COBALT by Kim B
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Developing a Solvent Extraction Process for the Separation of Cobalt and Iron from Nickel Sulfate Solutions
Abstract DEVELOPING A SOLVENT EXTRACTION PROCESS FOR THE SEPARATION OF COBALT AND IRON FROM NICKEL SULFATE SOLUTIONS By Michiel Casparus Olivier Thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ENGINEERING (EXTRACTIVE METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING) In the faculty of Engineering at Stellenbosch University Supervised by Christie Dorfling December 2011 i Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za DeclarationAbstract DECLARATION By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. …………………………… ………………. Signature Date Copyright © 2011 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved i Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Abstract ABSTRACT Crude NiSO4 solutions are often produced as a product of Sherrit based matte leach processes leading to iron and cobalt contaminated solutions of NiSO4. To upgrade the quality of these solutions for either, the production of NiSO4 crystals or cathode/precipitated nickel, the iron and cobalt must be removed. Conventional processes use either pure or saponified Cyanex 272 in solvent extraction to extract iron and cobalt from pregnant nickel leach solutions. These processes require the addition of an alkali like NaOH to neutralise the protons being exchanged for the different metal species since extraction is a strong function of pH. Hence, while removing iron and cobalt from the solution, sodium is added instead. -
Sudibyo S, Et Al. Optimization of Electrometal-Elektrowinning Cobalt Process from the Slag Copyright© Sudibyo S, Et Al
Physical Science & Biophysics Journal MEDWIN PUBLISHERS ISSN: 2641-9165 Committed to Create Value for Researchers Optimization of Electrometal-Elektrowinning Cobalt Process from the Slag of Nickel Pig Iron (NPI) Hermida L1, Sudibyo S2*, Supriyatna YI2, Herlina U2, Handoko AS2, Prasetyo E2, Almutaqii M2 and Reswari PA1 Research Article Volume 4 Issue 2 1Department of Chemical Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Lampung University, Indonesia Received Date: October 09, 2020 2Research Unit for Mineral Technology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI), Indonesia Published Date: October 27, 2020 *Corresponding author: Sudibyo Sudibyo, Research Unit for Mineral Technology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI), Ir. Sutami street Km. 15, Tanjung Bintang, South Lampung district, Lampung Province, Indonesia, Tel: +6285881020870; Email: [email protected] Abstract Slag from the manufacturing of nickel pig iron (NPI) from laterite soil is still containing 823.7 ppm of cobalt. In this research, the separation process is carried out from slag NPI by using the Response Surface Method (RSM). This method is to determine the optimum conditional process of Electrometal Electrowinning (EMEW) and get an equation model to see the correlation isbetween leach the a variable slag using and acetic know acid,the most and significantthen extracted interfactor in two interaction.steps by versatic This research acid 10 andwas thenconducted with cyanex using three 272. parameters,The organic phaseconsists from of duration this extraction of operation, then stripped potential using voltage, 6 M and sulphuric variable acid of boric so obtained acid. The aqueous first step phase in electro-metal at pH 5.5 with electrowinning the highest cobalt content. The best condition of electro-metal electrowinning is obtained at 4.5 V, 2 hours, and 0.5 M of boric acid with 45.8273% of cobalt recovery. -
The Efficient Improvement of Original Magnetite in Iron Ore Reduction
minerals Article The Efficient Improvement of Original Magnetite in Iron Ore Reduction Reaction in Magnetization Roasting Process and Mechanism Analysis by In Situ and Continuous Image Capture Bing Zhao 1,2, Peng Gao 1,2,*, Zhidong Tang 1,2 and Wuzhi Zhang 1,2 1 School of Resources and Civil Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China; [email protected] (B.Z.); [email protected] (Z.T.); [email protected] (W.Z.) 2 National-Local Joint Engineering Research Center of High-Efficient Exploitation Technology for Refractory Iron Ore Resources, Shenyang 110819, China * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-024-8368-8920 Abstract: Magnetization roasting followed by magnetic separation is considered an effective method for recovering iron minerals. As hematite and magnetite are the main concomitant constituents in iron ores, the separation index after the magnetization roasting will be more optimized than with only hematite. In this research, the mechanism of the original magnetite improving iron ore reduction during the magnetization roasting process was explored using ore fines and lump ore samples. Under optimum roasting conditions, the iron grade increased from 62.17% to 65.22%, and iron recovery increased from 84.02% to 92.02% after separation, when Fe in the original magnetite content increased from 0.31% to 8.09%, although the Fe masses in each sample were equal. For lump ores with magnetite and hematite intergrowth, the method of in situ and continuous image capture Citation: Zhao, B.; Gao, P.; Tang, Z.; for microcrack generation and the evolution of the magnetization roasting process was innovatively Zhang, W. -
Recovery of Magnetite-Hematite Concentrate from Iron Ore Tailings
E3S Web of Conferences 247, 01042 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202124701042 ICEPP-2021 Recovery of magnetite-hematite concentrate from iron ore tailings Mikhail Khokhulya1,*, Alexander Fomin1, and Svetlana Alekseeva1 1Mining Institute of Kola Science Center of Russian Academy of Sciences, Apatity, 184209, Russia Abstract. The research is aimed at study of the probable recovery of iron from the tailings of the Olcon mining company located in the north-western Arctic zone of Russia. Material composition of a sample from a tailings dump was analysed. The authors have developed a separation production technology to recover magnetite-hematite concentrate from the tailings. A processing flowsheet includes magnetic separation, milling and gravity concentration methods. The separation technology provides for production of iron ore concentrate with total iron content of 65.9% and recovers 91.0% of magnetite and 80.5% of hematite from the tailings containing 20.4% of total iron. The proposed technology will increase production of the concentrate at a dressing plant and reduce environmental impact. 1 Introduction The mineral processing plant of the Olcon JSC, located at the Murmansk region, produces magnetite- At present, there is an important problem worldwide in hematite concentrate. The processing technology the disposal of waste generated during the mineral includes several magnetic separation stages to produce production and processing. Tailings dumps occupy huge magnetite concentrate and two jigging stages to produce areas and pollute the environment. However, waste hematite concentrate from a non-magnetic fraction of material contains some valuable components that can be magnetic separation [13]. used in various industries. In the initial period of plant operation (since 1955) In Russia, mining-induced waste occupies more than iron ore tailings were stored in the Southern Bay of 300 thousand hectares of lands. -
Banded Iron Formations
Banded Iron Formations Cover Slide 1 What are Banded Iron Formations (BIFs)? • Large sedimentary structures Kalmina gorge banded iron (Gypsy Denise 2013, Creative Commons) BIFs were deposited in shallow marine troughs or basins. Deposits are tens of km long, several km wide and 150 – 600 m thick. Photo is of Kalmina gorge in the Pilbara (Karijini National Park, Hamersley Ranges) 2 What are Banded Iron Formations (BIFs)? • Large sedimentary structures • Bands of iron rich and iron poor rock Iron rich bands: hematite (Fe2O3), magnetite (Fe3O4), siderite (FeCO3) or pyrite (FeS2). Iron poor bands: chert (fine‐grained quartz) and low iron oxide levels Rock sample from a BIF (Woudloper 2009, Creative Commons 1.0) Iron rich bands are composed of hematitie (Fe2O3), magnetite (Fe3O4), siderite (FeCO3) or pyrite (FeS2). The iron poor bands contain chert (fine‐grained quartz) with lesser amounts of iron oxide. 3 What are Banded Iron Formations (BIFs)? • Large sedimentary structures • Bands of iron rich and iron poor rock • Archaean and Proterozoic in age BIF formation through time (KG Budge 2020, public domain) BIFs were deposited for 2 billion years during the Archaean and Proterozoic. There was another short time of deposition during a Snowball Earth event. 4 Why are BIFs important? • Iron ore exports are Australia’s top earner, worth $61 billion in 2017‐2018 • Iron ore comes from enriched BIF deposits Rio Tinto iron ore shiploader in the Pilbara (C Hargrave, CSIRO Science Image) Australia is consistently the leading iron ore exporter in the world. We have large deposits where the iron‐poor chert bands have been leached away, leaving 40%‐60% iron. -
Smelting Iron from Laterite: Technical Possibility Or Ethnographic Aberration?
Smelting Iron from Laterite: Technical Possibility or Ethnographic Aberration? T. O. PRYCE AND S. NATAPINTU introduction Laterites deposits (orlateriticsoilsastheyarealsocalled)arefrequently reported in Southeast Asia, and are ethnographically attested to have been used for the smelting of iron in the region (Abendanon 1917 in Bronson 1992:73; Bronson and Charoenwongsa 1986), as well as in Africa (Gordon and Killick 1993; Miller and Van Der Merwe 1994). The present authors do not dispute this evidence; we merely wish to counsel cautioninitsextrapolation.Modifyingour understanding of a population’s potential to locally produce their own iron has immediate ramifications for how we reconstruct ancient metal distribution net- works, and the social exchanges that have facilitated them since iron’s generally agreed appearance in Southeast Asian archaeological contexts during the mid-first millennium b.c. (e.g., Bellwood 2007:268; Higham 1989:190). We present this paper as a wholly constructive critique of what appears to be a prevailingperspectiveonpre-modernSoutheastAsianironmetallurgy.Wehave tried to avoid technical language and jargon wherever possible, as our aim is to motivate scholars working within the regiontogivefurtherconsiderationtoiron as a metal, as a technology, and as a socially significant medium (e.g., Appadurai 1998; Binsbergen 2005; Gosden and Marshall 1999). When writing a critique it is of course necessary to cite researchers with whom one disagrees, and we have done this with full acknowledgment that in modern archaeology no one person can encompass the entire knowledge spectrum of the discipline.1 The archaeome- tallurgy of iron is probably on the periphery of most of our colleagues’ interests, but sometimes, within the technical, lies the pivotal, and in sharing some of our insights we hope to illuminate issues of benefit to all researchers in Metal Age Southeast Asia. -
Development of the New Method for Oxidized Nickel Ore Processing
NIOKR-2018 Theoretical and practical conference with international participation and School KnE Materials Science for young scientists «FERROALLOYS: Development prospects of metallurgy and machine building based on completed Research and Development» Volume 2019 Conference Paper Development of the New Method for Oxidized Nickel Ore Processing Boris Dmitrievich Khalezov, Oleg Vadimovich Zayakin, Alexey Sergeevich Gavrilov, and Vladimir Ivanovich Zhuchkov IMET UB RAS, Ekaterinburg, Russia Abstract In modern conditions of sharp fluctuations in nickel prices on world markets, the problem of profitability of processing Russian poor oxidized nickel ores (ONO) has arisen. As an alternative to the previously existing in Russia, a sulphidation-reducing smelting on a matte, a hydro-pyrometallurgical method has been proposed for the preparation of complex nickel-, chromium-, manganese-containing ferroalloys. At the first stage, hydrolytic precipitation (with sodium hydroxide) is considered as a method of processing production solutions from heap leaching of ONO. It is established that Corresponding Author: at pH = 5.5, Al is completely removed in the precipitate as hydroxide. After washing Oleg Vadimovich Zayakin from impurities and calcining, a concentrate containing 50 wt.% Al was obtained. At the [email protected] second stage, at pH = 9.5, more than 99% of nickel and cobalt oxides, as well as 92% Received: 5 February 2019 MnO and 46% MgO, are precipitated. Obtained after washing and calcination at 700∘C Accepted: 6 March 2019 oxide concentrate contains, by weight. %: 67 NiO; 3 CoO; 20 MnO; 9 MgO; 0,2 S. At the Published: 17 March 2019 third stage, a pyrometallurgical method for smelting complex ferroalloys of the Fe-Ni-Cr- Publishing services provided by Mn-Si system using refractory ferrosilicochrome as a reducing agent is proposed for the Knowledge E processing of nickel-containing concentrate. -
ITP Mining: Energy and Environmental Profile of the U.S. Mining Industry: Chapter 4: Iron
Energy and Environmental Profile of the U.S. Mining Industry 4 Iron The chemical element iron is the fourth most common element in the Earth's crust and the second most abundant metal. About five percent of the Earth's crust is composed of iron. The metal is chemically active and is found in nature combined with other elements in rocks and soils. In its natural state, iron is chemically bonded with oxygen, water, carbon dioxide, or sulfur in a variety of minerals. Forms of Iron Minerals, Ores, and Rocks Iron occurs mainly in iron-oxide ores. Some ores are a mixture of minerals rich in iron. Other iron ores are less rich and have a large number of impurities. The most important iron ore- forming minerals are: • Magnetite - Magnetite (Fe3O4) forms magnetic black iron ore. There are large deposits of magnetite in Russia and Sweden. • Hematite - Hematite (Fe2O3) is a red iron ore. Hematite occurs in almost all forms, from solid rock to loose earth. It is the most plentiful iron ore and occurs in large quantities throughout the world. • Goethite - Goethite (Fe2O3.H2O), a brown ore, contains iron. • Limonite - Limonite (Fe2O3.H2O) is a yellow-brown iron ore. Limonite is a collective term for impure goethite and a mixture of hydrated iron oxides. Iron 4-1 Energy and Environmental Profile of the U.S. Mining Industry Taconite contains low-grade iron in fine specks and bands. It is an extremely hard and flinty - containing about 25 - 30 percent iron. The iron in taconite occurs principally as magnetite and hematite and finely dispersed with silica in sedimentary deposits. -
Study on the Extraction and Separation of Zinc, Cobalt, and Nickel Using Ionquest 801, Cyanex 272, and Their Mixtures
metals Article Study on the Extraction and Separation of Zinc, Cobalt, and Nickel Using Ionquest 801, Cyanex 272, and Their Mixtures Wensen Liu 1,2,3, Jian Zhang 3,4,5, Zhenya Xu 6, Jie Liang 1,* and Zhaowu Zhu 2,3,4,* 1 School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China; [email protected] 2 Innovation Academy for Green Manufacture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China 3 National Engineering Laboratory for Hydrometallurgical Cleaner Production Technology, Beijing 100190, China; [email protected] 4 Key Laboratory of Green Process and Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China 5 School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 6 The College of Chemical Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100028, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (J.L.); [email protected] (Z.Z.) Abstract: Both Cyanex 272 (bis (2,4,4-trimethylpentyl) phosphinic acid) and Ionquest 801 (2-ethylhexyl phosphonic acid mono-2-ethylhexyl ester) are commonly used for metal extraction and separation, particularly for zinc, cobalt, and nickel, which are often found together in processing solutions. Detailed metal extractions of zinc, cobalt, and nickel were studied in this paper using Cya-nex 272, Ionquest 801, and their mixtures. It was found that they performed very similarly in zinc selectivity over cobalt. Cyanex 272 performed much better than Ionquest 801 in cobalt separation from nickel. Citation: Liu, W.; Zhang, J.; Xu, Z.; However, very good separation of them was also obtained with Ionquest 801 at its low concentration Liang, J.; Zhu, Z. -
Conservation and Systematic Development of Iron
1 PART : II INTRODUCTION CONSERVATION (PRESERVATION) AND SYSTEMATIC DEVELOPMENT OF IRON ORE One of the species of National Wealth is iron ore. Conservation of this mineral is of prime importance for industrial development. Indian legislature has recognized it in Section: 18 of the Mines & Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957. Section : 18, inter-alia, directs the Central Government to take all such steps as may be necessary for: (a) the conservation (Preservation) (b) and systematic development of minerals in India Systematic development of minerals in India would require: (a) exact estimate of reserves available (b) reasonable estimate of resources from where probable reserves can be estimated. This, inter–alia, would require opening of new mines. For that purpose, exploration is necessary. 2 For this, it would be worthwhile to refer to: A (REPORTS FOR EXPLORATION) (i) DOCUMENT ON STRATEGY FOR EXPLORATION, EXPLOITATION AND DEVELOPMENT FOR IRON ORE IN INDIA, PUBLISHED BY THE SUB–GROUP ON IRON ORE in India (January, 2006) (ii) MINERAL POLICY ISSUES IN THE CONTEXT OF EXPORT AND DOMESTIC USE OF IRON ORE IN INDIA - REPORT - FEBRUARY 2008 (INDIAN COUNCIL FOR RESEARCH ON INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC RELATIONS) (iii) ECONOMICS OF SPONGE IRON AND STEEL PRODUCTION (SEPTEMBER, 2008) BY STEEL AND NATURAL RESOURCES STRATEGY RESEARCH, VASANT KUNJ, NEW DELHI (iv) IRON ORE – STATUS AND FUTURE PROSPECTS” by M. S. Jairam, Director, Geological Survey of India (v) IBM REPORT, 2009, AND PROVISIONAL FIGURES, AS ON 1-4-2010, SUPPLIED BY IBM, FOR IRON ORE 3 B (ILLEGAL MINING) (vi) 19TH REPORT OF STANDING COMMITTEE ON COAL & STEEL which highlights menace of illegal mining. -
Cobalt: Demand-Supply Balances in the Transition to Electric Mobility
Cobalt: demand-supply balances in the transition to electric mobility Alves Dias P., Blagoeva D., Pavel C., Arvanitidis N. 2018 EUR 29381 EN This publication is a Technical report by the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Commission’s science and knowledge service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policymaking process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use that might be made of this publication. Contact information Name: Patrícia Alves Dias & Darina Blagoeva Address European Commission, Joint Research Centre, P.O. Box 2, NL-1755 ZG Petten, The Netherlands Email: [email protected] & [email protected] Tel.: +31 22456-5054 / +31 22456-5030 JRC Science Hub https://ec.europa.eu/jrc JRC112285 EUR 29381 EN PDF ISBN 978-92-79-94311-9 ISSN 1831-9424 doi:10.2760/97710 Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018 © European Union/European Atomic Energy Community, 2018 The reuse policy of the European Commission is implemented by Commission Decision 2011/833/EU of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. 39). Reuse is authorised, provided the source of the document is acknowledged and its original meaning or message is not distorted. The European Commission shall not be liable for any consequence stemming from the reuse. For any use or reproduction of photos or other material that is not owned by the EU, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders. -
First Cobalt Refinery Engineering Report
First Cobalt Refinery Project Ontario, Canada Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering (AACE) Class 3 Feasibility Study July 9, 2020 Prepared for: First Cobalt Corporation 401 Bay St., 6th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5H 2Y4 Prepared by: Ausenco Engineering Canada 855 Homer St., Vancouver, BC, V6C 2X8 This report was prepared to summarise the results of the feasibility study related to the First Cobalt Refinery Project. This report does not constitute a feasibility study within the definition employed by the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM), as it relates to a stand-along industrial project and does not concern a mineral project of First Cobalt. As a result, disclosure standards prescribed by National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (NI 43-101) are not applicable to the scientific and technical disclosure in this report. Any references to scoping study, prefeasibility study or feasibility study by First Cobalt, in relation to the Refinery Project, are not the same as terms defined by the CIM Definition Standards and used in NI 43-101. First Cobalt Refinery Project AACE Class 3 Feasibility Study 1 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Property Description & Location ............................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Infrastructure & Physiography .................................................................................................................