(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,569,224 B2 Kerfoot Et Al

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,569,224 B2 Kerfoot Et Al USOO6569224B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,569,224 B2 Kerfoot et al. (45) Date of Patent: *May 27, 2003 (54) HYDROMETALLURGICAL PROCESS FOR (51) Int. Cl." ................................................ C22B 15/00 THE RECOVERY OF NICKEL AND COBALT (52) U.S. Cl. ............................. 75/743; 423/27; 423/28; VALUES FROMA SULFDC FLOTATION 423/150.1 CONCENTRATE (58) Field of Search ......................... 75/743; 423/150.1, (75) Inventors: Derek George Eagland Kerfoot, 423/27, 28 Oakville (CA); Eberhard Krause, (56) References Cited Campbellville (CA); Bruce John Love, Georgetown (CA); Avinash Singhal, U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS Mississauga (CA) 6,428,604 B1 8/2002 Kerfoot et al. ............... 75/743 (73) Assignee: Inco Limited, Toronto (CA) * cited by examiner (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this Primary Examiner Roy King patent is extended or adjusted under 35 ASSistant Examiner Andrew Wessman U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Edward A. Steen This patent is Subject to a terminal dis (57) ABSTRACT claimer. A hydrometallurgical process for the recovery of nickel and cobalt values from a Sulfidic flotation concentrate. The (21) Appl. No.: 10/175,023 process involves forming a slurry of the Sulfidic flotation concentrate in an acid Solution, and Subjecting the slurried (22) Filed: Jun. 19, 2002 flotation concentrate to a chlorine leach at atmospheric (65) Prior Publication Data preSSure followed by an oxidative pressure leach. After liquid-Solids Separation and purification of the concentrate US 2003/0033906 A1 Feb. 20, 2003 resulting in the removal of copper and cobalt, the nickel containing Solution is directly treated by electrowinning to Related U.S. Application Data recover nickel cathode therefrom. (63) Continuation of application No. 09/664,475, filed on Sep. 18, 2000, now Pat. No. 6,428,604. 1 Claim, 3 Drawing Sheets U.S. Patent May 27, 2003 Sheet 1 of 3 US 6,569,224 B2 Fig. 1 10 Ni-Co Concentrate - > ATMOSPHERIC Cl, LEACH Oxygen w w PRESSURE LEACH LIGRUD/SOLID Leach SEPARATION Re NiSOLUTION - - S. PURIFICATION n, NICKEL H-Ho- Solution E. ELECTROWNNING nano Bleed Nickel Cathode U.S. Patent May 27, 2003 Sheet 2 of 3 US 6,569,224 B2 Fig. 2 Ni-Co Concentrate FNE GRIND 12 w - 14 ATMOSPHERIC ACID CLEACH 30 Oxygen 41 OxIDATIVE PRESSURE LEACH Leach Residue COPPER T Copper REMOVAL By-Product Limestone 22 Lime Iron-Gypsum Cake w 24 SOLUTION --> Waste PURIFICATION Solution 26 w COBALT --> Cobalt 32 REMOVA Product w 28 M 34 NICKEL -O Solution Oxygen + ELECTROWINNING A. Anolyte Bleed Chlorine w 30 Nickel Cathode U.S. Patent May 27, 2003 Sheet 3 of 3 US 6,569,224 B2 Fig. 3 9. 40 9 E C 3 30 1 / g f f 8 f/ if D / 5 20 . h ()5 * , ff Direct OPL of Ni-Cu-Co Concentrate ?o - - - - - OPL of Test 4 Atm. Leach Residue 10 - - - OPL of Test 5 Atm. Leach Residue O 5 10 15 20 25 30 Time, minutes US 6,569,224 B2 1 2 HYDROMETALLURGICAL PROCESS FOR at a loSS, or converted to a Solid waste Such as gypsum for THE RECOVERY OF NICKEL AND COBALT landfill disposal. VALUES FROMA SULFDC FLOTATION There have been numerous attempts to extend this oxi CONCENTRATE dative acid pressure leaching technology to the direct treat ment of copper and nickel-copper Sulfide flotation CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED concentrates, but no Such process has as yet been Success APPLICATION fully commercialized. A major obstacle to the application of oxidative pressure leaching at temperatures above the melt This application is a continuation of U.S. patent applica ing point of Sulfur, to the treatment of chalcopyrite tion Ser. No. 09/664,475 filed Sep. 18, 2000 now U.S. Pat. containing flotation concentrates, has been the tendency of No. 6,428,604. molten Sulfur to coat the Surface of the metal Sulfide par ticles. This inhibits and prevents the reaction of the metal FIELD OF THE INVENTION Sulfide with the acid Solution. Consequently, the oxidative The present invention relates to a hydrometallurgical preSSure leaching of copper concentrates in Sulfuric acid at proceSS for the Separation, extraction and recovery of nickel 15 temperatures above 120° C. typically results in slow reaction and cobalt values from a sulfidic flotation concentrate. More rates and low metal eXtractions. Zinc and nickel Sulfide Specifically, the process involves an atmospheric pressure particles have a weaker affinity for molten sulfur than do chlorine leach conducted under acidic conditions, followed copper Sulfides, and the Successful Zinc oxidative preSSure by an oxidative acid preSSure leach, and recovery of nickel leach proceSS described above utilizes organic additives, by an electrowinning Step. Such as lignoSulfonate Salts or quebracho, to prevent the coating of the Sulfide particles during the leaching process. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION These additives are ineffective for copper sulfide concentrates, but recently, (see U.S. Pat. No. 5,730,776 to Metallurgists have long Sought to develop economically Collins et al.), the addition of low grade coals has been viable hydrometallurgical processes for the recovery of base 25 found to prevent the coating of both Zinc and copper Sulfides metals from Sulfidic flotation concentrates, as an alternative in oxidative pressure leaching in Sulfuric acid Solution at to the conventional Smelting and refining processes. Smelt 150° C. erS have become increasingly costly to build and to operate A different approach to overcoming the problem of the as a result of more Stringent environmental emission con occlusion of the Sulfide particle Surfaces by molten Sulfur is trols. Many of the processes Studied over the past fifty years described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,039,406 to Stanley et al. This have utilized the leaching of an aqueous Slurry of the Sulfidic patent discloses the addition of low concentrations of chlo flotation concentrate in an air or oxygen atmosphere in a ride ion to the leach Solution in the oxidative preSSure preSSure autoclave, to achieve the primary Separation of the leaching of a chalcopyrite concentrate in Sulfuric acid Solu metal values from the iron, Sulfur and gangue components of tion at temperatures above 120° C. The benefits of the the concentrate. Few of these processes have achieved 35 chloride addition were shown to be greatly increased rates of commercial Success. leaching of chalcopyrite and a major reduction in the amount A hydrometallurgical proceSS based on the pressure leach of Sulfide oxidized to Sulfate, and as a result, the recovery of ing of nickel-copper Sulfide flotation concentrates in ammo Virtually all the iron content of the concentrate as hematite niacal ammonium Sulfate Solution in an atmosphere of air at in the Solid residue. In the absence of the chloride ion 95 C., was commercialized by Sherritt Gordon Mines 40 addition, oxidative pressure leaching of chalcopyrite in Limited in Canada in the early 1950s. (J. R. Boldt, Jr. and P. sulfuric acid at 150° C. typically produces a leach solution E. Queneau, The Winning of Nickel, Longmans Canada containing high levels of acid and dissolved iron. With the Limited, Toronto, 1967, pp. 299-314), and was operated chloride addition, the leach Solution typically has a pH value Successfully for forty years. Due to its relatively high energy of 2.5 to 3, and the iron concentration is less than 1 g/L. A consumption, and the necessity for providing a market for 45 further consequence of the low degree of Sulfur oxidation, the ammonium Sulfate fertilizer by-product, this proceSS has and the resulting low level of acidity in the chloride con not been widely adopted by other nickel producers because taining leach Solution, is that a large portion of the leached it was particularly adapted to the general location and copper can be reprecipitated as basic copper Sulfate. The available feedstocks of the Sherritt Gordon plant. extent of this effect can be varied by adjusting the amount of A Sulfuric acid based pressure leaching process for the 50 acid added to the leach. This ability to control the deport treatment of Zinc Sulfide flotation concentrates has also been ment of the copper between Solution and leach residue in Successful commercial operation Since 1981 and has provides considerable flexibility in the design of the copper Subsequently been adopted by Several Zinc producers to recovery process. replace the conventional roasting technology. In this The applicability of oxidative pressure leaching with a process, the Zinc Sulfide flotation concentrate is oxidatively 55 chloride ion addition to a Sulfate Solution in the preSSure pressure leached in a sulfuric acid solution at 150° C., to leaching of nickel-containing Sulfide flotation concentrates produce a Solution of Zinc Sulfate, and a residue consisting was Subsequently described in a paper entitled "Oxygen of elemental Sulfur and iron oxide. The Zinc sulfate Solution Pressure Leaching of Fe-Ni-Cu Sulfide Concentrates at is purified to remove trace impurity metals, and Zinc metal 110 C-Effect of Low Chloride Addition” Subramanian et is recovered from the purified leach Solution by the long 60 al. (Hydrometallurgy 2, (1976), pp. 117-125). established electrowinning process. Typically less than 10% More recently, D. L. Jones in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,431,788; of the Sulfide in the concentrate is oxidized to Sulfate in the 5,645,708; 5,650,057; 5,855,858; 5,874,055; and 5,902,474 preSSure leach, with the balance being recovered as elemen discloses the combination of the chloride-assisted Sulfuric tal Sulfur in Solid form, for Sale or Storage. The deportment acid oxidative preSSure leaching of copper Sulfide concen of the Sulfur in this proceSS gives it a major advantage over 65 trates with the recovery of copper by a variety of process the older roasting process, in which the Sulfur is all con flowsheets based on conventional Solvent extraction and verted to Sulfuric acid, which must frequently be marketed electrowinning.
Recommended publications
  • Developing a Solvent Extraction Process for the Separation of Cobalt and Iron from Nickel Sulfate Solutions
    Abstract DEVELOPING A SOLVENT EXTRACTION PROCESS FOR THE SEPARATION OF COBALT AND IRON FROM NICKEL SULFATE SOLUTIONS By Michiel Casparus Olivier Thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ENGINEERING (EXTRACTIVE METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING) In the faculty of Engineering at Stellenbosch University Supervised by Christie Dorfling December 2011 i Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za DeclarationAbstract DECLARATION By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. …………………………… ………………. Signature Date Copyright © 2011 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved i Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Abstract ABSTRACT Crude NiSO4 solutions are often produced as a product of Sherrit based matte leach processes leading to iron and cobalt contaminated solutions of NiSO4. To upgrade the quality of these solutions for either, the production of NiSO4 crystals or cathode/precipitated nickel, the iron and cobalt must be removed. Conventional processes use either pure or saponified Cyanex 272 in solvent extraction to extract iron and cobalt from pregnant nickel leach solutions. These processes require the addition of an alkali like NaOH to neutralise the protons being exchanged for the different metal species since extraction is a strong function of pH. Hence, while removing iron and cobalt from the solution, sodium is added instead.
    [Show full text]
  • Sudibyo S, Et Al. Optimization of Electrometal-Elektrowinning Cobalt Process from the Slag Copyright© Sudibyo S, Et Al
    Physical Science & Biophysics Journal MEDWIN PUBLISHERS ISSN: 2641-9165 Committed to Create Value for Researchers Optimization of Electrometal-Elektrowinning Cobalt Process from the Slag of Nickel Pig Iron (NPI) Hermida L1, Sudibyo S2*, Supriyatna YI2, Herlina U2, Handoko AS2, Prasetyo E2, Almutaqii M2 and Reswari PA1 Research Article Volume 4 Issue 2 1Department of Chemical Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Lampung University, Indonesia Received Date: October 09, 2020 2Research Unit for Mineral Technology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI), Indonesia Published Date: October 27, 2020 *Corresponding author: Sudibyo Sudibyo, Research Unit for Mineral Technology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI), Ir. Sutami street Km. 15, Tanjung Bintang, South Lampung district, Lampung Province, Indonesia, Tel: +6285881020870; Email: [email protected] Abstract Slag from the manufacturing of nickel pig iron (NPI) from laterite soil is still containing 823.7 ppm of cobalt. In this research, the separation process is carried out from slag NPI by using the Response Surface Method (RSM). This method is to determine the optimum conditional process of Electrometal Electrowinning (EMEW) and get an equation model to see the correlation isbetween leach the a variable slag using and acetic know acid,the most and significantthen extracted interfactor in two interaction.steps by versatic This research acid 10 andwas thenconducted with cyanex using three 272. parameters,The organic phaseconsists from of duration this extraction of operation, then stripped potential using voltage, 6 M and sulphuric variable acid of boric so obtained acid. The aqueous first step phase in electro-metal at pH 5.5 with electrowinning the highest cobalt content. The best condition of electro-metal electrowinning is obtained at 4.5 V, 2 hours, and 0.5 M of boric acid with 45.8273% of cobalt recovery.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of the New Method for Oxidized Nickel Ore Processing
    NIOKR-2018 Theoretical and practical conference with international participation and School KnE Materials Science for young scientists «FERROALLOYS: Development prospects of metallurgy and machine building based on completed Research and Development» Volume 2019 Conference Paper Development of the New Method for Oxidized Nickel Ore Processing Boris Dmitrievich Khalezov, Oleg Vadimovich Zayakin, Alexey Sergeevich Gavrilov, and Vladimir Ivanovich Zhuchkov IMET UB RAS, Ekaterinburg, Russia Abstract In modern conditions of sharp fluctuations in nickel prices on world markets, the problem of profitability of processing Russian poor oxidized nickel ores (ONO) has arisen. As an alternative to the previously existing in Russia, a sulphidation-reducing smelting on a matte, a hydro-pyrometallurgical method has been proposed for the preparation of complex nickel-, chromium-, manganese-containing ferroalloys. At the first stage, hydrolytic precipitation (with sodium hydroxide) is considered as a method of processing production solutions from heap leaching of ONO. It is established that Corresponding Author: at pH = 5.5, Al is completely removed in the precipitate as hydroxide. After washing Oleg Vadimovich Zayakin from impurities and calcining, a concentrate containing 50 wt.% Al was obtained. At the [email protected] second stage, at pH = 9.5, more than 99% of nickel and cobalt oxides, as well as 92% Received: 5 February 2019 MnO and 46% MgO, are precipitated. Obtained after washing and calcination at 700∘C Accepted: 6 March 2019 oxide concentrate contains, by weight. %: 67 NiO; 3 CoO; 20 MnO; 9 MgO; 0,2 S. At the Published: 17 March 2019 third stage, a pyrometallurgical method for smelting complex ferroalloys of the Fe-Ni-Cr- Publishing services provided by Mn-Si system using refractory ferrosilicochrome as a reducing agent is proposed for the Knowledge E processing of nickel-containing concentrate.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on the Extraction and Separation of Zinc, Cobalt, and Nickel Using Ionquest 801, Cyanex 272, and Their Mixtures
    metals Article Study on the Extraction and Separation of Zinc, Cobalt, and Nickel Using Ionquest 801, Cyanex 272, and Their Mixtures Wensen Liu 1,2,3, Jian Zhang 3,4,5, Zhenya Xu 6, Jie Liang 1,* and Zhaowu Zhu 2,3,4,* 1 School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China; [email protected] 2 Innovation Academy for Green Manufacture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China 3 National Engineering Laboratory for Hydrometallurgical Cleaner Production Technology, Beijing 100190, China; [email protected] 4 Key Laboratory of Green Process and Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China 5 School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 6 The College of Chemical Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100028, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (J.L.); [email protected] (Z.Z.) Abstract: Both Cyanex 272 (bis (2,4,4-trimethylpentyl) phosphinic acid) and Ionquest 801 (2-ethylhexyl phosphonic acid mono-2-ethylhexyl ester) are commonly used for metal extraction and separation, particularly for zinc, cobalt, and nickel, which are often found together in processing solutions. Detailed metal extractions of zinc, cobalt, and nickel were studied in this paper using Cya-nex 272, Ionquest 801, and their mixtures. It was found that they performed very similarly in zinc selectivity over cobalt. Cyanex 272 performed much better than Ionquest 801 in cobalt separation from nickel. Citation: Liu, W.; Zhang, J.; Xu, Z.; However, very good separation of them was also obtained with Ionquest 801 at its low concentration Liang, J.; Zhu, Z.
    [Show full text]
  • Cobalt: Demand-Supply Balances in the Transition to Electric Mobility
    Cobalt: demand-supply balances in the transition to electric mobility Alves Dias P., Blagoeva D., Pavel C., Arvanitidis N. 2018 EUR 29381 EN This publication is a Technical report by the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Commission’s science and knowledge service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policymaking process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use that might be made of this publication. Contact information Name: Patrícia Alves Dias & Darina Blagoeva Address European Commission, Joint Research Centre, P.O. Box 2, NL-1755 ZG Petten, The Netherlands Email: [email protected] & [email protected] Tel.: +31 22456-5054 / +31 22456-5030 JRC Science Hub https://ec.europa.eu/jrc JRC112285 EUR 29381 EN PDF ISBN 978-92-79-94311-9 ISSN 1831-9424 doi:10.2760/97710 Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018 © European Union/European Atomic Energy Community, 2018 The reuse policy of the European Commission is implemented by Commission Decision 2011/833/EU of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. 39). Reuse is authorised, provided the source of the document is acknowledged and its original meaning or message is not distorted. The European Commission shall not be liable for any consequence stemming from the reuse. For any use or reproduction of photos or other material that is not owned by the EU, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders.
    [Show full text]
  • First Cobalt Refinery Engineering Report
    First Cobalt Refinery Project Ontario, Canada Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering (AACE) Class 3 Feasibility Study July 9, 2020 Prepared for: First Cobalt Corporation 401 Bay St., 6th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5H 2Y4 Prepared by: Ausenco Engineering Canada 855 Homer St., Vancouver, BC, V6C 2X8 This report was prepared to summarise the results of the feasibility study related to the First Cobalt Refinery Project. This report does not constitute a feasibility study within the definition employed by the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM), as it relates to a stand-along industrial project and does not concern a mineral project of First Cobalt. As a result, disclosure standards prescribed by National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (NI 43-101) are not applicable to the scientific and technical disclosure in this report. Any references to scoping study, prefeasibility study or feasibility study by First Cobalt, in relation to the Refinery Project, are not the same as terms defined by the CIM Definition Standards and used in NI 43-101. First Cobalt Refinery Project AACE Class 3 Feasibility Study 1 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Property Description & Location ............................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Infrastructure & Physiography .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Flotation of Mixed Oxide Sulphide Copper-Cobalt Minerals Using Xanthate, Dithiophosphate, Thiocarbamate and Blended Collectors
    ORE Open Research Exeter TITLE Flotation of mixed oxide sulphide copper-cobalt minerals using xanthate, dithiophosphate, thiocarbamate and blended collectors AUTHORS Tijsseling, L; Dehaine, Q; Rollinson, G; et al. JOURNAL Minerals Engineering DEPOSITED IN ORE 03 June 2019 This version available at http://hdl.handle.net/10871/37358 COPYRIGHT AND REUSE Open Research Exeter makes this work available in accordance with publisher policies. A NOTE ON VERSIONS The version presented here may differ from the published version. If citing, you are advised to consult the published version for pagination, volume/issue and date of publication Minerals Engineering 138 (2019) 246–256 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Minerals Engineering journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/mineng Flotation of mixed oxide sulphide copper-cobalt minerals using xanthate, T dithiophosphate, thiocarbamate and blended collectors ⁎ L.T. Tijsseling, Q. Dehaine, G.K. Rollinson, H.J. Glass University of Exeter, Camborne School of Mines, Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9FE, United Kingdom ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: More than half of the global cobalt supply from primary sources is currently produced in the Democratic Mixed oxide sulphide ore Republic of Congo (DRC) from ores containing copper-cobalt oxides or copper-cobalt sulphides. Where oxide and Flotation sulphide cobalt-bearing copper minerals occur together, efficient recovery of copper and cobalt is known tobe Copper extremely difficult. This study investigates the flotation behaviour of a mixed oxide-sulphide ore wherecopperis Cobalt hosted in sulphides phases such as bornite, chalcopyrite and chalcocite, and oxide phases such as malachite and QEMSCAN to a lesser extent chrysocolla. Three cobalt-bearing oxide minerals are observed in the mixed ore, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Nickel Products
    energies Article Energy Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Nickel Products Wenjing Wei 1,2,*, Peter B. Samuelsson 1 , Anders Tilliander 1, Rutger Gyllenram 1,2 and Pär G. Jönsson 1 1 Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology, 114 28 Stockholm, Sweden; [email protected] (P.B.S.); [email protected] (A.T.); [email protected] (R.G.); [email protected] (P.G.J.) 2 Kobolde &Partners AB, Ringvägen 100, 118 60 Stockholm, Sweden * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 25 September 2020; Accepted: 26 October 2020; Published: 29 October 2020 Abstract: The primary energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions from nickel smelting products have been assessed through case studies using a process model based on mass and energy balance. The required primary energy for producing nickel metal, nickel oxide, ferronickel, and nickel pig iron is 174 GJ/t alloy (174 GJ/t contained Ni), 369 GJ/t alloy (485 GJ/t contained Ni), 110 GJ/t alloy (309 GJ/t contained Ni), and 60 GJ/t alloy (598 GJ/t contained Ni), respectively. Furthermore, the associated GHG emissions are 14 tCO2-eq/t alloy (14 tCO2-eq/t contained Ni), 30 t CO2-eq/t alloy (40 t CO2-eq/t contained Ni), 6 t CO2-eq/t alloy (18 t CO2-eq/t contained Ni), and 7 t CO2-eq/t alloy (69 t CO2-eq/t contained Ni). A possible carbon emission reduction can be observed by comparing ore type, ore grade, and electricity source, as well as allocation strategy. The suggested process model overcomes the limitation of a conventional life cycle assessment study which considers the process as a ‘black box’ and allows for an identification of further possibilities to implement sustainable nickel production.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Biohydrometallurgical Metals Extraction from Polymetallic Mineral Resources
    Minerals 2015, 5, 1-60; doi:10.3390/min5010001 OPEN ACCESS minerals ISSN 2075-163X www.mdpi.com/journal/minerals Review Review of Biohydrometallurgical Metals Extraction from Polymetallic Mineral Resources Helen R. Watling CSIRO Mineral Resources Flagship, PO Box 7229, Karawara, WA 6152, Australia; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-8-9334-8034; Fax: +61-8-9334-8001 Academic Editor: Karen Hudson-Edwards Received: 30 October 2014 / Accepted: 10 December 2014 / Published: 24 December 2014 Abstract: This review has as its underlying premise the need to become proficient in delivering a suite of element or metal products from polymetallic ores to avoid the predicted exhaustion of key metals in demand in technological societies. Many technologies, proven or still to be developed, will assist in meeting the demands of the next generation for trace and rare metals, potentially including the broader application of biohydrometallurgy for the extraction of multiple metals from low-grade and complex ores. Developed biotechnologies that could be applied are briefly reviewed and some of the difficulties to be overcome highlighted. Examples of the bioleaching of polymetallic mineral resources using different combinations of those technologies are described for polymetallic sulfide concentrates, low-grade sulfide and oxidised ores. Three areas for further research are: (i) the development of sophisticated continuous vat bioreactors with additional controls; (ii) in situ and in stope bioleaching and the need to solve problems associated with microbial activity in that scenario; and (iii) the exploitation of sulfur-oxidising microorganisms that, under specific anaerobic leaching conditions, reduce and solubilise refractory iron(III) or manganese(IV) compounds containing multiple elements.
    [Show full text]
  • COBALT by Kim B
    COBALT By Kim B. Shedd Cobalt is a strategic and critical metal used NDS cobalt inventory down to 18,300 metric production. Shipments are defined as sales, in many diverse industrial and military tons (40.4 million pounds) as set in the U.S. transfers, or consumption to make end-use applications. The largest use of cobalt is in Department of Defense 1992 Report to the products such as paint driers and catalysts. In superalloys, which are alloys designed to resist Congress on National Defense Stockpile 1994, shipments by U.S. processors included stress and corrosion at high temperatures. Requirements. Approximately 181 tons 1,730 tons of cobalt oxide and hydroxide, Superalloys are used in turbine engine parts for (400,000 pounds) of cobalt granules was inorganic cobalt compounds, and organic cobalt aircraft jet engines and land-based industrial available on the second Wednesday of each compounds, a slight decrease from 1993 gas turbines. Cobalt is also used to make month and 68 tons (150,000 pounds) of cobalt shipments of 1,790 tons. Two processors made magnets for a wide range of motors, meters, and rondelles was available on the fourth extra-fine cobalt metal powder in the United devices; corrosion and wear-resistant alloys for Wednesday of each month. The DLA made States. Carolmet, owned by Union Minière hardfacing and castings; and high speed steels awards at prices close to those quoted by Metal S.A. of Belgium, made cobalt metal powder for cutting tools. Cobalt metal powder acts as a Bulletin for 99.3% cobalt. from imported primary metal at its Laurinburg, binder in cemented carbides and diamond tools, The DLA sold 1,800 tons of cobalt during NC, plant.
    [Show full text]
  • Solvent Extraction of Cobalt and Zinc from Sulphate Solutions Using Phosphoric, Phosphonic and Phosphinic Acids
    The European Journal of Mineral Processing and Environmental Protection Vol.3, No.2, 1303-0868, 2003, pp. 151-159 Solvent extraction of cobalt and zinc from sulphate solutions using phosphoric, phosphonic and phosphinic acids K.C. Nathsarma* and P.V.R. Bhaskara Sarma Hydrometallurgy Division, Regional Research Laboratory Bhubaneswar-751 013, Orissa, India Received 10 April 2002; accepted 15 January 2003 ABSTRACT Extraction and separation of cobalt and zinc was studied from a sulphate solution using NaD2EHPA, NaPC88A and NaCyanex 272 of 0.04M concentration. The percentage extraction and DZn values increased with increasing equilibrium pH. Of the three extractants studied, NaD2EHPA was found to be the most suitable extractant for the separation of metal ions. Separation factor for cobalt and zinc increased with increasing equilibrium pH and was the highest (3394) at pH 5.65. Quantitative extraction (at equal phase ratio) and stripping (at A:O=1:5) of zinc could be achieved in two counter-current stages. Between H2SO4 solution and zinc spent electrolyte (containing the same concentration of H2SO4), the former was found to be a better stripping agent for zinc. Extraction (>99%) of cobalt could be achieved in two counter current stages at equal phase ratio and the metal could be stripped quantitatively in two counter-current stages 3 from the loaded solvent with H2SO4 solution of 2.0kg/m concentration. © 2003 SDU. All rights reserved. Keywords: Solvent extraction; Cobalt; Zinc; Counter current simulation 1. INTRODUCTION Regional Research Laboratory, Bhubaneswar has developed a number of processes to extract metal values from manganese nodules of Indian Ocean origin.
    [Show full text]
  • Cobalt Recovery from Copper Leach Solutions
    PLEASE DO NOT RE , MOVE FROM LIBRA '. £ I'.] RY RI8927 , 2 n 27 % Bureau of Mines Report of Investigations/1985 Cobalt Recovery From Copper Leach Solutions By T. H. Jeffers and M. R. Harvey UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR r I Report of Investigations 8927 Cobalt Recovery From Copper Leach Solutions By T. H. Jeffers and M. R. Harvey UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Donald Paul Hodel, Secretary BUREAU OF MINES Robert C. Horton, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data: Jeffers, T. H. (Thomas H.) Cobalt recovery from copper leach solutions. (Report of investigations; 8927) Bibliography: p. 12. Supt. of Docs. no.: [28.23:8927. 1. Cobalt-Metallurgy., 2. Leaching. 3. Copper. 1. Harvey, M. R. (Malcolm R.). II. Title. III. Series: Report of investigations (United SUites. Bureau of Mines) ; 8927. TN23. U43 ['fN799. C6] 6228 [66H'. 733] 84·600288 " I l' CONTENTS Abstract .•••...••••...••..•••...••..•.•..•.... !t •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 1 Int roduc tion •••••••••• " ...................................................... 2 Description of the resource •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 3 Resin selection •••••••••••• I) ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• It ••••••••••• 3 Process description •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 4 Experimental results •••••••••••••••••••••• ~ •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 5 Ion exehange ••••••••••••••• it ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 5 I Res in loading ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
    [Show full text]