to date there has been no systematic investigation of what facilitates an engaged, cohesive group environment. We argue that this is social identification and explore the features of groups that help to build this. Method: We present two longitudinal studies of group therapy and examine the predictors of social identification.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Identification-Building Interventions to Improve Health: a Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis
    Health Psychology Review ISSN: 1743-7199 (Print) 1743-7202 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rhpr20 Social identification-building interventions to improve health: a systematic review and meta- analysis Niklas K. Steffens, Crystal J. LaRue, Catherine Haslam, Zoe C. Walter, Tegan Cruwys, Katie A. Munt, S. Alexander Haslam, Jolanda Jetten & Mark Tarrant To cite this article: Niklas K. Steffens, Crystal J. LaRue, Catherine Haslam, Zoe C. Walter, Tegan Cruwys, Katie A. Munt, S. Alexander Haslam, Jolanda Jetten & Mark Tarrant (2019): Social identification-building interventions to improve health: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Health Psychology Review, DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2019.1669481 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2019.1669481 View supplementary material Accepted author version posted online: 17 Sep 2019. Published online: 07 Oct 2019. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 178 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rhpr20 HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2019.1669481 Social identification-building interventions to improve health: a systematic review and meta-analysis Niklas K. Steffens a, Crystal J. LaRue a, Catherine Haslam a, Zoe C. Walter a, Tegan Cruwys b, Katie A. Munta, S. Alexander Haslam a, Jolanda Jetten a and Mark Tarrantc aSchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; bResearch School of Psychology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia; cUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY There is growing evidence that social identity processes play an important Received 9 May 2019 role in a range of health outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Psychology of Tyranny: the BBC Prison Study
    TYRANNYTHE PSYCHOLOGY OF POWER CORRUPTS, AND ABSOLUTE POWER CORRUPTS ABSOLUTELY—OR DOES IT? BY S. ALEXANDER HASLAM AND STEPHEN D. REICHER Images of inhumanity and atrocity are burned into our memories. Jewish men, women and children being herded into gas chambers. Entire villages destroyed by rampaging gangs in Rwanda. The systematic use of rape and the destruction of communities as part of “ethnic cleansing” in the Balkans. The massacre at My Lai in South Vietnam, the abuse of Iraqi prisoners in Abu Ghraib, and most re- cently, the carnage wrought by suicide bombers in Baghdad, Jerusalem, London and Madrid. Refl ecting on these events, we inevitably ask: What makes people so brutal? Are they mentally ill? Are they the products of dysfunctional families or cultures? Or, more disturbingly, is anyone capable of taking part in collective ruthlessness given the right—or rather, the wrong—circumstances? Now the latest research, including possibly the largest social-psychology experiment in three CREDIT CREDIT decades, is providing a new window on these conundrums. 44 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN MIND COPYRIGHT 2005 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC. COPYRIGHT 2005 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC. Joseph Stalin, Questions about why groups can behave bad- early 1960s by Stanley Milgram. Ordinary, well- Adolf Hitler, ly have driven some of the most signifi cant devel- adjusted males who took part in a bogus memo- Idi Amin and opments in social psychology in the 60 years ry experiment were told to deliver electric shocks Saddam Hussein since World War II ended. Starting with the need of increasing magnitude to another person who had powerful to understand the psychological processes that posed as the learner.
    [Show full text]
  • Just Obeying Orders?
    OPINION THE BIG IDEA Just obeying orders? Ordinary people can commit atrocities simply by following orders, iconic experiments from the 1960s concluded. But this notion of the “banality of evil” is wrong, argue psychologists Alexander Haslam and Stephen Reicher S oto AGNUM PH AGNUM M RICK ZACHMANN/RICK T PA 28 | NewScientist | 13 September 2014 For more opinion articles, visit newscientist.com/opinion IF YOU only know about one research NAZIS AND THE banaLITY OF EVIL programme in psychology, chances are it is Stanley Milgram’s “shock experiments”. In 1961, Adolf Eichmann, one of main lesson to be gleaned passive pen-pusher. Rather, he Conducted in the early 1960s at Yale the chief architects of the “final from his life was one of “the was a committed Nazi who took University, the participants were asked by an solution to the Jewish question”, fearsome, word-and-thought- on organisational challenges “Experimenter” to take on the role of “Teacher” was sentenced to death for the defying banality of evil”. with fervour and imagination. and administer an escalating series of electric murder of millions of people in Yet while this concept of the If he thought orders were not shocks to a “Learner” in the next room when Nazi extermination camps. banality of evil proved highly sufficiently “on message” he he chose the wrong answers in a memory test. Prior to his trial he had been influential – not least because would disobey them, and where This was supposedly part of a study into the portrayed in the media and by it gelled closely with Stanley none had been given, as was effect of punishment on learning.
    [Show full text]
  • Shared Social Identity in Leadership Stephen D Reicher School Of
    Shared social identity in leadership Stephen D Reicher School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St. Andrews S. Alexander Haslam School of Psychology, University of Queensland Michael J Platow School of Psychology, Australian National University Address for correspondence: Stephen Reicher; [email protected] Abstract In this paper we review recent evidence on the social identity model of leadership. First, we explain how this model is rooted in the social identity approach in social psychology and, specifically, the notion that shared reality and joint action in groups derives from shared social identity. We then show how effective leadership is a process of social identity management and we examine both the antecedents, the psychological and the political consequences of managing social identities Keywords: Leadership; social identity; group processes; shared reality; identity management; entrepreneurs of identity The group context of leadership Approaches to leadership differ in the breadth of their analytical focus. The trait approach1 concentrates on the characteristics of the leader alone. Transactional2 and transformational3,4 approaches broaden this out to address the relationships between leaders and followers. The social identity model of leadership5,6,7 extends the focus still further. It starts from the premise that a leader is always the leader of some specific constituency: a political party, a religion, a country or whatever. Accordingly, it argues that leadership should be understood in terms of the relations between the leader and followers within a particular social group8. It follows that an understanding of leadership depends upon an understanding of group processes more generally. The social identity approach in social psychology — comprised of social identity theory9 and self-categorization theory10 — argues that group behavior is underpinned by a sense of social identity (or ‘we-ness’) that is shared by a given a set of people.
    [Show full text]