Levelock Watershed Community Planning Project Final Summary Report September 30, 2005

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Levelock Watershed Community Planning Project Final Summary Report September 30, 2005 Levelock Watershed Community Planning Project Final Summary Report September 30, 2005 A project of the Levelock Village Council with assistance from Agnew::Beck Consulting Acknowledgements Thank You The Levelock Village Council would like to thank all those who have helped in this Community Planning project. This project was made possible by the Nick Apokedak, George Wilson, Sr., Alex Tallekpalek, Peter Apokedak, Jr. involved and concerned residents of participate in the August Levelock Watershed Community Workshop. Levelock, who gathered to tell the story of their lands and waters, to discuss the issues and challenges they confront in managing these lands, and the goals they have for their community - both present and future. This report is a summary of the Levelock Village Council work they have done, and a sign of their ongoing interest and effort to manage their watershed effectively, for many generations to come. Howard Nelson President Levelock Village Council was also pleased and helped by the involvement of many other people interested in the health of the Ida Apokedak watershed area. Successful watershed management happens through a Vice President coalition of concerned and involved people. Levelock Village Council would like to thank: Shirley Andrew Secretary • Sue Flensburg Environmental Program Manager Hans Apokedak Bristol Bay Native Association Ray Apokedak • Helen Lons Katmai Park Planner National Park Service Levelock Natives Limited • Thomas Hoseth Lands Management Program Manager Ray Apokedak Bristol Bay Native Association President • Tim Troll Peter Apokedak Sr, Executive Director Vice President Nushagak-Mulchatna/Wood-Tikchik Land Trust Marlys Dobkins • Jason Dye Secretary Sport fi sh Biologist Alaska Department Fish & Game Annette Wilson • Rick Tennyson Sophie Anelon Land Manger Choggiung Limited Howard Nelson This project was facilitated by Agnew::Beck Consulting at the request of the Levelock Village Council. Community planners Ellen Campfi eld, MaryAnne LeMaitre, Kirsten Richardson, Chris Beck and Thea Agnew contributed to this report and project. All photos by Agnew::Beck Consulting, unless otherwise credited. 2 Levelock Watershed Community Planning Project :: Final Summary Report :: Introduction Table of Contents Acknowledgements ................................................... 2 Project Overview....................................................... 4 Executive Summary .................................................. 5 Levelock’s Watershed................................................ 9 Description of the Area ..................................................9 Land & Water Uses ....................................................... 12 Survey of Water Bodies................................................ 15 Community Issues & Concerns.............................. 17 Community Goals & Strategies ............................. 24 Recommendations & Next Steps........................... 28 Appendices ............................................................... 29 Appendix A: Contacts List........................................ 29 Appendix B: Record of Meeting Notes ................. 31 Appendix C: Watershed Management Models..... 37 Appendix D: Nushagak-Mulchatna-Based Management Programs ...................... 39 Appendix E: Priority Projects Worksheet............. 43 Appendix F: Subsistence Data................................. 44 Appendix G: Sport Fish Data ................................... 48 Appendix H: Commerical Fishing Data.................. 50 Appendix I: Bristol Bay Salmon Run Naknek-Kvichak District................... 51 Appendix J: Area Lodges ......................................... 52 Appendix K: Select Project Bibliography ............... 53 River grasses along the bank of the Kvichak. Levelock Watershed Community Planning Project :: Final Summary Report :: Introduction 3 Project Overview Project Objective To gather public input from residents of Levelock on environmental impacts to the Kvichak and Branch (Alagnak) Rivers and watersheds. To assess strategies and prioritize projects addressing local concerns, and empowering local management. Project Goals • Design and carry out a two-month process which documents village Howard Nelson and Ida opportunities, issues and values related to its watershed areas, focusing Apokedak review maps of on environmental impacts on these watersheds. Levelock’s watershed area. • Engage the full community in agreeing on the underlying values and priority actions for the future. Promote clear communication and decision-making among community members. • Document community discussion on watershed issues, opportunities and recommended strategies for addressing priority concerns. • Prepare a map that outlines watershed areas of significance to the community. • Compile background materials that the community can use to make decisions. • Give direction on priorities to local and regional governing organizations for new projects and programs designed to protect and promote the health of these watershed areas. • Give the community greater control over its destiny, and a stronger position working with parties from outside the community, such as government agencies and large private businesses. • Help sustain cultural traditions, subsistence, history and culture in the watershed areas. Focus Area of Study Map Prepared by Bristol Environmental & Engineering Services Corporation 4 Levelock Watershed Community Planning Project :: Final Summary Report :: Introduction Executive Summary Purpose of the Project The Kvichak River, outside of Levelock The Levelock Village Council Environmental Program initiated this Levelock Watershed Community Planning project in order to respond to community concerns over the use and health of the watershed upon which Levelock residents depend. Subsistence hunting and fi shing are vital aspects of community life and economy in Levelock. In order to protect subsistence resources for future generations, Levelock Village Council, along with residents and other partners, intends to play an active role in protecting the health of the watershed and resolving confl icts between competing uses. The purpose of this project was to gather public input from residents of Levelock on existing uses and potential threats to those uses along the Kvichak and Branch (Alagnak) Description of the Project Rivers and watersheds. This and Process During the course of this project, During the fi rst community “We want this project to bring the Levelock Village Council workshop in August, village convened two community residents identifi ed traditional together knowledge of the river workshops, facilitated by contractor and seasonal uses in specifi c areas systems, how they have been used, Agnew::Beck. Prior to the fi rst within the watershed. Residents how they are being used today.” workshop, Agnew::Beck worked also identifi ed threats to these with Bristol Environmental and uses and brainstormed potential Engineering Services Corporation solutions. Sue Flensburg, from project also identifi ed community to develop illustrative maps of the Bristol Bay Native Association, solutions to counter threats. This Kvichak and Branch (Alagnak) who provides staff assistance to the report brings together the results of rivers and tributaries. Additional Nushagak Mulchatna Watershed Levelock’s work in order to prioritize maps were created to identify areas Council, gave a presentation on that projects addressing local concerns, traditionally used by Levelock organization and its work. Residents and empower local management. residents. Agnew::Beck also also identifi ed areas for further completed background research research such as how other village into other watershed councils and corporations have enforced citations organizations, both in Alaska and against trespass and hunting on the nation. village corporation lands. The meeting ended with a well-attended community potluck. Levelock Watershed Community Planning Project :: Final Summary Report :: Executive Summary 5 Following the fi rst workshop, Agnew::Beck completed requested research and used the results from the workshop to draft a summary About 25 Levelock report and annotated map. This residents draft was then reviewed by village and guests council staff, and by the community participated at a second community workshop. in the fi rst In addition, potential partners were Community Workshop. invited to the second workshop to discuss implementation of potential strategies to protect the watershed. Summary of Community avoid certain areas for subsistence During the second community Issues, Goals & use because there are too many workshop, village residents reviewed Recommendations boats and other users. and affi rmed the conclusions in Erosion along riverbanks - due to the draft report, added comments, Issues an increase in boat traffi c, changing and prioritized outcomes. The Workshop participants identifi ed a weather patterns and other factors highest priority outcome identifi ed number of threats to the watershed. - has increasingly become an issue was to convene a meeting of Pollutants are a primary concern, of concern. Much of the riverfront project partners to plan to originating from a number of in the village of Levelock is being reinstate the Kvichak-Branch River sources including village landfi lls and washed away; the Branch (Alagnak), Patrol. Levelock youth, adults sewage lagoons; sport hunting and too, is seriously affected in some and elders participated, as well as fi shing lodge septic systems, fuelling
Recommended publications
  • Technical Paper No. 302 Subsistence Harvests
    Technical Paper No. 302 Subsistence Harvests and Uses of Wild Resources in Iliamna, Newhalen, Nondalton, Pedro Bay, and Port Alsworth, Alaska, 2004 by James A. Fall, Davin L. Holen, Brian Davis, Theodore Krieg, and David Koster December 2006 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Subsistence Symbols and Abbreviations The following symbols and abbreviations, and others approved for the Système International d'Unités (SI), are used without definition in the following reports by the Divisions of Sport Fish and of Commercial Fisheries: Fishery Manuscripts, Fishery Data Series Reports, Fishery Management Reports, and Special Publications. All others, including deviations from definitions listed below, are noted in the text at first mention, as well as in the titles or footnotes of tables, and in figure or figure captions. Weights and measures (metric) General Measures (fisheries) centimeter cm Alaska Administrative fork length FL deciliter dL Code AAC mideye-to-fork MEF gram g all commonly accepted mideye-to-tail-fork METF hectare ha abbreviations e.g., Mr., Mrs., standard length SL kilogram kg AM, PM, etc. total length TL kilometer km all commonly accepted liter L professional titles e.g., Dr., Ph.D., Mathematics, statistics meter m R.N., etc. all standard mathematical milliliter mL at @ signs, symbols and millimeter mm compass directions: abbreviations east E alternate hypothesis HA Weights and measures (English) north N base of natural logarithm e cubic feet per second ft3/s south S catch per unit effort CPUE foot ft west W coefficient of variation CV gallon gal copyright ¤ common test statistics (F, t, F2, etc.) inch in corporate suffixes: confidence interval CI mile mi Company Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Die-Off of Common Murres on the Alaska Peninsula and Unimak Island
    SHORT COMMUNICATIONS 215 SI~~PSON, S., AND J. J. GALBRAITH. 1905. An inves- WETMORE, A. 1921. A study of the body temper- tigation into the diurnal variation of the body tem- ature of birds. Smithsonian Misc. Coll. 72:1-51. perature of nocturnal and other birds, and a few mammals. J. Physiol., 38:225-238. Accepted for publication 12 July 1971. A NORTHERLY WINTERING RECORD is more than 500 mi. NW of the nearest reported OF THE ELF OWL wintering locality. The bird was mist-netted in second-growth thorn (MICRATHENE WHITNEYI) forest near a harvested corn field. It was retained alive and taken to Tucson, Arizona. It appeared to be in good CHARLES A. ELY health and fed freely on insects given it on the nights Department of Zoology of 12-13 and 13-14 January, but suddenly fell dead Fort Hays Kansas State College Hays, Kansas 67601 from its perch late on the night of 13-14 January. Upon skinning the specimen, Crossin noted a circular AND area about 10 mm in diameter on the lower stomach. RICHARD S. CROSSIN The area was a dark bluish-green in color and resem- bled dermal tissue which has received a severe bruise. Neotropical Ornithological Foundation 1719 North Huachuca The cause of the affliction was not determined, but Tucson, Arizona 85705 may possibly have resulted from the intake of some chemical poisoning during feeding. The owl might Ligon (Misc. Publ., Mus. Zool., Univ. Michigan, No. have been afflicted before its capture, which could 136, 1968) investigated the winter range of the Elf account for its wintering far north of the recorded Owl in Mexico, chiefly by playing sound recordings winter range.
    [Show full text]
  • Petition to List the Iliamna Lake Seal, a Distinct Population Segment of Eastern North Pacific Harbor Seal (Phoca Vitulina Richardii), Under the U.S
    Before the Secretary of Commerce Petition to List the Iliamna Lake Seal, a Distinct Population Segment of Eastern North Pacific Harbor Seal (Phoca vitulina richardii), under the U.S. Endangered Species Act Photo Credit: NOAA Fisheries/Dave Withrow Center for Biological Diversity 6 February 2020 i Notice of Petition Wilbur Ross, Secretary of Commerce U.S. Department of Commerce 1401 Constitution Ave. NW Washington, D.C. 20230 Email: [email protected], [email protected] Dr. Neil Jacobs, Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere U.S. Department of Commerce 1401 Constitution Ave. NW Washington, D.C. 20230 Email: [email protected] Petitioner: Kristin Carden, Oceans Program Scientist, on behalf of the Center for Biological Diversity 1212 Broadway #800 Oakland, CA 94612 Phone: 510.844.7100 x327 Email: [email protected] On November 19, 2012, the Center for Biological Diversity (Center, Petitioner) submitted to the Secretary of Commerce and the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) through the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) a petition to list the Iliamna Lake population of eastern North Pacific harbor seal (Phoca vitulina richardii) as threatened or endangered under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA). (See generally Center 2012.) On May 17, 2013, NMFS issued a positive 90- day finding “that the petition present[ed] substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the petition action may be warranted” and initiated a status review. (78 Fed. Reg. 29,098 (May 17, 2013).). On November 17, 2016, NMFS issued a determination that listing was not warranted because “the seals in Iliamna Lake do not constitute a species, subspecies, or distinct population segment (DPS) under the ESA.” (81 Fed.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Subsistence Bibliography Volume V Western & Southwestern
    REGIONAL SUBSISTENCE BIBLIOGRAPHY Volume V Western & Southwestern Alaska Number I BY David B. Andersen and Jan H. Overturf Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Subsistence Technical Paper No. 111 Juneau. Alaska 1986 CONTENTS Acknowledgements ............................................ .v Introduction ............................................... ..vi i . Abbreviations .............................................. ..Xl x Bibliographic citations .................................... ..l Keyword Index ................................................ 169 Author Index ................................................ 199 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many people have contributed time and reference material to help produce this publication. Reference collection work done in 1983 was was greatly assisted by Elizabeth Andrews, Steve Rehnke, John Wright, and Dr. Robert Wolfe who made their own collections of regional references available and offered useful suggestions regarding organiza- tion of the bibliography and additional sources. References collected in 1983 sat for over two years awaiting further work and funding, and. for a time it appeared that they would never make it into print. We have Jim Fall to thank for spearheading efforts to resurrect the project in 1986, offering suggestions for updating the collection with new material, reviewing citations and introductory text, and providing the funds for printing. Others contributing additional reference material to the updated collection include Elizaheth Andrews. Susan Georgette, Judy Morris. and Janet Schichnes. Thanks also to Dan Foster, who expertly prepared the maps appearing in the introduction. to Kathy Arndt, who painstakingly edited an early rough draft of the hihliography. and to Margie Yadlosky, who efficiently handled data entry and editing tasks on the data file. Cover artwork was the creation of Tim Sczawinski. Finally. special thanks go to Louis Brown for his programming wizardry which created the microcomputer version of the data base and the indexing routines.
    [Show full text]
  • The Newsletter of Alaska Peninsula Corporation
    SPECIAL EDITIO VOLUME 2, ISSUE The Newsletter of Alaska Peninsula Corporation Inside This Issue Chairman’s Report 2 CEO Report 3 APC Federal Report 4 Corporate President Appointed 6 Coronavirus Now Here 7 APC Shareholder Distribution 10 Shareholder Spotlight 11 APC Summer Shareholder Employment 12 Job Opportunities 12 Chairman’s Report When we first sat down to write our submissions for this edition of the newsletter, we were preparing to “These are very announce some surprise developments uncertain times for within the corporation. Information to all. Through that, include a record year of production, shareholder job opportunities, the we are confident planning for a distribution, and that our effort to developing summer projects in villages. create a sustainable, Although the mood of this good news now seems clouded by the uncertainties strong corporation of the Coronavirus pandemic, the over the last few Corporation must continue to somehow years will prevail.” forge on. It’s a difficult reality to work through, however. Many of us whose parents or grandparents survived the pandemic of 1918, vividly recall the stories of entire villages wiped from the Trefon Angasan, Chairman face of the earth in just a few short of the Board weeks-time. Many children became orphaned, stories of the territorial system separating loved ones from one another, sometimes never seeing their family or homelands ever again. For many of us, COVID-19 resurrects those images of an apocalyptic world drawn forth by a rapid acting lethal virus. History repeats itself it seems. These are very uncertain times for all. Through that, we are confident that our effort to create a sustainable, strong corporation over the last few years will prevail.
    [Show full text]
  • Petition to List Iliamna Lake Seal, a Distinct Population Segment of Pacific Harbor Seal (Phoca Vitulina Richardsi) Under the Endangered Species Act
    BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF COMMERCE PETITION TO LIST ILIAMNA LAKE SEAL, A DISTINCT POPULATION SEGMENT OF PACIFIC HARBOR SEAL (PHOCA VITULINA RICHARDSI) UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY NOVEMBER 19, 2012 Notice of Petition Rebecca M. Blank Acting Secretary of Commerce U.S. Department of Commerce 1401 Constitution Ave, NW Washington, D.C. 20230 Email: [email protected] Samuel Rauch Assistant Administrator for Fisheries 1315 East West Highway Silver Spring, MD 20910 Ph: (301) 427-8000 Email: [email protected] PETITIONER The Center for Biological Diversity PO Box 100599 Anchorage, AK 99510-0599 Ph: (907) 274-1110 Fax: (907) 258-6177 Date: November 19, 2012 Kiersten Lippmann Center for Biological Diversity Pursuant to Section 4(b) of the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 § 1533(b), Section 553(3) of the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. § 533(e), and 50 C.F.R. § 424.14(a), the Center for Biological Diversity (“Petitioner”) hereby petitions the Secretary of Commerce and the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (“NOAA”), through the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS” or “NOAA Fisheries”), to list the Iliamna Lake seal as a threatened or endangered species and to designate critical habitat to ensure its survival and recovery. The Center for Biological Diversity (“Center”) is a non-profit, public interest environmental organization dedicated to the protection of native species and their habitats through science, policy, and environmental law. The Center has approximately 40,000 members, and over 474,000 members and online activists throughout the United States and internationally. The Center and its members are concerned with the conservation of endangered species, including seal species, and the effective implementation of the ESA.
    [Show full text]
  • Bristol Bay Visitor Guide Business Directory
    BUSINESSBUSINESS DIRECTORYDIRECTORY Air Taxi & Air Tours Katmai Air Iliamna Air Taxi 4125 Aircraft Drive♦Anchorage, AK 99502 Alaska Bush Sports PO Box 109♦Iliamna, AK 99606 (907) 246-3079 ♦ 800-544-0551 PO Box 721♦King Salmon, AK 99613 (907) 571-1248♦(907) 571-1649 fax E-mail: [email protected] (907) 246-3650 Email: [email protected] Website: www.katmailand.com E-mail: [email protected] Operates daily scheduled flights from Anchor- Website: www.alaskabushsports.com age. Serves the Lake Iliamna, Lake Clark and King Flying Service Bristol Bay areas. Charter service is available PO Box 26♦Naknek, AK 99633 Aleutian Aviation statewide. (907) 246-4414 PO Box 313 ♦King Salmon, AK 99613 Serving Bristol Bay and the Alaska Peninsula. (907) 246-3030♦ (907) 246-3050 fax Charters, scenic flights, beachcombing, drop off Quality hunting, fishing, and photographic trips. Egli Air Haul, Inc caribou and moose hunts. Personally and professionally guided. PO Box 169♦King Salmon, AK 99613 (907) 246-3554♦(907) 246-3654 fax Lake and Peninsula Airways Branch River Air E-mail: [email protected] 3323 Dry Creek♦Port Alsworth, AK Website: www.heliadventuresak.com PO Box 545♦King Salmon, AK 99613 (907) 781-2228♦(866) 595-1213 Helicopter and airplane charters, flightseeing, (907) 246-3437♦(907) 246-3837 fax (907) 781-2280 fax E-mail: [email protected] adventure trips. World-class fishing, photogra- Email: [email protected] phy, filming opportunities. Bristol Bay, South- Website: www.branchriverair.com Daily flights from Anchorage to Lake Clark/ west Alaska, Katmai Park, Becharof Wildlife Floatplane service providing flight service to Lake Iliamna area.
    [Show full text]
  • REGIONAL SUBSISTENCE BIBLIOGRAPHY Volume IV Southcentral Alaska Number I
    REGIONAL SUBSISTENCE BIBLIOGRAPHY Volume IV Southcentral Alaska Number I Jan H. Overturf Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Subsistence Technical Paper No. 97 Juneau, Alaska 1984 Cover Drawing by Tim Sczawinski CONTENTS Acknowledgments .............................................. V Introduction ................................................. vii Abbreviations ................................................ xix Southcentral Regional Bibliography ........................... 1 Keyword Index ................................................ 111 Author Index ................................................. 131 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In compiling this bibliography I received help and suggestions from many sources. The help was eagerly sought after and accepted. I would like to thank the entire staff of the Alaska Department of Fish and Game Subsistence Division, Anchorage Office. Especially helpful were Dr. James A. Fall, Ron Stanek, Lee Stratton and Carolyn Reed. All of these people opened their professional research libraries for my perusal and supplied me with a nearly steady stream of papers to be read, referenced and included in the bibliography. Dr. James Fall was particularly supportive of the project. His enthusiasm and comments were greatly appreciated, and his final review of the rough draft was essential. Dr. William B. Workman of the University of Alaska, Anchorage, generously opened his research library supplying many important recent publications and hard-to- find papers. Dr. Robert Wolfe, Research Director, ADFG
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Clark National Park and Preserve, Alaska Water
    LAKE CLARK NATIONAL PARK AND PRESERVE, ALASKA WATER RESOURCES SCOPING REPORT Don P. Weeks Technical Report NPS/NRWRD/NRTR-2001/292 United States Department of the Interior • National Park Service The National Park Service Water Resources Division is responsible for providing water resources management policy and guidelines, planning, technical assistance, training, and operational support to units of the National Park System. Program areas include water rights, water resources planning, regulatory guidance and review, hydrology, water quality, watershed management, watershed studies, and aquatic ecology. Technical Reports The National Park Service disseminates the results of biological, physical, and social research through the Natural Resources Technical Report Series. Natural resources inventories and monitoring activities, scientific literature reviews, bibliographies, and proceedings of technical workshops and conferences are also disseminated through this series. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the National Park Service. Copies of this report are available from the following: National Park Service (970) 225-3500 Water Resources Division 1201 Oak Ridge Drive, Suite 250 Fort Collins, CO 80525 National Park Service (303) 969-2130 Technical Information Center Denver Service Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225-0287 ii LAKE CLARK NATIONAL PARK AND PRESERVE ALASKA WATER RESOURCES SCOPING REPORT Don P. Weeks1 Technical Report NPS/NRWRD/NRTR-2003/??? Month, 2003
    [Show full text]
  • Ecoregion-Based Conservation in the Bering Sea
    Ecoregion-Based Conservation in the Bering Sea Identifying Important Areas for Biodiversity Conservation Contents Page# PART ONE: INTRODUCTION 3 1.2 Why conduct…. 3 1.3 Description… 4 1.4 Biolog Signif… 4 1.5 Changes…. 4 1.6 Conservation opps.. 5 PART TWO: WORKSHOP REPORT 8 2.1 Methodology: Assessing Biodiversity 8 2.2 Experts Workshop 10 2.3 Selecting Conservation Priorities:The Approach 10 Subregions: Bering Strait Bering Sea Shelf Kamchatka Shelf and Coast Aleutian Islands Aleutian Basin Taxa Birds Mammals Fish Invertebrates 2.4 Threat Assessment Summary 13 2.5 Additional Issues of Concern 16 PART THREE: BEYOND MAPS, TOWARD CONSERVATION 19 3.1 Lessons from Girdwood Workshop 19 3.2 Next Steps 21 Edited by: David Banks, Margaret 3.3 The Nature Conservancy and the Bering Sea 22 Williams John Pearce, Alan Springer, 3.4 WWF and the Bering Sea 22 Randy Hagenstein, and David Olson APPENDIX A: MAPS 2-9 A1 Publication design by Eric Cline 2 Subregions of the Bering Sea A2 3 Priority Bird Areas A3 Maps and GIS Data by: Emma BIRD TABLE A4 Underwood, Jennifer D’Amico, 4 Priority Mammal Areas A5 Carrie Wolfe, and Julie Maier MAMMAL TABLE A6 5 Priority Fish Areas A7 A collaborative effort by the FISH TABLE A8 World Wildlife Fund, 6 Priority Invertebrate Areas A9 The Nature Conservancy of Alaska, INVERT TABLE A10 and Participants in the 7 Overlapping Priority Areas for all Taxa A11 Girdwood Bering Sea Experts 8 Priority Areas for Bering Sea Biodiversity A12 Workshop March 20-23, 1999 9 Existing Protected Areas of the Bering Sea A13 Cover photo of walruses by Kevin APPENDIX B: PRIORITY AREA DESCRIPTIONS B1 Schafer, provided courtesy of the photographer APPENDIX C: LITERATURE CITED IN APP.
    [Show full text]
  • Wade Cetacean Assessment and Ecology Program National Marine Mammal Laboratory Alaska Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service
    Killer whales of the Aleutian Islands Paul R. Wade Cetacean Assessment and Ecology Program National Marine Mammal Laboratory Alaska Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service With contributions from Kim Parsons, Janice Waite, John Durban, Holly Fearnbach 3 types of killer whales in the North Pacific “Residents” “Transients” “Offshores” Fish-eaters Mammal-eaters Upper-trophic fish such as sharks Variation in gray saddle patch Uniform large gray saddle patch Dorsal fin rounded at tip Dorsal fin falcate Dorsal fin triangular Often multiple nicks in fin P. Wade, NMML/AFSC/NMFS/NOAA Killer whale studies in the Aleutian Islands by NMML 2001-2010 2001-03 Systematic line transect surveys (as far west as Amchitka Pass/Delarof Islands) 2004-05 Focused surveys for transient photo-ID and biopsy for chemical studies Obtained data from a few encounters west of Amchitka Pass during a SPLASH humpback whale survey in 2004 2006 First NMML survey west of Amchitka Pass, surveyed out to Attu Island Added satellite tagging 2008-10 Added acoustic monitoring at Steller sea lion rookeries 2010 Second survey of western-half of the Aleutians P. Wade, NMML/AFSC/NMFS/NOAA P. Wade, NMML/AFSC/NMFS/NOAA >330 Encounters with killer whales 2001-2010 “Resident” type killer whales • >220 encounters • Seen more frequently that transients in the Aleutians • Average group size 19 • Nearly exclusively fish- eaters • Dark pigment intrusions into the saddle patch on some whales in the group are diagnostic to residents or offshores P. Wade, NMML/AFSC/NMFS/NOAA “Transient”-type killer whales in the North Pacific are a species that separated from other killer whales ~700,000 years ago (Morin et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Kelp-Fed Beef, Swimming Caribou, Feral Reindeer, and Their Hunters: Island Mammals in a Marine Economy
    sustainability Article Kelp-Fed Beef, Swimming Caribou, Feral Reindeer, and Their Hunters: Island Mammals in a Marine Economy Katherine Reedy Department of Anthropology, Idaho State University, 921 S. 8th Ave, Stop 8005, ID 83209-8005, USA; [email protected]; Tel.: +1-208-282-2629; Fax: +1-208-282-4944 Academic Editor: Werner T. Flueck Received: 8 December 2015; Accepted: 19 January 2016; Published: 26 January 2016 Abstract: Aleutian Islands and Alaska Peninsula residents have selectively introduced land mammals to their primarily marine based economy over the past two centuries. This paper describes these many introductions, contexts, and the longer term roles of these cattle, sheep, reindeer, and other land mammals in discrete island settings and the regional food economy based upon interviews in ten communities and comprehensive household surveys in eight of these. Caribou are indigenous and traditionally hunted in other parts of the state but are legally “invasive” in island contexts now managed by the federal government. Access to land and natural resources by Alaska Natives and rural peoples is regulated by state and federal agencies, but Aleutian residents have shaped their environment and engineered food sources to support their communities. This paper demonstrates that hardline approaches to removing invasive land mammal species will have human consequences and an integrated management policy emphasizing food security and conservation that includes reducing the density of these introduced species is most appropriate. Keywords: aleutians; introduced species; invasive species; subsistence; conservation; food security 1. Introduction In March 2010, former graduate student Crystal Callahan and I were staying in a Port Heiden, Alaska, bed and breakfast working on a subsistence project when the telephone rang.
    [Show full text]