Drillers Brave Winter Conditions to Improve Shetlands Ferry Routes
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
List of Lights Radio Aids and Fog Signals 2011
PUB. 114 LIST OF LIGHTS RADIO AIDS AND FOG SIGNALS 2011 BRITISH ISLES, ENGLISH CHANNEL AND NORTH SEA IMPORTANT THIS PUBLICATION SHOULD BE CORRECTED EACH WEEK FROM THE NOTICE TO MARINERS Prepared and published by the NATIONAL GEOSPATIAL-INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Bethesda, MD © COPYRIGHT 2011 BY THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT. NO COPYRIGHT CLAIMED UNDER TITLE 17 U.S.C. *7642014007536* NSN 7642014007536 NGA REF. NO. LLPUB114 LIST OF LIGHTS LIMITS NATIONAL GEOSPATIAL-INTELLIGENCE AGENCY PREFACE The 2011 edition of Pub. 114, List of Lights, Radio Aids and Fog Signals for the British Isles, English Channel and North Sea, cancels the previous edition of Pub. 114. This edition contains information available to the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) up to 2 April 2011, including Notice to Mariners No. 14 of 2011. A summary of corrections subsequent to the above date will be in Section II of the Notice to Mariners which announced the issuance of this publication. In the interval between new editions, corrective information affecting this publication will be published in the Notice to Mariners and must be applied in order to keep this publication current. Nothing in the manner of presentation of information in this publication or in the arrangement of material implies endorsement or acceptance by NGA in matters affecting the status and boundaries of States and Territories. RECORD OF CORRECTIONS PUBLISHED IN WEEKLY NOTICE TO MARINERS NOTICE TO MARINERS YEAR 2011 YEAR 2012 1........ 14........ 27........ 40........ 1........ 14........ 27........ 40........ 2........ 15........ 28........ 41........ 2........ 15........ 28........ 41........ 3........ 16........ 29........ 42........ 3........ 16........ 29........ 42........ 4....... -
Theses Digitisation: This Is a Digitised
https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ Theses Digitisation: https://www.gla.ac.uk/myglasgow/research/enlighten/theses/digitisation/ This is a digitised version of the original print thesis. Copyright and moral rights for this work are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This work cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Enlighten: Theses https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] VOLUME 3 ( d a t a ) ter A R t m m w m m d geq&haphy 2 1 SHETLAND BROCKS Thesis presented in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor 6f Philosophy in the Facility of Arts, University of Glasgow, 1979 ProQuest Number: 10984311 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10984311 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. -
Shetland Mainland North (Potentially Vulnerable Area 04/01)
Shetland Mainland North (Potentially Vulnerable Area 04/01) Local Plan District Local authority Main catchment Shetland Shetland Islands Council Shetland coastal Summary of flooding impacts Summary of flooding impacts flooding of Summary At risk of flooding • <10 residential properties • <10 non-residential properties • £47,000 Annual Average Damages (damages by flood source shown left) Summary of objectives to manage flooding Objectives have been set by SEPA and agreed with flood risk management authorities. These are the aims for managing local flood risk. The objectives have been grouped in three main ways: by reducing risk, avoiding increasing risk or accepting risk by maintaining current levels of management. Objectives Many organisations, such as Scottish Water and energy companies, actively maintain and manage their own assets including their risk from flooding. Where known, these actions are described here. Scottish Natural Heritage and Historic Environment Scotland work with site owners to manage flooding where appropriate at designated environmental and/or cultural heritage sites. These actions are not detailed further in the Flood Risk Management Strategies. Summary of actions to manage flooding The actions below have been selected to manage flood risk. Flood Natural flood New flood Community Property level Site protection protection management warning flood action protection plans scheme/works works groups scheme Actions Flood Natural flood Maintain flood Awareness Surface water Emergency protection management warning raising plan/study plans/response study study Maintain flood Strategic Flood Planning Self help Maintenance protection mapping and forecasting policies scheme modelling Shetland Local Plan District Section 2 20 Shetland Mainland North (Potentially Vulnerable Area 04/01) Local Plan District Local authority Main catchment Shetland Shetland Islands Council Shetland coastal Background This Potentially Vulnerable Area is There are several communities located in the north of Mainland including Voe, Mossbank, Brae and Shetland (shown below). -
Water Safety Policy in Scotland —A Guide
Water Safety Policy in Scotland —A Guide 2 Introduction Scotland is surrounded by coastal water – the North Sea, the Irish Sea and the Atlantic Ocean. In addition, there are also numerous bodies of inland water including rivers, burns and about 25,000 lochs. Being safe around water should therefore be a key priority. However, the management of water safety is a major concern for Scotland. Recent research has found a mixed picture of water safety in Scotland with little uniformity or consistency across the country.1 In response to this research, it was suggested that a framework for a water safety policy be made available to local authorities. The Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (RoSPA) has therefore created this document to assist in the management of water safety. In order to support this document, RoSPA consulted with a number of UK local authorities and organisations to discuss policy and water safety management. Each council was asked questions around their own area’s priorities, objectives and policies. Any policy specific to water safety was then examined and analysed in order to help create a framework based on current practice. It is anticipated that this framework can be localised to each local authority in Scotland which will help provide a strategic and consistent national approach which takes account of geographical areas and issues. Water Safety Policy in Scotland— A Guide 3 Section A: The Problem Table 1: Overall Fatalities 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 Data from National Water Safety Forum, WAID database, July 14 In recent years the number of drownings in Scotland has remained generally constant. -
Report Page 1
Fernlea, The Wishart Anderson (Support Service) Support Service Fernlea The Wishart Anderson Centre Marrister Whalsay ZE2 9AE Inspected by: Allan Barker (Care Commission Officer) Type of inspection: Announced Inspection completed on: 13 October 2005 1/9 Service Number Service name CS2005097965 Fernlea, The Wishart Anderson (Support Service) Service address Fernlea The Wishart Anderson Centre Marrister Whalsay ZE2 9AE dummy Provider Number Provider Name SP2003002063 Shetland Islands Council dummy Inspected By Inspection Type Allan Barker Announced Care Commission Officer dummy Inspection Completed Period since last inspection 13 October 2005 11 Months dummy Local Office Address Room 205 / 222 Charlotte House Commercial Road Lerwick Shetland ZE1 0HF dummy 2/9 Introduction Fernlea, The Wishart Anderson Care Centre, was a purpose built residential centre with an adjoining day care facility. The service, situated in Marrister on Whalsay, overlooked the picturesque Linga Sound. The service was registered to provide a support service to a maximum of eight adults on a daily basis. The service presently operated two days a week. The support service had a separate service entrance and own staffing compliment. The accommodation consisted of various rooms including, bathroom facilities, a lounge and activity area, kitchen /dining room and two offices. The areas were decorated with photographs and artwork and was of a homely-like appearance. The care service, previously operated by Shetland Welfare Trust had recently been transferred over to Shetland Islands Council, social care department. Basis of Report This report was based on consideration of the service's compliance with the regulations associated with the Regulation of Care (Scotland) Act 2001, as well as taking account any requirements, recommendations, or areas of development identified from the inspection of 23 November 2004. -
02 March 2021 WCC Minutes
WHALSAY COMMUNITY COUNCIL Draft Minute of the Whalsay Community Council (CC) meeting. Held on Tuesday 2nd March 2021 at 7pm via WebEx. This minute is a draft until approved at the next meeting. PRESENT: CCllr Jackie Leslie (JL) – Chair CCllr Pete Gaines (PG) CCllr John Dally (JD) – Vice Chair CCllr Margaret Hughson (MH) CCllr William Polson (WP) Duncan Anderson – North Isles Councillor (DA) CCllr Anne Huntley (AH) APOLOGIES RECEIVED: Michael Duncan – External Funding Officer Roselyn Fraser – Community Involvement & & Community Council Liaison Officer (MD) Development Officer (RF) Ryan Thomson – North Isles Councillor (RT) MINUTE TAKER: Rhea Kay – Clerk WELCOME: JL welcomed all to meeting. APOLOGIES: Apologies noted. RF to possibly join meeting later. DA informed CC AP had another meeting. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: JL asked JD to declare his interest as SCBF Director/Vice Chair and also Vice Chair of WCC. JD said he could but did not feel it necessary as SCBF provided no financial benefit to him personally. JL believed this constitutes as a conflict of interest. There were differing opinions which resulted in the Chair having to agree to disagree with JD for the meeting to proceed. APPROVAL OF PREVIOUS MINUTES: JL asked if all are happy with previous minute. AH requested an amendment on discussion regarding the Wild Garden path - to note that a proper pedestrian path around the exterior of the garden and by the road is made, not through the garden. CC supported change. MH approved minutes, PG seconded. FINANCE REPORT: CC happy with latest monthly finance report received. MATTERS ARISING: SYMBISTER HARBOUR - CRANE, OLD DOCK, DREDGING, REPLACING OF MARINA PONTOONS, NETTY PIER Latest updates shared lights at Outer Pier were to be fixed and CC later noted they had been. -
Marine Safety Policy Issue4ver0
Shetland Islands Council Marine Safety Policy (2019) Page intentionally left blank Issue 4.0 Marine Safety Policy Version 0 Shetland Islands Council October 2019 Shetland Islands Council Marine Safety Policy The ‘Shetland Islands Council Marine Safety Policy’ provides the assurance that Shetland Islands Council (SIC) as the Harbour Authority consistently and appropriately address the requirements laid out in the Department for Transport (DfT) ‘Port Marine Safety Code’. The Marine aspects of this Policy have been prepared using the latest version of the Port Marine Safety Code (the Code) published in November 2016, and the Guide to Good Practice (the Guide), published in February 2018. The Marine Safety Policy describes how the Harbour Authority’s overarching responsibilities in respect of the Port Marine Safety Code are designed and implemented across all SIC ports and Harbours. This Policy document is delivered at Port and Harbour level through the ‘Shetland Islands Council Marine Safety Management System’, which provides the foundation for ensuring individual SIC Ports and Harbours embody Quality Management and address the requirements of the Code. The ‘Shetland Islands Council Marine Safety Management System’ is supplemented with local Marine Safety Management Systems (MSMS) for Sullom Voe, Scalloway Harbour and SIC small Ports and Harbours. These separate MSMS documents incorporate port specific operational manuals and plans. Signature of Approval and Authority: The following signatories agree and approve the Shetland Islands Council Marine Safety Policy: Approved by Deputy Harbour Master: Office copy has original signatures ..... Date: ....................... (as Quality Manager) Approved by Harbour Master: Office copy has original signatures ..... Date: ....................... Approved by Director Infrastructure Services: Office copy has original signatures .... -
Whalsay Transport Link STAG Report Zettrans May 2008
Whalsay Transport Link STAG Report ZetTrans May 2008 Prepared by: ................................................ Approved by: ................................................. Joanne Casey Paul Finch Principal Consultant Associate Director Whalsay Rev No Comments Date 1 Draft for Client Review 02/05/08 2 Final following client comment 15/05/08 225 Bath Street, Glasgow, G2 4GZ Telephone: 0141 222 6400 Fax: 0141 222 6499 Website: http://www.fabermaunsell.com Job No 55280TABT/ WS601 Reference 11 May 2008 This document has been prepared by Faber Maunsell Limited (“Faber Maunsell”) for the sole use of our client (the “Client”) and in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between Faber Maunsell and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by Faber Maunsell, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of Faber Maunsell. f:\projects\55280tabt zetrans regional transport strategy development\ws 601 whalsay stag2\11\back up of final report\whalsay stag 2 final 080515.doc Faber Maunsell Whalsay Transport Link Executive Summary Introduction ZetTrans commissioned Faber Maunsell to undertake a detailed examination of options with regard to the transport link between Whalsay and the Shetland Mainland 1. The analysis follows Scottish Transport Appraisal Guidance (STAG 2). This note summarises the STAG process undertaken in order to reach a preferred option to be considered for funding. The ‘Do Nothing’ option is considered to be unacceptable. Currently the route suffers capacity constraints at peak times which is reported to be hampering the commuter base of the island. -
Foster2018 Redacted.Pdf
This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Norse shielings in Scotland: An interdisciplinary study of setr/sætr and ærgi-names Ryan Foster Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Edinburgh 2018 Abstract This is a study of the Old Norse (hereafter abbreviated to ON) setr/sætr and ærgi place-names in areas of Scandinavian settlement in Scotland. The elements setr/sætr and ærgi all have a general meaning of a place for summer grazing in the hills, referred to in Scotland as a shieling. However, the related terms setr and sætr, are employed as shielings names in Norway and are indistinguishable from each other in Britain. It is only in areas of Scandinavian settlement in Britain and the Faroes that ærgi is found to signify a shieling site. -
Aton Review 2010:Layout 1.Qxd
The United Kingdom andIreland The UnitedKingdom Authorities General Lighthouse Review 2010 -2015 Review Aids toNavigation Aids to Navigation 2010 - 2015 COST EFFECTIVEREVIEW TRAFFIC ~ RISK ~ INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS 1. Index Section 1 - Index 2 Section 2 - Introduction 4 Section 3 – Review Process 6 3.1 Start and Finish of Review Process 6 3.2 Conduct of the Review 6 3.3 Peer Review 6 3.4 User Consultation 6 3.5 Transfers to LLAs and period of transfer 6 3.6 The Principles applied in determining the Navigational Requirement 7 3.7 Methodology 7 3.8 Forms 8 Section 4 – Background to Review & Factors relevant to the Review 9 4A Navigational Issues 9 4A.1 Modern Navigation 9 4A.2 E-Loran 9 4A.3 e-Navigation 10 4A.4 Transition phase to e-Navigation 11 4B Marine Traffic and Density 11 4B.1 Aquaculture 11 4B.2 Fishing 11 4B.3 Marine Leisure 11 4B.4 Offshore Renewable Energy Sites (OREs) 12 4B.5 Routing Measures and Traffic Separation Schemes (TSS) 12 4C Technology Issues 13 4C.1 Automatic Identification System (AIS) 13 4C.2 Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs) 14 4D Future Issues 15 4D.1 2025 & Beyond 15 4D.2 Power Required for Daytime Lights and Restricted Visibility. 15 Section 5 – Contacts 17 Section 6 - References and Acknowledgements 18 Section 7 - Glossary of Terms 19 Section 8 – List of Review Areas 20 ‘s 2 Marine Aids to Navigation Strategy - 2025 & beyond Aids to Navigation 2010 - 2015 REVIEW Section 9 – Inter-GLA Diagrams covering Review Areas 21 a. Navigation Review Area with GLA Contiguous Zones 21 b. -
Whalsay Community Council
Whalsay Community Council Minute of Meeting of the Council on Tuesday 3rd September, 2019 Whalsay School – Meeting Room Present: Apologies Received CCllr Jackie Leslie (JL) Michael Duncan – C.C. Liaison Officer CCllr William Polson (WP) CCllr Pete Gaines CCllr John Dally (JD) CCllr Margaret Hughson (MH) Minute Taker CCllr Anne Huntley (AH) Elinor Simpson (ES) Attending: SIC Cllr Duncan Simpson Roselyn Fraser Police – Angela Manson The meeting started at: 7.00 pm Agenda Item Narrative Welcome Chair JL opened the meeting and welcomed all attendees. Apologies were noted. Declaration of CCllr AH declared interest in request for safety mirror. Interest Minutes of the Meeting held 04.06.19 were approved by CCllr MH and Approval of Previous Minutes seconded by Cllr WP. Matters Arising Road/Pedestrian Safety concerns Further discussions took place re the possibility of a cycle path from Huxter to the school if funding could be secured through the Active Travel Project. Concerns continue to be raised also around Heatherlea Junction/Sandwick Junction. There has been no further communication from Robina Barton. An email from Bo Hickey, Information Officer, Sustrans was received 3rd June asking for more information from WCC about our priorities for routes. Clerk has emailed requesting what level of information is required. No reply so far. School Bus Transport Reply has been received from S.I.C. to effect that as yet they do not have numbers of pupils who would be needing transport next session but would let us know what is planned once they have that information. Clerk to email. Policing Concerns Police in attendance at meeting. -
Report on Rare Birds in Great Britain in 2009 Nigel Hudson and the Rarities Committee
Report on rare birds in Great Britain in 2009 Nigel Hudson and the Rarities Committee his is the 52nd annual report of the the Royal Mail. Their progress in this format British Birds Rarities Committee. After stuttered and faltered as each member tried Tthe milestone of our 50th anniversary to resolve the situation and reach a conclu- in 2009, it feels somewhat like a return to sion. Throughout this period new informa- business as usual. However, we continue to tion was arriving from Europe, where birds endeavour to improve our operations and bearing a significant resemblance to some of procedures and this year brought a signifi- the British claims were visiting, and some- cant advance in the means by which we share times lingering in, Sandwich Tern S. sandvi- files electronically. That may not sound censis colonies. This proved valuable in some earth-shattering but it has helped voting respects, with evidence that some of these members to process records more quickly, to birds were considered to be Elegant Terns everyone’s benefit. While efficiency is always (and news that Elegant Tern genes had been an important goal, we are conscious that it identified in material obtained from one of should not be at the expense of quality. Our the individuals, although that particular bird ability to process decisions more quickly and was considered to be a hybrid on morpholog- then report them automatically via the Work ical characters). Eventually, one of our in Progress files on the BBRC website members took it upon himself to bring a (www.bbrc.org.uk) may lead to decisions fresh approach to the assessment and pre- reaching the public domain without the sented an impressive case, advocating that the benefit of a final consensus check for the series of records from Devon in 2002 should Committee, or without the opportunity to in fact be considered as separate individuals.