DOCSLIB.ORG

Fossil Record of Sternorrhyncha (Hemiptera)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Bo Wang 1, Jacek Szwedo 2 1 Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China; e-mail; [email protected] 2 Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Parasitology, University of Gdańsk, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] 2016 XXV International Congress of Entomology Orlando, Florida, USA | September 25-30 535: Symposium: Synthesis in Sternorrhyncha Systematics HYPOPERLIDA other Psocoptera Psocodea Liposcelidae Phthiraptera AMBLYCERA ISCHNOCERA RHYNCOPTHIRINA ANOPLURA HOLOMETABOLA PERMOPSOCIDA THRIPIDA PALEORRHYNCHA STERNORRHYNCHA Hemiptera FULGOROMORPHA CICADOMORPHA COLEORRHYNCHA HETEROPTERA Where to search for sternorrhynchan ancestors? What constitutes a sternorrhynchan insect? The recent morphological disparity and biodiversity is enormous, then which characters can be used for the fossils? Which is the oldest Sternorrhyncha? The questions where and when the splitting of Sternorrhyncha from hemipteran stock took place are not fully answered. INTERNATIONAL CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHIC CHART www.stratigraphy.org International Commission on Stratigraphy v 2016/04 numerical numerical numerical Eonothem numerical Series / Epoch Stage / Age Series / Epoch Stage / Age Series / Epoch Stage / Age Erathem / Era System / Period GSSP GSSP age (Ma) GSSP GSSP Eonothem /Eon Erathem /Era System /Period Eonothem /Eon Erathem /Era System /Period age (Ma) Eonothem /Eon Erathem /Era System /Period age (Ma) / Eon GSSA age (Ma) present ~ 145.0 358.9 ± 0.4 541.0 ±1.0 y Holocene r Ediacaran 0.0117 Tithonian a Upper 152.1 ±0.9 Famennian ~ 635 n Neo- Cryogenian r 0.126 Upper Kimmeridgian Middle Upper proterozoic ~ 720 e 157.3 ±1.0 t Pleistocene 0.781 372.2 ±1.6 a Calabrian Oxfordian Tonian u 1.80 163.5 ±1.0 Frasnian Callovian 1000 n c 166.1 ±1.2 Q Gelasian 2.58 i 382.7 ±1.6 Stenian Bathonian a s Piacenzian Middle 168.3 ±1.3 i s Bajocian Givetian 1200 Pliocene 3.600 170.3 ±1.4 n Meso- a 387.7 ±0.8 o Middle Ectasian Zanclean r Aalenian c v proterozoic 5.333 i u 174.1 ±1.0 Eifelian 1400 e o Messinian J 393.3 ±1.2 e Toarcian z 7.246 D Calymmian n 182.7 ±0.7 o r 1600 e Tortonian Emsian 11.63 c i e g Pliensbachian t Statherian o Lower o Serravallian 407.6 ±2.6 190.8 ±1.0 Lower o 13.82 z 1800 r e Miocene Pragian 410.8 ±2.8 n o c i Langhian Sinemurian P N a Orosirian 15.97 s i o 199.3 ±0.3 Lochkovian r Paleo- e z Burdigalian Hettangian 2050 201.3 ±0.2 419.2 ±3.2 b proterozoic o 20.44 M Rhyacian m n Aquitanian Rhaetian Pridoli a e 23.03 ~ 208.5 423.0 ±2.3 2300 Ludfordian c C 425.6 ±0.9 Chattian Ludlow e Siderian n 28.1 Gorstian 427.4 ±0.5 r Oligocene Upper Norian a 2500 P i c Homerian r Rupelian i Wenlock 430.5 ±0.7 Neo- u s ~ 227 33.9 l Sheinwoodian 433.4 ±0.8 archean i s a 2800 Priabonian Carnian S e i Telychian 37.8 r ~ 237 n n Llandovery 438.5 ±1.1 Meso- Bartonian T a e 41.2 Ladinian Aeronian 440.8 ±1.2 archean c c c e g ~ 242 i Eocene i Middle i Rhuddanian c h o Lutetian 3200 o o o 443.8 ±1.5 Anisian i c e z z z 247.2 o Hirnantian l 47.8 445.2 ±1.4 r Paleo- o o o z a Olenekian 251.2 A r r Lower r Ypresian o Katian archean P e e Induan 252.17 ±0.06 e Upper 56.0 e l n n n 3600 Changhsingian 254.14 ±0.07 453.0 ±0.7 n a a Thanetian a a 59.2 Lopingian Sandbian Eo- a h h h P Wuchiapingian i Paleocene Selandian 458.4 ±0.9 259.8 ±0.4 c archean P P P 61.6 i Capitanian v Darriwilian 4000 Danian 265.1 ±0.4 Middle 66.0 o 467.3 ±1.1 Guadalupian Wordian d n 268.8 ±0.5 r Dapingian 470.0 ±1.4 Hadean Maastrichtian a i Roadian O ~ 4600 72.1 ±0.2 272.3 ±0.5 Floian m Campanian r Lower 477.7 ±1.4 Units of all ranks are in the process of being defined by Global e Kungurian 283.5 ±0.6 Tremadocian Boundary Stratotype Section and Points (GSSP) for their lower 83.6 ±0.2 P boundaries, including those of the Archean and Proterozoic, long 485.4 ±1.9 Upper Santonian 86.3 ±0.5 Artinskian defined by Global Standard Stratigraphic Ages (GSSA). Charts and Cisuralian 290.1 ±0.26 Stage 10 detailed information on ratified GSSPs are available at the website Coniacian ~ 489.5 c http://www.stratigraphy.org. The URL to this chart is found below. 89.8 ±0.3 i Sakmarian 295.0 ±0.18 Furongian Jiangshanian Turonian o s ~ 494 z Asselian Paibian Numerical ages are subject to revision and do not define uni ts in c 93.9 298.9 ±0.15 u o i ~ 497 n the Phanerozoic and the Ediacaran; only GSSPs do. For boundaries o e o a Cenomanian l Gzhelian Guzhangian i in the Phanerozoic without ratified GSSPs or without constrained e Upper 303.7 ±0.1 z n 100.5 a ~ 500.5 c numerical ages, an approximate numerical age (~) is provided. a o Kasimovian 307.0 ±0.1 P n v a Series 3 Drumian s l t a Albian y ~ 504.5 s e Middle Moscovian i e s Numerical ages for all systems except Lower Pleistocene, r r u Stage 5 ~ 113.0 n 315.2 ±0.2 M Permian,Triassic, Cretaceous and Precambrian are taken from b n o C ~ 509 r e ‘A Geologic Time Scale 2012’ by Gradstein et al. (2012); Aptian Lower Bashkirian m Stage 4 e P those for the Lower Pleistocene, Permian, Triassic and Cretaceous f 323.2 ±0.4 a ~ 125.0 i Series 2 ~ 514 were provided by the relevant ICS subcommissions. n C n Upper Serpukhovian Stage 3 o Barremian a i 330.9 ±0.2 b Coloring follows the Commission for the Lower ~ 129.4 p ~ 521 r p Geological Map of the World (http://www.ccgm.org) i Hauterivian a Stage 2 ~ 132.9 s Middle Visean s C i ~ 529 Chart drafted by K.M. Cohen, S.C. Finney, P.L. Gibbard s 346.7 ±0.4 Valanginian Terreneuvian (c) International Commission on Stratigraphy, April 2016 s ~ 139.8 i Fortunian Berriasian M Lower Tournaisian To cite: Cohen, K.M., Finney, S.C., Gibbard, P.L. & Fan, J.-X. (2013; updated) ~ 145.0 358.9 ±0.4 541.0 ±1.0 The ICS International Chronostratigraphic Chart. Episodes 36: 199-204. URL: http://www.stratigraphy.org/ICSchart/ChronostratChart2016-04.pdf Aviorrhyncha magnifica Nel et al. 2013 Protoprosbole straeleni Laurentiaux, 1952 (Moscovian, Pennsylvanian; France) (Bashkirian, Pennsylvanian; Belgium) Protoprosbole Aviorrhyncha Suborder Paleorrhyncha Fam: Archescytinidae = Permopsylliidae = Lithoscytinidae = Maueriidae = Permoscytinopsidae = Uraloscytinidae = Maripsocidae = Kaltanaphididae There is a considerable diversity of Permian hemipterans, but their relationships are obscure. The supposed ancestors of the Sternorrhyncha are among the members of the suborder Paleorrhyncha. Where to search for Sternorrhyncha ancestors? Paleorrhyncha This group is a paraphyletic assemblage, ranging from the late Carboniferous (300 mya) to late Permian (270 mya). • smaller size • homonomic venation of forewings and hind wings • antennae 10-segmented with rhinaria • probably gall-making • trophic relationships with seed ferns and early gymnosperms Paleorrhyncha display several morphological specializations, e.g. variously formed ovipositors from short needle-like to very long, and forming a coil under the body. Also the placement of the rostrum base is variable. On the other hand, they show some sternorrhynchous characters, i.e. smaller size, antennae with rhinaria, and relatively simple venation. Rasnitsyn & Quicke (2002) The fossil record of the Sternorrhyncha stretches back to the Permian (270 mya); most of the fossil sites are distributed in the northern hemisphere; and only a few sites are located in the southern hemisphere. Where to search for sternorrhynchan ancestors? Sternorrhyncha • Earliest Sternorrhyncha are closely related to the Paleorrhyncha (ancestral or sister-group relationship to be revealed) • According to the fossil record, the lineage Pincombeomorpha + Aphidomorpha separated earlier than Psylloidea + Aleyrodoidea • exclusively plant sap-feeders (phloem feeders) • underwent morphological and behavioral differentiation in the Permian • have the first major radiation in the Triassic (250−200 mya) • the second in the Late Cretaceous (100−65 mya) What constitutes a sternorrhynchan insect ? First separation of Sternorrhyncha took place in the Permian (250 mya), when the infraorders Pincombeomorpha and Aphidomorpha appeared. Pincombeomorpha, with three families occur in the Permian to the Late Triassic (about 270−200 mya). Rasnitsyn & Quicke (2002) Pincombeomorpha Their characters are the forewing with the radius posterior vein (RP) originating well before the pterostigma, convex up to the nodal line and concave beyond it; nodal line crossing RP near base; median vein (M) and cubitus anterior vein (CuA) forming a short common stalk; claval vein(s) remote from posterior margin. Pincombea sp. Simulaphis shaposhnikovi Shcherbakov, 2007 Upper Permian, Australia Upper Permian, Australia During the Permian (300-250 mya), Pincombeomorpha were present in both hemispheres, but from the Triassic they are only known from the northern hemisphere. Pincombeidae (Permian-Triassic) Simulaphididae (Permian) Boreoscytidae (Permian) Evolutionary histories of each extant sternorrhynchan lineage – aphids, coccids, psyllids and whiteflies are far from complete. They are rarely fossilized because they have small and delicate bodies, and the known fossils are preserved mostly in Cretaceous and Cenozoic ambers. Next part I will briefly introduce the history of these lineages. The early evolution of aphids (Aphidomorpha) Aphidomorpha occurs in the Permian, is represented by one species.
Recommended publications
  • Historical Biogeography of an Emergent Forest Pest, Matsucoccus Macrocicatrices

    Historical Biogeography of an Emergent Forest Pest, Matsucoccus Macrocicatrices

    Received: 19 April 2019 | Revised: 7 August 2019 | Accepted: 12 August 2019 DOI: 10.1111/jbi.13702 RESEARCH PAPER Native or non‐native? Historical biogeography of an emergent forest pest, Matsucoccus macrocicatrices Thomas D. Whitney1,2 | Kamal J. K. Gandhi1 | Rima D. Lucardi2 1Puyallup Research and Extension Center, Washington State University, Abstract Puyallup, WA 98371, USA Aim: A historically benign insect herbivore, Matsucoccus macrocicatrices, has re‐ 2 USDA Forest Service, Southern Research cently been linked to dieback and mortality of eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.). Station, 320 E. Green Street, Athens, GA 30602, USA Previous reports indicated that its native range was restricted to New England, USA and southeastern Canada. Now, the insect occurs throughout an area extending from Correspondence Thomas D. Whitney, Puyallup Research the putative native range, southward to Georgia, and westward to Wisconsin. Our and Extension Center, Washington State goal was to evaluate whether its current distribution was due to recent introduc‐ University, Puyallup, WA 98371, USA. Email: [email protected] tions consistent with invasion processes. We considered two hypotheses: (a) if recent expansion into adventive regions occurred, those populations would have reduced Funding information USDA Forest Service, Southern genetic diversity due to founder effect(s); alternatively (b) if M. macrocicatrices is na‐ Research Station, Grant/Award tive and historically co‐occurred with its host tree throughout the North American Number: 13‐CA‐11330129‐056 and 16‐ CS‐11330129‐045; Southern Region (8)‐ range, then populations would have greater overall genetic diversity and a population Forest Health Protection; USDA Agricultural structure indicative of past biogeographical influences.
  • Zootaxa,Phylogeny and Higher Classification of the Scale Insects

    Zootaxa,Phylogeny and Higher Classification of the Scale Insects

    Zootaxa 1668: 413–425 (2007) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2007 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Phylogeny and higher classification of the scale insects (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Coccoidea)* P.J. GULLAN1 AND L.G. COOK2 1Department of Entomology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] 2School of Integrative Biology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia. Email: [email protected] *In: Zhang, Z.-Q. & Shear, W.A. (Eds) (2007) Linnaeus Tercentenary: Progress in Invertebrate Taxonomy. Zootaxa, 1668, 1–766. Table of contents Abstract . .413 Introduction . .413 A review of archaeococcoid classification and relationships . 416 A review of neococcoid classification and relationships . .420 Future directions . .421 Acknowledgements . .422 References . .422 Abstract The superfamily Coccoidea contains nearly 8000 species of plant-feeding hemipterans comprising up to 32 families divided traditionally into two informal groups, the archaeococcoids and the neococcoids. The neococcoids form a mono- phyletic group supported by both morphological and genetic data. In contrast, the monophyly of the archaeococcoids is uncertain and the higher level ranks within it have been controversial, particularly since the late Professor Jan Koteja introduced his multi-family classification for scale insects in 1974. Recent phylogenetic studies using molecular and morphological data support the recognition of up to 15 extant families of archaeococcoids, including 11 families for the former Margarodidae sensu lato, vindicating Koteja’s views. Archaeococcoids are represented better in the fossil record than neococcoids, and have an adequate record through the Tertiary and Cretaceous but almost no putative coccoid fos- sils are known from earlier.
  • Distribution Records of Aphids (Hemiptera: Phylloxeroidea, Aphidoidea) Associated with Main Forest-Forming Trees in Northern Europe

    Distribution Records of Aphids (Hemiptera: Phylloxeroidea, Aphidoidea) Associated with Main Forest-Forming Trees in Northern Europe

    © Entomologica Fennica. 5 December 2012 Distribution records of aphids (Hemiptera: Phylloxeroidea, Aphidoidea) associated with main forest-forming trees in Northern Europe Andrey V. Stekolshchikov & Mikhail V. Kozlov Stekolshchikov, A. V.& Kozlov, M. V.2012: Distribution records of aphids (He- miptera: Phylloxeroidea, Aphidoidea) associated with main forest-forming trees in Northern Europe. — Entomol. Fennica 23: 206–214. We report records of 25 species of aphids collected from four species of woody plants (Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies, Betula pubescens and B. pendula)at50 study sites in Northern Europe, located from 59° to 70° N and from 10° to 60° E. Critical evaluation of earlier publications demonstrated that in spite of the obvi- ous limitations of our survey, the obtained information substantially contributed to the knowledge of the distribution of aphids in North European Russia, includ- ing Murmansk oblast (103 species recorded to date), Republic of Karelia (58 spe- cies), Arkhangelsk oblast (37 species), Vologda oblast (17 species) and Republic of Komi (29 species). We confirm the occurrence of Cinara nigritergi in South- ern Karelia; Pineus cembrae, Cinara pilosa and Monaphis antennata are for the first time recorded in Norway. A. V.Stekolshchikov, Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Univer- sitetskaya nab. 1, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia; E-mail: [email protected] M. V. Kozlov, Section of Ecology, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, Finland; E-mail: [email protected] Received 2 February 2012, accepted 5 April 2012 1. Introduction cades (e.g., Albrecht 2012), no comparable data (with rare exceptions) exist for the northern parts Species distributions and, consequently, spatial of the European Russia.
  • The <I>Matsucoccus</I> Cockerell, 1909 of Florida (Hemiptera

    The <I>Matsucoccus</I> Cockerell, 1909 of Florida (Hemiptera

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida 9-30-2020 The Matsucoccus Cockerell, 1909 of Florida (Hemiptera: Coccomorpha: Matsucoccidae): Potential pests of Florida pines Muhammad Z. Ahmed Charles H. Ray Matthew R. Moore Douglass R. Miller Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Entomology Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. InsectaA journal of world insect systematics Mundi 0810 The Matsucoccus Cockerell, 1909 of Florida Page Count: 31 (Hemiptera: Coccomorpha: Matsucoccidae): Potential pests of Florida pines Muhammad Z. Ahmed Florida State Collection of Arthropods Division of Plant Industry, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services 1911 SW 34th Street Gainesville, FL 32608, USA [email protected] Charles H. Ray Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology Auburn University Museum of Natural History Room 301, Funchess Hall Auburn University, AL 36849, USA Matthew R. Moore Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory Division of Plant Industry, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services 1911 SW 34th Street Gainesville, FL 32608, USA Douglass R. Miller Florida State Collection of Arthropods Division of Plant Industry, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services 1911 SW 34th Street Gainesville, FL 32608, USA Date of issue: October 30, 2020 Center for Systematic Entomology, Inc., Gainesville, FL Ahmed MZ, Ray CH, Moore MR, Miller DR.
  • Macedonian Journal of Ecology and Environment Diversity of Invertebrates in the Republic of Macedonia

    Macedonian Journal of Ecology and Environment Diversity of Invertebrates in the Republic of Macedonia

    Macedonian Journal of Ecology and Environment Vol. 17, issue 1 pp. 5-44 Skopje (2015) ISSN 1857 - 8330 Original scientific paper Available online at www.mjee.org.mk Diversity of invertebrates in the Republic of Macedonia Диверзитет на безрбетниците во Република Македонија 1,2, * 1,2 3 4 Slavčo HRISTOVSKI , Valentina SLAVEVSKA-STAMENKOVIĆ , Nikola HRISTOVSKI , Kiril ARSOVSKI , 5 6 6 7 8 Rostislav BEKCHIEV , Dragan CHOBANOV , Ivaylo DEDOV , Dušan DEVETAK , Ivo KARAMAN , Despina 2 9 6 2 10 KITANOVA , Marjan KOMNENOV , Toshko LJUBOMIROV , Dime MELOVSKI , Vladimir PEŠIĆ , Nikolay 5 SIMOV 1 Institute of Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Arhimedova 5, 1000 Skopje, Macedonia 2 Macedonian Ecological Society, Vladimir Nazor 10, 1000 Skopje, Macedonia 3 Faculty of Biotechnology, St. Kliment Ohridski University, 7000 Bitola, Macedonia 4 Biology Students' Research Society, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Arhimedova 5, 1000 Skopje, Macedonia 5 National Museum of Natural History, 1 Tsar Osvoboditel Blvd., 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria 6 Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria 7 Department of Biology, University of Maribor, Koroška cesta 160, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia 8 Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Sciences, Trg D. Obradovića 2, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia 9 Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100 Alexandroupoli, Greece 10 Department of Biology, University of Montenegro, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro The assessment of the diversity of invertebrates in Macedonia was based on previous assess- ments and analyses of new published data in the period 2003-2013 (after the first country study on biodiversity).
  • A Study of the Scale Insect Genera Puto Signoret (Hemiptera

    A Study of the Scale Insect Genera Puto Signoret (Hemiptera

    Zootaxa 2802: 1–22 (2011) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2011 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) A study of the scale insect genera Puto Signoret (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Coccoidea: Putoidae) and Ceroputo Šulc (Pseudococcidae) with a comparison to Phenacoccus Cockerell (Pseudococcidae) D.J. WILLIAMS1, P.J. GULLAN2,3,6 , D.R. MILLER4, D. MATILE-FERRERO5 & SARAH I. HAN2 1Department of Entomology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, U.K. 2Department of Entomology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] 3Division of Evolution, Ecology and Genetics, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, A.C.T., 0200, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] 4U.S. Department of Agriculture, Systematic Entomology Laboratory, PSI, Agricultural Research Service, Building 005, Barc-West, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, Beltsville, MD 20705, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] 5Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Département Systématique etÉvolution, UMR 7205, MNHN-CNRS, Entomologie. 45, rue Buf- fon, CP 50, F-75231 Paris Cedex 05, France. 6Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] Abstract For almost a century, the scale insect genus Puto Signoret (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Coccoidea) was considered to be- long to the family Pseudococcidae (the mealybugs), but recent consensus accords Puto its own family, the Putoidae. This paper reviews the taxonomic history of Puto and family Putoidae, compares the morphology of Puto to that of Ceroputo Šulc and Phenacoccus Cockerell, and reassesses the status of all species that have been placed in Puto to determine wheth- er they belong to the Putoidae or to the Pseudococcidae.
  • Insect Orders

    Insect Orders

    CMG GardenNotes #313 Insect Orders Outline Anoplura: sucking lice, page 1 Blattaria: cockroaches and woodroaches, page 2 Coleoptera: beetles, page 2 Collembola: springtails, page 4 Dermaptera: earwigs, page 4 Diptera: flies, page 5 Ephemeroptera: mayflies, page 6 Hemiptera (suborder Heteroptera): true bugs, page 7 Hemiptera (suborders Auchenorrhyncha and Sternorrhyncha): aphids, cicadas, leafhoppers, mealybugs, scale and whiteflies, page 8 Hymenoptera: ants, bees, horntails, sawflies, and wasp, page 9 Isoptera: termites, page 11 Lepidoptera: butterflies and moths, page 12 Mallophaga: chewing and biting lice, page 13 Mantodea: mantids, page 14 Neuroptera: antlions, lacewings, snakeflies and dobsonflies, page 14 Odonata: dragonflies and damselflies, page 15 Orthoptera: crickets, grasshoppers, and katydids, page 15 Phasmida: Walking sticks, page 16 Plecoptera: stoneflies, page 16 Psocoptera: Psocids or booklice, page 17 Siphonaptera: Fleas, page 17 Thysanoptera: Thrips, page 17 Trichoptera: Caddisflies, page 18 Zygentomaa: Silverfish and Firebrats, page 18 Anoplura Sucking Lice • Feeds by sucking blood from mammals. • Some species (head lice and crabs lice) feed on humans. Metamorphosis: Simple/Gradual Features: [Figure 1] Figure 1. Sucking lice o Wingless o Mouthparts: Piercing/sucking, designed to feed on blood. o Body: Small head with larger, pear-shaped thorax and nine segmented abdomen. 313-1 Blattaria (Subclass of Dictyoptera) Cockroaches and Woodroaches • Most species are found in warmer subtropical to tropical climates. • The German, Oriental and American cockroach are indoor pests. • Woodroaches live outdoors feeding on decaying bark and other debris. Metamorphosis: Simple/Gradual Figure 2. American cockroach Features: [Figure 2] o Body: Flattened o Antennae: Long, thread-like o Mouthparts: Chewing o Wings: If present, are thickened, semi-transparent with distinct veins and lay flat.
  • The Infraorder Coccomorpha (Insecta: Hemiptera)

    The Infraorder Coccomorpha (Insecta: Hemiptera)

    Zootaxa 4979 (1): 226–227 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Correspondence ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2021 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4979.1.24 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7645DB6A-39F7-4208-9924-3BF99CDC3AAA The Infraorder Coccomorpha (Insecta: Hemiptera) CHRIS HODGSON1, BARB DENNO2 & GILLIAN W. WATSON3 1 [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9073-1485 2 [email protected] 3 [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9914-0094 The scale insects (infraorder Coccomorpha) are the most morphologically specialised members of the Hemiptera. They form a monophyletic group within the suborder Sternorrhyncha, having one-segmented tarsi and a single claw (all other hemipterans have a double claw). They show extreme sexual dimorphism: the more-or-less sessile adult females are wingless and larviform, whereas the motile adult males mostly are winged and lack mouthparts. Within the Coccomorpha, 54 families are currently recognised, of which 20 are known only from fossils and 34 are extant (García Morales et al. 2016). Scale insects are small (adult females are mostly 0.01–2.0 cm long) and live mainly in crevices or on the undersides of plant structures, feeding on plant sap. Some members of the infraorder are extremely important economically and can attack any part of a plant, injecting toxic saliva as they feed, and sometimes spreading plant virus diseases. The resulting sap depletion initially causes wilting, reducing photosynthesis, and can lead to the death of plant tissues and eventually to death of the host plant.
  • Molecular Evolutionary Trends and Feeding Ecology Diversification In

    Molecular Evolutionary Trends and Feeding Ecology Diversification In

    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/201731; this version posted October 11, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Molecular evolutionary trends and 2 feeding ecology diversification in the Hemiptera, 3 anchored by the milkweed bug genome 4 5 6 Kristen A. Panfilio1, 2*, Iris M. Vargas Jentzsch1, Joshua B. Benoit3, Deniz 7 Erezyilmaz4, Yuichiro Suzuki5, Stefano Colella6, 7, Hugh M. Robertson8, Monica F. 8 Poelchau9, Robert M. Waterhouse10, 11, Panagiotis Ioannidis10, Matthew T. 9 Weirauch12, Daniel S.T. Hughes13, Shwetha C. Murali13, 14, 15, John H. Werren16, Chris 10 G.C. Jacobs17, 18, Elizabeth J. Duncan19, 20, David Armisén21, Barbara M.I. Vreede22, 11 Patrice Baa-Puyoulet6, Chloé S. Berger21, Chun-che Chang23, Hsu Chao13, Mei-Ju M. 12 Chen9, Yen-Ta Chen1, Christopher P. Childers9, Ariel D. Chipman22, Andrew G. 13 Cridge19, Antonin J.J. Crumière21, Peter K. Dearden19, Elise M. Didion3, Huyen 14 Dinh13, HarshaVardhan Doddapaneni13, Amanda Dolan16, 24, Shannon Dugan13, 15 Cassandra G. Extavour25, 26, Gérard Febvay6, Markus Friedrich27, Neta Ginzburg22, Yi 16 Han13, Peter Heger28, Thorsten Horn1, Yi-min Hsiao23, Emily C. Jennings3, J. Spencer 17 Johnston29, Tamsin E. Jones25, Jeffery W. Jones27, Abderrahman Khila21, Stefan 18 Koelzer1, Viera Kovacova30, Megan Leask19, Sandra L. Lee13, Chien-Yueh Lee9, 19 Mackenzie R. Lovegrove19, Hsiao-ling Lu23, Yong Lu31, Patricia J. Moore32, Monica 20 C. Munoz-Torres33, Donna M. Muzny13, Subba R. Palli34, Nicolas Parisot6, Leslie 21 Pick31, Megan Porter35, Jiaxin Qu13, Peter N. Refki21, 36, Rose Richter16, 37, Rolando 22 Rivera Pomar38, Andrew J.
  • Diverse New Scale Insects (Hemiptera, Coccoidea) in Amber

    Diverse New Scale Insects (Hemiptera, Coccoidea) in Amber

    AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES Number 3823, 80 pp. January 16, 2015 Diverse new scale insects (Hemiptera: Coccoidea) in amber from the Cretaceous and Eocene with a phylogenetic framework for fossil Coccoidea ISABELLE M. VEA1'2 AND DAVID A. GRIMALDI2 ABSTRACT Coccoids are abundant and diverse in most amber deposits around the world, but largely as macropterous males. Based on a study of male coccoids in Lebanese amber (Early Cretaceous), Burmese amber (Albian-Cenomanian), Cambay amber from western India (Early Eocene), and Baltic amber (mid-Eocene), 16 new species, 11 new genera, and three new families are added to the coccoid fossil record: Apticoccidae, n. fam., based on Apticoccus Koteja and Azar, and includ¬ ing two new species A.fortis, n. sp., and A. longitenuis, n. sp.; the monotypic family Hodgsonicoc- cidae, n. fam., including Hodgsonicoccus patefactus, n. gen., n. sp.; Kozariidae, n. fam., including Kozarius achronus, n. gen., n. sp., and K. perpetuus, n. sp.; the first occurrence of a Coccidae in Burmese amber, Rosahendersonia prisca, n. gen., n. sp.; the first fossil record of a Margarodidae sensu stricto, Heteromargarodes hukamsinghi, n. sp.; a peculiar Diaspididae in Indian amber, Nor- markicoccus cambayae, n. gen., n. sp.; a Pityococcidae from Baltic amber, Pityococcus monilifor- malis, n. sp., two Pseudococcidae in Lebanese and Burmese ambers, Williamsicoccus megalops, n. gen., n. sp., and Gilderius eukrinops, n. gen., n. sp.; an Early Cretaceous Weitschatidae, Pseudo- weitschatus audebertis, n. gen., n. sp.; four genera considered incertae sedis, Alacrena peculiaris, n. gen., n. sp., Magnilens glaesaria, n. gen., n. sp., and Pedicellicoccus marginatus, n. gen., n. sp., and Xiphos vani, n.
  • HOST PLANTS of SOME STERNORRHYNCHA (Phytophthires) in NETHERLANDS NEW GUINEA (Homoptera)

    HOST PLANTS of SOME STERNORRHYNCHA (Phytophthires) in NETHERLANDS NEW GUINEA (Homoptera)

    Pacific Insects 4 (1) : 119-120 January 31, 1962 HOST PLANTS OF SOME STERNORRHYNCHA (Phytophthires) IN NETHERLANDS NEW GUINEA (Homoptera) By R. T. Simon Thomas DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AFFAIRS, HOLLANDIA In this paper, I list 15 hostplants of some Phytophthires of Netherlands New Guinea. Families, genera within the families and species within the genera are mentioned in alpha­ betical order. The genera and the specific names of the insects are printed in bold-face type, those of the plants are in italics. The locality, where the insects were found, is printed after the host plants. Then follows the date of collection and finally the name of the collector1 in parentheses. I want to acknowledge my great appreciation for the identification of the Aphididae to Mr. D. Hille Ris Lambers and of the Coccoidea to Dr. A. Reyne. Aphididae Cerataphis variabilis Hrl. Cocos nucifera Linn.: Koor, near Sorong, 26-VII-1961 (S. Th.). Longiunguis sacchari Zehntner. Andropogon sorghum Brot.: Kota Nica2 13-V-1959 (S. Th.). Toxoptera aurantii Fonsc. Citrus sp.: Kota Nica, 16-VI-1961 (S. Th.). Theobroma cacao Linn.: Kota Nica, 19-VIII-1959 (S. Th.), Amban-South, near Manokwari, 1-XII- 1960 (J. Schreurs). Toxoptera citricida Kirkaldy. Citrus sp.: Kota Nica, 16-VI-1961 (S. Th.). Schizaphis cyperi v. d. Goot, subsp, hollandiae Hille Ris Lambers (in litt.). Polytrias amaura O. K.: Hollandia, 22-V-1958 (van Leeuwen). COCCOIDEA Aleurodidae Aleurocanthus sp. Citrus sp.: Kota Nica, 16-VI-1961 (S. Th.). Asterolecaniidae Asterolecanium pustulans (Cockerell). Leucaena glauca Bth.: Kota Nica, 8-X-1960 (S. Th.). 1. My name, as collector, is mentioned thus: "S.
  • Bacterial Associates of Orthezia Urticae, Matsucoccus Pini, And

    Bacterial Associates of Orthezia Urticae, Matsucoccus Pini, And

    Protoplasma https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-019-01377-z ORIGINAL ARTICLE Bacterial associates of Orthezia urticae, Matsucoccus pini, and Steingelia gorodetskia - scale insects of archaeoccoid families Ortheziidae, Matsucoccidae, and Steingeliidae (Hemiptera, Coccomorpha) Katarzyna Michalik1 & Teresa Szklarzewicz1 & Małgorzata Kalandyk-Kołodziejczyk2 & Anna Michalik1 Received: 1 February 2019 /Accepted: 2 April 2019 # The Author(s) 2019 Abstract The biological nature, ultrastructure, distribution, and mode of transmission between generations of the microorganisms associ- ated with three species (Orthezia urticae, Matsucoccus pini, Steingelia gorodetskia) of primitive families (archaeococcoids = Orthezioidea) of scale insects were investigated by means of microscopic and molecular methods. In all the specimens of Orthezia urticae and Matsucoccus pini examined, bacteria Wolbachia were identified. In some examined specimens of O. urticae,apartfromWolbachia,bacteriaSodalis were detected. In Steingelia gorodetskia, the bacteria of the genus Sphingomonas were found. In contrast to most plant sap-sucking hemipterans, the bacterial associates of O. urticae, M. pini, and S. gorodetskia are not harbored in specialized bacteriocytes, but are dispersed in the cells of different organs. Ultrastructural observations have shown that bacteria Wolbachia in O. urticae and M. pini, Sodalis in O. urticae, and Sphingomonas in S. gorodetskia are transovarially transmitted from mother to progeny. Keywords Symbiotic microorganisms . Sphingomonas . Sodalis-like